• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Pantifa
MAKE SCOTUS SCROTUS AGAIN »

Comment Of The Week: Hamster Overload

July 9, 2018 by CH

From anonymous, our COTW winner (don’t you wish you had picked a handle now?):

For ages, people have asked “what do women want?”

The answer is simple.

Women want people and things that are pre-approved by their peers.

This becomes the torsion that wracks their very souls as socially, they are required to want things that are often diametrically the opposite of what they themselves want.

Sadly, the hamster will churn on, trying to weave a semblance of balance between the social needs and the internal wants.

This misalignment between social expectation and sexual appetite is stronger in women than in men; (it’s virtually nonexistent in men, because men from all classes and social strata prefer pretty young women over ugly older women).

We here at the Chateau have a term for it (courtesy of GBFM aka Q aka President Trump): alpha fux, beta bux. Women desire sexy charming jerkboys but also need dependable, reliable provider betaboys. Game is, succulently, a system of learned charisma that emphasizes jerkboy appeal (which most men lack) and merges it with beta provider cues of male mate fitness.

This shouldn’t be mistaken for the claim that women’s sexuality is always misaligned and that women are always having to choose between the alpha fux and the beta bux. Women often try to snag both male archetypes in the same package. The hottest of hotties will usually achieve the feat while the nottest of notties don’t even bother aiming for the alpha fux and will inevitably settle for a barely beta male or lonesome nights sifting smelly cat litter.

But, it is true that women as a sex experience a tension between social needs and crotchal wants that men rarely, if ever, experience at all, or with similar intensity. And in increasingly r-selected sexual markets that come to dominate declining cultures such as the current US, and which feature economically self-sufficient women, a shrinking pool of feminine slender beauties, and a retreat from the playing field by economically and culturally dispossessed men, this social need-sexual want tension in women is amplified to dangerous levels, resulting in misdirected conformism, hysteria, and eagerness to find purpose in cults, mass movements, and numinous negros.

Fewer beta bux AND fewer alpha fux that didn’t just disembark from the Dark Incontinent, coupled with delayed marriage and an enlarged window of nameless fornication fueled by birth control pills and wine by the bottle have driven our women right over the edge of sanity. Their rationalization hamsters are worked to near-death, spinning spinning until tufts of fur fly everywhere. The female wants are stoked to a fever in a charnel house of fly-by-night cock and chemically castrated womb, while the female needs are denied until a nervous breakdown or autistic IVF twins herald a lifetime of financial and psychological burden.

The hamster was never built for this sort of call to duty. The little guy spins a semblance of balance for a sexual market that didn’t outpace the speed of his wheel under his tiny legs. Now he runs as fast as he can but his legs give out as the wheel that manages communication between his vessel-woman’s fore- and hindbrain smokes and pops gears. The hamster no longer rides the wheel; the wheel rides him. The perfect metaphor of what our modren society does to women.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Comment Winners | 53 Comments

53 Responses

  1. on July 9, 2018 at 2:27 pm 14sonnenrad88

    Your best post yet.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on July 10, 2018 at 6:20 am toocrazy2yoo

      How much is enough? More!

      LikeLike


  2. on July 9, 2018 at 2:37 pm mendo

    It really is like that GIF where the hamster craps out and it getting taken for a ride by the very wheel said hamster revved up on its own.

    I keep sensing something’s got to give.

    LikeLike


  3. on July 9, 2018 at 2:39 pm Comment Of The Week: Hamster Overload | @the_arv

    […] Comment Of The Week: Hamster Overload […]

    LikeLike


  4. on July 9, 2018 at 2:40 pm Jonathan Castle

    “The hamster was never built for this sort of call to duty.”

    We underestimate the tenacity of the hamster.

    Really, it’s more honey badger than rodent.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  5. on July 9, 2018 at 2:42 pm Captain Obvious

    Anonymous: “Women want people and things that are pre-approved by their peers.”

    Smart women need to marry down to become mothers because there aren’t enough smart men to go around, researchers warn http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3669521/posts

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2018 at 2:47 pm Captain Obvious

      ^^^As I was saying to Carlos Danger earlier today, women are creatures of FASHION, and if the Frankfurt School can convince the herd [of cows] that credentialism is FASHIONABLE, then a fertile young credentialed shiksa will look down upon a masculine but un-credentialled shegetz man as being beneath the credentialed shiksa’s dignity.

      tl;dr == (((credentialism))) is designed to destroy White fert!lity rates.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on July 9, 2018 at 3:06 pm mendo

      I was at lunch today with some coworkers (all female) and one of them saw that byline on the news on TV.

      I wanted to say something smarmy or DJT-tier trolling but couldn’t think of anything to flip out the hamster further.

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2018 at 4:36 pm cynthia

      I hate the idea that “educated” equals “intelligent.” Some of the dumbest girls I know have graduate degrees. It’s a way of fooling yourself into thinking you’re super smart, but you’re not.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on July 9, 2018 at 5:07 pm Captain Obvious

        cynthia, suppose it’s not happening randomly.

        Suppose the idiot shiksas are being INTENTIONALLY LURED INTO higher edumakashun precisely so as to suppress their fertility rates.

        Suppose these trends are not happenstance.

        Suppose all of this was PLANNED.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2018 at 7:44 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

        There is a BIG difference between book smarts, life smarts/wisdom.

        LikeLike


  6. on July 9, 2018 at 2:58 pm R.G. Camara

    What do women want?

    Who cares?

    Tell them what they will want, and they will love you for it.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


  7. on July 9, 2018 at 3:07 pm XLoveli Deeper Seksi --> purpleboxx.wordpress.com

    I am not certain that the hamster exists (I realize this is heresy here).

    I think men’s attempts to enter women’s minds are hampered MASSIVELY by pre-existing bias. I am SURE Heartiste is wrong, fundamentally, about certain female motivations and thinking patterns, but I cannot easily put my finger on where. I would venture to say this, for example: I think men have a subconscious (divided) mind (courtesy of mom), but women DON’T. The “hamster” is essentially a micro-subconscious, in Heartiste’s terms, which I don’t believe women possess. They are “integrated” (though stupid in certain ways, also differently courtesy of mom) unlike men.

    You can see this in the way women talk, if you listen closely. There is a smoothness in women’s speech which conveys a lack of a brake (a subconscious, that would hamper them, but clearly doesn’t, so it isn’t there).

    In any case, if we use Hamster as a a metaphor for “generally torn,” then it may perhaps suffice.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2018 at 4:34 pm cynthia

      I see the hamster as that function we possess, unlike men, that allows us to avoid accepting responsibility for our mistakes.

      Think of it this way; it’s a delayed response to guilt. However, guilt serves a similar purpose to physical pain. It lets you know not to do something again, or that you are causing damage to your body. The hamster lets you push your feeling of guilt off, sometimes indefinitely. Unfortunately, this means that a lot of women don’t get the psychological feedback that would help them make better decisions in the future.

      LikeLiked by 2 people


      • on July 9, 2018 at 4:52 pm mendo

        That’s a solid analogy right there.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on July 9, 2018 at 4:58 pm Wild Man

      It’s called the rationalization hamster because it is about the power of the mind to rationalize (attempt to make sense of incoming info about the environment inclusive of the social environment, in terms of the paradigm or world-view already beholden by said mind). But here is the deal – women tend to ‘borrow’ the paradigm or worldview they are personally beholden to. With men (at least masculine men), the paradigm or world-view formation operation is much more of a competitive endeavor, and as such – a personalized endeavor.

      By way of one way of framing the description of ‘alpha’, the alpha man is the man that more women tend to want to borrow the paradigm or worldview on offer, by such a man, from, ….. and often the women can even get sorta a collective hysteria around that. Now the interesting thing is that the women do not have one clue about what goes into the making of said man’s paradigm or worldview, …. the women are really only going by social tells (this masculine paradigm or world-view formation operation is a competitive operation ….. and there are winners and there are losers, among the men, …. a dominance hierarchy around winning paradigm formations or world-view formations, and the women are good at picking the winners within this male dominance hierarchy, by way of subliminal tells bled out into the social environment by individual men, about subliminal opinions about themselves, about subliminal opinions each man harbors about each other man in the group, and also there are tells bled out into the social environment about male coalitions operating within said dominance hierarchies, that women are very adept at reading).

      OK – since a woman’s paradigm or worldview is more-so derivative than a man’s (at least a masculine man’s) …… the rationalization hamster operates in a different mode vis-a-vis a masculine man’s rationalization scripts. A masculine man will tend to get a subconscious tension arising (as you are pointing out in your comment), when a poor rationalization is harbored (one that, by subterfuge, obfuscates a concurrent calling into question the logic of his paradigm or worldview). A woman? – not so much. Their rationalization procedure is way more flexible (but then also – way more of low tensegrity, as well). Because the woman didn’t enter into the hard word of forming the paradigm or world-view in the first place (she simply borrowed it). As such, women can drop a paradigm and adopt a new one, and completely change her lifestyle, flexibility-wise, way easier than a masculine man can. All she needs to do is go with a different alpha man than the current one, and it is plain as day to see that she is flexible, and can change, almost like the wind, like that (at least women fortunate enough to hang with alpha men serially).

      Look – what one of the major themes that occurs here in the sphere is this loathing of this female whimsy as I have described here. But it is what it is. Nobody is gonna be able to change that (normative female nature). No need to loath it. Look – the most winning of alpha mindsets (alpha world-views or paradigms) are ones the incorporate these facts about female nature. Women love that shit (you know – the man that just seems to get it and all that). Such as man is truly an enigma to the women around him though. Many of said women don’t actually know that though. They often believe they see the alpha man clearly. That be a joke though. Enjoying these trivialities around female opinion are one of the sublime pleasures of possessing a masculine disposition.

      LikeLike


  8. on July 9, 2018 at 3:19 pm Jonathan Castle

    White women are currently trying to convince themselves that single motherhood is pre-approved by their peers.

    The furry-fury (hamster) must make this OK for the first generation of women that can’t stick the beta-bux landing.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2018 at 3:20 pm Xwarper @ purpleboxx.wordpress.com

      It makes you wonder who’s LEADING women, if it’s all a herd.

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2018 at 10:37 am trav777

        they’re a herd.

        Look at pop references to women’s behavior in all-female environments, like the Family Guy episode where the men and women were each together with amnesia trying to solve a crime without knowing anything. the men did it, the women at the end were just still fighting with one another as they had been since the start.

        Or there’s reality, like the all female America’s Cup team or that woman who famously hired only women for her startup business in the UK.

        Women are rudderless and they just squabble…THIS is their natural instinct and state of being. There is no check on that in the modern west because white knights have removed it.

        So really they just go where the winds blow and the jewtube sets the agenda for them. Men are reduced to impersonating females in the system because the system makes everyone play by female “rules” which are basically there are no rules, cheat and win.

        As a child, everyone can remember being with boys and we came up with exotic games with very precise rules that everyone agreed on after some argument. It was decided. Girls came to play and they fucking IGNORED EVERY RULE. They just wanted to kick the ball WHEEEEE or run across the plate WHEEEEEE or otherwise just “have fun.” They have no use for a social hierarchy, because they were always chattel who did what they were told.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


  9. on July 9, 2018 at 3:19 pm traitors first

    @CH and crew
    “or lonesome nights sifting smelly cat litter”
    if that’s the case check out the companies we may want to invest in and check out the blue pill soyboi cuckboi with problematic problem glasses in this commercial. It is to laugh and cringe all at the same time.

    https://www.ispot.tv/ad/dLn3/litter-robot-thanks-litter-robot

    LikeLike


  10. on July 9, 2018 at 3:23 pm traitors first

    @Captain Obvious and Carlos Danger
    OT but I thought one of you might find this interesting since I believe one of you said you’re either from the south or live in the south, don’t remember exactly.
    https://identitydixiedotcom/
    and for your reading pleasure
    http://www.davidrreynoldsdotorg/_articles/TheYankeeProbleminAmerica.pdf

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2018 at 9:38 pm Marc

      Clyde Wilson’s got the Yankee problem down.
      An old (former) paleocon like the Cap – if I recall correctly – will know all about Clyde and Tom Fleming and the rest.
      Damn but we could use Tom’s anger and learning but he just don’t get the race or jew thing

      LikeLike


  11. on July 9, 2018 at 4:03 pm Tam the Bam

    Women are not only brainless (Ritchie, SJ, 2018 et al https://academic.oup.com/cercor/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cercor/bhy109/4996558 -see diagrams), but also heartless. A truth universally acknowledged, until recently.

    Your hamster lives for 30 months [+/- 12]. He wasn’t meant to be flogged on mercilessly for 15-20 years till he dies in harness. Of Chardonnay and Tinder poisoning more than likely.

    So given the west-hajnalian trad. marriage-sans-contraception age of 18 (the “of full age” of the Victorian censi, but far, far older), one might expect to see the loyal old fellow put out to grass having fulfilled his destiny when madam is about 21, and knee-deep in diapers. N-n-n-nineteen for the southern papists, I suppose.

    Never mind the bloody jews, they’re just exasperating and silly grit in the gears, Harmless and easily evaded, as long as everyone knows what’s up.

    Birth-control, abortion and the Holy Welfare State. There stand your enemies, gentlemen. Form ranks!

    LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2018 at 11:12 am PBR Streetgang

      Entrenched Corporate spinsters are the enemy’s defense-in-depth … none of those abominations can be attacked until we reclaim our professions.

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2018 at 1:24 pm Tam the Bam

        Fine. I can do that. Gissa job!
        All HR offices to be only accessible via tower-crane type 100ft vertical ladder (16″ wide and strapped to the outside of the building) and a catwalk over the street to the opposite commieblock. Could add a rope swing, min. 20 ft. in the middle of the gangway, if I was feeling mean ..

        LikeLike


  12. on July 9, 2018 at 4:07 pm Doktor Jeep

    Autistic IVF twins…
    Let me tell you it’s almost a feature of Seattle to see these Subaru driving fat late 30s early 40s types huffing and puffing after their incoherent hands flapping little autist and no dad around to be seen. All the prozac and boxed wine can’t fully stave that despair.
    You can tell what the real issues are by what we can argue about and what no argument gains traction for. With autism and the cause of it, we are “allowed” to argue about whether or not it’s caused by vaccines. Is it? Well heavy metals pit into them certainly don’t help. But notice that the entire argument is handled in a manner that suggests most of the articles for and against the ideas are written in such a way that it tweaks both sides into a(n autistic) frothing rage. Oh and back and forth some ruling or study somewhere keeps throwing the argument a bone, or yanks it away. Almost on a rotation. As if to ensure there is never any conclusion.
    Meanwhile the incident rate of autism has gone up almost in parallel to the rate at which women wait to have kids but we’re not allowed to have that argument. If women started to learn that waiting too long has deleterious effects, why they might just get started earlier and end up cranking out two at 25 instead of one at 35 (and it will be one at 35 because pregnancy at that age after nearly 15 years on the pill results in a fatocalypse and nobody screwing her after that). Anything to keep the goy from reproducing at a replacement rate, if at all.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on July 10, 2018 at 10:41 am trav777

      nah they wouldn’t they would blame sexism or male privilege or the patriarchy for what nature did.

      Most women DO NOT KNOW that they have fertility problems looming past 27.

      I told an older chick that I had 20 year olds wanting to have my babies and she was like “kids having kids.” Scuse me wtf, on what planet is a 20yo a kid?

      When you let them ACT like kids they will do so, but gtfo here. It’s like the prevailing orthodoxy is that you SHOULD wait until your fucking fertility declines to have children…it’s so WTF that it makes your head spin.

      Women are intentionally waiting into the fat part of the birth defect fertility decline curve to attempt to have kids.

      It’s like a man deciding I wanna be a pro athlete at 50.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


  13. on July 9, 2018 at 4:24 pm cynthia

    “This becomes the torsion that wracks their very souls as socially, they are required to want things that are often diametrically the opposite of what they themselves want.”

    I’d argue with this slightly. Us women have a weird ability to not feel guilt, pain, or confusion over things they deny themselves (or embrace) because of social pressure. We don’t feel this stuff, at least, not until there are hard consequences. Once those hit, then there’s no fixing it; it will haunt you forever.

    This is why some women will cheerfully declare they felt no guilt over their abortion. They genuinely don’t feel guilt. They don’t feel like they want the baby. They don’t think they’ve done anything wrong. They’ve been told abortion is a good thing, and thus, it must be a good thing. It takes some women decades to realize what they’ve done, and once that happens, it is absolutely crippling.

    Our ability to ignore things that would be psychologically painful to men is both a gift and a curse. It’s not inherently a bad thing. Feminism has weaponized it, though; by making so many untrue things into a social movement, they force us all to uphold the lie or risk permanent emotional distress. A lot of women are literally unaware of what they’re doing.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on July 9, 2018 at 4:35 pm Captain Obvious

      c, you’re getting damned close to declaring that all members of your sex are outright psychopaths.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on July 9, 2018 at 5:36 pm Wild Man

        No CO – psychos would never be capable of that perspective reconciliation, however far into the future it may occur.

        I think what Cynthia is saying is that there are not enough alpha men around now, for women to willingly submit to, paradigm-wise or worldview-wise.

        The new social order has played interference among us all – women and men alike. I know I’m sounding repetitive saying it but yet again – …… the semitic worldview is in no way superior to the western worldview. As such the semitic worldview must be spurned, first, so as pave the way for it’s being brought to heel, to serve western interests, instead of the other way around as is now occurring (as such, the minor value inherent in the semitic worldview – which really is akin to a tremendous narcissism, can be put to proper use – jews do have their place in our culture – but as leaders of anything? – no – those predisposed towards the semitic mindset suck leadership-wise – no ….. the forte of the semitic mindset is it’s propensity towards asking a myriad of layered questions….. and therefore a propensity for going deep – but, as is the nature of this mindset – this leads to a mind full of byzantine artifice – if not tempered by the power inherent in the western mind to cut through crap).

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2018 at 5:48 pm Jay in DC

      This right here, from the horse’s mouth, is absolute truth. There seems to be an odd thing that happens here and a few others above you have pointed it out where we do what we accuse women of doing. Which is seeing the opposite sex as what we ourselves may be like.

      Women are largely amoral sociopaths in their current incarnation. I had an ‘oops’ with a foreign stunner who I would have been happy to work it out with and wife up. She wasn’t tryin’ to hear it and vacuumed herself out post haste. I was really in a dilemma over it, for her it was like having a mole removed.

      Times that scenario by just about every decision they make on a daily basis, even life altering ones, and you’d have a better window into what you are dealing with. It wasn’t always this way because what we DO get right is that women are massive herd animals. They take their cues from the zeitgeist of social acceptance.

      Since we inhabit the diseased clown world, well… you get it.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2018 at 5:59 pm Wild Man

        “Women are largely amoral sociopaths in their current incarnation.”

        ‘Current incarnation’ as shaped by what? That’s the key question. And it is my contention that the agent of that shaping, has shaped western man as well. Not just the women. There is a lack of alpha men. The competition around alpha worldview has been fixed. The fix has been in for a long while now around that. We (men and women alike) are being screwed over. By our lessers to boot. It’s pathetic.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2018 at 11:20 am trav777

        Flesh out your point better-

        women aren’t men. Morality as defined is a male construct. We expect it (foolishly) to be universal. It’s not, it’s so far from it as to be amazing sometimes.

        I learnt all I needed to ever know about this aspect of women in 5th grade, when I moved to a new school and we played Foursquare on the playground. I was really good at it, and i frequently earned my way to the server’s square. And I stayed there for the better part of recess almost every time. Until and unless someone, sometimes a girl (!) put me out and i went back in line. I followed the rules of the game and excelled at it.

        Till one day some female teacher came over and pulled me out and said “this isn’t fair, you need to give other people the opportunity to be server.” Because some girl (you know it wasn’t a boy, that’s shameful) whined to her that it just wasn’t FAIR for me to be “getting to be server” all recess. Gimme gimme gimme. And i objected, and this teacher took the ball out of my hands and banned me from the game indefinitely.

        THAT is their concept of “fairness”; it has nothing tf whatsoever to do with ours where you have a system and rules and those who play within them and succeed- THIS IS FAIR to a man. To a woman it’s not. It’s as unfair as can be because they don’t get to do something they want to do. And rather than deny some girl the stupid sugar high of getting to serve once weeeee I did it, women destroy the entire game and any reason to play it or ever get good. Girls who earned the fourth square on their own had ACTUAL self-esteem because they beat that guy, they overcame and they took the top spot. But no we can’t hear that shit because equalism is a female cult concept that they will enforce by brutal fiat if given the chance. Women polled would rather have their friends be made fat than go through the effort themselves to be thin.

        There’s no guilt in this, there is only what do I WANT. What do I FEEL. This isn’t self-reflective and it’s never going to be. It is what it is.

        Is this sociopathic? Well if it were a man, it sure af would be. But it’s not. Women *do* feel guilt and they feel it in some cases where it becomes paralyzing and overwhelming. I’ve seen it. If they think they “hurt your feelings,” this is when it’s strongest. And if you want to manipulate their responses, you display false emotion (they will sniff it out due to empathy if you cannot fabricate the affect), rather than argue about how “wrong” or “unjust” their actions were. Make them FEEL bad as a result of your FEELING bad and they will respond, sometimes out of anger though because you’re making them feel badly (lol) or YOU are making them “feel guilty.” I’ve fucked around with this in the past and it’s an eye opener…NLP and false affect. They will almost crawl on broken glass to get you to relieve them of it.

        Women will almost always choose immediate emotional gratification without respect to long-term consequences. This is how herd propaganda and psych techniques work so well on them, THIS is how i get into their pants on long haul flights, Jay. In the case of abortion, they are dodging fear, responsibility, even terror of the baby…these are real emotions they have as a result of pregnancy.

        Pregnancy is like dread game on steroids, the fear motivates. The clinic is just a tongue bite and uber ride away and the dread is gone…it’s too emotionally rewarding to pass up.

        Never underestimate the power of emotion on women; surely many of us have had a girl around long enough who went on and off birth control and have seen them become LITERALLY different people due to the influence of the hormones- it’s quite profound.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on July 10, 2018 at 11:28 am Captain Obvious

        JnDC, back in muh Paleo-Cuck days, I got into an yuge dust-up with a graduate student in philosophy, when I mentioned something about women being fundamentally amoral creatures [to the extent that morality does not seem to be innate to women, but rather needs to be taught to them].

        Apparently it upset his w!fe so much that he was ready to k!ll me.

        I learned a lot that night, in terms of pattern analysis concerning psychological procilivities [even though, at the time, being a cuck, it would be years before I began to understand what I had learned].

        That particular dude [who is now a philosophy professor] had claimed to be something of an old school leftist, with a very masculine blue collar Ernest Hemingway kinduvan approach to things.

        In retrospect, though, I guess that I [the Paleo-Cuck] was actually the Sh!tlord in the making, and Mr Working Class Hero was the go-along-to-get-along cuck of the Frankfurt School [given that the Frankurt School has now switched gears and no longer pretends to support the White working class anymore].

        And it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if Mr Working Class Hero has now moved on to championing the rights of the muds & the trannies & the phags.

        LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2018 at 6:48 am Roy

      The essay War Brides, by Rollo Tomassi explains it all very well. It’s an evolutionary adaptation — the hamster as we affectionately call it here.

      LikeLike


  14. on July 9, 2018 at 4:41 pm kapy53

    I hate going out in public anymore because all the fat women hit on me endlessly. I’d honestly be flattered if they were just 20 lbs lighter. Why must Beta women all be fat? I’m not settling for a current or future hamplanet.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on July 9, 2018 at 5:30 pm Tam the Bam

      At this point, any supreme gentleman would do the decent thing, and show them (show and tell) that you are most charmed by their quite lubricious and abundant enticements but must for duty, and the nation’s sake, most regretfully decline. Any man in one’s position naturally has .. options.

      Tell them to fuck off out of it quicksmart, you’re busy with totty here (have suitable and slenderish squeeze to hand, of course).

      LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2018 at 11:23 am trav777

      do you tell them to lose 20 then call you? Maybe you should

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2018 at 11:32 am kapy53

        I really should. I always tell myself I just don’t want to deal with the resulting shitstorm from saying something like that.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on July 10, 2018 at 1:46 pm Tam the Bam

        So what you’re saying is .. these lobsters are literally bullying and shaming you into bed? That’s what sexual terrorists call .. Rape.
        Raaaaaaayyyyyype! Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyype!!

        Get a makeup artist to fake some funky skin lesions in non-obvious locations. Act real keen, and then flash the “pox”/niggerAIDS/leprosy/psoriasis/Black Plague, while innocently saying” Ethically, I really have to disclose ..”
        Those stomach-churning battletoads are a-huntin’ for the ApexAlphaChadMcSpraybucks they know they truly deserve, not some crippled drunken loser.
        Like me.

        LikeLike


  15. on July 9, 2018 at 4:52 pm Anonymous

    Thoroughly enjoyable post, would be better with mentions of hambeasts- love that word.

    LikeLike


  16. on July 9, 2018 at 5:28 pm gamegetterII

    Reblogged this on Starvin Larry.

    LikeLike


  17. on July 10, 2018 at 12:40 am Mean Mr. Mustard

    I thought this was worth sharing.

    Robert Greene (of The 48 Laws of Power, fame) has a new book due out in October this year … The Laws of Human Nature.

    “To navigate the social environment and be better with people, we should understand what those components of human nature are.

    According to Greene, the Seven Deadly Realities of Human Nature are:

    1) Envy. We have natural tendencies to compare ourselves to others, whether it’s with regards to how much money we make, how popular we are, how smart we are, and a number of other things that I’m sure you might be able to come up.

    2) Conformism. Organized groups of any kind generally develop a certain dominant cultural mindset, complete with unwritten standards of correctness, that, of course, may shift with the times. Often times members will, perhaps subconsciously, adopt the views and ideals of the person heading the organization.

    3) Rigidity. Humans are generally creatures of habit and routine, which is what we look for in order to maintain some semblance, however artificial, of control. People hold on to these norms, simply because they’ve become accustomed to them, even if a new way, a better way, has been proven. It’s human nature, especially as we age, to want to adhere to these customs and resist new ways of thinking or doing things.

    4) Self-obsessiveness. It is human nature, especially in today’s work environments to think first and foremost of ourselves and our own self-interests. Since it isn’t a very noble trait to display, most folks, especially the most self-absorbed will surround their actions with a veil of moral or saintly righteousness.

    5) Laziness. Most people want to take the quickest, easiest path of least resistance in order to reach our goals. This is truer than ever, especially in today’s day and age of instant gratification, and instant feedback. Most lazy folks are always looking for shortcuts, and the most insidious will try to attain those shortcuts by any means possible, even if it means by theft, dishonesty or another form of cheating.

    6) Flightiness. Most people’s decisions are largely governed by our emotions, even though most would not like to admit it. Since this is the case most decisions can change by the day, hour or minute depending on the mood we’re in.

    7) Passive Aggression. Most passive aggression stems from the fear or unpleasantry associated with direct confrontation, which generally implies the possible loss of control. Passive aggressive tactics involve indirect means for people to get their way, which is usually subtle,hard to detect, and a subversive way to control the dynamic.

    LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2018 at 11:42 am Captain Obvious

      MMM, that dude is going way too soft on the Passive Aggressives.

      Passive Aggressive Personality Disorder is some seriously evil shiznat.

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2018 at 7:29 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

        Any female-dominated work or social environment is rife with passive-aggressive behaviour.
        Especially when it comes to jockeying for attention, status, resources or perceived benefits.
        When passive-aggressive behaviour doesn’t work, they will typically start playing the victim or turn to shaming tactics.
        A minority of them will turn aggressive or use that as a last resort.

        LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2018 at 1:53 pm Tam the Bam

      Lazy. By God am I lazy. Born that way, and have now raised it to an art movement (postcards available at a discount. Don’t hold your breath).

      Smartest man I ever met said (me moaning on about my hideously lazy sons)
      “No, fuck that. I just love me a “lazy” programmer. Hire them CV unseen, if they can talk the talk, to me”

      LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2018 at 1:57 pm everybodyhatesscott

      Where have I seen those before?

      Gluttony – Rigidity and conformism
      Greed – Self Obsessiveness
      Sloth – Laziness
      Wrath – Flightiness
      Envy – Same
      Pride – Passive aggression
      Lust – Ok, this one doesn’t track

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2018 at 7:29 pm Mean Mr. Mustard

        There is nothing new under the Sun.
        Everything has been said and done.
        What we have now is new packaging.

        LikeLike


  18. on July 10, 2018 at 6:23 am toocrazy2yoo

    As long as women make concrete decisions with far-reaching consequences based on day-to-day changes in the shifting sands of their feeeelings, all results are random. Therefore, they’re of no consequence. Maybe men could get used to telling women to shut UP again. The trouble started when we had to start listening to them.

    LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2018 at 11:25 am trav777

      Bingo.

      Except they are of consequence now primarily because we have to listen to them or the System will destroy us

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on July 10, 2018 at 2:05 pm toocrazy2yoo

        I was talking about wives. You’re talking a professional sense. The ‘system” may destroy you maybe. Not me. If the ‘system” can destroy you for the morose ravings of a chick, you’re in the wrong business and not enough in demand. If the ‘system’ needs you, they find a way of forgiving the little things–and a lot of big ones, too.

        LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2018 at 2:08 pm Tam the Bam

      Outmoded, your old universal franchise Democracy lark. These days, women vote all the time, hundreds of times a week, on Everything. And expect to be obeyed, never mind Taken Seriously.

      It’s called Facebook/Twitter/fucking Mumsnet/radio phone-ins/TripAdvisor/reviews on Air B’n’B/restaurant reviews/whining on Amazon … on and on and on …

      Counts for far more with our obsessively (((treacherous))) elected representatives than your piffling individual ballot.
      It’s the Current Year, get with the program.

      LikeLike


  19. on July 11, 2018 at 2:31 am Borat Sagdijev

    What do women want?

    Kids. And everything that enables this, of course.

    But since we had a global population explosion and even in Africa the child mortality got nearly as low as in the developed world, their wish and main occupation throughout human history is ostracized.

    What women say is irrelevant, look at what they do and especially at what they have done.

    So all futile and stupid things women do these days in the developed world are still aimed at that.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Canadian Friend on Sweden, The Cuck Corner Stool…
    Hugh Jenniks on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Canadian Friend on Deep State Update: Keeping It…
    Corinth Arkadin on Oy, There It Is
    Corinth Arkadin on Oy, There It Is
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
    • Deep State Update: Keeping It In The Family For A Reason
    • This Is What Separate Dating Markets Are For (Or: White Vs Black Thirst)
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: