Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Biomechanics is God’ Category

There are two societal cataclysms set to collide in the West, and unless we foresee them, as CH has foreseen them, and actively prevent their efflorescence, the West is doomed.

The Sexbot Revolution (it’s happening), in conjunction with the introduction of the male Pill, will upend the sexual market and bring chaos to long-established and evolved implicit rules of conduct. The biggest impact will be a reduction in the asking price of women (in normie terms: a lot of sub-hottie women will have to date below their league if they don’t want to be alone). Sexbots, and other realistic simulacra of sex with a hot woman, will occupy the attention and, ahem, energy of a mass of omega and beta males who will prefer the intense experience of release with their Minka Kelly lookalike bots over uninspiring sex with the human plain janes and fatties who would normally be their lot.

What sexbots and VR tech (yolodecks) will essentially create is a massive unemployment crisis among Western women. These castaways will struggle to find love and marriage (which is a woman’s prime purpose in life). Omega males and those marginal rejects on the left hand side of the beta male curve will also be out of the sexual market, but their joblessness won’t hit them as psychologically hard as it does beta women, because the men will be the jobless equivalent of “not seeking work”, content to wile away their recreational time (by then almost all their time) in the uncannily supple bosoms of their sexbots.

Alpha men will take up the IRL slack and collect large de facto, and by that time de jure, harems of girlfriends, wives, and mistresses. It won’t be long after sexbots become affordable that there will be changes in law to permit polygyny (one alpha man, many women). Polygyny is Africa, if you need a picture in your head.

After a while, there will be sexbots for women, though the technology to make a realistic male sexbot will have to be far more advanced, given that lonely women will want them mostly for romantic pillow talk, intuitive understanding, and household chores.

***

The Robot Revolution (it’s been happening) will squeeze the sexual market from the other end. Just as mass Dirt World immigration has gutted the wages of working class men and fueled the opioid epidemic in their towns, the mass immigration of robots into the job market will place more downward pressure on the wages of blue collar men and in most cases drive them completely out of work, with no hope of new market niches opening up that don’t require high IQ and educational attainment to realistically enter.

Eventually, like with male sexbots filling the sexual market vacuum left by female sexbots, carnally-neutral industrial robots will move into pink collar and even some white collar occupations, putting a lot of “Gay Mulatto’s people” out of work. In fifty years, robots will be doing accounting, legal, administrative, HR, data entry, reporting, and maybe even programming jobs. That’s a lot of “new economy” jobs removed from human circulation by robots. It won’t be just service industry grunts or farmhands who bear the brunt of automation.

Think of it this way: industrial and commercial robots replace repetitive motion and repetitive thinking tasks, sexbots replace repetitive relationship and repetitive reproduction tasks.

Any repetitive motion or thinking task can be automated, and will be if the FREE MARKET is left to its invisible hand devices. The same goes for sexbots putting metaphorical pink collars out of work.

The Luddism counter-argument that usually comes up when this topic stirs libertardians from their vape dens falls immediately flat on close inspection. Automobiles (proto-robots) put a lot of horses out to pasture, with no chance for job retraining because horses aren’t very smart and can’t be taught C++. These excess horses were killed for dog meat and soap, or returned to the wild to fend for themselves. There are limits to market niche exploitation and economic mobility; each new and improved automation revolution ratchets up the cognitive demands on those “put out to pasture” by the robot technology.

As robots take over ever more low-, mid-, and high-skill jobs, the humans formerly employed in those jobs simply won’t have the IQ horsepower or suitable temperament to adequately retrain themselves in the chaotically reoriented job market that will be created in the wake of the robot economy. It’s pie-in-the-sky wishful thinking to presume a longshoreman can be retrained to, say, program robot algorithms. And all those lawyers and paralegals who lose their jobs to automation will have a tough time trying to learn principles of electrical conductance.

The ones who will be spared the negative externalities of the robot and sexbot revolutions will be those whose creativity, fluid intelligence, spontaneity, and incomparable sexuality can’t be sufficiently mimicked by artificial substitutes. Perhaps street artists will be lucky enough to avoid joblessness in our robot overlord future, whatever income pittance they must accept for their artistic vision, and be free to carry on snarking about “Trumpkins” and “redneck methheads”.

Alpha males won’t have to worry about sexbots; for them, the sexbot revolution will create a pornucopia of delights as they are besieged by desperate women who literally can’t find a man because three quarters of them are locked in their bedrooms completely satiated from week-long sessions with their Ivanka Trumpbots. Slender hot babes will still have a real man to call their own….as long as they’re ok with him calling additional women his own. I’m not saying this to spite anyone; I’m a messenger of sexual market reality, and I’m telling you this is what’s most likely to happen when armies of hot babe substitutes are introduced into the field of courtship. Sexbots will skew the sex ratio and that has mate choice implications that greatly amplify the affects of vidgya gaming and YouFap.

The Globohomo Bathhouse Alliance won’t have to worry about job-stealing robots (at first), unless AI progresses to the point that Skynet makes human class distinctions irrelevant (in the “wipe all the classes out” way). So don’t expect our queer leaders to do anything to stop the robot, or sexbot, invasions. If anything, they’ll encourage the sexbot and robot takeover, assuming its the best intervention to mollify the uppity masses.

The remaining mystery is what, exactly, all those jobless Westerners will buy with the money they’re not making. Mass joblessness means sexbots rotting on the shelves. The 1% will become the 0.0001% and there won’t be enough wealthy investors to keep the robot revolution moving forward. There will have to be an injection of money from somewhere, and that will mean the government printing money like it’s going out of style, to pay all those now-expendable humans a guaranteed basic income. Inflation will, must, return with a fury.

Alternatively, robots will decrease the price of almost all consumer goods so dramatically (due to low extraction and production overhead and zero human labor costs) that everything one could want will cost pennies, and we will have a society like the Wall-E spaceship, all needs catered and pleasures serviced by round-the-clock robots and sexbots, as we get fatter, weaker, stupider, lazier, more feminized, and less rebellious toward the disappearance of meaning from our lives. Government will exist primarily to regulate the profits that the top 0.00001% — those who own the robot-operated factories and distribution centers — can skim from their enterprises, because there will be democratically-elected incentive to keep the prices of goods affordable for people making no more than the Fake Money from their Fake Incomes provided to them by Uncle Samantha.

What I am predicting, then, is a total fertility and financial collapse in the West not long after the robot and sexbot revolutions metastasize and Occupy Main Street. Robots will herald financial collapse from debt spending and money printing. Sexbots will herald fertility collapse from marriage abandonment and a mass exodus of men and women from the dating scene. Literally, currency and seed will be spilled fruitlessly into an empty abyss.

Cataclysms colliding. The people who voted for Trump, in their unarticulated way, are the first angsty salvos against this coming collision. Nationalism, race, and family are the only bulwarks that can stop the dystopian juggernaut, and that’s why the elite are in a frenzy to stump what Trump represents.

Read Full Post »

Commenter Karl Marx (fitting) wonders if sexual shame is the real reason why good-looking men with no Game fail with women.

Are you not conflating mental problems with no game? Most good looking guys who can’t get laid have some sort of mental hangup. If parents embed deep sexual shame into their sons no amount of PUA tactics can save a man.

Garden-variety introversion and dullness are common afflictions and not indicative of “mental hangups”. Sexual shame is a useless Freudian concept that has almost no basis in reality outside of weird religious communities and mentally ill autogynephilic trannies.

You go to great lengths about the effectiveness of shaming women, fat people but consider sexual shame “no basis in reality”?

Shaming “women”? No, shaming “fat women”. And the reason is obvious: fat kills romance dead. But I have never met a man who did poorly with women because he had some deep-seated “sexual shame”. That’s not how it goes for the vast majority of men who have trouble getting women. Just the opposite really; men have NO sexual shame and a great desire to FULFILL their sexual craving, but lack the courage and acumen to satisfy their lust. The tension between their sexual SHAMELESSNESS and their sexual FAILURE is what causes them to swallow black pills by the mouthful and grasp discredited Freudian gobbledygook to rationalize their incel torment.

How you are treated throughout your childhood affects you your whole life.

Hm, a loaded statement that, while containing nuggets of truth, has come under fire from geneticists who haven’t located any strong correlation between shared environment and life outcome. The evidence appears to be heading in the direction of genes piloting the ship of fate, with environment (parents and peers) playing a smaller role as co-pilot.

Anyhow, social shaming of boys will never be powerful enough to override their later sexual desires. Like I said, most men aren’t deviants acutely ashamed of their insolent boners. What they are is supplicating, fearful dullards who place pussy on the pedestal thinking that will help them get laid, and yes that should be shamed by better men who know it’s not what women want.

Read Full Post »

There’s a lot of discussion about the Hajnal Line within the HBD and Maul-Right wokeweb, and rightly so because it’s an important concept and theoretical framework which goes a long way to explaining our current scourge of pathological altruism afflicting Anglosphere Whites. That in mind, I offer a succinct primer on Hajnalianism for any readers who are unfamiliar with the idea.

Enfant Terrible asks,

What’s a East-hajnalian?

It refers to any White European born and raised outside of the Hajnal Line, a geographic boundary that roughly separates Northwest Europe from South and East Europe based on historical patterns of out-group altruism (ie cuckery) that likely evolved under selective pressure from a variety of sociocultural inputs and that has now become pathologically suicidal in the modern environment of rapid intercontinental travel and social media-fueled virtue signaling status arms races.

The Hajnal Line may be the key that explains every insane leftoid subversion of Western White nations that we see unfolding today.

Hope this helps.

Read Full Post »

The Bigly Epigone has done a yeolord’s job compiling demographic data on voting patterns in the 2016 national election. Barring a couple of surprises, the data confirm what we in the wokentariat already know about our tooth-and-claw Diversitopia and its consequences for the continued survival of the nation.

One of the highest IQ groups — single Jewish women — voted in nearly the same overwhelming number for Hillary “thecunt” Clinton as did one of the lowest IQ groups — black single mothers, (88% and 97%, respectively). Only “black women” and “black single mothers” had a lower Trump-vote share than did single Jewesses.

This voting data provides evidence for my observation that no group has a greater disconnect between their practiced lifestyles and signaled virtues than do Jewish women. Jews are perhaps the most hypocritical group in America today. Call it anti-semitism if it makes you feel assuaged, but it’s what the real world is telling us.

Also, for any cucked con who thinks there’s a groundswell of “natural conservatives” among nonblack nonWhites and sexual deviants just waiting to storm national elections if the GOPe supplicates hard enough, here are the depressing facts:

TRUMP VOTE SHARE

homos: 20.7%
muslims: 28.4%
hispanics: 32.2%
hindus: 34%
asian women: 33.7%
asian men: 40.7%

Demography is destiny.

The biggest Trump supporters?

White Protestants (68%)
Married White Protestants (70.6%)
Mormons (71.6%, the beeg weiner)

Trumperica is basically Heritage America plus the Wonder Bread of Whites, Mormons.

Which brings us to Surprise #1: Trump’s vote share among single Jewish men was 35.9%, more than three times the number of single Jewish women Trump voters. And among married Jews, an astounding 58.8% majority of married Jewish men voted for Trump! (The corresponding Trump share number for married Jewish women was 42.9%.)

So before we finger all the blame for our nation’s decline on Jews, it’s a good idea to remind oneself that 6 in 10 married Jewish men have boarded the same Trump Train as the goyim. Now we know why all those Jewish men who have enough on the ball to be marriageable like to marry shiksas….they can’t stand their own women’s feminist kvetching.

Which brings us to (Sorta) Surprise #2. Audacious E and Steve Sailer stress that the real dividing line is, and continues to be, marrieds versus unmarrieds rather than women versus men. I wonder though if AE & SS haven’t missed what I consider the most telling demographic Trump vote share revelation. As anonymous over at Sailer’s comments,

Which of these things is not like the others?

Single white women: 39.0
Married white women: 61.4
Single white men: 59.0
Married white men: 61.0

That’s peculiar (not). There’s one glaring outlier to the pro-Trump voting trend among Whites, and it isn’t the generic “unmarried Whites”. It’s “single White women”. Single White men voted for Trump in almost the same numbers as did married White men. Our traitorous, thecunt-loving, Trump-hating Whites are predominately SINGLE WHITE WOMEN. We are betrayed by the sobbingly empty wombs and cock-carved twat tubes of the libarts and salty tarts crowd. Honestly, we all should have seen this betrayal cumming. Single White women have politically (and even socially and sexually) morphed into nonWhites, seeing the government as a substitute beta male provider who doesn’t demand much in return (sex) and lets them slut it up with sexy cads.

So it’s more accurate to say the real dividing line in American politics, at least among Whites, is single White women versus all other Whites.

And from personal anecdote, I can tell you this is true. I have heard more than one single White woman gripe about how her mom or dad or both voted for Trump and she just couldn’t understand what they were thinking.

I can tell her what her parents were thinking about: the future. Single White women have apparently forgotten what the future of their homeland should resemble, or that a future even exists.

***

Update: jackmcg makes a good point about that anomalously high married Jewish men vote share for Trump.

Jewish men didn’t vote majority Trump. Lol. Please.

Most Jewish men will claim they are ATHEIST or NON-RELIGIOUS in these polls.

Sure, religiously identifying Jewish men voted slightly majority Trump. 58% is still paltry though.

This happens all the time, yo. An exit poll that shows Jews voted pro-White ALWAYS leads back atheist Jews claiming they’re not Jews.

Yes, the “married Jewish men” demographic is misleading because it’s probably capturing those Jewish men who still identify as Jewish, rather than as unaffiliated, atheist, or non-religious. This means that data point is likely a snapshot of Orthodox Jewish support for Trump, which was already well-known. The problem is that, though they have a higher birth rate than secular Jews, Orthodox Jews are a minority of Jews in America, and an even smaller influence culturally. Overall Jewish secular support, both married and unmarried, is heavily tilted toward thecunt and her Democreep Party. Secular Jews really do vote like Puerto Ricans and live like WASPs.

The quadumvirate of nation-destroying demographics is therefore: Jews, single White women, homos, and nonWhites. As it ever was (except in Israel).

And don’t expect this trend to reverse or even slow down. As long as the White marriage rate continues falling and the age of first marriage continues rising, the numbers of single White bitterbitches in the population will explode, and with their growing numerical electoral power the decline and death of America is sure to follow.

Make America Great Again (MAGA) should be closely paired with Who Bitch This Is (WBTI), if we seek the salvation of our country.

Read Full Post »

Reader _svd comments about the changes in his life after a tumor caused his T to crash.

I’m a guy who’ve been born with high T, got a benign tumor that plummeted my levels of both T AND E at my late teens, and only found out about it and fixed it 15 years latter.

Handsome, nice body, smart, charismatic, good sense of humor. High-earner from early 20s. Work 4 hours a day. Eastern European (so, tough upbringing).

From the list above, everything re work ethics does not apply to me – always was “get the shit done” kind of guy. Good high-flying career in small high-value businesses with no corporate BS. Never was afraid of applying or receiving violence (but then I’m EE). I’ve also got through STEM with no problems. Hate ballbusters and feminists.

That’s what 100% true:
* no sex attraction. At all. To the point of complete celibacy for years – no interest in girls. Function was there, and very decent (last for long, recharge fast, though enjoyed the foreplay more than actual sex), but quick fap felt better to release pressure. And that’s what sex was about: releasing pressure. Started dating out of sense of loneliness. Women had to initiate sex when she wanted it (they usually did, as on the outside I’m Mr. Right from romance novels).
* total blindness toward any signals from women. They just don’t register.
* no interest toward team sport. I love boxing though, and ran daily sparrings for a decade. No problem with being competitive or dominant in work setting.
* never owned a car (but you don’t really need one in Europe). Always was irrelevant to cars.
* good erection required fetish. Mine was D/s on D side.
* facial features softened (and started changing back surprisingly fast with T levels restored). No facial hairs at 30 (again, fixed with T – although it was convenient). No problem with nose, ears or other body parts.

One more: depression as a norm of life. Suicide intentions for years. That fueled passive attitude toward the world and may have been seen like weakness.

Ask questions if interested.

Other effects of low T on a nation’s men:

  • leftist politics
  • vocal fry
  • uptalk
  • esssra klein
  • manboobs
  • john scalzi
  • beta orbiting
  • grinding incel
  • male feminists
  • experimental homosexuality
  • bad taste in, well, everything
  • androgyny in look and attitude
  • cuckoldry and miscegenation
  • marathon running
  • carbface
  • interracial adoption
  • anti-trumpism
  • open borders
  • antifa
  • vidgya gaming-induced deep vein thrombosis
  • protruding nipples (very disrespectful)
  • anal play and anal play accessories
  • math class is hard
  • intersectionality
  • shia lapoofter
  • fake news
  • NPR
  • tranny “rights”
  • butt-kicking babes
  • equalism
  • haven monahan (and other fake rape fantasies)
  • patton oswalt
  • talmudic sophistry
  • barack obama
  • hypocrisy
  • disloyalty
  • snark
  • censorship
  • literal bending over backwards for invading hordes of higher fertility ingrates
  • social justice posturing
  • “toxic masculinity” (the irony)

As you can see, chronically low T on both the individual and societal level is almost entirely downside. Bullying decreases. Maybe you could call that an upside. I wouldn’t.

Read Full Post »

This is a sad story. I don’t intend any mean-spiritedness by telling you all this story. My shiv is sheathed. My purpose in passing along this real life anecdote is to expose the heartlessness of the sexual market so that you and those you love can know the monster who stalks you till the end. You won’t defeat this monster, but you can avoid accidentally stepping into its maw before your time.

A lanky White woman hit on me once. She was thin, but ugly. At the time, I rebuffed her plausibly-concealed solicitation. Over the months that followed, I would see her occasionally, here and there, around our itty bitty city, usually alone or working at a service job. The months turned into a few years. Still, I would catch glimpses of her every so often, working different low-pay service jobs.

I left the city, but my travels would take me back there sometimes, for month-long stays. Again, and weirdly coincidental, I saw her about town. And again, she was working in the service industry. Job-hopping from one middling wage outpost to another had become her lifestyle. Still ugly, but now older too.

In all these incidental path-crossings, I’d sometimes catch a look of recognition sweep across her face, but not always. I nonetheless pretended not to recognize her.

I would always feel sad when I saw her, because I knew if she were more attractive her life would be very different. A man of means would have scooped her up years ago, rescued her from that wage slave crush of unmarried despair, and given her the life so many women dream about as little girls. The house, the yard, the children, the comfort, the sense that the future is safe and secured and she is loved….all of it would have been hers if the God of Biomechanics had been more generous to her when the spark of life was breathed into her earthly story.

No pretty girl suffers the indignities of the callous job market for long. Men value female beauty so much they will bend metal with their minds if it can give them a hot girlfriend or wife. To rescue a fetching minx from soulkilling drudgery and sweep her into the good life is in fact many men’s fantasy.

If the woman of my anecdote were prettier, she could be that happy effervescent lady from the suburbs who picks up her coffee and pities the poor sub-prime ugly woman behind the counter taking her payment.

In the final abacus, sometimes all the difference between hell and heaven is a few millimeters of facial bone structure.

I can never stop forgetting this banal, gutter-bound ugly truth, which is why, even in my sincerest moments of heavenward yearning, I’m compelled to scoff at anything greater than this dirty muck which shackles us.

Read Full Post »

Although the old trope of the undersexed husband has been around for ages, it wasn’t quite accurate, at least until recently. General Social Survey warriors like Audacious E had dug up data showing that married couples have more sex than singles. (Forgive me for not finding the relevant post, I’m a lazy SOB).

I can recall objecting to the GSS sex frequency data on the grounds that it exaggerates the sexual wantonness of married couples compared to singles because the population of singles includes all the no-sex, fap-happy incels dragging down the sex frequency average for their group. I suggested this asexual albatross would conceal the incredibly-high, curve-busting sex frequency rates of unmarried alpha male cads who are following the “girlfriend and fling” formula for happiness.

While I can’t at the moment recall any posts I may have written confirming with data any factual basis for my objection, I can report that a recent study, via our resident gold star artist Captain Obvious, finds that there was a decline in sexual frequency among married or cohabiting American adults from 1989-2014.

American adults had sex about nine fewer times per year in the early 2010s compared to the late 1990s in data from the nationally representative General Social Survey, N = 26,620, 1989–2014. This was partially due to the higher percentage of unpartnered individuals, who have sex less frequently on average. Sexual frequency declined among the partnered (married or living together) but stayed steady among the unpartnered, reducing the marital/partnered advantage for sexual frequency. Declines in sexual frequency were similar across gender, race, region, educational level, and work status and were largest among those in their 50s, those with school-age children, and those who did not watch pornography. In analyses separating the effects of age, time period, and cohort, the decline was primarily due to birth cohort (year of birth, also known as generation). With age and time period controlled, those born in the 1930s (Silent generation) had sex the most often, whereas those born in the 1990s (Millennials and iGen) had sex the least often. The decline was not linked to longer working hours or increased pornography use. Age had a strong effect on sexual frequency: Americans in their 20s had sex an average of about 80 times per year, compared to about 20 times per year for those in their 60s. The results suggest that Americans are having sex less frequently due to two primary factors: An increasing number of individuals without a steady or marital partner and a decline in sexual frequency among those with partners.

Regular guests of this brazen retreat won’t be surprised by the relative sexlessness of the Millennial generation, a screechy, androgynous, narcissistic generation which from nearly every vantage point appears to be the most useless lump of Americans to ever squib outta their mommas’ womb chutes.

Nor will readers be surprised by the finding that old farts who look like raisins with eyes have less sex than virile youts who can still flaunt their sexual dimorphism.

What’s interesting is mentioned in the last line: sex frequency is down over the period because there are more unpartnered people having no sex, and partnered couples are having less sex.

So….the incel demo is exploding. That would seem to confirm a CH observation of the sexual market; namely that the prolonged unmarried phase of courtship (aka the cock carousel) is supercharging female hypergamy. A lot of single in the city ladies are sharing HSMV men and leaving less charismatic beta males in the cold. That explains the male incels. The rise in female insols is explained by the concurrent rise in obesity (and aggro-feminism). Fat chicks and annoying chicks really do have less sex than slender, feminine babes, because men also exercise choice of mate.

The remaining mystery is why married and cohabiting sex frequency is decreasing. Captain Obvious writes,

Shitlib & Libertardian geeks and nerds at /. were sounding thoroughly Red-Pilled about this – talking about Phuckerbergbook, SSRIs, pr0n, the decline in earning power, an omnipresent sense of trepidation & cowardice & fear pervading much of the population, etc etc etc – and one dude even div0rced his wife over her iPhag Addiction: https://science.slashdot.org/story/17/03/07/2313232/americans-are-having-less-sex-than-20-years-ago-study-finds

Yes to all of that as causes for the sex frequency decline, but again I must humbly suggest that the primary causes are female obesity, female economic self-sufficiency, and the multigenerational drop in testosterone.

Female obesity: men are visually stimulated to bedroom action, and men really are disgusted by the sight of a female fatbody. Men, and especially White men with options, will fap to porn before bouncing dick-first into a fat chick’s belly brûlée. The obesity epidemic shows no signs of letting up, and that’s gotta have an effect on the national GCP (Gross Carnal Product).

Female economic self-sufficiency: women are aroused by powerful men with resources to spare on them, and they are turned off by powerless cash-strapped men. Women who are in less need of a man’s resources are also less sexually interested in men who don’t make substantially more than they make (or have other compensating traits). If husbands’ incomes have decreased relative to wives’ incomes, then there will be a shift toward wives desiring less sex from their husbands. It’s biomechanics all the way down.

Testosterone decline: this one is self-evident. Lower T means lower libido, for men but also for women. Since men are the initiators of sex (especially within the confines of a long term relationship), a low libido man will initiate less frequently, and his woman won’t take up the slack (women have a lot of pride about their ability to passively rouse their men to ardor, which is why they don’t like making the first move). If there’s lower T in women as well (a small amount of testosterone does affect female libido), then that would kill the passion just as quickly. Finally, low T men are just a plain turn-off to women. I have read studies which found women preferred the musky scent of sweaty shirts of men with high T.

All of this is leading to sex-starved husbands and the high divorce rate, because no matter how sacred your marital vows if hubby ain’t getting any his guilt about checking out of the marriage evaporates in a haze of 31 Redtube tabs.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: