Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Comment Winners’ Category

Escoffier, reacting to the following news story about an exhibitionist University of Cambridge professor (via /pol/ News Network)…

Welcome to Ivy League universities: where professors walk around naked, and if you ask them to cover up you’ll be expelled or fired.

Universities are Leftist indoctrination camps, nothing more.

 

…earned a coveted COTW with this response:

When Women are allowed to become feral, everyday is a battle to get naked in public and create plausible sounding justifications for it…

Sadly, it’s rarely the women with naked bodies worth ogling.

Even the most lunatic feminist subconsciously knows female worth is tied up with female physical allure, so when feminists go feral they have a strangely self-contradicting habit of stripping naked to denounce “sexual objectification”.

In the subset of the female population that is neither ugly nor feminist, women spend a lot of mental energy rationalizing their urge to show skin in public. They want men to notice them, but they don’t want men to think they’re allowed to notice them. Try and square that circle! (forget it, jake, it’s vaginatown)

***

Runner-up COTW goes to CMC for this volcuck twist on a popular meme:

Your great-great-great Grand dad was part of an army that essentially said, “we’re sick of this shit,” marched right through the enemy’s homebase beating the crap out of them, burning their cities towns and homes, destroying their INFRASTRUCTURE, freeing their slaves and winning war.

You go to comic con and let race mix older woman marrying professional pretender from Obama islands to cup your wife’s milker and slap your face and memorialize it in photo.

You are ghey.

Celebrity and sportsball athlete adoration was always kinda self-cuckingly ghey. Don’t do it. And express disgust when your buddies or your girl do it.

Read Full Post »

Does the title of this post sound like a fair deal? Guess what, most betas don’t even get that.

Doktor Jeep with the COTW win:

When a woman refuses to give a man her best years then no man is obligated to be there for her worst.

And we’ll be seeing a new breed of women to whom it will be quite stark being told that the meaning of their lives is merely to serve as a warning for others.
This article would be wasted on roastie who can’t understand it. But it should be shared with every daughter, niece, and granddaughter we know of.

Five minutes of alpha beats five years of beta. Male analogue: Ten years of hott beats fifty years of nott.

The Shivster wins the COTW runner-up prize (a set of steak knives…for sharper shivving, ofc),

Interesting…clicking through to her recent [cock carouseler’s] lament in the nypost, we see a picture of her. She looks older than 37. More like 45+.

She reminds me a bit of an old Spanish teacher. The baggy white peasant clothes and lack of makeup insist that she’s “not trying” to be sexy. (When you can no longer compete against the younger tighter gals, you withdraw from competition to spare yourself the pain of losing.)

Her eyes look kinda squinty. Her skin looks tired…like on older women who have had too many microdermabrasions and acid peels. Part of this is the hundred-c*ck stare, and part of it is aging, and part of it is staring into the void of her cat lady future.

But even now, she’s trying to protect her ego. She wants us to know that she “dated” the original Mr. Big. She wants us to know that she WOULDN’T have dated her current beau back in her prime. And, with her outfit, she wants us to think that she’s become less shallow and more spiritual. When in fact she’s just become more insecure about her looks.

But this is all a mistake. If she’s truly seen the light, she needs to realistically assess her current MMV, accept that her current Beta beau is the best she’s gonna do, and start treating him like an Alpha before she loses him too. She needs to doll herself up, stop telling herself or anyone else that she’s settling for reasonable, and start rocking her guy’s world. Not grudgingly, but as enthusiastically as she ever did for Mr. Big. If she wants someone to wife her up at 37, she darn well better be as hot, agreeable, and repentant as possible.

Damaged goods is bad enough, but damaged goods still pining for the good old days is a non-starter. Ugh. You just know she’s telling everyone who’ll listen that her recent “settling” for “Mr. Reasonable” is a spiritual evolution on her part. This is a sure-fire way to lose Mr. Reasonable.

Read Full Post »

As if the only reason white people ever existed was to work seven days a week so n****rs and half a planet’s worth of be*ner dogshit can collect a fucking welfare check.
MPC Status Updates

The notion that Whites owe nonWhites anything is the Big Lie underpinning the central conceit of shitliberalism. When this Big Lie finally evaporates, as it must under the burden of reality, the West will find its footing again and its rebirth will commence.

Read Full Post »

Major1 wins COTW for clearly stating in colorful dialogue the unbending reality of leftoid psychological projection,

This entire post [leftoid envy post] can be condensed into a single, eternal truism.

Whatever a liberal/progressive says, they mean the opposite. Period.

There are only fifty-eight bazillion examples.

“Trump colluded with Russians”
Translation: “Hilary colluded with Russians”.

“The alt-right are fascists”.
Translation: “We are fascists”.

“Trump isn’t mentally healthy enough to be President”.
Translation: “Hilary’s seizure disorder, Parkinson’s disease, alcoholism, and inability to competently handle classified material makes her unfit for the Presidency”.

“Trump is a vulgar pussy-grabber”.
Translation: ” Al Franken, Harvey Weinstein,and Bill Clinton are vulgar pussy grabbers”.

And….ad infinitum.

We can pity our liberal friends, neighbors, and co-workers. That level of prevarication and cognitive dissonance must take a terrible psychological toll.

But just because we pity them doesn’t mean we can’t crush them, mercilessly, under our boots.

Freud really nailed it when he identified “psychological projection” as a real cognitive bias. (He wasn’t right about much else.) The affliction bedevils leftoids far more frequenlty and with greater intensity than it does conservatives. Why? Theory: leftoid will to power is based on phony moralizing, so they need a devious rhetorical trick to convince themselves and their enemies that they act with virtuous intentions. Believing one’s lies helps with that.

Read Full Post »

PBR Streetgang collects this week’s COTW:

Imagine the internet was a real place – it’d be like visiting an enormous public library where everyone was screaming for attention- or jerking off.

I’d drop a mic in PBR’s honor if I had one in my hand. (not a euphemism for anything sordid)

Read Full Post »

From Ryu, a worthy COTW entry,

Women are becoming the men that they need. And men are becoming like the women they want.

How telling, that the women are cashing in, making the big bucks, getting tattoos, a bad attitude….

…while the men are hitting the gym, watching what they eat, being nice and agreeable.

White women will not re-feminize until white men dominate them again. Either white men do it, or the minos and muzz will do it. The void will be filled in any case.

That coda is critical. Women will never lose their desire for dominant men. Their pussy-shaped void will be filled, the only question remaining…by which men? Their own, or the men of an invading tribe?

Read Full Post »

Via TheExcrutiationator, a great comment by Matt in VA regrettably hitched to a Rod Dreher post, making the point that we live in a nation increasingly populated by sociopathic narcissists who aren’t all that different than the murderous school shooters they exploit as a springboard to the start of their left-wing political activism careers with CNN.

I am surprised that you don’t draw out the parallel between school shootings and another common theme on this blog — early-onset transgenderism.

Both are to some degree social contagions and media/extremely-online-culture phenomena.

The most recent school shooting in Florida is depressing but the school shooting itself is not the only thing that is revealing. What is most interesting from a cultural-criticism standpoint is the way the shooting generated a simultaneous parallel media spectacle in the form of the survivors who were already making videos for Youtube while bullets were being fired and who had media handlers and hashtags ready to go before the bodies had a chance to get cold.

I have seen the faces of the *gun control NOW* kids about 1,000 times since the shooting happened less than a week ago. I don’t think I’ve seen any photos of the kids who got murdered at all.

Generation Z will have two big cohorts:

alienated dysfunctional (to a greater or lesser degree) kids who engage in activities ranging from incredibly dedicated online trolling to can’t-get-a-girlfriend PUA forum posting to going crazy and school shooter speedrunning like it’s a videogame

and

smarmy cold-blooded strivers born on third base whose reaction to traumatic and horrifying experiences is to seek–instantaneously, instinctively, even while bodies are hitting the floor around them– to convert them to clicks, engagement, and fodder to pad college resumes with killer ways to sell themselves as passionate self-starters and change agents, hugely effective at doing exactly what Silicon Valley wants most — generating likes, comments, and shares.

100 years ago, many young people (not too much older than these high school kids) responded to the carnage they witnessed and experienced on the Western Front — how? By carrying around a well-worn volume of Housman and writing poetry (*the* characteristic response of that particular generation to the war.)

Now, kids’ primary response to something like this is to trample over the freshly fallen bodies of their classmates in order to throw themselves in front of as many TV and smartphone cameras as possible. The narcissistic sociopathy (cloaked of course, in repeated hysterical assertions of moral self-righteousness based not on acts but on political positions) is related, in a way, to the murderous nihilism of the school shooters themselves. This is how the winners and the losers of today’s society conduct themselves.

The question left to be asked is, WHY is there runaway narcissism in America?

Why do we have a generation of bratlings bouncing like hypertards from one hashtag to the next for a quick fix of social media applause? Why are there limelight hogs like David Hogg who will effortlessly segue from a traumatic school shooting to reciting focus-group tested shitlib lines in front of CNN cameras? Is no one else utterly repulsed by the sight of attention whores slipping in their dying classmates’ blood to grab headlines and harangue Congressmen with political talking points put together by craven chaimstream media propagandists?

Is this cultural trend not SICK AS FUCK to anyone with a scintilla of common decency left in him?

My answer to the narcissism question: it’s the feminization, stupid. Narcissism is an inherently female trait (and homosexual male trait). Both sexes have their narcissists, but the condition is more prevalent and manifests more acutely in women, who are natural attention whores constitutionally aware that their bodies and faces are their primary means of capturing male interest. Furthermore, in a sexual market becoming more r-selected (cads over dads), narcissistic men have a leg up on the male competition.

As our culture and institutions feminize, and media agitprop pathologizes normal healthy masculinity, we get more womanly narcissists. YouGoGrrlism and gay poz are yielding a bounty of narcissists for whom other people are either obstacles or accomplices to the public recognition of their glowing self-conception.

The explosion of Americans with the Dark Triad suite of personality traits means more psycho narcissists mugging for cameras and wearing pussyhats as substitutes for good character. Narcissism is being genetically or socially selected for via open borders mass immigration, sexual choice, cultural propaganda, and social atomization. The latter condition is particularly fertile ground for narcissists to flower, because a complete lack of social controls that otherwise small communities bring to bear on individuals means there is a lot of upside to using narcissistic exploitation to get similar social benefits from strangers that one would normally get in a rooted community from family and neighbors. And given that rootless itinerants are less likely to stick around for long after their sociopathic, narcissistic exploitation has shattered the lives around them, there is less possibility for corrective punishment like social shaming to curb the narcissist’s excesses.

The David Hoggs of the world aren’t far removed from the de Jesus Cruzes of the world. That’s something which should worry us all, because narcissism has a bad habit of burning itself out in a pyre of self-centered immolation that scorches everything in its radius of contact.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: