It personally offends me that Big Tech companies staffed by alien oligarchs, like Paypig and Goolag and Twatter, can demonetize and deplatform and silence the voices of ideological adversaries. This TRULY is not who we are. America, land of the dox, home of the censor? Not on my watch.
So it heartens that dissident opinion is gelling around an effective counter-attack to hobble Big Tech and make them kiss the Heritage America ring. From Macro Investor:
PayPal will cancel their relationship with any platform that posts the rantings of lunatics and assorted a$$hats. Selectively I am sure.
So social media are not platforms, they are publishers. Just what Zuckerf*g has fought against, because he knows it opens up a very expensive can of worms. As soon as you start editing and choosing, you can no longer claim to have no affiliation with content providers.
This is big and I’m 100 percent sure the reds are writing legislation as we speak. Get your popcorn supply now.
Bingo. Big Tech has gotten away with financially and politically exploiting a gray area between platform and publisher, straddling each and switching roles whenever it suits their needs. Are they a platform and therefore not responsible for user content, or are they a publisher and vulnerable to liabilities ranging from libel to violations of campaign finance laws?
From the looks of it, the FAAGs (Facecock, Apple, Amazog, Goolag et al) have been acting as publishers. Paypig demonetizes anyone now who is outed by the shitlib NPC swarm as a heretic to Globohomo orthodoxy. Goolag rigs search results to amplify leftoid sites and drown out nationalist sites. Twatter has a veritable coven of witch hunters who spend all day every day deactivating the accounts of anyone who has said a mean word about an icon of the Left or questioned a tenet of shitlib faith.
And it’s so totally one-sided as to constitute an in-kind campaign contribution to the Democortez Party.
Either way — platform or publisher — Big Tech loses, as long as the government forces it to one side or the other. If platform, then the FAAGs have to tolerate thought criminals using their services, just as if they were a common carrier, like a telephone utility. If publisher, then Big Tech can be sued to kingdom come and charged with innumerable violations of federal law.
No wonder Big Tech Billionaires are shoveling money into Democrat coffers! They need the House in Dem hands as badly as treason maestro Rod Rosenstein needs a false flag to delay his congressional testimony!
Because if you think the Dems will do anything about Big Tech’s predations, you are a fantasist. The Dems and Big Tech are in an incestuous relationship; the former gets money, the latter gets a wink and a nod to continue shitting in the face of Heritage America. If Dems get the House, all the real legit investigations will be prematurely stopped and replaced by Fake Investigations into Trump and the Proud Boys that will keep the media orgasming for two years straight, until Trump is reelected in a landslide on an even MAGAier agenda.
CEO — Dan Schulman
CFO — John Rainey
Chief of Business Affairs — Louise Pentland
Corporate Affairs and Communications — Franz Paasche
Chief Technology Officer — Sri Shivananda
One of these perps is the primary party responsible for Paypig’s intolerant demonetization spree. Which one? My bet is on the woman. But, you know….Schulman. Sri? Could be! But wait….Franz Paasche. With any luck we’ve found our cuck!

I’ve been in a year long dispute with Paypal where they’ve tried to sic collectors on me for a fake debt of $300. I sent the creditors a certified letter asking them to prove the debt and it moves to a new creditor. They have always been a fucking terrible company and I hope this wakes some people up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] Platform Or Publisher? How Big Tech Can Be Brought To Its Knees […]
LikeLike
A lot of readers might not know that PayPal was at one point a monumental step for small time internet entrepreneurs seeking to monetize electronically. I can imagine that PayPal was big in wn circles at this beginning stage and so necessitated rapid convergence. Here we are.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Peter Thiel is a decent homo, though a degenerate queer nonetheless. His departure signaled that company’s downfall.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Left has had a monopoly on distribution of both entertainment and intellectual discourse for so long, they are in a panic they have lost the latter thanks to the internet and fear losing the former. So they are trying to regrip it through big tech monopoly.
LikeLike
Just FYI for heartiste and co, I am a bit toasty this evening so my comments may be multiple and a ranty, fair warning. But I’m getting off GoDaddy ASAP.
LikeLike
So I guess you are saying you’ll be doubling down on the asshole this eve, spergo ?
LikeLike
rofl. The cucks are out in force tonight!
LikeLike
Hate speech is not free speech. Thanks to Reich wing extremists like Sayoc and Bowers, it looks like progressive Democrats are poised to take the House and the Senate.
And then once Drumpf is voted out of office, we can finally have comprehensive immigration reform where white male privilege can be eradicated once and for all.
One world, one race.
LikeLike
Wow brilliant speech.
LikeLike
Are you the Spirit within, or just a bad case of gas?
Speaking of Hate Speech, how’s bout I take care of you, lil’ faggot?
LikeLike
OT: I read a link at your Goodbye America site to the cuckoldry article.and learned something you should share directly with your readers.
https://www.cvs.com/shop/identigene-dna-paternity-test-prodid-420841
$26.99 to verify paternity (the article quoted $50, so now it’s cheaper)
LikeLike
Stifling opposition comms is a mistake because you don’t know what they are thinking or planning.
LikeLike
It shows how scared shitlibs are prior to mid term elections that they shut down the ONLY free speech social media site. Terrified, in my opinion, of truths seeing the light of day.
LikeLike
I’d like Trump to make this an issue for the midterms (i.e. vote R if you want us to go after the self-appointed Internet censors) but he might figure it’s best to focus on the core stuff (immigration, 2A, etc).
LikeLike
False flag ranting and now this insane screed?
You have officially gone off the deep end,
Look, NOBODY thinks like you guys do.
There is a reason you are being feplatformrd.
[CH: “benny meyer” lol]
LikeLike
The Israelis think like we do. You’re not an anti-semite, are you?
LikeLike
B-b-benny and the AIDS
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry, man, but I laughed for a full minute at b-b-benny and the aids. You know, how some things just hit you square on the funny bone…
The best kind of funny is stoopid funny. That is Jackass level yuks. Can’t even explain it.
LikeLike
feplatformrd
fleflaffformrrd
flfflafforrmrorrdd
Somebody be a good goy and get our non-shellfish eating friend an uber.
LikeLike
I was kicked off twitter. No explanation. Nothing.
Fuck them all. Let them live in their shithole world.
LikeLike
Who cares about steel, oil and other bulky stuff, when you can control information flow?
For a long time, I did not understand why such a solid wall of internet companies (loosely defined) are way left of center.
A friend had to set me straight, it only took a few words.
But I will expand a little.
The old captains of industry cared about mainly two things.
1) Money (no surprise)
2) It appears they actually enjoyed BUILDING things, Taggart-style.
The new captains of internet claim to care about poor people.
They do not, that is either a lie or incidental.
They care about ONE THING:
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
1) Power
LikeLike
The solution to defeating centralized Silicon Valley giants is not to use centralized Silicon Valley giant wannabes.
If you don’t want tech lording over you then don’t give your data to tech overlords.
Bitcoin, not PayPal
EtherTweet, not Twatter
Diaspora, not Facebook (yes I know about the (((name))) but it’s legit)
LikeLike
I don’t see how government regulation is the answer, for two reasons.
(1) The government tried de-platforming first — with Operation Choke Point. There’s no guarantee they won’t do it again.
(2) Just like existing regulatory agencies, any new ones will quickly be captured by the largest firms in the industries they supposedly regulate.
I’d feel much safer against the next de-platforming attempt if there were 20 or 50 “PayPals” (competitors with PP), mostly in other countries.
As for Gab itself, let’s turn it into (or replace it with) a peer-to-peer app, designed not to have any single point of failure, so that no one can shut it down.
LikeLike