• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« ¡SCIENCE! you dirty whore: Study Proves Women Love Men Who Are Loved By Women
The Psychopath In Post-America »

When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed

April 3, 2018 by CH

The Jumbotron Test is essentially a visualization of Poon Commandments V and VI.

Jumbotron Test:

Every text or email or recordable instance of conversation you have with a girl must follow this simple rule:

If it were given a public airing, let’s say on a blog or a sports stadium jumbotron, you should feel comfortable with what you have written for the world to see. You should not feel an urge to wince, because it will be clear to everyone reading it how alpha you are. If the thought of someone other than you and your girl reading your permanently archived romantic exchanges makes you cringe with embarrassment, then you are doing something wrong that will eventually lead to your girl dumping you.

Poon Commandment V:

V. Adhere to the golden ratio

Give your woman 2/3 of everything she gives you. For every three calls or texts, give her two back. Three declarations of love earn two in return. Three gifts; two nights out. Give her two displays of affection and stop until she has answered with three more. When she speaks, you reply with fewer words. When she emotes, you emote less. The idea behind the golden ratio is twofold — it establishes your greater value by making her chase you, and it demonstrates that you have the self-restraint to avoid getting swept up in her personal dramas. Refraining from reciprocating everything she does for you in equal measure instills in her the proper attitude of belief in your higher status. In her deepest loins it is what she truly wants.

Poon Commandment VI:

VI. Keep her guessing

True to their inscrutable natures, women ask questions they don’t really want direct answers to. Woe be the man who plays it straight — his fate is the suffering of the beta. Evade, tease, obfuscate. She thrives when she has to imagine what you’re thinking about her, and withers when she knows exactly how you feel. A woman may want financial and family security, but she does not want passion security. In the same manner, when she has displeased you, punish swiftly, but when she has done you right, reward slowly. Reward her good behavior intermittently and unpredictably and she will never tire of working hard to please you.

I’ve seen, heard of, and executed some impressive text game that could publicly air to accolades from discerning viewers, but I’ve rarely seen the Jumbotron Test (or should I call it, the Jumbrotron Test) crushed so thoroughly as it was in this exchange:

Skittles Man has met his match: 2$ Big Towels Bro.

Ok ok I know what you’re all thinking…”Look at the chick, CH. It’s easy to give zero fucks when the fuck is a zero.”

No argument there. State control doesn’t operate in a vacuum; the amplitude of the disturbance matters. Still, many omegas and betas fail the Jumbotron Test under extremely favorable conditions. So give this bro some love, he spun that broad’s hamster wheel into orbit and gave the public a good laugh.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Alpha, Game | 99 Comments

99 Responses

  1. on April 3, 2018 at 5:55 pm Nads

    More than texts. Imagine your life is on a Jumbotron. A smirk wins. Aloofness appeals. Style scores.

    And for Pete’s sake act like you have there before with chicks hotter than the one you are with now.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 3, 2018 at 7:39 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozolzlzozozo

      zllzzozozozloo

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 3, 2018 at 8:06 pm Cracker

        obviously every one of those men failed for not assessing the situation correctly and proposing without knowing there was a guaranteed yes. but only an absolute cunt would humiliate someone in public like that

        all of those bitches could easily have said yes so as not to shame him for all to see then tell him later in private that it was a no go

        cold hearted bitches, all of them

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2018 at 8:16 pm cortesar

        some of these are fake but in all instances men look better than
        womenz they kneel in front of
        blessed is the kingdom of beta shmucks

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 3, 2018 at 8:19 pm Paul Murray

        > all of those bitches could easily have said yes so as not to shame him for all to see then tell him later in private that it was a no go

        Not really an option. The instant she said yes, all kinds of wheels would go into motion and the social juggernaut would be very difficult to recall.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2018 at 8:29 pm Captain Obvious

        Cracker: NEVER “propose” to a chick. Betas ask questions; Alphas issue commands.

        BETA: Will you m@rry me [and then d!vorce r@pe me in five years]?

        ALPHA < looking her squarely in her eyes > : Get off your B!rth C0ntrol.

        LikeLiked by 3 people


      • on April 3, 2018 at 8:50 pm Cracker

        no need telling me that CO. in full agreement there. point was how cunty these women are

        @Paul Murray

        i’m not buying it. public humiliation like what these girls have done (real or no) is unacceptable. she could easily be gracious in public then nip things in the bud after the fact.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 3, 2018 at 9:40 pm Captain Obvious

        Cracker, it’s a metaphysically important point for the n00bies.

        The very act of asking a woman for her hand in m@rriage sets you in stone for all eternity as her Beta Cuck div0rce-r@pe piggy bank.

        Betas ask questions.

        Alphas issue commands.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 3, 2018 at 9:49 pm trav777

        lol@ people expecting women to be “nice” to a loser and to salve his feelings. I mean, cmon now, this is women we are talking about.

        Nah, dudes shouldn’t be doing this shit. I haven’t met a woman yet who wanted a public proposal like this. Plenty who’d have said yes in spite of it, but it’s not particularly “romantic” in their minds…it’s really a man thinking that something that would appeal to him should appeal to her.

        You’d do better to take her out into the desert alone during a meteor shower and turn and look her in the eye and say “marry me.” If she says no at least there are no witnesses and a lot of empty dirt.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2018 at 9:56 pm trav777

        dudes should never do this. Girls don’t want this.

        And, what, expect a woman to have sympathy for a loser? GTFO these are women.

        Take her to the desert alone for a meteor shower. If she says no, bury her out there

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2018 at 10:32 pm Benson

        These are cringe worthy. I was nervous as hell, but I just slipped the ring on her finger. Didn’t get down on one knee, either.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 3, 2018 at 11:00 pm Major7

        Rejection porn at its finest

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on April 3, 2018 at 11:38 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        exquisite.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 3:23 am skorzecin150

        That’s some ghey ass shit. I don’t feel sorry for any of them, just attention whoring. Especially the fakes.

        Lame.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 10:16 am redone

        Common reaction among the women (1) strike the man physically; (2) run away. The need of women to protect their social standing (Hamster: I don’t want to be associated with this loser) is that strong.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 10:34 am Cracker

        interesting the reactions from some of you. you sound like female apologists to me.

        i don’t care how pathetic the men are, it should still be acknowledged that these women acted in a shitty way that is unacceptable and they should be held accountable for it.

        no matter how much of a loser a man is, he doesn’t make a woman act like a cunt. she chooses to be that way.

        if she doesn’t have the common decency to spare him from public humiliation at her hand, she is a bitch, plain and simple.

        accepting that kind of shitty behavior from women and blaming it on men is why we lose.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 4, 2018 at 11:27 am vfm#7634

        Women feed off emotions the way we feed off sex. They get off on it, even if they don’t love the dude back.

        Again, for the n00bs: a “boyfriend” is for women what a fvck-buddy is for us.

        And this… this is what eventually happens when girls keep their emotional fvck-buddies / “boyfriends” around for too long.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 4, 2018 at 11:45 am vfm#7634

        Oldie but goodie:

        The Elaborate Proposal As Mate Guarding Behavior

        LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on April 4, 2018 at 6:23 pm skorzecin150

        Cracker, no doubt these are shitty women, I think that’s a given. But men are supposed to be smarter than this. Doing something like this in a very public setting that should be a very private, intimate, special highlight of your shared lives is a total leadership fail, and if that’s an example of the decision making process of these men, then they deserve the result. In fact that’s exactly the correct result. Shitty planning = a shitty result.

        The best slant you can put on it is that both sides probably dodged a bullet.

        Gotta lol at streetshitter getting ko’d though. That should be done on general principle.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 5, 2018 at 8:05 pm Johnny Redux

        How is it that Indian men actually breed?

        LikeLike


  2. on April 3, 2018 at 6:09 pm When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed | @the_arv

    […] When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed […]

    LikeLike


  3. on April 3, 2018 at 6:34 pm Hackett To Bits

    Terse Text / Non Sequitur game is essential. If any chick is as much of a drama queen as that one, and I’ve had quite a few myself, she needs to be treated as a irritation. Hell, she WANTS to be treated that way, and she doesn’t consciously know why.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 3, 2018 at 8:01 pm Publius

      Yeah her posting that was showing him off. She actually is semi conscious of that fact. She’s showing off her man’s passing of shit test.

      LikeLiked by 3 people


  4. on April 3, 2018 at 6:35 pm Lash

    I have made this mistake even when you instructed me, even when I knew better. The shame. More, the squandered chance to put a womyn in her place when she was on the way out anyway. Onward! Upward!

    LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2018 at 8:51 pm pdwalker

      Lash, we learn more from our mistakes than from our successes – as long as we know what our mistakes were.

      Onwards and upwards.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


  5. on April 3, 2018 at 6:42 pm CalvinDecline

    One of my better exchanges…

    I’d banged this girl two or three times before, and I knew the “what are we” chat was coming, except… she threw me a curve ball:

    Her: I’m excited to see you tonight
    Me: yeah it’s a been a while
    Her: sooo you never come over to my place, I’m always coming to you
    Me: yeah
    Her: well why dont you ever come to me
    Me: …?
    Her: nevermind, I’ll see you soon 😀

    I was genuinely shocked how little work was required and how quickly it had an effect. I wasn’t quite sure what her angle was… was she just trying to regain frame, was it a sh!t-test, was she in some weird way trying to hint that she had feelings? I knew the details were irrelevant after she showed up in an enticingly low cut tank top… man that girl was stacked haha.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 3, 2018 at 7:11 pm Hackett To Bits

      Re: her angle
      It’s the unending effort to put a leash on a man, even after you’ve knocked her socks off.
      I’m going through it now with a smitten hottie.
      “Look at this dress, it’s so cute!
      Me: *grunt*

      LikeLike


  6. on April 3, 2018 at 6:44 pm Benson

    Whatever the girl looks like, this is an effective response. I also like the sarcastic heart in these situations. As in:

    Girl: You’re an asshole/you did X wrong/ blah blah etc.

    You: ❤

    LikeLiked by 2 people


  7. on April 3, 2018 at 7:05 pm Tom

    Thats nigger texting, though. Who gives a fuck what niggers text? The dude probably has a borderline retarded IQ and couldn’t read what she said.

    LikeLiked by 7 people


    • on April 3, 2018 at 7:10 pm PBR Streetgang

      Toss my kalesalad

      LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2018 at 7:14 pm PBR Streetgang

      LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2018 at 7:21 pm The Judge

      “jc penny have”.

      I want to punch a brick wall.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 3, 2018 at 7:55 pm Captain Obvious

        Might be in the UK.

        The Limeys pluralize a whole bunch of singular sh!znat.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2018 at 8:01 pm Alex the Goon

        But he said 2$ towels, not 2 pound. Magic Eight Ball says……. black.

        LikeLiked by 3 people


      • on April 3, 2018 at 8:31 pm Tom

        Look at the picture of the she-boon. Why would you even make the stretch to assume that this was British?

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 1:43 am WynnLloyd

        The weave on her is epic.

        That’s something that will never sit well with me; sewing another person’s hair on your head, even if you’re own hair is ugly and unpresentable.

        LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 1:42 am HoneyBear

      Nah, it was great. Judging only by the content of its characters.

      I love that it’s JC Penny lol a gift-wrapped turd like her, and a towel sale mister mundane, really puts the cherries on top.

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 10:52 am Clydesdale

        “Judging only by the content of its characters.”

        Heh heh! MLK would approve. Well done.

        LikeLike


  8. on April 3, 2018 at 7:20 pm The Judge

    Doesn’t count, because I’m racist.

    “Wen it gon be OURZ TIME”

    When you learn to put “AN” in front of a word, that WHEN SPOKEN, begins with a vowel.

    “An NAACP member..”

    The letter N is pronounced EN. So you use AN. For AN ‘N’.

    Naggers.

    LikeLike


  9. on April 3, 2018 at 7:32 pm Anonymous

    Off-topic, but… this kicks ass somewhere:

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 3, 2018 at 9:54 pm trav777

      I could swear I read that actually happened IRL sometime back

      LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 3:31 am skorzecin150

      What’s the bet IRL the bitch would sue his @ss for “pain and suffering”, “broken contracts”, etc, and WIN. Bigly.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  10. on April 3, 2018 at 7:42 pm Henry Mueller

    Awesome.

    This kind of occasional, unpredictable aloofness is dyn-o-mite when the chick is smitten. The only problem is that even if a guy has high value, he still usually has to invest a lot more in the beginning to reach this point.

    I think the 90/10 rule that says you have to do 90% of the talking off the open is exaggerated. She may talk your ear off. But you still have to do 80-90% of the leading and idea generation, because if she’s like most chicks, most of her talk is designed to occupy all of your time, while giving you none of her ‘gine.

    You still have to lead throughout the entire relationship. The goal is just to get so deeply in her head that you can eventually lead by not leading, i.e. aloofness. Long text convos at any point don’t have to be off limits, as long as they are 100% on your terms. I’m narcissistic and enjoy one-sided conversations where I can talk about myself and bounce my latest thoughts off someone. I just inflict it on girls instead of friends.

    Being extremely verbose, social or talkative are not liabilities IF you remember to be detached enough to walk away at will. In fact, I would argue that this “poet style” text game where I freely talk up a storm makes me MUCH more effective at keeping quality women after I’ve pulled them. I do the brooding mysterious artist trip on them and have deep, long conversations that make them say things like “Who ARE you?”(I thank Costanza every time I hear it)

    Once I establish this precedent, any takeaways I do(and I do a lot) will be infinitely more effective if she is already hooked. My best relationships were really nothing BUT long takeaways, where I established a precedent of being thoughtful, aware, considerate, and then would just reel it back in suddenly by 80%. A woman who is hooked by this point will lunge for you desperately to fill the sudden vacuum, and stay on the line for years if you want.

    Value is only ever a liability to your game if you rely on your external assets only. If you have game too and she knows it–which she will–women will not hard test you because she knows you will walk. The trick is to make her feel awash in your value before you take it away.

    This runs contrary to most advice that puts long conversations as sin #1, and sudden change of frame as #2. But personally I’ve found that if you have the skill, high investment usually equals high return that lets you coast if it’s the right kind of investment. And I MEAN investment. Some guys talk about chicks clinically as investments, but do things like “game my girlfriend.” That ain’t an investment, it’s a full time job.

    Women are like cats. I once fed an aloof cat near my place a few times, and after the second time it continued to run to me for the next year even though I never fed it again. That’s conditioning. It’s also a good illustration of stupidity. Remember it when dealing with the fairer sex: she should always feel like she’s just on the verge of getting the Big Reward. But she only gets to feed when you want it, which should be never. So you do it just enough to keep her coming back for more.

    Women are just wired this way. A cat will run to the person who gave them tuna(substitute tingles) forever even if you never open another can again. Just like they will ignore a person who actually HAS what they need and even WANTS to take care of them if they don’t have that sense of familiarity and certainty about you. It’s the tragic dilemma for betas: you will not be given an opportunity to prove yourself unless you have ALREADY proven yourself.

    This is why Game is both an art and a science, and puzzles newbies as much as Schrodingers cat. It’s sometimes more like solving a zen koan than a logical problem. If you satisfy her, she will come over. If you DON’T satisfy her, she will cum all over you.

    LikeLike


  11. on April 3, 2018 at 7:49 pm stuartsullivaniii

    My nominee for cuck of the week https://imgur.com/a/yMeet

    This is Sportsball player Lorenzo Cain btw https://imgur.com/a/VcCry

    LikeLike


  12. on April 3, 2018 at 8:31 pm hroark

    “bring the movies” still the king.

    LikeLike


  13. on April 3, 2018 at 9:31 pm Captain Obvious

    PHYSIOGNOMY QUIZ: Guess the personality.

    LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2018 at 9:34 pm Captain Obvious

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 7:55 am Carlos Danger

        She’s a Persian nationalist and can’t make little Persian Horse archers.

        LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2018 at 10:14 pm cortesar

      goys I present you this famous Spanish guide of eligible young ladies yearning to found a family aka known as
      Our Ladies of Eternal Vows”
      No more excuses, no more complaining about the lack of m_ar_riageable material

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 4, 2018 at 7:41 am plumpjack

        lolz!

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 4, 2018 at 1:04 am Nads

      We need vegan yoga control.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 4, 2018 at 2:10 am Hugh Mann

      She reminds me of a soccer player in that Michael Jackson hat – Renaldo? Aged 39, still slender, madder than a box of frogs.

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 2:24 am Captain Obvious

        She was definitely mad yesterday, that’s fo d@mn sho.

        LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 2:23 am Mr. Roboto

      The PoMo fempowerment left finally have their Eliot Rodger. pic.twitter.com/lmst0RU7hQ

      — Rollo Tomassi (@RationalMale) April 4, 2018

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 4, 2018 at 7:35 am Hackett To Bits

        It was the return of Gozer the Gozerian!

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 7:48 am Ironsides

        You’ve got that right, Hackett. 😉

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 7:54 am Carlos Danger

        This is the result of not having children at an early age. All this insanity and animal love is displaced maternal instinct.

        LikeLiked by 3 people


      • on April 4, 2018 at 8:26 am Stifler

        Tomassi is a cuck.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 4, 2018 at 11:08 am Greg Eliot

        She and Sharon Stone should have gotten together an remade an angrier version of Thelma & Louise.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 4, 2018 at 3:29 am skorzecin150

      Female JewTube shooter. Who apparently is a free speech, anti-degenerate advocate who quotes Der Fuhrer in her “manifesto”.

      Something is fishy about this. Again.

      LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 6:00 am itsme

      not all farsi speaking vegan bodybuilder trannies are like that

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 7:51 am Major7

        droll

        LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 6:32 am Greg Eliot

      Well, if nothing else, she at least chose her target based on the rationale of them being responsible for their policies, and paying accordingly.

      I don’t know if this will make a difference, but I gotta feel that, if you’re going to look to redress an issue, the appropriate target makes more sense than a random shoot-up.

      Imagine how quickly the stooge reporters of the (((MSM))) would get back to ethical journalism if, every time they tried their poz agitprop fake news, somebody showed up at the office to… correct… them.

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 8:25 am purpledragon187productions

        But are a bunch of random underlings “the appropriate target”?

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 4, 2018 at 10:33 am Greg Eliot

        “We were just following orders” hasn’t flown as a defense since Nuremberg, amirite?

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 10:35 am Greg Eliot

        Granted, the chiefs would be better targets, but a gal’s gotta start SOMEWHERE, amirite? 😉

        LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 6:34 am Craig

      the (((news))) said she was white. She looks like a fucking dot head injun.

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 10:34 am Greg Eliot

        She’s one of them Persian Aryans we’ve all been hearing about. :duckface

        LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 6:51 am Ironsides

      That is one weird looking hombre, er, wench.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 4, 2018 at 7:52 am Sentient

      menstruation is a bitch (heh)

      LikeLike


  14. on April 3, 2018 at 10:20 pm williamk

    Game tends to flow effortlessly when a guy perceives a girl as lower value and attainable. Only when a guy views a girl as better than him does he start to fuck up.

    “Natural” game is in every guy, its just the flux of his self-perceived value that determines when and on who he uses game.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 3, 2018 at 10:40 pm gunslingergregi

      good point

      LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 1:55 am HoneyBear

      A lot of important truth to that.

      That’s why it’s critical to manage your self-image, and manage your perception of others–especially females. Your default perception may be a truth, but it is not necessarily The Truth.

      Like, most girls don’t know anything, and they look mediocre without the makeup hair and clothes, and you find all that out once you get to know them. And then you wonder why you were ever anxious.

      LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 7:24 am Rudolph

      That was the biggest thing to learn for me when I first found all this stuff. Why I did well with girls I wasn’t interested in and why I did poorly with ones I liked.

      LikeLike


  15. on April 3, 2018 at 10:28 pm Captain Obvious

    Donte DiVincenzo… Most Outstanding Player of the Final Four, deleted… racially insensitive and homophobic remarks…

    LikeLike


  16. on April 4, 2018 at 12:19 am Tom

    quesiton guys:
    when a girl gives you a word answer, ”i see” or ”oh”
    do u re engage with her after 2 days, or text something stupid like gayyy

    i wanna see the context of reply but i cant cause its on whatsapp

    LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 12:25 am Carlos Danger

      Send her a birthday cat or other asymmetric text.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 4, 2018 at 6:49 am Tom

        so the more ridicuolous nonsense my reply is the better? attraction is not fully logical? she might reply with something like , ”what”, should i proceed more or ghost her for awhile

        LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 6:30 am plumpjack

      the general rule is be more aloof than her. so whatever little effort she makes you need to split that down to a third of that until you’re basically send her a single subatomic particle every billion years or until your unavailability finally spikes her interest or she starts ovulating or there’s a vacancy in her vag that needs filling.

      …or just ignore the lame text banter and hit her up every 2-3 weeks for a casual, UNLOADED IRL meetup. “heading to the pub w some friends later you’re welcome to join us. bring a friend”, or some shit like that

      and never forget: two in the hopper keeps the oneitis from turning you into a mewling pile of betatude

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 6:51 am Tom

        IRL means? yeah..im ghosting this girl for three days now i have had asked out twice, she also mentioned im kinda mysterious on text, i told her ”feeling comes and go, cheris this moment” aka try to be indifferent without explaining myself too much

        LikeLike


  17. on April 4, 2018 at 1:11 am Libertardian

    Breitbart: ‘“We’re going to be doing things militarily,” Trump said Tuesday at a White House meeting. “Until we can have a wall and proper security, we’re going to be guarding our border with the military.”’

    lolz, imagine using the military to defend your country instead of on idiotic foreign adventures (c.f. the last 100 years.)

    LikeLiked by 3 people


    • on April 4, 2018 at 1:21 am Libertardian

      I guess Blormph is done now, this idea is too cray cray even for me.

      At this rate, his next lunatic idea will be that we should have sound money instead of a casino economy run by circus clowns and pickpockets.

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 3:50 am Roy

        They’re laughing all the way from the money printing machines to their private islands…

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 8:28 am Stifler

        What is it that you have a problem with?

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 10:39 am Greg Eliot

        Check your sarcasm detector’s battery, Stiffy.

        LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 7:10 am trav777

      I’m hoping that the PRK thing is a negotiated deal for a reunification of Korea with a complete US withdrawal. This would benefit every side. Kim didn’t go to Beijing for tourism; he was summoned.

      The massing of Chinese troops on the PRK border gives me some optimism. But at the end of the day, if it happens, it will be a result of Japan. If I were negotiating with Xi, that’s what I’d have offered. A consequence of an armed and proliferating PRK is that Japan has been making noises for several years now about amending their Constitution to permit offensive capability as well as nuclear weapons. A weaponized nuclear program in PRK would have mandated the latter and this would be something very negative for China. In such a scenario, South Korea would be justified in developing a nuclear deterrent as well.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on April 4, 2018 at 7:22 am yewotm8

        South Korea doesn’t benefit. All those poor, malnourished, undereducated/underskilled norks with bad manners will flood into their country and they’ll have to figure out what to do with them.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 10:42 am Greg Eliot

        I dunno if things have changed in the past twenty or so years, but last I remember, the South Koreans don’t particularly care for their brethren up north… and if there were a reunification, the only way it would work would be if the gummint were entirely under the aegis of the South and Kim and his boys took a loooooong vacation.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 11:08 am war-damned

        want to get Kim Jong-un under the fold? threaten North Korea with a refugee resettlement program.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2018 at 11:43 am vfm#7634

        “want to get Kim Jong-un under the fold? threaten North Korea with a refugee resettlement program.”

        Why not pay North Korea to put illegal aliens in their work camps?

        LikeLike


  18. on April 4, 2018 at 6:34 am plumpjack

    whew!

    https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/981192425904500736

    LikeLike


  19. on April 4, 2018 at 10:34 am Captain Obvious

    LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 10:34 am Captain Obvious

      Donte DiVincenzo… Most Outstanding Player of the Final Four, deleted… racially insensitive and homophobic remarks…

      LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 10:43 am Greg Eliot

      Shocked… shocked to learn!

      LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 11:33 am vfm#7634

      Well no shytt… white athletes are almost always Trump supporters.

      LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2018 at 4:11 pm Libertardian

      “racially insensitive and homophobic remarks” = “letting mentally ill men flash grade schoolers in the women’s bathrooms at Target is a bad idea”

      LikeLike


  20. on April 4, 2018 at 6:34 pm Mabui

    The Jumbotron test reminds me of mom telling me that God is always watching so I need to behave even when alone. That is, if I wouldn’t do something when she is watching I shouldn’t do it. It also reminds me of the hippy attitude described in the book “Electric Koolaid Acid Test” where they said each person is always the star in his own movie. Does the person you are interacting with enjoy your movie?

    LikeLike


  21. on April 5, 2018 at 7:51 pm Johnny Redux

    Hat’s off to that homeboy for his towel response. Funniest thing I saw all week, except for CH’s comment in a more recent thread that, “Set up an easel in your bedroom and tell her you’re gonna draw a picture of her with your dick.” That was the funniest shit by far.

    LikeLike


    • on April 5, 2018 at 8:02 pm Johnny Redux

      Shits gettin’ real!

      LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Alex the Goon on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Alex the Goon on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Davy Holmes on Fred Reed’s Mexico
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Captain Obvious on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
    • Deep State Update: Keeping It In The Family For A Reason
    • This Is What Separate Dating Markets Are For (Or: White Vs Black Thirst)
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: