The title of this post is lifted from a comment by mendo, who wins COTW for it.
Regression towards the latrine (a pun on the genetic hatefact “regression towards the mean”) is a succinct, clarifying statement on the reigning ethos of our time, which is the Harrison Bergeronian ideology that demands the destruction and deconstruction of all hierarchies, aesthetic and transcendent, so that the degenerate freak mafia may feel the equal of their betters.
Oliver Elkington writes,
Everything is beautiful according to these freaks, cancer, facial disfigurements, vomit, camel droppings. To be honest it is virtually impossible to reason with them, the best one can do is try to stop them having unlimited airtime.
mendo adds,
The idea behind that is that once everything is “beautiful” then nothing will be.
The Antiwhite and Antibeauty Left, if given unchecked power, inevitably ends in one place: the latrine. For it’s only in the cesspit of the latrine that the Left can finally claim victory and realization of their vision for humanity: Nothing to admire nor aspire to, all envies pacified, all ambitions mollified, all behaviors sanctified, all filth normalized.
The Equalist Ideology is, in sum, the doctrine of the garbage dump.
Everything is beautiful to these freaks EXCEPT normal heterosexual white people having white children.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Watching fakenews this morning, its hard to believe how biased they are with endless ‘white racists’ ‘white neo nazis’ etc, but when black lives matter its ‘they bring up legitimate grievances’ – this of course only makes more people swing right.
LikeLiked by 4 people
There are only two ways all of this can play out successfully for whites (that is, in a r*ce-sustain*ble way)
– widespread rise in white r*cial consci*usness (i.e. recognition that whites have group interests). By “widespread” I mean just 10% of adult white m*les (such men will bring the w*men with them). That is probably just about the tipping point.
– the end of the F*deral government and the dollar power. Because it is the power of the f*deral govt, its laws and its enforcers that pr*vent whites from simply exercising our right to fre*dom of ass*ciation (d*scrimination or “r*cial self-l*ve” as we might call it)
Without F*deral government action, whites could form their own c*mmunities. The various st*tes would c*mpete in order to attract and encourage whites.
What is the chance of getting 10% of whites to re*ognize the need for r*cial s*lidarity over a relatively short period of time? The Jews seem to think it is a pretty good chance, the way they are spinning things like Ch*rlestown. So don’t get down. Things are probably looking up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The State’s monopoly on violence needs to be broken.
LikeLike
I had a mildly similar thought to yours, VD, though not as detailed and well-thought out.
Essentially this will either awaken those who at some point were questioning the status of the current situation, or it won’t.
And you are correct, that 10% is feasible.
LikeLike
+100
LikeLike
Sorry to be O/T, but I’ve been thinking about making lemon out of lemonades here, and that second-degree murd3r case of the Charlottesville Dodge driver is gonna be an OUTSTANDING opening for a skilled Alt-Right law team to subpoena EVERYTHING out of George Soros Inc, and prove a massive criminal conspiracy to subvert the constitution via subterfuge & mayhem & violence.
If I were George Soros Inc, I would be very, very scared right now.
As deep as George Soros’s pockets are, and as many appeals as he will likely throw at the defense team, this case may NEVER go to trial.
I can easily see it going to the Supreme Court multiple times, as Soros does everything in his power to remain in (((the shadows))) and avoid the Light of day.
LikeLiked by 5 people
How could soros get involved?
LikeLike
He pays the piper. He calls the tune.
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
The (((courts))) will ensure that never happens.
LikeLike
While I agree that it would be great to expose the perfidy of Soros and his cabal, the prospect of this occurring in a criminal trial is highly unlikely. In order to subpoena third-party records, the connection between the victim and Soros would have to be material and relevant to the charged crime. Compare, say, the vic’s psych records to show a propensity for violence supporting s self-defense claim. The burden of proof is huge and the likelihood that the court will grant a motion to quash the subpoena is equally high.
Probably a better tactic to throw the perpetrator under the bus as an outlier and distance the alt right movement from an isolated event. Sacrifice the pinky finger to save the arm and fight another day.
LikeLike
The lawyer argues that there was an interstate criminal conspiracy to create a mob which attacked his client, and put his client in fear for his life, and that for the jury to understand the full power of the financial & time & labor resources which were invested to create the mob, the court must issue subpoenas which will shine the light of day on this conspiracy and help the jury to understand the awesome power of the malevolent forces which were assembled to put his client in fear for his life.
And then move to have the trial venue changed from Virginia state court to the 4th District federal court so that proper interstate subpoenas can be issued.
LikeLike
Hill Reporter Taylor Lorenz:”police officers at station: guy wasn’t malicious,was scared” http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3576895/posts
LikeLike
There it is – the police say he wasn’t acting maliciously – he was terrified.
Cut and dried.
The Defense team subpoenas EVERYTHING from Soros Inc and reconstructs the interstate paper trail which allows them to describe to the jury the creation of the horrifying mob that put the defendant in fear for his life.
Cut and dried.
LikeLike
“There it is – the police say he wasn’t acting maliciously – he was terrified.
“Cut and dried.”
Speculation out of total ignorance (willful ignorance tbh; I don’t want to foul my mood by scudding through MSM) but was there anything (((special))) about the driver after all?
That said, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to figure it WAS an accident.
Meanwhile, is msnbc running with the chopper shot down by SAMs or is that one blowing over too?
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
[…] Regression Towards The Latrine […]
LikeLike
Vonnegut’s fictional character Harrison Bergeronian — the smartest, strongest, most athletic person on Earth — is black.
Fiction is dangerous because its enjoyment relies on willful suspension of disbelief; i.e., White men must abandon their reason, logic, and empiricism. Vonnegut was on to something but decided to carry water for the (((GloboHomoPoz))) of his time.
LikeLike
Source on him being black?
LikeLike
I read Harrison Bergeronian and don’t remember thinking of him as black. Maybe he was….
LikeLike
The name is Harrison Bergeron. I haven’t seen any references to him being conceived as black, nor depictions of him being so: “He flung away his rubber-ball nose, revealed a man that would have awed Thor, the god of thunder.”
LikeLike
“Vonnegut’s fictional character Harrison Bergeronian — the smartest, strongest, most athletic person on Earth — is black.”
Are you projecting? Are you black? There was nothing in the story that said anything about him being black. Plus, Vonnegut published this in 1961. This was before the Civil Rights Act, when blacks were required to be equal to da White man. In fact, most people didn’t think of blacks much at all, except as an unpleasant reality.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Explain yourself, hard9bf… or just STFU BEFORE you post nonsense, not merely AFTER.
LikeLike
I must be thinking of something else. Withdraw assertion the protagonist is black.
LikeLike
Good on ya, hard9bf… we all make mistakes.
Take note, you other alleged alt-R allies… when you’re wrong, admit it and maintain credibility.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Greg “cyberia is an altR echo chamber! the real news is on actual TEEVEE!!” says:
“Take note, you other alleged alt-R allies… when you’re wrong, admit it and maintain credibility.”
right.
LikeLike
LikeLike
dweebstreep projecting his own incontinence yet again, go figger.
First, he pisses his pants every time I post.
Then, his verbal diarrhea starts.
And if he ever stood before me in meat world, rather than the safety of his keyboard, he’s REALLY shit himself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And for the record, I’m getting tired of you gots nuthin’ dweebs twisting prior statements in your lame ass attempts to neener-neener.
My earlier post “actual TV” was in reference not to “real news”, but to the point that when one speaks of starting up a network to compete with the current (((MSM))), another echo chamber merely in Cyberia doesn’t cut it.
John Q. Public still seems “actual TV” in his home, at the airports, in hotel lobbies, and every damn place else. That sort of 24/7 propaganda, with various degrees of subjective news, fake news, and whatever news, is what one is competing against for the hearts and minds of the vast multitudes yet to be red-pilled…
… whether we like it or not.
Trump didn’t win because the alt-R had such clever memes over the interwebs… he won because the average Joe and Jane, who couldn’t tell Pepe from Kermit, liked his style (as viewed on ACTUAL TV screens) and were rightfully put off by the Cunt’s antiWhite and antimale bitchery.
We continue to lose when we should be winning at a faster and greater pace because we can’t respect the truth unless, like the foes we decry, it scratches the itches of our own biases.
LikeLike
Greg “truth above all else or we LOSE!” “I’m punishing you losers with a self-imposed hiatus!” Eliot says:
“My earlier post [blah blah blah…me me me…self-justify self-justify self-justify…blah blah blah…me me me] doesn’t cut it.”
LikeLike
Another broke wind from the dweebstreep asshole, go figger.
Trump defends himself from all the snarky cunts and he’s The Man… but when dweebstreep gets his haid handed to him and called out on his lies, the other guy is merely “self-justifying”, go figger.
Can’t have it BOTH ways, chump. This is why YOU lose.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
Greg, you’re the king of “neener-neener”. Streetsweeper is Captain Oblivious-tier opp but there is no one here more disingenuous than you, bud.
LikeLike
What you call neener-neenering on the part of Greg is merely Greg doing what he can to maintain the integrity of Le Chateau.
And in many ways, it is the same as the old guard reproving the younger guard as was many a generation ago. And sadly that’s been lost vis a vis this South Park generation, to borrow a phrase.
LikeLike
I’m not opposed to oldfags trying to keep order. I do that myself. But anyone observing this without the need to spin everything – mendo – will have noticed that Greg is the embodiment of “who blamed it, flamed it”.
LikeLike
ML, like the other halfwits ’round chere who come to snark, you need to check your self-written dictionary.
Let me put you wise.
Neener-neenering is merely attempted mockery, often inane and dull-witted barbs that don’t hit the mark because they don’t ring true, and invariably don’t stick to their intended target.
Witness the recent Neecy attempt to disparage the alt-R because two police died in a helicopter crash and some 32 SJW cooze who shouldn’t have been out protesting to begin with was unlucky enough to be in the path of some panicked miscreant.
Or witness the interminable attempts of dweebstreep. Case closed.
Now, answering back said inanities with some barbs that DO hit the mark with clever homage and such, or being a much-needed Dutch uncle to some of the South Park generation who hasn’t learned yet what manhood entails, that’s NOT neener-neenering… that’s called paying back in coin of the realm, or delivering a much-needed and well-merited smackdown.
IN the future, if you’re going to attempt to play third man in, have the decency to bring some fight into the ring…
You fairy.
LikeLike
Perfect case in point. Really – thank you.
LikeLike
You’re making my point for me, just with the inane expression “oldfags”. A lamer attempt at neener-neenering has seldom been seen at the chateau, which is REALLY saying something.
WTF is it with your vapid generation that you have to work your homoerotic projections into every attempted insult, let alone think such things are clever?
You, with no woman… no children… no property… no dick.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
oldfag effortpost tl;dr kek
LikeLike
And apparently you missed both my mention of using homage and the homage itself… which is so well-known and well-worn at the chateau, it’s become wry shtick.
Then again, that sort of humor always did fly above the haids of those for whom any mention of “fags” is considered the epitome of retort.
LikeLike
Heh, heh… a paragraph is tl;dr for the attention span of the South Park snarker, go figger.
Fail more, dweeb. You and the other streeper make an apt pair of bookends.
LikeLike
Tfw /polspeak taken seriously
Wamp wump
LikeLike
Someone’s going to have to translate that for me…
… I don’t speak imbecile.
LikeLike
“who blamed it, flamed it”.
Is that like “who smelt it dealt it?”
LikeLike
Greg “I don’t speak imbecile!” Eliot can’t remember we he parked his walker.
newsflash, Greg: you’re not funny or edgy. you have good old school values that are useful, but your self-importance clouds your message….and you keep digging yourself deeper… and deeper.
it’s beyond tiresome. it’s actually embarrassing.
LikeLike
Sounds a lot like the try-hard poz method of insult in which, if one is disgusted by queers and says as much, it’s because one fears them and.or that one is secretly queer oneself.
LikeLike
Yea. Every group has that disingenuous actor accusing everybody else of doing exactly what they’re doing. It’s one of the deepest abysses of human psychology, imo, usually seen in women.
LikeLike
Try harder, dweebstreep… just because I don’t take the guff of you assholes, and I hurts yo’ feelz, your attempts to neener-neener me about age fall flat.
We meet in meat world, all I hear from you types is “Sir”.
And you coming to the chateau under sock-puppy monickers in the continuous failing attempts to hound my heels is what’s embarrassing.
Wake up to yourself, boy.
LikeLike
“is that like he who smelt it dealt it”?
an homage to Greg “a man admits when he’s wrong!” Eliot:
He who denied it, supplied it.
He who deduced it, produced it.
He who attributed it, distributed it.
He who detected it, projected it.
He who perceived it, conceived it.
He who expressed it, compressed it.
He who related it, deflated it.
He who protested it, foam-crested it.
He who derided it, provided it.
He who maligned it, designed it.
He who smelled it, expelled it.
He who opined it, refined it.
He who rued it, brewed it.
He who revealed it, peeled it.
He who quipped it, ripped it.
He who knew it, blew it.
He who reported it, exported it.
He who decoyed it, deployed it.
He who averred it, disinterred it.
He who eschewed it, spewed it.
He who mocked it, knocked it.
He who tells of it, smells of it it.
He who spoke it, broke it.
He who disclaimed it, enflamed it.
He who exposed it, composed it.
He who noted it, floated it.
He who relayed it, sprayed it.
He who damned it, grand-slammed it.
He who said it, shed it.
He who relayed it, made it.
He who thought it, wrought it.
He who unearthed it, birthed it.
He who sensed it, dispensed it.
He who sensed it, commenced it.
He who spoke it, broke it.
He who disputed it, tooted it.
He who squeaked it, cheeked it.
He who berated it, created it.
He who sensed it, dispensed it.
He who spurned it, burned it.
He who noted it, floated it.
He who declared it, aired it.
He who blurted it, squirted it.
He who speaks it, reeks it.
He who spurned it, burned it.
He who committed it, emitted it.
He who shunned it, tail-gunned it.
He who rebuked it, nuked it.
He who hyped it, piped it.
He who blamed it, flamed it.
LikeLike
This latest attempt at Alinsky shithouse psychology shaming is yet another tell that your generation’s playbook has become so hackneyed and devoid of creativity that even alleged alt-R allies can’t escape its hold.
More’s the pity. These are our allies, are they?
Yet another page in the ever-growing tome This Is Why We Lose.
LikeLike
Yea. We’re losing because of reactions to your conceited personality on a blog.
LikeLike
Living rent-free in dweebstreep’s haid hasn’t provided the economy one would have hoped, go figger.
LikeLike
Yea. We’re losing because of reactions to your conceited personality on a blog.
Didn’t I already slap you for using your own dictionary?
The fact that you, like our SJW foes and (((others))), don’t pay attention to the actual meaning of words is part and parcel of why we lose.
Any conceit evinced in these subthreads can be laid squarely at the doorstep of you and your ilk, who fancy they can just butt in with snark and not be held accountable, let alone get far more than they give.
LikeLike
Greg’s never made a grandiose claim along the lines of “X will happen in Y days/weeks.”
He’s always been dubious of such claims, so I’m not sure how that follows with the “he who denied, supplied it.”
He never supplied anything.
You damn (((JIDF))) trolls are offering up a big nothing burger and accusing him of doing something he’s never done.
LikeLike
Greg “I’m taking a self-imposed hiatus because this comments section doesn’t deserve ME!” Eliot says:
“Didn’t I already slap you for using your own dictionary?
…
[blah]
[blah]
[blah x infinity]
…
let alone get far more than they give.”
LikeLike
THANK you… for awhile there I was wondering what planet I had landed upon.
And there’s dweebstreep again, projecting his own disingenuous blather about his feelz, rather than the truth of the matter…
… which, for the record, was due to the barrage of that sauceyqueer becoming even more insupportable than usual on some of the previous threads.
Once that thankfully subsided, alas, here dweeby and his latest clown MuhLabia have to butt in yet again in comment between myself and another poster.
LikeLike
I wager this isn’t the first time Greg has been told that he’s a disingenuous sort. He’s too practiced at rationalizing it all as the other guy’s problem.
Oh well. Everyone other than Greg is an “IDF troll”. You got us.
LikeLike
As I’ve mentioned innumerable times, big tell about the inanity of the South Park generation is that their attempted neener-neeners make no sense, hence the barbs don’t stick.
It’s good to have an occasional voice of reason, and a bro to cover one’s six, here at the chateau.
Tip o’ the ten gallon to you, mendo.
LikeLike
I’ve never been accused of being disingenuous… as a matter of fact, the word itself only caught on ’round chere after I myself used it.
You clowns have a tendency of paying me that kind of compliment. Strapunzel used to try to throw back the words and phrases I used all the time.
As far as being the attempted target of South Park snarkery, you’re absolutely right, this isn’t the first time.
You’re in the company of other dweebs, shills, and sock puppies, keep you warm.
Never from the acknowledged true alt-R men and rational allies of the chateaul.
Translated: he soundly counters all the flaccid barbs tossed his way, and we hate hit when his hit the mark.
Work on that dictionary, kid.
LikeLike
“I’ve never been accused of being disingenuous…”
good grief. emotional incontinence indeed. you make sorcerygod look like Hemingway.
LikeLike
Fail more, dweeby… you’ve been trying to make a meal out of that phrase for awhile now, and like all your other projections, it backfires on the shooter far more than the intended target.
Very telling that you never came to snark the insipid and innumerable inanities of saucyqueer, but never miss a beat following my footsteps.
Why is that, boy? Father figures bother you THAT much? Daddy never took you to a ball game? What?
LikeLike
“I’ve never been accused of being disingenuous… as a matter of fact, the word itself only caught on ’round chere after I myself used it.”
Perfect example. Not only is he not being disingenuous, he literally gave us the word.
LikeLike
Streetsweeper
LikeLike
ML
LikeLike
Captain Obvious:
LikeLike
When all is said and done, Cap’n Obvious gets the best last (thousand) word(s). kekekekekekekek
LikeLike
Vonnegut said nothin’ about that in the story…
LikeLike
“Fiction is dangerous because its enjoyment relies on willful suspension of disbelief”
WTF does that even mean? I think dangerous is when people are viewing reality with a willful suspension of disbelief, not fiction. Like when a 300 pounder sees some mold growing in one of her fat folds and tells herself she’s beautiful anyway.
Fiction? Who doesn’t know it’s fiction when they read it? Top shelf fiction is by the greatest minds for high IQ people. Yeah, it’s been appropriated by the left for quite awhile now but that will pass. A culture that can’t produce or appreciate fiction is dangerous. HIgh end fiction isn’t dangerous. It’s about the best thing in life outside of 25 and under T & A, imho.
LikeLike
[I think dangerous is when people are viewing reality with a willful suspension of disbelief, not fiction]
[HIgh end fiction isn’t dangerous. It’s about the best thing in life outside of 25 and under T & A, imho.]
Second those motions, melmoth!
I think a lot of BOTTOM shelf fiction and popular culture (AKA “poz”) has certainly been appropriated by the left.
However, I’m not certain that what we might call the genuinely top shelf of fiction has entirely been, which may be either too idiosyncratic or SUI GENERIS to really be appropriated by politicos of any stripe in the passing parade, too far above most heads buzzing with all the affairs of the day.
But what would you, Melmoth, (or any Chateau reader, for that matter) consider for placement in the top shelf of fiction in our time and for our posterity, Anno Domini 2017?
LikeLike
Anyone describing anything short of guns, groids and hungry bears as “dangerous” is a sanctimonious posturer and should be ignored immediately.
LikeLike
Chairman Angela Moon-Glampers
Hillary Rodham-Moon-Glampers. her turn!
Janet Reno (shudder), obviously.
LikeLike
Between “egalite OU LA MORT”
And “deserve to get it good and hard”
is there any doubt where this is headed?
(not to mention “he will put those wicked tenants to a baaaaad ending”, and “trust me you WILL pay back to the lastest shekel”)
LikeLike
It must be difficult being raised from birth being told that you are part of a (((chosen people))) of the almighty God, and yet look at beautiful, strong, intelligent, productive, successful White goyim and know that our mere existence proves the lie of their upbringing and religious cult teachings. That, in fact, sums up the Skypes in a nutshell, for that is the reason they want to destroy us. Our existence makes their supremacy impossible. They are only fit to be supreme over a dumbed-down, brown/black miscegenetic race of men – and that is their goal. Making ugly seem beautiful, weak seem strong, the perverted seem sane, evil seem pure, profane seem sacrosanct, dumb seem intelligent, and cultures seem equal, are all a part of this long-term plan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point and right on the nose of one of the many, many, many problems of Middle Eastern cults.
‘G0d created Man in His image.’
Really ?
That g0d must be one f_cked-up pile of sh1t.
(((They))) are his chosen people.
Srsly ?
Not only is that g0d one f_cked up pile of sh1t, he also has extremely bad taste.
LikeLike
wolfkin,
((They)) have a deal with God.
But,
We have one too
And God will hold us to ours, lame whining to the contrary nothwistanding
LikeLike
God will not be mocked, and stripes for the backs of fools, wolfenschlub…
… and you wonder why even your own mother hated you, go figger.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
That’s why when (((they))) obtain “power” (through whatever means), they take our “best” women. You can’t blame them for that I suppose, clearly (((their))) god must have had some disgusting spouse judging by the quality of the average jewess.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I sense that ramzpaul is jealous of Andrew Anglin.
LikeLike
Ramzpaul can’t decide whether he has a pair or not,
LikeLike
Come to think of it, apart from a few photos of them together, I have no idea if they’re really together. She could be delusional. Haha.
LikeLike
True story: I’ve been internet friends with his Romanian girlfriend for years.
She is about 75% insane. I mock you guys for seeing Jews behind everything, but she ACTUALLY thinks so. If her internet goes down or she loses in a video game, it was Jews, and she’ll rant about it for as long as you listen.
Cute though. Great tits too.
LikeLike
Pic?
LikeLike
And his little Farcebook too…
LikeLike
once everything is “beautiful” then nothing will be.
Personally, I couldn’t care less what fat-blobs call themselves, they won’t EVER be in my bed, so what do I care? They can think they are beautiful – more power to them, doesn’t change reality…
LikeLike
you don’t care now
but wait until you decide to settle down with someone because you want a future with her or have kids
then your girl stops making an effort to look attractive or be pleasant for you because she’s told by every friend and family member, tv, movies, advertising, and every article she reads that she doesn’t have to do jack shiz to make you happy. she can’t be bitchy naggy, dress like a slob and make no effort to be feminine or attractive for you but you still have to stay with her and be faithful until you die anyway
LikeLiked by 1 person
*can be bitchy naggy…
LikeLike
women used to know that your loyalty came with certain expectations. they had to earn it. now they think they deserve loyalty even when they don’t
LikeLike
yea disappear for a night expect you to not do anything
why I tell em I got a wife from beginning
LikeLike
and have balls to say what I need from beginning
like needing variety
or tell her when i’m being monogamous until she fucks up
recently though I did say i’d be monogamous but did stray to see what it felt like yea I can see why people do the behind the back shit and get the rush it was anti-climactic though and after felt like shit and had to tell girl truth
so she has choices
she told me I had 2 free coupons more
before that she said she didn’t mind me getting dick sucked and I changed it
now she said today whatever makes me happy makes her happy
so yea if she need other dudes or chicks then just has to say it so I can make same types of choices
LikeLike
that’s not acceptable man. probably not even because you did anything wrong though. a lot of girls are just like that now
they have been raised to think everything they do is okay and you have to forgive it, stay loyal, and treat them like a princess.
easy to just walk when you have no investment in them. gets harder to deal with after you’ve put some time into them or kids are involved though.
suppose only way to make it work if you feel like you need to try sticking it out with them is to let them know you can’t be expected to do your part (staying faithful, treating them well, etc) until they start living up to their end of the bargain (dressing and behaving in ways that please you, treating you well, making sex a priority and focusing what you need, etc)
if they won’t put their focus on doing those things, they don’t deserve your loyalty and good treatment and you have to make it known that you feel that way. and that you’ll go outside of relationship to find someone who does.
don’t think there is any other way. sucks that is has to be that way though.
LikeLike
told her I wouldn’t today had chick over cleaning and maintained so feel pretty good right now
LikeLiked by 1 person
that’s good man. chicks can sure be a pain in the ass sometimes
LikeLike
yea I rarely find chicks I want to be with
the chicks I click with I seem to click with for life
LikeLiked by 1 person
i know what you mean.
most guys on here say they are all the same and there’s always another one around the corner. good way to think so you don’t get too depressed when things don’t work out with someone.
but i’ve only had a couple i’ve really clicked with too. most girls are okay and good enough for a relationship but there really have only been a couple who i really clicked with. if people are honest i think most of them would say the same.
why do you think captain obvious is always saying how if we find a good girl who we have natural chemistry with, we should lock em down and keep them? it’s because it’s more rare than people want to admit.
LikeLike
You’re right midnighttoker. We aren’t all individuals making our own choices, despite what the (((Mises Society))) wants us to believe.
Society defines what is acceptable behavior and what they will forbid and enforce and we can lock our windows and doors if we line but the (((media))) enters our homes through the airwaves and then enters your bitch’s tiny, herd-following brain. So then all of that outside shit becomes our shit too.
There really isn’t any such thing as poolside when you are surrounded with nigs and fatties.
LikeLiked by 1 person
prob is like u were saying can’t really lock em down in us
can just be with em it looks like
i’m trying to be captain save a ho though lol
so prob are ones maybe can but then like u said the culture don’t help
and they have the power
LikeLike
“why do you think captain obvious is always saying how if we find a good girl who we have natural chemistry with, we should lock em down and keep them?”
LikeLike
Gunslinger version
LikeLiked by 1 person
If she can’t ACTUALLY make you happy, she can’t actually make you stay either – not really; and all of that poz is irrelevant once you put things in perspective for yourself.
LikeLike
the pregnant pic should be the marching flag
all other symbols nothing
LikeLike
the gunslinger version of course rofl
LikeLike
“why do you think captain obvious is always saying how if we find a good girl who we have natural chemistry with, we should lock em down and keep them?”
Because he’s a loser with none of his own, obviously. Like all moral busybodies.
LikeLike
i agree with you Democritus
a girl can’t make a man stay if she’s not doing what she should to keep him. and she doesn’t deserve his loyalty at that point.
problem is, most men aren’t walking on girls like that. they are staying with them out of obligation, fear of backlash from friends and family, because they feel guilty, are worried about kids, etc.
they are conditioned to stay no matter how shitty a girlfriend or w1fe she is but she can walk at the drop of a hat with no judgment.
the only way this changes is if men start showing women they have to step it up or they will lose good men.
LikeLike
@ML
no one cares what you have to say. get the hell out of here.
LikeLike
Woh there son, I’m not sorceryfag, I have feelings!
LikeLike
RE: The “White Woman Problem” – Ms. Heyer lived alone with her Chihuahua, Violet, who was named after her favorite color. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/13/us/heather-heyer-charlottesville-victim.html
LikeLike
LikeLike