Listen for the *preen* cue starting around 4:40…
-
Pages
Twitter Updates
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Recent Comments
Canadian Friend on Sweden, The Cuck Corner Stool… Hugh Jenniks on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… Canadian Friend on Deep State Update: Keeping It… Corinth Arkadin on Oy, There It Is Corinth Arkadin on Oy, There It Is Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… Top Posts
- Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
- Red Tsunami?
- Oy, There It Is
- Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
- Shitlib Logic Trap!
- Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
- There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
- Deep State Update: Keeping It In The Family For A Reason
- This Is What Separate Dating Markets Are For (Or: White Vs Black Thirst)
- The NPC Song: "Feel"
Categories
Nice
LikeLike
Sweet!
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] F. Roger Devlin On The Woman Question […]
LikeLike
Devlin’s book “Sexual Utopia in Power” is mandatory reading.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Beat me to it. Pairs well with “The Manipulated Man” by (((Esther Vilar)))
LikeLike
Da gbfm was a big fan of F. Roger Devlin. I miss his insight.
Too bad he’s busy running the country and doesn’t comment here anymore.
LikeLike
Good work CH.
LikeLike
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v6n2/DevlinTOQV6N2.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8iPKBrqncAhUs5IMKHWP8DAcQ5OUBMAd6BAgHEAE&usg=AOvVaw2dn1Q9PejSdMtyCJUz1wjE
Theres the pdf.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This post will not garner the most fanfare, but it’s all about why I respect the proprietor. The great thing about game is that it only works for minds of intellectual integrity. Ragnar Danneskjöld set down his pen. Opportunity costs. Mass marketing is never progressive. I don’t know what more you can accomplish as a blogger. Maybe you should devote more time to being a mentor? Or poolside? You must have your reasons. I heard intelligent men today, by a recording. There is isolated decency in the world. The locusts show me their ugly faces and minds every time I look or listen beyond my room. It’s all quite maddening. Libtards to the left of me, cuckservies to the right.
LikeLiked by 3 people
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Wow, red pills galore
LikeLike
“The system of monogamy serves not to restrict sex for men, but to get sex for as many men as possible.”
I found this line to be a real eye opener and something I had never considered.
LikeLike
Interesting talk.
“When sex is liberated from marriage”… you get women “mating with the most attractive men available.” We get a “traffic jam at the top of the sexual hierarchy.”
We all know this.
We also know (or I do) that married men don’t actual fuck their wives often, if at all. So it’s not really about SEX, but about “PARTNERS.” It’s not about “mating,” it’s about “having a mate.”
I fully agree that marriage is good for civilization, but not because those “lower men” get sex. They don’t. Married people rarely fuck.
This is about ENVY and perceived social status. A man that can’t get a “mate” (even one that won’t fuck him, or he doesn’t want to fuck), has a lower social status than a man that can… and it’s OBVIOUS, it’s true “out in the public square.” People can see a “mate” even if they can’t see “mating.” And being “obviously lower” in status injures the pride of those men… and those men are then less than ideal for a stable civilization (and the cooperation required for stability).
LikeLike
“The people that have embraced feminism and the sexual revolution, will fail to reproduce. And the people… that have children/families will become the parents of the future generation. Over time, the problem will solve itself.”
— F. Roger Devlin
On a related topic, this is one of the best reads I’ve come across in a long time:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/20/the-return-of-patriarchy/
“The emergence of a new society whose members will disproportionately be descended from parents who rejected the social tendencies that once made childlessness and small families the norm.”
— Longman
LikeLike