• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« As America Tribalizes, Politics Becomes Less About Patronage And More About Race
The Blight Side Of History: Single Mommery Edition »

A Test Of Your Game: Reader Responses

January 31, 2018 by CH

In the “A Test Of Your Game: The Lonesome Threesome” post, readers stepped up and provided myriad solutions, some effective some not so much, to the problem of a girl devoting more of her attention to her phone than to her date.

I promised I would recap the best responses, so here they are in no particular order of pickup artistry or date management skill.

Many readers suggests that our meek beta male being upstaged by an iPhag should “flirt with the cute girl behind the counter”.

This is basically Dread Game, and it works because it taps into women’s irresistible need to be with men whom other women want to be with, and their fear of losing those kind of men to other women. It’s a perfectly fine catch-all answer, but it’s neither immediate nor direct (given that it relies on a cute girl being present who will accept your flirtations and banter with you in front of your date), so a lot has to be in place for it to have the desired effect on your date.

***

Many other readers opted for a more aggressive response — variations on the pimp hand, ultimatums, leaving her with a huge check, grabbing her phone and passing it to a stranger/tossing it in the trash/shoving it under your crotch, buying a donut and placing it on her head while saying “a crown fit for a princess”, pulling a Stone Cold Steve Austin move (hi, whorefinder), taking a dump in front of her, etc etc — which, while personally satisfying, aren’t good Game. Use only if you want to go home smiling without her.

A general rule is that the best responses to a iPhag whore will be from a place of amused mastery rather than anger or butthurtiness.

***

“Ghost” was the most frequent suggestion.

This is an understandable reaction, and probably the best bet for men who lack the skill to jump-start a bad date but don’t like being so publicly humiliated by a woman. As a reader wrote, ““Just get up and walk out” is a perfectly good option if you already failed hard enough for it to end up like this.”

Ghosting is easy and time-saving, and there’s a small chance it refocuses the girl’s attention after the fact. However, there are better resolutions with much higher odds of closing the deal. Imagine you have time to burn and love a challenge, and you can see why ghosting isn’t an inviting option.

CH Maxim #92: Almost every bad date scenario is salvageable.

It’s just a question of how much effort you’re willing to spend to turn it around, (which itself is a question of how many plates you have concurrently spinning).

***

Sentient has one of the best variations on the “take her phone away from her” theme:

“Cool phone!!! Let me see…

Put in pocket.

As I was saying…”

Yes I’ve done it. Solid move. If she balks tell her “it’s grown up time”.

You’re living dangerously once you make a #MeToo move on a girl’s phone, so be prepared for her to bitch you out or scream and alert any nearby white knights. Mostly I liked Sentient’s response for the line “it’s grown up time”.

***

A Student of the Game,

Take a photo of her and text it to her with the caption, “I’m about to walk out on this shitty date.”

Haha. That’s funny-aggressive, which is better than just aggressive.

***

Schockenheimer,

“Hey! Eyes up here, not on my dick pic.”

“What?”

“Put your porn away.”

Frame locked in. Banter away…

Funny, jerkish, assumes the sale. “You can stop pretending to look at your phone while checking out my crotch.” Good stuff.

***

Steve Silver,

Stand up. Grab her phone. Start dancing whilst making a Snapchat story. Go take selfies with other ppl at the restaurant. Say, “okay okay, you can have your phone back.” Start to hand it to her, “but not yet.” Make another snap of you thrusting your pelvis into the phone. “Ok, here you go.” Start to hand her the phone, but as she puts her hand out, pull the phone back, lick it, then hand it to her.

You can’t go wrong with “children’s games” Game, (because women are in fact overgrown children).

***

Phelps gets ahed of me and suggests the table-turning response that I prefer,

Move my chair around to her side to read over her shoulder, giving jerkboy commentary the entire time.

If she tries to playfully hide it, wrestle with her to see. If she gets pissy, leave.

I did this once with a girl…

“hmm interesting….haven’t met too many girls who browse Playgirl on their phones….”

***

Anonymous, similar to the above,

“Are you googling what to say when your nervous on a first date with a hunk?”

I would’ve said “serial killer” instead of “hunk” for the xxxtra lulz (and tingles).

***

O Patriarca writes,

It begins way before the video. First he should take his hands off his vagina, and learn to sit like a man and not like a neutered lap dog.

True.

I’d throw crumbs or pieces of napkin at her if I was feeling playful. Dripped in saliva for extra fun.

Playfulness is a guaranteed winner.

I actually don’t mind when my woman is on the phone. Gives some respite from the chatterbox, one can just survey the room and think about my own stuff.

This is fine when with a girlfriend, not so much when on a first or second date.

***

Hawk has a good comment about calibrating your response to the type of girl who’s with you and the type of reaction you expect to provoke in her,

The ability to correct the behavior is proportional to the frame you can hold.

Butt hurt: order everything on the menu and leave for her to pay. She’ll look down on you failing the shit test.

Ghost: walkout and say nothing. More neutral but won’t be able to generate tingles.

Tease: variations on taking the phone away and playfully negging her. Thus combines physical and verbal. The taking of the phone is an alpha male entitled response but the verbal play has to be THOT appropriate. The more she’s acting like a brat the more kid sister is your response. The more she’s acting like a bitch, the meaner and more ZFG is your response.

Nuclear: grab phone and point at your own groin and yell: “does this have a wide angle lens?” Audience laughs and social proof is gained. She’ll blush and look at your groin. Seed planted in her mind.

LOL at the Nuclear Frame option. This is a great general insight about Game that applies to all situations, not just iPhagged first dates. Jerkboy Game and assholery should be tailored to the bitchiness of the girl; a real bitch deserves…no, NEEDS….a real asshole to make her feel anything other than boredom and inflated self-regard. Less bitchy but equally annoying girls will respond better to playfulness and teasing.

***

One other table-turner I do is a tried and true Game stand-by: I’ll text her a big, beautiful, “8===D~~~”. She’ll get the idea, and either put her phone away and play nice or act pissed that I invaded her iPhag space, (which would be my cue to leave without saying goodbye, satisfied that I avoided further entanglement with a yuge kunt).

***

Finally, there’s this:

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Funny/Lolblogs, Game, Videos | 97 Comments

97 Responses

  1. on January 31, 2018 at 3:55 pm The Judge

    Just leave.

    LikeLike


    • on January 31, 2018 at 5:25 pm Captain Obvious

      Judging from the severity of the iPhag addiction in the original video, I don’t think any verbal repartee stands a snowball’s chance in he11 unless you scream it at the top of your lungs [which means that everyone in the eatery will hear you]. When iPhag addiction is this all-consuming, you’re gonna hafta do something physical to draw her attention. Or else follow her into Clownworld on your iPhag, which is admitting defeat.

      This is what a date in 2018 looks like: pic.twitter.com/dYSzBo1ajN

      — 5th Year (@5thYear) January 30, 2018

      LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 5:32 pm Captain Obvious

        Reading the kkk0mments on the original Lonesome Threesome thread, I was left with the distinct impression of a kkk0mmentariat which is more familiar with the 30-ish chicks [born circa 1988 = late Reagan] rather than the teenaged chicks [born late-Bubba/early-Dubya].

        For the teenaged set, iPhag addiction is all they’ve ever known, and it forms pretty much the totality of their existence. These girls will stay up until 2AM on school nights just mindlessly Snapchatting & Instagramming and then turn right around and try to take an AP exam at high skrewl at 7AM.

        LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 10:07 pm Jay in DC

        Agreed Cap’n. There was a lot of comments that were clearly from people who either don’t understand the zeitgeist (i.e. your generational gap) or have never dated this demographic and seen how acute this problem is. It read like advice you “think” would work based on game from over a decade ago.

        Spill your fucking drink on her. I promise you this works to get her attention, but not much else. When you are already in a situation as jacked as the one in the video you may as well go down swinging. A concept lost on the beta supplicants here.

        LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 10:28 pm cortesar

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 8:57 am Maple Curtain

        As someone who is now past 50, with daughters/nieces in this age cohort, I am in agreement with CO/Jay about a generation gap informing our response to the girl wedded to the phone and ignoring her human companions (in any social setting).

        These young girls are completely addicted to the technology and the attention that it gives them, so I understand the challenge. Still, they are also completely devoid of self-esteem (whatever you go grrrrllll has been programmed into them by society) because they have absolutely no skills or accomplishments – that leaves them highly vulnerable to manipulation by a thinking man.

        I have jokingly removed phones from these young women’s hands on a pretext and they usually go along because they know they are addicted and are being anti-social.

        If I were dating, however, I would favour a direct approach – put the phone away and talk to me or the date is over.

        Seems to me that anything other than her submitting to your demand is capitulation to her frame, and you never want to go down that road with a woman…

        Incidentally, I have never been a player, but I am highly intelligent and accomplished, and any woman with which I have had a relationship has always known, either instinctively, or at the first shit test, that I set the frame in the relationship.

        O course, I was raised by an emotionally/physically abusive shrew, so I have always known that life is utter hell around the wrong sort of woman…those who had sane, loving mothers are probably a lot more vulnerable to pedestalization.

        Anyway, get her to submit to you, immediately, or kick her to the curb (figuratively, of course).

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 1, 2018 at 9:05 am plumpjack

        “I was raised by an emotionally/physically abusive shrew, so I have always known that life is utter hell around the wrong sort of woman…those who had sane, loving mothers are probably a lot more vulnerable to pedestalization.

        Anyway, get her to submit to you, immediately, or kick her to the curb (figuratively, of course).”

        if I was more intelligent I would have said the exact same thing.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 1, 2018 at 10:03 am Captain Obvious

        “I was raised by an emotionally/physically abusive shrew”

        And yet you exist, and persist.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 10:08 am plumpjack

        “And yet you exist, and persist.”

        that was another thought I had. I bet some of the best warriors/womanizers/teachers/fathers started out life inside the womb of untameable, manipulative women. I know at least one.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 10:16 am Captain Obvious

        “untameable, manipulative women”

        PJ, below here I just poasted a bunch of blather about Biological Calvinism, and on the previous thread, I was trying to warn dudes that Anglos & J00z might keep rising to the top of the heap because their mothers are masculine ball-busters who are raising hyper-masculine little boyz to go forth & slay the Normies.

        And with Maple Curtain, yeah, his Mom was a ball-buster, but in her defense, she raised a son who ain’t gonna curl up & start sucking his thumb & piss in his pants at the first sign of a Sh!t Test.

        tl;dr == Never try to second-guess the Red Queen. She is one dark, cold, evil, heartless b!tch.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 10:25 am Captain Obvious

        De Vere knew it:

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 10:32 am Captain Obvious

        For those who aren’t familiar with De Vere: You are the child of Mother Nature & Father Time, and it’s your Dad whom your Mom is fighting with here [and trying to “disgrace”], until she finally turns and levels her wrath at you.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 10:36 am Sean Fielding

        @maple curtain: good comment, but IMO you’re by far an exception, not a rule. Adult life is basically a continuation of high school: intelligence and social confidence show mostly an inverse correlation. Fortunately, the god of biomechanics has seen fit to alter post-high school in two ways that can benefit greater betas. On the female side, there’s a fair bit of interchange between high school 8-9 and twenties 6-7 (mostly downgrading, but some up). On the male side, smart guys can eventually leverage their earnings and so on into social confidence IF they learn game (most won’t).

        You’re also an exception in being raised by a single shrew but learning, or maybe imbibing, game anyway. The ideal childhood for a player is a masculine dad and the more brothers the better, with at least one sister to tease. If Dad teases Mom a lot, so much the better. That way you learn early the various strategies for competing in a man’s world – joker, strong/silent, athlete, etc – and you also learn that women are mere accessories to most of what really needs doing (except child-rearing of course).

        The problem with being raised by a single mom (plus an older sister in my case – horrors) is that she’s still Mother. Even if you’re a natural shitlord (I wasn’t), she’s still the authority figure. Of the wrong sex.

        I figure there are two kinds of sons-of-single-moms out there. There are the sons of alpha cads who never really committed to the mother, and the sons of beta dads the mother eventually couldn’t stand. The former take until about age 30 to recover from having an authority figure of the wrong sex (unless Dad was an actual felon). The latter are lucky if they ever recover. I did but it literally required half a century and this blog. CH is doing God’s work, and heh – I say that as an atheist.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 1, 2018 at 10:50 am plumpjack

        interesting stuff, cap.

        I’ve had a theory that people who experienced some kind of trauma while very young often have those genes switched on. something about being made of your mortality at a young age (2-3yo) gets them started on the path of questioning everything around them. and INSIDE of them. ie, questioning what their true nature is, and what kind of life would facilitate living in accordance with that.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 11:00 am plumpjack

        made *aware of their mortality

        cap, I thought I was replying to your elucidation of biological Calvinism, but my comment works here also.

        IOW, having an abusive parent can actually be an asset in some cases. it tempers a strong spirit from a young age. and maybe that’s the whole point of the war between mothers and sons, women and men, etc. it’s by design, to make us stronger.

        you’re not SUPPOSED to like your Mom, or your wife, and she’s not SUPPOSED to like you either. you’re SUPPOSED to earn each other’s respect through fighting, bravely, and passing each other’s shit tests over and over until you can both have a good laugh about it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 11:07 am Captain Obvious

        PJ, it would be fascinating if the Frankfurt School made epic miscalculations when

        1) Roe & Griswold removed the Insula-Dominant/Amygdala-Submissive genes [i.e. the genes of the Frankfurt Schol’s natural slaves] from the White race, and

        2) The 1965 Immigration Act triggered the awakening of ancient “recessive” genes for tribal bloodletting & democidal nihilism in the White race.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 11:12 am Captain Obvious

        PJ, I also agree with you that there’s a lot to be said for these Sturm-und-Drang Trial-by-Fire experiences.

        Plus, in the case of your w!fe [if not your Mom], the make-up sex is off-the-charts.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 12:07 pm vfm#7634

        “iPhag”

        Actually used this word the other day. She giggled and put away the iPhag.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 10:54 pm King

        Ease up with the De Vere-was-Shakespeare idiocy. It doesn’t make you appear to be “in the know” as much as you think it does; in fact, it has the opposite effect. Have you ever encountered a conspiracy theory you didn’t immediately adopt?

        LikeLike


  2. on January 31, 2018 at 3:56 pm Stake From Jake Jarm

    dayam, that girl in the video.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on January 31, 2018 at 4:19 pm Ironsides

      She usually goes on the attack, physically, within a second or two. Funny video, and I could watch her getting air-horned for hours, but she looks like a ghastly wench to be around.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on January 31, 2018 at 7:37 pm Mr. Rational

        That’s when you palm-heel her just below the union of the collarbones.

        Knock her off-balance and force her to realize the disparity of physical power.

        LikeLike


    • on January 31, 2018 at 5:44 pm Mob Barley

      She’s nice.
      Staged video tho?

      LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 6:56 pm mendo

        It had that quality about it. Especially when in the car. Though staged, she still wasn’t sure when the airhorn would blare.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 1:36 pm Major7

        Also the popcorn gag. She grabs the bowl and tosses it. Staged, but still damn funny.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 11:08 pm King

        That video wasn’t staged in the slightest. Once again I’m left in awe at the absence of basic detection skills among this set of otherwise trenchant social observers. Such a deficiency has to make your game a couple degrees of difficulty harder.

        Same with the original pastry store video. There is something very significant about the guy and the girl that we aren’t being told. It’s not a simple date. It has a brother-sister vibe, or friends of a friend waiting for their mutual acquaintance to return. We enter in media res, and there is no evidence of either participant’s intent, much less of a failed attempt at romance. We are clearly missing something.

        I know that wasn’t the point of the “exercise,” but it’s odd for no one to incorporate such a glaring possibility into his commentary.

        LikeLike


    • on January 31, 2018 at 8:41 pm Stake From Jake Jarm

      and this is a counter point…it’s all cute when hotn’sexy internet girl friend of internet couple goes all hitty.

      BUT. I was just listening to local evening talk on rock radio (like a morning show for 3rd shift…bawltimoar hun) and there’s a segment tonight of guys who caughts their girl cheating and they attack the guy doing the catching and the guy gets arrested. Like it was one sad sack and the DJ’s were like, whoa, we’re getting a ton of callers with the same story.

      One bitch was covered in fucksecks scratches and she blamed them on the cuckold. So, it’s not cute anymore if the govt has decided to weaponize our seckes. Of course, our new hispanic overlords may be more…progre4ssive on this point, but who knows.

      LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 9:05 pm Stake From Jake Jarm

        I need to go to zoolanders school to learn to talk good…the GIRL ATTACKS THE CUCK…cuck goes to jail

        LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 10:12 pm Jay in DC

        I had guns pointed at my head by guys in black ski masks and body armor with shiny badges of the state for sending a fucking text message to a butthurt brown beta guy, and my life basically shredded to ribbons as well.

        I have NO doubt this is becoming “a thing”. White guys are always going to be the suspect and locked up, and many times by white males. Never think the police are on your side or your friends, these days they are mainly sociopaths on the payroll. I worked with them for years, I know the type well. That is why they select for middle IQ at best. Easier to train and not question “why” things are as they are.

        Lay your hand on a female or a minority at your own peril white man, or for that matter even BREATH the words you are going to inflict violence on either. Go ahead, I dare you. We are in a soft prison state now. Think of it as nation-wide house arrest, as it pretty much is a fitting description.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on January 31, 2018 at 10:22 pm Jay in DC

        EDIT: I may not have been clear but you can be defending against a woman and your ass is still going to get collared for it. Not even talking about hitting or even restraining actually.

        Like the story said, if she simply states you assaulted her well… #metoo. You get it. MGTOW I use to make fun of, but given the high stakes today it may be more of a survival strategy.

        Women are turning this into a harem of their own creation. Top 15% guys will be slamming 90% of the trim and get away with it. Bottom 85% will be holding their dicks. Revolutions -can- start this way, let’s see if whitey has any fight left in him for it. Certainly not millenials, if Gen Z doesn’t let that hate into their heart we are going to the history books.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 12:05 am skorzecin150

        https://www.minds.com/api/v1/media/781289386271580177/play

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 5:29 am Scanman

        Mr. Bond is some high quality stuff.

        LikeLike


  3. on January 31, 2018 at 3:59 pm Stake From Jake Jarm

    I suppose it depends on your age. if you’re a kid, I guess this is normal and you’ll just have fucksex because you’re a weird nihilist after your required 2 hours of quiet time together in public.

    If gen-x on date with millenial girl, then you can do the above moves, eh? Dates, or hangouts, should be a little bit more fun than sit sad in food court.

    if boomer, just die.

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on February 1, 2018 at 11:17 pm King

      The point of CH’s “test” is to improvise a way out of an awkward social situation. Importing excuses and rationalizations is beside the point. No kidding that iGen zombies are infamous for their vapid interaction and phone addiction. CH was trying to inspire a discussion about the best way to deal with that asocial phenomenon, not a round of repetitive chortling about “kids these days.”

      LikeLike


      • on February 2, 2018 at 8:40 am anon

        lzolzozloz check out this bizarre (((taunt))) re: McCarthy (((they))) trotted out today:

        All should appreciate the FBI speaking up. I wish more of our leaders would. But take heart: American history shows that, in the long run, weasels and liars never hold the field, so long as good people stand up. Not a lot of schools or streets named for Joe McCarthy.

        — James Comey (@Comey) February 1, 2018

        Actually, McCarthy was right and should have streets named after him after we win this war.

        Please get this through mod. I can’t use my normal handle where I am right now.

        Things are getting weird.

        LikeLike


    • on February 2, 2018 at 1:12 pm trav777

      my kids are around this age and they are glued to these things. Was their mom who bought them these cursed devices.

      If I’m on a date and a bitch shows this level of disrespect, I’m out. But the only girl I ever had excessively smartphone on a date was a stripper. She was probably lining up tricks on it. A girl of this age group is far too interested in what I have to say and where we are going to be using her phone. But if you lull the entertainment, bang, they simply are addicted to these things, by design

      LikeLike


  4. on January 31, 2018 at 4:05 pm Hackett To Bits

    That video: Chicks love a**holes…

    LikeLike


  5. on January 31, 2018 at 4:10 pm Hackett To Bits

    Stand right in front of her, like this:

    LikeLike


  6. on January 31, 2018 at 4:26 pm Southern WASP

    Laugh at her, then tell her she needs to work on her social skills.

    LikeLike


    • on January 31, 2018 at 5:34 pm Captain Obvious

      She won’t hear you.

      She won’t notice you.

      She’s long since forgotten that you’re even sitting across the table from her.

      You’re misunderestimating the omnipotent power of iPhag addiction.

      LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 5:46 pm Mob Barley

        Not all Heroin addicts recover. But some do.
        It’s a numbers game. Like all things game.

        LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 6:02 pm plumpjack

        gen z shitlords will look back on early gamesters as being far too tolerant of entitled, addicted, civilization-wrecking twats who act like this. there won’t be any “playful teasing”.

        step 1: “put the phone down”.

        step 2: “you’re a whore”.

        step 3: him and his buddies throw her out a window.

        seriously. the now-fading type of game we’ve grown used to won’t age well. eventually all shitlords will agree that these whores deserve no quarter. or they need medical treatment.

        her “tingles” will not be relevant.

        her TINGLES are what got us into this mess in the first place.

        LikeLiked by 6 people


      • on January 31, 2018 at 6:13 pm Captain Obvious

        PJ, I’m saying that, if the iPhag addiction is as bad as it looks in the video, then she ain’t even gonna be aware of Steps 1 & 2.

        It’s only Step 3 which will get her attention [at least until the nurse in the Surgery ICU gives her back the iPhag].

        LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 6:24 pm plumpjack

        Cap, yeah. i agree. there’s gonna be a lot of “skip straight to step 3″s.

        it’s the fastest way to begin the slow process of rewiring her brain for dealing with meat world.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 10:19 am Les Saunders, Protestant

        Afraid you’re right.

        At best you might get a “hmm…?” a minute or two after you’ve said something witty (which will not register anyways and she’ll still be staring at the screen).

        LikeLike


      • on February 2, 2018 at 1:13 pm trav777

        concur…women prefer these things to real relationships; that is truly how insidious they are.

        Look, you’re a real person she has to interact with instead of getting nonstop ego gratification and a little endorphin high from Like!

        LikeLike


    • on February 1, 2018 at 11:27 pm King

      She won’t hear you. She won’t notice you. She’s long since forgotten that you’re even sitting across the table from her. You’re misunderestimating the omnipotent power of iPhag addiction.

      You can trot out this doomsaying no matter how someone suggests the guy handles the hypothetical. We all understand the antisocial addiction to the screen that has overturned normal human interaction in the last ten years. It is everywhere, and it isn’t just Millennials.

      We’re supposed to be figuring out how to deal with the phenomenon (or how to eradicate it). Kvetching doesn’t help at all. The assumption that nobody understands just how bad the addiction has gotten is unfounded and at any rate irrelevant to the exercise.

      LikeLike


  7. on January 31, 2018 at 5:48 pm Vernon

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/classic-apps/brigette-adams-became-the-poster-child-for-freezing-your-eggs-but-things-didnt-quite-work-out-how-she-imagined/2018/01/27/ff55857a-e667-11e7-833f-155031558ff4_story.html

    LikeLike


    • on January 31, 2018 at 6:57 pm mendo

      Yeah. That friggin article is hilarious. Good pick me up laugh for those that need it.

      No joke…well, I mean, you know what I mean.

      LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 7:17 pm Vagina dominator

        This para in the article is really the kicker for me:

        “In an *unfortunate and unfair* twist of nature, men are believed to replenish their sperm at a rate of 1,500 a second through most of their lives; there are documented cases of men remaining fertile into their 90s. Age also affects the quality of sperm, according to numerous studies. But the effect on fertility is markedly less dramatic than in women.”

        Why would this be *unfortunate*? And in what way *unfair*? And how is it a “twist of nature”? It *is* nature.

        This is like saying it is unfair an unfortunate that birds have wings and can fly and I do not.

        What a bizarre and solipsistic mindset. As a way of looking at things, it is borderline psycho.

        LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2018 at 7:34 pm Vagina dominator

        Actually this might make a thigh-slapping Hollywood movie. Think about it, “Brigitte Joneses Eggs” meets “Three Eggs and a Grandma”.

        The hilarious story of a post-wall former human resources executive’s attempt to unfreeze her 20-year old eggs and have octuplets by eight different men all of different races in time for Christmas against all the resources of the patriarchy. A heartwarming story for the whole family. Or something.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on January 31, 2018 at 7:52 pm Gershom

      Lol. These women sure are dumb. Better if they don’t reproduce.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 1, 2018 at 11:29 pm King

        They’re not dumb. They’ve been cruelly misled. This is a failure of white men, to allow this situation ever to emerge in the first place.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 11:52 pm Diversity Is Good

        They’re not dumb. They’ve been cruelly misled.

        They are dumb and misled.

        This is a failure of white menknights, to allow this situation ever to emerge in the first place.

        FIFY.

        LikeLike


    • on February 1, 2018 at 1:55 am Sean Fielding

      It’s given to few men, and almost no women to understand what they really ARE. It takes a grim willingness to accept Biological Calvinism. In this age, the kind of woman who would wait til 35 to even start planning for children, and 44 to try, was highly unlikely to find a husband and have a family in the first place. If you knew her life story you could see the key evidence here and there at every stage from earliest childhood, and back to the character of her parents. Few things in life are inevitable, but a lot come damn close.

      LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 5:03 am plumpjack

        does biological Calvinism preclude the influence of culture?

        and is the culture subject to biological Calvinism also?

        asking for a friend.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 9:51 am Captain Obvious

        PJ, Biological Calvinism says that almost all aspects of our nature – moral, spiritual, psychological – are largely burned into our DNA at conception, and that we have barely any Freedom of the Will even when it comes to the ultimate question of D@mnation versus Salvation.

        As SF is indicating, there have always been strains of a Dark but fatuous & purposeless nihilism in Our Race, which doubtless survived simply because copulation was just too d@mned much fun [even for the nihilists], but which, status post Griswold & Roe, are quickly unbreeding themselves out of existence. [Or maybe these strains survived because, in the uglier darwinian situations, nihilism allowed its gene-bearers to perform atrocities which the Normies simply couldn’t stomach.]

        In a perfectly pristine & untouched human ecosystem, the Culture will be the Biology and the Biology will be the Culture – the two are simply inseparable. But of course we’ve had a largely foreign anti-culture for a good century or more now [The Tribe seized control of the New York Times in 1896, after the financial panic of 1893 – “Never let a good crisis go to waste” – and it was a Quaker traitor who facilitated the deal], so none of us on this blog today have ever witnessed anything close to a natural relationship between Culture & Biology [assuming there aren’t any nonagenarians or centarians au Chateau].

        And there’s no question but that this Foreign Anti-Culture has taken a tremendous toll on the Left side of the White bell curve for [what we perceive to be] the “d@mnable/salvatory” genes of Biological Calvinism.

        On the other hand, never misunderestimate the power of recessive genes. They can lie there hidden for generations upon generations upon generations, until circumstances finally require those genes to reassert themselves.

        And this will be true even when it comes to the question of Salvation -vs- D@mnation: Those of us who, in our arrogance, fancy ourselves to be “Saved”, might very well be harboring the genes for D@mnation which are simply waiting very patiently for an excuse to take off the gloves and go Democidal on the muthaphuckaz.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 9:56 am Captain Obvious

        Francis Ford Coppola delved deep into many of these themes via Gary Oldham:

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 1:00 pm anon

        lolzozozo https://www.democraticleader.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/NoReplySharpCopier@US.HOUSE_.GOV_20180201_102148.pdf

        LikeLike


    • on February 1, 2018 at 4:06 am APL

      “In 2008, Lee was 37 and starting to think about children …”

      ‘Starting’ to think about having children at 37!!

      dating ” a Korean American engineer and entrepreneur, ”

      “But she was in Seattle and he was in Virginia,”

      Do these stupid broads go out of their way to fail at the one thing nature gives them, that they can do without any higher level thought at all?

      LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 1:59 pm bigjohn33

        Lol. And she still asks “what did I do wrong?”

        LikeLike


    • on February 1, 2018 at 3:48 pm Hugh Mann

      Apparently deciding at freeze your eggs at 37 while you work a few more years and find a great guy to marry turned out to be a stupid idea.

      Who woulda thunk it? Doesn’t every man want a 40 year old with a couple of hundred thousand miles on the clock?

      “Adams remembers feeling a wonderful sense of freedom after she froze her eggs in her late 30s, despite the $19,000 cost. Her plan was to work a few more years, find a great guy to marry and still have a house full of her own children.

      Things didn’t turn out the way she hoped.

      In early 2017, with her 45th birthday looming and no sign of Mr. Right, she decided to start a family on her own. She excitedly unfroze the 11 eggs she had stored and selected a sperm donor.

      Two eggs failed to survive the thawing process. Three more failed to fertilize. That left six embryos, of which five appeared to be abnormal. The last one was implanted in her uterus. On the morning of March 7, she got the devastating news that it, too, had failed.

      Adams was not pregnant, and her chances of carrying her genetic child had just dropped to near zero. She remembers screaming like “a wild animal,” throwing books, papers, her laptop — and collapsing to the ground.

      “It was one of the worst days of my life. There were so many emotions. I was sad. I was angry. I was ashamed,” she said. “I questioned, ‘Why me?’ ‘What did I do wrong?’ ””

      [CH: a totally preventable horror show. thanks, feministism!]

      LikeLike


  8. on January 31, 2018 at 7:10 pm Vagina dominator

    Why does he want her to put down the phone anyway? Is it time for her to make him a sammich?

    LikeLike


  9. on January 31, 2018 at 7:47 pm Gershom

    Damn, that video was laugh out loud funny.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  10. on January 31, 2018 at 7:53 pm gunslingergregi

    horn was good

    LikeLike


  11. on January 31, 2018 at 7:55 pm gunslingergregi

    don’t ever look more dickpics than ya know what to do with lololozlzolzolzolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    LikeLike


  12. on January 31, 2018 at 7:55 pm gunslingergregi

    Christ ex ex dudes from everywhere on facebook she tells em send money

    LikeLike


  13. on January 31, 2018 at 8:00 pm gunslingergregi

    actually the chicks saying sexual harassment should check they phones be funny

    LikeLike


  14. on January 31, 2018 at 8:02 pm gunslingergregi

    Move my chair around to her side to read over her shoulder, giving jerkboy commentary the entire time.””””””’

    never want to do that it could change your life he he he

    LikeLike


  15. on January 31, 2018 at 8:10 pm Hawk

    Happy to be quoted.

    The lesson as always is that game must be personalized. Rote function box responses are not reality.

    You must customize your game, young man.

    The phone predeliction is no different than other counters to female submissive behavior. Women need alpha. Women will fight alpha so as to prove alpha. Eork accordingly.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on February 1, 2018 at 9:37 am Hawk

      ^work accordingly.

      LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2018 at 11:33 pm King

        Never correct yourself. You might have just invented a new concept there if you bluffed your way through it. Don’t strangle your covfefes in the cradle.

        LikeLike


  16. on January 31, 2018 at 10:12 pm tripper

    That video is more staged than russian elections.

    LikeLike


  17. on January 31, 2018 at 10:21 pm Zarg Buell

    Pimp slap that shit right out of her hand, look her dead in the eye, and let the evil joy dominate your expression:

    LikeLiked by 2 people


    • on February 1, 2018 at 11:34 pm King

      Best LOL gif. GOAT

      LikeLike


  18. on January 31, 2018 at 10:26 pm Zarg Buell

    Alternatively, slap that shit across the room and look at her like this:

    https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactiongifs.com%2Fr%2FSLJ.gif&f=1

    LikeLike


    • on February 1, 2018 at 12:09 am skorzecin150

      Like a nigger zombie? No thanks.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 1, 2018 at 11:08 am Jay in DC

        I LOL’d at that skorz, and thanks for the “truth telling” police car pic up above, 100% on point w/ that.

        LikeLike


  19. on February 1, 2018 at 3:53 am O Patriarca

    Appreciate the mention

    Would be really nice if you could throw in the link to my red pill blog
    It’s in Portuguese, but I’m sure you have a lot of pt-speaking readers

    atavolaredonda.com

    thanks

    LikeLike


  20. on February 1, 2018 at 7:06 am Greg Eliot

    Wha, no luv for Candy Crush?

    (((shakin’ mah haid)))

    LikeLike


  21. on February 1, 2018 at 10:23 am Prof. Woland

    Some people are literally addicted to their phones. Taking one away is like taking away their crack pipe.

    LikeLike


    • on February 1, 2018 at 12:23 pm A.B. Prosper

      Its bad enough I’ve seen the pushers on the Internet showing rudimentary concern about the issue and its social consequences

      They won’t do anything about it of course but the faux concern in there

      Zombies make bad consumers and if no one has kids your long term business prospects aren’t so good

      Worse the only people having kids are either poor, think you can never be trusted or basically think you are a literal servant of Satan that’s not good. The later two might think you need a noose

      as for the police issue, the day White American feels the same way about the police that Blacks do and chooses to act on it is the day the system stops working

      It won’t in that sense be a new thing, ethnic “no go zones” have been around since “ethnics” have

      The only difference is these will be “White” no go zones versus Irish or Italian ones and will be backed by organized militias or organized crime

      And to note Gen Y and its widespread cowardice and weakness aside (not all of then though not by far) its closer than you think. Its why T.V is always filled with cop-aganda and agit-cop “entertainment”

      Its not fully here yet, White are still plugged into the system but it will be soon enough.

      LikeLike


  22. on February 1, 2018 at 12:51 pm Stake From Jake Jarm

    I had a lol thinking that all these bitches going “trump voters swipe left” are going to pretty lonely soon. sad!

    LikeLike


  23. on February 1, 2018 at 1:35 pm Stake From Jake Jarm

    wow did you see, I saw on cernovich’s feed, the graphic of sad beta white knights who droned on about ending Pit-Crew girls at F1 versus the actual hotchicks?

    LikeLike


  24. on February 1, 2018 at 1:40 pm Game Reconhecido: O Patriarca no Château Heartiste - Távola Redonda

    […] Os leitores perdoarão certamente a imodéstia deste post: é um orgulho ser reconhecido por um mestre. […]

    LikeLike


  25. on February 1, 2018 at 1:58 pm Oleaginous Outrager

    Vaguely on topic, re: the Numale Grimace:

    Good heavens 😟 pic.twitter.com/RgXZEotFU9

    — Orwell & Goode 🇨🇱 (@OrwellNGoode) February 1, 2018

    LikeLike


    • on February 1, 2018 at 11:36 pm King

      “Behold a pale horse tier”

      LikeLike


  26. on February 1, 2018 at 2:54 pm OldFart

    LOL

    LikeLike


    • on February 1, 2018 at 2:55 pm OldFart

      Source:

      http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02/01/grid-girl-hits-back-at-the-liberal-feminists-who-lobbied-formula-one-to-scrap-her-sexist-job/

      LikeLike


    • on February 2, 2018 at 2:55 am skorzecin150

      Just another example of how ugly, old, (((hags))) destroy beauty wherever they can. Jealousy runs strong with (((them))).

      It’s just a job for the girls, they like doing it, men like watching them do it. Win/win.

      Not a fan ,at all, of forumla 1, but I AM a fan of pretty girls in hot clothes. Not really waifu material, but pleasing to the eye nonetheless.

      LikeLike


  27. on February 1, 2018 at 4:04 pm gunslingergregi

    When women no longer needed marriage (because women were economically and reproductively self-sufficient), men no longer needed to barter marriage for sex. Now where have you read that before? Oh yeah…..HERE.””””””””’

    they not self sufficient at all though they using up some man slave or more than one mans whole early life. Child support alimony free food free housing free bills free healthcare all for having kids and raising em

    LikeLike


  28. on February 1, 2018 at 11:53 pm King

    Best entry was snap/“I’m about to walk out on this shitty date.” Or “It’s grown up time.”

    Her whole social world, her identity, her preferred method of interaction, and maybe even her sense of safety are all so conveniently concentrated into one little physical nexus, and she is dangling it out there almost as a dare. Why wouldn’t you grab it? It is an act of ultimate and total assertion. It is the psychological equivalent of stripping her down to her underwear in public.

    The social symbolism of the smartphone makes real interaction simpler, not more complicated — if you’re bold enough to be that guy, to wake people out of their trance. After they get over the shock of audacity and reflexive butthurt, the keepers actually thank you.

    That’s the one thing old-school Trump was wrong about: grab em by the samsung.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on February 4, 2018 at 6:19 am Kate

      Oh no, I’ve got another story idea! “Samsung and Delilah!” In a twist on the Biblical tale, she derives her power from her smartphone, only without which is she capable of fully falling in love 🙂

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  29. on February 2, 2018 at 2:18 am Straight

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-5340301/Loose-Women-slammed-interview-Jake-Quickenden.html
    Slutiness glorification in the UK…

    LikeLike


  30. on February 4, 2018 at 6:13 am Kate

    Funny vidja! But notice that she *still* doesn’t learn!!! The horn should be a pretty effective pattern interrupt, but the lure of the smartphone is too strong. Incidentally, my father used to honk a horn at the dinner table to get me out of the habit of saying “I know that” in response to corrections. So you know what I say now-even as an adult? “I know that, honk, honk.” LOLOL

    LikeLike


  31. on February 7, 2018 at 10:32 pm ShitlordRyan

    I didn’t particularly like any of the excerpted responses from the OP. I liked the post from the gentleman early in the comments who basically said: make the woman submit to your frame or your situation is untenable. That maxim must be remembered at the outset or all “suggestions” are folly.

    You’ve heard the old adage “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of the cure.” Truer words. So employ an ounce of prevention before the date, because the OP assumes you’re already needing a pound of the cure. Before a first date with a girl, the standard must be set that you do not abide her making out with her phone on your time, so drop an anecdote about “The last girl I went out with got all pissy because I was flirting with the cute bartender right in front of her, as if I was supposed to just sit there like a chump while she kept having text convos in front of me. Eventually a guy gets bored.” or something to that affect, but make the point: a.) I won’t tolerate the disrespect, and b.) if you do, I WILL shift my attentions to receptive female competition. This sets the precedent and doesn’t make you sound petty or vindictive; rather, you are a well-adjusted man exercises his bountiful options. DO NOT text something like this. SAY it to her. Texting such a thing would require obvious effort, whereas speaking it off-handedly is player.

    But if you fail to communicate this and/or she’s on her phone constantly anyway, your good options are very limited. First and best is, again, immediately start flirting with the nearest girl who offers the best combination of cuteness/receptiveness. If none are present, a good looking male would be the next best friendly conversation compatriot. If none are present, a less attractive female would be option three. If there are none of those either, you’re an idiot for picking a spot for a date apparently no one else wants to go.

    But, if you lack the confidence or social skills to strike up convos with randos while your girl texts away in front of you, you’re really gonna find yourself in the hot seat. Remember the mission: a.) she submits to your frame, b.) you don’t make it look like you’re trying too hard or are resentful/vindictive. Too many of the “suggestions” I read were way too try-hard or contrived. You must roll with it like she’s being the minor inconvenience she is. Some suggestions:
    1. if y’all already have drinks served, consider casually but conspicuously asking the server for the check. “Wait, we’re done?” will go through your date’s head. If she asks what’s up or are we leaving, casually reply, “Yeah, here in a few. I was trying to make time tonight but it looks like we both have other stuff going on. No biggie.” >wink<
    2. text her "bored. wyd?" ["what you doing?", for those confused]
    3. Ask her to let you see her phone for a sec. Put your phone and her phone face down on the table and say "Let's play a game so we can get to know each other. First person to touch their phone before the check arrives is a douchebag."
    4. Hail Mary option when you don't mind setting the date on fire but wouldn't mind sticking it out if she comes down off her pedestal: text her "Obama is such a fucking faggot" then act like it was a mistake you meant to send to someone else, but now she'll probably have something to say. This is a good one to keep in the chamber because if she's an insufferable SJW nagcunt, this will suss it out of her quick.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2018 at 10:38 pm gunslingergregi

      the phones are like crack they got to quit both to be human

      LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Captain Obvious on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Captain Obvious on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Amon Ra on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Captain Obvious on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Captain Obvious on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
    • Deep State Update: Keeping It In The Family For A Reason
    • This Is What Separate Dating Markets Are For (Or: White Vs Black Thirst)
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: