Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Beta’ Category

The beatings of cuckservatives shall continue until they self-deliver in a pyre of cleansing sacrifice.

Reader Jarl passes along a story from Norway that is truly vomitous in scope.

This guy may not be a cuckservative but he sure is an idiotic cuck. Just thinking of this Norwegian guy Jorgen Ouren today. Mohammed is now the most common name for men in Oslo. Jorgen Ouren of Statistics Norway said: “It is very exciting”. Perhaps lost in translation, most likely not.

One of the most stupid statement in the last few years.

I traveled across Norway a few years ago. One of those old wooden stave churches has a museum attached to it. The church was hundreds of years old. Within there were photos of congregations from the late 1800’s, early 1900’s. Not Norwegian myself but looking at those faces staring into the camera I felt great affinity with them. Farming people, living hard lives in a harsh climate. Doppelgangers for my own ancestors. Anyways, pathetic how things have turned out for all of us.

“It is very exciting.”

If only that ur-cuck had added the necessary contextual clause.

“It is very exciting to watch Norway’s White population displaced by Middle Eastern lunatics and Norway’s white women raped by the tens of thousands by these vibrant newcomers.”

That’s the thing with race rucks. They ambulate through life sealed in a feels balloon that is easily punctured with a quick slash of the semantic shiv.

On a more (less?) somber note, what the hell is wrong with Scandinavians? Was the fight culled out of them so thoroughly by the loss of their sterner viking brothers to adventures afar that today they LITERALLY welcome their civilization’s cucking on a mass scale?

Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this? I’m open to the possibility of covert biowarfare or an unknown natural parasite infecting and damaging the minds of northern european weak whytes.

***

Commenter Lars Viker (great name, btw) writes,

It’s a really complicated issue, but here goes:

– Only 11% of Norwegians identify as feminists. But the ones who do are very loud and visible. Same goes with political correctness. And it’s becoming less popular and voices are much more frequent than just a decade or two ago, but there has yet to be a real paradigm shift.

– There are plenty of hard guys and feminine women in Norway, they just don’t pose in the media. For example, Norway is the only country that consistently gets more than one olympic gold per million people. Norway, with 5 million people, leads the winter olympics by a mile historically, and usually wins it or ties for first place even today (sure, the whole world doesn’t compete, but Canada, Russia, the US etc. do). Norway’s elite forces are some of the world’s best, and they’re drowning in recruits. Norway’s strongmen and powerlifters are some of the world’s best per capita, although beaten by Iceland (who are almost exclusively emigrated Norwegians). During the nazi occupation, some joined the nazis, and were considered the most fanatical of all the nazi forces, much more than the SS. During the end days of the war, when all was lost, the Wiking brigde wanted to fight until death on the Eastern front. They only unwillingly retreated back to Norway when ordrered by the nazis under penalty of execution.

– Norway is really conform. It scored the highest of all countries in Milgram’s conformity studies. Basically, if leaders decide to say something stupid, there’s a lot less of a chance that someone will object, no matter what the stupidity.

– Outbreeding has affected people. After Norway was christened, marriages within the seventh link (first is your brothers and sisters, second is your cousins etc.) were forbidden. This was done to consolidate power in the hands of a king instead of many clans. Inbreeding creates in-group attitues and ethnocentricity, outbreeding the opposite, extreme altruism.

– Norway was always altruist, but now the altruism has been increased and perverted from the group (Norwegians/Europeans) to include leechers (non working immigrants).

– It’s always been welfare orientated (dwarves have been found to reach old age in the Viking era), but now the welfare state has exploded in size and power.

– Norway has always had a lot of rights for women (rights to inheritance for example), but with feminism that’s been perverted beyond reasonable size too.

– Norway is wealthy, everyone earns a decent wage (or gets money from the state), social security is good, education is free, and there are few problems for most people. It forges a non violent, complacive attitude. War, muscles and guns are expensive. It’s more efficient to produce high technology until shit really starts to get deep. Even if you put together all immigrant crimes, Norway is very peaceful. There are usually around 40 murders a year in the whole country, always less than 1 in 100.000 people. Except for that one year, of course.

***

More from CH’s Scandinavian contingent. Reader Wachtmeister adds,

This isn’t the first time CH ponders about the scandinavian, or Swedish, madness. I have also thought about why my nation behaves this way many a times, and I beleive I have narrowed it down to a few critical points. This post became very long, but I was gonna write it somewhere sometime anyhow.

Anyhow, the reason why we are like this requires historical background and modern analysis.

1. Peace.
War and hard times breeds harder people. This is known. Some here falsely argues that christianity is the reason of the meekness of the west, which is a dumb idea, probably stemming from that hitlequote that if germanics were islamic they would rule the world yada-yada. If anything, europe was never more aggressive than during the heigt of christianity. In the 1600’s alone, there were solely 2 years of absolute peace in Europe. Christianity didn’t end the vikings. Swedes kept crossing the sea to wage war for centuries. Swedish aggressiveness shaped the northern geography of Europe, the warrior-druids of the asatro simply switched to christianity and became warrior-priests (Yes, we had warrior priests). Sweden was ruled by Warrior-kings who unlike most western kings actually fought with their men on the battlefield, like Gustaf Adolf the second who waged the thirty year war (that reduced germanys population by ~30%). Or Karl the 12th, who in the Great northern war alone Sweden fought Denmark, Poland and Russia singlehandedly, and defeated the first two but ended up losing to the Russian winter, a prequel to Napoleon and Nazi germany. Christianity didn’t end the Vikings, Vikings just switched appearance.

However, since 1809 Sweden has been at peace. While, Denmark, Norway and Finland were invaded in the wars of the 20th century Sweden managed to stay neutral by skillfull diplomacy and a humble treaties. Sweden exported its iron ore resources to Nazi germany and let Germany transport troops on its railways. It must be asserted that before WW2 Sweden had closer cultural ties with germany than the anglosaxon west, it was more common to speak german as a second language than english.

This neutrality and cooperation with nazi germany would be used as a tool in the post-war era by the radical left to shame the right and move towards political correctness. In the 1960’s, Sweden was the fourth richest country in the world in total grodd domestic product, NOT COUNTING PER CAPITA, while being one of the smallest population wise. While the rest of Europe was ruined by the war Sweden had profited and was now enduring a golden age, we prevailed in sports (Sweden still has most gold medals per capita in the world), music (Abba, etc), and industry. We had all this money but we gained it trough supporting nazi germany.

The effect is clearly apparent, Out of all the scandinavian nations, Sweden is by far the most politically correct. Sweden takes far more immigration than the other countires per capita, if u think Norway is bad, Swedish journalists portray Norway as backwards racists who won’t embrace multiculture.

Sweden has been at peace of 200 years, and it has rendered us spoiled, ignorant and meek. While the other countries aren’t as bad, compared to a country like poland that lost 30% of its population in WW2 they were relatively untouched by the war. How large islamic immigration do you think Poland have?

2. Long, dark winters

Scandinavia has long harsh winters, a clear environmental difference compared to the rest of Europe. Harsh winters, in opposite to peace, creates hard people (and beautiful) people, though the effect is gone in modern times. Yet it also breeds a empathic, communal, cooperative culture. If the farmer next door has a bad season and is unprepared for the winter, what do you do? You give him some of your proviants, so that he can support you in the future if your harvest would fail, family or not. Harsh winters forced people to cooperate to endure. Take this is indifference to China, which lacks philantropy outside the family. There is always rice somewhere and there are so many people that helping someone and expecting return is asking for parasitism, families who fail to supply themselves cannot blame or expect support from anyone else. Sweden have a history of a very communal, cooperative history.

In fact, the same mechanism is why blonde hair stems from Scandinavia. If you have a harsh winter and food only enough for one of your women to make it trough, you save the one with the golden hair becuase her value is greater. If you have food only for one of your kids and you are blonde, you save the blonde kid becuase there is a greater chance it is your offspring (men can never be 100% sure).

This communal culture has created a strong bond among the Swedes. Gustaf Adolfphus could switch to protestantism relatively easily, as soon as it was established among the king and priests, people followed suit. It is the reason why Sweden was so succesfull at war, Swedish kings could drain more men and drain the economy of the nation more than other nations, creating armies that could count for 5-10% of the total population. When Sweden lost at Poltava, approximately 100,000 people were lost in a country that only included about 2 million people, including Finland.

The long dark winters has worked as a mechanism both for strong evolutionary development and altruistic, communal culture. Swedes follow suit. When political correctness and progressivness hijacked social democracy and became the established ideology, Swedes followed suit.

3. Social democracy and the political class

The two reasons described have another consequence that is worthy of its own point. The communal, altruistic culture combined with long periods of peace made scandinavia a fertile environment for social democracy. In its early days, Social democracy was merely class warfare of the workers done democratically, and they won. Before the war, social democratic politicians were mostly a mix of workers from all over the country, each representing the workers movements at their hometowns. Nation, patriotism, homogenity was praised among these men. As Tage Erlander stated in 1965 in response to the American race riots: “We Swedes live in such a eternally more lucky situation. Our countries people is homogeneus, not only in terms of race but also in many other aspects”

However, the post-WW2 birth of political correctness would create a new generation of politicians, the so called 68-generation. 68 was the peak of socialism, and those students inevitably replaced the old. They did not get their seats becuase they were the most competent, increasingly the power fell to the ones that were best at embracing the already dominant culture, in this case, progressiveness or political correctness. Women were brought in not becuase of their competence, but becuase they were women who claimed to represent other women. The introduction of the TV and mass media gave power to rhetorics and appearance rather than competence and results. Inevitably, the 68 generation would inevitable replace the old, and with it came the cancer.

Most tops in the party these days are there becuase they joined the youth organization at a very young age, started making connections at an early age, or had parents with the connections for them. All they had to do next was embrace the already dominant ideology and they were set. People who chose opposition on the wrong questions were doomed to not have a successfull political career. Me being a student at a world top 100 university, I have friends of friends who are now entering parliament becuase of their parents making them join politics at an early age combined with pure nepotism. These people live far from the ghettos in the most white neighbourhoods, yet embrace mass immigration more than anyone else. The argument is simple, there is war and horror in the world while we live in peace and prosperity, how can we deny refugees?

In the 80’s Sweden received about 30 war refugees from vietnam for integration, that was a big happening at the time. In the 90’s the balkan war started, and suddenly immigration were in the number of thousands. In 2014, we broke the record yet again with 116 00 immigrants, officially. Bear in mind, Sweden only has 10 million people, so a decade of this level of immigration is 10% of our population.

Just like in the US but more so, there is a political class in Scandinavia that has embraced political correctness and “progressiveness” strongly becuase of historical shame and cultural affinity for it. The right has never been as strong, since Scandinavia doesn’t have the same tradition of classical liberalism, and had were smaller countries with a more entrenched scene of democratic class warfare.

Future.

Id like to write this to give some hope. Last month, the Swedish democrats, which youth organization made a very un-apologizing video that CH actually linked last year (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-lAGj_dlQ), became the countries second biggest party in the polls. The current social democratic governments support is plummeting rapidly. 10 years ago they could claim 45% of the voter base, last month they scored 22%. In fact, the nationalist party is already the greatest party among members of the workers union, the LO. Even though every paper and media institutution, including the states insitutution, is unofficially or officially against the nationalist movement, it just keeps growing. Confidence for the journalist and politician proffession have never been lower in the polls.

The swedish people is waking up, and as some people said previously, we swedes are somewhat an all or nothing nation. We have a history and affinity for embracing the dominant ideology and stay togheter. We embraced political correctness more than anyone else.

We can do the opposite, too.

Wealth, peace, and extended outbreeding make a Viking man soft. Really, these environmental changes make any white westerner soft. Is the solution hardship, war, and arranged marriages?

Read Full Post »

Women serve as an exceptionally accurate barometer for the measure of a man’s attractiveness and social standing. The hotter, sweeter, and more feminine a man’s girlfriend or wife, the likelier it is that man is charismatic, beloved, high status, and possessing those traits and achievements which other men admire and set women on fire.

Reader james1 draws a parallel between this truism and current events, in a comment reprinted from a Steve Sailer thread.

From steve sailor comment #27:

I know love can be a fickle thing, but I am sorry, I just can’t have much respect for Jeb over his choice of a wife. The guy was a wealthy man from a prominent family, not some nouveau riche slob. He went to the finest prep school in the nation. Yet according to his mom, Columba was the first gal he dated. From her bio it appears she might even have been an illegal. Yet Jeb fell hook, line and sinker for her. I wonder if it was the extreme differences in their social positions which allowed him the confidence to think him worthy of her? If so he probably couldn’t deal with any woman in his same social level or even a few levels beneath. No, it took an illegal woman for Jeb to feel comfortable.

I’d like to see Heartiste delve into this one.

Columba is powerful evidence of ¡Yeb! Bush’s intrinsic beta maleness. She is homely and culturally antagonistic to the once-majority anglo-germanic country Jeb presumes to lead. Yes, it’s true, given Jeb’s social status and great wealth he could have done a lot better. A LOT. But he settled for a squat inca who can’t even speak English and looks like a rock troll from the movie Frozen. And she was illegal. I absolutely believe Jeb feels like a worthless beta male in his soul and has horrible inner game, and this is why he only felt comfortable dating an illegal alien housemaid who made him seem like a DOMINANT JERKBOY GOD in comparison.

Do you trust a man who has horrible taste in women, and a lack of confidence in his ability to get and keep better women he truly desires? Do you trust a man who, in his choice of woman, lies to himself every second of every day he must gaze upon her apparition?

Do you want a low self-esteem, dumpster diving beta male with zero confidence in his appeal to English-speaking white American women leading your nation back to greatness?

Or an alpha male who, for all his flaws, has proven he knows how to get the job done when it matters?

No further shivving, yerhonner.

Read Full Post »

The Attenuated Romance

The life cycle of the Modern American Romance as told by commenter The Other Anonymous:

I’ve seen it so many times it’s not funny now.

– Beta, has his shit together, but can’t get laid to save his life
– meets a slut
– gets his first blow job after 3rd date
– boom
– drops his friends and hobbies
– before you know it he’s married her

Flash forward a few years – kids, house, divorce – Done.

I disagree with only one thing TOA wrote… it’s still funny.

At which of these dolorous life stages could Game have intervened and saved lives?

Beta, has his shit together, but can’t get laid to save his life

Game teaches betas not to rely on their boring office jobs and steady paychecks to impress girls. Game can help a beta get laid sooner, and with better quality girls, than he otherwise would have under normal game-less operating conditions.

meets a slut

Game gives men choice in the sexual market, reducing the risk of needing to settle for a road-worn slut on the beta bux make.

gets his first blow job after 3rd date

Game, and the increased experience with women, removes some of the mysticism from sex, which has the not-insignificant benefit of protecting beta males from making horrible mistakes on the basis of nothing more than a righteous bj.

boom

Id asplode.

drops his friends and hobbies

Game imbues beta males with the deep, almost spiritual understanding that getting women into bed, and into love, isn’t a miracle that must be canonized, sacralized, and micromanaged to the exclusion of every other nice thing in life. Game also makes a beta male more interesting to his friends, male and female, and thus helps round out his social life.

before you know it he’s married her

Game will help beta males with an eye toward building a family marry from a position of choice, rather than desperation or duty.

Flash forward a few years – kids, house, divorce – Done.

Game will reduce the chances that a beta male will get divorced or, if divorced, get fleeced by a cold-hearted, out-of-love, ex-wife.

Gamespeed, gentlemen!

Read Full Post »

They weren’t born that way, they were made that way, by repeated failure with women in the sexual marketplace. Their romantic failure is a consequence of their inexperience, lack of game, and their poor understanding of female sexual nature, each reinforcing the other in a feedback loop of infinite incel, until marriage at 33 to a dumpy hausfrau (and they are legion).

But there’s another, even crueler and more invidious, reason why beta males become bitter about women:

Women treat beta males worse for no reason other than that they aren’t alpha males!

As we learned from yesterday’s post, a study has found that women who are rejected by an alpha male experience a surge of bitterness and bad feelings that they then dump onto any beta males unlucky enough to be next in line for the faire maidens’ hands.

Now, a question for the tough guys who like to dump on the bitterbetaboys (and CH stands accused along with the sadistic rabble): If women are autonomically treating beta men like shit, through NO FAULT of the beta males’ own, might it stand to reason that a legitimate explanation for beta male bitterness and romantic failure is their parallel sexual market reality in which they have to deal with cranky, bitchy, demeaning women who are pissed off that they didn’t get the alpha male of their dreams? Just sayin’.

Read Full Post »

Beta males regularly commit three mortal sins that banish them to the Hell of Incel. They are listed here. Why are the Big Three Beta Male Sins against love of a mortal nature?

One, the sin involves a grave matter (failure to succeed at the Prime Darwinian Directive).

Two, the sin is often done with full knowledge of the uselessness of the act. Pubertal beta males can be forgiven for their ignorance of female nature, but older beta males have no excuse.

Three, the sin is done with the full consent of the will. Few beta males have ever been coerced or otherwise extorted to behave in ways that kill their chances with girls. He turns off girls all on his own.

Beta Male Mortal Sin #1

DEFENSIVENESS

When beta males are tested by women, their instinct is to crouch into a defensive ball like a cornered kitten, minus the claws and fangs. Defensiveness is the beta male go-to strategy, and it fails spectacularly every single time.

For instance, if a beta male is caught eyeballing another woman, his girl buddy might chastise him with a sneering “You think she’s cute,” in response to which the beta male is likely to apologetically self-renounce something along the lines of “I wasn’t looking at her,” or “Nah, she’s not my type.”

This, naturally, ruins the nascent flirtatious vibe that the girl buddy (and formerly potential girlfriend) was trying to stoke. She will typically respond to her Pyrrhic female victory over the submissive beta male by mentally shoving him deeper into the LJBF confinement zone.

The alpha male, by way of contrast, would reply “Yeah, she’s cute,” and leave it at that. A torrent of vagina tingles are sure to flow.

Beta Male Mortal Sin #2

STRAINING

Straining, or what is colloquially known as try-hardery and more substantively as approval-seeking behavior, is the second romance killer bug in the beta male character code. The straining beta male is the guy whose joke to impress a girl falls flat, who then tries to compensate by emphasizing the point of the joke to a crowd growing increasingly uncomfortable with his inability to ride the wave of his social miscue to a safe landing.

The straining of the beta male is evident in any number of ways: Multiple, lengthy texts to a girl replying once to him with a one-word quip; professing his love to a girl three weeks into a dating cycle; profusely apologizing for slights imagined in his head or concocted in the head of a sadistic woman; m’ladyism run amok; quoting Shakespeare in hopes of arousing a woman he considers his intellectual peer; buying a fresh round of drinks each time he enjoys the warming breeze of a batted, manipulative eyelash; bragging in the most transparently self-serving manner about his accomplishments as an office drone; and, most humorously, sometimes literally chasing after a girl leaving da club, whom he talked with for ten seconds.

Straining is a close cousin of bitterness, which women recoil from at emotional distances that are the square of the distance of the beta male’s pointless crotch to the woman’s turtling labial folds.

Beta Male Mortal Sin #3

PHYSICAL AWKWARDNESS

Hoverhand. An air kiss at the end of a tepid date. A dainty touch on a girl’s shirt sleeve before quickly withdrawing for fear of offense. A hug entered at a bad angle, bodies clashing discordantly. A sweet nothing whispered five feet from a girl’s ear. Body stiffness. Jerky head movements. Darting eyes. Deeply pocketed hands. Shuffling feet. Excessive nodding in approval that is mistaken for true bonding. Relentless smiling. Overeager laughing at a girl’s typically horrid stab at humor.

You’ve seen it in action, (maybe you’ve been prone to the same), the physical awkwardness of beta males is palpable, and palpably desiccating to all vaginas within a ten-mile field of view.

Physical awkwardness is even worse than social awkwardness, for a social misstep can be ignored, retrofitted into a social triumph, or quietly forgotten with the passing of an hour’s worth of masterful romantic interlude. But evidence of a physical discomfort with the boundaries of a woman’s body and heart is an unrecoverable betrayal of anhedonic beta maleness and inexperience bedding, as Amy Schumer, feminist blowhard, might say, “fuckable” girls.

You can get away with a lot of socially obtuse miscues if your body language speaks of the pompetous of love.

***

Almost all beta males share these three mortal vibe-killer sins. One of these sins could deep-six a beta’s chances with a girl; often, a beta male will commit all three sins in the course of a single evening in mixed company.

If you are a beta male who knows he must make penance for his sins against the one holy, catholic, and apostolic Church of Poon, then I have good news for you. Simply ridding yourself of the stain of the Three Beta Male Mortal Sins —

Defensiveness
Straining
Physical Awkwardness

— will pay outsized dividends towards the balance sheet of your love life. Any further spiritual development after that soul cleansing will be gash gravy on an already promising poon vocation.

Read Full Post »

Think girls don’t know about their complicity in creating safe friendzones for beta male orbiters to asexually occupy?

“Bring the movies”, this guy is not. Even his winky emoticon looks beta, like it’s not sure if the wink is too forward and might anger her.

As far as slap-downs of uppity beta males go, this one is hardcore. Combination shit test and pure sadism, an unbiased observer would have a cold heart if he didn’t feel any pity for the hapless beta. And, to be fair, not many men of whatever SMV ranking would be able to agilely parry that uppercunt and come out on top. But we here at CH mold men who are capable of taking on the hardest of ballbusters and turning those hissing broads into purring kittens.

With that in mind, Reader Ronin throws down the gauntlet,

[W]rite in with your best Captain SlapAHo responses to Emily that this guy could give if he weren’t a beta and/or in the LJBF in the first place.

Many commenters gave suggestions.

“you wish”

***

“we’re friends?”

***

I think a neg-reframe is the best way to redirect this ship:

“What was that? Your crotch bulge was distracting me”

***

Radio Silence.

***

the ascii johnson

***

You can’t come up with a good answer to this that’s also congruent with his chat until then. He should have teased her about not using makeup instead of kissing her ass and I’d stay away from asking girls how their day has been. Generally, they will volunteer information if they want to talk about it. Asking people the question he did just shows he doesn’t know what to say or it’s what I make of it.

‘what’s a friend zone? does it have a roller coaster?’

******

A CH similar favorite (perhaps not best suited to this occasion) is:

“You flatter yourself.” (Or “don’t flatter yourself” if you’re dealing with a real temptress requiring a sharper edge.)

All of the suggestions are serviceable, only a couple are particularly good. You can’t go wrong with a “8===>~~~”, or a Birthday Cat. The best suggestion is the neg-reframe, (or as it’s more commonly known, “agree&amplify”). You stand accused of desiring a sup of sweet slit, so why not try refreshing honesty and take her at her word? “Yeah, I’m jizzing in my pants right now thinking about your winning personality.” It’s better than the apologetic alternative, and you have given yourself a chance to turn a female friend into a lover.

Stay away from feigning ignorance about the friendzone (or about your friendship). No chick is gonna buy that act, and you’ll come across try-hard and butthurt. This set-up is difficult for newbs because it’s a real honey trap for betas who are prone to wearing their hurt feelings on their sleeves. That’s why it’s in a post; if you know how to handle the really tough stuff, you’ll glide through the easy pickups.

Yes, this guy started off on the wrong foot. He was two strikes down after he asked her how her day was going (lame) and called her beautiful (lamer). Just about anything he said after that to save face would have seemed incongruent. Given that reality, he may as well try a 180 in his conversational technique and summon his inner jerkboy begging to be released to the wilds. She will balk, naturally, but after a cooling-off period (say, a week), she’d be back, and that’s when he’d finally have a crack at steering their relationship to moister grounds.

What does an inner jerkboy do? He ASSUMES THE SALE.

“Walk me back?”

“Back to that friend zone you just tried to escape from :)”

“You’d like that, wouldn’t you.”

Ultimately it comes down to a choice: Do you want to risk losing a female buddy for a shot at fulfilling your deepest desire with her, or do you want to carry on as a eunuch in her entourage satisfied with the faintest eddies of pleasure that ripple your way when she hangs out with you, always a torturous five feet from your insolent erection?

If the former, then dial up your jerkboy to 11, and tempt a fate that, either way, will be a blessing for you.

Read Full Post »

A beta orbiter white knight.

Some toolbags you just can’t reach. So you get what we have here, which is the way he wants it… well, he gets it… a pat on the blockhead and blue balls for his years of sexless service guarding the ovaries of a girl his sperm will never see.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,301 other followers

%d bloggers like this: