Archive for the ‘Beta’ Category

Reader PA recoils at some dissident elements who are taking the morbid opportunity of Vester Flanagan’s homosexual black-on-white racist murder spree to dump on the victims for their sin of liberal SWPLness.

She was a pretty girl doing human interest stories. She and her three future White children are gone. He was a technician. Let’s wait to do a vicarious touchdown dance when an American Brevik takes care of a senior editor with a track record.

Yeah dumping on Alison Parker (or Adam Ward) doesn’t make any sense at all. She was an attractive SLENDER white woman (a rare commodity nowadays) who, by all accounts, had a feminine personality (even rarer). Her face radiated sweetness.

However, I was listening to the news (big mistake) and I heard her father (confirmed), give a statement to the press that was straight outta the SWPL SJW leftoid equalist playbook — blame guns, don’t mention the 800 pound faggot chimp in the room — that left me feeling utterly despondent that a large fraction of Whites will ever see the light. They will have to be dragged kicking, screaming, and maybe dying, to the truth.

The human ego is that strong. So strong that it can cloud an ideological liberal father’s mind and make him say things which are the equivalent of pissing on his daughter’s fresh grave. I understand that in his inconceivable grief he may not be thinking straight and is giving in to his cultivated compulsion to blame a convenient liberal token of the anti-White hate machine… in this case, guns… for his daughter’s murder. But a healthy White society doesn’t fill the heads of its liberal contingent with abject lies and false narratives so thoroughly that even the murder of a daughter is incapable of shaking her father from his cherished shibboleths.

A healthy White society speaks power to truth. Clear eyes, full hearts, unpolluted minds. In this aspirational society, a liberal White father who feels antipathy to gun owners would not, as his first instinct, lurch to parrot a liberal political agenda to explain away the murder of his lovely daughter by an envious, resentful, white-hating, violent, homosexually imbalanced black male.

Alison Parker’s father is far from the first liberal father of a daughter murdered by a numinous negro to avoid staring into the abyss for the comfort of his ideological purity. He will not be the last.

Until he literally is the last.

With heavy heart, I concede that liberal Whites are simply irredeemable. If a daughter’s sadistically televised and annotated murder by a buttfucking dindu can’t rouse a father, in his crisis moment of uncontrollable rage and grief, to surrender his conspicuously disproven liberal beliefs in a soul-cleansing warrior’s wail of righteous vengeance that honors the memory of his slain child…

then nothing will.

The inevitable logic of rancid ethnomasochism is death. Of the body and of the ego.

There is no other way out, but betrayal of their equalist-drenched anti-principles.

And when has that ever happened?

Read Full Post »


Or, more precisely, less than nothing. She became unhappier.

The husband bent over backwards to fulfill his wife’s every demand, and the result is tragicomically predictable: gina tingles extinguished.

For the past year or so, my husband has ceased to be able to turn me on, to the point where I am almost repulsed by our lovemaking. Recently, I broke down and told him everything. Since then, he has done everything in his power to get us back on track. The problem is now me! Even though this is all I’ve wanted, I can’t bear to be touched in certain areas.

Never mind the couples therapist answer. As per usual for the quality of output typical of this field of inquiry, it’s garbage. A commenter’s sarcastic jab gets it more right: “I love you, but I’m not in love with you.”

Ok, just to torture the CH reading audience, here’s a sample of the couples therapist’s answer (a woman, natch):

This “hot potato” syndrome is not uncommon: one partner has an issue, but once he throws it off, the other catches something too hot to handle. In many ways, it is a good thing that your husband is responding so energetically to your plea for change, and you did an excellent job of moving beyond what had become a long-term impasse.

Yes, clearly what the husband needs to do is more of what didn’t work at all.

For example, you say you don’t like to be touched in certain places, so the exact details of this must be gently communicated to him, and he needs to be shown exactly what you would prefer.

As the feminist sages tell us, women are really turned on by having to read an instruction manual to their men on the proper use of their bodies during lovemaking.

You have done very well so far – be brave enough to address the next steps, which are largely about better communication.

“Better communication” to solve all your relationship problems! Empty platitude, the stock in trade of marriage counselors everywhere. The unhappy wife wrote to the worse-than-useless psychotherapist shell entity informing her STRAIGHT UP that she told her husband everything, and he did everything he could to meet her demands. What part of that suggests this relationship needs to be addressed with “better communication”? Sounds like they were communicating their marriage to an early bed death!

I shouldn’t be surprised anymore, but the alacrity with which marriage and couples counselors and creeeeeeedentialed “psychotherapists” resort to droning bromides devoid of any explicit advice that might prove useful to saving relationships but carries the baggage of gently disturbing the gentle egos of gentle wives with gently feminist views about the moral supremacy of the female prerogative and the assumption of the male’s automatic fault in any scenario stuns even experienced observers of the junk therapist scene such as yours truly.

This couple deserve better advice than what a one Pamela Stephenson Connolly can offer them. CH to the rescue…

To the wife: First, make sure it isn’t some serious physiological issue, like CVD or something that could affect your sexual response. For that, see a medical doctor, i.e. a real doctor. But, odds are it isn’t a medical problem.

The way to bet is that your husband is a beta male — that is, dependable, reliable, generous, deferential… and utterly unsexy — and that his beta maleness got worse the longer your marriage went on. It’s not uncommon for men to get soft in body and attitude once they’ve settled into the marital comfort zone.

If this is the cause of your turtling sexuality, I’m afraid anything you do could only make matters worse. This is because there is a natural disconnect in your female brain between what actually turns you on and what you think SHOULD turn you on. You will, therefore, be unable to give your husband any advice that would work.

To the husband: STOP doing what you’re doing, and do the opposite. Instead of appeasing your wife, ask her to do things for you. No, DEMAND of her those things. Stop supplicating, and instead assume that you are God’s gift to womankind and can do no wrong. Apologize for nothing, make no excuses for her. Be unpredictable. Leave her for a spell, preferably unannounced. Tease her, poke fun at her, squeeze her hip fat with a disapproving glare, flirt with other women as she watches. In sum, initialize the first sequences of Dread Game.

After a few weeks of this wifely romantic reprogramming, grab her when the mood hits you, and start tearing off her clothes, oblivious to her mewls of protest. If your psychological preparations have been successful, she will relent and shake off an orgasm like a dog shitting a peach pit.

If not, consider cutting her loose and saving your newfound self-confidence for another woman who will submit to your love in the way every man secretly desires a woman to do. Even the effete hipster manlets.

Read Full Post »

Spot The Alpha And The Beta

Somebody, probably a girl buddy, asked this group to look over their shoulders and put their hands on their hips for a snap. It’s hard to make this pose work without looking gay.

One man obeys.


One man is busy checking another girl out and can’t be bothered to remove his hand from his girl’s ass.


Any questions?

Yes, you sir.

You still don’t get it?

Ok, try this. It’s a general guide to the good life. A very simple rule that if you follow it religiously will reward you 99 out of 100 times.

Doing what you’re told: BETA.

Doing whatever the fuck you want: .

Stop appeasing girls. They don’t want it, they don’t like it, and they invariably give their sexual favors to men who understand this about them.

Read Full Post »

Although rare, one does occasionally encounter the younger grown man-older woman couple. (I specify “grown man”, because there is room in the sexual market for inexperienced teenage and early 20s beta males to pop their cherries in the easy and uncomplicated, if road-worn, guiding folds of older woman orifice.)

The married younger man-older woman is a coupling that seems to defy not just evolutionary theory but also common sense. Why would a man so ludicrously work against his reproductive interests? There is already a built-in preference among women to date and marry older men than themselves, and a woman’s fertility window is much shorter than a man’s. One would have to be either a fetishist who gets his GILF freak on, or a complete loser lacking any confidence in his ability to marry at least a few boner-inspiring years down the poon market.

While fetishists of every stripe exist, they are so rare — much rarer than the noise their advocates make on SJW comment boards where all that matters is parroting the Pantywaist Line — that it’s safe to compartmentalize them into a box full of Darwinian exceptions who don’t violate the general rule governing sex interactions.

More common are the lesser beta and omega male losers who have so little to offer women, or who believe they have so little to offer, that they settle, with a sad resignation they have spent their lives expertly concealing under self-soothing bromides and plastic smiles from public inquisition, for older broads with short shelf lives and lowered standards.

If the numbers of these loser husband-older wife couples are increasing, (anecdotally, there does appear to be a slight uptick in their numbers, mirroring the slight uptick in the numbers of white women-black men couples. I invite the reader to make the relevant connection), we can identify a number of social changes that may be contributing to the odd pairings.

Reader corvinus explains,

CH: and then marry, if he wishes to marry, a younger woman.

This. About 10 years younger.

As to why it’s considered the norm to marry a woman the same age as you, I have a couple of ideas:

1) Social pressure, especially from the women.
2) Online dating, which has a stronger age-homogamy bias than IRL.
3) Lack of game on the men’s part.

Interestingly enough, apparently during the recession, the age at first marriage has gone up faster for men than for women, suggesting that women are more willing to consider marrying somewhat older men than they were before.

During times of economic hardship, women smartly choose established men with more resources (betas). The inverse is also true: during times of female economic self-sufficiency, women vaginally choose charming jerkboys with or without resources.

Corvinus has hit on the big three reasons why younger man-older women marriages continue to exist and offend good taste.

Social pressure is a big deal, because women are the lemming sex and bend to the will of the group more readily than do men. If more older women are getting locked out of the chase for older, resource-rich men, then they will seek succor from their misery by propagandizing the wonderful wonderfulness of fucking younger men in short-term flings. (We here at CH know better. These women hurt badly on the inside.) The lies of feminism can have an impact on how socially comfortable women feel about dating older men.

Online dating does create a sex market skew against the intangibles of courtship. That is, women who try to find a man exclusively online will subconsciously bias the crude, artless markers of a man’s SMV — his listed age and profile pic — at the expense of the complex, refined cues of his seductive prowess (amply explored in the CH archives). Luckily, there are plenty of smooth moves a man can execute to evade this age-homogamy bias of online dating.

Lack of game. This is the big pink tuna. In my travels around the world of women, I’ve come to observe that younger man-older woman relationships are invariably of four kinds:

– The older woman was preternaturally attractive and slender, and competing in a local market filled with chubby younger women and off-the-market married men. In this milieu, an older woman (but not too much older) will capture the interest of younger unmarried men fed up with the feeding schedules of their female peers.

– The younger man was a beta male to the core. This is the explanation for 90% of younger man-older woman marriages. You take a lesser beta with little experience bedding women, add an older, sexually aggressive broad with her talons out for contractually locking down an indentured servant a husband, and you’ve got a combustible situation the beta has no hope of exerting any control over its direction. These couples flout natural law because the beta male has few sexual market options, or believes in his heart he has few options. Scarcity mentality is the soulkiller of masculinity.

– The younger man was black, the older woman a flabby white. For biomechanical reasons I don’t feel like hammering into submission yet again, it is an observable fact that black men are simply more tolerant of SMV hideousness in the women they screw, and this goes double when black men date white women. A black man will spear white land whales or go down on the wrinkled vag flaps of old white women that no white man would touch.

– The older woman was rich. Many of the younger men in these relationships are closeted gays on the psychopathy spectrum.

tl;dr: There’s a reason we feel an emotional swell of harmoniousness when we see older man-younger woman couples, and we feel a jolt of emotional discomfort when we see the opposite.


I forgot to mention sex ratio skew as a potential cause of increased younger man-older woman marriages. In a prime nubility market in which men outnumbered (against the historical average) the available hot young minxes, there would be immense pressure at the younger male margins to tragically settle for older women who are the sexual and/or marital discards of older alpha men in the process of trading up to younger lovers. An ahistorical sex ratio skew can introduce plenty of tumult and “black swans” into the normal functioning of the sexual market.

Read Full Post »

…and the results cause the men to burst into tears.

Via his poasting career, one of the funniest stories I’ve read this year.

After all of the usual caveats (unemployed T levels higher than employed T levels, testosterone does not correlate with success, etc) and complete blackout of obvious confounding bix noody variables we get to the point:

It turns out that the gay Jew has the highest testosterone level at 274. The other four men are clustered around half of that (144)

“In general, the normal range in males is about 270 to 1070 ng/dL with an average level of 679 ng/dL. A normal male testosterone level peaks at about age 20, and then it slowly declines.”

144. Male shitlibs are LITERALLY low T manlets.

One thing that jumped out at me, though, was the longing for normalcy. The two of the three women wanted to be low testosterone and feminine. The (almost uniformly whiny) straight(ish) men wanted to be high T. Even in the heart of poz. As creeped out as I was by the entire segment, I managed to extract a tiny grain of hope.

Hope or not, though, after listening to this segment I needed to move leg day up to lift away the poz.

Biomechanics is God, and He rules over even self-deluding shitlibs.

Lift away the poz. gentlemen. Your balls will grow three sizes with every new 1 rep max at the squat rack. Then you can enjoy the whiny spectacle of a sniveling, sneering leftoid disingenuously snark about why you want White men to be more aggressive like black men.

Read Full Post »


It will be morning in America when these low T manlets like Erickson and Rod Dreher are washed from the system for good. The country’s had enough of gutless pansies throwing their dresses over their heads every time they hear a naughty word or a dose of realtalk.



Jonah Fatberg, the amorphous cuckservative blob who loved throwing around the “cheese-eating surrender monkeys” insult, has been reduced to playing the “how wude!” card against The Trumpening. That’s all he and his kind have left: appeals to politeness. The “how wude!” card is the last hand of the weasel who has suddenly found himself the target of hate he himself has dished out for years.

Well, CH don’t play by Goldberg’s rules. Fuck off, fat boy. The front lines are everywhere now.


First post-debate poll finds Trump holding his lead over the little GOP girls in grown men’s bodies.


Commenter McGonzo quotes Jonah Fatberg, proving beyond a doubt Fatberg’s disingenuous cuckservative bona fides.

Fatberg: “Are we really going to go down the insane path of saying that real conservatives must abandon good manners and respect for women to demonstrate their purity?”

Versus constantly apologizing and atoning for the unforgivable sins of being a straight, rich, white, male married to a babe?

Check out that “respect for women” canard Fatberg throws out there along with his stinky red herring about “demonstrating conservative purity”. One, respect must be earned. MegYn Kelly’s grrlpower interrogation was an obvious hit job on Trump. She was ordered by higher-ups to take him out, so she went with the radioactive “war on women” smear so beloved by leftoid equalists. A totally insubstantial slander that added nothing to the debate or raised any pressing issues. Never mind that there are people, men and women, deserving of richly textured insults, Fatberg wants you to think politeness is the core tenet of the conservative philosophy.

Two, no anti-cuckservative Trump supporter said anything about “conservative purity.” Most dissident rightists know Trump is far from a pure conservative. That’s not why they support him against the wishes of the entire Hivemind apparatus. Trump is supported because he’s right, or more right than any other cuck, on the national question — unlimited immigration and demographic dispossession of the native Whites — and because he’s got balls and doesn’t immediately lick the taint of liberals when they throw SJW tantrums at him.

But obviously Fatberg knows nothing of balls, having surrendered his completely when NR purged the only interesting realtalkers they had writing for that recipe swapping rag.


In related news, Bernie Sanders got a taste of the vibrancy he champions while normally stationed safely at his 98.7% White state of Vermont.

:lol: Cuckservatives like Fatberg will tell you Sanders deserves this howler monkey mobbing because LIEBRULS are the REAL RACISTS.

Read Full Post »

The beatings of cuckservatives shall continue until they self-deliver in a pyre of cleansing sacrifice.

Reader Jarl passes along a story from Norway that is truly vomitous in scope.

This guy may not be a cuckservative but he sure is an idiotic cuck. Just thinking of this Norwegian guy Jorgen Ouren today. Mohammed is now the most common name for men in Oslo. Jorgen Ouren of Statistics Norway said: “It is very exciting”. Perhaps lost in translation, most likely not.

One of the most stupid statement in the last few years.

I traveled across Norway a few years ago. One of those old wooden stave churches has a museum attached to it. The church was hundreds of years old. Within there were photos of congregations from the late 1800’s, early 1900’s. Not Norwegian myself but looking at those faces staring into the camera I felt great affinity with them. Farming people, living hard lives in a harsh climate. Doppelgangers for my own ancestors. Anyways, pathetic how things have turned out for all of us.

“It is very exciting.”

If only that ur-cuck had added the necessary contextual clause.

“It is very exciting to watch Norway’s White population displaced by Middle Eastern lunatics and Norway’s white women raped by the tens of thousands by these vibrant newcomers.”

That’s the thing with race rucks. They ambulate through life sealed in a feels balloon that is easily punctured with a quick slash of the semantic shiv.

On a more (less?) somber note, what the hell is wrong with Scandinavians? Was the fight culled out of them so thoroughly by the loss of their sterner viking brothers to adventures afar that today they LITERALLY welcome their civilization’s cucking on a mass scale?

Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this? I’m open to the possibility of covert biowarfare or an unknown natural parasite infecting and damaging the minds of northern european weak whytes.


Commenter Lars Viker (great name, btw) writes,

It’s a really complicated issue, but here goes:

– Only 11% of Norwegians identify as feminists. But the ones who do are very loud and visible. Same goes with political correctness. And it’s becoming less popular and voices are much more frequent than just a decade or two ago, but there has yet to be a real paradigm shift.

– There are plenty of hard guys and feminine women in Norway, they just don’t pose in the media. For example, Norway is the only country that consistently gets more than one olympic gold per million people. Norway, with 5 million people, leads the winter olympics by a mile historically, and usually wins it or ties for first place even today (sure, the whole world doesn’t compete, but Canada, Russia, the US etc. do). Norway’s elite forces are some of the world’s best, and they’re drowning in recruits. Norway’s strongmen and powerlifters are some of the world’s best per capita, although beaten by Iceland (who are almost exclusively emigrated Norwegians). During the nazi occupation, some joined the nazis, and were considered the most fanatical of all the nazi forces, much more than the SS. During the end days of the war, when all was lost, the Wiking brigde wanted to fight until death on the Eastern front. They only unwillingly retreated back to Norway when ordrered by the nazis under penalty of execution.

– Norway is really conform. It scored the highest of all countries in Milgram’s conformity studies. Basically, if leaders decide to say something stupid, there’s a lot less of a chance that someone will object, no matter what the stupidity.

– Outbreeding has affected people. After Norway was christened, marriages within the seventh link (first is your brothers and sisters, second is your cousins etc.) were forbidden. This was done to consolidate power in the hands of a king instead of many clans. Inbreeding creates in-group attitues and ethnocentricity, outbreeding the opposite, extreme altruism.

– Norway was always altruist, but now the altruism has been increased and perverted from the group (Norwegians/Europeans) to include leechers (non working immigrants).

– It’s always been welfare orientated (dwarves have been found to reach old age in the Viking era), but now the welfare state has exploded in size and power.

– Norway has always had a lot of rights for women (rights to inheritance for example), but with feminism that’s been perverted beyond reasonable size too.

– Norway is wealthy, everyone earns a decent wage (or gets money from the state), social security is good, education is free, and there are few problems for most people. It forges a non violent, complacive attitude. War, muscles and guns are expensive. It’s more efficient to produce high technology until shit really starts to get deep. Even if you put together all immigrant crimes, Norway is very peaceful. There are usually around 40 murders a year in the whole country, always less than 1 in 100.000 people. Except for that one year, of course.


More from CH’s Scandinavian contingent. Reader Wachtmeister adds,

This isn’t the first time CH ponders about the scandinavian, or Swedish, madness. I have also thought about why my nation behaves this way many a times, and I beleive I have narrowed it down to a few critical points. This post became very long, but I was gonna write it somewhere sometime anyhow.

Anyhow, the reason why we are like this requires historical background and modern analysis.

1. Peace.
War and hard times breeds harder people. This is known. Some here falsely argues that christianity is the reason of the meekness of the west, which is a dumb idea, probably stemming from that hitlequote that if germanics were islamic they would rule the world yada-yada. If anything, europe was never more aggressive than during the heigt of christianity. In the 1600’s alone, there were solely 2 years of absolute peace in Europe. Christianity didn’t end the vikings. Swedes kept crossing the sea to wage war for centuries. Swedish aggressiveness shaped the northern geography of Europe, the warrior-druids of the asatro simply switched to christianity and became warrior-priests (Yes, we had warrior priests). Sweden was ruled by Warrior-kings who unlike most western kings actually fought with their men on the battlefield, like Gustaf Adolf the second who waged the thirty year war (that reduced germanys population by ~30%). Or Karl the 12th, who in the Great northern war alone Sweden fought Denmark, Poland and Russia singlehandedly, and defeated the first two but ended up losing to the Russian winter, a prequel to Napoleon and Nazi germany. Christianity didn’t end the Vikings, Vikings just switched appearance.

However, since 1809 Sweden has been at peace. While, Denmark, Norway and Finland were invaded in the wars of the 20th century Sweden managed to stay neutral by skillfull diplomacy and a humble treaties. Sweden exported its iron ore resources to Nazi germany and let Germany transport troops on its railways. It must be asserted that before WW2 Sweden had closer cultural ties with germany than the anglosaxon west, it was more common to speak german as a second language than english.

This neutrality and cooperation with nazi germany would be used as a tool in the post-war era by the radical left to shame the right and move towards political correctness. In the 1960’s, Sweden was the fourth richest country in the world in total grodd domestic product, NOT COUNTING PER CAPITA, while being one of the smallest population wise. While the rest of Europe was ruined by the war Sweden had profited and was now enduring a golden age, we prevailed in sports (Sweden still has most gold medals per capita in the world), music (Abba, etc), and industry. We had all this money but we gained it trough supporting nazi germany.

The effect is clearly apparent, Out of all the scandinavian nations, Sweden is by far the most politically correct. Sweden takes far more immigration than the other countires per capita, if u think Norway is bad, Swedish journalists portray Norway as backwards racists who won’t embrace multiculture.

Sweden has been at peace of 200 years, and it has rendered us spoiled, ignorant and meek. While the other countries aren’t as bad, compared to a country like poland that lost 30% of its population in WW2 they were relatively untouched by the war. How large islamic immigration do you think Poland have?

2. Long, dark winters

Scandinavia has long harsh winters, a clear environmental difference compared to the rest of Europe. Harsh winters, in opposite to peace, creates hard people (and beautiful) people, though the effect is gone in modern times. Yet it also breeds a empathic, communal, cooperative culture. If the farmer next door has a bad season and is unprepared for the winter, what do you do? You give him some of your proviants, so that he can support you in the future if your harvest would fail, family or not. Harsh winters forced people to cooperate to endure. Take this is indifference to China, which lacks philantropy outside the family. There is always rice somewhere and there are so many people that helping someone and expecting return is asking for parasitism, families who fail to supply themselves cannot blame or expect support from anyone else. Sweden have a history of a very communal, cooperative history.

In fact, the same mechanism is why blonde hair stems from Scandinavia. If you have a harsh winter and food only enough for one of your women to make it trough, you save the one with the golden hair becuase her value is greater. If you have food only for one of your kids and you are blonde, you save the blonde kid becuase there is a greater chance it is your offspring (men can never be 100% sure).

This communal culture has created a strong bond among the Swedes. Gustaf Adolfphus could switch to protestantism relatively easily, as soon as it was established among the king and priests, people followed suit. It is the reason why Sweden was so succesfull at war, Swedish kings could drain more men and drain the economy of the nation more than other nations, creating armies that could count for 5-10% of the total population. When Sweden lost at Poltava, approximately 100,000 people were lost in a country that only included about 2 million people, including Finland.

The long dark winters has worked as a mechanism both for strong evolutionary development and altruistic, communal culture. Swedes follow suit. When political correctness and progressivness hijacked social democracy and became the established ideology, Swedes followed suit.

3. Social democracy and the political class

The two reasons described have another consequence that is worthy of its own point. The communal, altruistic culture combined with long periods of peace made scandinavia a fertile environment for social democracy. In its early days, Social democracy was merely class warfare of the workers done democratically, and they won. Before the war, social democratic politicians were mostly a mix of workers from all over the country, each representing the workers movements at their hometowns. Nation, patriotism, homogenity was praised among these men. As Tage Erlander stated in 1965 in response to the American race riots: “We Swedes live in such a eternally more lucky situation. Our countries people is homogeneus, not only in terms of race but also in many other aspects”

However, the post-WW2 birth of political correctness would create a new generation of politicians, the so called 68-generation. 68 was the peak of socialism, and those students inevitably replaced the old. They did not get their seats becuase they were the most competent, increasingly the power fell to the ones that were best at embracing the already dominant culture, in this case, progressiveness or political correctness. Women were brought in not becuase of their competence, but becuase they were women who claimed to represent other women. The introduction of the TV and mass media gave power to rhetorics and appearance rather than competence and results. Inevitably, the 68 generation would inevitable replace the old, and with it came the cancer.

Most tops in the party these days are there becuase they joined the youth organization at a very young age, started making connections at an early age, or had parents with the connections for them. All they had to do next was embrace the already dominant ideology and they were set. People who chose opposition on the wrong questions were doomed to not have a successfull political career. Me being a student at a world top 100 university, I have friends of friends who are now entering parliament becuase of their parents making them join politics at an early age combined with pure nepotism. These people live far from the ghettos in the most white neighbourhoods, yet embrace mass immigration more than anyone else. The argument is simple, there is war and horror in the world while we live in peace and prosperity, how can we deny refugees?

In the 80’s Sweden received about 30 war refugees from vietnam for integration, that was a big happening at the time. In the 90’s the balkan war started, and suddenly immigration were in the number of thousands. In 2014, we broke the record yet again with 116 00 immigrants, officially. Bear in mind, Sweden only has 10 million people, so a decade of this level of immigration is 10% of our population.

Just like in the US but more so, there is a political class in Scandinavia that has embraced political correctness and “progressiveness” strongly becuase of historical shame and cultural affinity for it. The right has never been as strong, since Scandinavia doesn’t have the same tradition of classical liberalism, and had were smaller countries with a more entrenched scene of democratic class warfare.


Id like to write this to give some hope. Last month, the Swedish democrats, which youth organization made a very un-apologizing video that CH actually linked last year (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-lAGj_dlQ), became the countries second biggest party in the polls. The current social democratic governments support is plummeting rapidly. 10 years ago they could claim 45% of the voter base, last month they scored 22%. In fact, the nationalist party is already the greatest party among members of the workers union, the LO. Even though every paper and media institutution, including the states insitutution, is unofficially or officially against the nationalist movement, it just keeps growing. Confidence for the journalist and politician proffession have never been lower in the polls.

The swedish people is waking up, and as some people said previously, we swedes are somewhat an all or nothing nation. We have a history and affinity for embracing the dominant ideology and stay togheter. We embraced political correctness more than anyone else.

We can do the opposite, too.

Wealth, peace, and extended outbreeding make a Viking man soft. Really, these environmental changes make any white westerner soft. Is the solution hardship, war, and arranged marriages?

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,326 other followers

%d bloggers like this: