DEUSVULT wonders,
what is the lefts obsession on hating Christianity, but going balls deep in love with islam?
Less complex answer: Leftoids are cowards. It’s easier to insult people who won’t fight back.
More complex answer: Leapfrogging loyalty (a term coined by Steve Sailer iirc).
There are many psychological factors that explain leftist virtue sniveling, but one that I don’t see getting much airplay is this: virtue signaling is a way for leftoids to morally preen without actually having to act morally.
It’s a lot more work to be manifestly charitable toward your White neighbor than it is to profess empty charity toward a far away foreigner you will never see nor interact with except possibly at political protests against HURPHLE DRUMPH. Leftoids don’t want to do the hard work of charitable giving, they just want to emote about how charitable they are, and the best way for them to do that is by directing their phony piousness to alien hordes who are kept out of leftoid neighborhoods by restrictive zoning laws and high housing costs. The leftoid who claims the mantle of the xenophilic priesthood is careful to choose distant Others as the objects of her mouthed generosity, because if she made the mistake of speaking charitably about her countrymen and neighbors there’s a chance she’d have to put her signaling into concrete action.
Plus it’s easier to not insult those who are far away, i.e, inner city neighborhoods, when tucked away in the safety of their gated communities and suburbs. Those of us who had to deal with gaggles of beaners, niggers, and rednecks won’t be as sympathetic and will be at the ready to release the insults when the time comes.
LikeLike
Having lived for some time around all 3 groups you named there, I can say with 100% certainty that the lowest tier Whites are still better than the other two. They are not violence prone to the level of blacks and browns, and they will do things like hold the door for you when you’re walking into the post office with your hands full. Common courtesy is just that when you still have social trust.
On the other hand, a bean or a nog is so lacking in empathy that they would let that post office door slam in your face rather than hold it open for another second.
That’s it in a microcosm. I’ll take the rednecks as you call them all day over diversity of any stripe.
LikeLike
I think the answer is a lot simpler honestly.
Over and over again, leftists will support anything that is non-western, non-traditional, non-Christian, and non-white. This simple principle will predict the leftist position on any and every issue.
[CH: absolutely, (this — anti-whiteism — is what i’ve said should be the lens through which all present day politics are viewed) but what is the psychological undercurrent that encourages leftoids to hate their white race? i think it’s multifactorial, but it would help to identify the prime factor so that we realists can undermine it.]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes liberals always side with the ”’other” or with our enemies
but why ?
LikeLike
I was replying to Steven,
CH’s comment was not there when I clicked post comment.
LikeLike
Jews.
LikeLike
They’re hoping to be rewarded for their support.
LikeLike
“Jews.”
Absolutely this. The culture of the west, especially the Anglosphere, is entirely Jewish with Jewish sensibilities. Strivers like your typical oven-middle class cat-lady in-waiting always look to their betters for instruction on how to act and think. Those betters are no longer wasps (or betters).
LikeLike
Because they think “the other” is stronger and because they hope to get rewarded for their support in the future.
This is the only anthropologically sound conclusion IMO. Given the trajectory of the West over the last century, it could be that they are right.
LikeLike
“But what is the psychological undercurrent that encourages leftoids to hate their white race?”
They’re Satanic. Whatever is pure evil, they want. There, I’ve said it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yep, that really is the gist of it.
they want anything that is the opposite of divinity, morality, dignity, beauty, excellence, etc.
they are at their core ugly, dirty, rotten, and broken so they want to destroy anything that reminds them that others are capable of more
LikeLike
It is a subconscious attempt to create an alternate reality where their failures are either accepted or better, exalted for them; so that they too might get a beautiful wife or wonderful husband. Creating this dissatisfaction is partially driven by marketing and has morphed into a nefarious plan to kill us off. I think this is why fat acceptance has gone from a humane root desire to an utter perversion of it and now once rare morbidly obese people are now common. Dissatisfied people buy more crap and have more treatments to deal with their pain. That is why they lash out so viciously at people who tell the truth. They are harshing their mellow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
somebody famous once said that liberals have a higher disgust threshold than conservatives.
LikeLike
I’d say they don’t have a higher disgust threshold, but rather an upside-down one!
LikeLike
You will find no one will actually ADMIT they are EVIL. They HATE Morality. Christianity and belief in God opposes their decadent and diseased “lifestyle”.
Like the Jim Jones Suicide Cult, they are short-sighted. No one joins a Suicide Cult EXPECTING TO DIE. Useful idiots do not receive sinecures and become commissars if (((they))) win. They will not admit that to themselves, but everyone who is AWAKE to this problem knows the score in that regard.
LikeLike
CH: but what is the psychological undercurrent that encourages leftoids to hate their white race…it would help to identify the prime factor so that we realists can undermine it.”
1. Whites accept authority. They cross on green and stop on red. They follow the rules handed down from on high. Same as they don’t do individual violence nor protect themselves until the get permission to do so from a duly constituted government.
2. (((Authority))) has given them their marching orders.
3. We can’t change the psychology. We have to change who is sittiing the seat of authority.
LikeLike
Failure and the resultant social rejection causes it. Often it is self inflicted at the subconscious level. Homogeneous societies can also be stifling. I recall the day when Middle America looked askance at garlic for instance and all you could get was white bread.
LikeLike
We never ate garlic in my rural WASP household and nor did any of extended family cook with it.
Only after moving to “the city” after school did I become exposed to it and incorporate it into spaghetti sauces, etc., probably because I thought it was a cultured thing to do.
I’m off garlic now – it has no place in the Northern European palate. It’s overpowering, causes rumbling in the stomach, causes terrible breath and takes days to leave the system.
For Whites, cooking with garlic is just an affectation.
LikeLike
Garlic is used in most Northern European cuisines. It is used extensively in German and even Dutch dishes. Yours is strictly a British prejudice. Hence my point. I grew up in a family of good German cooks.
LikeLike
This is true. Classical Marxism placed the Capitalist class as the oppressor group that must be opposed. The Cultural Marxism, that is now in play, places heterosexual white men as the oppressor group that must be opposed.
LikeLike
That’s secondary – the primary advantage is as Sailer and CH posit here: they don’t have to do or sacrifice squat. Same applies for affirmative action – they can be for it without sacrificing anything but watch them turn quick when it’s their Kid who doesn’t get into Tufts, their family member who doesn’t get promoted to Admiral or General, or them who doesn’t get Tenure because of minority set asides.
They rather have socially engineered outcomes that make them feel good (but victimize others and make others pay the price – again, watch them turn when it’s them paying the price, often unexpectedly). They don’t want to even think about paying the financial price for true justice which is painstakingly making sure that those disadvantaged kids are DEVELOPED from a very young age because…..it’s too hard. They choose the socially engineered but unjust outcomes instead until it’s them paying the price for that.
LikeLike
Some of them, sure, but a lot of them just seem to be religious fanatics. Look at those scumbag Biehls; their daughter was torturously stoned to death by a gang of wild groids, who laughed at the description of her agonized groaning in the court, and those two vermin who bore her kissed up to the scum when they got out of prison and assisted them. The torturers and killers of their own daughter, FFS.
Leftists don’t care if their own flesh and blood is destroyed, or if they are, for that matter. What matters to them is Holiness. They will bleed and die happily to be numbered among the Saints.
LikeLike
So in answer to your question CH, in order to most effectively target the core psychology of leftists, we have to target each one of those 6 groups’ vulnerable “sore spot” with a specific simple strategy for each. Although 2 tactics work well as one-size-fits-all leftist kryptonite:
1. Talk about IQ science, especially race and IQ, everywhere all the time to everyone. This snaps genuinely deceived whites out of the equalist lie effectively, and cuts the legs out from under the POC’s fake status boost play.
2. Mockery, labels and insults (like Trump tweets). This cuts the legs out from under the fake status boost play. (“Hey feminists: you’re ugly second-rate men.” “Hey ladies, cat ladies are empty sad failures, mothers and grandmothers are happy and fulfilled. Choose.” “Hey POC: you suck and your nations suck and your cultures suck until you prove otherwise by changing your behavior and the results in your societies.” Etc.)
LikeLike
I’m a huwite guy who grew up in South America (parents worked there). Leftism is made up of 6 groups, with some overlap:
1. Non-huwites who want/need an artificial status boost as a group compared to huwites without earning it via achievement (“Yeah, that’s it! Huwites didn’t earn their success, they only got it by being evil and oppressing us!”)
2. Huwites who are outcasts, degenerates, and/or unsuccessful such as LGBT+ and weak/soyboy/low-T men (SJWs often high in Big 5 trait of Agreeableness, and low in verbal IQ). They need the same artificial status boost as POC.
3. Single childless huwite women whose mother instinct cannot be aimed at their own children so they aim it at what they perceive to be the most helpless people they can find: POC
4. Low-SMV women who can’t succeed in the right wing’s instinctive healthy society family structure so they turn to feminism as an alternate avenue to get sonething out of life. Same need for artificial status boost operating here too.
5. Sincerely deceived huwites ranging from unthinking normies to missionaries to idealistic young people with no life experience to high-Big5-Openness/Agreeableness academics to Vermonters with no experience of diversity. They fall for the wishful thinking that all people and groups have equal genetic ability, and/or the easy virtue-signaling aspect of leftism.
6. Elites and pragmatics who espouse leftism for their own purposes despite knowing it is total BS.
All of these groups unite in a simple mission (as another commenter pointed out): anti-white, anti-huwite, anti-huwite male, anti-tradition, anti-Christian. Why? Those things/groups are the highest status (because most successful) groups in the world. And the 6 groups above all resent or want to tear down this success for their own reasons (need for relative status boost, sincere deception and sense of righteousness in believing that successful groups are evil, or pragmatic self-interest).
It’s communism. In other words, jealousy with a fake morality of “the sacred victim” (not victims they just suck), and seeking power without earning it legitimately by adding value to your fellow man.
LikeLike
Anti-WEST
LikeLike
So in answer to your question CH, in order to most effectively target the core psychology of leftists, we have to target each one of those 6 groups’ vulnerable “sore spot” with a specific simple strategy for each. Although 2 tactics work well as one-size-fits-all leftist kryptonite:
1. Talk about IQ science, especially race and IQ, everywhere all the time to everyone. This snaps genuinely deceived whites out of the equalist lie effectively, and cuts the legs out from under the POC’s fake status boost play.
2. Mockery, labels and insults (like Trump tweets). This cuts the legs out from under the fake status boost play. (“Hey feminists: you’re ugly second-rate men.” “Hey ladies, cat ladies are empty sad failures, mothers and grandmothers are happy and fulfilled. Choose.” “Hey POC: you suck and your nations suck and your cultures suck until you prove otherwise by changing your behavior and the results in your societies.” Etc.)
LikeLike
Oh, I forgot leftist Group #7: YKW
LikeLike
I would posit that virtue signalling is a psychological need for a leftie to cover for the black hole in their soul. They don’t have actual morals, in fact the reality of their morals is quite demonic in nature. They are extremely deceptive. Anyone willing to terminate babies on mass like it’s no big deal is a corrupt individual by definition.
So they preen not because it saves them from acting morally, but because they act imorally.
LikeLiked by 3 people
this 100%
LikeLike
Its psychological, but not the altruism it seems to be. The Leftie is a freak. Amongst our kind, they are nobody. However, they have pretensions of being “elite” and better than we are. These “pet projects” are cheap and easy ego trips for them to take. They pass the costs to society and they can APPEAR to be charitable. Its SO EASY TO BE GENEROUS WITH OTHER PEOPLES’ MONEY. Like the schlub who uses the “corporate credit card” for the “three martini lunch” in the past, these Leftoids can be SO GENEROUS with Uncle Shammy’s Gubmint Cheese.
The Missionary Syndrome. Go to Shitholistan. Be the Big Bwana. Have the natives treat you like a Kang as you pass out the gibs. Its “Santa Claus” for Shitholistan. The cubicle nobody that guards the water coolers at the office. They take a Safari on the Dark Side and play Queen for a Day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. This too.
LikeLike
Virtue signaling serves this purpose and to reinforce and create the delusion in the first place.
LikeLike
Fuck the insults. That ain’t good enough. They need to be vibrantly enriched by the trash they’ve been dumping on us and then some.
LikeLiked by 2 people
*was replying to Rocko
LikeLike
did you click the reply button above rockos avatar?
LikeLike
Christianity is all about personal responsibility for sin.
Islam has everything being “the will of Allah”, and as long as you maintain loyalty to fellow Muslims and fight against the infidels, you are golden.
LikeLiked by 3 people
[…] Why Do Leftoids Virtue Signal? […]
LikeLike
Spandrell’s article on bio-leninism certainly weighs in on this. Poorly behaved out-groups are desirable since they can be counted on to be loyal to the system.
Also, Leftism generally speaking, is a universalist ideology. Correctly understood, all religions, races, cultures, etc can live under the big leftist tent in harmony.
If Islam is somehow understood to be less equal than everything else, then that could bring the entire edifice of liberalism into question and things can start to unravel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is the mechanism for creating and controlling the useful idiots. Leftism at its core is all about the welfare of the inner party. Read up on Albert Pike. We are using clinical terms for what is at its root a religious and ethnic conflict and its not just with the Muslims.
LikeLike
In other words, progressives believe that all religions, correctly understood, are true because all religions, correctly understood, are progressivism!
LikeLike
Well, whatever. The main thing is regardless of their psychological motivations their support for Muslims is genocidal racism against whites. Muslims are overwhelmingly not white and not Western and their mass presence in the West will destroy whites and the West. It’s really when you contemplate the support the left has for Islamic immigration into the West that their real nature and program comes out. They’d rather have a fascistic sharia state in France than the present liberal society there for no other reason than that liberal society is white. This is a genocidal movement. Their opening bargaining position is “we want you dead.” Thus the support not only for mass Muslim immigration, but their constant attempts to mitigate Islamic terrorism. It’s all about keeping the borders open. In the war against whitey any ally will do, even troglodyte Islamic fundamentalists and Islamic terrorists. The question is how do you deal with such totalitarian racists?
LikeLiked by 1 person
This. Leftists support the mongrel Latin American invasion of the US in the same way, even though these invaders (and many Africans) are supposedly Christians.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The question is how do you deal with such totalitarian racists?”
You kill them. Everyone has been pussyfooting around this fact for years now. You don’t fix the situation by voting or sharing Pepe memes. You hoist the black flag and start slitting throats, to quote Mencken.
LikeLike
in the age of weapons of mass destruction that would escalate pretty fast to a world of ashes. that’s partly why we’re in the stalemate we’re are in. the old ways of handling things no longer apply.
and those old ways weren’t that great, either. people forget that the novelty wears off after a few weeks.
LikeLike
in the age of weapons of mass destruction that would pretty quickly escalate to a world of ashes. that’s why we’re in the stalemate we’re in. the old ways of settling things don’t work anymore.
and the old ways weren’t that great, either. (pic of Russian revolution pile of bodies stuck in mod) people forget that the novelty of slitting throats wears off after a couple weeks when the resistance begins to fight back and you realize that you’re in the mass throat-slitting business for the long haul.
LikeLike
Plumpjack, this is the second time recently you’ve pulled out the “that’s so passe in the current year” theme. First it was “white countries are soooo passe, and never really existed in the first place.” Now it’s “physical resistance/reconquest is no longer possible in the current year, that’s so 20th century, man.”
You may be well-intentioned and believe this; or you may be a very subtle and clever agent of a certain stripe. You seem to be expending a lot of energy — in a subtle, persuasive way, mind you, with a tone of sweet reasonableness — to persuade everyone that the only available option is to lie down and take it, because “anything else is impossible in the current year.”
Now, without advocating anything one way or another, I posit that the human animal has not fundamentally changed. One survival mechanism that is common to all races and apparently all times of human history is “ethnic cleansing.” Whether it’s the good old fashioned pogrom, the Cambodians assailing Vietnamese immivaders in 1970 and driving them out by the tens of thousands, or what have you,
You haven’t really presented any evidence that this has changed, or that the invading browns — who are being whipped up into a frenzy of hatred both by their innate resentment of White superiority and by the efforts of (((propaganda))), which portrays their every failing as being a result of witchcraft — er, that is, “white privilege” — won’t try to wipe out the loathed honkies/gringos/infidels at some not too distant point.
The human animal is the same as it’s always been.
There are a bunch of Swedish skulls from 8K years ago mounted on a stake, found in a lake, with blunt trauma to them. Someone in the comments rather plaintively said, “Why hasn’t there been any evolution since then? Why haven’t people become more peaceful?”
They thereby missed the point entirely: on the scale of ethnic interaction, controlled and directed violence is ADAPTIVE, not maladaptive.
Again, I’m not advocating for anything. I would infinitely prefer a peaceful solution. But the giant alien invasion + the fury of our parasites + human nature = that is pretty damn unlikely.
Your position may well be different, given that only a fraction of it can appear per post. At the moment, however, it appears to be advocacy for abject surrender because The Gods of the Copybook Headings are allegedly obsolete in the Current Year. “Nobody can use force to achieve demographic goals anymore, it’s 2018 for soy’s sake!”
I’m not quite so sure about that conclusion — the Gods of the Copybook Headings may be “limping up to explain it once more” sooner rather than later, given current instability.
LikeLike
ironsides, my only position is that we’re going to have to be more creative than our ancestors. have you considered that there miiiiiight just be a few other options between “lie down and take it” and “let’s start slitting throats”?
I can imagine a lot of wonderful, deeply satisfying solutions to our present dilemma which i wouldn’t dare to write about here. the problem I see, however, is not whether they would be effective (they would be), but rather how do we to get a point where we’re controlling the narrative and can actually implement them?
to repeat, we’re trying to shift society from the left’s narrative of “everybody’s equal” to the altR’s narrative of “natural heirarchy” (which would theoretically justify almost any means necessary).
l don’t see how “slitting throats” is going help us accomplish that, but maybe that’s just me. maybe you should give it a try and let us know how that works.
LikeLike
on a more practical level, talking graphically about inflicting harm on the opposition on your favorite blog is a great way to help build a case for getting it shut down.
in the excellent words of Jay in DC (which you clearly went over your head), “subterfuge is a word which you can’t even spell let alone understand and it is critically important”
LikeLike
…and if it was actually time to physically fight back and start “slitting throats” we wouldn’t still be anonymously blowing hot air on comments boards, now would we?
LikeLike
Well, I guess what I’m saying went right over YOUR head as well. You make statements like “white countries can’t exist anymore and never existed anyway,” and “resistance is impossible because, like, nukes, dude.”
You will note that I never said we should start slitting throats; I never even mentioned that phrase, in case you didn’t notice. Nor did I indicate whose throats would be slit. At the moment, browns ethnically cleansing US appears a lot more likely than the reverse.
You’ve offered nothing.
You say “be subtle!” and then laugh at the rubes for not seeing your marvelous insight, which consists of … saying “be subtle” in order to appear clever and clearly having no actual plan at all.
At this point, I don’t think violence would accomplish anything.
Nor do I think that “subterfuge” would accomplish anything.
There is NO FIXING the situation as it stands. The outcome is baked in the cake at this point, it’s just that we can’t yet see which fork destiny is going to take. In my opinion, there is NO plan, pacific or violent, which will suffice to reverse That Which Is Going to Happen.
In order to use “subterfuge,” we would need a long period of time, at least 2 to 3 generations — which we don’t have — and huge amounts of money — which we don’t have. Violence is even more futile at this point.
One of two things is going to occur:
1. The dirt world invasion rolls over us and we’re gone, either through demographic swamping or out and out purging.
2. The invasion continues until it partly overloads the system and causes it to break down at some point. At this point, conflict occurs which results in either Balkanization or the eviction of one group or another, in one way or another, like Yugoslavia on a grand scale.
So either the Third World wins outright, or things degenerate into a measure of chaos and someone uses force in some way to resolve the situation. Not necessarily to our benefit.
Neither subtlety nor force avail at the moment. It’s too late for one and too soon for the other. At the moment, all we can do is “red pill” people so that if/when it all goes to hell, there may be enough who know the score to organize something capable of continuing the race and its culture.
LikeLike
Ironsides, I’ve stated my theory about what’s happening plenty of times but I’ll state it again: the only war we need to be fighting is the information war.
you seem to think that doom is “baked in the cake”. I actually think the opposite: the crystalization of a new information paradigm is a slowly-ticking time bomb that’s going to be the end of the civilization wreckers’ reign of absurdity. their entire game plan depended on keeping the goyim in the dark about their schemings. without that ability they’re pretty much fucked, unless they come up with some AI thing, which could actually happen.
there’s a reason all this is coming together for our side (and coming apart for the left) all at the same time and that is because information is now freely available to the masses. we don’t need to be doing ANYTHING other than be fighting the information war and try to speed the unraveling of their narrative. we certainly don’t need to cede the moral high ground by resorting to violence. not when everything is already going in our favor.
and, nukes ARE a problem. that is another reason why it’s in our interest to keep it about the narrative. the entire white race could be wiped out in less than thirty minutes. then what would have been the point of your writing all these pearl-clutching comments? a total waste.
LikeLike
Well, I hope you’re right. That would be a quite happy outcome.
It’s been fun poking each other in the eye, sir, but at the moment I need to go make shekels. Mayhaps we’ll have the opportunity for some more eye-poking at another time, too, eh? 😉
P.S. Got some damn fine pearls here to clutch, too. Also keeps me busy.
LikeLike
likewise, ironsides. always a pleasure. gotta go make some shekels myself.
LikeLike
Part of the solution is to produce white offspring.
The power of the left to indoctrinate the young has been wounded, maybe even mortally so. Our children, even our girls, are much more likely to resist Poz than our own was.
Plus when the Boomers die off the demographics will be heavily skewed towards the invaders and Paper Americans. They will then bare their fangs in a blatant way. Hell, they are doing it now even.
The 14 year old white American boy doesn’t have a middle-management job that he can prioritize over all other concerns. He has no mortgage, no shrieking wife, and little to no attachment to the mythology of old. They don’t fall prey to “What about the holocaust” in any amount similar to their predecessors.
The Jews played the long game. We can too. White births need to be encouraged. We need to be praising women who give birth to
White children. It will awaken their vanity and have a snowball effect.
LikeLike
I expect in your lifetime we will see head shavings and genocide again. The French can be serious, serious dicks when they put their minds to it. In twenty years they won’t be in a trifling mood anymore.
LikeLike
The war people are talking about involves kicking in doors, giving innocent, shrieking families 30 minutes to pack their most important possessions and to get on the truck. Then you either torch or requisition their houses and loot their possessions or give them to the resettled. It will involve shooting uppity women and children to maintain discipline. It will involve shooting the men and boys to eliminate them as a future threat. Then there is retaliation. What if nogs do this to your family and have a BBQ with you watching? This will get savage beyond belief. Let’s not tempt fate when all of these initiatives backfire. This recent school shooting will backfire the same as Las Vegas on a whole slew of too difficult to answer questions. These crisis actors everywhere and smiling, carefree children being brave for the camera in the face of such trauma is no longer selling.
LikeLike
I remember when leftists would hate all religions equally, 20 years ago being on the left was regarded as being pro atheist, pro secularism. Now the left is always praising Islam, always praising Saudi Arabia and has no bad words to say at all about the religion, only praise. It is weird how in love with a religion they have become over the past decade especially, maybe one day they may recognise the benefits that Christianity brings to our society, one can wish.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is the plan.
LikeLike
The oil ticks are FUNDING all of their pet project.
Dontcha know ?
Both sides think they’re in the driver’s seat.
LikeLike
They do not expect Islam to “WIN”. You will find they expect that Islam will be co-opted like Christians were by porn and corn. Decadence is what they expect will “Rule the World”.
Tolerance is a downward spiral of decadence and decay. No one rides that plane and actually “Lives Well”. Its not about “Living Well” to these fanatics on the Left. Like dose vibrants in The Stone Age, its a magical fantasy of living Rich without WORKING.
Magic meteors, Harry Potter, and Gubmint Cheese.
LikeLike
FEAR
Virtue signaling is an instinctive, pre-emptive foisting of the white flag to prevent attack from the crystalline spread of globalizing, homogenizing, corporatism.
LikeLike
CH is right – the lefties I know don’t meaningfully do anything for charity, especially give any effort or time. They post and march. I also think there is real fear here – if they sidle up to Mohammed maybe he won’t kill them…
LikeLike
OH YEAH. As Jordan Peterson notes:
He went on to say the way to really change the world is not protests but helping people, creating helpful inventions, doing good, etc.
LikeLike
Don’t let your left hand know what your right hand is doing. – JC
LikeLike
how many leftoids work for non-profits and do charity work, while neglecting their own families?
“my mom’s in a nursing home and I haven’t visited her in three months because I’m too busy working for such-and-such virtuous organization that brings fresh drinking water to African women.”
it’s the darnedest thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
i’ve seen a lot of this
the people who are relentless in maintaining a do gooder image always seem to treat their families and friends the worst. they also seem to have a lot of failed family and romantic relationships in their history. easy to see why.
i’ve known a shitload of people with family members who spend a lot of time volunteering in animal and homeless shelters or working in medicine and social services.
people that don’t know them well, think they are saints. but the ones closest to them know what bs that is.
most of them have disastrous personal lives because they are at their core selfish self involved people who care more about maintaining their saint/martyr image than actually being kind and generous to other people.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Also this:
http://www.rense.com/general96/Operation_Mind_Control.pdf
LikeLike
– Meet “Fellow White Person”: A Twitter Account That Exposes Jews Who Pose as White People –
https://squawker.org/culture-wars/meet-fellow-white-person-a-twitter-account-that-exposes-jews-who-pose-as-white-people/
LikeLike
How Arabs treat whites when Arabs are in power: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/01/10/why-every-warrior-should-own-a-firearm/
LikeLike
http://www.armenian-genocide.org/genocide.html
LikeLike
Without 2A you wouldn’t have any rights at all. It would have been game over 40 years ago.
LikeLike
“The right to own weapons is the right to be free”.
LikeLike
Leftists are just slaves to the consensus.
They NEED a consensus to feel safe. The reigning consensus of the day is illogical, but conformity for the sake of social safety has nothing to do with logic, its not a means to an end, the conformity is the end in itself.
This is even a reasonable biological adaptation. Logic doesn’t matter when you have to fear being outcast and deserted. So leftists get a dopamine hit from saying stuff like “trannies r brave!”, because the weak need tribal approval in order to survive and replicate.
The self-sufficient will always be the only people psychologically capable truth-seeking. And that is why it is so rare.
LikeLike
They want to court favor and be given their achievements for being a good boy. (That’s how it seems to work in commie countries.)
LikeLike
Yes. The primary customer groups of leftism are all weak in one way or another. They NEED approval, or what I call “artificial status boost”, because they do not achieve.
LikeLike
Because they think it actually means something. (Other than they’re just cowards and selfish, of course… )
LikeLike
Leftists think virtue signaling actually means something. (Other than that they’re cowards and selfish, of course… )
LikeLike
leftists think virtue signaling = action
in reality it’s just faggot mental masturbation
LikeLike
Liberals are different , that is for sure, I would not be surprised at all if it turned out they have different DNA.
there was a study done a couple years ago, it revealed that liberals are less repulsed by repulsive things than conservatives are.
another survey revealed that liberals are more likely to unfriend someone because of their politics / opinions
those seem like small unimportant things but they add up; liberals are different
If I had a better working memory I would remember a few other things that clearly indicate there are ” deep” differences between leftoids and non-leftoids.
I think the minds of liberals are as different from the minds of non-liberals as women are different from men, homosexuals are different from straight people, and narcissists are different from their co-dependent victims.
and as I have been saying for I don’t know ? 15 years ? liberals have something feminine in how their mind work, while conservative have something more manly in how their brain process things
I just don’t know why about half of humans have ”liberal DNA” and the other half has ”conservative DNA”
maybe it will one day be explained by evolution psychology ? maybe ”nature” wants it this way for some reason?
maybe it serves some purpose?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Leftoid that is the in the post title
Leftoids not liberals
Do you understand that simple concept?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ok so explain to us the difference between liberal and leftoid – as things are right now in 2018 – oh you great genius.
Do you understand this simple question ?
LikeLike
still waiting for you to tell us the difference between liberal and leftoid as things are in 2018
LikeLike
I have seen at least one study (maybe it was shared here?) where it was demonstrated that left / right orientation could be pretty reliably discerned just by examining someone’s face. That was long before any of the soyboi talk began, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was here: physiognomy.
LikeLike
Jonathan Haidt on the moral roots of liberals and conservatives:
LikeLiked by 1 person
They don’t do studies on leftoids as it is not officially a word, google does not even know what that word is, only the urban dictionary can tell us something about it
but plenty of studies and surveys are done on liberals
here is another difference between liberals and normal people
liberals give less to charity than normal people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and if they do give to charities it’s usually for things like animal welfare, gay rights, and planned parenthood.
they love animals and degenerates but hate babies and humans in general.
LikeLike
google does not what a leftoid is
jeez how is that possible
I can’t even
LikeLike
In a nutshell, they think as women and prefer to manipulate the perception of reality than deal head on with a problem. Women have a higher threshold of disgust than do men as well.
LikeLike
https://www.anonymousconservative.com/
LikeLike
Look up Curt Doolittle (Propertarianism). He explains all this in a concise scientific way. One of his recent FB posts explained it brilliantly.
LikeLike
I’ve been pondering people’s motivation for “virtue signaling”, and I think it can be thought of as a vehicle for Whiteness signaling. In atomized western countries where prole white communities are the first to become miscegenated with the turd world hordes (both genetically and geographically), it’s a strategy for projecting to society at large that you deserve to remain integrated in GoodWhite culture rather than being tossed to the Orcs. Which is why you see it in low SMV people who would otherwise be shut out of the post-monogamy White mating market.
LikeLike
My guess on why the feminist left is defensive of all things Muslim is they hate conventionally pretty women. They like the idea of forcing women to cover in hijabs and burkas because they want an even playing field..where on the surface all women are equally ugly.
LikeLike
yes there is probably a bit of that…
and a lot of women also secretly wish for men to be strong and dominant, which muslims are to an extent by treating women like cattle… women like to be controlled, dominated, they say they don’t but they do.
if about 200,000,000 women read and LOVED the book 50 shades of Grey which is about a woman being told what to wear, what to eat, where she can go and when , and with whom by a strong dominant man it is because women wish , desire to be dominated and controlled by a man.
Islam offers some of that…a cheap ugly version of it, yes, but it is better than a feminist beta man who is so soft he makes her feel like she is the man.
LikeLike
They like them some boy pussy too.
LikeLike
Leftists know they aren’t good people, so they look to others higher up in the hierarchy to see what “good people” should think. Their virtue signaling is how they demonstrate loyalty. Anybody can see self-evident truth, it is the mark of loyalists to go along with untruths. Both leftists and Islamists are satanists; leftism is the cerebral rebellion against God and Islam is the physical rebellion against God.
LikeLike
This is the ultimate root cause.
LikeLike
White Leftoids dont have any kind of strong identity or attachment beyond their stuff. What they do have is status. So they build an identity around their status. Anything that threatens that status threatens their identity. That’s why they have to signal so hard against working class whites..working class whites are low status. Shitlibs can be mistaken for working class whites, Therefore to ensure they are not mistaken for working class whites, they must signal very hard against them. This protects their status and thus their identity.
Its okay to indulge in recreational christianity, but serious faith is declasse..thus Christianity is countersignalled. But Islam is the faith of brown people. Defending it demonstrates you have tolerance and are thus high status. Thus shitting on Christianity and fellating mohametans becomes affirming to their identity.
LikeLike
Yes, virtue-signaling and status-signaling are closely related.
LikeLike
Yes. Leftism is about status. Fake status not based on achievement, truth, beauty, or intrinsic worth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What’s funny about the Muslims is that they have utter contempt for secular Westerners but are very deferential toward unapologetic Christians. Key word, unapologetic.
Maybe that will be our ultimate salvation.
LikeLike
Muslims respect strength. (Why they despised Obama for kissing their ass.)
LikeLike
I get why mudsharks posts pics of their offspring on dating sites (to show the brothas they’re a mudshark), but what’s the psychology behind so many women on dating sites posting pictures with their dog(s)?
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
The tide is slowly turning –
http://jishirofinney.com/index.php/2018/02/17/533/
LikeLike
it’s not “leapfrogging” loyalty.
it’s that the Leftists are Marxists. their loyalty is to the Proletariat.
and shitskin turdworlders are far more Proletarian than anyone from a 1st world economy can ever pretend to be.
LikeLike
Can we use the correct terminology? The term is ‘leftard.’ The concept of retardation should be a component of their name bc leftists invariably have had an arrest or a retardation of their emotional and moral development.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Leftists are ugly people (mostly from white race) that resent people who are beautiful.
But who can, in all honesty, argue that the most beautiful people are not the tall, the white, and the blonde?
Because they (quietly) regard the brown people as ugly, they see them as allies not in a struggle against oppression but a fight against the beautiful.
LikeLike
More on this.
Now the fact that a lot of Arab and Persian women are gorgeous has not gone unnoticed by the leftoid.
But those cultures require the beekeeper outfit.
You have no idea how comforting it is to an ugly woman when hot women are required to cover their faces.
LikeLike
Yes. Status wars.
LikeLike
Guilt. Inculcated from birth as having superior life circumstances, they feel guilty over their privilege and comfort and wear virtue-signal sackcloth as penance.
Guilt is only a small part of it, and I agree with all above comments.
When you are told from childhood (don’t kid yourselves that public skools are the only purveyors) that you have SO MUCH you didn’t build or earn, and ought to share no matter what…it gets to ya. Like the scene in Atlas Shrugged where a mother insists her child give away her best toy to one less fortunate. The kid doesn’t understand, only sees her stuff being given away, but the lesson is brutally beaten into her psyche: the poor are more authentic and worthy than I am.
Noble Savagery, and the further away the Savage, the more Noble he is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. Guilt can lead to leftist tendencies for sincerely decieved whites.
LikeLike
http://www.unz.com/isteve/israeli-anti-illegal-infiltration-activists-invite-africans-to-crash-at-mansion-of-sarah-silvermans-leftist-sisters/
LikeLike