Grab a kleenex feminists, because there are only two sexes and your idiotic deconstructivist ideals are laughable!
A machine learning algorithm was able to correctly predict with 80% accuracy the sex of study subjects from brain images. Highlights:
- Neuroanatomical sex differences in youth is modeled using a statistical learning approach.
- Results indicate the advantageous of multivariate analysis over univariate analysis.
- Cortical thickness and mean curvature measures revealed sex differences that were unrelated to brain size.
- Most discriminative brain areas were angular and occipital gyri and paracentral lobule.
- The source code for the analysis performed in this study has been made available.
The algorithm was not able to distinguish more than two sexes, male and female. Sorry, freaks, you don’t have a poo poo platter of genders to choose from. You’re either man, woman, or mentally ill.
Sex differences are literally brain-deep and therefore invalidate feminist theory that the sexes are born the same but diverge in ability and preference due to “social conditioning”. Men and women have different brain architectures, notable in specific regions of the brain, and these differences are independent of brain size.
Interestingly, male and female brains show the most pronounced difference in the occipital lobes and the angular gyri. The occipital lobes process visual information (holistically appealing jerkboy vs visually stimulating HB). The angular gyri are involved in calculation (math) and in mental representation of spatial information (engineering).
Mm mm mmm mm mm. ¡SCIENCE! won’t take my salty balls out of its mouth.
PS If this machine learning research were directed to predict the race of subjects from their brain images, I suspect the results would be….AWFULLY revealing.
PPS Right on cue, scientists have discovered that DNA tests can predict a person’s IQ. Uh oh! Narrative collapse incoming!
What part of the brain processes obesity and purple hair?
LikeLiked by 2 people
In women: the felinus lobe
In men: the GTFO lobes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
the racial discrimination would probably be even higher. Wonder if they will do that study next.
There is so much science in support of the nature/biology position out there, but literally NOBODY knows about it. Hiding in plain sight.
LikeLike
“You’re either man, woman, or mentally ill”
That needs to start appearing on flyers all over American college campuses…
Also, a catchy bumper sticker.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sorry Pat, can’t date you until that brain scan is done.
LikeLike
Droll.
LikeLike
“You’re either man, woman, or mentally ill”
Bumper stickers can’t do wordiness.
Even just “man, woman, or mentally ill” would be a tough fit – to be readable, it would span moast of the bumper.
[CH: “you’re man, woman, or mentally ill” would be in line with the length of most bumper stickers. Have you seen the verbose crap shitlibs plaster on their priuses?]
LikeLiked by 1 person
T-Shirts have similar problems.
You really have to cut way, way down on the verbiage for those media.
LikeLike
Pictures say a 1000 words!
LikeLike
Maybe just the symbol for man, the symbol for woman, and a cartoon of an insane “person”.
LikeLike
“This has already been made:
https://pewtube.com/user/ConnorMcIntyre/am90tPR
LikeLike
Something similar, but much more concise obviously.
LikeLike
In other news… Water is wet. Unless you ask a feminist.
LikeLike
Well it least they’re right when they say water can be fluid….
LikeLike
[…] Machine Learning Correctly Predicts Sex From Brain Imaging, Feminists BTFO…Again! […]
LikeLike
Porn Stars are now “Me Too-ing”
https://jezebel.com/porn-actors-leigh-raven-and-riley-nixon-allege-abuse-v-1823677195
LikeLike
Read the details. Buck nigger.
The Jew did this.
LikeLike
Whore moan therapy.
LikeLiked by 4 people
OK, I’m going to have to try to remember that one!
LikeLike
ZERO sympathy. Burn the coal, pay the toll. Even if it is pr0n.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Men and women would have similar brains if patriarchal forces didn’t afflict girls in utero.
LikeLike
Lol. I imagine that would be their argument, but that will make them look absolutely desperate, which I’m guessing they are nowadays.
LikeLike
No, no, it’s all a blank slate, if you ask Hillary:
“[Democrats] do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton explained. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”
(Ntknetwork. com)
[CH: thecunt is such a cunt. she can’t fathom that married white women might vote against her scabby decrepit ass because her attitude and policies are bad for their husbands and children.
every day i give thanks to the one true god that trump is his herald and hillary is home drowning in chardonnay.]
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not drowning fast enough though CH.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and men in INDIA listened to this shit and didn’t slap her in her fucking ugly face?
Someone should have said bitch letting your woman make decisions is a recipe for fucking disaster, just look at you!
LikeLike
Posted on r/politics and was removed because source isn’t on their approved sources list. Lolzol.
LikeLike
Was that with lights on or off ?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Earlier today, I was reflecting on all the evenings and mid-afternoons I’ve passed in cafes around the cuntry and world, ostensibly to read a book and enjoy a coffee, but in reality to try to identify, move in on, and slay a girl. I was doing something, I knew that I was doing it, and I knew why I wanted to do it. Cold approaches, like any kind of cold call, have low success rates and, as they say, batting .300 will get you in the hall of fame.
Take the girls in the cafe – please. Many will be there with a friend(s), and some will be alone. The ones alone, do they know why they’re there? Any person can stay home to read a book or write a paper and avoid incurring a $5 expense for coffee. Why are they there? To similarly meet, or attract rather, members of the opposite sex? Perhaps, but most aren’t even aware that that is the reason, let alone admit it to themselves.
Take a Saturday night out at a pub, bar, or da club. There should be no plausible deniability there about why men and women go out to these places. And yet womyn continually lie (to themselves and others) about why they go. They’ll say it’s to go “dancing” (as if), to blow off steam from the week or let their hair down (guys who talk about letting their hair down need to get punched in the throat, so gay is that expression when uttered by men), or some other make-believe non-reason. They go, primarily, to present themselves before male suitors and express their sexuality. For validation, perhaps. Why else would they spend so much time ironing their hair, applying makeup, and wearing skirts that are far to short? Men go out to find poosy and smash. We all know it, if we don’t all admit it. I admit. Some of those men and women will end up banging at the end of the night. For the men, it will be the result of sustained, assiduous, and calibrated efforts to convince the woman to bang. For the girlz, it, of course it “just happened.” There are of coursh a minorahty of situations where girlz go out with the full and cognizant intention to get their fück on, but again minority of womyn in a minority of situations. The machority, nay all men, go with a plan.
In short, men do things and know that they’re doing them and more often than not, why. Womyn have no clue what they’re doing at the best of times and certainly couldn’t tell you why.
TL;dr: due to their brain capacity, women have no agency. Repeal the 19th and start fining spinsters and imposing huge duties on cat food to pay for the wall.
LikeLike
+1.
It’s all so simple. Time I admit why I go out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s all right and encomiably so — I have come to realize the same not without dismay, I mean if it’s not a horror scene to see these complexes of a vagina 4 limbs 2 breasts 2 falsely smiling lips and a lump or parallel running selves lying to each other I don’t know what it is.
(Certainly, it’s not what culture defines as “person” and tells us females are).
But the jump from “no self-awareness” and “no self” (because they have no internal selves-unifying, consistency making narrator) and “agency” is unwarranted.
One can be self-aware and still have no agency, it’s 2 separate concepts.
LikeLike
What we know and what we’ll admit to knowing are often two very different things. Don’t mistake manipulating ourselves into a position of decreased accountability for a lack of self awareness.
LikeLike
Thing is, if you’re mentally ill, you’re also either a man or a woman.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Touche`
LikeLike
True, but for the rhetoric it is the way to go.
LikeLike
Heh, heh… do a google on “the brains of men and women” and the first three entries contradict themselves, go figger. 😉
LikeLike
Quick, someone start a DNA company called IQandMe.
Better: IQyourEx
Gunslinger would have a field day…
LikeLike
PPS Right on cue, scientists have discovered that DNA tests can predict a person’s IQ. Uh oh! Narrative collapse incoming!”””
yea little scary the designer baby thing going on
LikeLike
yea shit I haven’t come up with an invention in a bit
just the shit I came up with from the shows
like for instance the way basically all companies do training is shit and puts them in severe liability
some ceo almost walked into a fucking jet engine lolzolzolozlzz till the lady training him said wow don’t go there rofl
some other ceo talked about his dad got crushed in a fucking washer and then his company still has the dumbest way to put clothes in a fucking giant washer by hand you could possibly imagine and he got his arm almost pulled into it
I mean fucking item after item of people just being dumb as fuck
then the imposible times they give the white dudes is pure discrimination and shit but they supposed to kiss the employees ass instead of saying ok that is the standard let me see you do it.
the manufacturing assembly lines are literally retarded in almost all companies like straight morons made the shit at certain points like ok we gonna do this right and then we just overlook a whole section
the sheer fucking volume of changed that could be made is unreal
I need a bitch to just sit there and take notes and write letters to companies all fucking day
I am feeling like my mission in life is probably to visit every company on earth and within a day or so come up with at least millions in cost savings
LikeLike
for the airlines need a dam dummy plane so training doesn’t impact real life flight times and no chance of someone becoming compost
LikeLike
The fact that our society wastes time and brainpower to prove things scientifically that everyone already knows is one of the greatest historical head scratchers. We have some of the greatest tools and inventions ever devised, and we use it on this trivial shit. Maddening…
Soapbox rant over.
I can confirm that the brains of boys and girls are different from the very beginning. Hell, I’d even say that they have a different effect on their MOTHER in utero. I have multiples of both sexes, and there were VERY distinct differences in my wife’s moods when she was carrying my sons versus when she was carrying my daughters. When she was pregnant with my sons, she was laid back, calm, took things in stride; when she was pregnant with my daughters, she was a lot more moody, irritable, almost like she had more estrogen or something flowing through her (duh).
And when my kids were born, they acted differently, they like different stuff, they have different interests. My boys like cars/trucks/balls/guns, my daughters like ponies/dresses/dancing/dolls. I’ve got enough cheap ass Chinese toys from their grandparents that they can pick and play with either one, and they always gravitate toward traditional gender toys, without influence from me or my wife.
I’ll say it again: BOYS AND GIRLS ARE HARDWIRED DIFFERENTLY FROM THE BEGINNING. And if I made my son play with a doll, he’d probably have it go to war with the other dolls. And if I made my daughter play with trucks, she’d pick the “prettiest” one to play with.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And if I made my daughter play with trucks, she’d pick the “prettiest” one to play with.
In this regard, I’ve noticed that most girls, when watching some types of sporting event, will always root for the team with the “prettiest” colors.
LikeLike
When my son played with his toy trucks, there were violent truck wars. When his little sister played with the same toys, the mommy truck took care of the baby trucks. She saw how big brother played, but that’s not how she wanted to play.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
I bought “the Female Eunuch”, because I thought I should probably inform myself if I was going to have opinions in this area. I got as far as the bit where Greer claims – without definitively making a claim – that women are shaped like women because historically they have been made to wear corsets.
Didn’t bother with the rest of it.
LikeLike
what now you can really know if you accidentally with a tranny lol
LikeLike
pretty cool so I guess the question is what are the 20 percent
things that should maybe be thrown in the pile
or is that the people harnessed to get all the work done
LikeLike
I hit what appears to be a pay wall on the Telegraph site. How accurately can they predict IQ from DNA?
LikeLike
[…] are undoubtedly seeking a way to turn off the oppressively patriarchal occipital lobe, because it’s just logical that such a reactionary, archaic tool would be the source of all […]
LikeLike
ROC analysis, in the Chateau halls, oh my!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A couple of issues with your inferences:
1) The machine learning algorithm used was a support vector machine which has to be “trained”. That means that the scientist inputs real brain scan data and then indicates the sex of the person. The algorithm then learns to recognize sex based on the patterns that it observed. In all likelihood, the algorithm was only trained on male and female. If it was given a few examples of “genderfluid freak”, perhaps it would be able to recognize that too. We don’t know. So your inference that there are only two sex isn’t really very well supported by this particular data.
2) Showing that brain structure is predictably different among males and females doesn’t necessarily mean they were born that way. Environmental factors can and do change neurology over time.
Point number 1 could be established using an unsupervised learning algorithm such as a cluster analysis. And 2 could be established by using brain images of infants.
[CH: not necessarily, intrinsic sex-based brain differences might take years to fully develop. puberty, for instance, is marked by increasing brain architecture divergence b/t boys and girls.]
I think you’re ultimately correct that there are intrinsic neurological differences between males and females, even though this particular study doesn’t prove it. The other point I’m not so sure about. Chemicals in the water are making the friggin’ frogs gay, after all. Gender confused people may actually have altered neurology.
LikeLike