Archive for the ‘Culture’ Category

I recall reading that Shrillennials are the generation least friendly to the First Amendment, coming out in favor of hate speech codes on campus by a wide margin. I also recall reading that after breaking down the survey data by race, White Millennials are very pro-1A. Maybe Audacious E can confirm or refute.

The real book burners are the Ochre Hordes who currently squat at about 37% of the total US population, and quickly growing in number, especially as a percentage of Millennials. These are the future Americans who will use the Constitution as toilet paper. Our vigrants don’t much care for, or about, airy-fairy notions of free speech. That’s a Heritage America thing, and Heritage Americans are so…yesterday.

Here’s a stunner: 71% of Silicon Valley tech workers are foreign-born.

Big Tech leads the charge to censor political dissidents and demonetize insufficiently submissive Whites who exercise their free speech.

It’s all coming together now. We are beginning to make sense of Clown World.

Free speech, like almost all idealized Western credos, is racial in provenance. Whites are slower to rouse to anger, and generally more tolerant of opposing views. Whites can handle personal insults against either themselves or their kin without resorting to violence in answer.

Free speech is thus best viewed as a natural continuation of a pre-existing White psychological disposition. The Bill of Rights is White temperament codified.

But Paperwork Americans are different, culturally, genetically, psychologically. In most of the world’s people, intolerance is the norm. Impulsive anger is the norm. Contempt for open debate is the norm. Thin skin is the norm. To them, free speech is a casus belli for violent redress. They can see it no other way.

The only way they can live with each other is through a byzantine array of tacit and de jure social taboos governing interpersonal communication. Speech restriction is how they keep a lid on their tempers.

This is why legal enshrinement of abstract principles such as free speech never materialized in the Ochrelands. This is why the Ochre-hai laugh at our quaint ideas of free speech, and why they will tear up, first, the spirit of 1A and, second, the letter of 1A, once they have achieved demographic critical mass.

Which they are already doing. The Ochrefication of America is underway. Our cherished Anglo-Germanic rights won’t survive the onslaught.

You can’t expect alien peoples to honor and respect the same principles that Heritage Americans honor and respect. The principles must be felt in the bones to be obeyed and sustained, and despite universalist agitprop to the contrary, the vast majority of the world feels nothing in their bones for creedal America.

When they rule, the rules will change. You have been warned.

Read Full Post »

*mixed race couples in bed on tv*

shitlib: “er, i’m sure kids have seen worse”

*gay kisses on tv*

shitlib: “er, i’m sure kids have seen worse”

*giant animated talking penises and vaginas*

shitlib: “er, i’m sure kids have seen worse”

“trannies in short shorts singing songs to schoolchildren*

shitlibs: “er, i’m sure kids have seen worse”

…pretty soon there won’t be anything worse.

IMO what Clown World is teaching us is the value of disgust as a moral referee.

Shitlibs cheering on an 11-year-old trannyboy and grown gay men slipping him dollars is what Zero Disgust Felt looks like.

It’s time to bring back disgust. Make America Disgusted Again. #MADA

What are some ways to reinstitute a finely-honed disgust reflex in Americans?

One way is a disease epidemic. The least disgusted will be culled first. The remaining will be those with low disgust tolerance who quarantined themselves.

A theory I (and others) have is that an accumulating genetic mutational load in a population burdened by dysgenic breeding (aka loosening of social and economic restrictions on reproduction) will in time unleash a hellish torrent of infectious diseases old and new that will, in accordance with Darwinian reality, exploit the weakened host population.

We may be entering the age of superbugs. Survival will depend on staying out of the cities and choosing your friends wisely.


From Alex the Goon,

Disgust is our strength.

Read Full Post »

Escoffier writes,

Race is far and away the largest TRUTH of the alt-right to the point where people not Red PIlled on race are damn near useless?  The second is the JQ?  Some argue about the order but I think the majority would agree these are #’s 1 & 2?

The three pillars of modern leftoid equalism:

– the sexes are the same
– the races are the same
– Whites are uniquely evil and privileged

are attacked and undermined by:

– sex realism
– race realism
– JQ

People scoffed when I released the sex realism kraken, but I knew what I was doing.

It wouldn’t be long until the other two krakens joined their brother.

And here they are.

Read Full Post »

Slate is the juiciest shtetl of all media outlets.

Everyone’s catching onto the rhetorical legerdemain of shitlibs, and it’s driving the libs insane in the membrane.

It seems like with each new mass shooting the official explanation gets less plausible. We still have no motive for the Vegas shooter, according to “authorities”. Yeah, total bullshit. There’s always a motive, even if it’s a garden variety schizophrenic break with reality. The Mandalay Bay hotel was owned by a Saudi with connections to al-qaeda. Shortly after that shooting (worst in US history), a Saudi royal family faction rounded up Saudi royals and ousted them from power. Coincidence? No, not at all.

Read Full Post »

An explosive 2014 paper authored by (from the look of the names) three White Gentiles finds that female economic independence or female dependence on the state as substitute beta provider husband decreases the stigma against and moral opposition to female promiscuity.

In environments in which female economic dependence on a male mate is higher, male parental investment is more essential. In such environments, therefore, both sexes should value paternity certainty more and thus object more to promiscuity (because promiscuity undermines paternity certainty). We tested this theory of anti-promiscuity morality in two studies (N = 656 and N = 4,626) using U.S. samples. In both, we examined whether opposition to promiscuity was higher among people who perceived greater female economic dependence in their social network. In Study 2, we also tested whether economic indicators of female economic dependence (e.g., female income, welfare availability) predicted anti-promiscuity morality at the state level. Results from both studies supported the proposed theory. At the individual level, perceived female economic dependence explained significant variance in anti-promiscuity morality, even after controlling for variance explained by age, sex, religiosity, political conservatism, and the anti-promiscuity views of geographical neighbors. At the state level, median female income was strongly negatively related to anti-promiscuity morality and this relationship was fully mediated by perceived female economic dependence. These results were consistent with the view that anti-promiscuity beliefs may function to promote paternity certainty in circumstances where male parental investment is particularly important.



Results of both studies were consistent with the theory that opposition to promiscuity arises in circumstances where paternity certainty is particularly important and suggest that such opposition will more likely emerge in environments in which women are more dependent economically on a male mate. Attempts to replicate these results in other cultures will be necessary in order to determine the robustness of this model under diverse social conditions. Further research will also be necessary to illuminate the psychological mechanisms that underlie the observed association between female economic dependence and opposition to promiscuity (e.g., the cues which shape individual perceptions of the local environment). One plausible mechanism is that people living in environments characterized by higher female dependence are more likely to learn about negative consequences associated with promiscuity (e.g., difficulties faced by parents and offspring in situations of high paternity uncertainty), a process which could generate a cultural opposition to promiscuity that is founded on biological concerns.

Now where have you read independently arrived meditations on this theme before? Oh yeah.


And here.

And here.

And here.

When women are economically self-sufficient (aka “leaning in”), or their needs are met by the State (i.e., welfare queens), the value of a beta provider husband goes down. Consequently, the value of paternity certainty drops. If women don’t need to convince a man to stay, they don’t need to convince a man the kid is his. And unconvinced men are less likely to want to stay, completing the dystopian circle.

Women who don’t need a man for his provisioning and protection are the backbone of the “slut pride” movement. Big State, Big Capitalism, and Big Slut reinforce each other. Moral opposition — itself a derivative of the disgust reflex — to sluttery decreases in gynarcho-tyrannies in which women can fend for themselves and can therefore survive as single mommies should they get pregnant by one of their fly by night lovers. Men adapt to this new reality of economically empowered women by emphasizing seduction and pump and dumps at the expense of monogamy or dependability signaling.

Women and alpha men benefit from this system, while beta males are left in the lurch. Predictably, what you’ll see in a gogrrl sexual market is the culture coming to be dominated by women extolling the slut lifestyle and alpha men happily obliging them, as beta men simmer. Women who can financially support themselves [cf, special ladies] will agitate for more sexual freedom and the relaxation of social norms that regulate female hypergamy. These women are making the subconscious calculation that if paternity assurance is passé because they don’t have to economically rely on a man to survive and vault the jobscareersgoals status ladder, then they’d be better off in a system that celebrated and encouraged cock carousel riding. Women get their cad chads without the worry of penury caused by abandonment.

Charming jerkboys are making the calculation that it’s better to drink the milk than to buy the cow, especially if the cow has a lot of miles on her and doesn’t inspire chivalrous adoration or romantic respect.

The Big State-Big Slut nexus is where we find the opposite of the debt-free virgins without tattoos maiden paradise.

Interestingly, the recent PleaseMeToo societal extrusion can be viewed as a clumsy reaction to the decades’ long primacy of Big State Big Slut. The flavor is still man-hating and exculpatory of female responsibility, but underneath the surface feminism one can see the faint outline of a female backlash against slut glorification and the destruction of paternity certainty and monogamy that it leaves in its wake.

Ultimately, Big State and to a lesser extent Big Capitalism will have to be dismantled and reined in to reverse the social trend toward Big Slut. Localism, decentralization, and if necessary secession and segregation, will be the cures that herald a return to Based Damsels.

Read Full Post »

The males — and I use the term loosely — who would acquiesce to voluntary cuckoldry are the kinds of males no woman would want. And the females who would demand acquiescence to cuckoldry are the kinds of females who couldn’t get the man they wanted.


Second City Bureaucrat is my favorite Twatter account, which means he’ll be banned soon.


Michael Tracey, an honorable leftist, has also been wielding the Twatter shivs,

For those unfamiliar with her character, Jennifer Rubin is possibly the most malevolent Stalinist in legacy punditry. Truly a sick piece of cunty shit. Oh, and she’s the house conservative for Cuck, Inc., but I repeat myself.


It’s time for Spot the Hypocrisy, a game you will always win as long as you have very special opponents.

Mark Kogan supplies the endless chutzpah today.

Read Full Post »

There is an epidemic raging of hot teachers banging their underage students. I consider it a harbinger of societal collapse.

The latest “hot for student” fiasco is a doozy.

Teacher needs to see me (and my friend) after school…

That’s a thousand underage cock stare.

You can practically see the faint streaks of six months’ worth of facials.

The kid has tight text game. Passes Jumbotron test. Abides Poon Commandment V: Adhere to the golden ratio (sends half as many texts as she does).

Why do women do this?

Part of the answer is the repercussion of a society which has stopped constraining female hypergamy.

And part of the answer is the de-masculinization of the beta hubbies of these succubi. These chicks are deprived of alpha male in their lives, and they’ll find it in the pre-verbal zfg arms of middle school boys.

Finally, infantilization has taken over the minds of so many women. They’ve never grown up and don’t want to grow up, so banging a student validates their self-perception.

You will be unsurprised to learn the husband of this dead-eyed boyfucker is at DEFCUCK 1. He knew this was going on (started when the boy was 12), and begged the student’s parents not to report his wife to police.

Footage just released also shows Zamora’s husband remained supportive of his wife despite the accusations.

Too many men “supporting” skank whores who don’t deserve it.

‘Not gonna discuss it with you,’ her husband tells police at one point. ‘Brittany is an adult. She’s the best, the best person I’ve ever known,’ he said.

Keep telling yourself that, bub.

It is not clear if they are still together or not.

If they aren’t, it was her decision.

The boy’s parents previously claimed Zamora’s husband Daniel called them and begged them not to report his wife to police after they saw her sexual texts, saying she had made a mistake.


The parents told police that Zamora’s husband ‘harassed’ the father over the phone, begging him not to go to the authorities and insisting that his wife had ‘made a big mistake, but that she loved the kids,’ according to the documents.

Cringingly beta.

Daniel Zamora also allegedly suggested that he and the boy’s dad ‘meet up’ and ‘settle this,’ but the parent turned down his offer and hung up on him.

So fuckin beta.

Zamora and her husband, who she has known she was 16, married in 2015. They do not have any children.

Proof of betaness. She thought his seed unworthy of her womb.

I’m more sickened by the beta husband’s reaction than I am by his slutty teacher wife. This is how men without options behave when their “lucky strike” cheats on them: “She dindu nuffin! Please don’t leave me to masturbate again for another ten year dry spell!”

That’s her husband on the left. Big wide open mouth. Gloryhole face. Nümale submission gesture. He feels so lucky.

I can predict the end of a relationship by how “lucky” the man feels to be in it. The luckier he feels, the faster it ends.

BETA — pledge to stay with a depraved cheating whore

DIGNIFIED MAN — throw her to the wolves

PS Placing bets on the race of the student.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: