• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« March For Their Limelight: The Little Narcisshits
“we need diversity” & misc. »

The Art And Science Of Compliance Tests: “Yes, but…” Edition

March 26, 2018 by CH

Henry Mueller (this guy again!) discusses an important Game concept, relating to the post about a girl sending a text pic of her newly painted goth nails as a ruse to fish for a compliment from a man.

“Red would’ve gotten my attention better.”

Even if you like the black.

There’s a subtle art to teasing a woman’s ego while still dangling the carrot to keep her interested.

If you say it looks nice, that’s alright. Not a fatal error but not terribly interesting. If you say “that looks like sh!t”, you run the risk of sabotaging it.

I say things like this in a “yes, but…” way so there’s always an implied compliment within a criticism, and vice versa:

“You look good now as a blonde but I prefer brunette.”

“The black nails look nice but __ would be better.”

I dated a beautiful Southern girl for 3 years who was obsessed with girly things like taking thousands of pictures of her nails and hair, and I used this kind of thing effectively on her whenever she was fishing for compliments.

It sets a win-win frame: I’m attracted to you, but there’s still a lot of room for improvement. Done in the right way, women will happily fall into this like a hypnotic subject.

She’s asking you for an opinion on her beauty. You can act indifferent, but why not use it to your advantage? Even if I have no opinion, I always give girls specific instructions and frame it like it’s self-evident that it’s all being done to please me.

A woman who will dye her hair or change her nail color at your whim just to please you is a woman who will do damn near anything to please you.

Related, from the world of highbrow literature: In Story of O, O had her labia pierced with a heavy dangling chain for her man, and gave herself over to another man on her own man’s insistence. Lesson: Women will only love you with wanton obsession if they are working to earn your approval. So keep them on their painted toes.

Fashion photographers and sleazy professors know this “yes, but…” compliance test trick and exploit it to great personal benefit. “This shot of you is great, but if you did this or moved there or smiled like so, the photo would be much better.” “You have a lot of creative ideas, but if you edited your thoughts you would persuade me better.”

In PUA lingo, this Cockiavellian tactic is called Compliance Tests. Similar and related concepts are Hoop Theory and Qualification. All have the goal of altering the usual courtship dynamic to one in which the woman is seeking the man’s approval. Old timers would call it “chasing the carrot”. The idea behind it is that women who do something for you, by being subtly encouraged to self-improvements to please you, are psychologically groomed to think that you are higher value and therefore worth pursuing as a lover.

There’s nothing wrong with trying to please a woman….if you already know she wants you and the act of pleasing her will validate her feelings for you. Men who are over-qualified to women will want to make a few sincere efforts at complimenting and pleasing them, so as to increase their attainability. (Surprisingly often for very HSMV men, women will bow out of a conversation early on with them to save their egos the frustration of potentially getting pumped and dumped or overlooked for a hotter friend.)

But trying to please women in the conventional sense is self-defeating when the dynamic is uncertain and unstable, and your efforts liable to be perceived as the try-hard supplication of a lower value beta male. Before she has fully opened for you (in every way), you want to keep her guessing, chasing, and pleasing you, so that she goes to bed at night eagerly awaiting your next date and all the ways she can impress you, instead of bemoaning the dullness of humoring another cut-out average joe who tells her nice predictable things and vouchsafes his submission to her whims.

“Yes, but…” is a devious sales technique that works as well in seduction — the arena in which you are selling yourself to women — as it does on the car dealership floor. As you persuade your woman to do things for you, over time you increase the frequency and intensity of your demands until wake-up BJs are given without waiting to be asked, just as a message to you that she is always ready to take her next order.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Game, Girls | 112 Comments

112 Responses

  1. on March 26, 2018 at 2:20 pm theasdgamer

    CH, I liked this post, especially the “cockiavellian” wordsmithing. Also the reference to old time “chasing the carrot. Keep up the good work.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 26, 2018 at 3:55 pm da GBFM zlzoolzlzzlzozlzloozozo

      your gina is tight
      but that is only because
      my cockasz massive

      compliance haiku lzozozozo

      LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 4:20 pm Captain Obvious

        “Yes, but…”

        IRL, this kinda sh!znat is called Passive-Aggressive Personality Disorder.

        If a chick ever starts this on you, then RUN FORREST RUN!!!!!

        LikeLiked by 1 person


  2. on March 26, 2018 at 2:27 pm XDEEPR...: xdeepr.wordpress.com

    The opposite of Elon Musk:

    I liked two things in particular: The way he uses dead silence and a couple of eye movements plus smiles to communicate (I’ll do this), and also the way he’s not afraid to be totally direct and blunt: “Substitute for a small penis . . .double bluff. It’s huge.”

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 27, 2018 at 10:01 am oink

      less believable than pr0n

      LikeLike


  3. on March 26, 2018 at 2:33 pm Jim

    It’s funny timing for me that you mentioned the photograph thing in the midst of this post.

    Talking to a girl this weekend and she sent me a nude pic. I replied, “I can see why your internet fanboys love you so much,” then didn’t respond for awhile cause I was busy. When I checked my phone, I had six different messages from her about “I can’t tell if you want to sleep with me or not. It’s obvious that I want you though. We totally should because don’t you think it would be amazing?”

    Fast forward to last night, she sends me another out of the blue, and I responded “Nice, but next time spread your legs more so I get a better view.”

    New pic arrived less than a minute later, legs spread wide.

    I think the best thing this blog has given me, even though the advice is classic, is the mindset shift that has me saying stuff like this without even thinking about it. Inner game, right?

    LikeLiked by 7 people


    • on March 26, 2018 at 2:34 pm XDEEPR...: xdeepr.wordpress.com

      Nice.

      LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 2:47 pm mendo

      E x c e l l e n t

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 26, 2018 at 3:35 pm Greg Eliot

      So… what’s the over/under on the wide angle twat shot? 50 guys?

      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 26, 2018 at 4:00 pm mendo

        If she’s over, then I’m under

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 7:23 pm Greg Eliot

        Career advice: get yourself under a good woman and work your way up.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 26, 2018 at 4:01 pm Declane

      Every girl who has an instagram account is a whore. Yes, even the tweens.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on March 26, 2018 at 5:49 pm JironGhrad

        Actually, I’d disagree somewhat. Girls, who only post pictures that they’ve taken of things other than themselves (no selfies, few if any pictures taken of them by other), are unusual and tend away from whorishness, generally.

        LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 4:03 pm FastEddie

      Yep- “mindset shift.” It’s CEO frame. Works well in business too. Just had an employee email me this morning because he hit a new sales goal. Immediately responded how proud I was, and that I fully expect him to hit the next tier next month.

      Couple this private challenge with public praise, and you have dynamite.

      Glad you’re all my brothers.
      FE

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 26, 2018 at 4:46 pm XDEEPR...: xdeepr.wordpress.com

        *dryly* I admire FastEddie’s Dilbert School of Management-ism, but that shit only works on women indefinitely.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 4:57 pm XDEEPR ...: xdeepr.wordpress.com

        Maybe I should be more explicit.

        I, too, plan on being in business and managing people (well, white men; there shan’t be any others where I am!)

        The problem with what you’re advocating is that it’s deceptive, short-term, and fraught with ethical problems.

        I’m a hardcore capitalist, okay? But you don’t get value by failing to give value. It is the LIBERALS who think the marketplace is a zero-sum, ripoff game, who came up with the RETARDED “just price” idea in history, back when Christianity had a beating heart . . . on and on. But you’re not giving value when you jerk someone’s chain like that. All you’re doing is ensuring you’ll have at least one embittered employee, and a roomful of his associates who heard his story and who are thus planning to invite in a union the first chance they get.

        No offense. I like profitseeking, massively, and the massiver the profit, the more I like it. Only, try and earn it on the backs of your competitors, not the heartblood of your firm. X sermon over. *FLASH GONE*

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 5:15 pm FastEddie

        Sounds even more beautiful than diversitopia. Go start a company and test it. Report back when you break even. No reason to post until then.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 5:47 pm XDEEPR ...: xdeepr.wordpress.com

        *grinning broadly*

        I still say my way will be better than yours currently is.

        Check me out again when my company is a billion-dollar concern, and yours’s still struggling to break even for more than three consecutive quarters.

        *POOF!*

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 7:22 pm Greg Eliot

        Just had an employee email me this morning because he hit a new sales goal. Immediately responded how proud I was, and that I fully expect him to hit the next tier next month.

        Now I know why they call you Fast Eddie.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 7:56 pm FastEddie

        hahahaha
        Every damn time, GE.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 7:58 pm Greg Eliot

        You like to gamble, Eddie? You like to bet money on a game of pool?

        /I’ll stop doing it when you stop laughing. 😉

        LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 6:43 pm plumpjack

      if a girl sends a nude why not send a nude back… of a hotter chick, shoving something disgusting up her ass? agree and amplify sort of thing. she sends a twat pic, you send a pic of a baboon with a swollen ass.

      has anyone besides me ever tried this? (warning: this is IDGAF game. not for everyone. personally I just can’t see how any guy could pass up an easy opportunity to mock an obvious whore, especially when they seem to be falling from the trees these days.)

      LikeLiked by 3 people


      • on March 27, 2018 at 7:29 am bigjohn33

        If it’s a girl you’re already fucking I have found they get a kick out of selfie dick pics. Like if you know she’s at a party with her friends send her a picture of your dick. Taken from an angle so the dick looks like it is about two feet long.

        Definitely not recommended for girls you aren’t fucking.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 7:49 am Captain Obvious

        Somebody’s probably doing this already, but mass-produce some extremely high-quality 12″ rulers [with excellent engraving down to the 1/16″ marks] – only the rulers are actually 3″ long in reality – and get your production costs down to about $1.99, and sell them to dudes for dicpics at $19.99.

        I don’t know if the patent office would allow you to patent the idea. Probably not. But you could try to trademark as much of the idea as possible.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on March 27, 2018 at 11:44 am trav777

        Only a mark can be trademarked. Patents are for useful articles but you could receive a design patent which isn’t particularly useful.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 27, 2018 at 7:10 am trav777

      post to forum

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  4. on March 26, 2018 at 2:36 pm Batman

    This works without you even prompted. For example, whichever lipstick she’s wearing, say, you can tell her that lipstick is fine, but a less subtle lipstick (or whatever) would look better. This is a good way early on to see if she would quickly and readily appease you…

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 9:47 pm daysofgame.com

      It’s also a test for low self esteem…

      When you overplay this card, and a girl gives you a mild smile, and turns her back on you, because she doesn’t have “daddy issues” and an instinct to chase abuse (which is a good thing)… you lost a winner.

      Tests that disqualify you from the best girls… aren’t great tests.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 26, 2018 at 9:55 pm Captain Obvious

        DOG, I’m kinda stranded between your poast & Tiberius’s poast below here.

        I agree that this passive-aggressive sh!znat might be amusing to play on the tinder THOTs and insta-hoz [the nastiest of the beey0tches who deserve a verbal smackdown] but a lot of the abuse which is described on this thread simply amounts to breaking another human being’s psyche.

        There’s a time and place for every Game technique, but over the long haul, this one feels dangerous to me – like you’re crossing a line and heading over towards some heap bad mojo.

        LikeLiked by 4 people


      • on March 26, 2018 at 10:00 pm Captain Obvious

        Given enough time, that passive aggressive sh!znat will absolute destroy a weak-willed person.

        [On the female side of things, I’ve become convinced that the very worst amongst the passive-aggressive chicks actually seek out weak-willed men in high school & college & grad skrewl and m@rry them precisely so as to reap the tinglezzzezzezes which their Hamsters experience from driving a weak-willed man to su!cide.]

        LikeLiked by 4 people


      • on March 26, 2018 at 11:26 pm daysofgame.com

        >> I agree that this passive-aggressive sh!znat might be amusing to play on the tinder THOTs and insta-hoz [the nastiest of the beey0tches who deserve a verbal smackdown]
        — Capt Obvious

        Agreed. Plumpjack (ABOVE) talks about other tactics… and I assume that is mostly for ONLINE GAME.

        (Props to Plumpjack… it’s not my style, but I like his game in general.)

        I don’t touch online girls… and particularly “Insta-hoz” (or even girls that look like they might play that game). I don’t have an Instagram account… and it’s a fun part of my current IRL game to roll my eyes when girls bring that option up. I get a “+1” all the time for dismissing that option as I take a number… I can see it in their eyes.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 7:12 am Ironsides

        Got to agree with the Captain here. I’ve seen several people who used that passive-aggressive crap CONSTANTLY in dealings with other people, especially family members. They were not people to emulate — they were selfish, yard-wide motherf***ers, manipulative, nasty, negative, energy vampires who took positive delight after a while in making other people miserable and/or dance to the tune of their petty tyranny.

        I’ve also had a couple of wahmen try it on me, and it’s not cute or amusing.

        If the target has a strong personality, it leads to them saying “f*ck you” and leaving. If the target has a weak personality, congratulations, you’ve found a v1ct1m who can now be gaslighted and destroyed at your leisure. Not something to feel really proud about, though, I’d think.

        Sure, it’s fine as a way to take a jab at some strutting e-strumpet, again as the Cap’n says.

        But if used regularly … it’ll drive the strong away, and wreck the weak. Sure, you can achieve dominance over a weak personality by tearing it apart, but that’s pretty grotesque.

        It’s not the way the White Man should think.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on March 27, 2018 at 7:18 am Ironsides

        And I actually agree with the Turbofaggot about something. These are truly the end times.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 11:07 am Sentient

        Days

        Try never asking for contact info and wait for them to force it on you.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 1:53 pm vfm#7634

        I think the main difference is doing it passive-aggressively is fundamentally fake and dishonest, whereas if you really mean it, you really mean it.

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 2:21 pm daysofgame.com

        “If the target has a strong personality, it leads to them saying “f*ck you” and leaving. If the target has a weak personality, congratulations, you’ve found a v1ct1m who can now be gaslighted and destroyed at your leisure. Not something to feel really proud about, though, I’d think.”
        — Ironsides

        This ^ is exactly what I mean.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


  5. on March 26, 2018 at 2:40 pm Tiberius

    Good points. I accidentally did this kind of thing before becoming game aware with a beautiful blonde girlfriend of mine. I mentioned off hand that I liked belly piercings and a week later she had one. I also had kind of a thing for punk girls and told her I like those streaks of color in her hair. Next week she had a pink streak in her hair. (I now know I do not like that).

    This kind of goading is especially useful for someone like me that really likes the look of sluts but doesn’t want to commit to one.

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 7:04 pm Captain Obvious

      You break it, you own it.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 26, 2018 at 9:44 pm Tiberius

        That kind of grooming takes awhile anyway.

        LikeLike


  6. on March 26, 2018 at 2:51 pm TLM

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  7. on March 26, 2018 at 3:10 pm Buccaneer

    That Nigel character on America’s next top model had a mix of good looks and dismissive interest.

    He claims to have been faithful to his wife but the young ladies were throwing themselves at him all the time.

    It’s good to be a fashion photographer.

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 3:35 pm XDEEPR...: xdeepr.wordpress.com

      When I was in Miami Beach, I spent some time hanging around the modeling agencies. One thing I noticed was the shallowness of the agency receptionists. One (white) receptionist (this is in the 1990s, before Wesley Snipes got his 3-year jail sentence for tax evasion) was raving with enthusiasm about meeting that negroid star of Blade at some party or other. She wasn’t smitten with HIM, but overwhelmed by the FAME. This has led to me always harboring thoughts of fame, myself. Unlike him, being white, I’d be able to pork someone like that (and a million other someones) very easily. Even being good-looking, I have to put in some time and effort and charm, now. In the future . . . none, would be good.

      *slightly sly smile* Amusingly, I had one Midwestern family or somewhere take my picture, and they asked me, on their own, “Are you a model?”

      Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar.

      *suddenly sad* Damn. I miss the motorcycle I crashed on Miami’s streets. Could’ve died then.

      LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 6:57 pm jOHN MOSBY

        So you ran a fat Cuban. sow over with your moped and it was kill. Do you really think we care, turbofaggot ?

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on March 26, 2018 at 7:50 pm Ironsides

        What a flouncing, slimy poof.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 3:00 am APL

        XDEEPR: “Unlike him, being white, ”

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 7:12 am Greg Eliot

        That’s Schlomo, my friend… ya gotta get the slushy sound in there, otherwise people are gonna scratch they haids on what sort of insult slo-mo might be.

        That said, I hope the videographer picked up that term of endearment right chere at the chateau. 😉

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 7:14 am Greg Eliot

        Dustin Hoffman was apparently between roles, amirite?

        LikeLike


  8. on March 26, 2018 at 3:16 pm Libertardian

    Breitbart: ‘During Saturday’s student march for gun control, Parkland shooting survivor Delany Tarr made clear that she and other gun controllers plan to parlay a bump stock ban into numerous other gun controls.

    Tarr spoke to the crowd and Think Progress quoted her saying, “When they give us that inch, that bump stock ban, we will take a mile.”’

    This is why nothing shitlibs suggest is ever a good idea, however plausible they make it sound.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 26, 2018 at 3:40 pm Silent Bob

      In this instance, the general tendency of retarded leftwingers to always take more than they deserve is secondary. The real issue here is that a bunch of F*CKING HIGH SCHOOLERS are being given a national platform, and are being taken seriously.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on March 26, 2018 at 4:05 pm FastEddie

        lol’ed.

        LikeLike


      • on March 26, 2018 at 8:03 pm Greg Eliot

        Isaiah 3:12
        Though you are God’s people, you are ruled and abused by women and children. You are confused by leaders who guide you down the wrong path.

        LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 4:04 pm V

      Anyone else remember joe biden about a year or so ago telling all the democrat pols something like, “hold off on the gun control issue… for now”

      as if they had something “planned”

      LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 4:05 pm Declane

      They really screwed up with these Parkland kids. They’re not experienced enough to understand you don’t actually say what you believe.

      Emma “we ostracized the shooter but BELIEVE ME you would too!” Gonzalez is another one.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 26, 2018 at 8:07 pm Greg Eliot

        They don’t understand that the bully and ostracizing BY THEIR OWN HANDS AND VOICES are what lead to “snapping out” and violence.

        Actually, they probably do understand, but they’ve been given their marching orders, and like they worship creations rather than the Creator, they blame implements rather than the wielders they themselves unleashed.

        LikeLike


    • on March 27, 2018 at 12:39 pm vfm#7634

      De-Lame Tard

      LikeLike


  9. on March 26, 2018 at 5:46 pm WynnLloyd

    “…..,,.,.,sleazy professors know this “yes, but…” compliance test trick and exploit it to great personal benefit.”

    I wish they came to work here. Hugo Schwyzer is a shitlord next to the bunch I have to deal with.

    LikeLike


  10. on March 26, 2018 at 5:49 pm Marc

    Western Rifle Shooters gives another fine hat tip – or better “chapeau!” – to the chateau.

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 10:50 pm Carlos Danger

      Greg says we can’t read that one either

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 7:00 am Greg Eliot

        Read whatever comic book you want… and good luck picking out the kernels of Truth from the piles of dung.

        /Rent-free advice rape!

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 10:23 am Carlos Danger

        Such genius from such a tiny mind. Only a Yenta could do that.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 10:26 am Greg Eliot

        Now your comebacks are starting to sound like oink’s.

        If you two put yo’ haids together, you’d make one serviceable ass.

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 10:45 am Carlos Danger

        No one believes you anymore. I won. ROFLMAO.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 10:57 am Greg Eliot

        Your douchery has unbalanced you, Danger.

        This isn’t the Special Olympics… and you’re laughing a bit too loud.

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 11:39 am Greg Eliot

        You’ve certain won the t-o-m-j-o-n-e-s seal of approval…

        … and that says it all… alt-R ally.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 12:19 pm oink

        thanx for the rent-free, fischkopf

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 27, 2018 at 6:46 am Coldwarvet

      From long time reading WRSA, CA seems to have moved somewhat toward “red pill” after many years of leaning “conservacuck.”

      LikeLike


  11. on March 26, 2018 at 5:55 pm chateaudesilling

    I’m finally putting the puzzle pieces together. The fact that I am half crazy, but not totally crazy, is my greatest asset. A girl hooking up with me doesn’t know for sure if she’s going to have her pussy eaten on a bed of rose petals with some ice cubes, or if she’s going to have her pussy eaten over a bed of fava beans with a nice Chianti.

    I told one girl, “You’re pretty enough, but you’re going to have to eat more if I’m going to wear you as a skin suit when I make my grand debut as a girl.” Later, she told me she thinks I’m funny. Sometimes I warm her heart, and sometimes she’s convinced that I really am insane after all.

    After that conversation, I finally realize how high my SMV is. I don’t need to keep raising it. I need to make myself more accessible. I’m not the kind of guy you take home to your father in the suburbs. I’m the kind of guy you fuck to piss him off. That can really work for me.

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 6:59 pm Declane

      I can relate to this. I don’t even know HOW I’m weird, but I know that my weirdness is super polarizing. Some girls are instantly repulsed by me and some girls I can lure in with just a look. It’s very odd to be a 3/10 and have that power.

      LikeLike


  12. on March 26, 2018 at 7:46 pm Chris

    CBS just released excerpts from a documentary about the four anti gun kids from parkland. In it David Hogg states

    “On the day of the shooting, I got my camera and got on my bike and road as fast as I could three miles from my house to the school to get as much video and to get as many interviews as I could because I knew that this could not be another mass shooting.”

    If he wasn’t at the school how the fu@k did he take video from inside the school during the shooting?

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 10:51 pm BAZ

      Can you get some video of that interview and post it on liberal of something before it’s memoryholed

      LikeLike


  13. on March 26, 2018 at 7:49 pm Chris

    At the 4:25 mark is where Hogg states he wasn’t at the school

    LikeLike


    • on March 26, 2018 at 8:18 pm FastEddie

      What kind of a “man” sits that way?

      Whose catamite dis is?

      LikeLike


  14. on March 26, 2018 at 8:00 pm Greg Eliot

    When exactly was the Senate to vote on that nationwide concealed carry law that the House passed?

    I wonder if this latest hubbub is meant to affect that.

    LikeLike


    • on March 27, 2018 at 12:38 pm vfm#7634

      There are only 51 Senators with the “R” tag. The two RINO ladies are likely getting muh feelz due to Hogg’s march.

      LikeLike


  15. on March 26, 2018 at 10:25 pm cortesar

    get lost bitch
    jeez I would pay a substantial amount of shekels for this bird

    LikeLike


    • on March 27, 2018 at 2:17 am skorzecin150

      I was at some sort of rural (tiny) zoo place with the kids moons ago that had one of these in a big cage.

      As you walked past it would go “Psst! Come here!”

      Once you went over it whispered “Get me outta here..”

      Funniest thing I ever heard, still remember it vividly all these years later.

      Not a fan of flying rats though, almost got killed by one of the germ carrying creatures.

      LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 10:17 am Carlos Danger

        Cockatoos are very smart. There are a bunch of funny videos out there.

        LikeLike


  16. on March 27, 2018 at 8:19 am Captain Obvious

    WOKE CONGRESSMAN FROM KENTUCKY: https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/thomas-massie-broke-one-house-rule-youre-not-supposed-break-wants-rep/

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 27, 2018 at 8:20 am Captain Obvious

      ‘And I have to break it to them that their member of Congress sold out for absolutely nothing. It was social pressure. It was, “I won’t be your friend if you don’t vote for this” kind of pressure. Junior high, kindergarten-type pressure. But social pressure is real, and these are soft, pliable, pink animals that are in Congress —some of them are different colors — that have chemical reactions going on in their brains.

      I mean, they are not logical thinker beings, and they are subject to all the social pressure that everybody else is subject to from kindergarten on up. And I would say that kindergarten and junior high are the best models for how social pressure works in Congress. But I mean, I don’t want to increase revenues, or act like I’m hucking a show for somebody, but you really should watch “The Push” if you want to know how Congress works.’

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 8:20 am Captain Obvious

        ‘You know, what’s funny is when Paul Ryan came in, if you go back and listen to his speech, when he accepted the gavel, he talks about fixing the process and how we should never have to vote on a bill that we don’t understand that we’ve not had time to read.’

        < — He’s broken those promises, it seems? — >

        ‘Well, he’s broken those promises, but shame on anybody that believed him when he said that. I mean really, just shame on anybody that believed that. Most of the people who voted for him did not believe that. They were worried about the consequences of voting for somebody else, should Paul Ryan prevail in his run for speaker.

        And so, typically what my colleagues do is try to figure out who’s going to win, get behind that person, and start jockeying for committee positions, subcommittee, chairmanships, and committee chairmanships.’

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on March 27, 2018 at 8:23 am Captain Obvious

        Pay attention to the kindergarten/junior-high analogies.

        Uber-Parasites like Cuck Ryan and B!tch McConnell are PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE ON STEROIDS.

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on March 27, 2018 at 8:58 am Anonymous

        if ain’t broke, why fix it?

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 9:53 am oink

        if ain’t broken, why fix it?

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 9:59 am oink

        imo the pertinent question is:
        can a Parliament (in the long run) end up as anything else but the gaggle of cucks we see today, again and again, in US, UK, and the Continent?

        LikeLiked by 1 person


  17. on March 27, 2018 at 9:29 am RedPillPaul

    I would say, leave out the “but”.

    You look good as a blonde but i like brunette better…to
    You look good as a blonde and some highlights would make you pop or and some french nails would really turn it up.

    Point being, “but” is sometimes viewed as negative. Turning the “yes,but” to the ole agree and amplify

    LikeLike


  18. on March 27, 2018 at 9:58 am anon

    Tinder advice continued…

    Thanks for the reply CO, dont think “wrong abi” would work because our demographics dont really allow for it and these bitches methinks are primed for the smaller sample size. I would maybe get 1 bangable match per week. So being zfg is great and all but I have to find a smarter / effective way of going about this.

    Me: There once was a girl called Abi
    Matched a guy she thought not too shabby
    At first she was in it for his looks
    Then later she discovered he even cooks
    But what really won her over – how he rhymed her name so aptly!

    HEr 4:44 PM…..It’s embarrassing how impressed I am right now hahahaha!

    ME 9:12 AM Dont be embarrassed i knocked that one out the park fair and square

    ME 9:13 AM In fact if a girl ever wrote me a limerick so slick id take her out right there and then

    Me 9:14 AM But you know better than to fall for these airhead playaz with their silver words dont you

    her 1:54 PM I wouldn’t say I KNOW that with the certainty of a definitive rule…

    LikeLike


    • on March 27, 2018 at 10:22 am Captain Obvious

      Okay, here you’re gambling here on Sentient’s “Authentic, Dynamic, Passionate” approach to Game, which, for online texting/messaging, is 180-degrees opposite to CH’s Poon Commandment V: “Give your woman 2/3 of everything she gives you. For every three calls or texts, give her two back.”

      Sentient’s approach can work in Day Game IRL, but for online gaming in Clownworld, I would have stuck to CH’s V.

      At this point, you’re already losing her, because she senses [perhaps correctly?] that you’re a weirdo, and to right this sinking ship, you’ve gotta switch gears fast.

      I’d go for something like “Awww, my fiancee’s cat writes better limericks than that, < — sad face emoji — >” and attach a picture of Birthday Cake Cat.

      [Here, obviously, you’re gonna hafta concoct an entire fantasy about your fiancee and hint at what a b!tch she’s becoming as the w3dding gets closer and closer and how you wanna call it all off and blah blah blah, and then turn this chick into your Captain-Save-A-Alpha so that she can cum to your rescue…]

      But you got so wordy on her that you probably lost her already.

      “Authentic, Dynamic, Passionate” for Day Game, minimalist verbiage for online Clownworld Game.

      LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 10:32 am Captain Obvious

        OUCH – I missed this on first reading “But you know better than to fall for these airhead playaz with their silver words dont you”

        It’s amazing that she even replied to you.

        Scratch everything I just said.

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 10:34 am Captain Obvious

        Looks like you’re stuck with “Authentic, Dynamic, Passionate” – lotsa luck with that.

        Who knows, maybe you stumbled upon the 1-in-a-million chick who deserves it?

        But the odds say you’re dead in the water.

        LikeLike


    • on March 27, 2018 at 11:53 am trav777

      Opening was really good.

      afterwards, not so much…912A maybe “I get that a lot lol”

      It’s fuckin tinder tho, so you’re as likely to work with “and i haven’t even gotten undressed yet” with some kind of lmao emoji…there’s no body language to read on these hoez.

      more than half the chicks on there are only in it for some chatting and will never go any further than that. They drop dead ghost like it’s a reflex. There’s no defect in your approach if they do, either…tinder randomly works

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  19. on March 27, 2018 at 10:12 am rhasa

    we need a post for HSMV men

    LikeLike


  20. on March 27, 2018 at 10:54 am Captain Obvious

    bright spot for Republicans among millennials: Young white men https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/03/21/a-bright-spot-for-republicans-among-millennials-young-white-men/

    LikeLike


    • on March 27, 2018 at 11:37 am Greg Eliot

      Nearly 4 in 10 Democrats are nonwhite, while 83 percent of Republicans are white. Six in 10 Republicans are whites without a college degree; only a third of Democrats are.

      Note that little bit of jew-jitsu… upon first reading, one might think only 1/3 of Dems don’t have a degree (i.e. “they smarter!”), when the actual fact is, while only 1/3 of WHITE Dems don’t have a degree, the entirety of the Dems, with that heavy influx of colour, are FAR less IQ’d than Republicans.

      And I doubt that only 4 in 10 Dems are nonWhite… negro (and now hispanic) bloc voting is as old at the hills, to the tune of 90%+ negros knee-jerking the Dem levers, and 70%+ on the hispanic side.

      [CH: times have changed. “white with degree” simply means “properly indoctrinated white”. the association between credentials and smarts has never been more tenuous than now.]

      LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 11:41 am Captain Obvious

        Yeah, their numbers are badly at odds with what Audacious Epigone is reporting for Gen Zykl0n.

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 11:42 am gunslingergregi

        that is a Spanish heritage graph though that you put up think that might be an incorrect graph

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 11:50 am Captain Obvious

        In Audacious Epigone’s study, they claimed to have sampled more than 200,000 students in 2016.

        That’s a rather large study to have gotten selection bias all screwed to he11.

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 12:37 pm vfm#7634

        “Yeah, their numbers are badly at odds with what Audacious Epigone is reporting for Gen Zykl0n.”

        We should believe that poll as much as a Marist/WSJ poll showing Hillary 12 points ahead.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 1:16 pm Captain Obvious

        “the association between credentials and smarts has never been more tenuous than now”

        WSJ: Companies Have to Teach Workers Skills that They Didn’t Learn in College http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3642782/posts

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 1:58 pm vfm#7634

        ““If Thomas Edison walked through the door today, would we turn him away because we don’t have a job opening for an inventor?” Dr. Schweitzer said.”

        Rhetorical, of course. Edison would be turned down flat.

        Similarly, Mozart and Beethoven would never get hired by any university music department nowadays, because their music does NOT sound like crap.

        LikeLike


  21. on March 27, 2018 at 11:41 am gunslingergregi

    think I got old don’t really want to stay awake all hours of day and party

    LikeLike


  22. on March 27, 2018 at 11:47 am Captain Obvious

    Arianna Huffington, MUDSHARK: https://www.thedailybeast.com/arianna-huffington-denies-involvement-in-sex-cult-depicted-in-netflixs-wild-wild-country

    LikeLike


    • on March 27, 2018 at 11:48 am Captain Obvious

      Mudshark’ed herself with both streetsh!tters and j00z, then ended up with a closeted s0d0mite.

      LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 12:35 pm vfm#7634

        She’s a hardened leftist consumed by The Darkness. Are we really that surprised?

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 1:13 pm Captain Obvious

        Actually, you know vfm, when you frame it like that, I guess we shouldn’t be surprised at all.

        Still LOL’ing.

        Or at least chuckling.

        LikeLike


  23. on March 27, 2018 at 12:35 pm vfm#7634

    I like “yes, but…” and use it quite a lot.

    Plus, women do appreciate your suggestions as to how to improve themselves… even if they mock-complain about it.

    LikeLike


  24. on March 27, 2018 at 12:48 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

    Retired SCROTUS justice John Paul Stephens wrote an op Ed today in the failing New York Times calling for the outright repeal of the Second Amendment.

    This isn’t just a cranky old pensioner rambling around the house and writing a letter to the newspaper complaining about something he saw on TV.

    Anything in the NYT is deliberate and purposeful, part of a much larger and coordinated campaign. Nothing appears in that paper as a one-off or by accident.

    I wouldn’t rule it out, and it’s probably entirely possible, that the article came to bring as a result of the owner/editorial board members, was written by a team of bugmen operatives and, plopped down, without Stephens so much as glancing at it before they put his byline on it.

    Times articles are the tips of icebergs; there’s always a lot more going on behind the scenes. David Rockefeller was on record for this, thanking the times and other outlets for meeting with him and others and marketing their plans. All it takes is a meeting in Switzerland of a few major media owners, politicians, and financiers to agree “this year, we’ll push for repeal of the 2A.” Everything that follows and trickles down from that decision, including shootings, marches, and others, is the work of thousands of useful idiots and true believers, not to mention those motivated by high salaries and pensionable service, who have no inkling of the decisions made from on high.

    They want us disarmed, bottom line.

    LikeLike


    • on March 27, 2018 at 12:59 pm oink

      They want us disarmed, bottom line.

      Who dat, “dey”?

      LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 12:59 pm oink

        name names

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 2:48 pm oink

        btw, how many Lutheran SCROTI, ever? how many Calvinist?

        LikeLike


    • on March 27, 2018 at 1:17 pm Carlos Danger

      Well said and my first thought as well when I saw the NYT article. The same was true of the Pope’s recent comments about men who visit prostitutes made around the Stormy Daniels non story when it first appeared.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on March 27, 2018 at 1:24 pm Les Saunders, Protestant

        The pope is a Marxist and on the payroll too. You don’t get to that level these days without being on the payroll (except for the
        G-d Emperor, I pray for his safety every day).

        LikeLike


      • on March 27, 2018 at 2:00 pm vfm#7634

        The freaking Dalai Lama, who said Germany should not be taking in refugees, is more Christian than Frankie the Fake Pope.

        LikeLiked by 1 person



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Canadian Friend on Sweden, The Cuck Corner Stool…
    Hugh Jenniks on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Canadian Friend on Deep State Update: Keeping It…
    Corinth Arkadin on Oy, There It Is
    Corinth Arkadin on Oy, There It Is
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
    • Deep State Update: Keeping It In The Family For A Reason
    • This Is What Separate Dating Markets Are For (Or: White Vs Black Thirst)
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: