Why Women Should Leave the Battlefield Badassery To Their Men

View this post on Instagram

Throwback Thursday with the flamethrower 🔥 *DISCLAIMER : Yes the flamethrower really had that much pressure to kick me back. Yess my hair should have been up in a ponytail. Yesss it could have gone horribly wrong. AND lastly… Yessss if you comment about any of above mention items you are a d-bag 💋* #flamethrower #gunvideos #weaponsfeed #igmilitia #gundose #gunfreaks #gunchannels #sickguns #gunsbadassery #bad_ass_official #jillhensley #teamrocky #weaboutthatgunlife #oneshotindustries #burnmotherfuckerburn

A post shared by Jill Hensley Butler (@jill.hensley) on Apr 13, 2017 at 7:55am PDT

Bless her White Thrower heart (it’s in the right place), this girl shows what happens when women try to do a man’s job: Bigly kickback that knocks her small frame off-balance and sends the powered-up candlelight vigil shooting in every direction (hypothetically in the faces of friendlies).

Read Full Post »

Cuck Nation

TV is now a feminist wish fulfillment wasteland, glorifying every White man-hating matrigenic dystopia, from single mommery to race mixing to willing cuckoldry. The latter’s insinuation into popular (read: single White female and gay homosexual) culture has been egregious; willing cuckolds are everywhere, satisfying the female desire for alpha fux and beta bux. There are shows that have blatantly pro-cuck plot lines in which a pregnant slut or single slut mommy has beta phagg suitors lining up to swear their loyalty to the bastard spawn, while the alpha cads that knocked these hos up are either nowhere found onscreen or they come and go continuing to service the sprog-saddled skanks with the least investment possible.

Harry Potter was perhaps the first major shitlib touchstone to vault willing cuckoldry into the wider culture as some kind of moral imperative; it was beta orbiter Snape, a man with the worst case of oneitis imaginable because he was in love with a dead woman who when alive wanted nothing to do with him, who vowed to look after Harry, (the child of his oneitis by another man Snape hated), out of a misplaced sense of loyalty and maybe hope for an afterlife consummation.

Literally “alpha fux and beta bux” from beyond the grave. What independent, empowered modern woman wouldn’t love that?

Jane the Gutter Slut and Girls (if you can believe it) are two more cuntocracy brainwashing pipelines that women love which feature major arcs involving willing cuckold beta males swooping in to relieve the main female characters from the encroaching burden of single momhood, no questions asked, no faux-father responsibilities abdicated. Women cheer, (non-pussified) men reach for vomit bags.

There’s a reason women cheer Cuck Nation. They know that good men, on a gut level that is impossible to sway with sophistic shaming appeals to the contrary, don’t want to raise the bastards of other men. No man wants to be duped into 18 years of servitude to a child that’s not his own. For the few men who walk into cuckoldry with eyes wide open, they never shake the resentment that ceaselessly thrums from knowing they willingly chose to be cuckolds for the chance at regular sex with a single mom.

Women cheer because the fantasy of the willing cuckold saving women from their big mistakes is a repudiation of the intractable laws of Biomechanics, laws which irk women and which they desperately want overturned when personally beneficial. It’s a form of Power Play over men and over Nature, allowing women the (brief) escape from a reality with uncaring rules they must abide if they want a shot at happiness. TV tells them, hey ladies, you can have that happiness without those cumbersome rules. Magic is real!

The male version of this escape from Darwinian dressage is the trope of the nebbishy omega male with a hot blonde shiksa, or nerds exacting revenge on their jock tormentors. Rarely happens outside TVland, unless you count supreme gentleman Eliot Rodger.

Cuck Nation is the acculturation and codification of cuckoldry, both the duped and voluntary versions. Voluntary cucking is in a way more loathsome than unwilling cuckoldry, because it’s harder to fathom the depth of depravity to which a man must have sunk if bartering his cuckoldry seems to him like the only way he can buy sex and love, and with damaged goods no less.

We can say then that Cuck Nation is nothing less than the total surrender of masculinity and any male prerogatives to runaway androgyny and sexual polarity-inverting feminism. It’s the metaphorical equivalent of lopping off a nation’s balls and importing a few foreign stud horses to do all the seeding. And the saddest facet of this DNA-denying degeneracy is that there are more than a few self-flagellating manginas who lap this shit up and hi-five bitterbitches under the false impression that this will earn them a pity handjob.

Reader chris writes,

You can take the feminist definition of “rape culture” and replace every instance of rape with the word cuckold and it will perfectly explain what their agenda is.

Cuckold culture is a concept that examines a culture in which cuckoldry is pervasive and normalized due to societal attitudes about gender and sexuality.

I also propose that the manosphere create a new term.

Cuckoldism

Definition:
1) The promotion, advocacy, or support for an ideology of cuckoldry.
2) An ideology that seeks to enable, encourage, celebrate or normalise cuckoldry.
3) An ideology whose central organising premise is cuckoldry and its enabling.
4) Promotion of cuckoldry.

Cuckoldist
Definition
1) A person who believes in, advocates or supports cuckoldism.
2) A person who ascribes to an ideology of cuckoldism.

It will provide a conceptual rallying point for combating feminism, (or at least the parts of feminism that I believe many in the manosphere have a problem with). It will do for the manosphere what coining racism did for anti-racists or sexism did for feminists.

The cuckoldism portmanteau (cuckservative) vaulted the alt-Right to prominence because it was so effective at destroying GOPe credibility.

Then it’s just a matter of propagating emotionally reactive images of cuckoldry in practice and attaching it to that word.

i.e. http://www.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/mazxi/gf_pregnant_by_another_guy_after_wild_weekend_of/

or

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1rir7r/prefect_example_of_alpha_fucks_beta_bucks/

or

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/84261128/

And Boom! Pretty soon we can shut down any feminist in a debate by accusing her and her argument of being cuckoldist.

This agenda of cuckoldry is easily observed in #Gamergate:

Zoe Quinn cuckolded her boyfriend with 5 other men. He put her on blast for this and this pissed guys off as men don’t like cuckoldists. Then it took on a life of its own as being about ethics in gaming journalism.

But what has been the feminists’ response? To accuse the men of just wanting to slutshame Zoe Quinn. But just think of that for a moment, feminists oppose slut-shaming, by saying this event was about men trying to slut-shame Zoe Quinn they are extending the definition of slutshaming to women who cheat, to women who cuckold. By extending the definition out to such women feminists have made their agenda clear. Their agenda is cuckoldry and they will fight, agitate and advocate for the imposition of a culture that cuckolds men.

And the reason why the term cuckoldry so aptly encapsulates what the left/demoncrats/liberals/SJW’s/SWPL’s is doing to the right/Whites/heteronormative/traditional men and women is because cuckoldry is a form of parasitism, and the left/demoncrats/liberals/SJW’s/SWPL’s ARE trying to parasitise those on the right/Whites/heteronormative/traditional men and women.

A revised CH maxim comes to mind: The goal of feminism (and all anti-Whitism for that matter) is to remove all constraints on female sexuality/anti-White hatred while maximally restricting male sexuality/White prerogatives.

Less “this is my wife’s son”, more “to the moon, Alice!“ please.

Read Full Post »

The Illusionist Hottie

I once dated a hot little minx who was the spitting image of this chick.

In a slinky dress and made up, she would turn heads. Beautiful face, curvy hourglass figure, long legs, pert tits. Men AND women would check her out (former with lust, latter with envy and curiosity and proxy attraction for the CH with her) when we were out together.

But there was a problem. She was an illusionist hottie. Back home, clothes off, her body betrayed a surprising patchwork of unsightly flaws; thigh and ass dimples, creeping cottage cheese, an incipient fupa, and blotchy skin tone (probably from a bad diet). Even in dimmed light, I could see that the road to vajhalla would be a bumpy one.

She didn’t lift weights, and tragically she was one of those girls who could have benefited immensely from weightlifting instead of counting steps on her ClitBit. She was the poster girl for yoga pants as the push-up bra for the booty.

None of her body flaws were deal breakers. But there was just enough taut-less terrain wildly out of sync with her after hours glamour that I could never make peace with the whole package. The world saw one woman; I saw another. Sure, I loved showing her off when out on the town, but my pride was tainted with insider knowledge of the grit beneath the glitz.

It got to be that near fling’s end, I was looking for excuses to leave post-date with the intention of avoiding sex with her. {ed: judge me harshly.} Once, I made a cuddle suggestion when she started heating up during foreplay. COSMIC POLARITY INVERTED.

This woman created the worst dickonance —

dickonance: an incongruous feeling caused when intense arousal for a fully clothed woman clashes with deflating desire for her disrobed form.

— in me I have ever had to compartmentalize. I loved going out with her and soaking up her beauty when she was dressed to the nines, but I was indifferent to sleeping with her afterward. It was never that bad, but the wickedly unfair juxtaposition was needling me to the edge of insanity — I felt like Nature was playing a cruel joke on me, robbing me of the one nonnegotiable pleasure of a hot woman’s love: her stimulating naked form. The wedge between us widened to a chasm of unspeakable provenance.

She never knew the real reason it ended. I supplied a plausible explanation for my receding ardor that required no recourse to the state of her maculation, an explanation which in fact made me out to be a very bad person but bad in an understandable OH GEE ANOTHER NONCOMMITTAL DOUCHEBAG way and not bad in an OH FUCK YOU ARE THE DEVIL INCARNATE way. A few female tears I can handle. A deluge of waterworks that wrack the body and shake the shoulders I prefer not to witness. Or, worse, she might lunge for the kitchen knives in a blind rage.

I had no intention of revealing the stark nature of my un-caged id. She didn’t merit any meanness, so I committed relationship seppuku.

When it ended, friends asked what the hell I was thinking. “She was a hottie! What the hell were you thinking?” was what they said. I lied that we had incompatible personalities. I doubt they bought it, (no one really buys it when a man claims a relationship ended because of personality issues), but I was not eager to sully her lady-honor by exposing the pocked underbelly of our separation. I expose it here, anonymously and obliquely, because I suppose I’m seeking absolution. To confront one’s superficiality is fun and games in abstraction-space, but not so fun in real life with real lovers and their real hearts on the line.

The duality of man is his endless struggle to embrace, and to reject, to free, and to tame, the animal of him.

Read Full Post »

The Sexbot And Robot Revolutions: Cataclysms Colliding

There are two societal cataclysms set to collide in the West, and unless we foresee them, as CH has foreseen them, and actively prevent their efflorescence, the West is doomed.

The Sexbot Revolution (it’s happening), in conjunction with the introduction of the male Pill, will upend the sexual market and bring chaos to long-established and evolved implicit rules of conduct. The biggest impact will be a reduction in the asking price of women (in normie terms: a lot of sub-hottie women will have to date below their league if they don’t want to be alone). Sexbots, and other realistic simulacra of sex with a hot woman, will occupy the attention and, ahem, energy of a mass of omega and beta males who will prefer the intense experience of release with their Minka Kelly lookalike bots over uninspiring sex with the human plain janes and fatties who would normally be their lot.

What sexbots and VR tech (yolodecks) will essentially create is a massive unemployment crisis among Western women. These castaways will struggle to find love and marriage (which is a woman’s prime purpose in life). Omega males and those marginal rejects on the left hand side of the beta male curve will also be out of the sexual market, but their joblessness won’t hit them as psychologically hard as it does beta women, because the men will be the jobless equivalent of “not seeking work”, content to wile away their recreational time (by then almost all their time) in the uncannily supple bosoms of their sexbots.

Alpha men will take up the IRL slack and collect large de facto, and by that time de jure, harems of girlfriends, wives, and mistresses. It won’t be long after sexbots become affordable that there will be changes in law to permit polygyny (one alpha man, many women). Polygyny is Africa, if you need a picture in your head.

After a while, there will be sexbots for women, though the technology to make a realistic male sexbot will have to be far more advanced, given that lonely women will want them mostly for romantic pillow talk, intuitive understanding, and household chores.

***

The Robot Revolution (it’s been happening) will squeeze the sexual market from the other end. Just as mass Dirt World immigration has gutted the wages of working class men and fueled the opioid epidemic in their towns, the mass immigration of robots into the job market will place more downward pressure on the wages of blue collar men and in most cases drive them completely out of work, with no hope of new market niches opening up that don’t require high IQ and educational attainment to realistically enter.

Eventually, like with male sexbots filling the sexual market vacuum left by female sexbots, carnally-neutral industrial robots will move into pink collar and even some white collar occupations, putting a lot of “Gay Mulatto’s people” out of work. In fifty years, robots will be doing accounting, legal, administrative, HR, data entry, reporting, and maybe even programming jobs. That’s a lot of “new economy” jobs removed from human circulation by robots. It won’t be just service industry grunts or farmhands who bear the brunt of automation.

Think of it this way: industrial and commercial robots replace repetitive motion and repetitive thinking tasks, sexbots replace repetitive relationship and repetitive reproduction tasks.

Any repetitive motion or thinking task can be automated, and will be if the FREE MARKET is left to its invisible hand devices. The same goes for sexbots putting metaphorical pink collars out of work.

The Luddism counter-argument that usually comes up when this topic stirs libertardians from their vape dens falls immediately flat on close inspection. Automobiles (proto-robots) put a lot of horses out to pasture, with no chance for job retraining because horses aren’t very smart and can’t be taught C++. These excess horses were killed for dog meat and soap, or returned to the wild to fend for themselves. There are limits to market niche exploitation and economic mobility; each new and improved automation revolution ratchets up the cognitive demands on those “put out to pasture” by the robot technology.

As robots take over ever more low-, mid-, and high-skill jobs, the humans formerly employed in those jobs simply won’t have the IQ horsepower or suitable temperament to adequately retrain themselves in the chaotically reoriented job market that will be created in the wake of the robot economy. It’s pie-in-the-sky wishful thinking to presume a longshoreman can be retrained to, say, program robot algorithms. And all those lawyers and paralegals who lose their jobs to automation will have a tough time trying to learn principles of electrical conductance.

The ones who will be spared the negative externalities of the robot and sexbot revolutions will be those whose creativity, fluid intelligence, spontaneity, and incomparable sexuality can’t be sufficiently mimicked by artificial substitutes. Perhaps street artists will be lucky enough to avoid joblessness in our robot overlord future, whatever income pittance they must accept for their artistic vision, and be free to carry on snarking about “Trumpkins” and “redneck methheads”.

Alpha males won’t have to worry about sexbots; for them, the sexbot revolution will create a pornucopia of delights as they are besieged by desperate women who literally can’t find a man because three quarters of them are locked in their bedrooms completely satiated from week-long sessions with their Ivanka Trumpbots. Slender hot babes will still have a real man to call their own….as long as they’re ok with him calling additional women his own. I’m not saying this to spite anyone; I’m a messenger of sexual market reality, and I’m telling you this is what’s most likely to happen when armies of hot babe substitutes are introduced into the field of courtship. Sexbots will skew the sex ratio and that has mate choice implications that greatly amplify the affects of vidgya gaming and YouFap.

The Globohomo Bathhouse Alliance won’t have to worry about job-stealing robots (at first), unless AI progresses to the point that Skynet makes human class distinctions irrelevant (in the “wipe all the classes out” way). So don’t expect our queer leaders to do anything to stop the robot, or sexbot, invasions. If anything, they’ll encourage the sexbot and robot takeover, assuming its the best intervention to mollify the uppity masses.

The remaining mystery is what, exactly, all those jobless Westerners will buy with the money they’re not making. Mass joblessness means sexbots rotting on the shelves. The 1% will become the 0.0001% and there won’t be enough wealthy investors to keep the robot revolution moving forward. There will have to be an injection of money from somewhere, and that will mean the government printing money like it’s going out of style, to pay all those now-expendable humans a guaranteed basic income. Inflation will, must, return with a fury.

Alternatively, robots will decrease the price of almost all consumer goods so dramatically (due to low extraction and production overhead and zero human labor costs) that everything one could want will cost pennies, and we will have a society like the Wall-E spaceship, all needs catered and pleasures serviced by round-the-clock robots and sexbots, as we get fatter, weaker, stupider, lazier, more feminized, and less rebellious toward the disappearance of meaning from our lives. Government will exist primarily to regulate the profits that the top 0.00001% — those who own the robot-operated factories and distribution centers — can skim from their enterprises, because there will be democratically-elected incentive to keep the prices of goods affordable for people making no more than the Fake Money from their Fake Incomes provided to them by Uncle Samantha.

What I am predicting, then, is a total fertility and financial collapse in the West not long after the robot and sexbot revolutions metastasize and Occupy Main Street. Robots will herald financial collapse from debt spending and money printing. Sexbots will herald fertility collapse from marriage abandonment and a mass exodus of men and women from the dating scene. Literally, currency and seed will be spilled fruitlessly into an empty abyss.

Cataclysms colliding. The people who voted for Trump, in their unarticulated way, are the first angsty salvos against this coming collision. Nationalism, race, and family are the only bulwarks that can stop the dystopian juggernaut, and that’s why the elite are in a frenzy to stump what Trump represents.

Read Full Post »

The Myth Of Sexual Shame

Commenter Karl Marx (fitting) wonders if sexual shame is the real reason why good-looking men with no Game fail with women.

Are you not conflating mental problems with no game? Most good looking guys who can’t get laid have some sort of mental hangup. If parents embed deep sexual shame into their sons no amount of PUA tactics can save a man.

Garden-variety introversion and dullness are common afflictions and not indicative of “mental hangups”. Sexual shame is a useless Freudian concept that has almost no basis in reality outside of weird religious communities and mentally ill autogynephilic trannies.

You go to great lengths about the effectiveness of shaming women, fat people but consider sexual shame “no basis in reality”?

Shaming “women”? No, shaming “fat women”. And the reason is obvious: fat kills romance dead. But I have never met a man who did poorly with women because he had some deep-seated “sexual shame”. That’s not how it goes for the vast majority of men who have trouble getting women. Just the opposite really; men have NO sexual shame and a great desire to FULFILL their sexual craving, but lack the courage and acumen to satisfy their lust. The tension between their sexual SHAMELESSNESS and their sexual FAILURE is what causes them to swallow black pills by the mouthful and grasp discredited Freudian gobbledygook to rationalize their incel torment.

How you are treated throughout your childhood affects you your whole life.

Hm, a loaded statement that, while containing nuggets of truth, has come under fire from geneticists who haven’t located any strong correlation between shared environment and life outcome. The evidence appears to be heading in the direction of genes piloting the ship of fate, with environment (parents and peers) playing a smaller role as co-pilot.

Anyhow, social shaming of boys will never be powerful enough to override their later sexual desires. Like I said, most men aren’t deviants acutely ashamed of their insolent boners. What they are is supplicating, fearful dullards who place pussy on the pedestal thinking that will help them get laid, and yes that should be shamed by better men who know it’s not what women want.

Read Full Post »

The Hajnal Line, Abbreviated

There’s a lot of discussion about the Hajnal Line within the HBD and Maul-Right wokeweb, and rightly so because it’s an important concept and theoretical framework which goes a long way to explaining our current scourge of pathological altruism afflicting Anglosphere Whites. That in mind, I offer a succinct primer on Hajnalianism for any readers who are unfamiliar with the idea.

Enfant Terrible asks,

What’s a East-hajnalian?

It refers to any White European born and raised outside of the Hajnal Line, a geographic boundary that roughly separates Northwest Europe from South and East Europe based on historical patterns of out-group altruism (ie cuckery) that likely evolved under selective pressure from a variety of sociocultural inputs and that has now become pathologically suicidal in the modern environment of rapid intercontinental travel and social media-fueled virtue signaling status arms races.

The Hajnal Line may be the key that explains every insane leftoid subversion of Western White nations that we see unfolding today.

Hope this helps.

Read Full Post »

Demographic Breakdown Of The Pivotal 2016 Election

The Bigly Epigone has done a yeolord’s job compiling demographic data on voting patterns in the 2016 national election. Barring a couple of surprises, the data confirm what we in the wokentariat already know about our tooth-and-claw Diversitopia and its consequences for the continued survival of the nation.

One of the highest IQ groups — single Jewish women — voted in nearly the same overwhelming number for Hillary “thecunt” Clinton as did one of the lowest IQ groups — black single mothers, (88% and 97%, respectively). Only “black women” and “black single mothers” had a lower Trump-vote share than did single Jewesses.

This voting data provides evidence for my observation that no group has a greater disconnect between their practiced lifestyles and signaled virtues than do Jewish women. Jews are perhaps the most hypocritical group in America today. Call it anti-semitism if it makes you feel assuaged, but it’s what the real world is telling us.

Also, for any cucked con who thinks there’s a groundswell of “natural conservatives” among nonblack nonWhites and sexual deviants just waiting to storm national elections if the GOPe supplicates hard enough, here are the depressing facts:

TRUMP VOTE SHARE

homos: 20.7%
muslims: 28.4%
hispanics: 32.2%
hindus: 34%
asian women: 33.7%
asian men: 40.7%

Demography is destiny.

The biggest Trump supporters?

White Protestants (68%)
Married White Protestants (70.6%)
Mormons (71.6%, the beeg weiner)

Trumperica is basically Heritage America plus the Wonder Bread of Whites, Mormons.

Which brings us to Surprise #1: Trump’s vote share among single Jewish men was 35.9%, more than three times the number of single Jewish women Trump voters. And among married Jews, an astounding 58.8% majority of married Jewish men voted for Trump! (The corresponding Trump share number for married Jewish women was 42.9%.)

So before we finger all the blame for our nation’s decline on Jews, it’s a good idea to remind oneself that 6 in 10 married Jewish men have boarded the same Trump Train as the goyim. Now we know why all those Jewish men who have enough on the ball to be marriageable like to marry shiksas….they can’t stand their own women’s feminist kvetching.

Which brings us to (Sorta) Surprise #2. Audacious E and Steve Sailer stress that the real dividing line is, and continues to be, marrieds versus unmarrieds rather than women versus men. I wonder though if AE & SS haven’t missed what I consider the most telling demographic Trump vote share revelation. As anonymous over at Sailer’s comments,

Which of these things is not like the others?

Single white women: 39.0
Married white women: 61.4
Single white men: 59.0
Married white men: 61.0

That’s peculiar (not). There’s one glaring outlier to the pro-Trump voting trend among Whites, and it isn’t the generic “unmarried Whites”. It’s “single White women”. Single White men voted for Trump in almost the same numbers as did married White men. Our traitorous, thecunt-loving, Trump-hating Whites are predominately SINGLE WHITE WOMEN. We are betrayed by the sobbingly empty wombs and cock-carved twat tubes of the libarts and salty tarts crowd. Honestly, we all should have seen this betrayal cumming. Single White women have politically (and even socially and sexually) morphed into nonWhites, seeing the government as a substitute beta male provider who doesn’t demand much in return (sex) and lets them slut it up with sexy cads.

So it’s more accurate to say the real dividing line in American politics, at least among Whites, is single White women versus all other Whites.

And from personal anecdote, I can tell you this is true. I have heard more than one single White woman gripe about how her mom or dad or both voted for Trump and she just couldn’t understand what they were thinking.

I can tell her what her parents were thinking about: the future. Single White women have apparently forgotten what the future of their homeland should resemble, or that a future even exists.

***

Update: jackmcg makes a good point about that anomalously high married Jewish men vote share for Trump.

Jewish men didn’t vote majority Trump. Lol. Please.

Most Jewish men will claim they are ATHEIST or NON-RELIGIOUS in these polls.

Sure, religiously identifying Jewish men voted slightly majority Trump. 58% is still paltry though.

This happens all the time, yo. An exit poll that shows Jews voted pro-White ALWAYS leads back atheist Jews claiming they’re not Jews.

Yes, the “married Jewish men” demographic is misleading because it’s probably capturing those Jewish men who still identify as Jewish, rather than as unaffiliated, atheist, or non-religious. This means that data point is likely a snapshot of Orthodox Jewish support for Trump, which was already well-known. The problem is that, though they have a higher birth rate than secular Jews, Orthodox Jews are a minority of Jews in America, and an even smaller influence culturally. Overall Jewish secular support, both married and unmarried, is heavily tilted toward thecunt and her Democreep Party. Secular Jews really do vote like Puerto Ricans and live like WASPs.

The quadumvirate of nation-destroying demographics is therefore: Jews, single White women, homos, and nonWhites. As it ever was (except in Israel).

And don’t expect this trend to reverse or even slow down. As long as the White marriage rate continues falling and the age of first marriage continues rising, the numbers of single White bitterbitches in the population will explode, and with their growing numerical electoral power the decline and death of America is sure to follow.

Make America Great Again (MAGA) should be closely paired with Who Bitch This Is (WBTI), if we seek the salvation of our country.

Read Full Post »