“This American Life” Shitlibs Get Their Testosterone Levels Tested

…and the results cause the men to burst into tears.

Via his poasting career, one of the funniest stories I’ve read this year.

After all of the usual caveats (unemployed T levels higher than employed T levels, testosterone does not correlate with success, etc) and complete blackout of obvious confounding bix noody variables we get to the point:

It turns out that the gay Jew has the highest testosterone level at 274. The other four men are clustered around half of that (144)

“In general, the normal range in males is about 270 to 1070 ng/dL with an average level of 679 ng/dL. A normal male testosterone level peaks at about age 20, and then it slowly declines.”

144. Male shitlibs are LITERALLY low T manlets.

One thing that jumped out at me, though, was the longing for normalcy. The two of the three women wanted to be low testosterone and feminine. The (almost uniformly whiny) straight(ish) men wanted to be high T. Even in the heart of poz. As creeped out as I was by the entire segment, I managed to extract a tiny grain of hope.

Hope or not, though, after listening to this segment I needed to move leg day up to lift away the poz.

Biomechanics is God, and He rules over even self-deluding shitlibs.

Lift away the poz. gentlemen. Your balls will grow three sizes with every new 1 rep max at the squat rack. Then you can enjoy the whiny spectacle of a sniveling, sneering leftoid disingenuously snark about why you want White men to be more aggressive like black men.

Read Full Post »

Dr. Root, Sex Therapist, Takes Your Questions

Chateau Heartiste is proud to host, with our co-sponsor NPR, an interview with famed sex therapist, Dr. Root. Full audio of the interview can be found here.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Thanks for joining us. I’m Caitlynnneee Jenner. Dr. Root collects turtles. He says it’s because they stick their necks out a lot the way his erection grows. It’s an attitude that’s worked well for him. Dr. Root joins us from the opium den of Chateau Heartiste in [REDACTED].

Dr. Root:

Next time you’re in New York, I want to have coffee with you.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Are you hitting on me, Dr. Root?

Dr. Root:

Yes, but only to get closer to your slutty coalburner step-daughters.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Oh haha… you! Dr. Root. His brand new book is titled “The Doctor Is In: Dr. Root On Love, Life, And Squirting Orgasms.” I want to know how you got to the United States and then went to work for Planned Parenthood.

Dr. Root:

I used to hit on girls in the Planned Parenthood waiting room.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Really! Why would you do such a thing?

Dr. Root:

Because vulnerable girls are more open sexually. Open to my sexual healing. It’s like unmarried bridesmaids at weddings and the grief-stricken at funerals. You’ve got to get them while they’re in a terrible emotional state, ready for anyone to come take their minds off the bad feels.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Let’s get to our listener questions. Here is an email for you, Dr. Root. And this could literally take hours to answer. She says, “How do you keep love alive?”

Dr. Root:

Don’t get fat.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Excuse me?

Dr. Root:

Yes, don’t get fat. And give your man plenty of blowjobs. That is the best way to keep his love alive. Just don’t expect much after two years or so, because men have a natural instinct to love many women.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Ooookayyy… We have an email here — no, a posting on Facebook — you see how things are changing — says, “Does it bother Dr. Root that there is so much hyper-sexualized dialog and innuendo on prime time television?”

Dr. Root:

The gay propaganda is over the top. And by that I don’t mean two gays kissing. I mean, two gays having a normal, healthy, monogamous relationship without weekly trips to the glory hole, followed by visits to the clinic for suturing anal fissures. When does that happen in real life?

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Oh my my. Isn’t that homophobic?

Dr. Root:

Nocturnal emissions.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Come again?

Dr. Root:

Exactly. By the way, isn’t it funny when I say nocturnal emissions with my accent? I’ll tell you something else, Bruce… er, Caitlynnneee… if we have time.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Surely.

Dr. Root:

I am very worried about college campuses saying that a woman and a man or two men or two women, but I talk right now about woman and man, can be in bed together, Caity, and at one time, naked, and at one time, he or she — most of the time they think she can say, I changed my mind. No such thing is possible. In the Talmud, in the Jewish tradition, it says when that part of the male anatomy is aroused, when there is an erection, the brain flies out of the head. And we have to take that very seriously.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Are you?…. are you suggesting… that women take personal responsibility for their actions? Dr. Root, that is beyond the pale.

Dr. Root:

But within the Pale of Settlement!

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Ok, moving on from college campuses, here’s a question about, perhaps, somewhat younger children from Lindsey Gayham in San Francisco, CA. Lindsey, you’re on the air.

Lindsey Gayham:

Hi. I saw Dr. Root years and years ago on a talk show and he said something I’ve never forgotten. I believe someone on the show had a question about a child sort of bouncing on one’s knee and becoming perhaps a bit too excited, but Dr. Root said the comment that we have to make genitals feel good. And in listening to his earlier comments, I’m thinking, I would like to ask him, do you ever see a day in which children will be more openly recognized as sexual human beings from birth? And what can we, as a society, do to sort of enable them or give them their own sexual rights or emancipation in a positive way?

{editorial break: I swear I am not making this up}

Dr. Root:

I want to tell you something. I’m old fashioned and a square. Children can feel sexual, there’s no question. Boys can have erections as babies, when they’re touched or when their diapers are being changed. Girls, when they’re touched, their clitoris can be aroused. Of course, it’s an autonomic response, devoid of anything resembling adult desire, so I’m afraid pedophiles like yourself will have a hard time rationalizing your urges to grope small children, but I suppose you can try. It’s 2015, anything is possible! Like gay marriage!

Dr. Root:

And it’s a good question, but I am, all of these years, have been rather old fashioned and a square. I tell parents careful not to walk around naked with buttplugs up your ass when there are teenagers in your home. Because the father, especially a biologically unrelated stepfather that the children’s whore slut single mom roped into a second marriage, could feel some kind of erector, some kind of feeling, and get a bottle of lube. How come he gets aroused when he sees his stepdaughter naked? Is it her pert tits, her firm round ass, her luscious lips and smooth skin? I’m not saying when somebody walks in, somebody takes a shower to make a big to do. But I believe in our culture, to make it separate and to be very careful, because that sexual drive, the sexual desire is a strong one. Leave the open air boobies hanging out to those tribes in National Geographic.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Dr. Root, I want to go back to what you were talking about before the break. That is, young people on college campuses and the concern about at what moment, being in an aroused situation, and then hearing the young woman saying no. What you’re saying is it’s already gone too far.

Dr. Root:

Women have their own language for arousal. Yes means yes. no means maybe, and maybe means yes, but after a few empty promises first. If a woman gets so drunk she can’t consent, she should think about not drinking so much if she wants to avoid morning-after regret. And don’t forget, Caitlynnneee, a drunk man can’t know if she’s given him her consent. So really, we should get the long arm of the law out of the bedrooms of horny college students with more hormones than wisdom.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

This advice isn’t going to sit well with campus feminists.

Dr. Root:

The only thing that sits well with campus feminists is a double-stuffed burrito. Have you seen them lately? Fat and so ugly! And with the purple hair! Really, between me and you and the rest of America, most of these rape hysterics are the fantasies of lonely women pretending they have to beat the men off with a stick.

Dr. Root:

And unintended pregnancies and that they cannot say at one time, at the height of arousal, just when he’s very aroused, strong erection, when she’s very aroused, either he or she cannot change their mind. I know it’s controversial, but I have to stand up and believe for what I believe in. I know it has something to do with Title 9, with money that goes to universities. I’m very worried about that. And people like you and me, who have this power, especially you right now on NPR, of the airwaves, do have to talk about that.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Indeed. I think that there is a great deal to what you say. This is my way of deflecting that NPR shitlibs like myself will never talk about that. Here’s an email Dr. Root, from John Scalzi in.. well how about that another one from San Francisco. He says, what are your thoughts on the transgender phenomenon and how cultures are or are not accepting transgender individuals? How do you see this evolving over time?

Dr. Root:

I have never been ashamed or worried by saying people who want to change their sex are mentally sick and emotionally combustible. It’s a good idea to refrain from encouraging their sickness.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

All right. Let’s go to… a bus depot rest room in San Francisco? Alex Pareene, you’re on the air.

Alex Pareene:

I’m a single guy. I have these internet dating apps and so on and so forth. And it seems like it’s given single people the attention span of goldfish. And I don’t know what you know about it, but I was just wondering what do you think the long term effects of these dating sites, like Tinder or Plenty of Fish or any of that. What do you think that has, you know, what the future holds for that?

Dr. Root:

Easy, atomized sex. Hard relationships. Fertility crashes. Civilization implosion. But be careful, use protection. As long as you do that, no problem.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Here’s an email that says, “my wife and I are in a difficult place. We love each other. She says she’s attracted to me, but has no interest in being amorous with me, because she does not feel emotionally connected. I feel that being amorous with each other is one way to help rebuild the emotional connection. But I don’t want to press the issue for fear of driving her away even further. Do you have any thoughts on how we can bridge this gap?”

Dr. Root:

Yes, you are a beta male. You have to be less of a beta male and more of an alpha male. Your wife isn’t doing this intentionally. Her arousal isn’t something she can control. It has to be stimulated. Oh yes, I know I’m a sex therapist, but “talking it out” is absolutely the worst thing you can do. It will dry her pussy right up, like a slug under a salt shaker. Be more demanding, be less kind and generous, be cocky and confident, tease her, make fun of her, leave for indeterminate spells, and flirt with other women in her presence. Then your wife will come around to loving you again.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Mother of god…

Dr. Root:

No, I am the father of god.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

On the other hand, if she says I don’t want to see a therapist, he should go by himself, shouldn’t he?

Dr. Root:

If he’s a mangina of small testicle, yes. Or, if the therapist is a sexy woman and he wants to boff her, then he should go see her.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

All right, and here is a posting on Facebook. What about the phenomenon of the “Fifty Shades of Gray” franchise? Where is the line between healthy and unhealthy in role playing and fantasy like the against my will fantasy, that’s actually consensual? On the other hand, we are hyper-vigilant about criminal rape on campus and elsewhere. And on the other, we supposedly agree that power exchange role playing is a normal and exciting thing in sexuality.

Dr. Root:

Torture-rape porn for women.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Women like this?

Dr. Root:

Women get aroused by the thought of submitting to a powerful, dominant man. Women are sexually charged by their vulnerability and submission, but only to a man worthy of taking it from them.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Why the S&M aspect?

Dr. Root:

Arousal amplification.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

This is all so… refreshing. Exciting. For me to hear. MmmmMMmmmm….

Dr. Root:

Ta Nahisi Coates! Safety word! Ta Nahisi Coates!

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Sorry. Ok, where were we. Let’s go now to Witch’s Coven, Massachusetts. Amanda Marcotte, you’re on the air.

Amanda Marcotte:

Hi. Yes, I wanted to first thank Dr. Root, because as I was coming of age, she was on a lot of the talk shows and in the news a lot, and gave me a different perspective on being able to explore and to ask questions about and not feel ashamed about questioning different things. But also, I wondered what her opinion was on the, especially with millennials, but with each successive generation, the disconnect from intimate acts and emotional bonds. That there’s quite a bit of not just one night stands, but one event relationships.

Dr. Root:

So I’m old fashioned and a square. I  don’t want to see more sexually transmitted diseases, if it’s different partners. Use protection! And shave your manjaw.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

You tell everyone to use protection. Is there more to sex therapy than that?

Dr. Root:

There is, but not for the close-minded NPR audience.

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

I am old fashioned and a square, as well. Let’s go, finally, to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. FrankNBeans, you’re on the air. Quickly, please.

FrankNBeans:

I have a question for you. I know you met Howard Stern recently. Maybe a year or two ago, and, you know, he is certainly kind of a force out there in the media world. But you know, by talking about sexuality and his small penis, to be specific, do you think he’s doing a good thing for the world of sexuality and men, in particular?

Dr. Root:

Bababooey? Ok, truthfully, Howard may have a small penis, but it doesn’t hurt him with the ladies. Last time I was on his show, he wanted to talk about something I didn’t want to talk about. My prehensile penis. He is very jealous of it. It’s a medical wonder, my penis. I can hit the G spot and cervical aperture with the same thrust!

Mz Caitlynnneee Jenner:

Wow just wow. That’s it folks. Lots of love and thanks for listening. I’m going to my John Stewart hurt locker to masturbate furiously under a poster of his vapid smirk.

Read Full Post »

The Denial Of Human Nature As A Barometer Of Societal Illness

Cuckservatives, leftoid equalists, and feminists all share a mental disorder in common: the habitual denial of human nature. The ways in which these groups deny human nature are far too numerous to list in one blog post, but commenter Tempus Fuckit (heh) tangentially reminds us of one way that often escapes the notice of even steely-eyed realists.

This. Hit. Hard.

My oneitis is currently on a career tankgrrl rampage (she’s 22)..

“My mom told me not to rely on a man for money.”

..to the grave.

The cultural embrace of the iconic gogrrl careerist femborg isn’t just a feminist and equalist rallying cry; one will often hear cuckservatives mouth the very same “encourage our young women to succeed in the workforce” platitudes that animate their supposed ideological opposites.

And now mothers. If the denial of human nature is a barometer of societal illness, then the wholesale acceptance and advocacy of the careegrrl lifestyle by mothers forecasts the arrival of some seriously inclement weather.

Platitudes like “don’t rely on a man for money” have a way of gripping less agile minds and taking hold for life. Superficially, it sounds sensible; one may convince oneself, “if men won’t commit and ‘man up’ for women, then women should take the necessary precautions against indigence and establish self-sustainable careers for themselves.”

The problem with this simplistic formulation originates in the faulty premise that men and women are alike in all ways but the genitalia. This flawed premise allows for the psychological projection of the female-specific predilection for receiving material support onto men; it tacitly assumes, in other words, that women are as comfortable providing for themselves (and for others) as men are, and that men will promptly abandon their intrinsic role as resource providers as soon as women agree in principle or practice to be dependent upon men.

The core plank of modern feminism — careergrrl empowerment — rests on a horrible misunderstanding of human, and especially male, nature. It’s a misunderstanding, deliberate or deluded, that follows from an arid, de-sexualized, transactional view of relations between men and women.

“If/Then” algorithms are shaky substitutes for human sexual market feedback loops. While transactional analysis of human behavior has some usefulness as a predictive model, it quickly reveals its limitations when we draw comparisons between the decision-making processes of the sexes. An error in thinking of this magnitude will result in wrong conclusions like the one above: That men are as fickle and uncertain about providing for women as women are about providing for men, and therefore women ought to ensure their own economic self-sufficiency.

The reality is much different once we account for continuously operating SMP feedback loops. The vulnerable unemployed or underemployed young woman arouses the natural instinct in men to provide for her and protect her against hardship. As long as she has the requisite physical attributes to catch men’s eyes, there will be more than enough (white or asian) men happy to share their hard-earned material abundance with her in implied exchange for her sex and love and fidelity.

This is what feminists, cuckservatives, and Narrative-soaked social scientists don’t get about the sexes: What one sex may do in response to a given stimulus is not necessarily what the other sex would do. Men possess a moral sense, (or a character trait, if you prefer less loaded language), that compels them to provide generously for pretty young women who prove their sexual loyalty and low partner count. Women don’t have this moral sense, not in the way it is used here. Women are eager to provide many things to the men they love — most of all their bodies — but they aren’t psychologically driven to transfer their own material resources to indigent men the way men are driven to lavish largesse on indigent, comely women. Women may do this when circumstances align just right, but it won’t come from a place of deep personal fulfillment from the act of doing so. It will come from a place, instead, brewing with resentment and confusion.

So, the career tankgrrl’s mom is wrong. Tankgrrl, assuming she has the goods to attract a sufficient number of decent resource-ready men, should rely on men for money, because men are happy, indeed driven as if by some otherworldly force, to give to women for whom they feel intense physical desire and love.

Once Tankgrrl has stopped relying on men for money… once she has traveled far down the road of invulnerable feminist empowerment, leaning in the whole way… she should not be surprised to find that fewer and fewer men along each mile marker are waiting and willing to give to her what she has already given to herself.

Feminism, in this way, becomes a self-fulfilling whine. The more feminist a woman gets, the more men will retreat from her, and the more her feminist man-hating will seem like the appropriate response to her romantic failures.

There will be exceptions, of course. There always are when human nature is the topic. Ugly or old women may really have no choice but to become financially viable on their own, and for them a healthy society recognizes their need of taking the “feminist” path. But a healthy society would never elevate those exceptions to a 24/7 propaganda blitz, insisting that every woman follow the same life script as those poor unfortunate souls who have no choice in the matter.

As always, it comes down to exalting beauty, rejecting ugliness, and living not by lies.

Read Full Post »

The Wall Is Everywhere

From a United Nations report, a chart of the prices that ISIS charges for concubines.

*Children between ages 1 and 9 includes boys.

Even if this is exaggerated neocon propaganda, the trend illuminated by the chart is likely authentic, because an ur-feminist organization like the UN would not be given to propagandizing the low sex slave worth of 40+ year old women.

There are some universal truths about the nature of the sexes exposed through revealed preferences (and pricing) that even primitive barbarians can find common ground with effete Westerners.

Read Full Post »

Oneitis And The Wall: The Two Most Important Life Lessons You Can Impart To Your Sons And Daughters

Mitch Cumstein has a story about a careergrrl nursing pained regret that, while entertaining on its own, contains within it an eternal truth that CH house lords thought proper to feature and expand upon.

Off-topic…a career woman ghost story I thought CH and the readership would enjoy.

I ran into my ex at a party a few days ago. I haven’t seen her in a couple years, but she moved back into town. We used to date and she was into me, but she had to pursue her dreamz out of state. Career woman heh. We did the long distance thing for a couple months before it fizzled out. I wasn’t happy, but I found this site and used it to shed my beta ways over time. I learned to become detached and implemented tips and suggestions here to hook up with other girls. I even used them successfully on the ex a few times to hook up when she was in town, but only until it got boring for me.

So at the party, I was civil and brief. When I got home, I got a text from her, saying how great it was to see me. I texted back, “I did look good, didn’t I?” She ate it right up. Kept texting me for the next day or so, until I dropped the hint that I’m seeing someone and it’s serious. She went silent for about an hour. And then, a string of text bombs.

“I’m afraid that no one will ever love me like you did. When I was younger, I thought career was the most important thing (she was 23), but now, I know better (now she’s 29).” “I fucked up my life by choosing my career and now I only do it in hopes that it pays off somehow.” I poured myself a drink and just watched the confessions pile in. The last one was, “If you wanted to elope this weekend, I would do it.”

Years ago, I was devastated that I lost this snowflake. Fast forward to today, I sit amused as the clock is running out and she’s throwing hail Mary passes. I’m going to take the screen grabs, print them out, and show them to my future kids. To my sons: a lesson about oneitis. Life goes on. Half the people on the planet are women. Find a better one. To my daughters: a lesson about The Wall. It’s real and hits like a motherfucker. Play the game wisely and don’t be left without a chair when the music stops.

Don’t let any mincing manlet tell you otherwise; it feels good to have hand. Power always beats powerlessness.

Now, to the real gem in this post: Oneitis and The Wall. There are many lessons to teach your son or daughter, but these two are the most important for their future happiness. These are lessons that only a father can teach, because, quite frankly, mothers are constitutionally incapable of dispensing useful dating advice to their children, particularly to their sons. Restating Mitch:

Fathers, teach your sons about Oneitis. If there’s one lesson in love that will do them immeasurable good, it’s the belief that girls are interchangeable, at least during the time when a courtship is fresh and finding its footing. Later, when your son graduates to more serious relationships, he can learn to be more selective about the character, personality, and maternal instinct of the women he games into bed woos.

Oneitis is truly the mind killer of men. Besides all the time wasted on THAT ONE GIRL who knows she’s THAT ONE GIRL and parcels her weakly reciprocated interest accordingly, there is the psychological damage Oneitis perpetrates against a young man’s self-conception. Oneitis is the opposite of that crucial alpha male attitude to cultivate: The abundance mentality. Your son will never have that “TAKE HER OR LEAVE HER” attitude that is so intoxicating to women if he pops a years-long hard-on for the red-haired girl with the jerk boyfriend.

Fathers, tell your sons, “Don’t get hung up on this one girl. I know what you’re feeling… I’ve been there. And I’m telling you from experience that you’ll be far better off, and feel so much happier, if you allow more women into your life, and don’t put so much of your faith and hopes in any one of them.”

After teaching your son about Oneitis, teach him about Game.

Fathers, teach your daughters about The Wall. So much regret, spinsterhood, low fertility, and smelly cats can be avoided if young women are sternly and firmly warned against the danger of waiting too long for the right man. Use stark, unsparing language, if necessary. You’d be surprised how much of what you say sinks into their minds, even if in the moment they appear to not be hearing you at all.

Daughters must be cautioned to USE IT OR LOSE IT. Tell her with uncompromising bluntness that she is pretty now, and all the boys notice her, but her prettiness will disappear faster than she knows (or can possibly know at her tender age), and there will come a time, always much sooner than she had hoped, when none of the boys will notice her. And when that time comes, if she doesn’t have a loving husband by then, the rest of her life will be a horrifying trial of inescapable sorrow.

After teaching your daughter about The Wall, teach her about jerkboys and niceguys, and how you know she’ll fall hard for the former, but she must seriously consider giving the less exciting boys a shot, and to be patient with them as their self-confidence grows into adulthood. Tell her, if she does fall deeply in love with a jerkboy, to be certain he is the kind of jerkboy willing to commit to her, and to be aware of the other kind of jerkboy who will most certainly break her heart, if not her body, and leave her less attractive to better men after he is gone.

Read Full Post »

Sexbot Update

Chateau Heartiste was the first warning about consequences from the coming sexbot revolution, and how it will radically distort the sexual market and push the West into chaos.

Today, a chorus of voices from various scientific fields are echoing what CH wrote long ago. “Sex with robots will be the norm in 50 years”, expert claims. 3D printed models can make a sexbot face that looks exactly like your favorite hottie.

(The reader who supplied the links comments: “This will blow up the world.  It will make crack cocaine look like decaffeinated coffee.”)

Soon, sexbots will be animated and be able to talk (programmable with your preferred phrases of sexy come-ons).

Once the uncanny valley is ascended, all bets are off. As men are, above all else, visually stimulated to reproductive ardor, sexbots present a real challenge to flesh and blood women and, ultimately, to the sustaining of civilization.

***

I foresee a massive groundswell of support for polygamy & polyamory coinciding with the widespread introduction of affordable sexbots to the consumer (male) market. It’s hard to predict if this outcome — that is, the complete removal from the dating market of omega and lesser beta males — will be dysgenic or eugenic, because women could just as plausibly want to share callous, undependable jerkboys as to share morally sterling, credentialed alpha male captains of industry. Then, in a sexbot saturated world, the pressure on women to look their very best for the few men left in the dating market who are still suitable mates will be immense.

***

MT avers,

Loyal companionship, his cheerleader, heart of the home, a submissive nature to compliment his naturally dominate one, soft heartedness and in the words of the comedian Sinbad, his nurse when he is elderly. Attributes a fembot cannot give.

True (well, mostly true, but things change). However, female beauty is necessary if not sufficient to men’s romantic happiness, especially to men with sexual market options (and sexbots would add a lot more options). Female beauty is not just necessary to men’s happiness, it is dominating, over every other consideration a man would make when evaluating women for both short- and long-term mate worth. Stone cold truth: A typical American fatty with attitude to spare has no chance against a sexbot with a pretty face, a slender BMI, and a perfect hourglass shape.

***

latchkey kid asks,

what if women also take to acquiring male bots to satisfy their womanly wants? After all, it’s not uncommon for them to say that all the good men have gone, they might as well start having a bit of artificial action like men do with them bots.

Male sexbots for women will never happen, at least not to the degree that female sexbots for men fly out of the factories. For a simple reason: Women’s sexual and romantic desire is not nearly as visually-oriented as it is for men. Just one of those uncomfortable truths about immutable differences between the sexes that market disruptors like sexbots help clarify for the masses.

***

Prediction: The vast majority of sexbots produced for worldwide male consumption will be White women with a diverse palette of hair colors. Asian women sexbots will compete with Latin women sexbots for second place. I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader which race of women will be least represented among the ranks of assembly-line sexbots. Hint: Black male sexbots will probably outsell this last category.

Read Full Post »

Sexist Men Are Quite Literally Winners, Common Sense (And ♂SCIENCE♂) Finds

Vapid shell entity Caitlin Dewey is at it again, snarkily uptalking in her late Millennial patois and squirting out mental masturbation material for bitter feminists left behind by a merciless sexual market. She links to a study which found that male Halo players who were losing the video game badly were aggressively hostile to female players and aggressively submissive to better male players.

Dewey uses the “””findings””” that are a little too conveniently friendly to feminist shibboleths to grind her cunty battle axe. Unfortunately for her religious tenets, the study is so flawed as to make it nearly self-debunking.

Nowhere in the linked source for the study did I see a reference to ages or races of the study participants. Were these all white kids trash talking what they thought were female teammates who were letting the team down? Or was there an unfortunate racial skew the study researchers felt disinclined to note?

And what about the ages of the male players? 12 years old, or 25 years old? This makes a huge difference. No one should be surprised when a 12-year-old boy lashes out at UGH GIRLS. But these natural and normal development behaviors of boys tend to dissipate by adulthood.

Here’s an ugly scientific and common-sensible truth with which the Caitlin Deweyettes of the SJW world should acquaint themselves: Sexist men are more attractive to women. Or, in urban SWPL ditz parlance, sexist men are QUITE LITERALLY winners.

Here’s a quote that will simultaneously trigger Caitlin’s man-hating ego and jerkboy-loving vagina.

And, in what is sure to be a shot straight to the flabby feminist gut, women are more sexually receptive to assertively sexist men.

Sexist men are socioeconomic winners and sociosexual winners. Women LOVE LOVE LOVE men who scoff at feminist poopytalk.

Now, this is not an endorsement of the 12-year-old boy variety of hostility to women. The sexist adult men who win women’s hearts are best classified as “benevolent sexists”; that is, they aren’t hostile to women; they are patronizing to women. Chicks dig a man with amused mastery. You know what chicks don’t dig, in the digging way that truly matters? Avowed male feminists sucking up to them at every turn.

Read Full Post »