Because niceguys excuse women’s shitholistic behavior.
There will always be an urge in people (not just couples therapists and marriage counselors, although they are more prone to experiencing the urge) to relieve women of and burden men with responsibility and accountability. This is a consequence of the Fundamental Premise, which states that eggs, being pricey, add value to the vessel which houses them, and therefore that vessel commands deference and apologia from all social and institutional forces.
The feminist complaint of an oppressive patriarchy that puts women under the jackboot of men is literally the opposite of reality, but we should not be surprised by feminist delusion because it’s also in the nature of women to ignore their advantages and to focus on those perceived injustices that insufficiently coddle them to a torrential splooge.
On female unaccountability, @TrevorGoodchild notes the connection to Game and the modren dating market,
Women are also more attracted to men who hold them to account, and are actively repelled by betas that give them a free pass (they’ll still take the freebie, though)….
This may be one of the clearest definitions of Game and sexual market dynamics I’ve read outside of my own very stable genius scribblings. What kind of men hold women to account? Jerkboys. What kind of men absolve women of personal responsibility? Niceguys. Women love the former, and hold the latter in contempt.
Women don’t want a toady, regardless of any claims to the contrary. Women want a challenge. A man who will call them out on their shit. And jerkboys are the men who will give them that thrill.
CH: “to relieve women of [and burden men with] responsibility and accountability”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love that clip, thanks Cap
LikeLike
Opened Chr!stmas Day, TWO DECADES AGO. Wow. Time flies.
LikeLike
[…] The Main Reason Women Despise Niceguys […]
LikeLike
Yesterday, a woman of about 50 – nurse, separated mother of 2 adult kids, relatively normal for this degenerate era – told me yesterday that it is fairly common for guys her son’s age to hit on women like her in bars, quite agressively. Said it recently happened to her.
Is this even a thing? Has the 20/80 thing got to where 5% of the young guys are fucking 95% of the fuckable young women, so that the other 15% who are even trying are hitting on almost-grandma?
[CH: word from the wench trenches confirms: the thirst is epic and the de facto polygyny among sexually active young women is widespread.]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Easy target, path of least resistance. Sometimes when I was younger, just wanted to get laid. Or this lady is utterly full of shit and pulling tour chain. Divorcees will lie about anything, and they’re crazy.
LikeLike
Sounds like she’s full of it.
LikeLike
I was at a pool party hosted by a friends 40 something parents when I was 18. Late in the evening, a drunken 40ish divorcee was following me around in the pool, showing me her saggy funbags and groping at my junk. I was NOT interested in tge least.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In my teenage years, any babe north of 40 (or even 30 with a few rare exceptions) was about as sexy, alluring, and attractive as my grandmother. The thought of even seeing them in the buff, much less taking things further, was downright scary. Today, alas, a 40 year-old is easily young enough to be my daughter. Oh, well… (For you youngsters, one of the few benefits of aging is you can hear someone refer to an “attractive” 50 year-old without actually bursting out laughing.)
LikeLike
What Clydesdale said. Things have changed. Back in the day, a 40-odd female approaching a 20 year old would be politely declined, trying to keep the shock/horror off your face (and you’d then crack up telling your mates later).
I do remember one woman in a laboratory job, where you worked sat on tall lab stools. She would come over to ask a question about work and stand with one leg either side of yours, just resting her mound on your thigh while looking you in the eye. She did it with all the young guys.
LikeLike
“nurse’ … heh.
Yeah, it could happen,.. but only if she’s flaunting her goods (i.e., she’s a wh0re) and they’re still able to raise a b0ner. Or, the young guys are just really drunk.
LikeLike
45 year old white women often have a body that’s still better than most 25 year old latinas shaped like burritos.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s hilarious but very true.
LikeLike
Low hanging fruit.
Back in my 20s, I banged a few middle aged women. Looking back I can see how beta it was, and it probably even retarded my progress in self development and stepping up to becoming a complete man. Can be hard to resist tho if you have a decent looking woman wanting sex, and with her own job, car, house, and is willing to pay for shitt to give you in order to keep you around.
LikeLike
The most suitable response by a man being hit on by a post-wall woman.
“Come back and see me when you are twenty years younger.”
LikeLiked by 3 people
Very nice comeback, mustard.
LikeLike
Dude, when chicks tell you long ass stories like that, the subtext is she wants to be the girl in the story and she wants you to be the guy in the story. That’s about their level of creativity. So obviously simple it’s surprisingly hard to believe, but when her eyes are twinkling try following through with her Scheherazade act like a harem keeper would and she’s yours for the ravaging.
LikeLike
The other night a girl told me that I had a mentality from the 1930s. She meant it to be deriding but I took it as a compliment. Paradoxically I also have the reputation of being a “bad boy”.
Being a Jerkboy more and more means standing up for yourself and for decency. With the current culture, pushing for traditional, natural, values makes you counter-culture. I guess being the outsider that doesn’t back down is all that it takes.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Being a Jerkboy more and more means standing up for yourself and for decency. With the current culture, pushing for traditional, natural, values makes you counter-culture.”
Yeah, I was amazed when an attractive girl I know found it a turn-on when I told her I was a Catholic who couldn’t get involved with any woman who had ever been married before, which was one major reason I kept having to dump women.
LikeLike
Did you also tell her that, because you’re Catholic, you don’t have sex before marriage?
LikeLike
It should have been implied… but I do have a story waiting for her in that regard if that comes up.
LikeLike
Women (rightly) know by instinct that a man who is too sheep hearted to stand up to a woman will be too weak to stand up to a saber tooth tiger, a business dealing or a crop failure. Not only that, his sons will be wimps too, thus eliminating a primary reproduction vector.
LikeLike
I was leaving Costco once and saw this lady leaving her cart by the side of her car, and not taking it to the cart-rack which was just a few parking spaces away. She was a complete stranger, but I looked her in the eye and said this wasn’t freaking Sam’s Club (This Costco is located in a high income very nice part of town). She immediately apologized and went back & grabbed the cart and put it away. I was laughing inside because she was totally compliant and I was just being a dick.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Because she knew she was doing something douchey.
LikeLike
Nope.
Pure instinct, when the little darlings hear “the voice”.
LikeLike
Keep up the good shitlord work. Men were made to direct women.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She was acting like a child when she thought that she could get away with it.
Most women never grow out of this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Example #3456239 of why women must, nay want, to be led by a man. Even if it’s a stranger and something as innocuous as an (deliberately) errant shopping cart.
She’ll be thinking about it for days, getting hot and flustered at the thought.
LikeLike
I read the Aziz Ansari episode, and lol. That’s what happens when dorks try to have sex with each other, awkwardness. Or if she was a white woman, that’s what you get by going out with a bindi.
Anyways, guys should definitely work on understanding how women communicate, which is not like a guy. They give you hints, verbal and physical, and you have to be paying attention to get it, otherwise you will miss it. It becomes easier as you get more experience, but some men are forever clueless, and this Aziz guy is one of them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The extra schadenfreude is the dude wrote a book on dating and relationships. If you’ve ever hear the guy speak (in his standup) about his dating life, it’s obvious he’s clueless.
Lefties destroying awkward feminists makes me laugh
LikeLike
Now that’s funny! An Indian guy writing a dating book. Was it only half a page?
LikeLike
Yeah.
The first third was about spiking her drink; the second third was about raping her and the final third was about throwing acid in her face when she rejects later advances.
LikeLike
That’s hilarious. No wonder the shitlibs are falling over themselves to defend this bindi. Fvck them all. I hope that @metoo keeps on going, and gets even worse. The more all these hypocrites are burned by their own bs, the better.
LikeLike
That story on babe.net (which is an appalling bog of crap even by the standards of Jezebel, The Frisky yadda) never states the race/ethnicity of the writer. Need pix.
LikeLike
“Women want a challenge. A man who will call them out on their shit. And jerkboys are the men who will give them that thrill.”
There’s more to it than that. When betas are first exposed to game, their reaction is “Women can’t possibly be that animalistic!” But, a woman really wants to be dominated. That’s why you have pimps. That’s why women will be “sleeping bags” to some biker. That’s why they will make pen pals out of incarcerated murderers. If you have never seen Mystic River, you will see the animal nature of females. The wife of the Sean Penn character, who killed Tim Robbins because he thought Robbins had killed his daughter, comforts Penn because he realizes he killed the wrong person. I’ll just print this from Movie Chat to give you the synopsis:
“So she tells him that she and their daughters view him as a king – a king who has the strength and willpower to do anything to protect them even if it is a hard thing to do like killing a man. And even though in this case it turned out to be the wrong man, it was the right decision at the time and he has to live knowing that he did it out of love for his dead daughter Katie. She also says that other people are weak compared to them – i.e., other people could never be as emotionally strong as they are – and could never make those tough decisions, so the fact that he did means “he could rule this town” if he wanted to. This doesn’t mean he is going to become a local crime boss. It is her way of saying he is the strongest man in a town of weak people and he has to move forward knowing that. After this, in the next scene, we see Jimmy come downstairs to watch the parade and he is completely different – confident, etc. Basically he has come to terms with killing Dave and will move forward and it was her speech that did that. We get a glimpse of what Jimmy is going to be like in the future.”
“Another key part of her speech is when she talks about how Celeste mistakenly told Jimmy that her husband Dave killed Katie. In the speech Annabeth says “What kind of wife does that?” – i.e., what a weak woman Celeste must be to turn on her husband even when he might have done something wrong. This is driven home when she sees Celeste wandering the sidewalk looking for her dead husband – the man she abandoned – and how it destroyed her life, while Annabeth is perfectly happy because she has accepted her husband for who he is. When they lock eyes, you can see the disdain Annabeth has for Celeste who she views as a weak woman.”
While it was only a movie, it highlights the reality of a woman’s need to be protected and secure in her world. Even if it was wrong, her own emotional well-being is always more important than right and wrong.
LikeLiked by 3 people
See Synge’s Playboy of the Western World.
Red pill from 100 years ago.
LikeLike
we are currently in the era of female evil, whereas a hundred years ago it easy male evil that shaped the world (acts of mass brutality in wars, etc). The kill-count women have racked up since this era bega, first with the introduction of automated home appliances, progressing through birth control pills to tinder , is comparable to both world wars. Of course all abortions are forced, insofar as their emotions (read controlfreakism) compel them to murder the life inside them #bittersweet #LittleAngelInHevvin. So it’s really men who are responsible , after all, every single development in ‘reproductive care’ and technology was perfected by supplicating men. It’s said that hell is disproportionately populated by women, so perhaps they’re held to higher standards of accountability by non-earthly rule maintainers.
LikeLike
a hundred years ago it *was
LikeLike
Tim Robbins and Sean Penn……
LikeLike
Nice face Tim!
Say, what was that movie about, again?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tim Robbins finally came along to take the heat off Ned Beatty, amirite?
LikeLike
It’s funny you should mention Mystic River, because as much as I hated that movie, the scene where Sean Penn’s wife sticks up for him like that always affected me… a true “wow… just wow” moment, especially in this current malaise culture where women are cutting down men at every opportunity.
That said, Bill Murray should have won Best Actor that year, but I digress.
LikeLike
We also want a lover, not a child. There is nothing more repulsive than a man who looks to you as the decision maker.
LikeLike
… Meanwhile, we’re sure to complain about being left out of the decision making process – because equality.
LikeLike
You mean, awarely or not, that women are children by default — and maybe it repulses them to be treated as anything more mature.
LikeLike
… after bitching and moaning for fifty-odd years about how men make all the decisions.
LikeLike
Haven’t you seen the children of weak parents crave rules and leadership despite shitting on their parents? This is no different.
LikeLike
The problem is that men ever took that bitching and moaning seriously.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on parallelplace.
LikeLike
Women give life. Men take life. The rest is commentary.
LikeLike
Thanks for stopping by the comments section – remember to pick up your prize on the way out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Without a man´s “gift”, only thing women give is a monthly smelly red stain on the furniture.
Who´s the life giver now?
LikeLiked by 5 people
Eh, women don’t so much “give” life as process it . Women don’t even have agency in choosing to get pregnant or caring for their kid – that’s why fertility ques are important for men seeking quality partners – a woman’s predisposition to being submissive, nurturing etc are all based on inherent factors.
They ready dont have much of an active role. They’re like mid teens in terms of self awareness and independence. Mostly fit into whatever their surroundings make them to the ability of their inherent predispositions.
That is why men protect women and dominate civilization as patriarchs. Women are eternally stuck at that stage teens go through where they want to think they’re smart/independent because they think they understand a concept, but don’t actually have the ability to do it or understand it on any sort of a deep level.
To the best of my knowledge every female mammal gives birth and takes care of its young. It’s not an accomplishment. It’s instinctual, automatic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Civilization”, eh? How long has that been around? How long would the Social Pozness Zombies last if not protected by your precious “civilization”?
And don’t give me this shit about women having no agency. Sure there are plenty of zombies with holes running around — and that’s what Game is about exploiting. Women, on the other hand, recognize civilization is a womb war and are choosing to pump out as many high quality babies as their bodies can withstand despite the risks to life and limb: Risks you’ll never take with your own body to stand athwart the civilization and its fall, by walking up to an AIDS vector who is going through girls like a hot knife through butter in the nightclub scene, challenging him to go to the island with you and, if he refuses, killing him.
LikeLike
women give life, men build life ( and civilizations) men protect life.
LikeLike
LikeLike
“Give” life? So when you have the heart attack surely looming in your near future, we should just have a random woman squat on your face and “give” you life?
Women are the ambulatory test tubes in which a quite complicated experiment in organic chemistry can occur (if you want to sizzle things down to basics and leave out the “commentary”).
LikeLike
If Bowery had any balls he’d challenge a race-mixing nigger to single deadly combat. But he doesn’t, so he won’t.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bowery is looking for a champion.
It’s a sad commentary, that we don’t have one.
LikeLike
He’s an old man, Captain, and it’s not for him to put down those “vectors”.
He has told us what to do. And instead of stepping to the task, commenters mock him for being old.
Classy!
LikeLiked by 1 person
he didn’t show
LikeLike
Funny you should mention that, Captianchaos. I’ve been training with a military survival expert for precisely the purpose of going down fighting in such a challenge before I’m so old I have no more to offer my people than my death. Now, what is your real name, Capatainchaos? My real name is James Bowery. Where do you live? I live at 4065 Airport Road, Shenandoah, IA. Drop on by anytime and we’ll head on a hunting trip.
LikeLike
By the way, if “Captainchaos”, whoever he is, cows from this, you all know what to do.
LikeLike
Just so ya’ll know I’m being fair to the coward hiding behind the pseudonym “Captainchaos”, I’ve published the rules for Natural Duel years ago and he read them years ago so he knows what he’s getting into. They’re the artificial selection pressure that created whites and are listed under “Natural Ecclesia” at:
http://fairchurch.org/TheFairChurch.html
The most pertinent point:
Any sovereign may challenge another sovereign to formal combat for any reason. The following are the conditions for such formal combat:
All combat shall be one sovereign individual against one sovereign Individual.
A challenger shall give formal public notice three days prior to combat and a formal public declaration of reasons therefore.
There shall be up to a one year interval from the time one is challenged to formal combat before one may again be engaged as the challenged. This interval may be shorted by the challenged issuing a formal public declaration of its termination. The challenged may not shield others from the end of combat through the end of this interval.
Subject to the following provisions, the conditions of formal combat shall be established by a majority vote of all sovereigns of the community who assemble after three days public notice. The intent shall be to give challenger and challenged the equal opportunity they would have In Nature — if no human society existed. Terrain of the combat ground shall be varied and extensive enough to permit strategy and to give the physically weak the chance that Nature gives them. Combatants shall have equal weapons and clothing. Weapons shall be a sword or knife with a blade not to exceed 25 cm (approximately 10 inches) plus a 15 meter (approximately 50 feet) length of strong cordage. All previous agreements between challenger and challenged are automatically suspended during the period of formal combat. There shall be no rules within the combat ground. Challenged and challenger shall enter combat ground from opposite sides. No one but challenger and challenged shall be within the combat ground. No one shall attempt to aid, hinder or observe what happens. It Is intended that only one shall return alive from formal combat. When two return alive one shall forever be shielded by the other. The relationship must be announced jointly by them before they are permitted to leave the combat ground. Two are not permitted to return alive if one has been permanently disabled or disfigured by his opponent.
No sovereign who has an unanswered challenge pending may leave the community, refuse combat, or relinquish one’s sovereignty.
Guilt for breaking any point of this agreement shall be determined according to Item 3 above. The invariable penalty for anyone found guilty of breaking any point of this agreement shall be death within twenty-four hours.
LikeLike
In accord with “a formal public declaration of reasons therefore”:
The coward going under the pseudonym “Captainchaos” has a history of mocking the ancestral culture that created him, as a white, and one of the only people who is committed to restoring that regime of artificial selection (aka “eugenics”) so as to reverse the dysgenic effects of civilization and wake up even more of the zombies with holes running around, restoring them to womanhood, than Game. He’s an enemy of the white race.
LikeLike
Poor Bowery. He ran out of his medication again. Now he’s having another episode.
Please, have pity on a clearly deranged and desperate old man. Send what money you can to the address that Bowery has provided. Even nickels and dimes stuffed into an envelope will help. This way Bowery will always be able to afford his Seroquel. Lulz
LikeLike
You all know what to do:
https://steemit.com/immigration/@jabowery/erik-the-younger-background-for-a-screenplay
LikeLike
Though I don’t know her personally, there’s a marriage/sex counselor in my wife’s broader social circle. Out of curiosity, I looked her up to see what her philosophical approach to relationships might be. To say they’d be diametrically opposed to the teachings of CH would be an understatement. On her Instagram are such gems as “If you want the goddess, worship her” and “The nicer you treat her outside the bedroom, the naughtier it will get inside the bedroom.” To think some poor guy is actually paying this “professional” for this type of relationship advice is tragic. Why would a counselor peddle this philosophy when they have to know deep down it’s total rubbish? Really activates my almonds.
https://www.instagram.com/ashleygrinonneaudenton/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Kickbacks from divorce lawyers
LikeLiked by 1 person
wow never thought of that holy shit that is probably true
LikeLike
Hahahaha
Occam’s Razor
LikeLike
Being nice to a woman – occasionally – is part of the whole thing
but you the man choses when you’re nice to her, if she gets all she wants when she wants then you are her beta circus dog…and she will leave you for a more alpha man.
CH has explained ( better than I can ) that rewarding women in an unpredictable occasional way is the best thing.
If memory serves CH was saying reward one out of four times , leave her guessing why you did not do it the other times, she will try harder to please you.
[CH: the golden rule is: intermittent reward, consistent punishment, occasional mercy.]
LikeLiked by 2 people
Women get off on contrast. Being a jerk all the time desensitizes her to it. Which is why an occasional caress while being generally firm is great or why you go from full contact missionary(elbows on bed) to fucking her doggy with just your dick touching her. Or why you kiss her neck/whisper something sweet after pushing her mouth down your dick or whatever. Mind fucking girls like this not only makes them love it, it’s also quite amusing when you think of it after you did it.
LikeLike
Do you remember when on national news they showed some soyboy ducking a foul ball and it hitting his girlfriend? And how much he was belittled by man and woman alike for not shielding her or trying to catch the ball?
Girls shit test to find out whether their prospective mate will take a dive or stand up straight when the shit hits the fan.
LikeLike
most women aren’t worthy of protection, I’d also duck
LikeLike
Obviously this is yet another gem of truth. This site has been going hard, dropping truth for over a decade.
The most infuriating, and bitter question of all to me, is that given that all of this wisdom that CH, Roosh, and others have uncovered, is rooted in antiquity, how the hell was it revolutionary knowledge in 2008?
Why were we not told? Sure, I get the Frankfurt School’s predation on our ancestors’ civilization, and that official channels were not going to relay this information, but on a man to man level, why was this not shared? I’ve been introducing tiny pieces of red pills to all my children over the years; yet 99% of fathers, grandfathers, and great grandfathers just didn’t bother? I get not knowing, but again, this was all common knowledge at one point.
The men of the past who dropped the ball are just as guilty as the denialist cucks of today, and just as guilty as the (((culture))) that spawned this mess.
Sorry I’m sure this has been asked and answered a million times. Sometimes a lamentation is all you can muster.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it all started when dads didn’t beat the shit out of woman for locking them out of their own houses
LikeLike
downhill from there
LikeLike
just like me doing nothing to these stupid ho;s for taking my loot
gonna go downhill
LikeLike
WL, that’s a huge topic of conversation.
Guessing from my knowledge of my Dad’s generation, I suspect that they just weren’t keeping tabs on Pop Culture and they never realized how horribly things had degenerated.
In fact, my guess is that they would have felt it the height of effeminacy to have kept abreast of Pop Culture.
LikeLike
Wynnloyd,
I think a big part of it is in the olden days men could get away with a lot more blue pill thinking and still have a decent life. 50 years ago a 20 year old beta could show some interest in a HB6-7 in her late teens/early 20s, write her love notes, take her on dates etc, and inspite of the off-putting betatude she would m arry him for fear of being percieved as damaged goods when she hit the wrinkly old spinster age of 23. He would get a couple years of weekly wifely-duty fucks to produce the children that their families and society expected of them. The sex would dry up after they had 2 kids or so but he would think this was normal. He wouldn’t get divorced and could work and save money and have a decent life. If he has a son he would proceed to teach him the same blue pill bullshit about “the one” or whatever because it worked reasonably well for him (he did after all bang a decent looking young woman at least a couple times) and the cycle could repeat itself.
But with the rise of feminism and the new social and family norms all that shit is out the window. The beta today gets nothing. Or worse for lack of options he wifes up a ridden-hard-and-put-away-wet 35 year old with kids who is 10 years older than him and bangs him a dozen times at the most then divorces his ass on the same day he loses his job to some indian guy on an HB1 visa.
LikeLiked by 1 person
All about control. Better you have it than her.
LikeLike
“Well, I can change that in a hurry.”
LikeLike
Reagan tripling the national debt and legalizing millions of illegals. The woman = American people
LikeLike
The main reason women despise… my eyes scanned the “N” and “s,” and I just assumed
LikeLike
Got a story illustrating the OP.
A girl was trying to steal a hanky from my back pocket on the dance floor and I noticed and grabbed her wrist. In front of two nice guys, I played a game where I touched her on the back of the hip. The boys complained to the bouncers about me. A year later, after us talking for maybe 5 mins., she plays a sneaky grabass on me. My flirty game made impact that lasted a year and the nice guys were invisible to the broad.
LikeLike
Let me clarify. The night of the attempted hanky purloin, I played my flirty game on the girl and I chatted with her for 5 mins. A year later, with no contact…I had no idea she was in the bar…she played a sneaky grabass on me.
LikeLike
“This is a consequence of the Fundamental Premise, which states that eggs, being pricey, add value to the vessel which houses them, and therefore that vessel commands deference and apologia from all social and institutional forces.”
Please leave this spergy drivel out. None of the Entitled Princess ™ Syndrome afflicting young snatch is in any way derived from the fact that she bears eggs. There were far fewer EP’s in 1950 than today.
[CH: the fundamental premise applies to all eras. the differences in female entitlement between eras can be accounted for by egalitarian pressure to squelch its most noxious manifestations. but don’t think for a second that social forces didn’t favor women in the 1950s or 1850s or even farther back than that. modern working woman feminism isn’t the only avenue through which a culture expresses deference toward women.]
LikeLike
As ol’ Ferris Bueller said (and why Obama’s foreign policy sucked):
LikeLiked by 1 person
CH, yeah, the Inuits expressed their deference towards women by killing 40% of female children. Similarly other tribes where male work was needed to keep the tribe alive and women children were a burden on the tribe.
[CH: female children aren’t reproductively viable. you’d be hard pressed to find a society in any time that treated the lives of their fertile young women as disposably as they treated the lives of the typical man.]
LikeLike
Further bear in mind that half of all first time births resulted in the death of the mother, so the adult ratio was around 4 men per woman.
[CH: not relevant to my point]
LikeLike
“Further bear in mind that half of all first time births resulted in the death of the mother, so the adult ratio was around 4 men per woman.
[CH: not relevant to my point]”
It’s also completely wrong. *Half* of all first-time births? Not even half all *babies* were stillborn in ancient times.
LikeLike
Maybe you missed the point that, even with the number of women (& eggs) cut in half after the first childbirth, the societies were still killing/not supporting juvenile females. But not killing males. Because male labor was more valuable than eggs.
Seriously, the “eggs are soooo speshul!” argument sounds like FI-based pussy pandering.
LikeLike
The Inuits understood the Gamer Maxim: “Pussy is just pussy.”
LikeLike
The injun tracker in Last of the Mohicans disparagingly spat at the colonial white knight ‘you English are like dogs to your women . From the era when movies were consistently laced with the knowledge of patriarchs.
LikeLike
Dot Indians today frown upon female babies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As do the Chinese.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shit, just google “female infanticide”.
LikeLike
Female children have eggs, even if those children haven’t reached puberty. Eggs just aren’t all that important for some societies…really, only for societies where chivalry existed.
Most eggs are discarded in any case…just not that important. Only a few eggs are used in reproduction.
Women chase alphas…betas chase women…that’s the order of value…that’s what we see in the field…our empirical evidence…eggs are irrelevant and economic theories based on their supposed supreme importance are just theoretical bullshit.
One might say that alphas are revealed by their mindset that “Pussy is just pussy.”
LikeLike
Nice guys are horrifyingly bad fathers. They will go power tripping on their own children, and the change in character is like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde played out in reality. Women want healthily fun fathers, not pathetic discipline dads guaranteed to rear blue pill sons, either from genetics or from a brutal environment.
Freud of all people figured this out. Even intellectual nerdy Jews at one time knew the game. Now nearly everyone is clueless and children have extremely low social status, probably the lowest in recorded history. See Rotherham and queer adoptions of children, etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice guys that have children to disrespectful, overbearing, etc. wives, disproportionately produce sons with mommy issues.
Thus damning the next generation of males (and beyond) with hellish prospects when it comes to the opposite sex.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Men uncertain of their position and authority will kick down at anyone available as a demonstration of status in the eyes of women, even when it means “castrating” their own sons. Alpha dads don’t see their alpha sons as competitors or easy targets but as an additional demonstration of their fitness.
We legitimately need more alpha males who love children, big families with lots of children. Women will risk screwing with a complete loser omega just for a shot at alpha. Neotenous beta males take childishness for granted and do not see the value of their own children, or children in general.
I suspect that about 300 years of rank and file unskilled mass warfare ruined the genetic quality of the West. The Catholic church was right even long before gunpowder when it damned the use of crossbows. Dumbed down warfare selected for docile, obedient cucks instead of heroes.
LikeLike
Witness nu-male soyboys:
LikeLike
@ Anonymous Fake
you described that scenario perfectly
have seen exactly that situation many many times but could never articulated it that well.
LikeLike
but i do have to add one thing
dads like that aren’t nice guys at all. they are far from it.
the only people who are fooled by their nice guy game are casual acquaintances, coworkers, strangers, etc.
at their core, they are weak selfish manipulative assholes and everyone who gets close to them learns that real fast.
speaking from experience, spending a lot of time with people like that when you’re a young person can really mess you up. hell, it’s hard to handle now. imagine being a kid dealing with that.
LikeLike
Agreed.
Excellent point.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Because niceguys excuse women’s shitholistic behavior.
Then they graduate to full White Knight status.
LikeLike
Somewhat related. Walking through a dark parking lot recently. Mostly empty. A few cars here and there, no foot traffic. I’m not going to win any bodybuilding shows anytime soon, but I’m not a small man.
I passed close by a car I thought was empty. Almost ran into a woman walking around the other side as she got out. I clearly took her by surprise.
The look on her face spoke of mounting terror and arousal. You could see she was scared to suddenly be all alone in a dark place w a strange man 2x her size. But you could literally hear her getting wet.
I see the look in her eyes and give her a weak smile as I step around her. In that instant I could see the look on her face. Total disgust lol. There she was getting worked up about being raped in a parking lot, and I had to ruin it by smiling at her.
Just another reminder that women despise niceguys.
LikeLike
Next, suppress the smile, and simply grunt, “Gimme yer number.”
LikeLike
Or–the disgust was because you didn’t look where you were going, almost ran into her, and scared her half to death. (Until you smiled, all she felt was fear.) If you “could literally hear her getting wet”, your hamster is having auditory hallucinations.
LikeLike
This is the response I would expect from someone who has never seen arousal or fear on a woman’s face. Lesson for you for today: They’re almost identical.
LikeLike
I think purple dragon is right… often it’s hard to tell the difference between male and female hamsters when they’re running the wheel.
LikeLike
Thx for sharing. I know that feel, bro.
Space Viking is exactly right, I have seen it a thousand times.
The let-down and contempt women feel, upon learning whom they are dealing with: a nice guy.
LikeLike
“Oh so you’re not going to grab me by the shoulders and have your way with little helpless me?
Well then spit-on-you and your worthless genetic garbage. There are plenty of [n_gs spics wops] who will do exactly that!”
Women’s mating behavior is more and more r-selected until they literally go the North Africa and expose themselves to be raped (see for example a thousand examples).
Like female sharks (the fish, not the synecdoche) do.
They get beat up and raped and reproduced and that’s how they roll. Good times!
LikeLike
Fuckin clear and concise and on point, dude. Good writing, Well done.
LikeLike
I despise “nice guys”, because they get into it with girls and bitchiness. They think they can get a girl by outbitching, outinsta-ing, outsmarming, outsmirking. They fall right into female frame. You can’t outgirl a girl. So, hypergamy goes unsatisfied, and low and behold, there are twice as many bitchy cunts in the world. What’s there to like in a nice guy?
LikeLike
Over the weekend, I had an epic argument with my solipsistic sister while we were both visiting my parent’s place.
I made a comment to my, now elderly father on how he should handle the shitty, stupid or just plain manipulative behaviour that my mother regularly exhibits.
Of course sister had to chime in and she began to drag out all the old dot points that she has stored away and brings out whenever she wants to “make her point” by completely ignoring the subject at hand and instead aims to push my buttons to the point where I will lose my sh*t, call her a bunch of expletives and then have my father on her side; thus leading me to “lose the argument”.
Well … not this time baby.
Other than giving her the middle finger (up close and personal), and feigning anger (I was fairly pissed off anyway); I told her that she was being highly manipulative, that she was used to having her way because “she might be the boss at her place but not here baby”,
that she was bringing up sh*t that had nothing to do with the matter at hand, that her “solutions” to me being angry were idiotic and that she was projecting.
I used the tried and tested tool of agree and amplify.
Having her on the verge of tears; I responded with ….. Ohhh I’m sorry was I being unfair and insensitive!!??
Then I left the room and let her stew.
I have a feeling that her husband is in a state of resigned acceptance and prefers to go with the flow than to kick up a stink and call her out unless he really, really has to ….. which some 20 years of marriage is rarely.
Let’s face it gentlemen, we are all but drowning in the Societal Feminine Enablement Imperative.
Though armed with Red Pill knowledge, skills, strategy and tactics one can fight the good fight.
LikeLike
The hamster constantly probes for weakness.
The more weakness it finds the more it probes.
The hamster also knows that mere “niceness” is often/usually a cover for weakness.
Strength, competence and performance do not need to be nice; they speak for themselves and speak far louder than “nice”.
They speak directly to the p*ssy and also make the hamster spin.
Nice only speaks to the cash register of their souls.
Nice that cannot deliver benefits and/or resources is quickly dumped.
LikeLike
Nice guys nearly always make the fatal error of assuming that women are rational, reasonable and fair.
LikeLike
…… until it is far too late.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Also nice guys are too polite to fuck her caveman style
LikeLike
@Litchoff: Would you like English or Western Pleasure?
LikeLike
A simplifying rule to follow is “Never help any woman unless you’re banging her.”
Of course, you may make exceptions. But the baseline default should always be that you don’t do it.
I found this rule to save me a lot of time and hassle, not to mention get more bangs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wha, you only got so many “helps” in your karma bank?
Ah helps anyone who needs it, to be honest… be he/she old or young, black or White… I fear God and you never know where He sends His angels.
I think a better philosophy is “never help any woman thinking it will get you in her pants.”
But some of youse yeggs gotta stretch your souls more, if you ask me…
… and even if’n you don’t ask me. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Recently took a gal who is a bit of a shitgiver out to a nice joint. We’d hung out before. No real fireworks in the sack but she made for good company. Anyhow, at leaving I paid the bill, and yes, I paid the bill. I’m a notorious prick so its one of the concessions I make from time to time. At which time she opens the Goddamn tab folder to see what I left for a tip. Which,being a bartender my entire adult life is always ample and in cash. I look at her and bark “THE FUCK YOU DOING?!” to which she replies something about just making sure.. Whatever stupid shit. I curtly say “you’re a grown woman. You know better than that. I expect you to show some fucking class”. Her eyes wiiide open and unspeaking we walk out. To her getting to the truck and leaping on me dtf in a way she hadn’t realized until 5 minutes earlier. Moments later, same girl I’d had a couple times before, not the same getdown I assure you. She had her reason to really put it all out there. Anyhow, same story that’s been told a million times before. Same lesson. CALL THOSE BITCHES OUT ON THEIR SHIT. Do it. If Aziz quit trying to sweet talk starfuckers into letting him eat their pussies and gave that retarded bobo skeezer a solid “you’re not here to be my new friend” he would get to keep be the limp wristed tiny brown darling of the pussyhat snatch scene and actually enjoy the fruits instead of now being the punchline to the joke that is me tooism
LikeLike
Isn’t it ironic how women always complain about “creepy guys” hitting on them in bars yet they still expect guys to make all the first moves in approaching? What they actually want is for only guys who are out of their league to approach them. That means if they are a 7 then only guys who are 8 or more may approach. All other men are considered “creeps”.
LikeLike
[…] Chateau Heartiste’s “The Main Reason Women Despise Nice Guys” […]
LikeLike