Men and women love differently.
I don’t mean they feel differently when in love. The emotional flavor of love feels I’d imagine the same for men and women. A sizzling of the neurons, a swelling of the thorax, a stinging of the loins. The heart palpates for anticipated meetings.
I mean what’s different is what causes love to erupt in men and women.
A man’s nice body and face can arouse a woman, but it’s not the source of her love for him. His physical features are fuel for a few weeks twixt the sheets. A woman’s deep, true, sensual love is triggered instead by a man’s attitude, his charisma, his dominance, his SELF-POSSESSION. When she idly daydreams of him, it’s that smirky sparkle and the way he speaks to her that flutters her labial shutters.
A man’s love can and often is triggered almost entirely by a woman’s body and face. Love at first sight is a timeless trope passed along by generations of romantic men because it is men who are wont to fall deeply in love with a woman merely at the sight of her exquisite beauty and banging body. Women often don’t understand this about men, and as such women will project their own love triggers onto men, and wonder, befuddled, how it is a man can fall in love with a woman after a few minutes visually soaking her up. This explains why attractive women have the bad habit of castigating easily smitten men as “creeps”, because filtered through a woman’s evolved sensibility it *is* creepy to fall in love with a man simply by looking at him and not delving more rigorously into his anima. Women don’t drink from the same love potion, and so, being the solipsistic sex, women assume the love potion form which men drink is a toxic brew.
Of course, men also fall MORE deeply in love with a beautiful woman if she also has a feminine disposition and shares traits and values with him (#1: she gets his humor). This is the kind of cementing love that is familiar to women, who operate near or at this level from the first date, always with a mind and a heart toward a stronger connection than that which is obtained via visual inspection.
I sometimes suspect that on the basis of their primal lust coupled with their yearning romanticism, men love more powerfully than most women, but a few women who have had the pleasure to submit to a dominant alpha male will love more powerfully than anything in the universe, even stronger than a mother’s love for child.

My wife loves me more than she loves our son.
I always found it strange until now. If never seen this before. As a child I always got the preferential treatment and love from mother.
This is thanks in large part to CH, so thank you.
Btw… Maybe you should do a write up on parenting for young parents every now and then. You’ve done a couple in the past as I recall, but more would most definitely help young men like me.
Thanks again.
LikeLike
“My wife loves me more than she loves our son.”
You need to keep an eye on that [assuming you have a conscience & you give a d@mn].
All women are Passive-Aggressive to a certain extent [it’s simply the nature of The Hamster to be constantly probing the men in its life for signs of Weakness], but with the very worst of the Passive-Aggressive women, they’ll actively work to destroy weak men, and I’m convinced that they get the same satisfaction out of driving weak men to su!cide as does, say, a Hannibal Lecter, when pondering a freshly cooked liver paired with a nice bottle of chianti.
If your wife is at that ugly end of the bell curve for Passive-Aggressiveness, then your son’s weaknesses will disgust her, and she will work 24×7 for decades on end in an all-out scorched-warfare assault to destroy him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
M0d keeps eating my point about the N!etzschean-Darw!nian angle to all of this, but the tl;dr is that your son needs you moar than you can imagine: You’ve gotta figure out how to toughen him up physically & psychologically & spiritually, because he’s got [what’s at least potentially] a very ugly l!fe ahead of him [absent your guidance].
LikeLiked by 2 people
While I agree that my son needs my guidance and care (and he WILL get the best of what I can supply) my wife isn’t cruel to him.
I’d take care of her if she were to act cruel with that little boy.
LikeLike
Just keep an eye on it.
Also, be forewarned that your wife’s personality is going to change substantially as she ages & passes through men0pause.
Once women become post-men0pausal, they are no longer sexual creatures, and their lives become purposeless [unless they’ve got a huge brood of grandch!ldren to worry about, which moast White women no longer have these days], and in the worst of the post-men0pausal women, that purposelessness, when combined with a predilection for the Darker aspects of Passive-Aggressive viciousness, will create a seething cauldron of venom & poison & hate, which will ruin the lives of anyone who is forced to spend substantial amounts of time in that presence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hopefully your wife won’t be quite this bad, but ALL WOMEN go Darkish/Dark as they pass through peri-men0pause/men0pause/post-men0pause, so [again] just keep an eye on her & her relationship with any boys you have by her.
[And, again, the very worst of the w!tches will experience a s@tanic t!tillation & glee & euphoric satisfaction in driving a weak boy (or man) to su!cide.]
LikeLike
I understand that, Cap.
Mine’s pretty young right now (25) so we’ve got some time. But yeah a brood she will be getting.
LikeLike
well I’ve had the love at first sight a couple of times where the eyes met and you just knew…and she knew and the both of you were like oh shit and wow they’re feeling the same thing I am. Some kind of spark that hits you.
None of them turned out particularly well, you gotta have a lot more than love to carry you to the end. I’ve had women fall in love real quick and this turns into psycho obsession style behavior most of the time. They get real passive aggressive and start trying to sink their hooks into you immediately, like dogpissing on your place to mark what they think is their territory and taking liberties all over where they have no business.
LikeLiked by 4 people
“I’ve had women fall in love real quick and this turns into psycho obsession style behavior most of the time.”
I’ve experienced this many times as well.
if it comes fast, it goes fast.
‘love at first sight’ is an over romanticized bullshit meme for women’s magazines and jew rom-com movies
LikeLiked by 3 people
Women will EAT their own child for a man they love enough.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No doubt. It’s scary af.
LikeLike
Iron Rule of Tomassi #6
Women are utterly incapable of loving a man in the way that a man expects to be loved. Women hold an opportunistic concept of love, while men hold an idealistic concept of love.
Women are incapable of loving men in a way that a man idealizes is possible, in a way he thinks she should be capable of.
In the same respect that women cannot appreciate the sacrifices men are expected to make in order to facilitate their imperatives, women can’t actualize how a man would have himself loved by her. It is not the natural state of women, and the moment he attempts to explain his ideal love, that’s the point at which his idealization becomes her obligation. Our girlfriends, our wives, daughters and even our mothers are all incapable of this idealized love. As nice as it would be to relax, trust and be vulnerable, upfront, rational and open, the great abyss is still the lack of an ability for women to love Men as Men would like them to.
LikeLiked by 7 people
>>> “women cannot appreciate the sacrifices men are expected to make in order to facilitate their imperatives”
Women, and their Hamsters, are metaphysically incapable of understanding a man’s STRENGTHS.
>>> “women can’t actualize how a man would have himself loved by her”
But Women CAN actualize how they would go about DESTROYING their men, and that’s fueled by their Hamsters’ neverending sniffing of their men for signs of WEAKNESS.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Talking about “love” on a PUA / Lothario site seems a little disingenuous, doesn’t it ?
LikeLike
I’d guess that well over 50% of all dudes reading CH in 2018 are here for LTR advice [starting with Dread Game and moving on from there].
But even the High-Schul/j00niversity kids, who cum here for advice on merely getting laid with the coeds, need to understand in no uncertain terms what they are dealing with when confronting Hypergamy & the S@tanic Hamster which has been unleashed by (((Modrenity))).
LikeLiked by 7 people
…and so you made it your life’s mission to spam the comments section with as much misleading bs as possible?
LikeLiked by 2 people
“…and so you made it your life’s mission to spam the comments section with as much misleading bs as possible?”
Here is the deal F-Street. Many people try to psychologically assess you here. I don’t need to do so. You are completely transparent to me at a fundamental level. Your writing style and comments tell me all that I need to know. You’ve haven’t always been what you are today. So you are playing “catch up” bigly right now.
Some of us were born into copious amounts of pussy potential. I was the first dude in my circle to pop his cherry at the ripe old age of 14. The girl was 13! (her 14th b-day, in fact, happy b-day!) and it was all gravy after that. When you’ve been knee deep in it from inception the hollowness and inanity is revealed over time.
It is still novel to you. Me? It has largely worn off. There will always be whores and easy lays. The take home message is, we don’t need a whole SOCIETY of them which is close to where we are now. It is of benefit to nobody because it is still the top 20% of guys reaping all the benefits and it makes women absolutely miserable but they are far too stupid to figure out why.
A return to classicism doesn’t mean you can’t choke and slap and piss on whatever beaner or zip chick you want. It just means we should strive to do more during our time here. This is what Matt King tries to communicate to you but his absurdly pontificating style and religiosity just kills the message because of the messenger in many (most?) cases.
My unsolicited .02 because I’m dat nigga w/ the deep vision.
LikeLiked by 6 people
I like your take on our buddy trav, but the left-handed seni-nod to King is a matter of opinion… man.
Some of us yeggs enjoy his “absurdly pontificating and religiosity”… if for nothing more than the respite it provides from the painfully plebeian and puerilely profane manner of parlance practiced by the rest o’ these fair-weather chow hounds..
LikeLiked by 2 people
jay, good for you man, good for you…and I mean that genuinely.
but, before you strain yourself with too much back-patting…you don’t know me. You might think you do…a lot of people have thought they did, but this is the internet, mfer. Stop and think for a second in between backpats and maybe just maybe it will come to you.
I told you this already- the avatar tells you what you need to know but it’s not for the first reason that will pop into your head.
LikeLiked by 2 people
traf & ze joofag is my favorite sock pupet
LikeLike
@JayDC
agree with some points in your ripping of Trav. But I gotta add:
TRYYYYY HARRDDD TRAV!!!!!
777 Jew Street in DC 🛫
$700 spaghettio dinner with fat tinder bitches and his son. 🍝🍝🍛🥓🍔
MMA UFC tough guy 👊🤛✋ beat up fat woman and cats
middle finger avatar!!!! hes tough!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ripp, Lo-fing-L
you kill me, bro
LikeLiked by 1 person
This hasn’t been a “PUA” site for a very very long time. Yes, “game” can be used at a most base level for that. But if that is what you see, then that is what you get.
Game expanded is simply a reaction to the poz of modernity. It allows a man to move through and bend around the artificial clown world constraints placed on him. Since we like Matrix metaphors still (blue / red pill) it is not dissimilar.
Once you deeply understand the rules of the system they can be manipulated and exploited. If you are masterful like Neo, they can be straight up broken like the laws of physics. You needn’t look farther than the Oval Office to see what a “Neo” of Clown World would look like. He breaks the system with a sledgehammer and you see the result.
So yeah, from a very pedantic myopic viewpoint game = PUA = slaying vag. But it is so much more than that. While some here would like to remain cads and just crush freely available poon I would hazard a guess that the vast majority would prefer a truly deeply loving wife circa 1950s era. Feminine, caring, fit, attractive, and loyal. This was not much to ask for in earlier less diseased eras.
LikeLiked by 10 people
PUA requires a higher IQ and greater attention span than “game.”
The degradation of living at an empire’s end hit WN hard, and hit PU especially hard. Roosh and CH really don’t compare to Style or Mystery.
I don’t mind saying that PU in 2005 was miles ahead of where it is now. The genetic capability to run that sort of game is dying.
You can see for yourself.
http://www.seductiontuition.com/unknown/truth-about-women.html
Jay, you know the “thug lovin / gangsta loving” opener?
“Hey guys. I’m doing a poll. Which is superior… which do the ladies prefer more… THUG LOVIN’? or… GANGSTA LOVIN’?
Well, my gf from work said gangsta because its more hard-core whereas thug lovin is more like a hobby. But my other gf said gangsta would be disrespectful, like they’d pistol whip you and run a train on your ass, whereas thug lovin, the dude is hard, but when it comes to the ladies, he’s smooth and sensitive… blah blah blah…”
LikeLike
>>> “You can see for yourself.”
???
Setting aside the fact that the dude can’t CSS/DOM/HTML to save his life, I skimmed through that crap and didn’t see a thing that was even mildly interesting.
LikeLike
@Ryu
Stopped reading at “picks up any woman at any time with 80% efficiency.”
Utter BS.
Also disagree CH and Roosh are behind the early dancing monkey days of 2005.
That stuff was just training wheels before you implement it into your character
LikeLiked by 3 people
the 50s…lol.
You know what the 50s were? The zenith of pedestalization, where all work was removed from women and all they had to do was look pretty.
How’d they react to all that? Men gave women what they thought women wanted and it turned out the opposite.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Jeez, Louise… youse yeggs have GOT to start hanging with a better class of women.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, it was the first generation of latch-key kids grown into teens whose dad was off fighting a war and mom came home from the factory too tired to raise them properly during their formative years.
And when dad came back home, after he’d seen Paree and had a few bullets whiz past his haid, well…
… and in the back of his mind, wondering what mom was REALLY doing with 4F Jody and the plant foreman in his absence, well…
… how were you going to keep EITHER of them down on the farm?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Gayg, no it wasn’t.
the women who were working during the war and were at home in the 50s were adults when the war started. The baby boom came after that.
Nobody sane sits around obsessing over who their woman fucked years ago, if you are worried about it don’t get with her in the first place
LikeLiked by 1 person
“the 50s…lol.
You know what the 50s were? The zenith of pedestalization, where all work was removed from women and all they had to do was look pretty.”</i?
Jay: 'Hey, Trav– check out that forest over there!'
Trav: 'Where? Is it behind those trees? I don't see it…'
LikeLiked by 2 people
Grown the fuck up already with that ‘gay’ South Park bullshit. (((shakin’ mah haid)))
There were plenty of teens during the war that were the adults of the 1950’s, Sherlock… and plenty of 20-something women working during the war… besides, where and when do you think the meme of “bored housew-i-f-e” started? That’s right, the Golden Age… after all them gals working in the forties were forced back into their kitchens when the men came home.
Not sure what the point was here… the latch key kids I spoke of during the early forties were sort of caught between the Greatest Generation and the true Boomers, but were probably considered closer to the latter, culture-wise. The younger of that era were the ones who later went nuts for Elvis and swallowed “race music”, hook, line, and sinker, and the older became the “Beat” generation… I guess the latter were worse, and probably felt the sting of no dad being around the most during their adolescence.
Ah, there’s that Alinksy “obsessing” again… I merely mentioned a point about how American naivete’ and innocence had been changed forever by WWII, and much of the Golden Age of the fifties was merely a facade trying to keep a lid on what many prophets saw as the coming malaise. I didn’t say a bunch of guys came back brooding over their suspicions.
Part of the propaganda of wartime is chiding the enemy about the w-i-f-e or girlfriend being untrue, the examples are innumerable, and don’t tell me it didn’t pass through the minds of the soldiers coming home… one of the hallmarks of the late forties and fifties is that strong and silent manly stoicism, where not too many questions get asked about what went on back home, nor what went on overseas, for that matter.
But as we see from both popular culture depictions (Swing Shift, The Man In The Grey Flannel Suit, etc., etc., etc.) and how society has progressed over the past few decades, the seeds of discontent were already sown on many levels during that Golden Age.
LikeLike
“Well, my gf from work said gangsta because its more hard-core whereas thug lovin is more like a hobby.”
I’ve seen the pictures of Lisa Page. Is that the best you can do?
LikeLike
I’d like to hear more about the 1950s please.
It idealized and idolized and I wonder how true that was.
The US was obviously not destroyed from WW2 and it seemed to have an increadible standard of living.
Any time I am in a hotel PBS seem to have a documentary on the building of Disneyland and the images from the 1950s mainly of fit, healthy and fresh looking people blows todays society away.
Alot of 1950s movies ooze class.
Yet the shitlibs in Mad Men paint this era as oppressive etc
My Dad grew up in the UK in the 1950s ‘Brylcream’ summer…and he was very sophisticated..always every day wore a suit. (think Peter West…Brian Moore from the tv for any UK readers here)
My beautiful Aryan blond model mother grew up in the early 1960s and was feminine..great cook..beautiful..loving etc.
It was so impossible for me to find that in a wife.
My aunties grew up late 1960s and by then the trash culture has set in…they’ve had abortions…done drugs…affairs… don’t cook etc…and my cousins turned out to be trash
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jay apparently I have to be blunt-
the 1950s were an idealized potemkin village. They weren’t real.
They represented the worst impulses of men, and you have transmogriphied all of it into a supposed virtue.
it’s not GOOD FOR WOMEN to have nothing to do, no work, nor is it good for men to try to “help them” have easier lives by saving them from the shit they NEED to keep occupied with.
JFC how much SIMPLER can I make this? It wasn’t ANY BETTER TIME FOR MEN in the 1950s than in the 1920s or the 1820s. It was easier for WOMEN.
let go of the goddamned pedestalization and your fucking misguided desire to save fucking women. Let them goddamned be ffs.
Gayg- just please, for the love of god shut the fuck up for once. There were no mfing latchkey kids in that generation; they all had extended families, including grandfathers and other men too old for the war. Also all the extended females in the family. STFU you fucking boomer apologist. BOOMERS gave us latchkey kids.
The rest of you crap is strawman fantasy that ALL OF YOU FAGGOTS suffer from, worrying about your effing gf all the damn time, the supposed chads out there you’re competing against. Look I get it, your dick is inadequate, whatever…move the fuck on already.
LikeLike
trav, you have this uncanny ability to make posts of solid rationale and healthy skepticism, and then turn around and become the biggest know-nothing douche chill poseur and try-hard flouncer known to the chateau.
How about, in those moments you feel the need to project your frustrations, YOU just SHUT THE FUCK UP already?
You fairy.
LikeLike
@Ryu
http://www.seductiontuition.com/unknown/truth-about-women.html
bro after I connected via dial up I could read the site better…
The origins started in the 90s with IRC groups. straight dry ASCII. evolved to forum sites, local lairs, into the 2000s….rest is history
LikeLike
It’s more about understanding the desire of both sexes. You’re more likely to understand the correct course of action when you understand others goals and drive of others.
LikeLike
I would go a he11uva lot further and say that it’s about realizing that men understand what they want in women, whereas women have no earthly idea what they want in men [because the moistening of the v@g is triggered entirely in the hindbrain].
OTOH, if you tap any chick on the shoulder, and ask her what she does NOT want in a man, then she’ll immediately hand you a 350-page [8.5×14 legal paper] single-spaced PhD dissertation on what she dislikes about men.
tl;dr == Her Hamster is clueless as to your strengths, but it knows your weaknesses better than you do; her Hamster has already sniffed weaknesses in you that you didn’t even realize you had, and her forebrain is busy working overtime trying to figure out how to exploit those weaknesses.
LikeLiked by 3 people
We’re here for TRUTH
LikeLike
Has the turning point arrived ?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fey fellows using the “leftists are the REAL racists” argument are so 14 minutes and 50 seconds ago.
What else you got?
LikeLike
That still leaves me 10 seconds to get the message out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Touche’
But the point still stands… we haven’t been winning that argument for 30 years, and won’t win it for another 100.
And the clock’s ticking…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Taking bets on how many of these are for “unlimited energy ” , cancer / disease mitigation. No modes of travel. You get the picture.
” Five thousand inventions in limbo and under “secrecy orders” at the US Patent Office ”
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/06/28/five-thousand-inventions-under-secrecy-at-us-patent-office-space-force/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just what the chateau needed, another series of CTs.
Let’s get Alex Jones and Q on the case, I’m sure they’ll suss it out…
… assuming, of course, that there’s no already a slew of YouTube videos spilling the straight skinny. :duckface
LikeLike
Why are they held in secrecy ?
LikeLike
Your own article answers that question… and contrary to current fashion, I believe there are justifiable instances of national security.
That said…
Of course, patent office ‘secrecy’ is almost laughable… the gummint has the key and can pull out whate’er they wish… and that means all their (((friends))) have the key as well.
Wha, you think if there was such a thing as free energy and a cure for cancer that any man, woman, or child in Israel would be on chemo or walk to the bus stop?
LikeLike
Good grief. The PTO has a statutory duty under 35 USC 181 to impose secrecy orders on inventions for one year periods. They have to be renewed annually. Their scope is limited: disclosures that could be of benefit to foreign countries in a way that adversely impacts our national security (3 different types of secrecy orders under the implementing regs, military tech; patents generated through access to top secret data and/or govt resources; or patent apps you want to file in a foreign country). The patent applicant can seek relief from this provision at any time. Most of these applications are in the last category, and get a routine approval to get the foreign filing license. As to the former two, this is getting more use since under WTO policy you can file a U.S. patent application and have it go published and into the international patent application arena quite quickly. As for the amount, we are nearing patent number ten million. Patent no. 9,000,000 issued in 2015. A hold on 5000 applications is nothing relative to the million issued in the last 3 years. In fact, given the nature and extent to which the Chinese have tried to secure our military and pharma technology through IP theft and other means, US Govt probably is underutilizing the provision. And while everyone loves to bash on big pharma, they get at least 60% of their US revenue in any given year from Medicaid/Medicare patients. There will never be a “cancer cure”–cancer is a generalized description of the phenomenon where a given cell in the body experiences uncontrolled rapacious growth; how and why the cell does that will arise from hundreds of different reasons to environmental triggers, genetics (both mutation and degradation of normal growth/feedback systems), immune system suppression, hormones, inflammation, multi-pronged cascades, and many other reasons we don’t yet know or understand. When pharma does find something that remotely works, they are out with it as fast as they can. (And, in fact, a lot of those fancy cancer drugs, like Gleevec as one historical example, are pushed out as fast as they can–there is huge money to be made for any drug that moves the cancer needle by even 6 months; then once proof of concept is there, everyone else jumps in with their own me-too approach).
LikeLike
Good to hear from someone actually in the know…
… it’s amazing how many “suspicious” things dissipate like fog on a sunny morning when somebody with experience and knowledge chimes in.
Ockkam’s Razor cuts again!
+1
LikeLike
We love their sight,
They love our might.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“A man falls in love through his eyes, a woman through her ears.”
― Woodrow Wyatt
LikeLiked by 3 people
We love their sight,
They love our might.
LikeLike
“Our Might” from THEIR point of view.
Which isn’t necessarily OUR point of view [otherwise the species would have long since gone extinct from dudes murd3ring one another].
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nein. Mammals outbreed murder
LikeLiked by 1 person
Except it would be radical inbreeding [only the handful of surviving Peak Alphas would be breeding with harems of tens or hundreds of womynzzzezzezes], and with that degree of inbreeding, then I doubt we would have evolved to the point of self-awareness & consciousness.
LikeLiked by 1 person
huh? you’re talking gibberish
LikeLiked by 1 person
If women got what THEY wanted, in a secluded village with 128 women & 128 men…
The men would square off in a 7-round [2^7 = 128] single-elimination tournament-to-the-d3ath, with the sole man who emerged alive being crowned the Peak Alpha, and the 128 women would then become his harem.
Which works great for that very first generation, and the man then has 256 ch!ldren by the 128 women, to form the second generation, except that every ch!ld in the second generation is now either a half-sibling or a full-sibling to every other ch!ld.
So after running through the tournament-to-the-d3ath a second time [with br0thers & half-br0thers s1aying one another to advance to the next round], the winner will create the second generation with his myriad half-sisters, and it will be riddled with mental retardation & haemophilia & Tay Sachs & psychotic disfunction, and by the third or fourth generation, the offspring will be little better than ch!mpanzees.
BTW, I’m convinced that this is what already happens in Da Hood [s/p the breakdown of the simian family in the 1960s] – a handful of Peak Gangstas are the Baby Daddies to anywhere from 25 to 50 women each, and even as early as the first generation, you’ll have half-brothers & half-sisters [completely unbeknownst to one-another] pairing off and making idiot n!glets [grandch!ldren of the original Peak Gangstas] with IQs in the 50s & 40s & 30s.
LikeLiked by 3 people
— If women got what THEY wanted, in a secluded village with 128 women & 128 men… The men would square off in a 7-round…
Good illustration.
Now, if something very different were implemented: parental oversight of pairing, strict m0n0gamy, v1rgin mrriege for both sexes, no dievirce allowed…
… would the ladies be less happy or would they be healthier and calmer?
LikeLike
@Captain Obvious
Afro-Muslim breeding patterns are, unfortunately, currently winning at the basic Darwinian level. G0d must really be p!ssed at the human race.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fundamentally the West has to STOP FEEDING THEM… especially feeding them for free.
Somehow, the idea is floating around that Nigerians and all the rest are growing their own food.
From Iran and Iraq on over, these nations are massive food importers.
If we’d stop feeding them, they’d have to return to their farms.
LikeLiked by 2 people
never mind that it’s ABSOLUTELY FALSE.
you don’t know a fucking thing about women, Oblivious. Get out and meet some.
Women DO NOT WANT TO SHARE amongst each other, they want sole possession. The WOMEN would want a 128-woman conflict to decide who got to be with the winner…all they do is fight with one another.
Look, I get it, you’re not alpha. You’re not a chad…get the fuck over it and do something with yourself so you are not a walking insecurity, ffs
LikeLike
I would imagine the younger generations of American men likely have never experienced love at first sight due to the drastic fuglificatication storm that first rolled onto the scene in the early 90’s.
With 6’s now being treated like 8s & 9s, these young guys that are resisting the poz have to be shaking theirs heads and going ‘Fuck that love at first sight shit’. They likely think us GenX’s are gay for even bringing it up. They have no reference point, their whole lives they’ve been surrounded by mediocre looking women.
LikeLiked by 5 people
good point
i think that’s where a lot of the digs at us older gents come from.
they say we pedestalize, we are delusional about there being good girls, etc because they simply aren’t encountering decent girls most of the time. sad
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apparently muscle tone has been outlawed since the millenium. I must’ve missed the memo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yeah, either no muscle tone or too much
hardly ever see girls with the right balance of soft curves (boobs, hips, ass) on a thin feminine frame
most girls today seem to fall into three categories
fat (obese)
skinny fat with flat ass, no tits, shoulders wider than hips
man arms with visible abs, fake tits, and an unnaturally bloated ass from too many squats
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t forget the forward head carriage from constantly staring at the phone.
LikeLiked by 5 people
I recently heard about a college student in Paris..first time away from home…in Paris. .the city of love…and she meets a guy ….on tinder
I feel sad for millennials…very few of them will experience flirting…romance… dates etc.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And reading CH is like a punch to the head especially about sexual polarity.
Driving around my area the other day I’d say I found 5% of women i saw to be attractive. Its depressing and with the lack of beauty in today’s world…any actual beautiful girls have 4,000 Facebook friends…2 000 followers and are either modelling… sales reps or doing sex cams/porn
Even that hot Russian soccer fan at the games…turns out she did porn
LikeLike
Take it from someone who was there during peak pharma/med device sales, they ain’t what they used to be. Any national sales meeting you felt you were on Linda Carter’s version of Paradise Island (Not the modern butched up ((())) version). And if Merck had a meeting at your same hotel, the quality of the women was greater than anything Miami, LA, or NYC could throw at you in their primes. Not any more. There are still some hotties, but this once great bastion of high quality looking chicks has been overrun with fatties (This in of itself would have never happened pre-1999, they couldn’t get hired), the plain jane brigades, and the aging sloots that still have good bodies, but their faces are horrendous due to too many fillers which gives them a cartoonish look, and high road mileage.
LikeLike
“#1: she gets his humor”
I think it was an old Emo Philips joke about how women say the best thing in a man is his sense of humor.
He said something along the lines of “Sure. That’s why every teen age girl has a poster of Shemp on her bedroom wall.”
LikeLike
You will see it on EVERY online dating profile but it is more herd mentality horseshit.
A guy who just makes me LAUGH!1! Clown game, FTW. They say this because it is the “correct” answer for social credibility, It is that old saying over and over again. Watch what they DO, not what they say.
You will never see a female dating profile telling the truth. I want a rough and tumble alpha who isn’t afraid to control me at a moment’s notice, fuck me like it is the last day on earth, and not listen to my incessant bitching. Rich, tall, and handsome would be nice too.
That is the real profile of virtually every americunt in existence. The shit they write on the page is basically vapid virtue signaling herd mentality hot air. Why I rarely read a word of those things when I was still exploring that scene back in the day.
LikeLike
“We believe in equality… an all inclusive multi cultural society…no human is illegal…we are all immigrants”
As the white shitlib girl lives in a 3k a month apartment in an 85% white urban area with a median household income of 100k.
LikeLike
Jay…I started to see these real life personals on seeking arrangement and on craigslist before it was shut down over the last 2 maybe 3 years
‘Must have big dick… at least 7″..9″ preferably ‘
LikeLike
lol…it’s actually true.
They do want a man who makes them laugh….or more accurately a man who is INTERESTING.
I mean, you were the VERY FIRST guy in your circle to get laid, remember, you learnt this by now, no?
Fucking pro fighters get cheated on, so do soldiers. Primary complaint- they’re BORING. Maybe you just forgot or something
LikeLiked by 2 people
i get what you both are saying but CH’s point still stands
it’s not about whether or not women love funny men as much as they say they do.
point is that your girl should giggle at your jokes, think you’re funny, clever, etc. and light up when you do something you think is fun
if she’s rolling her eyes at your jokes, mocking you, looking at you with disgust instead, that’s a serious problem. if that begins very early on in the relationship, you’re in for a world of hurt if you try to make a go of things long term
in reality, your girl isn’t going to think everything you do is funny. obviously. but it pays to find a girl who is at least on the same wavelength as you.
if she likes fart jokes and crass humor but you are a fan of intellectual humor and witty plays on words, you’re going to have serious problems.
even if she’s a low IQ idiot who should be grateful just to have you in her presence, she won’t respect/desire you like she would a dumb brute who mocks intellect and thinks f-bombs, belches, and farts are high level humor
besides that, a girl who doesn’t get your jokes is no fun. why bother
LikeLiked by 4 people
Good observation, Cracker… an occasional eye-roll is okay as long as she smiles… if she gets “that look”, like you’re a bother, then might as well head on down the road.
I can’t tolerate a women upon whom jests fall flat, or at least she can’t play along…
I won’t.
LikeLiked by 2 people
she’s a homewrecker dot com
https://shesahomewrecker.com/
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Homewrecker” is such a quaint term… back in the day it was one of the worst epithets one could imagine for a gal… nowadays it seems downright charmingly euphemistic.
O tempora! O mores!
LikeLiked by 1 person
And speaking of loving like a woman…
This chubby sloot is one of the favorites of Little Steven’s Underground Garage… here’s her anthem to cunnilingus, so pay attention soy-boys.
In all fairness, her actual studio records sound much better… but who cares?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cocaine is a hell of a drug.
LikeLike
This makes me glad I’m an old fart now. The way she’s gyrating you can almost see her dick.
For some reason I thought of Pat Benetar in her prime. Just stood there looking beautiful and belted out songs with that nuclear voice. Now we have Soriasis.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kim Wilde….sigh
LikeLike
If I was their manager, I’d change the name. Not accessible enough. Possible new names:
Hyena Clit
Sorevag and the Beta Orbiters
Reverse Polarity
LikeLiked by 4 people
Droll.
LikeLike
Reverse Polarity FTW!
LikeLike
Actually, Chubby Sloot would make a hell of a band name. So would Cocaine Is A Hell Of A Drug.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yep, very masculine in her movements, way of singing, and the lyrics
makes sense
it’s always the most manly sexually dysfunctional women who spout off like this. demanding that men please them, telling them how to do it, saying the only way to please them is to go down on them, man up!, etc
sad thing is all the men who will submit to women like this just to get subpar action and throat cancer
LikeLiked by 1 person
Total shyte both musically and lyrically. Busted chubster lead singer.
I see your trash fire and raise you the only half-spic girl I would have dated back in the day. Dunno how she looks now but she was a banger in the late 90s when all the shoe-gazer shit was all the rage. Thin, tight package, long hair, very feminine in mannerism and vocals.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Goddamn jewtube lets try that again…
LikeLike
Sorry for the spam, last try… this is so effing annoying.
LikeLiked by 4 people
that’s some good stuff right there
LikeLike
Hope Sandoval. Yep. Definitely.
“Shoe-gazer shit”
Haha also yep.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry, fellas, I don’t see the attraction… tits like a sparrow, eyebrows you could plant corn in, annoying ever-popular tortured artist affectation, half-spic, half-jew looking..
Meh.
Note that I posted my video as an “ugh” example in re “love like a woman”, so I’m not sure why this video came into play.
LikeLike
“eyebrows you could plant corn in” I fucking LOL’d that is comical Greggy.
As to your question of why Hope Sandoval appeared at all— a palette cleanser. Think of eating a highly garlic laced meal and needing an after dinner mint.
As for the rest of your observations, not much to say. Tits like a sparrow are right up my alley because now, 20 years later, her tits are RIGHT where they were in her early 20s. Some voluptuos chick w/ huge knockers in her 20s is lifting her tits up from her waistband in her 40s. Pass.
She is highly “affected” yeah but I prefaced the shoe-gazer crap in my comment. Though in her case, I don’t think it was an act. She was painfully shy on stage and just added to the demure fem-vibe. She has a very “earthy” natural vibe I find very appealing without crossing over into the gross tree-hugger hippy domain.
To each his own though. One man’s trash and all that innit?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I liked “Fade into You” (Sandoval) the moment I heard it in ’94. Dream realm stuff. Politically I’m hard Right because I have no other choice, but temperementaly I like a lot of the talent that got coopted by nation-wreckers.
Another song that blew my mind when I first heard it (1993) and I still enjoy, despite the artist’s grotesquerie: “What’s Up” by 4NonBlonds.
LikeLiked by 1 person
ah shit i like the same chicks…I had one like this recently, like artsy chick, she was white, 20. immediate chemistry…like that bohemian tortured soul vibe…lithe body…similar kind of folksy breathy vocal effect…she was a singer as well. I did a duet with her naked on skype while we were still in the talking stage lol. she plays guitar as I do. financial train wreck tho lol, her credit score was probably not much higher than her age .
LikeLike
PA, that 4NonBlonds song takes me back to high school days. I always liked that song, as corny as it is, and still do.
And on the one-hit wonders of the 90s, I also dug White Town’s “Your Woman”
That beat still holds up, IMO.
LikeLike
That tune sounds very familiar, almost like it was already a big hit for someone else. It’s just a feeling I Can’t Explain.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yep
and the sloot probably thinks she’s edgy and cool for taking a classic tune and making it vulgar. gross.
LikeLike
Is that a jew nosed kike doll singing to me folk song? I just gotta ask.
LikeLike
Speaking of kike noses, Townshend’s beak ain’t nuthin’ to sneeze at… a real beezer on that geezer, amirite?
If I didn’t know better, I’d swear even he was (((tribal)))… please God, say it ain’t so!
LikeLike
>>> “Best pop bands”
Whatever happened to The Cure?
For a very brief time, “The Head on the Door” was all I heard anyone playing on their stereos, and they would play it over & over & over again.
Then The Cure simply vanished.
Granted, I don’t listen pop music, but that thing with The Cure was exceptionally intense there for a while.
Does The Cure show up on oldies stations now?
LikeLike
A lot of those late New Wave bands, though popular in some circles, weren’t really “pop” nor (((mainstream))), and have fallen off the earth except for some fringe stations on Sirrius radio.
Cure, New World Order, Smiths, etc., etc., etc.
LikeLike
Aw hell, I’m the original Who fan, but just because the first two chords sound alike doesn’t make it even close.
That would be like saying You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet infringes upon Baba O’Reily.
There’s a reason chord progressions ain’t copyrightable, fer cryin’ out loud.
Attention span, boys… attention span.
LikeLiked by 2 people
no doubt you’re right GE
but in my defense. when comparing the two vids, i only watched past the first few chords of that first video
had already watched it once, couldn’t stomach suffering through the whole thing again
LikeLike
Why would I waste any more ‘attention’ than a cursory 30 second listen on that musical excrescence?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fair point, I don’t blame anyone for not sticking with it… but I do blame false comparisons, especially when the Who is in question.
I usually don’t post such dreck, but the topic of love like a woman brought that song to mind because it was one of the Underground Garage’s top songs of the year, go figger.
Even XM radio, as part of the (((MSM))), has to encourage grrl power and beta advice, amirite? 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Who is the greatest rock band evah. I dare anyone to debate me on this.
LikeLike
Best rock bands:
The Doors
Guns N Roses
Led Zeppelin
Pearl Jam
Pink Floyd
REM
U2
Best pop bands:
ABBA
(that’s it)
LikeLike
Joy Division…the band of the alt right!
Classic songs such as The House of Dolls..
Front 242…
Kraftwerk
LikeLike
I am sure you meant Goy Division
LikeLike
Let’s just say they are arguably the greatest rock band of all time…
… and you’ll get no argument from me. 😉
Who’s Next, nuff said. Two “rock opera” albums that stand the test of time, to the point where they sustained two ACTUAL feature length story films and a Tony-winning Broadway show, numerous rock and pop hits, case closed.
The Doors – not bad, but catalogue is thin
Guns N Roses – see The Doors
Led Zeppelin – definitely in the top 5, but more pyrotechnics than musicality
Pearl Jam – please
Pink Floyd – Top 10, but hard to identify with the music
REM – see Pearl Jam
U2 – overworn, overrated, and damn near everything sounds the same, especially because of that cunt Bono.
and one final observation HELLLOOOOOO! Ever hear of
Def Leopard and AC/DC?
Best Pop Band(s)
ABBA – no question
Beatles – at least until their last couple of effete albums
B52s – yeah, okay, ghey birds, but the stuff you never heard on the radio is actually big time party material.
LikeLike
Greg, we see eye to eye on the muzak. Quick story about U2: It was 1982, and the J.Geils Band was coming to town. Remember them? They had a couple of monster hits, then faded out quick. Anyway, some friends and I got tickets, and found out U2 was opening. Barely heard of them, they’d just released a song called Gloria. Back then they were considered Punk. So at the venue about half the crowd were punkers for U2, half were normies to see J. Geils.. Punkers had the spiked hair, safety pins through their nose, all that. The coliseum held about 10,000. The lights go down, curtains go back, and Bono walks up to the mic and says “Hello, we’re U2, we’re from Ireland” and they launched into a song. The whole place went BANANAS. Instantly. Seriously, that’s all he said. I’ll never forget it. I still don’t know how that happened. Their set was supposed to last about an hour, but they played closer to 2 hours, and I’m telling you, everybody was on their feet THE WHOLE TIME. They crushed it so bad that when poor J. Geils Band took the stage everybody was exhausted. Greatest concert I’ve ever seen. There was no doubt these guys were gonna be yuge. For quite a few years I was a yuge U2 fan, but eventually Bono became a pompous ass and I drifted off. I’ll never forget that moment, though.
LikeLiked by 4 people
People like Rock bands because they associate the music with their youth. But also because the really good stuff is a bit of an acquired taste in the sense that you have to digest it a bit before you ‘get it’. For me The Who is about that “Teenage Wasteland” song that does nothing for me. So when I shrug off that band, that’s literally an uninformed opinion on my part.
Same with dismissing other great bands. Sure. Bono is a cunt but so is just about every rock star in his own way. Hotels were trashed and undreage girls were defiled since the first recording studio opened. Got to separate the artist from the art. He is a conduit between the transcendent and material. Artists have to be rent-seekers so that someone pays the rent, and Bono took that Irish genius to the highest bidder.
Their old stuff is pure passion. “Bad” is a good example. The height of their career, “Achtung Baby” is a top 10 album.
Same with REM. Genius creativity on some of the older stuff. Awesome experimentation on their mature songs like “Drive.”
Pink Floyd’s is the greatest slow to mid-tempo music ever. I dont relate to the hallucinogenic lyrics but I only pay attention to lyrics of it’s something I care about. Otherwise it’s about the music, lyrics are just for stream of consviousness.
Pearl Jam’s “Ten” album is a perfect pathos of guitar and vocals.
A contemporary band I hadn’t mentioned: Foo Fighters.
Bands with narrow range that did what they did brilliantly: Boston, Rush.
[CH: good point about really great songs having to be digested. It’s why upbeat pop songs that sound catchy on the first listen wear out quickly and you never want to hear them again.]
LikeLiked by 3 people
Music is always a “hot button” with folks, and everybody likes what they like… better to argue politics and religion. 😉
I can see how that concert with U2’s first foray into America would make for a lasting memory… when they first came out, I myself thought them pretty good, but after two listens of Joshua Tree, the MEH settled in… and Bono’s later more open politics sealed that deal (A paeon to MLK, fer cryin’ out loud?).
For me, I’ve never really been able to separate the artists from the music, and if I didn’t care much for the persona(e) of the band, the music felt likewise tainted.
Note I’m not necessarily talking about “bad behavior”… sometimes it’s just a vibe you get from people and you either click with them or they leave you cold.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cortesar..House of Dolls turned out to be a fake book about the Holocu$t. Who’d have thought that?
They also had a song called Atrocity Exhibition after the JG Ballard book which is about freaks in a freak show. Kinda reminds me of what we have now in the urban cities ..an Atrocity Exhibition.
LikeLike
“Best rock bands:
The Doors
Guns N Roses
Led Zeppelin
Pearl Jam
Pink Floyd
REM
U2”
We have found some common ground at last PA, there is hope yet! 🙂
I’d clip the bottom 2 entries off that list though. REM and U2 are sycophantic lefty cunts of the highest order. I try to separate the music from the musician and can to some degree but when it is egregious as in their case, it is difficult.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When I dared anybody to debate me on this, I forgot about PA.
I’m like Greg again about separating artists from their work. I want to, but I just can’t seem to. Got disinterested in U2 when Bono went faglib. Same with Springsteen. The biggest disappointment was Steve Earle, an Alt-Country monster in the 90’s. A bad-ass like him aged into a fat uninteresting libtard.
Over time, if their music holds up, I can start to forget about what turned me off, but never completely.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Last thing about music. For your listening pleasure, I call this Black Kryptonite:
LikeLike
You and Delicious Tacos need to cowrite a fucking book already! Seriously, u wanna die in obscurity with your brilliant talent for writing? Still hoping u will write your magnus opus Predator Sluts someday…
LikeLike
Predator Sluts is another great name for a rock band
LikeLike
Illegal aliens vs Predator sluts. “No matter who wins, soy boys lose”
LikeLiked by 1 person
has ron paul had enough
LikeLike
that picture was not the original one
this was (replaced later by Paul)
(((they))) are exploding as we speak
LikeLike
I could have done it without the blaspheming.
LikeLiked by 1 person
shut up idiot
LikeLiked by 1 person
SHABORTESAR!
and of course neither “Protestant” nor cathcuck anywhere to be found when the Lord’s Name is taken in vain by Shabbos Apostate.
you are like lukewarm water, neither hot nor cold
LikeLike
Ron Paul and his crew were always /ourguys/.
LikeLike
His son is a cuck.
LikeLike
I wonder if Rand knows how many of us laughed our ass off when he got tackle-raped by that lunatic Boucher
LikeLiked by 1 person
Delicious Tacos is one of my favorites. The fact that he isn’t well known and Tucker Max is, is one of the grave injustices of our era. I’ve printed key pages from CH in case of a (((shutdown))).
LikeLike
Go read DT now. He’s in a bad place. I worry about us aging players.
LikeLike
Hmm. This conflicts with the notion that women know within five seconds if they’re gonna sleep with a guy they just met. They can only come to that conclusion based on superficial qualities like looks alone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maitre,
So you say there’s a chance!
LikeLike
Within five seconds, for women, it’s either “no” or “maybe”. Sure, a “maybe” can sometimes seem like a “yes”, but if a superficial alpha screws it up, it can still turn to “no”.
LikeLike
>>> ‘if a superficial alpha screws it up, it can still turn to “no”’
The Hamster is constantly probing for WEAKNESS.
If you memorize some artificial st0ne c0ld k!11a Gangsta Game line for your opener, and you’ve got her attention because of it, then you need to maintain that Frame for pretty much the entirety of your relationship with her, because the moment you even ponder the idea of letting down your guard, and reverting back to Mr Nice Guy Who Always Finishes Last, her Hamster will sniff that self-doubt in a microsecond, and teh Tinglezzzezzezes will vanish and teh V@g will go cold-n-dry and you will have already been Next’d [in her mind’s eye] long before she gets around to having that LJBF conversation with you.
LikeLike
I do not know if you are familiar with the story of that French Canadian cuck wannabe journalist jf garipy and latest developments on his podcast but what this animation guy did with it is hilarious
LikeLike
full animation you can find here
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CYoB0VRONeoY/
LikeLike
hehe “ate” speech what a clown
this so good that should be obligatory played as the last chapter of 1984
LikeLike
LikeLike
– Bulgarian Prime Minister: Close Europe’s Borders, Imprison Illegals, Deport Them Back to Africa –
https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/07/01/bulgarian-prime-minister-close-europes-borders-imprison-illegals-deport-africa/
LikeLike
– HISTORY MADE: MP Declares “I’m On My Period” In House Of Commons Debate On “Period Poverty” –
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=58635
LikeLike
“Cause she doesn’t get your humor like I do . . .” Taylor Swift gets it
LikeLiked by 2 people
perhaps you are not aware but there is a new best sellout at jew york times list
LikeLike
I’ll note that how her girlfriends act can provide useful info for understanding how her hamster is working.
Someone here once said, “If her friends like you a lot, she doesn’t want you. If her friends hate you, she wants you.”
Sort of… it’s more like, if she wants you, her friends keep a wide berth from you because their hamsters consider it a crime against nature for a hamster to be denied access to a Real Man. Professional courtesy, so to speak. So you’ll be more accepted by her (truly) platonic male friends and her female friends-of-friends. These friends and friends-of-friends will also be warning off other girls, which is of course much easier in a smaller town (as opposed to a womb graveyard like NYC), and is how girls actually entrap high-SMV men into m4rriage.
Whereas if her hamster has sniffed weakness in you and she’s gone totally cold on you, her friends will treat you like a gamma bestie. And, of course, you’ll have no problems meeting girls outside the group.
I’ve seen this phenomenon happen either way enough times, both in my AFC days, my Game-aware days, and to other dudes, to recognize the pattern.
LikeLiked by 1 person
>>> “their hamsters consider it a crime against nature for a hamster to be denied access to a Real Man”
Well those would have to be the true friends of hers, not the homewrecker fake friends which epochehusserl is linking to [up above here].
Also, I’m guessing that a chick is much moar likely to have true friends in a small town than in “a womb graveyard like NYC”.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Shitlib “the list of the most livable cities is out…4 German cities in the top 25…no US ones..so much for the migrant so called crises!’
‘How many African or Middle Eastern cities are on it?’
‘I wonder why Chicago is not on it?’
Silence
LikeLike
Fellas, ya gotta read this, so funny:
https://www.socialmatter.net/2018/07/02/express-heartfelt-apology-rolling-stone-journalist-amanda-robb/
LikeLiked by 2 people
that’s great
LikeLike
I dunno… even though (ahem) journalists these days get whatever they deserve… especially Rolling Stone journalists…
… and even though that bitchface phiz o’ hers merits a backhand…
… this is just some juvenile pranking that leaves a bad taste from an allegedly adult man.
But, that’s the South Park generation for ya.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s juvenile, yes, but so funny, which is kind of an end in itself. Truth, Beauty, and Humor. What’s funny about a really good troll is not just the troll himself, but the dimwit who falls for it. That she would go to those absurd lengths and not know he was fucking with her makes the joke better and better and better. With a prank, the mark typically has no way of knowing until it’s too late, but the trolled only has stupidity to blame.
I’m also of the opinion that our tastes in humor don’t change all that much with age.
LikeLike
I just realized that I just explained a joke, a cardinal humor sin. I should have JUST said BOFA DEEZ NUTZ
[CH: i loled for real when i saw the pic of the rolling stone whore wearing the maga hat. just…perfect.]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Men are the romantic sex. Women are incapable of feeling deep romantic love for a man and instead only love him for what he is able to provide to her. Women are only capable of feeling true love for their selves and their children.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Women are only capable of feeling true love for their selves and their children.”
If they’re too far over to the Dark Side of the bell curve for Passive Aggressive Personality Disorder, then they won’t even care about their own ch!ldren – in fact, any weaknesses in the boys will disgust them, and the worst of them will attempt to drive their weakling boys to su!cide.
LikeLiked by 1 person
poppycock. she will lay down her life for her alpha.
it is your duty to be that alpha.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Serious question. Husband has alpha attitude, passes fitness tests, is mission oriented, very fit and very handsome. Other women find him to be attractive. Couple are early 40’s with a boatload of kids. Why won’t the wife lose weight and take care of her body?
LikeLike
“a boatload of kids”
What moar can you ask for from a woman?
SRSLY.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[Assuming that none of them are products of cuckoldry…]
LikeLike
Now matter how “alpha” the man (look at all the divorces of movie stars and moguls), his wife has seen his highs and lows, and after enough years, he’s “just a man”.
And after a boatload of kids, well… in the words of the original self-dubbed “domestic goddess”: Roseanne Barr:
“Hey, if when he comes home at night and the kids are still alive, I’ve done MY job.”
You may find, too, that after a certain age… you did say “in their 40’s”… sex is not the compelling act we’re lead to believe to a vast majority of women… Eat’Pray/Love, Sex In The City kike propaganda notwithstanding.
And then, there’s them “marriage goggles”.
Of course, each man’s particular mileage may vary. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
General contentment after 20 plus years?
LikeLike
No one knows what goes on behind closed doors. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe the wife comes from a fat family. If she’s not as bad as any sisters she has, or her mom, that’s definitely the case.
LikeLike
Yes
LikeLike
I got this one- bc she doesn’t have to.
He’s not more alpha than her bodyguard, the DivorceRape comlex.
My prev gf was pretty solid but one of the things she wasn’t on was body weight. And I harped a few times but to no avail. Ultimately you gotta bail on em for it.
LikeLike
Girlfriend is easier to bail on than a wife with kids in the house.
LikeLike
Probably because he doesn’t act as though he has options.
LikeLike
Actually some “decent content” for a change…
Poetic and truthful based upon reality.
Well done Mr. CH who I dubbed “Cowardly Heathen” in the not-too-distant past.
Hmmm… O hmmm… looks like on the hunt for a “new name” for thee…
LikeLike
Captain Obvious- all the alpha dog’s children.
LikeLike
You take the weight gain with the children?
LikeLike
Dude.
The children are your RAISON D’ETRE.
If you wanna have a mistress a few houses down, with whom to start a second family [and eventually to bring into the fold as a s!ster w!fe], then have at it.
But you don’t abandon family.
LikeLiked by 4 people