Our Credentialed White Woman Problem

"College-educated Republican women are extinct" https://t.co/ay7eoCyJBU pic.twitter.com/LBRftr15V3

— Virginia Postrel (@vpostrel) August 2, 2018

#RepealThe19th

This is what runaway credentialism does to our naturally suck-up White women: turns them into Gay Mulatto adoring, poz-pushing, miscegenating White man-haters willing to trash their nation and turn it into a gibs depot for the world’s filth just to get a virtue sniveling tingle in their cooches.

Thankfully, this mental illness is largely confined to over-credentialed White women (I wish this data had been further broken down by marital status). If Trump is to keep winning, he needs a message that appeals to working class women as well as to men. The credentialed battlecunt vote is lost to him; best we can do on Trumperica’s behalf is mock these cat ladies in waiting, shame them for their vapid beliefs, and ridicule their sanctimony. Women do feel the hot burn of shame far more powerfully than do men; a shaming campaign can pay big dividends.

Why do credentialed White broads hate Trump? An MPCer thinks media capture is primarily to blame.

This is the media capture effect.  100% of mainstream political media is anti-Trump, and it hits women hardest.

College educated women listen to NPR and read the NYT.  If they’re Republican-leaning they may possibly watch Fox News instead of CNN, but more likely neither.  Even the Republican-leaning women still listen to NPR.  The Anti-Trump message on all of this media is that supporting Trump is not even something that needs to be rationally considered.  Only damaged people like Trump.

This tells on normal women.  Plenty of these women would like to support Trump and not vote to sell out their country, but they need social cover for it.  There need to be more normal women on TV and the media talking about the bread and butter reasons to support Trump.  Jobs, the economy, and protecting what we’ve got from foreign competition are all things to emphasize.  Some way, some how, we have to get images of normal women supporting Trump onto the television.

Also, while banging hot women on the side may have helped JFK/Clinton with the average single unmarried Democrat woman, it doesn’t help Trump so much with the average married Republican woman.

Credentialed White Women (CWW) need to be weaned off the Talmudvision. Ripples in their comfortable conformism can eventually effect sea changes in attitude. For instance, ask a CWW at your local airport to remove CNN from the TVs; tell her you don’t want to hear “Fake News”. If she objects, laugh in her face and snort “typical”.

Media capture includes social expectation bias. Some, maybe 5 or 10%, of these CWWs telling survey takers they are voting Democreep are lying to avoid social ostracism from the spinsterhood. I doubt that explains all of the trend, though.

A more potent explanation is that CWWs have come to despise their available White men. These cunts are surrounded on their college campuses by squadrons of soyboys. They resent these un-men and transfer their resentment onto Trump and the shitlord men who support him.

Some of (((their))) resentment is aimed at married White women and popular “Beckys” (a generic term for a psychologically and physically attractive White woman who supports Trump and loves masculine men).

Adding fuel to the CWW rush to anti-Trump and anti-White conformism is the fact that US colleges have become far less discriminatory over the last two decades. Admissions standards have been lowered to accommodate Diversity™ and incoming hordes of White women who want to major in Gender Fluidity and Whorenalism. Colleges are 60+% female, and the sex skew is getting worse, stoking a bitterness in female students who want to nuptially land an educated Chad but find they have to compete with prettier girls just to get a one night stand. Romantic frustration is another culprit pushing CWWs away from sanity and toward Globohomoism.

Which leads to a point I’ve made many times on this blog: when women remain unmarried but economically self-sufficient, they vote for anyone who will strengthen the power of Sugar Daddy Government at the expense of White beta male providers. Government becomes not only a beta provider substitute, but also an outlet for CWWs to vent their spite and signal their loyalty to the gynarcho-tyranny.

The loss of the early-wedded homemaker, in both numbers and status, has created a perverse economic incentive for the CWW who wants cheap consumer products and indentured servants to release her from labor-intensive routine household chores and child-rearing that used to fill a big part of the day of un-credentialed White women, before the DEGREE UP AND LEAN IN, YASS QUEENS ideology took a hold of their imaginations. Throwing more government money at these CWWs isn’t going to solve the problem of them aligning with Globohomo; in the long term it will only intensify their disloyalty to their White men.

The CWW problem isn’t fixed until women have “skin in the game” again. Women have to feel like they are in this together with their men, and that any President and any policies which benefit their men also benefits the women. This means a return to the benevolent patriarchy of America at her height, when sex roles and sex differences were celebrated instead of bitterly cursed like they are today.

Read Full Post »

Female Sexuality Requires More Social Controls Than Does Male Sexuality

A Gabber prompts the title of this post with the following thought experiment,

It is also more important to control women’s sexuality than men’s sexuality.

Hypothetical;
A tribe of 100 men and 100 women.
You control the sexuality of 99 men and 1 woman? You get 99 single mothers.
You control the sexuality of 1 man and and 99 women? You get 1 single mother.

A perfectly illustrative hypothetical. About the only edit I would make is to account for female hypergamy: in the second scenario, the one unconstrained woman would choose the apex alpha (if her appearance was sufficiently arousing to allow her the choice) and ignore the remaining 98 men granted freedom of sexuality. You’d still get a single mom, though, because that apex alpha would be set upon by the 98 blue-balled betas who would kill him (if they didn’t also kill her infant in the way usurping lions are wont to do).

This is why White Knights are so fucking stupid to attempt their pedestal polishing within the context of a society that has removed all constraints on female sexuality (while retaining shame-based restrictions on male sexuality). These goobers practiced in the brute art of thot enabling are unwittingly abetting and exacerbating social dysfunction and atomized sexual market transactionalism.

It’s not a coincidence that the single mommery rate rose to heights previously unimagined in America at the same time the abolishment of social controls on women released free ranging vagina on the land.

It’s unturtling gashes all the way down.

Read Full Post »

Female Obesity And Radical Sex Skew In The Dating Market

Sex skews can have profound impacts on sexual market behavior. The scarcer sex gets to dictate the terms of engagement. Generally, more women than men means more cads and tramps, fewer dads and damsels. While more men than women means this:

Western societies, particularly in America, have currently operative sexual markets which strongly indicate sex skews that favor women: dull-looking egomaniacal attention whores holding out for apex alphas. Western Men are noticing. From farmlegend,

CH: “But the hourglass-shaped, slender, feminine woman is a vanishing breed, and fat chicks are so disgusting that men will bang a strident, chisel-jawed, hipless careercunt with 3% body fat because the alternative — spelunking neck deep into the smegma swamp of a quintuple-folded labia-rinth — is so ghastly.”

Couple things –
In my day, “curvy” meant Sophia Loren, Racquel Welch. In 2018 America, any overfed warpig with a beer gut, flabby batwings and pendulous tits can proudly call herself “curvy” and no one bats an eye.

Another thing about the America of my yute – a plain-faced, hipless, titless gal was practically invisible in the SMP, and would have considered herself fortunate to snag a dull, hardworking average dude for marriage and babymaking. The obesity epidemic has radically transformed the social value of these types of women, and they can and do get away with behaving like entitled queens near the apex of the pyramid. I personally know of a few women in my orbit of acquaintances that fit this description, and the amount of attention they get from the ravenous horde of thirsty men is unreal – they get approached all the damned time, shit test and flake like it’s goin’ out of style, and sneer at the effrontery of men that show her interest who aren’t 6’3” and studly.

I’ve written about this topic before: female obesity has a huge impact on the practicable sexual market:

there is another, MASSIVE factor at work skewing the sexual market, and one that, just as unsurprisingly, gets almost no attention from the PC-soaked punditariat: female obesity.

Imagine you are an unmarried working class dude recently unemployed. You look around you and marvel at a sea of grotesquely misshapen fat women, rolls upon rolls of undulating flesh hiding stores of cheesy poofs, porky hellion spawn trailing their wakes, chins resting atop chins, bloated diabetic cankles stomping the Walmartian grounds like lumbering elephants. In some towns, close to 40% of the available single women are clinically OBESE.

This is obesity folks, not just overweight. Overweight women are physically repulsive, but obesity renders them monstrous. To clarify this assertion for the modern indoctrinated female reader: an obese woman is as sexually undesirable to men as a jobless, charmless, humorless, enfeebled, dull man is sexually undesirable to women.

So back to our realistic scenario: Our typical unmarried working class man surveys his cellulite-blasted kingdom (and it does not matter how fat he, himself, is, for fat men and thin men alike prefer the exquisite sight of slender female bodies), and he makes a quick hindbrain calculation. Does he bust his ass in a crappy service sector job doing women’s work for a shot at legally bound long-term commitment to a shuffling shoggoth dragging the bastard spawn of a hundred alpha males in tow, or does he say “fuck it” and turn to video games and porn featuring hot, thin chicks for his status and dopamine fix?

Sex skew doesn’t necessarily have to be purely birth-ratio numerical in character; a functional sex skew can exist anywhere the BANGABLE population of one sex outnumbers the bangable population of the other sex. Given the inherent nature of the sexes — expensive eggs, cheap sperm, female perishability, male expendability — there will under normal circumstances and in most places and times be fewer bangable women than bangable men, but additional, novel factors can push that ingrained female-favored skew closer or further from favoring women.

Gross, boundless obesity — an evolutionary novel factor if ever there was one — negatively affects female bangability more than it does male bangability, so a high rate of female obesity would in practice reduce further the number of bangable women available to men, creating a “dads and damsels” sexual market of fewer women and more men that mirrors a numerically shifted sexual market in which male live births greatly outnumbered female live births. The tilted playing field would tilt even more against men, from all the fat women standing at one end of it.

In short, widespread (heh) female obesity means women can call the shots, and the less-fat the woman, the more shots she can call and the louder and more obnoxious her calls. Sex-skewing obesity has a downstream effect on the sexual market that influences the decision-making process of every woman, slender and larded alike, so that even the plain janes and the bangable-by-black-man-standards chubsters strut and preen like the past HB8s of a better, thinner America. Meanwhile, a present day HB8 has so many options and love-parched lickspittles fanning her with online flattery that she leverages her power to convince an alpha male to accept exclusivity and nagging before he’s ready (if she’s forward-thinking), or she squanders her prime lubricity years on the cock carousel laboring under the well-fed delusion that she has all the time in the world and a limitless, uninterrupted menu of alpha males eager to save a ho and pay through the nose for the privilege of it.

The picture is complicated (for the worse) by the fact that “dads and damsels” aren’t the sole manifestations of a female obesity-skewed sex market that favors women. Scarce slender pussy can just as easily mean more men dropping out of the dating market rather than “dadding up”, especially if conditions in the dating field are such that actively or attitudinally chaste, pleasantly feminine damsels remain in short supply, which as anyone looking at Current Year Cuntery can readily ascertain they are. And “dropping out” becomes a lot more tolerable to men if they have the horniness release valve of hardcore online porn, to be supplemented (very soon) with lifelike HB10 sexbots.

None of this state of affairs, btw, is conducive to maintaining, let alone building, civilization. But we won’t learn this lesson until it’s too late. It is required.

Solve the female obesity pandemic and you solve countless associated ailments suppressing the innate greatness of European Christendom.

LOSE A FUPA, SAVE OUR FUTURE
GOODBYE MUFFINTOP, AMERICA’S BACK ON TOP

Read Full Post »

Fatty Vs Manjaw

How badly do men want slender babes? farmlegend writes,

“A lot of men I know are attracted to the super-skinny girls with boy bodies and it’s kind of sickening, tbh.”

Again, it has to do with the obesity epidemic, which has rendered most of the non-prepubescent-boy-figured women to being unfuckable landwhales. Manjawed hipless women have become damn near the only game in town in my town.

Yes I think farmlegend gets at the truth of it. Nonblack men are repulsed by fat women, and will do anything to avoid bedding down with a fatty, even if that means the only non-fatty options are skinny boy-hipped androgynes.

Men aren’t attracted to skinnyfat tubes. But the hourglass-shaped, slender, feminine woman is a vanishing breed, and fat chicks are so disgusting that men will bang a strident, chisel-jawed, hipless careercunt with 3% body fat because the alternative — spelunking neck deep into the smegma swamp of a quintuple-folded labia-rinth — is so ghastly.

There is no end to the ways the obesity crisis uglifies society. Slenderizing our women should be a national intervention.

Read Full Post »

I See M2F Trannies E V E R Y W H E R E

earl comments about a strange disturbance in the American sexual market:

‘Your “tight young hotties” with lean muscle mass, flat asses, long legs, thigh gap, and washboard abs are mostly MTF transgenders with fake tits and makeup’

It’s just as possible they are females jacking up on roids too.

In any case just look at how the hips sway…the pelvic bones of men and women are too vastly different to change with hormones.

Look I don’t buy the wacky m2f conspiracy theories, but I do see a lot of women in the big blue cities with boy hips. It’s unsettling. And there are enough of them that it’s very noticeable, and not just background noise in a sea of shitlibs. Something’s fucking with the sexual polarity, and we men of European Christendom have a duty to find out and fix it. Make Women Women Again.

So many possible explanations. Was a generation of masculinized women born circa early 1990s, manifesting an unconscious “Gaia-esque” evolutionary response to an environment that had radically changed to reward aggrocunts and their soyboy lapdogs? Or is there an environmental toxin that it fucking with the biological development of modren shitlib wahmen?

Maybe earl is right. More women are taking steroids, or the pharmaceutical equivalent. (I doubt that could account for the total surge in phenotypic she-males.) Roids are known to produce rapid fat loss. The obesity crisis could have encouraged more roid use among boardroom chasing broads who know that fatness is a signifier of proleness, which is a perception worse than death to your average SWPL status whore.

Of course, steroids robs women of their softness, which is a critical component of their femininity, replacing it with a carved hardness and a six pack that will kill boners dead.

Ironsides adds,

Possibility #3: women with boy hips always been there, but due to looking, dressing, and acting feminine in all other ways, it was simply overlooked. Now they’re projecting ersatz-masculinity so their narrow hips get noticed as we naturally attempt to spot other features matching up to their battlecunt persona.

If this is true, then the evolutionary explanation becomes plausible, because it would require multiple generations of sexual selection to produce a significant subpopulation of Born Trannies among all female births. Maybe that is happening, as post-agrarian modren life has been with us long enough to create peculiar envirocultural pressures that have increased the reproductive fitness of masculinized women. (sounds unlikely, and unstable over the long term)

And yes, feel free to shudder at the thought. Earth Androgyne is not exactly my idea of human progress. District Gine Hermaphrodystopia is the side of history that we’re careening towards.

Read Full Post »

Why Women Oppose Male Reproductive Rights

From Mabui,

When in a social setting with mothers, suggest that all children should be checked for paternity at birth to prevent paternity fraud, observe the various mothers’ reactions. Some get a very guilty expression. Listen to the various rationalizations. If they are married and husband is in the room they also seem to censor themselves. Last time I did this a mother whose children don’t resemble her husband came up with “Well it has happened for thousands of years and we all got along just fine without DNA tests.”

LOL the old “royal we” hamsterization.

Lady, for thousands of years women reproduced at twice the rate of men. Do you want to go back to that way of doing things (say goodbye to civilization)?

I’m sure there were plenty of men throughout human history who not only aired their grievances about uncertain paternity, but killed the women they suspected of cuckoldry and dashed the bastard infant on the rocks. “We” got along fine? Doubtful. “Women” got along fine with cuckoldry…yes, that’s true. Women subconsciously want that Mr Meaty Intrusion Alpha Fux option available to them in case Mr Vegetable Lasagna Beta Bux makes the mistake of leaving her alone for a few days to go on a hunting excursion.

Now that paternity assurance tests are here and affordable, women suddenly aren’t so keen on extending full reproductive rights to men. How utterly predictable!

If you think the sexual market is in chaotic flux now, just wait until paternity testing becomes widespread. A de facto paternity assurance institution will wonderfully focus the distaff mind.

Read Full Post »

What Men Want: “Debt-Free Virgins Without Tattoos”

The quote in this post’s title is from a woman.

Is she wrong?

(h/t jeangray07)

speaking of big truths, this woman is getting ripped to shreds on Facebook for dropping some truth bombs

The authoress, Lori Alexander, tackles the subject from a Christian perspective:

Do you know how much more attractive debt-free virgins (without tattoos) are to young men? Unfortunately, there are so few of these types of young women anymore because of the high costs of college (debt) and sexual promiscuity even within those in the church. As believers in Jesus Christ, we need to live in a way that is pleasing to Him because His ways are the best. He calls debt a burden and urges us to live lives of sexual purity.

There are many more reasons why Christian young women should carefully consider whether or not they go to college, especially if they want to be wives and mothers someday. Secular universities teach against the God of the Bible and His ways. It’s far from what God calls women to be and do: it teaches them to be independent, loud, and immodest instead of having meek and quiet spirits.

She is right, because the New Testament of Jesus is basically age-old wisdom about the Darwinian nature of the sexes wrapped in religious symbolism. But I prefer to skip the middleman and go straight to the helical chaser.

Men prefer debt-free virgins without tattoos because

1. debt indicates indulgence and low self-restraint, qualities that correlate with sluttiness (as well as being a golddigger)
2. tattoos similarly indicate indulgence and impulsivity, also correlating with sluttiness (tats are cues for casual sex availability, which in a woman is opposed to her commitment worthiness. aesthetically, tats obscure and disfigure the clear, supple skin of prime fertility babes)
3. sluttiness is unattractive to a man who is looking for a relationship (slutty women can’t be trusted)
4. virginity in and of itself is attractive to men because it indicates a woman who has not become jaded and befouled from riding the cock carousel, a woman who will more easily fall deeply in love with her “first and only” man (for she has little to compare him too — see: alpha widowhood), and a woman who can be better trusted to remain faithful and therefore guarantee a father’s paternity should the two decide to commit and have kids
5. not to mention, virginity means a tight twat, which is extremely pleasurable to a man

Anyhow, I’m glad that Christian housewives and Your Humble Heartiste can see eye to eye on the pressing issues of the day.

PS The fact that there are vanishingly few adult-aged American Woman virgins just means the few virgins there are get to enjoy sky high value on the marriage market. Work it, chasties!

Read Full Post »