Archive for the ‘Comment Winners’ Category

COTW winner is Elmer Jack, with a trilogy of comments that earned a place logged into the CH guest book.

Feminism is about women who are low on the mating desirability scale ruining the chances for attractive young women to have fulfillment, which they say is to be found in the sterile carpeting, crappy chairs, exhausting commutes, and pre-landfill cubicle partitions that define the totalitarian architecture of Encorpera. Of course feminists don’t know what they are talking about since few actually slog through a career outside of academia. For no feminist offers young women the sensible advice to get an education they can use later in life, find a husband early, bear children, and enter the workforce after their children have grown. Now more than ever with the advent of the internet and online education do people have the opportunities to acquire marketable skills and seek work. You can always get a job and you can start a business or career after the age of 40.


Peter Drucker, in his famous essay Managing Oneself, advised strongly the need to understand your strengths and weaknesses, and observed that you can never win by improving your weaknesses, only by improving your strengths. In broader socio-economic terms, feminism has pressured women to build on their weaknesses (ability to compete against men) and discouraged them from capitalizing on their strengths (youth and fertility). Young women have taken up this mantra to the extreme as their innate herd behavior has driven millions of them dominate universities and commit to a life of cubicle drudgery over hearth and home. They would rather have a crappy job with vicious co-workers that provides them money to spend on frivolities than a humble home domain where they rule and experience the joy of children. It is unfortunate that so many of our most intelligent and well-bred women are buying into this lie only to discover just 10 years after starting that they have missed the boat on marriage and childbearing opportunities. Adding to this cruel feminist hoax inflicted on impressionable women, some companies make a spectacle of offering to freeze their female worker’s eggs so they can devote their youth to the corporation and attempt childbirth long after the ideal window for this has passed. This is not to imply that women should not be educated; a woman should have an education as a financial backup and to use after child-rearing.


So we have weakened society as a whole by building on women’s weaknesses in attempts to make them the equal of men, rather than encouraging them in their natural strengths. And while this charade is going on, men are encouraged to adopt feminine attitudes and lifestyles at the expense of their own natural strengths, now deemed unnecessary in the new gender-neutral economy. The impact on our society appears in plummeting marriage rates, childless women, fatherless children, inflated home prices, and exploding credit card debt. To cope with the pressures of competing against men as well as their own female competitors, an astonishing 25% of working women are on anti-depressants. While companies make a big deal out of their zero-tolerance drug policies, their female workforce is higher than a kite on prescription medications.

For whatever impact feminization is having on women themselves, it means something else : you have a huge demographic of talented competitors who control the hiring process, are being given advantages over you for job assignments, against whom you cannot fight as you would any other man, and who ultimately promote our downward economic spiral by occupying non-productive tasks while avoiding the risk-taking that is required to stimulate job creation.

And if that’s not bad enough, many male hiring managers and CEOs are eager to place women simply because the women are attractive or they themselves have daughters. These men, usually married, seek to increase their odds for workplace romances either real or imagined as an escape hatch to their marital drudgery and suffocating corporate confines.

So much goodness packed into Elmer’s Jacked COTW. Recall the two demonic motivations of feminists:

  • To teach women to be second-rate men rather than first-rate women.
  • To remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality.

These two motivations are driven by ugliness, of both the outer and inner kinds.


Reader Chad earns a COTW second place showing.

Feminism like most leftist schemes does not aim at a goal; they are far too short-sighted to contemplate the consequences of their policies.

Feminism is analogous to any other leftist political scheme; they want to reap what they do not sow. Feminism attempts to allow a woman to enjoy all the trappings of being a woman while forcing the burdens associated with being a woman onto the general population. Essentially, feminists want absolute freedom of action while simultaneously being protected from any negative consequences of those actions.

It’s not hard to contemplate that any population that can fully insulate itself from reality will engage in activities that are naïve if not outright destructive. The resulting mentality of which is solipsism. A feminist woman could only assess a man as a means of fulfilling the female imperative.

Of course the left can only be a decent ally to this up to a point. Since leftism has devolved to the point where sex and gender are now subjective, the gains of feminism stand to be forfeited along with any notion of sexual identity.

It’s funny to think that in our bright new Fluidly Freaky Tranny Androgynous Slop culture the aspirations of feminism could be undermined by the very fruits of their gender-bending achievements. But it probably won’t go that way. If equalist leftoids have proven one thing about their ilk, it’s that they’re very good at changing the terms of debate when a logic trap looms.

Read Full Post »

COTW winner is tsparks156, cutting to the quick with his trenchant observation about one of the primary characteristics that distinguishes assholes from niceguys.

In my time I have seen many unfortunate nice guys that are lonely. I’m trying to remember if I have ever met a lonely asshole.

This sounds like the beginning of a beautiful country music tune.


COTW runner-up is shartiste, springboarding off the Ahmud hoax bomb story that has so animated shitlibs and President Butt Naked, to outline a general theory of cultural decline resulting from the equalist project of raising the Defective/Normal Ratio of society:

The scope and brazenness of this hoax speaks to how out of touch elites are with the common man. Yet it also gives hope. All the conspiracy theories about how these smart rich people masterfully control everything fail on one point: elites don’t truly understand what makes people tick, so they can never fully win hearts and minds of the masses. They will always have their defective cheerleaders: the fat and slutty, the eunuchs and gammas. But normal, typical people will see through these gambits. That is why the keystone strategy of liberals is to raise the defective/normal ratio in a society and win with the one-two defectives/democracy combo punch.

They do this most obviously by simply importing defectives and more gradually with conversion, by turning otherwise normal people into defectives by making women slutty workaholics, men weak cucks. Media has been doing this but its been a slow grind since the 60s and many are resistant because their biomechanics are averse to it.

This is why we have hope, albeit temporary. When normals have an option, they will always be won over by leaders that intuitively understand them. These leaders will have an advantage because they work with people’s sensibilities and people need far less Machiavellian persuasion this way. Messages become simple: Build Wall. No Rapists. Better Deals. Let’s Win. Obvious truths negate decades of carefully insidious progressive demoralization of the masses. Those in control take great care to make sure these leaders never break in to the arena, because once they do they are not the heel, they are the hero. The barriers to entry are high.

Trump is the first to make it. He may not be the last. But he may also be the last chance. When the defective/normal ratio tips too high, coupled with universal suffrage, the state is doomed. If Trump gets cockblocked it will be an interesting century for America or whatever is left of it.

May we live in Trumpening times.


A two-fer for shartiste.

A nascent HBDer that thinks he’s clever might suggest that the univeralist blank-slatism of white liberals is a culture that mirrors their genes. I’d argue that it is not, but rather a tendency toward status-whoring. Those who can’t achieve status through more traditional means lean on liberal politics to signal intelligence and status, buttressed by media and Hollywood liberal signalling. This blank-slate diversitard stuff isn’t in anyone’s genes, if it was then rich liberals wouldn’t live in 95% white enclaves.

HBDers would argue that the genes are the causal agent that germinates the expression of status whoring and whatever is the contemporary outlet for socially signaling one’s moral superiority. So one could say both the HBDer and shartiste’s views are simultaneously operative. I do think shartiste’s point about the numerical growth of shitlib defectives meaning that there will be more empty status signaling by SJWs who couldn’t accrue real status is spot on.


Let’s make it a three-fer for shartiste!

lots of times when a guy “suddenly lost interest” its because he got the notch. women often omit this detail from their “I got ghosted” stories, they don’t want to believe putting out can vacuum the attraction out of a guy that quickly, especially when it had the opposite effect on them, but the novel new nookie brings a clarity that had been clouded to the man in pursuit.

Men fall asleep after sex. Women want to talk, cuddle, and get reassurances that their love is reciprocated after sex. That right there should be enough to clue even the stupidest gender bender feminist that men and women are fundamentally different in their psychologies.

Read Full Post »

COTW winner The Other Anonymous reminds defeatist losers that the men who do well with women all have a singular quality in common (and it isn’t looks):

I’m smarter than you, I’m richer than you, I’m better looking and funnier – but while you’re asking yourself these demotivating questions – I’ve already approached her – and that, more than anything, is why my odds are better.

If you only live by one credo, you can’t go wrong following the BUSTAMOVE philosophy.


Sentient wins COTW second prize for his field report demonstrating the manly allure of supreme overconfidence on women, using nothing but a presumptuous hand gesture.

I love watching Vitaly. Some of his stuff is really hysterical and matches my glibness when I am dialed up to 11… Was at a charity fund raiser recently at a street fair, manning a refreshment booth with a 28 YO 6 and 3 older guys (50+). Things are slow so I put some Vitaly “Hand of God” to use… Like this..


I start pointing to women 10 – 70 feet away and motioning them to come to the table. It was pretty hysterical. First – 95% of them came over and zero percent of them – listen up Kevin [ed: kevin is a representative of the defeatist loser brigade] – gave any unpleasant response at all. The vast majority smiled, laughed and came all the way over.

No matter if they were with a guy or not… The few that didn’t just smiled or waved and shook there head no and kept walking.

I would just point to them, nod and gesture, could be a come hither with the finger, or a full palm over, and then I got creative as well – nodding and pulling hand over hand like on a rope or pulling back and reeling in like on a fishing pole… Giggles, curious sly smiles, “what me’s”… but 95% of them, maybe 50 women of all ages (I targeted the 6’s and up) step foot in front of foot all the way up to the booth… on command. with husbands, boyfriends etc in tow if they had any, with their girls around them… all caught in the power of a simple direct non verbal gesture.

Was really eye opening.

Now when they got up to the booth, I couldn’t run real game on them because I was surrounded by people who know me and wife, but damn, there was great banter, frivolity, teasing and a few of these girls went off completely crestfallen after I dismissed them to tend to the line. and lot’s of sales were made LOL.

Now the 28 YO with me (she had a 7 face but a little hippy) as I expected, responds well to this display. I start also commanding her to do little things for me, count the money, refill inventory, walk around and drum up business – all in a teasing but direct way. She is lapping it up though. In the small space, kino is incidental and becomes more frequent – arm, lower back, waist as we are moving around the booth… Hit her with some laser eye, close proximity and direct questions on what she got up to last night. Good stuff.

The older dudes – well they are a bunch of WK beta guys – but no doubt I am a legend to them “crazy”… they got to leer and mumble quietly “did you see that one!!!!” and occasionally stammer something out – picking up on my teasing but ham handed, cringe worthy stuff.

And I really understood why women don’t like beta K’s – because they are disingenuous liars… all of them WANTED to fuck these women, none of them wanted to acknowledge it and you could see the women… whereas I was fairly sexual – even in an indirect way – and they were responsive to different degrees…



PA wins COTW runner-up prize for the reason he gives approving of the stylistic elements of a White Student Union poster in Toronto.

I like that they’re using images of handsome men rather than beautiful women, as is common in pro-White propaganda. The beauty of the idealized White woman is indeed one of our glories, but we’re now in an environment where women should get discreetly moved out of sight and impressive men start appearing as the faces that represent us.

Very effective. The graphic sings with revolution. Also, you can see that the two men in the poster abide a CH truism about alpha male body language: Looking off into the distance, unsmiling, with heavy thoughts animating one’s gaze, is a very attractive pose to women. Not coincidentally, it is an inspiring pose that speaks to pre-revolutionaries as well.


Reader Jack gets a COTW honorable mention for correctly translating women’s stated preferences into their real world revealed preferences.

When a woman says she likes smart men, that word does not mean the same thing that men mean when they say “smart”.

Just like when a woman says she wants romance, what she really wants are parsimoniously doled out displays of almost-vulnerability from an unattainable alpha. Not a cringeworthy display of needy oneitis from an all-too-attainable beta.

The devil is in the definition.

What the men of the world need is a Womanese-to-English translator. What’s this? CH already invented one? How about that!

Read Full Post »

COTW winner is (and maybe for the first time?) regular ranter extraordinaire Matt King, giving his take on GOP presidential candidate Ben Carson and, by extension, the unmoored culture in which Carson’s rise is enabled.

He is a goddamn nagger. Next.

Please, white man, start speaking clearly.

The minute you start examining him beyond his race, you begin — ever so subtly — aiding and abetting the enemy. Maybe that’s not your preferred world, but that is the shitshow we have been given. I’m sure Uncle Ben is really nice. He might even be as smart as Thomas Sowell.

But we are in a fight to the death. All that matters is strength vs. weakness. That’s why Trump can be a secret socialist manchurian candidate for all I care so long as strength is seen winning. The standards of social intercourse have been turned on their ass. Up is down, man is woman, black is white. Nothing can be accomplished until we unfuck the skew that distorts everything. Nothing.

CH pat himself on the back in the prior post for his contribution to a renaissance of this world view, and he should congratulate himself (just like Trump does). He has promoted a return to manliness — albeit with too much focus on the wrong ends, limiting his appeal — and Trump is its first manifestation in politics.

This is not the time to go wobbly. This is not the time for subtlety. This is not time for fairness or justice or correctness. This is not time for an accurate accounting of “the content of his character” or for hammering out the nuances of policy. This is the time for choosing. Time to declare Yes or No, With or Against, Nagger or Afro-American, Cuckold or Conservative, Cunt or Womyn, Live or Die. Punch first, ask questions later.

I chubbed a little.

COTW runner-up winner is Greg Eliot, providing more context to Matt’s comment above.

Yeah, everyone has their “black friend” and “good negro”…

Most still don’t “get it” that

a) they’re “good” until they’re among their own and then see which way the wind blows.


b) the baggage of the rest of their kind isn’t worth tolerating the 20% or so “good” ones.

Sidenote: a local private school in the past few years has, for some odd reason, appointed a mulatto headmaster. Seems like a decent enough fellow and all that, wife has that ol’ fashioned negro “class” (think of the lady that coached the Supremes).

Yet oddly enough, over the past few years, the number of negro parents who are now able to afford the $25K to send their little pickanninnies to the elementary school portion of the school seems to have swelled significantly, and “Diversity” curricula now gets pride of place on all the signage of the school that was founded several hundred years ago.

And of all the foreign languages offered now, not one is that of the founders… go figger.

Diversity™ erodes the nation-state through invidious psy op mechanisms. You are soothed into a comfort bubble of warm altruistic feels, and then one day you wake up to find yourself robbed blind and left in the street half-naked, with no home to go to for respite from the storm.


COTW consolation prize goes to Beautiful Truths Ignored, commenting on the foreign policy the US should have if it weren’t beholden to domestic hostile forces.

1000 Hungarian police on the Serbian border and 1000 Russian troops in Latakia have done more to protect Western Civilization in the past week than millions of American servicemen have done in the past quarter century.

That shiv hit a vital.

Read Full Post »

COTW winner Artisanal Toad titillates with a suggestive theory for why men prefer virgins and why cock carousel riders are bad bets for long-term commitment.

I suggest that CH spend some time investigating the complexities of the microbiome with respect to the [Alpha Fux/Beta Bux] model.

The act of “becoming one flesh” is usually relegated to the sidelines as a spiritual concept but in reality its a simple biological fact that everyone has a specific microbiome profile. Everyone has about ten trillion cells that make up their bodies, but there are about one hundred trillion cells living in that same body that are microbes. The human genome has about twenty-one thousand genes, but the microbes living in the body have around eight million genes that interact with the body, turn genes on and off, tinker with the immune system and stuff like that. The microbes in the body are part of who the person is.

When a woman spreads her legs for a guy she isn’t just getting his semen, she’s getting a big dose of his microbiome and as time passes they literally become one flesh as their microbiome profiles merge. The microbiome affects who you are, how you think and how you feel. It has a huge impact on things like digestion, allergies, diabetes, obesity, bowel disorders and even psychiatric stuff like schizophrenia and depression. Researchers are just getting started looking at this stuff.

(Not to put to sharp a point on it… but there’s a good scientific reason for not sticking your dick in crazy… because it rubs off and becomes part of you. It works the other way too. The sluts who hook up with the bad boys are getting a dose of their microbiome profile… absorbing crazy one microbe at a time. The dark tryads, the psychopaths, the aspy-alphas, all of them. We don’t even know the questions to ask in terms of to what degree the microbiome profile affects psychopathy, sociopathy and the cluster-B problems, but there’s plenty of evidence to suggest something is there.)

One aspect of alpha fux is when several women are sharing the same guy, there is a shared exchange of the microbiome with each other as well as him and over time they all develop a similar profile. So, if he’s sticking his dick in crazy he’s going to be transmitting crazy to every woman he screws after that. Think about it. Why are more and more women so screwed up? Maybe there’s more here than meets the eye.

The microbiome has an impact on emotions and the way you think about things. It goes even further, though, when we consider single mothers. When a woman gets pregnant, fetal cells will invade her body. These are almost always stem cells and they’ll go to any part of her body that needs help and set to work repairing it. But, fetal cells are half her DNA and half his DNA. That means the father of that baby will literally become a part of her with every baby she has because those cells don’t go away. His DNA will be with her for the rest of her life along with his microbiome.

Do you really want a woman like that? Again, science hasn’t even begun to investigate the extent of what is happening here.

Doctors used to think that semen was just the delivery vehicle for the sperm, but now they know better. Semen is now considered the most complex fluid the body produces, more complex than blood. It’s loaded with enzymes and prostaglandins that female bodies don’t produce. The vagina, cervix and uterus will absorb it. This is one reason why women are biologically attracted to being raw-dogged, because to use condoms is to rob them of things they need. Literally.

The woman about to hit the wall that’s a former carousel rider looking to change lanes has polluted herself in a very microbial way as much as she can and a man that settles for something like that is taking on a case of “damaged goods” in ways that science is only just now beginning to investigate.

This sounds similar to Greg Cochrane’s theory that a lot of unusual human behaviors, like homosexuality, may be caused by pathogens.

So if we accept the “microjizzome” theory at face value, we have to accept that our wise forebears had it right about young virginal women: virgins are a prize worth pursuing. And the value of virgins is nearly universally high across the globe.

I don’t necessarily buy this theory. It carries a whiff of epigenetics, which is a favored, and mostly overblown, opposing theory held by a lot of blank slatists against the gene-dominant view of causes of human behavior. But, it does have some theoretical and observational evidence for it, so it’s worth investigating to see if there’s something there.


COTW runner-up is “just passing through”, who remarks on the Charlotte Proudman story making the alt-mockery rounds.

CH’s wisdom must have finally got through to my thick head. As soon as I read tho story this morning I posted this comment in the Telegraph…


Any man with the slightest knowledge of how attraction works in the female psyche, knows that this woman wasn’t really upset with this Man’s indication of interest in her, but because he weakly, hedged his bets by qualifying that interest with the precursor…”I know this isn’t PC but”. And in so doing, sub-communicated his fear. And a frightened Man, is da facto, weak. And there is nothing that turns women off of a man quicker than weakness. In fact, a frightened Man is to a woman, what a drowning person is to another drowning person… At best useless at worse dangerous.

So here’s a diamond bullet of wisdom, mark it well:


But just as “Male Weakness” is cryptonite to a woman’s attraction triggers, “Male Boldness” is pure cat nip. So be bold men. Be bold.

Oh, and never ever ever apologise. Ever! Women take apologies as just another sign of weakness. By all means apologise to your male friends but never to a woman. It won’t help. If you get cornered, do a Clinton…. ” mistakes have been made” speech. But don’t apologise. Ever!

100% truefact. Women are repulsed by weak men like men are repulsed by fat and ugly women.

Read Full Post »

COTW winner Anonymous succinctly explains why there is a perception that women are treating beta males with more contempt than ever before.

Girls are cruelest to other girls. So as betas get more feminized…

Women are as revolted by effeminate, weak men as men are by morbidly obese women.


COTW second place ribbon goes to Phall, resurrecting a favorite CH comment meme.

black men are attracted to women who resemble the great resource-aggregating herbivores of the sub-saharan desert: the elephant, rhinoceros, cape buffalo, and hippopotamus. black men want their women to resemble these creatures in size, shape, color, and texture (it is important to not forget ‘texture’).

these apex herbivores survive droughts in the african wild, affording them high survival rates. fat black women are also unlikely to starve, and while this may seem a moot point if they live in america, it does not change the genetic preferences of their black male suitors. white women can mimic the size and the shape, but never the color or texture.

creatures smaller than these massive behemoths find survival to be fleeting in the harsh climates of africa. to perpetuate their species, they breed rapidly in large numbers (gazelles, wildebeasts, jackrabbits, hyenas, etc). breeding across a large expanse of territory is a useful strategy for preservation and propagation, genetically-speaking.

black men also inherited this disposition to breed with many women. monogamy is just not a smart choice to ensure that your genes are passed on. in statistics, this is called r-selection (rather than K-selection).

heck, blacks like over-breeding so much that some even try to pass along their genes by mating with simians! (this introduced AIDS to the world)

Don’t forget the texture.

Read Full Post »

COTW winner is LongWhiteCon, on the id-soaked reality facing White women who bear mixed race kids.

I don’t know too many men who dream about having kids (our nature is different, and it’s a vague abstract thought, mixed with necessary battle-wariness). However, ALL women dream of having kids, from the days they’re 18 months and playing with dolls and gurgling ‘aww, look at the baby-so cute!’. As slightly more mature women (slightly) their thoughts lean towards wanting to see some of themselves in the child they bear. As opposed to the father, they KNOW they’re the mother, and are assuming everything will go to plan. At first, they’re enthralled with their little mocha baby, with blonde hair and green eyes, but at 6 months, they’re aghast at how much the dark gene has taken over, laying to waste all the mother’s traits. A comment from a friend at the ‘caffeecleek’ (peer-group very important) along the lines of ‘she has such lovely brown eyes’ can really be a devastating shiv.

Like CH has said (and something which anthropologist Peter Frost has echoed in his writings), the White European aesthetic, behavioral and physical, is the result of a few thousand years of specialized, highly circumstantial selection for exquisitely refined traits that exist nowhere else in the world. Turning one’s back on that genetic heritage is akin to crapping on the Mona Lisa.

PA adds a painful twist,

That shiv is not for the squeamish, but in perverse times an acid bath of truth can save others from making a horrible mistake.

Another such built-in shiv lies in the word “beautiful.” Sarah Palin called her Downs Syndrome baby that. No scorn on her, as a sick child is a tragedy. But the point is, that nobody calls a normal child “beautiful.”

I see distant acquaintances and occasionally their friends-of-friends on FB post their children’s photos. In the rare cases that it’s a mulatto child of a White woman, there will invariably be a “beautiful” or similar words posted in comments. Almost never, in the case of a White child of a White woman (or a Black child of a Black woman, for that matter.

Intra-female dialogue has its own subtle rules. One of those rules is, I surmise, to appear generous and giving, while distancing oneself from any association with befoulment, as understood by her within the rules of her millieu.

This comment reminded me that I had recently heard a SWPL chick use the word “beautiful” to describe the mystery meat issue in a photo of a mixed race family (white father-black mother). The infant was about as far from “beautiful” as possible, she must have known this, and her little signaling game to her fellow SWPL whites wrested a pursed lip and a curt “hm” from me. Women have an amazing tolerance for these kinds of mincing, passive-aggressive status cues.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,394 other followers

%d bloggers like this: