Riffing on the news story about Ivanka Trump going to Africa to dance with the natives like a virtue supplicating idiot, Dawg wrote,
Sorry dudes I gotta blame us, you see the chick herd is in an unsettled state and when the heifers and cows are unsettled shit gets real, real stupid, real quick. They want a herd bull to settle em.
No joke, as an over-arching theory explaining the insanity currently roiling the shattered minds of xenophilic Western White wahmen, this one by Dawg is better than most I’ve read.
The heifers and cows are in a tizzy because their world is falling apart around them, their men are retreating into porn and effeminacy, their nation is taking on the quality of a random equatorial shithole, and they are being asked to wear the pants in this extended family we call America.
We’re gonna need a bigger bull.
Unfortunately, the only bull these broads deserve is a big BULL DYKE! Rosie O’Donnell anyone? Takers?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dawg: “They want a herd bull to settle em.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve been thinking for a while and we’re reaching an inflection point where the millennial spinsters are about to hit the wall in force. I see it everyday, everywhere in the city. Regret. So many of them are starting to realize their parents and families would be so much more amazing and happy if they had children instead of MBAs and J.Ds.
We’re gonna see an entire generation miss their window and regret and anger will be what’s left. I hope for a backlash from women against feminism but only about 2 women I’ve ever met have had that left of self reflection.
I don’t know what comes next but the current environment isnt stable so it must be transitive.
LikeLiked by 11 people
They will blame white men. It’s gonna be a shitshow.
What a time to be alive.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Of course they’ll blame us, I’ve relised that as the end game in all this crap for years now. After all what else would they do, take responsibility for their giant chimp out? No.
They’ve shit the nest till it’s getting to a point where some of them are beginning to realise that they’reactually going to have to start eating it… so the blaming of us should start soon.
The fact they called us their oppressors for decades, voted for the pumping in of the turd world even AFTER the gang raping started and lead the way in commissar crap in the universities won’t matter a bit. They’ll just say everything is our construct and we must do something. And I will, I’ll watch it all on tv.
Swedish men have left Sweden in droves, I saw years ago some Swedish census saying they’re short half a million white Swedish men. The feminists raged at the “hate” it implied and that they couldn’t handle “equality”. Then it just stopped being mentioned. I guess the same exodus will happen in other western countries as the shitcuntfreakshow rises.
LikeLiked by 4 people
If there’s ever going to be a Big Fat American Civil War 2, this will be the undercurrent that gets the shit moving right into the fan. A nadir of civility, an uptick in female irrationality that pushes men out of the workforce, the frenetic inner conflict of women trying to scratch the itch for alpha brutality while simultaneously maintaining control over men that manifests as massive societal BPD quality shit tests…
Trust me, the non-White peasants being imported into the States mostly don’t even know wtf Feminism is, and it’s part of the reason they’re so fecund. They haven’t drunk deeply from that poisoned well and maybe our elites don’t intend for them to. The Whites that inherit the West will be the ones who rightly relegate Feminism and other aspects of cultural Marxism to museum exhibitions and academic textbooks alongside the other dead gods and ideologies of human history.
Out with Lilith, in with Eve.
LikeLiked by 4 people
yes…so what you’re gonna wanna do is convert to islam and start beating them
LikeLike
Trav do you really expect Whyte men to start converting to Islam and beating women? They can’t even stop beating their meat long enough to beat a wet noodle. We need a war with Mexico now. A race war. Then White men would know what it’s like to conquer rape and pillage something for once in their pathetic lives.
LikeLiked by 4 people
i don’t know if they will or they won’t…
right now it looks like no.
they’d rather preach scriptures written by jews.
like all that shit about Sodom and Gomorrah…we’re now taking a JEW’s word for that? it was an amoral city full of fags, says a jew.
even jesus, a jew; we’re taking his word for things…
meanwhile in EVERY other circumstance, these people are filthy liars who should never be trusted. But the bible is different. THOSE jews were telling the truth…right.
Either recapture the moral high ground or die…abolition wasn’t frankfurt school, it was christianity. 100 fucking percent it was bible thumping christian abolitionists who were the ground troops.
Someone will be along shortly to defend their parasitic infection…it’s OUR way, huh? to the end
LikeLike
Yeah Trav we get it. You don’t really understand what the Bible teaches about anything. Christ was fully God as well as fully man. The fact He was a Jew has almost nothing to do with listening to a Jew. He was sinless. Nothing He ever did was wrong. The Jews rejected Him then as they do now as they will until He sees fit to turn the nation of Israel over to Himself.
This doesn’t mean that Jews have a right to start wars over what they think God owes them. They are wrong for that. And no I don’t trust everything written in the Bible. It’s not a perfect book. God gave us good sense and it’s sin not to use it. So I don’t blame you for making a mockery of it.
And I don’t blame you for jumping down their throats when they try to act all high and mighty about things that seem silly to the rest of us.
LikeLike
They should blame us. We shouldn’t have let them get away with it. It’s our fault. It’ll be great when we fix it.
LikeLike
sorry no
if Jesus was god they would not have been able to defile him
the bible is the word of JEWS; their own religion FOR THEM, not YOU.
They are a people who have trafficked in lies for their entire existence; this gigantic book is not an exception.
LikeLike
Mr. T, niggerfucker and sandnigger-lover, Aryans don’t need to learn from Semites how to treat women. Indeed, much of the older rađical-racialist literature specifically criticizes the genetic misogyny of Semites—including both true Semites (i.e. Arabians), and the sort-of-Semitic Jews.
Indeed, an Aryan would be more inclined to teach you the A B C of behaviour.
You say right after you preach a Semitic mentality toward women—right after you advocate for the religion of the Koran, which is an Arabian rifacimento of the Jewish Bible. Are you even capable of manly logic?
Are you learning mis-history from Captain Oblivion? The Frankfurt School was founded in 1923, you retard. Moreover, the nineteenth-century Abolitionist preachers lied about Christianity. The New Testament endorses slavery—actually, it specifically commands slaves to obey their masters in all matters other than religious faith.
You get extra moron-points for somehow juxtaposing the pseudohistory of Oblivion with the shystering lies of liberal preachers who directly contradicted the Bible.
You are the last person who should talk about that. Leave it to the scholars, and men otherwise acting in good faith. With your unhinged, semi-educated anti-Christian tirades, you do nothing more than to poison the well and thus, prevent all rational discussion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We have already seen this before. Women have been doing this in large numbers for 20 years at least. There was no backlash against feminism. I don’t even know if there was that much regret – they convince themselves the pets, career and leftist politics is a sufficient substitute.
Most older bachelors have received the calls and emails of the desperate 39-40 year old slags who they haven’t heard from in years, going through their contacts in a desperate and generally fruitless last ditch attempt to find a mate.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Having received a few of those calls, I can say it’s one of the most hilarious things to experience in modern times. One of the best ways to end the conversation is to remind them there’s no future for them, and that they’ve likely killed us all with their choices. The slight hitch before the stuttering insincere denial…because they know now…because they can no longer deny the reality pissing in their face…that payoff feels damn good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“CHOICES”???
STOP attributing agency to them.
HERD ANIMALS DONT MAKE CHOICES
it’s our fault allowing (((them))) to foist this upon us. (Our grandfathers and great grandfathers faults) it is our duty to clean up the (((mess)))
LikeLiked by 6 people
“HERD ANIMALS DONT MAKE CHOICES”
This.
The “women problem” is really a men problem. Fix the men and this whole feminism thing goes *poof* overnight.
But men won’t fix themselves until they are made uncomfortable. Very uncomfortable. Which feminism WILL do. So there’s that.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Women have the same ability to self reflect as Jews do.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Searched eskimotube for the phrase “woman apologizing to man.” Found this:
Then searched using the phrase “Jew apologizing.” No relevant results.
LikeLiked by 5 people
They don’t apologize do they?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Jews apologizing? But muh holocaust! The six gorillion! Foreskins and shekels!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Darth’s video – I noted the woman praised men’s gentleness, vulnerability, humility, and kindness.
Male behavior will change approximately five minutes after women start rewarding such men with enthusiastic sexual access. Don’t hold your breath.
LikeLiked by 1 person
^This
Fuck that Kunt. Dont need her to kuntsplain. I guarantee her actions irl dont back up her words. Its just her way of finding a niche to exploit for her own aggrandizement. You’re not Joan of arc, bitch. SIT DOWN
Reminds me of that video of the former sportzball nig Nigsplaining to that Asian girl. Some noggerish cadence. Same monkey hand gestures. Much bigger chompers. Probably a mud shark.
LikeLike
so i consider it (they do too) the HEIGHT of irony that you take their word for it (the bible) on anything.
LikeLike
Their briefest acquaintance with self reflection is The Wall itself.
– Why don’t men open doors for me?
– Why don’t men compliment me randomly?
– Why aren’t men asking me out anymore?
As a man you learn from an early age that the world really doesn’t give a shit about you, and certainly doesn’t care whatsoever about your feelings. Even a fairly emotionally resilient women would consider suicide if they received the same treatment the average man does. Being alive and ignored is worse than death for women.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I hope for a backlash from women against feminism but only about 2 women I’ve ever met have had that left of self reflection.”
There will be no backlash. They were (((given))) a banana and they happily took the banana. They actually think that current society is great and this is “progress” and “the way”. The 50s are evil.
In other words they were (((given))) feminism (a banana) and they sold themselves out.
Latest data from the US, Spain and Sweden shows a record number of young women identifying as feminists or being left wing.
The only thing that works is when men put them in their place. When men react to hostile activity and women know that there are consequences for their behavior, then they behave and become feminine.
But if you are a cucks and just stay there and do nothing then they will use you and even join all the others who use you.
The world is a jungle. When you are cucks, then everybody will use you, and everybody will piss on you. Including women. It is your fault for allowing this to happen.
You see, when everybody pisses on you, women will start pissing on you too. Hypergamy 101. Piss on the losers. Infact, the more you get taken over, the more hostile they will become. The feminisation of western societies is correlated with the non-white take over. The more you get taken over, the more hostile and feminist the women are becoming.
Get together and start protecting your interests like angry bulldogs, imposing real consequences for hostile behavior, and then both women and the minorities will stop fucking around with you.
LikeLike
The oldest millenials are 37 and many are basically past the reproductive window. Fertility rates are terrible as well , lowest among fertile age in US history IIRC even among Latinos who are at maybe replacement and falling fast.
That said it may not be that easy to get men back to the proverbial plantation without one hell of an offer and a lot of work
Many problems are economic and men are not going to tack down and be fathers without steady work and patriarchy both.
Cities breed weakness and dependency by their nature and for most stifle the masculine patriarchal yeoman archetype women crave. Cities geld the bulls for the safety of the city
Technology, computers and automation accelerate that effec t tremendously and while they obviously won’t get rid of all jobs, all they have to do to destroy society is arbitrage wages down a little more
We’ve had about 50 years of that and feminism and a low TFR since 1973. Go figure.
That fix won’t be easy in the least and may not even be possible which means long term, patriarchy will return in the form of the 1919 lifestyle after the future comes to an end.
Amish Paradise if you will.
LikeLike
I have a woman but I know of at least 10 women approaching 40 who have shown an interest in me and quite blatant even desperate.
Even my bank manager was borderline harassing me despite me telling her I am taken.
Desperate women not attractive.
LikeLike
I had a great day this Easter. I hope you guys did, too.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Glad to hear it Indy. Family and food replenishing body and soul.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@CH:
Do you suppose that her (((husband))) objects? To the contrary! She is doing that to screw over the goyim, i.e. you and your grandchildren (if you will even have any).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jared likes to watch
LikeLiked by 3 people
wouldn’t be at all out of the ordinary for a jew
LikeLiked by 1 person
@CH:
Anthony M. Ludovici, Man: An Indictment (1927), Introduction:
Anthony M. Ludivoci was a lion amongst old Conservatives, who has been called “the prophet of anti-feminism”. He was also a defender of aristocracy, an advocate of eugenics who provided practical personal advice on mate-selection—and an admirer of the German National Socialists, based on what he saw when he actually visited Germany.
Ludovici wrote what was essentially a series of books about how feminism was created by effeminate men. Men retreated from manhood between the late eighteenth century, and the beginning of the twentieth. Moreover, in a century of massive social change, political revolution, Industrial Revolution, etc., women didn’t like where men were taking the world—and who can blame them? Thereupon, add in the influence upon women of male feminist delusions, such as those of that pseudointellectual weakling, John Stuart Mill, a favorite of the libertarians to this day, who fantasized that women had “advanced” to be equal to men.
As with modern liberalism generally, the Jews only later opportunistically exploited their racial enemies’ mistakes, and (((perfected))) as (((their))) weapon the poison that the White man himself had created.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Ludovici wrote what was essentially a series of books about how feminism was created by effeminate men. Men retreated from manhood between the late eighteenth century, and the beginning of the twentieth. — Aristarchus
No such thing as “effeminate men.” Nor can man retreat from manhood and still be man. Might as well recognize a “lovely turd” that relinquished its stench. Such a steaming load shall be equal to an effeminate “man” retreated from manhood.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“thordaddy”, WTF? The metaphor of manhood as the “stench” of a “turd” = “toxic masculinity”. Are you perchance a feminist?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Looks like a drunk or stoned post to me.
Whatever message was intended got lost in slurred raving about stinking turds.
LikeLiked by 3 people
He’s saying that “effemenite man” is a contradiction in terms. Mutually exclusive
LikeLike
Yes DissesMyIsland… Equal to “gay man” and thus subversive on a whole other level. I’m not accusing the defendant of malice, merely pointing out his very liberated frame.
LikeLike
I repeat..
No such thing as “effeminate men.” Nor can man retreat from manhood and still be man.
Looks like you should look again, Ironsides.
IF though… You attest to the reality of “effeminate man,” well then, I should suppose you’ll attest to the reality of a “lovely turd,” too?
And, I suppose if you believe “man” can retreat from manhood and still be man, well then, your “lovely turd” just is so because it’s devoid of its own “stench.”
LikeLike
Aristarchus…
There is NO SUCH THING as “effeminate men.”
This is your LIBERATED IMAGINATION.
Likewise, a man who retreats from manhood is no longer man.
To think, conceive, imagine or wish otherwise is TO BE LIBERATED.
It is not “liberation” that you seek, rather, it is (S)upremacy that you desire.
LikeLike
Sorry, dude, that falls into the “gender is a construct” argument. All men are men; some are just very poor examples. Language matters.
LikeLike
No, Enoch…
Racist Man is the ideal.
“Poor examples” of the ideal are not the ideal.
Adult females who diddle little girls are no more “ladies” than effeminate adult males are “‘men.”
Drawing this kind of hard line is exactly what is required to pushback again the sickNarrative where “men” can diddle little boys and still be “men.” That’s a perviverse.
LikeLike
thordaddy: In my prolific posts, I usually use the term “effeminate males”. One time, I used the term “effeminate men”. You took that as an opportunity to compare masculinity to shit (!), followed by a repetitious string of hyperventilating over my allegedly “LIBERATED IMAGINATION”.
I am beginning to understand why some folks are fond of Internet armchair diagnoses of Asperger’s.
In case that wasn’t clear: Fuck off.
EnochRoot: You raise a good point about biological sex; though in this context, I think it’s arguable if that relates. Language does matter, indeed; and that is why I typically try to avoid potential conflation of something that can be confusing to the literal-minded: Multiple senses of a single word.
Among other senses, the noun “man” can refer to a generic adult male human, or to a generic human of indeterminate sex (in the usage that drives feministing womyns crazy!), or to mankind collectively (again!), or to a husband (“man and wife”)—or to a MAN, in the sense of virile manhood. In political discussions, I prefer emphasis on that last.
But I would not throw a “manosphere”-politically-correct hysterical conniption fit over the use of the word “man” in a manner consistent with about (off the top of my head) at least four-plus centuries of the development of the English language. (In Old English, the word “mann” was more generic; “wer” was the term specifically referring to adult males.) If I were to be upset over unmanly use of the term “man”, then I would need to customarily put the word “‘manosphere'” in scare-quotes—oops!
LikeLike
Aristarchus: that would all be well and good, but the word was “men,” not “man.” You’re a pretty fart smeller, so I’ll chalk it up to simple oversight this time, but in the future, if you wish to maintain your title Loquacious Erudition IV, you’ll have to be more precise.
Man can be its own plural, as in a covenant between Man and God, but that is a less used version today. Now, we like to avoid confusion and use mankind, humankind, or even humans. But the word men is almost never used to refer to the species, but to plural of males of the species. Therefore, there is no confusion in the word men as to whether it refers to one of the sexes or the species. My statement stands. Men are men, regardless their lack of proper upbringing, which I think is the whole point behind red-pilling.
LikeLike
It’s wild how an individual can be so precise and then chuck that precision to the side when he wants to take passive jabs at a particular type of man.
Aristarchus’ reference to “effeminate men” was, in fact, pointing at Englishman, specifically. He wasn’t writing of jewish man or nigger man or whatnot. The jab was at “white man” and THE LIBERATED IDEA that “white man” can be a faggot and/or effeminate AND STILL BE A real white man.
Now, Aristarchus, you begrudgingly conceded to my point. But I don’t really expect you to get your act together, regardless.
PS. “Feminism,” because it contains not one scintilla of femininity, is not really anything feminine and thus not “feminism” in any coherent manner. Words do matter.
PSS. Are a white (S)upremacist or not?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Edit:
PSS. Are YOU a white (S)upremacist or not?
LikeLike
Edit:
PSS. Are YOU a white (S)upremacist or not?
LikeLike
It’s a long cycle.
There’s an exhibition up at Trinity College, Oxford in the dining hall. Wahmin of Trinity.
It made me think hard about how the acollege was founded on the grounds owned by the Bishop of Durham to effectively educate his monks and clergy. After the dissolution of the monasteries Thomas Pope buys out Durham’s holdings and starts up the college to have the students pray for his soul in the afterlife. It’s all men up until the 1970s and no blacks allowed.
How long did it take to build the school that produced a giant like Pitt and how quickly it was engulfed in PC groveling to be at its present state of abjection?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Captain John Charity Spring MA: This sparked a comment requiring
researchbanging my head against the walls erected by the (((gatekeepers of knowledge))). I hope to follow up later with something that should interest you.P.S., my respect for you increases with each post of this nature that you make.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are an insufferable prick, but that ain’t a bad post.
Schopenhauer’s “On Women” still stands as my favorite though.
https://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html
LikeLike
Paracelsus:
To distinguish Schopenhauer’s position from my own was an important point that I omitted for brevity.
For convenience, I will quote Ludovici’s Enemies of Women: The Origins in Outline of Anglo-Saxon Feminism (1948), Introduction (actually the first substantial words of the book):
So as for mişogyny: I am vehemently against it. —Meaning, actual mişogyny, not the feminist redefinition of “mişogyny” to mean “opposition to gynarchy”.
I don’t usually reply to Fł@t Earŧhers, except to mock them; but you provided the opportunity for an important clarification.
LikeLike
m0d test
LikeLike
LikeLike
Schopenhauer called women “overgrown children,” I dare you to prove that wrong. Go to any coffeehouse and listen to any conversation women are having. From young to old, it is the same identical banal conversation.
I don’t hate them, I understand them. Any man who has had even a modicum of success with women knows how they are.
LikeLike
The most remarkable, central word in all that being “useful”.
From a feminine standpoint, “useful” is the core and kernel and nucleus and fulcrum of it all when it comes to men.
And since nature, merciful as it is, makes people like doing what they have to do, men have become practiced at feeling proud. Proud of what? Of being useful!
LikeLike
It is an inflection point.
I many ways women are the ultimate voting block. A Herd is as good an explanation as any.
Women are so powerful in the west. But all of them are so unhappy. Much like a dog chasing a car, the dog has no idea what to do if they actually catch the car.
Women today have mostly caught the car, and have no idea what to do. Feminism is based on women not being equal. Now that the equality car has been caught no one is guiding the herd. The Herd runs aimlessly from one fake controversy to another. Equal Rights, Equal Pay, MeToo it’s all the bleating for ever more
What happened is that men quit applying resistance. Men in the west said sure go ahead and try to be in charge.
Women desperately need to receive feedback on limits. Without it they go a bit crazy.
This is why when a man pushes back strongly against woman’s virtue signalling after a bit of playacting normally the woman will not make a big deal about it.
Women don’t hold any ideals sacred. They are happy to adopt the ones that help her get what she wants. With her friends and college weak bros it’s always the liberal agenda. And in that world weak soybois don’t resist not at all. So what’s a young fertile woman to do? She’s been told she does not need to worry about motherhood til 30. What does she do for the 10 years from 22 to 32?
Apparently these heifers have decided collectively to run from one outrage clover patch to another without stopping to wonder why they are running.
So yes big bulls need to be brought in. But like a hyena pack some of the females feel that they should be the Alpha. So bulls should just cut a few choice cows out of the herd now. Let the hyena’s keep leading the herd to nowhere. It will happen the cows will quit following, eventually.
Whatching that herd running around doing nothing is enjoying the decline.
LikeLiked by 8 people
Pro comment
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yep. A woman wants a man to tell her, No.
Not only to tell her no, but to stand by his decision, even if she doesn’t like it.
LikeLiked by 4 people
In fairness.
Transitions require time.
If they were treated as adults, and separation from answerability not allowed to them (equally, as it is not allowed to men), you’d behold some serious psychological development over a few generations, don’t you think?
And why that has no chance of happening (the real reasons — not the pack of rationalisations. The latter are easy to produce, the former hard to confront)?
Because men follow their reproductive interests — and that entail bowing to female privilege, and flatter her as much as possible, without minding one’s self-abasement.
Any group of reasonably behaving men will turn into a group of competing flatterers and bow-downers soon as a non-ugly woman enters their zone, preoccupied solely with one-upping the other men.
Nothing is going to remove the root cause of this (the lack of balance between male and female zygote availability), thus nothing is going to change this.
LikeLike
OT but related re: agitated shitlibs
Z-Man’s site got totally nuked / deplatofrmed today. WordPress pulled his card finally. I -do- hope you have live backups CH as your ass is on the radar too, surely you are aware of this. They are -always- watching dissidents.
The thing that got Z’s card pulled I’m pretty sure was his last post earlier in the day where there was a discussion that was bordering on actionable regarding basically well… gu3rilla insurgency, asymmetric warfare, and how to properly foment a r3volution. TPTB do NOT like poopy talk like that so he got shoah’d. Too much goy1m knowing in one place, gotta shut it down!
Just remember, you are monitored here, don’t think for a moment you are not and when I say ‘you’ I mean all of you. They know who I am, there is a file on me, but they also know they have ‘defanged’ me already so I’m not much of a problem anymore. But ya’ll ma’fuckas? Better keep your opsec tight…
LikeLiked by 5 people
Absolutely. It’s become so simple to identify not just bloggers but commentators as well.
LikeLike
Attention monitors… make sure you spell my name right… that’s Eliot with one L.
And shoot straight, ya bastids… don’t make a mess of it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLike
It could not possibly hurt, in any way whatsoever, to post this video here. 😆
LikeLiked by 1 person
False alarm… my bad. But the advice is sound either way. Contingency plan = good.
LikeLike
“false alarm”
The point about you being neutered stands.
LikeLike
You are an obsessed keyboard warrior jock riding groupie. Said anything mean to a minority lately? Stepped to one just for fun? Punched one in the face? Of course you haven’t. That would require you to come up off the keyboard and off my dick for even a moment.
You’ll get your shot one day herb, don’t worry…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really you sharing your story a while ago. I had quite a similar experience but with a different “oppressed” group. I no longer live among the wildlife.
How did they “de-fang” you? What did they take away from you that you no longer have? What can you no longer do? Can’t badge it up any more?
They neutered you and now you don’t miss a chance to cry about how bad the system is. The system is the system dude. We’re all in it.
LikeLike
That was a more civil response (Finally) so I’ll briefly respond:
I haven’t ‘badged it up’ in well over a decade so that is a non-issue. The only thing that did was help me not get some hard time because of my background. As for what I lost, they stole everything that wasn’t nailed down because ‘muh evidence’ so being a felon, firearms aren’t a thing anymore and employment is not very easy. Hence, ‘defanged’.
But if we are being honest, they aren’t even really necessary and are VERY easy to get if you know where to look. The deadliest weapon a White Man possesses is between his ears, they didn’t splatter my brains with their pointed ARs so I was able to keep the only thing that I really need in the end. And when you start stripping highly intelligent men of their items and ability to earn you leave with them with left to lose and a big ass chip on their shoulder. (File that one under ‘be careful what you wish for’ to any (((listeners))) that park here)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tampered with my food, (my vinegar?) drugged me and gave me a plausibly deniable threat/warning. Didn’t have much to lose before, don’t have much of a record for them to work with or really engage in anything illegal, but they did do a little smear campaign which seems to have left the cops in my native Podunk a little fearful of me. For some reason I’m not dead, though that might have to do with how others would respond if I had been killed due to their cooperation.
What I’ve learned is that our string pullers are chicken shit narcissists who can’t see past their own nose. Everything CH has addressed with concise clarity here we all felt, at least vaguely, at some point in the past would be an issue for us and the rest of society later on. Likewise, with these kinds of responses from the top, it’s obvious that their overconfidence and overreaction are leaving more critical woes (for us) and threats (to them) to act freely.
I rue their dealing with the devil and being stuck coping with the collateral effects, but I’m not above the schadenfreude of waiting to see them reap their “rewards.”
LARPpost for the day.
LikeLike
“Defanged.”
Very short-sighted of them. But let our lips stay pursed. May they receive the full consequences of all they seek.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chalk that bullshit up to agitprop Fedposting.
“I can see no-one is serious about anything around here.”
“If it were me, I would do x,y,z, at x location.”
Everyone around here knows those turds are lurking. Even TOR and VPN’s aren’t safe, exit nodes can be easily monitored, and VPN’s log user data.
But, if they want to drag me into court for calling millennials whores irredeemable pieces of shit. I’d gladly submit instagram, snapchat, and tagthesponsor as my defense evidence.
LikeLike
“Fedposting”
Imperial shills. (<—It's funny because my name is "Darth." 😃) "Fed" implies it's limited to a single nation.
LikeLike
To think he went to rather remarkable lengths to behave. Yet still…
LikeLike
“The thing that got Z’s card pulled I’m pretty sure was his last post earlier in the day where there was a discussion that was bordering on actionable regarding basically well… gu3rilla insurgency, asymmetric warfare, and how to properly foment a r3volution. TPTB do NOT like poopy talk like that so he got shoah’d. Too much goy1m knowing in one place, gotta shut it down!”
I’ve been away for about a week, but before I did, this is EXACTLY what i warned you guys about. I specifically mentioned to not talk about this “revo, 1776 esque” talk. Sad to see another blog down, but these are the times we’re living in. Feds are watching every dissident blog site/twitter/youtube account.
LikeLike
Oh goody! That means when (((they))) catch me bending 0ver their j@ilbait dawghter it wont be a surprise at all, just n0rmal.
LikeLike
Adventures in Twitter.
That platform really is faggotry to the nth degree.
Followers, Followees, Notifications, Feed.
Platform ought to be banned. It’s effiminized swathes of rightwingers.
LikeLiked by 2 people
m0d test
LikeLike
LikeLike
good post
all this online shit is Jew 2.0
THE BIBLE IS JEW 1.0
LikeLike
Thanks. Now, stop trying to troll me into a war with the Christians. I’ll fight whom I want, when I want. On non-Christian sites, I can do a much better job than you at analyzing the history, theology, and essential substance of Christianity. On a Christian site, in the context of America in 2019, I deem it rude to launch unprovoked, wholesale, wholly gratuitous attacks on the faith of White men who remain steadfast in the traditions of their forefathers.
My term “Electric Jew 2.0” was obviously a reference to the successor to television, which is commonly called the “Electric Jew” in racialist circles where niggerfuckers are uncompromisingly shunned.
(Compare the terms for the “herbal Jew”, a.k.a “niggerweed”, a.k.a M@rý Juańa as referenced in my post above.)
LikeLike
What the fuck do you know about MJ and psychs? I appreciate most of your posts, Archie, but better stay away from commenting on topics outside your sphere of knowledge.
LikeLike
Well, for starters, I know that both were and are specifically (((promoted))) to wreck and ruin the minds of the goyim.
I also know how to recognize when I have inadvertently blasphemed a man’s religion. Why are you so defensive of the surrender of your consciousness to an abørtion of the brain? The only result is to inflict on yourself the symptoms of both schizøphrenia and mental retardation, combined. Are schizø retards cool to you?
I didn’t invent the terms “niggerweed”, “herbal Jew”, etc.—much less the rational criticism of drugs that are far, far worse. I suggest that you should look into the matter.
Now, it is true that many of the world’s gross superstitions (in contradistinction to theologies) probably originated from a drug less harmful than synthetic L.S.D., i.e., Amanita muscaria, and maybe some other drugs. That does not make these things good! Indeed, the soma-addled Brahmans were in many ways the rivals of the warrior caste; and the haoma-addled Magi were racial aliens who imposed an abominable religion on Aryan Iran. I will not here comment on the evidence that use of the same hallucinatory mushroom was probably also rampant amongst (predominantly Jewish) Second-Century Christians; those cults were mostly declared “heretical” and/or “gnostic” by the Fourth-Century Church Fathers, by a neat rhetorical trick available only to the Christian sect that had obtained the police powers of the state, and could thus exterminate its rivals. Anyway, I know of no evidence that hallucinatory drug use persisted into Aryan European Christendom.
Thanks, but it turns out that I know plenty enough about drugs. Now, don’t get me started about MKULTRA, etc…. Kill your mind. Good goy.
LikeLike
“The chick herd” is a pretty damn funny turn of phrase. Also quite true.
Like
I’d say more like a gaggle.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Considering the physique of quite a few of them, perhaps a “sounder.” 😉
LikeLike
Well played, Mr. Eliot. Subtle jest of the day.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Certainly no bevy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
a “pod”
LikeLike
I read it as Click Herd.
LikeLike
Cluck herd. Cuz they’re all chickens and chicken haids
LikeLiked by 1 person
Working in a startup. I mean there’s just two of us and the boss works another job so it’s just Elmer manning the facility most of the time. It’s in a business incubator so there’s wimminz who work at government small business admin offices. I avoid them as much as possible but pass them in the hallways as they clop to the restroom.
Paraphrasing Dale Carnegie,
Every office female wears a sign : Please help me to feel offended.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Every office female wears a sign : Please help me to feel offended.
When the whole West’s Training Devices run full-time to train them to that effect, it kinda figures.
LikeLike
The 0nly thing that doesnt 0ffend her is when you bahnger on the copying machine and the kreempie goes drip drip onto teh surface and you hit 99 qty and teh copies cometh out and there is ur wh1te pribledge all 0ver teh 0ffice.
LikeLike
Spite and jealousy as a motivating ideology.
LikeLike
So, when white women behave badly, it’s white men’s fault? That is the ideology of the left. According to the left, the only creatures on the planet with agency is white men. Everyone else has no agency, and therefore cannot be blamed for their actions. It is only white men who can be blamed for anything.
That type of thinking is what got us into this situation in the first place.
Nice job echoing their argument.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s probably true though.
Women have a certain role. They were not allowed into elite universities until the 1970s.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not only a matter of education: Women collectively had no direct POLITICAL POWER, from the invention of politics (a manly thing) until the nineteenth century.
Who gave them that power? Did the waaahmens draw their swords and seize it by force? —Or did they brainwash the poor, stupid, men, who have no agency?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Correct me if I’m wrong (((They))) weaponized out women against us by pushing for the 19th did they not?
And (((theyre))) STILL DOING IT in increasingly more Insidiois ways.
LikeLike
suffrage was mobilized from the same source of elbow grease as abolition
cuckstains. the jews used their own jewish supremacist text against those still clinging to this religion
yes, both of these causes were seen as religious imperatives…we’re all the same under God, so sayeth the king of jews
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is true. White men have the only true agency on the planet, as we developed and spring from the only culture that features independent thought as a feature. Bugmen and collective societies don’t feature individual agency, only conformation.
LikeLiked by 4 people
That is the ideology of the left!? Methinks you suffer a chiral mixup.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re onto something with this. The irony of everything is that nothing seems to get done if white men don’t do it. Feminism, liberalism… all of it is just organized nagging. Everything they say is always “I have this problem; fix it white man.” Have you noticed how feminism never solves anything it just demands that we solve it? Take the “pay gap” for example; the liberal nag is “Hey we’re not making as much money as men. White men should be ‘real men ‘ and change things so that we get paid more and we’re just gonna sit here and throw fits until it changes.”… Instead of just shutting up and working harder.
LikeLike
doesn’t matter whose argument it is, so long as it’s true
2+2 still = 4 even if the devil himself says it
LikeLiked by 3 people
“So, when white women behave badly, it’s white men’s fault? That is the ideology of the left.“
Yes, but only half of the left’s ideology. The other half is “but give us the power anyway”.
Like the left, I believe that only White men have agency, but unlike the left, only White men should hold power.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Women are never responsible for the things men allow them to do.
LikeLike
globalist ad blatantly asking for white women to volunteer in africa
https://www.projects-abroad.org/volunteer-africa/childcare/
LikeLike
Pay $2-3k (is airfare included?) for the privilege of taking pics with authentic African sprogs.
LikeLike
In Africa, they can see the elephants too
LikeLike
Tried to start a similar website called “A Broad Projects” but godaddy dinged me for hate content.
Top notch hate content, mind you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pay $2-3k (is airfare included?) for the privilege of taking pics with authentic African sprogs.
LikeLike
The used-up feminist hags will be surprised when this results in the formation of Einsatzgruppen to cull the herd.
LikeLike
Their Herd Bull is called “The Alpha of State”. The Nation of Settlers created the civilizational foundation for this “Alpha” and the Nation of Immigrants are taking it, claiming “You didn’t build that.” Well, that’s a challenge to raze it to the ground if ever I heard a challenge.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Broads badly need limits and from men who are true to their values.
We revel in exposing libtard hypocrisy. What of our own? I see panegyrics dedicated to “gaming” bar skanks and glorifying “dark triad traits” right next to a post about the Resurrection?
How does that square? Not aware of any sect of Christianity that promotes fornication.
I’m no better. Genuinely envious of guys like GE who have a church that is more power than poz and lives a life consistent to Christian family formation.
On the other end, you’ve got avowed secularists who maintain their moral code. Guys like Trav and Arista seem to have a clear concept of who they are and clearly communicate it.
For all the other bros like me who are stuck in the middle, the struggle is real.
TLDR;
Hypocrisy is the condition of the libtard, but there are plenty in our own camp.
Can’t expect broads to determine their own values. They look to us for that.
LikeLiked by 4 people
For all his fagging about Christianity, a weak Christianity is what allows Trav to operate as hedonistically as he claims.
LikeLike
This Christianity you speak of is almost dead in America at least. The Church culture is more gay than ever. I don’t blame Trav for having the views he has on Christians. I don’t like most of them either.
LikeLiked by 4 people
look dude, i don’t make the fucking rules, I play by them
you can stay “true” to whatever code you believe in, man…my code is God’s Word, aka Evolution.
Fight or die. Struggle, prevail, or become extinct.
If you hitch yourself to a jewish supremacist text with a jewish Head, then, sorry but none of you all should be surprised what happens to you.
LikeLike
Well, as one of those mostly-secular dudes who believes strongly in family and clan as the only stable human social structure, and a potential source of internal strength and even a certain amount of blood-and-soil spiritual fulfillment …
.. the hypocrisy of game posts does stick out like a sore thumb, yes.
However, I don’t make an issue of it in my case because:
1. This is a game blog. I don’t go onto sports blogs and spend hours posting about how dumb it is watching niggers throw a ball around for entertainment, instead of doing ANYTHING to interact with your family, friends, or immediate environment.
2. The game posts are still useful as explorations of human psychology. Even if it’s mostly about the dysfunctional end of said psychology.
3. Not everything can be constant sturm und drang politicking, at least not if one wants to stay sane. Tales of game can provide relief and amusement, provided you take on the role of “amused observer” rather than delving into the deeper implications every time.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hypocrisy? Or a necessary part of a young man’s training so that he may do his part to sire sufficient huwhyte sons to fight the wars to come and daughters to keep the people alive?
LikeLike
Hypocrisy? Or a necessary part of a young man’s training so that he may do his part to sire sufficient huwhyte sons to fight the wars to come and daughters to keep the people alive?
LikeLike
@DMI
Do you know the definition of hypocrisy?
See above.
LikeLiked by 1 person
FE, you’re a bro among bros, but don’t be misled… we Christians still have a rough row to hoe regarding the temptations of the world… and as you can tell ’round chere, my equanimity is not always what it should be, and I don’t always swallow my aggression, even though I usually a shy guy.
“NOOOOOOOOOOO!”
“Yeah, yeah… I admit it.”
LikeLiked by 4 people
It’s clear everyone is misinterpreting what I’ve written.
I hate liars and hypocrisy. That’s it. Know your values and live a life consistent with them. That’s it.
Trav hates Christianity. Views it as an ideology of weakness. So he rejects that weakness and lives a life consistent to that. I’m good with that.
GE views Christianity as a moral code for a community that aids in family formation. He rejects “pua tactics, dark triad glorification, etc.” That rejection makes HIS interpretation of Christianity consistent to his life. I’m good with that as well.
Writing about “game,” banging bar skanks and generally promoting promiscuity flouts central tenets of Christianity. It’s entirely inconsistent to then write about The Resurrection. No idea how anyone can miss that kind of staggering hypocrisy.
MY struggle is also one of wanting it both ways, but I refuse to be willfully blind to my own blatant hypocrisy in that regard. “Lord make me pure- but not quite yet.”
TLDR;
Pick a lane. Secular hedonism or Christian family formation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very important discussion going here so it’s important that we distinguish Game from PUA. These are separate things.
A young man SHOULD Game a woman into a committed long term relationship (most people call it m@rriage) and put bunz in ovenz. And a young man SHOULD continue to Game his w!fe (or LTR) for the duration of their relationship. This is a good thing. (The shit sandwich referred to as modren m@rriage is a whole different chapter.)
Otoh, PUA is degenerative to functioning, stable society. It makes whores and alpha widows and pumped n dumped damaged children (women). This all started many many years ago but it has gotten steadily worse for maybe a century. And for the first time, we’re beginning to get a taste of what kind of havoc that wreaks on society.
Tl;dr: All PUA is Game, but not all Game is PUA.
LikeLiked by 1 person
FE- do not create a false dilemma
you realize there are tons of other religions out there…who told you this one was the truth?
You can rape women and be a good muslim. You can beat them too.
You cannot do these things and be a good christian…it says so right in the BIBLE, Jew 1.0. A text written by jews for jews. The whole thing is jews jewing everyone else and sometimes each other.
A tard like Gayg can make the claim that jesus wasn’t really jewish like that but jewish isn’t judaism, it’s a clan. And that sets aside the old testament which is an ENTIRELY FUCKING JEWISH RELIGIOUS TEXT WRITTEN BY JEWS
why would you believe anything in it? For all we know Sodom and Gomorrah were simply two cities that told jews to go fuck themselves like so many other places did. So the story goes that they were degenerates. Written by…jews.
Why the fuck would you take a jew’s word for this? The jews claim that everyone was sacrificing their babies…again…take a rat kike’s word for anything and the joke is on YOU. They’ve been liars and swindlers since their ORIGINS. A desert nomad war tribe bent on conquering and raping and grifting off everyone since day one…and THEIR moral code is something we want to hold up as how we should live our lives? I think not.
DF these people won’t accept a word in the jew york times or on JNN or mass media, but they swallow the entire gd bible written by the SAME PEOPLE?
It’s asinine. Critical thinking is overridden by their deep NPC kernel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@FastEddie:
That was related to one of my major questions when I came here in February. My actual question was the inverse: Why do some apparently sincere Christians accept it? It took me a bit less than a month to figure it out.
https://wp.me/paK3VJ-Y
By me. Original title: “La raison d’être du Château: Making Masculinity Christian”
(Currently protected; pw is “chateau”, all lowercase, no circumflex. Sorry for the shortlink; (((WP))) seems to not hate it for some reason.)
I have some further thoughts, but no time now. You should have expected that your cogent commentary referencing me would get some reply! I will catch up later.
LikeLike
Tut-tut. Marriage is completely out of the question at this point.
LikeLike
Your inability to understand moral codes that you don’t adhere to is no concern to me. Any state-sanctioned institution is a no-go at this point. Big but, even if you are the mostest alpha male in your town (I am taking personal responsibility on this one.) you will be constantly tempted to cheat. You’re getting text messages as you sleep from 19 year old thots about how sweet your dick must be. It’s going to get to you after a while. Do you want to even put your would-be wife and kids through that?
At this point, Islam has a better chance than Christianity does.
LikeLike
I see it’s still all about me with pasta-boy… go figger.
Honest question, try-hard… how does it feel to be outlearned, outread, outthought, and outphilosophized by a “‘tard”?
“One of my favorite commenters”, sez PA… what say you to this latest antiChrist screed, good Catholic boy?
The company you keep, yeggs… the company you keep.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
you’re none of those things, boomer
dunning kruger is your new nickname
LikeLike
The hell I’m not, pygmy.
LikeLike
Also funny is how you think that “consistency” means anything at all. It doesn’t. An act is either right or wrong. It does not matter who does it. So stop fooling yourself.
You are not right just because you are working within some morally relevant (to you) framework. It may seem right to you as things may seem right to me, but it does not mean that they are. No man can be perfect in what he does. At least I have never seen it happen.
Morality is absolute and therefore must derive from an absolute perfect being as the Law Giver. Nothing your finite brain can imagine is anything close to what perfect sinless God demands.
No matter what you do you will go to Hell unless you are *seen as sinless in God’s eyes. You will never actually be sinless in this life. At least I have never known anyone to be. I guess it’s possible in some way.
LikeLike
FastEddie, I may address myself separately—probably in terms of the Nietzschean principle that the morality of the powerful is self-glorification. All else therefrom follows, including honor, respect for ancestral traditions, and love of posterity: Such things are of the domain of strength; they are only imagined to be otherwise by the Sklavenmoral weaklings who crave a safe, comfortable, mindlessly blissful existence, and cannot imagine courageous acts without external validation.
(For my part, I do think that a “I came not to send peace, but a sword” Christian can be distiguished from a “turn the other cheek” Christian by the internal principles that drive each man’s embrace of religion. Or in religious terms, the Bible is “correctly” interpreted by the man who feels first that he is made in God’s image.)
Whereas it would be unwise to accuse CH of having any principles at all—whether self-generated or otherwise. As I noted in my essay on la raison d’être du Château, published by me on March 5, 2019, linked above:
Now, your own critique harks back to some epic comments by PatrickH and Joe T. over a decade ago. But n.b. that their criticism was not made in Christian terms at all. I have screenshotted some pertinent portions below. At the time, this discussion drove away a regular commentator—an intelligent female—and invoked a frontpage blog post. In ensuing debate (q.v.), from @CH (“editor”), we get such gems as:
—“a woman’s judgment of a man’s worth is the ultimate arbiter.”
—“don’t expect the amoral ugly truths lurking in the sepulchre of our selfish genes to give your moral taxonomies much consideration.”
—[defense of Kurt Cobain on the basis of “his adoring female fans”]
Skimming these old threads, it became clear to me why CH no longer engages his audience in the comments, beyond the occasional snarky annotation. He has only glib ad hominems and rhetorical fallacies; those might work on bar sluts, but will be neatly sliced apart by any intelligent man. Meanwhile, there were some excellent comments (and some moronic ones). @PA thereby made two comments that got “likes” from me—one of them defending (metaphorical or spiritual) kings, of all things; what is this world coming to?
LikeLike
WTF, (((WP)))? Thousand words snipped.
LikeLike
I suspect that (((WP))) threw away my comment, because it was too Polish: I gave some credit to @PA. I even “liked” two of his comments on one of those old threads—what is this world coming to?
Never mind my brief discussion of the nature of morality, CH’s lack of principles, etc.
Now, FastEddie, your own critique harks back to those epic comments by PatrickH and Joe T. over a decade ago. But n.b. that their criticism was not made in Christian terms at all. At the time, this discussion drove away a regular commentator—an intelligent female—and invoked a frontpage blog post. In ensuing debate (q.v.), from @CH (“editor”), we get such gems as:
—“a woman’s judgment of a man’s worth is the ultimate arbiter.”
—“don’t expect the amoral ugly truths lurking in the sepulchre of our selfish genes to give your moral taxonomies much consideration.”
—[defense of Kurt Cobain on the basis of “his adoring female fans”]
Skimming these old threads, it became clear to me why CH no longer engages his audience in comment-debates, beyond the occasional snarky annotation. He has only glib ad hominems and rhetorical fallacies; those might work on bar sluts, but will be neatly sliced apart by any intelligent man. Meanwhile, there were some excellent comments (and some moronic ones).
LikeLike
I suspect that (((WP))) threw away my comment, because it was too Polish: I gave some credit to @PA. I even “liked” two of his comments on one of those old threads—what is this world coming to?
Never mind my brief discussion of the nature of morality, @CH‘s lack of principles, his inability to carry a debate in the comments (which is probably why he now sticks to snarky one-liner annotations), etc.
LikeLike
Gay asf
LikeLike
It’s not that there aren’t any bull’s unwilling to reign in a petulant bitch. There’s just a plethora of badge niggers willing to put a sword into you for a throng of cheering fans in the world arena.
Who wants to martyr themselves for totally unappreciative women? If white knighting won’t get you pussy, why would it would receive cultural adulation?
Do not pass go, get dropped in the deepest darkest hole of some SuperMax or shipped off to some CIA black site in the desert.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. Anglo races seem to be particularly prone to becoming effeminate cucks.
Luckily I’m Latino so it’s all good for me.
I’ll be the bull your women need.
LikeLike
M0d r@pe
I know at least ten single w0men approaching 40 who have been blatant about their feelings for me ..on the border of hara$sment.
These w0men want m@rriage and a k1d.
5 of them know I am taken.
With the firms I work with only about 30% of employees are wh1te men.
The rest are f@gs, w0men and th1rd worlders.
Those wh1te men are all taken. Most are s0y..boys sh@cked up with w0men out of their league who just settled.
It blows my mind how w0men can do that and lived everyday like that. Live with someone you know is inferior.
The hamster obviously rationalizes it.
Wh1te w0men are angry right now
LikeLike
One example, I opened a bank account and the lady at the bank wanted me to ask her out. hara$sment
LikeLike
Also I know buds who have pretty hot EE w0men so that really angers snarky wh1te American w0men. One of the reasons why they h@te Trump I’d say.
I also see a fair amount of WM anth @sian w0men. Way more so than BM/ WW
LikeLike
“One of the reasons why they h@te Trump I’d say”
Do you blame them? Trump mrried three whores. His oldest daughter is the proof in the pudding.
LikeLike
I’ve come to realize that in dealing with anything beyond the home and little kids (where women shine) women’s brains register this of the big wild world:
“shiny things here shiny things everywhere how do i not go to hell [PA aside: they do have a soul] oh look a shiny thing ad shiny things there too so may shiny things and there is a shiny thing there too oh wow another shiny thing [repeat loop]”
That’s regardless of their IQ. That’s even smart based WN women you come across on blogs, who are that way only because they are grounded by a strong man in their life. So put yourself in their shoes: if your entire life was a dizzying flash of shiny bright things and suddenly you’re ugly and alone, you would be angry too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When it comes to human reproduction, women are not even high functioning retards. I can’t count the number of times a 40+ year old woman with a laundry list of advanced degrees has told me that she “would like to have kids some day”. On those rare occasions when I feel it would be amusing to see their reaction to facts, I explain to these women that they are already too late. Their reply is generally something along the lines of “oh, that’s ridiculous. My second cousin Sue had a child when she was 38 and I am only a bit older than her.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I see women all the time who are 40 and want kids “Some day.”
I laugh. Occasionally I go out of my way to heckle them. They’re delusional and need to be mocked as idiots. Maybe they will pass this knowledge on to the next generation, don’t do what I did.
Or maybe not but to hell with them anyway. Fuckin see 30 yos saying want to meet someone to adopt a dog. LOL.
They’re ready to “settle down” at 34…why you ask? Bc nobody wants to fucking date them anymore. They just wanna maybe bang them once and toss em back. And they are approaching the high risk pregnancy wall at 35.
Just talked to the 34yo who brought me over some organic grass fed ribeye last night about this. She took it pretty well…I was like you know that ship has kinda sailed right? She’s heading off to Taiwan for the Foreign service in july…takes visa apps or something for DoS…I’m like ok, you gonna get pregnant this minute? You gonna find a chinese guy over there not hung like a gnat? When you coming back to the USA…she’ll be 35 in May ffs. The ship has sailed.
Only now, at the end, do they understand.
LikeLike
“like to have kids some day”
If you wait 6 more years, The Big & Tall Niglet Store in Malawi is having their 50th anniversary sale.
LikeLike
Damn PA, any wonder why you’re always winning so many COTW. This was a third-eye opener for me; Matrix-style
Also, Shiny Things would be a great title for one of these crusted up chicks’ memoirs
LikeLike
they can’t have a kid at 40
Time Magazine…statistical odds of having a child with your own egg past 40 are less than 10%.
The decline in women isn’t linear; it’s exponential. from 35 to 40 fertility continues to cliff dive and birth defect propensity goes up
how else do you explain these millennials?? The progeny of ancient epigentically damaged boomers and their desiccated eggs and sperm.
Gen X is the generation that was had by young boomers
LikeLike
“Most are s0y..boys sh@cked up with w0men out of their league who just settled.
It blows my mind how w0men can do that and lived everyday like that. Live with someone you know is inferior.
The hamster obviously rationalizes it.”
Thus it has always been. Maybe we worry too much about what we have to do to snag the “best” tail. Most guys—if okay-looking and somewhat-gainfully employed—can lock down an okay chick by midlife, if we’re willing to overlook “pointy elbows” and (at least officially) limit ourselves to banging just one chick.
LikeLike
H-
Explain the Jared Ivanka love connection. He’s got a shiny, never shaved borderline gaypedo “I don’t want to make toys. I want to be a dentist” countenance. And he is reportedly not terribly bright. She’s a babe trust fund kid who could have her pick. And yet she went ((special)) for him.
[CH: lol excellent pop culture ref of rudolph the red-nosed reindeer. to answer your question, she married him because he’s in the real estate biz like her dad, and because his family is loaded.]
LikeLike