A Gabber prompts the title of this post with the following thought experiment,
It is also more important to control women’s sexuality than men’s sexuality.
Hypothetical;
A tribe of 100 men and 100 women.
You control the sexuality of 99 men and 1 woman? You get 99 single mothers.
You control the sexuality of 1 man and and 99 women? You get 1 single mother.
A perfectly illustrative hypothetical. About the only edit I would make is to account for female hypergamy: in the second scenario, the one unconstrained woman would choose the apex alpha (if her appearance was sufficiently arousing to allow her the choice) and ignore the remaining 98 men granted freedom of sexuality. You’d still get a single mom, though, because that apex alpha would be set upon by the 98 blue-balled betas who would kill him (if they didn’t also kill her infant in the way usurping lions are wont to do).
This is why White Knights are so fucking stupid to attempt their pedestal polishing within the context of a society that has removed all constraints on female sexuality (while retaining shame-based restrictions on male sexuality). These goobers practiced in the brute art of thot enabling are unwittingly abetting and exacerbating social dysfunction and atomized sexual market transactionalism.
It’s not a coincidence that the single mommery rate rose to heights previously unimagined in America at the same time the abolishment of social controls on women released free ranging vagina on the land.
It’s unturtling gashes all the way down.