Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Biomechanics is God’ Category

Commenter Karl Marx (fitting) wonders if sexual shame is the real reason why good-looking men with no Game fail with women.

Are you not conflating mental problems with no game? Most good looking guys who can’t get laid have some sort of mental hangup. If parents embed deep sexual shame into their sons no amount of PUA tactics can save a man.

Garden-variety introversion and dullness are common afflictions and not indicative of “mental hangups”. Sexual shame is a useless Freudian concept that has almost no basis in reality outside of weird religious communities and mentally ill autogynephilic trannies.

You go to great lengths about the effectiveness of shaming women, fat people but consider sexual shame “no basis in reality”?

Shaming “women”? No, shaming “fat women”. And the reason is obvious: fat kills romance dead. But I have never met a man who did poorly with women because he had some deep-seated “sexual shame”. That’s not how it goes for the vast majority of men who have trouble getting women. Just the opposite really; men have NO sexual shame and a great desire to FULFILL their sexual craving, but lack the courage and acumen to satisfy their lust. The tension between their sexual SHAMELESSNESS and their sexual FAILURE is what causes them to swallow black pills by the mouthful and grasp discredited Freudian gobbledygook to rationalize their incel torment.

How you are treated throughout your childhood affects you your whole life.

Hm, a loaded statement that, while containing nuggets of truth, has come under fire from geneticists who haven’t located any strong correlation between shared environment and life outcome. The evidence appears to be heading in the direction of genes piloting the ship of fate, with environment (parents and peers) playing a smaller role as co-pilot.

Anyhow, social shaming of boys will never be powerful enough to override their later sexual desires. Like I said, most men aren’t deviants acutely ashamed of their insolent boners. What they are is supplicating, fearful dullards who place pussy on the pedestal thinking that will help them get laid, and yes that should be shamed by better men who know it’s not what women want.

Read Full Post »

There’s a lot of discussion about the Hajnal Line within the HBD and Maul-Right wokeweb, and rightly so because it’s an important concept and theoretical framework which goes a long way to explaining our current scourge of pathological altruism afflicting Anglosphere Whites. That in mind, I offer a succinct primer on Hajnalianism for any readers who are unfamiliar with the idea.

Enfant Terrible asks,

What’s a East-hajnalian?

It refers to any White European born and raised outside of the Hajnal Line, a geographic boundary that roughly separates Northwest Europe from South and East Europe based on historical patterns of out-group altruism (ie cuckery) that likely evolved under selective pressure from a variety of sociocultural inputs and that has now become pathologically suicidal in the modern environment of rapid intercontinental travel and social media-fueled virtue signaling status arms races.

The Hajnal Line may be the key that explains every insane leftoid subversion of Western White nations that we see unfolding today.

Hope this helps.

Read Full Post »

The Bigly Epigone has done a yeolord’s job compiling demographic data on voting patterns in the 2016 national election. Barring a couple of surprises, the data confirm what we in the wokentariat already know about our tooth-and-claw Diversitopia and its consequences for the continued survival of the nation.

One of the highest IQ groups — single Jewish women — voted in nearly the same overwhelming number for Hillary “thecunt” Clinton as did one of the lowest IQ groups — black single mothers, (88% and 97%, respectively). Only “black women” and “black single mothers” had a lower Trump-vote share than did single Jewesses.

This voting data provides evidence for my observation that no group has a greater disconnect between their practiced lifestyles and signaled virtues than do Jewish women. Jews are perhaps the most hypocritical group in America today. Call it anti-semitism if it makes you feel assuaged, but it’s what the real world is telling us.

Also, for any cucked con who thinks there’s a groundswell of “natural conservatives” among nonblack nonWhites and sexual deviants just waiting to storm national elections if the GOPe supplicates hard enough, here are the depressing facts:

TRUMP VOTE SHARE

homos: 20.7%
muslims: 28.4%
hispanics: 32.2%
hindus: 34%
asian women: 33.7%
asian men: 40.7%

Demography is destiny.

The biggest Trump supporters?

White Protestants (68%)
Married White Protestants (70.6%)
Mormons (71.6%, the beeg weiner)

Trumperica is basically Heritage America plus the Wonder Bread of Whites, Mormons.

Which brings us to Surprise #1: Trump’s vote share among single Jewish men was 35.9%, more than three times the number of single Jewish women Trump voters. And among married Jews, an astounding 58.8% majority of married Jewish men voted for Trump! (The corresponding Trump share number for married Jewish women was 42.9%.)

So before we finger all the blame for our nation’s decline on Jews, it’s a good idea to remind oneself that 6 in 10 married Jewish men have boarded the same Trump Train as the goyim. Now we know why all those Jewish men who have enough on the ball to be marriageable like to marry shiksas….they can’t stand their own women’s feminist kvetching.

Which brings us to (Sorta) Surprise #2. Audacious E and Steve Sailer stress that the real dividing line is, and continues to be, marrieds versus unmarrieds rather than women versus men. I wonder though if AE & SS haven’t missed what I consider the most telling demographic Trump vote share revelation. As anonymous over at Sailer’s comments,

Which of these things is not like the others?

Single white women: 39.0
Married white women: 61.4
Single white men: 59.0
Married white men: 61.0

That’s peculiar (not). There’s one glaring outlier to the pro-Trump voting trend among Whites, and it isn’t the generic “unmarried Whites”. It’s “single White women”. Single White men voted for Trump in almost the same numbers as did married White men. Our traitorous, thecunt-loving, Trump-hating Whites are predominately SINGLE WHITE WOMEN. We are betrayed by the sobbingly empty wombs and cock-carved twat tubes of the libarts and salty tarts crowd. Honestly, we all should have seen this betrayal cumming. Single White women have politically (and even socially and sexually) morphed into nonWhites, seeing the government as a substitute beta male provider who doesn’t demand much in return (sex) and lets them slut it up with sexy cads.

So it’s more accurate to say the real dividing line in American politics, at least among Whites, is single White women versus all other Whites.

And from personal anecdote, I can tell you this is true. I have heard more than one single White woman gripe about how her mom or dad or both voted for Trump and she just couldn’t understand what they were thinking.

I can tell her what her parents were thinking about: the future. Single White women have apparently forgotten what the future of their homeland should resemble, or that a future even exists.

***

Update: jackmcg makes a good point about that anomalously high married Jewish men vote share for Trump.

Jewish men didn’t vote majority Trump. Lol. Please.

Most Jewish men will claim they are ATHEIST or NON-RELIGIOUS in these polls.

Sure, religiously identifying Jewish men voted slightly majority Trump. 58% is still paltry though.

This happens all the time, yo. An exit poll that shows Jews voted pro-White ALWAYS leads back atheist Jews claiming they’re not Jews.

Yes, the “married Jewish men” demographic is misleading because it’s probably capturing those Jewish men who still identify as Jewish, rather than as unaffiliated, atheist, or non-religious. This means that data point is likely a snapshot of Orthodox Jewish support for Trump, which was already well-known. The problem is that, though they have a higher birth rate than secular Jews, Orthodox Jews are a minority of Jews in America, and an even smaller influence culturally. Overall Jewish secular support, both married and unmarried, is heavily tilted toward thecunt and her Democreep Party. Secular Jews really do vote like Puerto Ricans and live like WASPs.

The quadumvirate of nation-destroying demographics is therefore: Jews, single White women, homos, and nonWhites. As it ever was (except in Israel).

And don’t expect this trend to reverse or even slow down. As long as the White marriage rate continues falling and the age of first marriage continues rising, the numbers of single White bitterbitches in the population will explode, and with their growing numerical electoral power the decline and death of America is sure to follow.

Make America Great Again (MAGA) should be closely paired with Who Bitch This Is (WBTI), if we seek the salvation of our country.

Read Full Post »

Reader _svd comments about the changes in his life after a tumor caused his T to crash.

I’m a guy who’ve been born with high T, got a benign tumor that plummeted my levels of both T AND E at my late teens, and only found out about it and fixed it 15 years latter.

Handsome, nice body, smart, charismatic, good sense of humor. High-earner from early 20s. Work 4 hours a day. Eastern European (so, tough upbringing).

From the list above, everything re work ethics does not apply to me – always was “get the shit done” kind of guy. Good high-flying career in small high-value businesses with no corporate BS. Never was afraid of applying or receiving violence (but then I’m EE). I’ve also got through STEM with no problems. Hate ballbusters and feminists.

That’s what 100% true:
* no sex attraction. At all. To the point of complete celibacy for years – no interest in girls. Function was there, and very decent (last for long, recharge fast, though enjoyed the foreplay more than actual sex), but quick fap felt better to release pressure. And that’s what sex was about: releasing pressure. Started dating out of sense of loneliness. Women had to initiate sex when she wanted it (they usually did, as on the outside I’m Mr. Right from romance novels).
* total blindness toward any signals from women. They just don’t register.
* no interest toward team sport. I love boxing though, and ran daily sparrings for a decade. No problem with being competitive or dominant in work setting.
* never owned a car (but you don’t really need one in Europe). Always was irrelevant to cars.
* good erection required fetish. Mine was D/s on D side.
* facial features softened (and started changing back surprisingly fast with T levels restored). No facial hairs at 30 (again, fixed with T – although it was convenient). No problem with nose, ears or other body parts.

One more: depression as a norm of life. Suicide intentions for years. That fueled passive attitude toward the world and may have been seen like weakness.

Ask questions if interested.

Other effects of low T on a nation’s men:

  • leftist politics
  • vocal fry
  • uptalk
  • esssra klein
  • manboobs
  • john scalzi
  • beta orbiting
  • grinding incel
  • male feminists
  • experimental homosexuality
  • bad taste in, well, everything
  • androgyny in look and attitude
  • cuckoldry and miscegenation
  • marathon running
  • carbface
  • interracial adoption
  • anti-trumpism
  • open borders
  • antifa
  • vidgya gaming-induced deep vein thrombosis
  • protruding nipples (very disrespectful)
  • anal play and anal play accessories
  • math class is hard
  • intersectionality
  • shia lapoofter
  • fake news
  • NPR
  • tranny “rights”
  • butt-kicking babes
  • equalism
  • haven monahan (and other fake rape fantasies)
  • patton oswalt
  • talmudic sophistry
  • barack obama
  • hypocrisy
  • disloyalty
  • snark
  • censorship
  • literal bending over backwards for invading hordes of higher fertility ingrates
  • social justice posturing
  • “toxic masculinity” (the irony)

As you can see, chronically low T on both the individual and societal level is almost entirely downside. Bullying decreases. Maybe you could call that an upside. I wouldn’t.

Read Full Post »

This is a sad story. I don’t intend any mean-spiritedness by telling you all this story. My shiv is sheathed. My purpose in passing along this real life anecdote is to expose the heartlessness of the sexual market so that you and those you love can know the monster who stalks you till the end. You won’t defeat this monster, but you can avoid accidentally stepping into its maw before your time.

A lanky White woman hit on me once. She was thin, but ugly. At the time, I rebuffed her plausibly-concealed solicitation. Over the months that followed, I would see her occasionally, here and there, around our itty bitty city, usually alone or working at a service job. The months turned into a few years. Still, I would catch glimpses of her every so often, working different low-pay service jobs.

I left the city, but my travels would take me back there sometimes, for month-long stays. Again, and weirdly coincidental, I saw her about town. And again, she was working in the service industry. Job-hopping from one middling wage outpost to another had become her lifestyle. Still ugly, but now older too.

In all these incidental path-crossings, I’d sometimes catch a look of recognition sweep across her face, but not always. I nonetheless pretended not to recognize her.

I would always feel sad when I saw her, because I knew if she were more attractive her life would be very different. A man of means would have scooped her up years ago, rescued her from that wage slave crush of unmarried despair, and given her the life so many women dream about as little girls. The house, the yard, the children, the comfort, the sense that the future is safe and secured and she is loved….all of it would have been hers if the God of Biomechanics had been more generous to her when the spark of life was breathed into her earthly story.

No pretty girl suffers the indignities of the callous job market for long. Men value female beauty so much they will bend metal with their minds if it can give them a hot girlfriend or wife. To rescue a fetching minx from soulkilling drudgery and sweep her into the good life is in fact many men’s fantasy.

If the woman of my anecdote were prettier, she could be that happy effervescent lady from the suburbs who picks up her coffee and pities the poor sub-prime ugly woman behind the counter taking her payment.

In the final abacus, sometimes all the difference between hell and heaven is a few millimeters of facial bone structure.

I can never stop forgetting this banal, gutter-bound ugly truth, which is why, even in my sincerest moments of heavenward yearning, I’m compelled to scoff at anything greater than this dirty muck which shackles us.

Read Full Post »

Although the old trope of the undersexed husband has been around for ages, it wasn’t quite accurate, at least until recently. General Social Survey warriors like Audacious E had dug up data showing that married couples have more sex than singles. (Forgive me for not finding the relevant post, I’m a lazy SOB).

I can recall objecting to the GSS sex frequency data on the grounds that it exaggerates the sexual wantonness of married couples compared to singles because the population of singles includes all the no-sex, fap-happy incels dragging down the sex frequency average for their group. I suggested this asexual albatross would conceal the incredibly-high, curve-busting sex frequency rates of unmarried alpha male cads who are following the “girlfriend and fling” formula for happiness.

While I can’t at the moment recall any posts I may have written confirming with data any factual basis for my objection, I can report that a recent study, via our resident gold star artist Captain Obvious, finds that there was a decline in sexual frequency among married or cohabiting American adults from 1989-2014.

American adults had sex about nine fewer times per year in the early 2010s compared to the late 1990s in data from the nationally representative General Social Survey, N = 26,620, 1989–2014. This was partially due to the higher percentage of unpartnered individuals, who have sex less frequently on average. Sexual frequency declined among the partnered (married or living together) but stayed steady among the unpartnered, reducing the marital/partnered advantage for sexual frequency. Declines in sexual frequency were similar across gender, race, region, educational level, and work status and were largest among those in their 50s, those with school-age children, and those who did not watch pornography. In analyses separating the effects of age, time period, and cohort, the decline was primarily due to birth cohort (year of birth, also known as generation). With age and time period controlled, those born in the 1930s (Silent generation) had sex the most often, whereas those born in the 1990s (Millennials and iGen) had sex the least often. The decline was not linked to longer working hours or increased pornography use. Age had a strong effect on sexual frequency: Americans in their 20s had sex an average of about 80 times per year, compared to about 20 times per year for those in their 60s. The results suggest that Americans are having sex less frequently due to two primary factors: An increasing number of individuals without a steady or marital partner and a decline in sexual frequency among those with partners.

Regular guests of this brazen retreat won’t be surprised by the relative sexlessness of the Millennial generation, a screechy, androgynous, narcissistic generation which from nearly every vantage point appears to be the most useless lump of Americans to ever squib outta their mommas’ womb chutes.

Nor will readers be surprised by the finding that old farts who look like raisins with eyes have less sex than virile youts who can still flaunt their sexual dimorphism.

What’s interesting is mentioned in the last line: sex frequency is down over the period because there are more unpartnered people having no sex, and partnered couples are having less sex.

So….the incel demo is exploding. That would seem to confirm a CH observation of the sexual market; namely that the prolonged unmarried phase of courtship (aka the cock carousel) is supercharging female hypergamy. A lot of single in the city ladies are sharing HSMV men and leaving less charismatic beta males in the cold. That explains the male incels. The rise in female insols is explained by the concurrent rise in obesity (and aggro-feminism). Fat chicks and annoying chicks really do have less sex than slender, feminine babes, because men also exercise choice of mate.

The remaining mystery is why married and cohabiting sex frequency is decreasing. Captain Obvious writes,

Shitlib & Libertardian geeks and nerds at /. were sounding thoroughly Red-Pilled about this – talking about Phuckerbergbook, SSRIs, pr0n, the decline in earning power, an omnipresent sense of trepidation & cowardice & fear pervading much of the population, etc etc etc – and one dude even div0rced his wife over her iPhag Addiction: https://science.slashdot.org/story/17/03/07/2313232/americans-are-having-less-sex-than-20-years-ago-study-finds

Yes to all of that as causes for the sex frequency decline, but again I must humbly suggest that the primary causes are female obesity, female economic self-sufficiency, and the multigenerational drop in testosterone.

Female obesity: men are visually stimulated to bedroom action, and men really are disgusted by the sight of a female fatbody. Men, and especially White men with options, will fap to porn before bouncing dick-first into a fat chick’s belly brûlée. The obesity epidemic shows no signs of letting up, and that’s gotta have an effect on the national GCP (Gross Carnal Product).

Female economic self-sufficiency: women are aroused by powerful men with resources to spare on them, and they are turned off by powerless cash-strapped men. Women who are in less need of a man’s resources are also less sexually interested in men who don’t make substantially more than they make (or have other compensating traits). If husbands’ incomes have decreased relative to wives’ incomes, then there will be a shift toward wives desiring less sex from their husbands. It’s biomechanics all the way down.

Testosterone decline: this one is self-evident. Lower T means lower libido, for men but also for women. Since men are the initiators of sex (especially within the confines of a long term relationship), a low libido man will initiate less frequently, and his woman won’t take up the slack (women have a lot of pride about their ability to passively rouse their men to ardor, which is why they don’t like making the first move). If there’s lower T in women as well (a small amount of testosterone does affect female libido), then that would kill the passion just as quickly. Finally, low T men are just a plain turn-off to women. I have read studies which found women preferred the musky scent of sweaty shirts of men with high T.

All of this is leading to sex-starved husbands and the high divorce rate, because no matter how sacred your marital vows if hubby ain’t getting any his guilt about checking out of the marriage evaporates in a haze of 31 Redtube tabs.

Read Full Post »

At the end of the last post, I wrote about the modern sexual market and how it may relate to dysgenic breeding.

In my opinion, the current situation is unsustainable. Something’s gotta give. In a near-future post, I will explain how our postmodern sexual market dovetails with evidence that the West is careening toward idiocracy.

Well, the evidence is arriving by hatemail, and it doesn’t look good for the Pollyannas.

From the linked research paper:

Social Epistasis Amplifies the Fitness Costs of Deleterious Mutations, Engendering Rapid Fitness Decline Among Modernized Populations

Deleterious mutations are typically understood exclusively in terms of their harmful effects on carrier organisms. But there are convincing reasons to think that such adverse effects are not confined to the individual level. We argue that in social species, interorganismal gene-gene interactions, which in previous literatures have been termed social epistasis, allow genomes carrying deleterious mutations to reduce via group-level pleiotropy the fitness of others, including noncarriers. This fitness reduction occurs by way of degradation of group-level processes that optimize the reproductive ecology of a population for intergroup competition through, among other mechanisms, suppression of free-riding. Such damage to group regulatory processes suggests a hidden role for the accumulation of behavior-altering “spiteful” mutations in the dynamics of the demographic transition—these mutations may have contributed to the maladaptive outcomes of this process, such as widespread subreplacement fertility. A structured population model is presented describing aspects of this social epistasis amplification model. This phenomenon is also considered as a potential explanation for the results of Calhoun’s mouse utopia experiments, which provide an opportunity to directly test a major prediction stemming from the model.

In plainspeak, the dangerously scaled-up and decadent postmodern West has lost the ability (and the willpower) to cleanse itself of toxic people who have bad DNA mojo and even worse character, and the resulting sludge will build up to the level where the West will collapse under the weight of its welfare state-supported genetic sewage (insert visual of those Ethiopians buried alive by a garbage heap avalanche (true story)).

The paper (according to second-hand sources….I wasn’t able to access the full text) has data that the IQ of Western nations is falling some 0.8 points per generation, and the blame for it is apportioned mostly to dysgenic patterns of fertility, which it explains as consequences of modern post-industrial societies easing up the cultural selection pressures on their populations. The study authors finger the source of the problem as postmodern marriage and childbirth trends; more dumb people (specifically, women) than smart people are having kids, and more people (specifically, women) are waiting until later in life to have kids and therefore passing on more genetic mutations that have accumulated with age in the parents.

The cock carousel is birthing the moron merry-go-round. Sex and the City is being remade as IVF and the Refugees.

Modern, indulgent society — which in reality is the modern sexual market, since society is an emergent property of reproductive dynamics — creates massive, positively reinforcing feedback loops that essentially reward degeneracy and corruption by allowing it to run wild and unopposed, instead of snuffing it out in the crib. Free-riders at first slowly increase in number in a prosperous, proto-declining society, and if their growth isn’t halted early a rapid, exponential decline metastasizes until free-riding becomes the norm. When that happens, social collapse is guaranteed and maybe even necessary for the rebirth that can only occur after the free-riders are washed out of the system (usually in not-so-nice ways….think fire hoses and flamethrowers or, if we’re lucky, the humane option of welfare contingent on mandatory birth control).

There’s a lot going on in this paper, which draws Calhoun’s rat experiments and group selection (a controversial subject) into its theory of dysgenic breeding enabled by a soft, feminized, virtue signaling West. Urban density and anonymity are increasing within the population a lot of weird sexual paraphilias and psychological problems, and as discussed in the previous CH post the severing of the sexual market from the marriage market is delaying family formation and childbirth and contributing to the dysgenic reproductive skew. That, coupled with the pathological altruism that has run amok among White Westerners who basically want the West to be an enormous safety net and catch basin for the world’s 7 billion poors, is pushing White societies close to complete collapse — a cosmic own-goal so amazingly self-destructive that Darwinian selection is practically guaranteed to work swiftly and mercilessly at the task of culling the White West of its low fitness leftoid freaks.

In the end, as always, Diversity + Proximity = War, and as the study authors note, if a group isn’t bothering to defend itself, other groups will be more than willing to fill the power vacuum.

I’m warning shitlibs, get on board the Trump Train. Because if he fails to stop the Sewer World inflow and Globohomo one market dystopia, you libs are NOT gonna like what has to follow.

“You have to be cruel to be kind, in the right measure.” The West needs to relearn the value of this timeless lesson.

***

Readers wonder about suggestions to stem the idiocratic tide. I have offered many within these hallowed Chateau halls. For instance, there’s the CH BOSSS system; let’s break the back of the FemKunt KKKollective and get our HSMV men paired off with young, feminine secretaries less interested in careers than in mothering so the good genes can spread around more evenly to the whole of the White tribe. Close the borders. Kick out the illegals and anchor babies. End wage-gutting cheat codes like the H-1B visa program. Destroy the anti-White propaganda mills (many tools for this, including anti-trust and defunding leftoid institutions). As a last resort, allow the blue states committed to their suicidal ideation to secede from the union.

We in the West are on the precipice of annihilation and a complete repudiation of our past greatness. The good news: there’s still time to fix this. The bad news: there’s not much time left, and there’s a lot to fix.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: