Welcome to the CH patented, leather-bound B.O.B. seduction system.
Birth order has an impact on a girl’s character. How much of an impact is debatable, but the zero sum sexual market is all about exploiting pattern perturbations at the margins. In my travels through the Valley of the Thots, I’ve noticed that only-children, first-borns, middle chicks, and “woopsie” last-borns share personality, and hence sexuality, traits.
Only-children girls:
The stereotypes are true. Only-daughters have been coddled their whole lives. They have never had to compete for love and attention with siblings, and their parents (probably sad they didn’t have a son, given they stopped at one kid) treat them with kid gloves because they don’t want the onlies to be upset with them. Sometimes the fathers will resent their only-girls, or push them to be tomboys against their natures, and this will later fuel a slutty rebelliousness in the only-girl that materializes as Dad’s worst nightmare. These girls grow up to be your typical “precious princesses”; selfish, egotistic, demanding, irrationally confident…and DTF. Yes, onlies love to jump in the sack with men who can overpower their solipsism and associated shit tests. The catch is that onlies make such an overpowering first impression that most men are intimidated by their lookatme antics.
First-born girls:
The weight of expectation is placed on these girls. They have carried the burden of pleasing their parents and undertaking some responsibility for their younger siblings. These are your straight-arrow, apple polisher chicks with a good head on their shoulders. They know what they want in a man, and it’s usually a long-term commitment. First-borns respond well to “shared values” and “life dreams (or lost dreams)” Game routines, because they have spent their lives trying to please others often at the expense of pleasing themselves. You want to be the man who can connect with the first-born on the level of someone who gets what she’s had to sacrifice, and who can give her what she’s allowed herself to miss out on before she met you.
Middle chicks:
Keep in mind that White American family size is decreasing, so middle- and last-born chicks are a vanishing breed. Still, I’ve known a few, and they have their own way of seeing the world. Middles are usually artsy, free spirits, and this predilection extends to their poon. They have big, soft hearts, easily broken, that soar and sway and get carried away on bouts of self-induced drama. These were the girls largely ignored by their parents, left to explore on their own. And explore they do, every nook and cocka. Be the man who notices her “special talents” and she’ll be yours forever.
Woopsies (last-borns):
“Mistakes” are pampered even more than are only-children, especially if they’re girls. These are the “rare jewel” daughters of fathers who shower them with baubles, credit cards, BMWs for their Sweet Sixteen birthdays, and a hands-off approach to disciplining them. Part of the reason is that parents get lazy by the third kid, opting to let nature take its course. Another reason is that parents, feeling guilty about neglecting to properly raise the Woopsie, alleviate their guilt by giving the Woopsie lots of gifts and leeway to do as she pleases. The woopsie girl can do no wrong, and because she has never had boundaries on her behavior, she grows up into a thrill-seeker who will push men’s boundaries just to see how much she can get away with before the hammer comes down (it rarely does…most men are pussies). The Woopsie is liable to shack up with a jerkboy grifter before she ever has a serious relationship with a serious man. She’s prone to cheating, carousing, gallivanting, acting out, and then regretting her decisions when the Wall looms. Men looking for the Woopsie Bang should stress script-flipping; the Woopsie can’t resist a hard-to-get man after a lifetime having her feelings validated and her every want fulfilled by her Pedestal Polishing Dad.
***
“traitors first” connects the dots,
So essentially go for onlies and woopsies for the easy lay and first and middles for LTR or waifu.
Wow that really does explain why the female market is so screwed up, you’re picking from 70% + onlies and woopsies (probably closer to 90% now a days) leaving less than 30% (way less) as potential wife material and probably half of that left over is probably a lost cause.
There is much truth in this.
Small family size = More dirty sluts?
mmmmmm….could be!

An associated phenomenon is the infantile Jon Benet versus the Ugly Duckling.
I knew a pair of sisters where the older one was gorgeous as a pre-pubescent [at least in the family pics which were shown to me], but adolescence was rather unkind to her, and her face was just a little “off” by the time she graduated from college [her schnoz in particular came to dominate her face].
Whereas her kid sister was an Ugly Duckling who blossomed into something akin to a friggin Super Model.
But here’s the kicker: The older one [who had been groomed to be a Jon Benet] had this kinda weird b!tchy streak to her [as though she were still the life of the party], whereas Ugly Duckling Super Model was a total sweetheart [personality-wise] who didn’t seem to realize quite how stunning she was.
LikeLiked by 3 people
@Captain Obvious
Exactly, the biggest problem with females now a days is that they have their @$$ kissed from day one and depending on how they look it never stops.
Well until men like the EGK come along, MAGA MEN GAME gentlemen of the chateau, FTW.
LikeLike
5-6 years ago I was a a friends kids birthday party. There was an, I’m guessing here, 11 year old “model” who was just a straight up cunt. A cunt, at 11.
Don’t spoil your kids.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Even back in the day, I remember a few cunts-in-training among the preteen cliques at social gatherings, especially when in groups of three and four… not respecting adult males and saying things obviously heard at home from their cunt moms.
I guess my point is, this issue of cuntitude has always been with us… the only difference is, it wasn’t the norm, nor celebrated, until relatively recently.
LikeLiked by 1 person
first born second born fourth born whatever THEY ALL JUST BITCHEZ TO ME
LikeLiked by 2 people
So essentially go for onlies and woopsies for the easy lay and first and middles for LTR or waifu.
Wow that really does explain why the female market is so screwed up, you’re picking from 70% + onlies and woopsies (probably closer to 90% now a days) leaving less than 30% (way less) as potential wife material and probably half of that left over is probably a lost cause.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Middle kids classically don’t get much single-focus attention (always sharing with siblings). They are more likely to leave their city of birth, and/or travel more (as no one is that focused on them at home, either way).
They might skew more low self esteem, but are more compliant in my experience.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You forgot the adopted African orphan. She can be recognized by being DTF for a bag of beans.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I think black women in general are like that.
LikeLike
You kinda have them at hello
LikeLike
Either that or SHOW THEM THE MONEY!
LikeLike
You mean… they’re wh0res? Say it ain’t so!
LikeLike
At $5 they have extremely high standards.
LikeLike
A new opener that fits my blunt style, “You an only child?”
LikeLike
You are a virgin
LikeLike
That’d be nice. I’d have way more drive to approach. What’s been your secret to keeping it all these years?
LikeLike
[…] Birth Order Banging […]
LikeLiked by 1 person
I imagine the worst-case scenario is a Woopsie with only older brothers, making her an only daughter. If your Game isn’t ironclad in triplicate, don’t bother.
LikeLike
Yeah, there are different multipliers and slight changes in behavior for the number and gender of siblings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
older brothers can be a really good thing as long as they keep her in line, tease her relentlessly, etc. they are only a problem if they coddle and spoil her usually because the cuck dad does it too or there is no dad in the perfect and mom is a man hater
in my experience, girls with no brothers or dad, only mom and sisters are the worst. probably because it’s usually a feminist mom who raises her girls to hate men and to think girls can do no wrong
LikeLiked by 2 people
*no dad in the picture
LikeLike
>> older brothers can be a really good thing as long as they keep her in line, tease her relentlessly, etc.
Agree.
I’m oldest, with younger sisters. My best connections are typically younger sisters. They already know how to deal with boys, they get boys culture, they know how to banter/tease, less princess behavior, etc.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know this post (and site) is mostly about “banging”, but the absolute worst, the nadir of the “nuclear” family, is a boy raised in a heavily or totally female household, like every ghetto wastoid you’ll ever have the misfortune to meet. I believe it might by the environmental foundation for sociopathy, the nurturing genesis of Dindu Nuffins.
LikeLiked by 3 people
My wife is a first-born (of four total), and I can attest that what is written here rings true.
LikeLike
Ditto… all her other siblings were brothers, to boot… AND she came from a church-going background, so even though her and her brothers never were hyper-Christian themselves, they at least respected the Lord and feared to do wrong.
And when you fear to do wrong, you need fear nuthin’ else. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
My second sister is a middle kid. Yup, she’s the bubbly one of us and if not for her rock-solid faith and strong upbringing, she would have carouseled like crazy.
This was confirmed by my mother, no less!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The 3 daughters in ‘Sense & Sensibilities’ follow this pattern. First- born sensible, responsible. Middle girl, artsy, free spirit. Last girl, while not yet grown up, was adventurous, tomboyish, non-disciplined.
LikeLike
That’s Austin’s leitmotiv in much of her work… she, the queen of Hypergamy.
LikeLike
“Only-daughters have been coddled their whole lives. They have never had to compete for love and attention with siblings, and their parents (probably sad they didn’t have a son, given they stopped at one kid) treat them with kid gloves because they don’t want the onlies to be upset with them.
These girls grow up to be your typical “precious princesses”; selfish, egotistic, demanding, irrationally confident”
This portion of the “only child daughter” is really on the money. My second ex-wife to a T. Her dad adored her, emotionally spoiled her, and this, I believe, led her to conclude that she was indeed the center of the universe. Solipsistic in the extreme. I may have been the first man ever to tell her NO and stick with it, which is probably what attracted her to me. She still bristled at not getting her way all the damned time, and I’m sure still does to this day.
I have observed only-sons, on the other hand, to be reasonably well-adjusted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My oldest son was dating an only child girl at the time, back in high school and college.
She was of immaculate genetic material, a dog person, and not totally spoiled…
But her mom was a straight up go-grrl cunt, a widow but I’m pretty sure would have been a divorcee if the old man hadn’t croaked (“he ain’t dead, lady… he’s hiding!).
I warned him that, in the marriage scenario, if it came to that, he would always be #4, behind the kids, her mom, and the dogs.
It didn’t come to that… but I do rue how beautiful and intelligent their children might have been.
LikeLiked by 2 people
>>>>> “My oldest son was dating an only child girl at the time, back in high school and college.”
Je$us T!tty Phucking Chr!st, what are you, like 90 years old?
LikeLiked by 2 people
WTF, Cap’n? Wanna explain THAT logic to me?
Or are you so starved for likes that you’ll replay snarkily to ANY Eliot post?
LikeLike
“I have observed only-sons, on the other hand, to be reasonably well-adjusted.”
They’re an either-or case. Sometimes they figure they need to represent their family’s next generation because no one else will, and so are more responsible — but sometimes they get spoiled and end up total wastes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and yet, at least one prominent online dating service only matches you to screw based on matching birth order not that male first borns may like woopsies or whatever.
In my own useless Not All Woopsies Are Like That counter-example…if the parents are, shall we say religious, then the woopsie is more of a pampered princess but a good girl, almost an eternal child. I mean, they still fuck but I haven’t seen similar behaviors as listed.
LikeLike
>>>>> “one prominent online dating service only matches you to screw based on matching birth order”
It just means that you need that many moar Burner Phones so that you can sign up a unique profile for each of the possible birth ord3rs.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
I have three sisters, one is the oldest, one is a middle, and one is the youngest. Spot on descriptions.
LikeLike
A bit too generalising, might be true for the first born but I have found the last born to be easy going and not demanding, life always smiled at them and they usually smile back at the world, they are like a pretty woman even if they are not that pretty. The middle ones are the most volatile.
LikeLike
Have to agree. My experience is the lastlies are more the free spirits, while the middle daughters tend towards the bitter, resentful of the first-born’s “perfect daughter” routine and jealous of the freedom and endless leeway afforded the youngling.
LikeLike
Marsha, Marsha, Marsha! It’s always about Marsha!
LikeLike
There is such a thing as overthink, and I think this enters that danger zone. It is an aspect of Game that has nothing to do with Game really but rather Common Sense, life itself. Just being alive and relating, on some basic and easy ways, to whomever is in front of you. This is the entire point of basic social skills.
These categories should change zilch about your own approach to the girl. All of them want a charming, strong man who can see at least one or two of her struggles and weaknesses. Just be that, lightly and not in some hardcore, try-hard manner, and communicate that you’re out to help people in the world, and no matter what her birth order, she’ll want more. All the details? You’ll learn those AFTER she’s become attracted to you. She’ll impute all her dreams and life solutions on you without you having to even try.
For men like me with a long history of over-analyzing and over-thinking, rather than just living and running on instinct and basic dignity and human interaction, this kind of article is not helpful at all. It has ruined quite a few of my interactions and potentially great relationships. The details aren’t all that important. She’ll decide that, you just be Man.
LikeLike