Jayman writes in a comment to this post,
Hajnal line. It’s all about late vs early marriage. Northwestern Europeans married late (average age for women 23) for centuries. Eastern and Southern Europeans married much earlier (often in early teens for Russians, for example). This is a pattern that continues to this day, albeit at later ages across the board (the rank order remains fairly unchanged).
Right, and the Hajnal Line is now colloquially associated with differences in a bunch of other inter-european characteristics, such as clannishness, familism, nationalism, passivity, and fondness for watching from the corner stool. (Paradoxically, fertility rate is unusually low in Outer Hajnalia.) Anyhow, I wonder when the trend of Inner Hajnalia late marriages will bang up against the biological reality of the Wall. That is, given a choice, men aren’t really happy about marrying women with only a few years left of supple fuckability in them. Preference for younger virginal women is universal among men. And there are many biological reasons men prefer virgins over road worn sluts who’ve spent the better part of their salad decade warming up for their ludicrously ostentatious wedding day.
At some point the raw Darwinian calculus will re-emerge and there will be a pendulum swing back toward younger marriages with hotter, tighter babes who have oodles of residual reproductive value left.
[…] Inner And Outer Hajnalia […]
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 4 people
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is the beauty that is the cornerstone of the natural order, those who fight one fight the other as well
They bound to lose, beauty will always reassess itself,after the time of darkness it will only shine brighter as sun does after a storm
LikeLiked by 2 people
C, not to sound like a prude, but are you reasonably confident that all of those models were >= 18 y.o. at the time they posed for those shots?
LikeLike
Legal beagle here weighing in. They don’t have to be 18 when they’re not displaying clam strips.
One would argue that they needn’t be of such an age to mårry, as well.
LikeLike
JJ, we’re lucky that the GE is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave [although equally unlucky that Queeff Sessions is at Justice], but if thecunt had won last year, and if any of those chicks flashing the n!pples were <= 17 y.o. at the time of the pics, then the feds would have shut down Le Chateau last night, and all of us would have had SWAT teams storming our houses before dawn and frog-marching us off in handcuffs.
The Deep State loves it some Ch!ld Pr0n – you either get a guaranteed conviction & removal from polite society, or else you get a marionetted stooge who dutifully licks your boots for the remainder of his career.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point, CO. Only sh!tlibs get away with calling pørn “art”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
CO not sure what do you mean “posed for those shots”
These are paintings
Few painters if any would take as a compliment if they paintings were mistaken for photos but I am not sure about Serge Marshennikov
It is obviously his intention to render nudes as “realistic” as possible
and therefore it is likely that the paintings were based on models
I do not know what the law says in this instance but these reproductions are all over the net
LikeLiked by 1 person
If thecunt had of won I believe we would have seen a push to lower the age of consent – for same sex “relationships”. Would fit the swamp beautifully.
LikeLike
Gotta confess: I’m not super keen on having tons of children.
But make the mom a supple 19-year-old with a spring in her step, and I’m suddenly a real family man.
LikeLike
FORMULA FOR SCORING 19 YOs: Fast. Work on Game. Fast. Lift. Fast. Perfect the Inner Frame. Fast.
EmbraceBecome ZFG. Fast. Twinkle in the eye. Fast. Open on all of them, even if the opening is nothing more than, “Hello!”. Fast. Jerkboy. Fast. BUNZ -> OVENZZZEZES.LikeLiked by 3 people
probably the fundamental difference between dating older and younger right there. the young ones inspire you to invest big in her. “buy! buy! buy!”
the older ones make you want to put your time and energy elsewhere. “sell! sell! sell!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps the E.U. will fall and the Holy Roman Empire will be restored. I imagine a place like the Czech Republic being a place that goes from 90% atheism to 90% religious. Sure, there are analysis showing Eastern Europe and other places we hold dear ‘worsening”, but there are signs and signals in ways big and small that make it appear something good is about to happen.
LikeLike
I wonder if the Hajnal Line could use a tweak. Allowing it to touch the Mediterranean doesn’t seem right, if my spidey senses are correctly tuned.
LikeLike
Italians use alcohol. They are on our side of the line. The principle dividing characteristic of the Hajnal line is the use of hashish versus vodka as an intoxicant. It really only applies to the horse cultures of the Steppes in far eastern Europe and the forest cultures of the same regions in their north. In short, are you Turcoman or Slavonic? Check out Mongolian women BTW. Surprisingly pretty.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Huh. Twice today you’ve taught me something useful, Danger. Nice.
LikeLike
There’s a 3-way intoxicant divide in Europe between beer, wine and spirits.
http://cdn3.chartsbin.com/chartimages/l_1017_9fded3865dbb950a6e1fc60e0034ebe8
It roughly follows Europe’s other 3-way ethnic and cultural divides:
Physiognomy: Nordic, Mediterranean, Alpine
Language: Germanic, Latin, Slavic
Religion: Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox
The Hajnal Line divides Europe into a core and a fringe, but in reality there are 3 great racial and psychological zones:
North: Woke
South: Woke/Based mix
East: Based
LikeLike
I think Jay man is off on his first mar**age age by about 7 years for most of Europe too. Early mortality and about 75% child mortality made early family formation a necessity. There was real biological incentive to start early and keep up production to have a retirement- i.e. your surviving children.
LikeLike
Oh god again this bullshit.
1) How do you explain Finland (high nuptiality)?
2)How do you explain Italy north of Napoli and Spain north of Valencia-Badajoz line?
3)Where does Ireland (high nuptiality west of “hajnal line”) fit in this all?
4)How is Czech republic fit all this “theory”?And btw Poland the line splits Poland in two, while it was always a unofirm culture
5)”clannishness, familism, nationalism, passivity, and fondness for watching from the corner stool”. Lol.Your understanding of Europe is pretty “american”. It is to say you dont know what you are talking about. Eastern Europe is as heterogenic as anywhere else. The cultural (and economic) difference between Estonia and Romania are as huge as between Sweden and Spain.
But most importantly- clanliness and nationalism in pre-1940 Britain was equal to what you observe in Easter Europe now. In fact, the clanliness of Brits has never been gone- just look at Commons and which schools they all come from and how far back their relationships go (recently sacked D Green is T May’s friend from uni, Cameron and B Johnson are from the same social club at Oxford, J Hunt knows all of them pretty much from childhood and so and son).The concept of “old boys” club is pretty much British.
6) What is Eastern Europe by the way? Is Croatia eastern or southern Europe? Bulgaria? Estonia has the same “culture” as Serbia?
LikeLike
LikeLike
https://www.google.com/amp/s/hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/big-summary-post-on-the-hajnal-line/amp/
LikeLike
In other words, “how to really limit the pool of women to ensure life-long celibacy.”
LikeLike
The Hajnal line is a deceptive way to divide Europe.
A better classification is:
1. Insulated lands – for most of their history, didn’t have to deal with hyper-ethnocentric MENA invaders or infiltrators. Minimal Muslim raids, small or non-existent Jewish population. Britain, Scandinavia. Wealthy, powerful, but with minimal mental defense against clever MENA malice (Culture of Critique etc.)
2. Conquered lands – overrun and broken by Jews and Muslims duringthe Middle Ages. Balkans, Sicily, southern Spain.
3. Border lands – Navarre, Provence, Hungary, Poland. Repeatedly assaulted by MENA invaders and infiltrators, but never fully conquered. These White people are neither naive on the one hand, nor broken spirited on the other.
The EU is an institution based on the Insulated bribing the Conquered to join them in embracing the Culture of Critique – but the Borderlanders are resisting.
LikeLike
Setting a good example for White Americans
LikeLike
White Racial Survival 101:
If you say that you are willing to die for her, you are answering the wrong question.
The correct question is: Are you prepared to kill for her?
LikeLike
The question shouldn’t be: What are you willing to do for her?
The Question should be: What does she do for you?
LikeLiked by 1 person
BINGO
LikeLike
‘The Question should be: What does she do for you?’
The answer: Provide White heirs.
LikeLike