And we have our iGadgets, so kwitchyerbitchin. /neoliberal /libertardian
-
Pages
Twitter Updates
Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.
Recent Comments
Canadian Friend on Sweden, The Cuck Corner Stool… Hugh Jenniks on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… Canadian Friend on Deep State Update: Keeping It… Corinth Arkadin on Oy, There It Is Corinth Arkadin on Oy, There It Is Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci… Top Posts
- Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
- Red Tsunami?
- Oy, There It Is
- Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
- Shitlib Logic Trap!
- Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
- There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
- Deep State Update: Keeping It In The Family For A Reason
- This Is What Separate Dating Markets Are For (Or: White Vs Black Thirst)
- The NPC Song: "Feel"
Categories
LikeLike
Time for British enrichment on these orcs while this song blares through an amplifier.
LikeLiked by 2 people
from London calling to London falling there is less than 40 years
“come out of cupboard you (white) boys and girls”
have been there recently
have not seen many white boys and girls
LikeLiked by 1 person
(((Joe Strummer))) (((Mick Jones)))
LikeLike
Joe Strummer was only about 10% ((( ))).
LikeLike
Wrong song. White Riot was their response to the Notting Hill Festival.
LikeLike
With all due respect, that’s a huge straw man about libertarianism. All we say is that tradition, morals, and social pressure are a more appropriate mechanism for running a civilized society than laws imposed by a (possibly foreign) self-anointed elite. We are not libertines, even if we think more laws might not be the appropriate method to stop the moral rot. I don’t know what kind of libertarians you’ve met…
LikeLiked by 3 people
But to have the traditions, morals and social pressure necessary to enforce society’s rules, you need a govt that preserves ethnic homogeneity.
LikeLiked by 2 people
another LOLberterian lolz
jeez you do not even notice that you have become a huge joke
while atomized individuals desperately longing for broken bondage you are calling for further deconstruction of elementary particles
your religion of the holy individual is as leftoid as it possibly could be
LikeLiked by 1 person
We wouldn’t expect a non-NW Euro like yourself to comprehend something like freedom.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free”
― Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe, Elective Affinities
LikeLiked by 2 people
libertarianism fails because too many people don’t have the morals, traditions or scruples to care about said social pressure. especially all the foreigners. so if libertarianism reigned, your good Hearted people would be constantly victimized by those lawless others. a skeleton govt would be adequate if the society was white and Christian, for example. unfortunately, we’re too full of degenerates who only respond to force.
LikeLiked by 9 people
The degenerates are there due to the welfare (AKA free shit) system that the UK gives them. Libertarians hate welfare. No free shit, no degenerates there to leech on the tax payers. Only people that support open borders and welfare are retarded.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Liberty can only really work in the hands of a subset of well bred, properly educated NW Euro men. This is why the United States prospered, it was Lebensraum settled and built by those men: English, French, Germans, Scandicucks. And then it went downhill.
We won’t be seeing anything resembling liberty in our lifetime. Just the opposite.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Libertarianism could work in a land run by “white men of good character” (e.g. normal NW-Euro white men), but that is because nearly any type of government would work in a land run by white men of good character. Demography is destiny.
LikeLike
Your G0d-d@mned FAKE IDEOLOGY was invented by a (decidedly foreign) self-appointed elite, you phucking idiot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Try to get this concept through your thick skull: ALL IDEOLOGIES ARE ONE FORM OR ANOTHER OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE.
And your Insula-Dominant/Amygdala-Submissive neural net got pwned by friggin Lizard People masquerading in human skin suits.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Cap is on fire…
LikeLike
Ayn Rand didn’t invent liberty. The western world has been doing philosophy for a bit longer than that.
Personally, I think you would like reading her, CO. You’re both insane spergs who highly respect the ZFG alpha (which all her protagonists are) and she had real insight into the shitlib mind. The problem was that she was a Chosen cut off from any sense of family and homeland and higher power, and thought everyone should be as atomized as she was. There’s a reason she appeals to spergs.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLike
LikeLike
He made his mission, not his woman, his priority.
LikeLiked by 2 people
@guest
Ayn Rand invented libertardianism, tho.
LikeLike
Ayn Rand hated libertarians. Another straw man.
LikeLike
Ok Captain, if I am naive in thinking that increasing individual liberty and decreasing the power of swamp creatures over the general population would solve many of today’s problems – what is your solution (a practical one)?
LikeLike
Long poast (unsurprisingly) in m0d.
LikeLike
And you will never have the traditions, morals and social pressure needed to run a civilized society unless you have a state maintaining social cohesion by maintaining ethnic homogeneity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Libertopia requires a high trust society. That means a population descended from inside the Hanjnal line. Like England before 1914, when tradition, morals and social pressure actually worked. No street shitting, please, we’re civilized English.
But open borders for your Libertopia and once the place gets enough Africans and Indians and Chinese and Aztecs and South Americans, you can’t have nice things anymore. Like Libertopia. Because different traditions, morals and no social pressure applied to People of Color you racist!
I don’t know what kind of libertarians you’ve met…
Potheads and neckbeards. Some neckbearded potheads. Social retards.
Hey, I met Gary Johnson and he doesn’t have a beard. He ran for President. I think this year he’s running for something else. What office have you run for?
How much pot do you smoke per week?
LikeLike
Please. Weren’t the Limeys already shitting in the streets of London before the niggers got there?
I bet you don’t even have a job.
LikeLike
Weren’t the Limeys already shitting in the streets of London before the niggers got there?
You’re right, because all the Romans were black and Shakespeare was black and look at all the great restaurants Londonistan has now so everyone is the same under the skin so moar immigration now and free pot will fix it up.
I bet you don’t even have a job.
Imma run Gary Johnson’s campaign if I can find out where it is. You? Hydroponic pot farming?
LikeLike
I don’t smoke weed and I don’t care for Gary Johnson very much. The Libertarian Party is a Koch-funded distraction in many ways. I’m more of a libertarian at heart, in terms of the Christian ethos of convincing people to do the right thing by the power of example rather than by coercing then through laws. Maybe I’m not so extreme (complete anarchist) but I think our problem today is too many laws, too much power in the hands of parasitic sophists, not the other way around. And more laws and more regulations and more restrictions are not a good approach, nor is mandating morality. Political power attracts swamp creatures and they are the last people I want dictating morality. I have more trust in the population at large.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Onion was pretty on with this one:
https://www.theonion.com/look-i-wish-i-were-better-at-this-also-1819585043
LikeLike
Animals copulating in public, oblivious to their surroundings, is really nothing new. Although, I’ve never seen primates do it before.
LikeLiked by 3 people
[…] London Falling […]
LikeLike
Zeus send 🔥
LikeLiked by 1 person
Burn it down.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“at least we defeated the Nazis.”
Instead of going back in time and killing Hitler, someone should go back and kill Churchill. Instead of the Battle of Britain, invite them in and throw roses.
The awake/red pilled Londoner’s wish they spoke German.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Can we put Woodrow fucking Wilson on the hit list too? Dirty cunt…
LikeLiked by 8 people
I loathe Churchill most of all the traitors, because his writings and speeches reveal that he knew the (((enemy))) would destroy the West, ie the White world.
And he helped them anyway.
So time travel to receipt and file Churchill and Wilson? Sounds damned good.
PS. It’s unlikely they would have ended up speaking German anyway. See, for example, Vichy. They probably would have had an occupation zone with some panzergrenadier divisions there to keep a lid on things, and would have set up Mosley to run the rest.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Churchill was the true villain of WWII. That’s why they still make fawning biographies of him.
LikeLike
I’ve no idea what Churchill’s end game was. And he was voted out in 1946 for a socialist government only 1 year after his “greatest triumph”.
He ignored the Bengali famine (you might want to feed your WW2 allies), made huge strategic errors in WW1 in the Dardanelles which cost hundred of lives and his WW2 actions well we all know how that turned out.
He once called arabs dogs – well his country is flooded with them.
Puts his dealings with (((The Focus))) into perspective.
LikeLike
Not a Whitey left in Blighty …
So much for the sun never setting on the British Empire.
LikeLike
It’s time for Whites to multicultural themselves into Africa and fix the lack of diversity there. Imagine the capital investment potential!
LikeLike
We tried that… That’s why they can read. Some of them.
LikeLiked by 3 people
‘Whites forced education down our throats, it’s actually not our thing’, South Africa Education Min. http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3683054/posts
LikeLike
Ask the whites of S Africa or Zimbabwe how that’s working out…
LikeLiked by 4 people
S Africa and Zimbabwe have not fully resolved their lack of diversity of the White flavor. They must be cured immediately.
LikeLike
It’s a jungle out there.
LikeLike
Caribbean grossness.
West Indians (Indian people who live in the “West Indies”..NOT Black Caribbeans) arent much better. Theyre basically naggers.
LikeLike
Hindoo West Indians?
LikeLike
For what is worth, behavior like this one the street from any race is deplorable. But to put it in perspective, if these were white frat boys, the #metoo banhammer would be swung with full force. But these are niggers, so this is seem as “cultural”.
Wait until the Islamists take more of London over. Of all people, I highly doubt they would tolerate dindu shenanigans. I bet that woman getting humped would get stoned, and not in that cool Cheech and Chong way.
LikeLiked by 3 people
His Masters Voice
I hate linking the NY Times
But I am always reassured when these Trump speeches are leaked as he seems genuine
LikeLike
“Make sure all of your people vote…you are one election away from losing everything you’ve got”
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is no blue wave.
LikeLike
He’s not wrong.
Which is why I’m going to have to hold my nose and vote for the local Republican vermin. Dammit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The worst part is British schools gaslight the children by teaching them that this is normal. London has always been a multicultural city, even before Roman times.
LikeLiked by 3 people
There was no London before Roman times, it was founded by Romans.
London was 99%+ white and mostly English at the beginning of the 20th century
Ars you and Rocco liars or just ignorant fools who like to sound Knowledgeable without ever having never read a history book.
LikeLike
I’m guessing that English isn’t your first language, because Cuddles isn’t saying that London has always been a multicultural city. He’s saying that’s what’s being taught in order to gaslight (ie psychologically manipulate and destroy the perspective of) the British. He would agree that it was 99%+ white and mostly English at the beginning of the 20th century.
LikeLike
Commiefornia has been effectively naggerized as well.
Take a look at the nextgen elected leaders-lol. Future is female!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6106135/California-councilwoman-blasts-slut-shaming-blackmailers.html
Glad you’re all my bros.
FE
LikeLike
This bitch has higher T than some of my male friends.
LikeLike
“was targeted by blackmailers who tried to slut-shame her by posting photos of her in her underwear at Burning Man online”
This slut has no shame…
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Rachel Hundley, 35…”
Amazing what the cock carousel can do to women. She looks 55.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That is a hard 35
LikeLike
The DailyMail ran an interview from 2009 in which a group of Brit WWII veterans were interviewed and asked about the war and if they had to, would they do it all over again (answer the call to duty). To a man, they all said that they would not having witnessed the U.K.’s present day status.
LikeLiked by 4 people
You beat me to it, Truth Hammer! Here is the link to that article:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This-isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html
LikeLike
Some dudes on here might like John King’s The Football Factory. In it is a WW2 British vet who says the same thing. Bit sad overall at how these veterans were treated. That’s why I would never fight a war unless I really had to. Today’s “heroes” are tomorrow’s “old white men pissing on lampposts with their opinions” (Jeong) and “if it were not for immigrants who would take care of them in their retirement homes” (Clinton) or ”they don’t like people coming in who look different to them and are performing better” (Obama at the Mandela conference)
LikeLike
The Führer would never have tolerated such behavior in the streets of Berlin… thank God the “Free World” allied itself with the Soviet Union to defeat him, eh?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Interesting, isn’t it, that the Western countries which allied to destroy racial nationalism in Europe are the ones which are, in the main, being annihilated fastest by wog invasion?
The USA, swamped under mountains of beaners and weird third-world riff-raff. Britain, being dissolved in real time by masses of dervishes and whole impis of naygrows.
The French, second-tier wreckers, being destroyed more slowly.
The Swedes are the outliers, of course, since they kind of helped the Germans during the war. But in the main, karma is a real effing bitch.
Notable also that the communist countries — who essentially went fascist to survive, albeit with a commie veneer — are the ones standing up best to foreign infiltration.
The Western democracies defeated themselves when they tore down the Nationalists’ houses. It’s just taken a couple of generations for it to become apparent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Being hoisted by one’s own petard didn’t become a cliche` in a vacuum.
LikeLike
So true, Sir Greg. So true. Alas.
LikeLike
That’s because the isms that are destroying the West’s will to live were headworms created by the KGB and inserted into Western societies as a PsyOp. They didn’t keep any of these artificially-created mental illnesses for themselves. Thus you have the spectacle of a suicidal West and an East that is much healthier, psychologically.
LikeLike
I read an interesting essay regarding this. It’s basic premise was that when the west defeated the racist nazis, in the process the unofficial religion of the west became egalitarianism. Jesus was supplanted by mahin loofa kang. And satan was supplanted by Hitler.
LikeLike
“At least we defeated the Nazis” goes up there “at least I have the Constitution.”
LikeLiked by 3 people
When you see something like this, one can begin to understand why the Weimar republic failed and why the population voted in a totalitarian mentally ill dictator. Scenes like that just wouldn’t be tolerated. We’ve swung to far in the other direction to a society of feckless appeasing idiots. Too scared to say anything because it’s politcally incorrect or we may hurt someone’s feelings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hitler lost the election and was later appointed. He was not voted in.
LikeLike
That’s too simplistic. What actually happened is that he formed a “minority government.” This is a possibility in nearly all parliamentary systems — where there is no clear majority party, the president or monarch has the ability to try to “form” a government by appointing a prime minister or chancellor, usually by horsetrading with the other parties for cabinet positions.
Hindenburg thought that he could box Hitler in — and keep the communists out — by naming him chancellor while his party held only a third of the seats in the Reichstag. It was not an unreasonable assumption.
But to say “Hitler lost” is analogous to saying “Trump lost” in 2016 because Hillary beat him in the popular vote.
Fact is, Hitler won fair and square according to the rules of the system.
LikeLiked by 5 people
You forgot to mention only one testicle, Schlomo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And his peeing dossier
LikeLike
Also that he was into scat.
LikeLike
Yeah, I am glad that Hitler didn’t win. Things could have been really bad … oh wait.
LikeLiked by 2 people
In another bit of irony, my opinion is that the Germans lost due to Hitler’s excessive Hajnalian libertarianism.
Essentially, he thought that British would do the right thing and recognize that he had no designs against them (which he didn’t) if he simply left them alone.
It’s a matter of record that his generals wanted to stamp the British Expeditionary Force flat at Dunkirk, and to get across the Channel into England ASAP, to utterly defeat Churchill and his war party at the root.
It’s also a matter of record that Hitler disallowed this, openly stating that he wanted England to remain independent, their Empire creating stability in the world, and that once they saw the Germans standing down, they would accept his (completely genuine) offers of a peace that would demand absolutely nothing of them other than to stop fighting.
A third matter of record was that the British expected England to be crawling with German spies and even went around arresting and even killing each other on the suspicion that they were agents. In fact, there were ZERO Abwehr agents in England in 1940, because Hitler had peaceful intentions towards England and therefore reflexively assumed they would reciprocate — libertarian thinking to a T, in the alleged monstrous dictator.
(They tried parachuting agents in once Hitler partly realized the British didn’t want peace, but by then it was too late.)
Basically, Hitler’s high trust behavior doomed the Reich. And possibly, bitterly, White civilization at the same time.
LikeLiked by 3 people
In a related point, my considered opinion is that the Germans had one victory condition for winning the war.
Take England.
Had they taken England, there would have been no effective mustering point for D-Day. Britain is basically a gigantic aircraft carrier and landing craft parked off the French coast. The Americans were able to muster millions of men and vast logistical support there, which would have been impossible had the Germans taken it in 1940.
Even more importantly, without England’s excellent airfields, there would have been NO strategic bombing of Germany. Their factories would have worked unimpeded; they wouldn’t have lost 50%-60% of their materiel (tanks, artillery, etc. etc.) to aircraft attacks on their rail system the way they actually did.
With German factories running at full capacity, and 100% of the manufactured weapons reaching the front, the Soviets would have been forced to make peace. They barely won even with all the advantages they had from 1943 on.
In 1940, the choice for the Germans was: take England and win, or leave England alone and lose. They picked door #2, but they could have flipped the script totally, IMO, by landing the Green Devils and other hardass gentlemen in the “green and pleasant land.” No England = no Allied victory.
(Once they didn’t take it, they had no chance. Churchill was building up anthrax bomb stocks in 1944 with the intention of eradicating Germany. They were only spared because he had only 400,000 out of the 4.25 million bombs he wanted before unleashing it on them, at the time of surrender.)
(Interestingly, several German scientists approached Hitler about starting a biological warfare program; he forbade them to do so. Winnie had no such scruples. Can dig up citations if needed.)
LikeLiked by 2 people
Your post reflects very common misunderstandings about the German war aims. “Taking England” was never, ever a serious option or policy goal for Hitler or for Imperial Wilhelmine Germany. Sure, they had contingency plans drawn up for it. All militaries do this. But it was never seriously considered. Here’s why:
Russia and, to a lesser extent, France, were Germany’s historic enemies. When Bismarck unified Germany in 1865-70 out of a number of Germanic principalities, most of the territorial disputes were int he East. Remember, Prussia, the biggest Germanic kingdom, is now called “Poland.” In other words, you had a clash between the Tsarist and Kaiserist empires.
In order to take on Russia — the bigger enemy — successfully, Germany needed to avoid a two-front war. In World War I, they employed the Schlieffen Plan, which was to score a quick victory against France and then take on Russia. This failed in 1918; they scored a decisive victory against Russia but got bogged down in France when the British intervened.
Subsequently, at Versailles, Germany lost not only its hard-fought gains int he East, but had historic German and Prussian territory confiscated by the allies. At the same time, Jewish-Bolshevist Russia was threatening global communist takeover, and Trotsky & Co. sponsored no less than three attempted communist coups in Germany and one in Hungary.
So Hitler’s main objective of the war was to defeat the Jewish-Communist USSR, not England. He only wanted England out of the way and off the continent France off his back so he could avoid a two-front war and take on his main rival. Indeed, he had succeeded wildly with his objectives by 1940 and spent an entire year preparing for Operation Barbarossa, which came within 50 miles of capturing Moscow. Hitler was not a “military moron” as another poster on this thread has claimed; he was a gambler who was willing to go for broke and bet it all. He came very, VERY close to winning. As I said earlier, one of the main reasons (not the ONLY reason, though) he lost was that the U.S. allied itself with the SOVIET-fucking-UNION. Let that sink in for a moment next time they tell you you live in the “free world.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Our points aren’t necessarily at odds with one another.
LikeLike
I’ve said this here before: Adolf Hitler, political and economic genius, military moron.
LikeLiked by 1 person
he was national socialist .
guess which part (national or socialist) tought him to build concentration camps.
the hate for the jews was taught him by weimar republic.
he lacked the morals to tell nationalism from horror, and sold his soul, and the soul of his nation instead of serving it.
LikeLike
The hate for the jew was taught to him by… the jews.
And if memory serves, the US itself, in its “hate” for japs, also built concentration camps…
… the fact that our cities and railroads weren’t being bombed into oblivion meant that typhus and starvation and partisan guerilla reprisals never happened, and six gorillion Orientals only had their land stolen, but escaped with their lives.
LikeLike
Read any of the writings and letters at source.
NS Germany were encircled by Britain, France and the Soviet Union who all wanted them dead and imposed sanctions. Even FDR imposed sanctions before Pearl Harbor.
The only solution was to break out.
Expand, grow, secure resources for your people and take out your enemies.
His only mistake was losing and I guess invading the old fashioned way.
He should have done it the modern Frankfurt school way….immigration…German refugees…encourage women, gays and minorities to rise up…political correctness…etc
LikeLike
Lichthof — just to play devil’s advocate for a moment …. wouldn’t it be something if, once the West is weakened enough, by wogs, by faggots, by women, by insanity — the T-90s roll west under a sky full of Sukhoi and MiG jets…
… and in the Kremlin, Putin or his successor clinks glasses with an ancient KGB general?
“Cheers, comrade … long-term planning and Soviet cultural assassination pays off at last!”
LikeLike
I wonder if left tards really believe, I mean deep down in their small-souls, that the world will be better without White people. Here you go faggots. Here’s your world without White people. Three negros fornicating in the streets to jungle music as the power grid fails and water runs out.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Poor future time orientation. It goes with the low IQ.
LikeLike
the ones with moral are somewhat silenced even inside the Holy Church.
how can you expect moral from foreigners (no matter they are in the west for 3 generations, they shout animist Africa with every cell of their body).
LikeLike
The Notting Hill carnival…
The media over here push it as some happy-clappy festival where all the diverse cultures get together and sing kum ba yah.
The truth is everyone who lives in and around that part of London is absolutely sick of it. Many of the locals have to board their homes up to avoid breaks-in and vandalism, but still return to litter and excrement.
I know a couple of black cab drivers who refuse to go anywhere near it.
Not to mention the rather worrying crime statistics, that the shilib media wave away with a mixture of condescension and sophistry.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLike
“Son… Did you watch that video? They exist… Niggers exist.” — Racist Pops
LikeLike
That negress needs to be nude.
LikeLike