Archive for the ‘Comment Winners’ Category

COTW winner is (and maybe for the first time?) regular ranter extraordinaire Matt King, giving his take on GOP presidential candidate Ben Carson and, by extension, the unmoored culture in which Carson’s rise is enabled.

He is a goddamn nagger. Next.

Please, white man, start speaking clearly.

The minute you start examining him beyond his race, you begin — ever so subtly — aiding and abetting the enemy. Maybe that’s not your preferred world, but that is the shitshow we have been given. I’m sure Uncle Ben is really nice. He might even be as smart as Thomas Sowell.

But we are in a fight to the death. All that matters is strength vs. weakness. That’s why Trump can be a secret socialist manchurian candidate for all I care so long as strength is seen winning. The standards of social intercourse have been turned on their ass. Up is down, man is woman, black is white. Nothing can be accomplished until we unfuck the skew that distorts everything. Nothing.

CH pat himself on the back in the prior post for his contribution to a renaissance of this world view, and he should congratulate himself (just like Trump does). He has promoted a return to manliness — albeit with too much focus on the wrong ends, limiting his appeal — and Trump is its first manifestation in politics.

This is not the time to go wobbly. This is not the time for subtlety. This is not time for fairness or justice or correctness. This is not time for an accurate accounting of “the content of his character” or for hammering out the nuances of policy. This is the time for choosing. Time to declare Yes or No, With or Against, Nagger or Afro-American, Cuckold or Conservative, Cunt or Womyn, Live or Die. Punch first, ask questions later.

I chubbed a little.

COTW runner-up winner is Greg Eliot, providing more context to Matt’s comment above.

Yeah, everyone has their “black friend” and “good negro”…

Most still don’t “get it” that

a) they’re “good” until they’re among their own and then see which way the wind blows.


b) the baggage of the rest of their kind isn’t worth tolerating the 20% or so “good” ones.

Sidenote: a local private school in the past few years has, for some odd reason, appointed a mulatto headmaster. Seems like a decent enough fellow and all that, wife has that ol’ fashioned negro “class” (think of the lady that coached the Supremes).

Yet oddly enough, over the past few years, the number of negro parents who are now able to afford the $25K to send their little pickanninnies to the elementary school portion of the school seems to have swelled significantly, and “Diversity” curricula now gets pride of place on all the signage of the school that was founded several hundred years ago.

And of all the foreign languages offered now, not one is that of the founders… go figger.

Diversity™ erodes the nation-state through invidious psy op mechanisms. You are soothed into a comfort bubble of warm altruistic feels, and then one day you wake up to find yourself robbed blind and left in the street half-naked, with no home to go to for respite from the storm.


COTW consolation prize goes to Beautiful Truths Ignored, commenting on the foreign policy the US should have if it weren’t beholden to domestic hostile forces.

1000 Hungarian police on the Serbian border and 1000 Russian troops in Latakia have done more to protect Western Civilization in the past week than millions of American servicemen have done in the past quarter century.

That shiv hit a vital.

Read Full Post »

COTW winner Artisanal Toad titillates with a suggestive theory for why men prefer virgins and why cock carousel riders are bad bets for long-term commitment.

I suggest that CH spend some time investigating the complexities of the microbiome with respect to the [Alpha Fux/Beta Bux] model.

The act of “becoming one flesh” is usually relegated to the sidelines as a spiritual concept but in reality its a simple biological fact that everyone has a specific microbiome profile. Everyone has about ten trillion cells that make up their bodies, but there are about one hundred trillion cells living in that same body that are microbes. The human genome has about twenty-one thousand genes, but the microbes living in the body have around eight million genes that interact with the body, turn genes on and off, tinker with the immune system and stuff like that. The microbes in the body are part of who the person is.

When a woman spreads her legs for a guy she isn’t just getting his semen, she’s getting a big dose of his microbiome and as time passes they literally become one flesh as their microbiome profiles merge. The microbiome affects who you are, how you think and how you feel. It has a huge impact on things like digestion, allergies, diabetes, obesity, bowel disorders and even psychiatric stuff like schizophrenia and depression. Researchers are just getting started looking at this stuff.

(Not to put to sharp a point on it… but there’s a good scientific reason for not sticking your dick in crazy… because it rubs off and becomes part of you. It works the other way too. The sluts who hook up with the bad boys are getting a dose of their microbiome profile… absorbing crazy one microbe at a time. The dark tryads, the psychopaths, the aspy-alphas, all of them. We don’t even know the questions to ask in terms of to what degree the microbiome profile affects psychopathy, sociopathy and the cluster-B problems, but there’s plenty of evidence to suggest something is there.)

One aspect of alpha fux is when several women are sharing the same guy, there is a shared exchange of the microbiome with each other as well as him and over time they all develop a similar profile. So, if he’s sticking his dick in crazy he’s going to be transmitting crazy to every woman he screws after that. Think about it. Why are more and more women so screwed up? Maybe there’s more here than meets the eye.

The microbiome has an impact on emotions and the way you think about things. It goes even further, though, when we consider single mothers. When a woman gets pregnant, fetal cells will invade her body. These are almost always stem cells and they’ll go to any part of her body that needs help and set to work repairing it. But, fetal cells are half her DNA and half his DNA. That means the father of that baby will literally become a part of her with every baby she has because those cells don’t go away. His DNA will be with her for the rest of her life along with his microbiome.

Do you really want a woman like that? Again, science hasn’t even begun to investigate the extent of what is happening here.

Doctors used to think that semen was just the delivery vehicle for the sperm, but now they know better. Semen is now considered the most complex fluid the body produces, more complex than blood. It’s loaded with enzymes and prostaglandins that female bodies don’t produce. The vagina, cervix and uterus will absorb it. This is one reason why women are biologically attracted to being raw-dogged, because to use condoms is to rob them of things they need. Literally.

The woman about to hit the wall that’s a former carousel rider looking to change lanes has polluted herself in a very microbial way as much as she can and a man that settles for something like that is taking on a case of “damaged goods” in ways that science is only just now beginning to investigate.

This sounds similar to Greg Cochrane’s theory that a lot of unusual human behaviors, like homosexuality, may be caused by pathogens.

So if we accept the “microjizzome” theory at face value, we have to accept that our wise forebears had it right about young virginal women: virgins are a prize worth pursuing. And the value of virgins is nearly universally high across the globe.

I don’t necessarily buy this theory. It carries a whiff of epigenetics, which is a favored, and mostly overblown, opposing theory held by a lot of blank slatists against the gene-dominant view of causes of human behavior. But, it does have some theoretical and observational evidence for it, so it’s worth investigating to see if there’s something there.


COTW runner-up is “just passing through”, who remarks on the Charlotte Proudman story making the alt-mockery rounds.

CH’s wisdom must have finally got through to my thick head. As soon as I read tho story this morning I posted this comment in the Telegraph…


Any man with the slightest knowledge of how attraction works in the female psyche, knows that this woman wasn’t really upset with this Man’s indication of interest in her, but because he weakly, hedged his bets by qualifying that interest with the precursor…”I know this isn’t PC but”. And in so doing, sub-communicated his fear. And a frightened Man, is da facto, weak. And there is nothing that turns women off of a man quicker than weakness. In fact, a frightened Man is to a woman, what a drowning person is to another drowning person… At best useless at worse dangerous.

So here’s a diamond bullet of wisdom, mark it well:


But just as “Male Weakness” is cryptonite to a woman’s attraction triggers, “Male Boldness” is pure cat nip. So be bold men. Be bold.

Oh, and never ever ever apologise. Ever! Women take apologies as just another sign of weakness. By all means apologise to your male friends but never to a woman. It won’t help. If you get cornered, do a Clinton…. ” mistakes have been made” speech. But don’t apologise. Ever!

100% truefact. Women are repulsed by weak men like men are repulsed by fat and ugly women.

Read Full Post »

COTW winner Anonymous succinctly explains why there is a perception that women are treating beta males with more contempt than ever before.

Girls are cruelest to other girls. So as betas get more feminized…

Women are as revolted by effeminate, weak men as men are by morbidly obese women.


COTW second place ribbon goes to Phall, resurrecting a favorite CH comment meme.

black men are attracted to women who resemble the great resource-aggregating herbivores of the sub-saharan desert: the elephant, rhinoceros, cape buffalo, and hippopotamus. black men want their women to resemble these creatures in size, shape, color, and texture (it is important to not forget ‘texture’).

these apex herbivores survive droughts in the african wild, affording them high survival rates. fat black women are also unlikely to starve, and while this may seem a moot point if they live in america, it does not change the genetic preferences of their black male suitors. white women can mimic the size and the shape, but never the color or texture.

creatures smaller than these massive behemoths find survival to be fleeting in the harsh climates of africa. to perpetuate their species, they breed rapidly in large numbers (gazelles, wildebeasts, jackrabbits, hyenas, etc). breeding across a large expanse of territory is a useful strategy for preservation and propagation, genetically-speaking.

black men also inherited this disposition to breed with many women. monogamy is just not a smart choice to ensure that your genes are passed on. in statistics, this is called r-selection (rather than K-selection).

heck, blacks like over-breeding so much that some even try to pass along their genes by mating with simians! (this introduced AIDS to the world)

Don’t forget the texture.

Read Full Post »

COTW winner is LongWhiteCon, on the id-soaked reality facing White women who bear mixed race kids.

I don’t know too many men who dream about having kids (our nature is different, and it’s a vague abstract thought, mixed with necessary battle-wariness). However, ALL women dream of having kids, from the days they’re 18 months and playing with dolls and gurgling ‘aww, look at the baby-so cute!’. As slightly more mature women (slightly) their thoughts lean towards wanting to see some of themselves in the child they bear. As opposed to the father, they KNOW they’re the mother, and are assuming everything will go to plan. At first, they’re enthralled with their little mocha baby, with blonde hair and green eyes, but at 6 months, they’re aghast at how much the dark gene has taken over, laying to waste all the mother’s traits. A comment from a friend at the ‘caffeecleek’ (peer-group very important) along the lines of ‘she has such lovely brown eyes’ can really be a devastating shiv.

Like CH has said (and something which anthropologist Peter Frost has echoed in his writings), the White European aesthetic, behavioral and physical, is the result of a few thousand years of specialized, highly circumstantial selection for exquisitely refined traits that exist nowhere else in the world. Turning one’s back on that genetic heritage is akin to crapping on the Mona Lisa.

PA adds a painful twist,

That shiv is not for the squeamish, but in perverse times an acid bath of truth can save others from making a horrible mistake.

Another such built-in shiv lies in the word “beautiful.” Sarah Palin called her Downs Syndrome baby that. No scorn on her, as a sick child is a tragedy. But the point is, that nobody calls a normal child “beautiful.”

I see distant acquaintances and occasionally their friends-of-friends on FB post their children’s photos. In the rare cases that it’s a mulatto child of a White woman, there will invariably be a “beautiful” or similar words posted in comments. Almost never, in the case of a White child of a White woman (or a Black child of a Black woman, for that matter.

Intra-female dialogue has its own subtle rules. One of those rules is, I surmise, to appear generous and giving, while distancing oneself from any association with befoulment, as understood by her within the rules of her millieu.

This comment reminded me that I had recently heard a SWPL chick use the word “beautiful” to describe the mystery meat issue in a photo of a mixed race family (white father-black mother). The infant was about as far from “beautiful” as possible, she must have known this, and her little signaling game to her fellow SWPL whites wrested a pursed lip and a curt “hm” from me. Women have an amazing tolerance for these kinds of mincing, passive-aggressive status cues.

Read Full Post »

PA, ya gone and done it again.

Love and hate go together. Hate is what you feel to those who’d harm that which you love. Without hate, love is impotent. Without love, hate is cannibalistic.

Passion doesn’t follow guard rails. Passionate men hate and love with equal intensity. Weak men often confuse passion for blind hate or evidence of insecurity, because it is imperative to their sense of worth that they diminish the righteousness of their enemies’ cause.

Read Full Post »

Commenting on a Porter post about the recent town hall meeting where former Democrat Governor and Presidential hopeful Martin O’Malley made an utterly benign observation — “all lives matter” — in response to a genteel gathering of tawny yeoman farmers politely discussing the proper police handling of criminal perpetrators, an observation for which O’Malley later profusely apologized for inflicting upon the crowd of well-wishers, Alex the Goon writes,

I’m trying to imagine what Trump would have done, and can only narrow it down to “Shut up”, or “You are rude and uncivilized; your life doesn’t matter to anyone”, or “[off-mike] Security, get this bitch outta here”. Either way, he would gain 24 points overnight, and cause Mrs. O’Malley to ovulate two weeks early.

I laughed. Because that shiv hit the bone.

We’ve reached the point of societal decline where the country would benefit from having more Donald Trumps rather than fewer.

Reminder: Chateau Heartiste endorsed Donald Trump for President before his recent popularity surge. A bloviating winner beats a sickening, mewling, supplicating manlet loser seven days a week and twice on Sunday.


Read Full Post »

Commenter tspark156 is quick with the pith and earns this week’s COTW:

The inherent self defeating contradiction of female empowerment is that to achieve it means becoming more masculine. Femininity becomes a weakness therefore there is no actual empowerment for what is truly feminine.

As CH has written, there does seem to be a convergence of Western men and women into an androgynous slop. Feminists have deceived themselves into believing femininity is a losing hand, but to their great pain and regret they will find that playing a second-rate man is far less empowering than living as a first-rate woman.


Phil A. O. Physh nails cuckservatism in a simple formulation and takes home the COTW runner-up ribbon.

At this point “Conservative” simply means “Late to the (Progressive) party”.

Can we just call conservatives “pussies”, and be done with it? The Pussy Party. Has a nice ring.


PA is cleaning up these COTW awards. He’s our second COTW runner-up. Maybe time to get a trophy cabinet?

Modern America:

Degeneracy at the top
Depravity at the bottom
Despair in the middle

Despair transforms into resolve when it no longer respects the top.

One can hope. Rule of thumb: If a member of the ruling class or its Hivemind megaphone hates someone, it’s a good bet that hated person is feared precisely because he speaks a message of truth that means the demise of the occupying elite. If you smell your enemy’s fear, you’re on the right track.


Commenter elmer has a business idea for SWPLs who want to impress stoop-shouldered white hipster friends (or black girlfriends) with their connection to the black communitaaaaahh.

When they ask “do you have any black friends” is when you invoke my killer app CloudBlackFriend, who will send you a personalized most def tweet or other “social media” channel message.

Status whoring SWPL: “Hold on a sec.” *checks CBF app* “Dey got they OPP to suck they dik.”

SWPL Peer: “Keep it real!” *raises hand for high five, misses by a foot*


Not a COTW winner, or runner-up, or anything, but funny nonetheless. “Anonymous” chortles,

At this this point a guy could probably run on a platform of (1) closing the fucking borders and (2) mandatory gay marriage for everyone, and still get elected.

Build up this wall, Mr. Obama! (and tear down that other wall, you swishy mulatto!)

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,470 other followers

%d bloggers like this: