Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Culture’ Category

Feminism is a disease that afflicts everyone, including women, but the twisted ideology’s truly innocent victims are boys. Reader Passer By links to a Carlos Slim Personal Blog article on the “decline of men”. He comments,

Btw, just learned about some interesting studies, posted at the (((NYT)))

Basically they argue that single motherhood weakened mostly the male children, because the sisters in such one parent families perform better in life than the brothers. In normal families, there is no difference or brothers perform better.

In other words, the lack of father harms more the male child than the female child. Therefore if you want to weaken men, push for single motherhood. No wonder jews try to destroy the family in the West, while simultaneously strengthening the family in Israel. There is deliberate push to decrease male influence in western society because jews feel threatened by white males, and by their innate nationalism.

So the next time a woman tells you that there aren’t enough good men, you can answer her: there aren’t enough good men because they were raised by women.

That’s a great truth Passer By wrote. There aren’t enough good men because they were raised by women. Trigger the shit out of any feminist or mangina lackey you come across on twatmedia with that stone cold shiv, and link to the relevant study.

From the CSPB article,

In a 2016 paper, David Autor, an economist at M.I.T., and four co-authors, measured academic and economic outcomes of brothers and sisters in Florida born in the decade between 1992 and 2002.

For boys and girls raised in two-parent households, there were only modest differences between the sexes in terms of success at school, and boys tended to earn more than their sisters in early adulthood.

Among children raised in single-parent households, however, boys performed significantly less well than their sisters in school, and their employment rate as young adults was lower. “Relative to their sisters,” Autor and his collaborators wrote, “boys born to disadvantaged families” — with disadvantage measured here by mother’s marital status and education — “have higher rates of disciplinary problems, lower achievement scores, and fewer high-school completions.”

When the children in the study reached early adulthood, the same pattern emerged in employment:

Employment rates of young women are nearly invariant to family marital status, while the employment rates of young adult men from non-married families are eight to ten percentage points below those from married families at all income levels.

Autor and his co-authors conclude that family structure “is more consequential for the skills development and labor market outcomes of boys than girls.”

This study is more interesting than the run-of-the-mill research recapitulating the detrimental effects of single mommery (a major cause celebre of mainstream feminism), because its structure seems to obviate any potential genetic influence into sex-differentiated life outcomes. That is, if genetics were the cause, then the sisters of brothers in single mom broken families would have similarly poor outcomes and behavioral problems. But instead what the researchers found was that single mommery disproportionately affected the life outcomes of boys, leaving their sisters largely untouched (at least as measured by SES outcome and delinquency rate) by the single mommery postindustrial complex.

This isn’t to say genetics aren’t a factor in the shitshow that is single mommery, but it does suggest environmental pressures inherent to single mommery are at least partly to blame for making life harder on boys.

It’s just more evidence that feminism has been, and continues to be, a Hate Machine dedicated to churning out Big Lies about the sexes and about their roles in society, with the express purpose of handicapping boys and men and lavishing extreme favoritism and government largesse on girls and women.

It’s silly to argue feminism is a symptom, rather than a cause, of a broken society when its agenda has directly contributed to so much social disruption, antagonism, distrust, resentment, and national decline. This is like arguing Marxism, Freudianism, Communism, SCALE, and GloboHomoism are symptoms of some deeper, underlying, corrupting force that bedevils the West. Large, society-spanning movements are as much cause as symptom of social degeneration. We’re splitting vellus hairs here.

If one wants to argue for a First Cause of the West’s decline, the most promising culprit would be Hajnalianism, but for some reason those who find SCALE objectionable rarely tackle the subject of inherited empathobesity.

Feminism as a distinctive movement really got started as a vanity project of masculinized or otherwise oddball women who were for various reasons uncomfortable in the world of women. Its leaders — and one shouldn’t neglect to mention the preponderance of feminist leaders were and are Jewish women and their co-tribal male suckups — were able to leverage their gripes to a wider audience of women who had become frustrated and flustered and, in plenty of cases, enthused, by the postindustrial revolution shocks to the social system that, critically, severed fecundity from sex and community from individual.

There was never a feminist movement that had its origins in widespread complaints about male discrimination against working women. That is a myth. Pre-20th Century Western women worked plenty, either on the home or off it. Wives working as apprentices to their husbands’ businesses was fairly common in Medieval Europe.

What feminism has been, and what it remains today, is a propaganda howitzer to mow down the natural order and replace it with an inverted dystopia in which the defining feature is the removal of all constraints on female sexuality and the maximization of restrictions on male sexuality. As in any social movement, the breath of its life emerges first from the sticky goo of the sexual market.

Lies have consequences, and the Big Lies of Feminism and Antiracism have destroyer-of-worlds consequences. They must be fought with a vengeance.

Read Full Post »

I was having a foreplay-slicking conversation with a talented shivlady about the Scandinavians. (She called them the Ikeans.) She wondered how the Scandis went from savage warrior Vikings and continent conquerors to the weeping pussies they are today. I told her it is one of the world’s greatest mysteries, then explained to her the Cycle of Strife.

Basically, I said, the warrior blood gets washed out after many generations of losing the strongest men to attrition on their rape and pillage high adventures. This leaves the gene pool full of the tepid seed of weaker men, the ones who stayed behind to help raise the children of the warriors when they went off to claim new lands. A new, more compliant, people is born on the home front. Civilization needs these domesticated men. All our modern conveniences — a CH reader says that nearly every invention of the 20th Century occurred in a 300 mile radius around Chicago, which is the settlement of the German and Ikean diaspora — are the result of tamed men cooperating toward the goal of easing the burdens of life, especially those burdens that fall most heavily on the women.

But domesticated men have a fatal flaw: they build civilization only to surrender control of it when comfort and prosperity, and haranguing by their social justice ladyfolk, lull them into a defenseless stupor. Weak, domesticated men like the modern Scandinavians are doomed to roll over to foreign invaders and their single White women sponsors. Then their blood is washed out, and into the vacuum the warriors rise again, reclaiming their homeland, crushing the invaders, and putting their silly women to heel. The Cycle of Strife. It is required.

It’s the cycle of strife
and it kills us all
through phony virtue
through hugs and tropes
till we find our place
overrun with ISIS
in the cycle
the cycle of strife

Read Full Post »

J.Ross asks about the Hajnal Line and social phenomena that may account for White ethnic differences in eagerness to cuck on a national scale.

Could you say by way of illustration of the Hajnal Line that Polacks and Magyars have met both Muslims and unrestrained leftism, and are therefore “redpilled” from experience, whereas Londoners and Parisians have only encountered Muslims who either behaved themselves or kept to their enclaves, and leftists balanced by other political elements, and are therefore falsely confident?

J.Ross is touching upon what I call Secular Muslim Syndrome. That is, lib whites living in expensive culture (and often racial) bubbles only come in contact with the 0.1% of muslims who are competent and compatible with White civilization. This distorts the White libs’ worldview and feeds their insatiable appetite for open borders virtue signaling, but that reality distortion field will crack once the numbers of vibrants exceeds the carrying capacity of White libs’ self-delusions.

Secular Muslim Syndrome is real, and can be applied to any nonWhite group that creates friction once transplanted to a White society (see: the Talented Tenf), but it isn’t the whole story, not by a long shot. It’s more of a downstream effect than a first cause, which if the theory of Hajnalianism is true would pinpoint the first cause as an evolved disposition toward outgroup empathy and loyalty leapfrogging. In that case, Secular Muslim Syndrome would be more precisely an example of White libs seeing what they want to see because it fulfills their cuckological needs. This is why you can find craven White shitlib hipsters cowering in diverse shithoods who still cling to their silly numinous negroism.

In short, no, I don’t think Poles’ exposure to more foreign enrichment fully explains their innate red pillness (though it certainly could have been a contributing factor). Instead, Poles are simply more clannish than, say, Germans, and this genetic inheritance has in effect shielded them from adopting the suicidal excesses of Anglosphere Whites.

Like I’ve written before, there is an optimal balance between particularism (clannishness) and universalism (outbred altruism). In my 100% TRUEFACT opinion, the Whites perfectly situated to be the salvation of White nations in our currently operative globohomo environment are those Whites who are Hajnal half-breeds; genetically, partly or even mostly Inner Hajnal with just enough Outer Hajnal blood to ground their cooperative, trusting nature in stone cold common sense. Can you think of any Whites like this in your own life? See if your experience with them matches my assertion.

Read Full Post »

MOST REGRETTABLY, I may have accidentally deleted an email sent by a CH reader about a month ago. I regret it because the reader had included a photo he/she took of one of those anti-Trump spray-stencil street artworks that are lately all the rage in shitlibopolises, except in this particular photo some devilish rascal had come along, presumably in the dark of night to avoid being set upon by a mob of limp-wrists slapping him ineffectually, and spray-painted in black our very own reader PA’s international symbol for the Alt-Right squarely over the cucked lib graffiti.

I meant to put this awesome photo in a post, but now I can’t locate it. (not in spam either) If the original emailer is reading, could you resend plz? And as a lesson for other maul-righters, you too should STEP THE FUCK UP and do the same. Spray your dissident seed all over shitlib towns and cities. Let them know they no longer own the public space, that Wokensteins lurk in their shadows. Making libs uncomfortable in their lily-White gentrified bubbles is the least a true patriot should do.

Read Full Post »

The Bigly Epigone has done a yeolord’s job compiling demographic data on voting patterns in the 2016 national election. Barring a couple of surprises, the data confirm what we in the wokentariat already know about our tooth-and-claw Diversitopia and its consequences for the continued survival of the nation.

One of the highest IQ groups — single Jewish women — voted in nearly the same overwhelming number for Hillary “thecunt” Clinton as did one of the lowest IQ groups — black single mothers, (88% and 97%, respectively). Only “black women” and “black single mothers” had a lower Trump-vote share than did single Jewesses.

This voting data provides evidence for my observation that no group has a greater disconnect between their practiced lifestyles and signaled virtues than do Jewish women. Jews are perhaps the most hypocritical group in America today. Call it anti-semitism if it makes you feel assuaged, but it’s what the real world is telling us.

Also, for any cucked con who thinks there’s a groundswell of “natural conservatives” among nonblack nonWhites and sexual deviants just waiting to storm national elections if the GOPe supplicates hard enough, here are the depressing facts:

TRUMP VOTE SHARE

homos: 20.7%
muslims: 28.4%
hispanics: 32.2%
hindus: 34%
asian women: 33.7%
asian men: 40.7%

Demography is destiny.

The biggest Trump supporters?

White Protestants (68%)
Married White Protestants (70.6%)
Mormons (71.6%, the beeg weiner)

Trumperica is basically Heritage America plus the Wonder Bread of Whites, Mormons.

Which brings us to Surprise #1: Trump’s vote share among single Jewish men was 35.9%, more than three times the number of single Jewish women Trump voters. And among married Jews, an astounding 58.8% majority of married Jewish men voted for Trump! (The corresponding Trump share number for married Jewish women was 42.9%.)

So before we finger all the blame for our nation’s decline on Jews, it’s a good idea to remind oneself that 6 in 10 married Jewish men have boarded the same Trump Train as the goyim. Now we know why all those Jewish men who have enough on the ball to be marriageable like to marry shiksas….they can’t stand their own women’s feminist kvetching.

Which brings us to (Sorta) Surprise #2. Audacious E and Steve Sailer stress that the real dividing line is, and continues to be, marrieds versus unmarrieds rather than women versus men. I wonder though if AE & SS haven’t missed what I consider the most telling demographic Trump vote share revelation. As anonymous over at Sailer’s comments,

Which of these things is not like the others?

Single white women: 39.0
Married white women: 61.4
Single white men: 59.0
Married white men: 61.0

That’s peculiar (not). There’s one glaring outlier to the pro-Trump voting trend among Whites, and it isn’t the generic “unmarried Whites”. It’s “single White women”. Single White men voted for Trump in almost the same numbers as did married White men. Our traitorous, thecunt-loving, Trump-hating Whites are predominately SINGLE WHITE WOMEN. We are betrayed by the sobbingly empty wombs and cock-carved twat tubes of the libarts and salty tarts crowd. Honestly, we all should have seen this betrayal cumming. Single White women have politically (and even socially and sexually) morphed into nonWhites, seeing the government as a substitute beta male provider who doesn’t demand much in return (sex) and lets them slut it up with sexy cads.

So it’s more accurate to say the real dividing line in American politics, at least among Whites, is single White women versus all other Whites.

And from personal anecdote, I can tell you this is true. I have heard more than one single White woman gripe about how her mom or dad or both voted for Trump and she just couldn’t understand what they were thinking.

I can tell her what her parents were thinking about: the future. Single White women have apparently forgotten what the future of their homeland should resemble, or that a future even exists.

***

Update: jackmcg makes a good point about that anomalously high married Jewish men vote share for Trump.

Jewish men didn’t vote majority Trump. Lol. Please.

Most Jewish men will claim they are ATHEIST or NON-RELIGIOUS in these polls.

Sure, religiously identifying Jewish men voted slightly majority Trump. 58% is still paltry though.

This happens all the time, yo. An exit poll that shows Jews voted pro-White ALWAYS leads back atheist Jews claiming they’re not Jews.

Yes, the “married Jewish men” demographic is misleading because it’s probably capturing those Jewish men who still identify as Jewish, rather than as unaffiliated, atheist, or non-religious. This means that data point is likely a snapshot of Orthodox Jewish support for Trump, which was already well-known. The problem is that, though they have a higher birth rate than secular Jews, Orthodox Jews are a minority of Jews in America, and an even smaller influence culturally. Overall Jewish secular support, both married and unmarried, is heavily tilted toward thecunt and her Democreep Party. Secular Jews really do vote like Puerto Ricans and live like WASPs.

The quadumvirate of nation-destroying demographics is therefore: Jews, single White women, homos, and nonWhites. As it ever was (except in Israel).

And don’t expect this trend to reverse or even slow down. As long as the White marriage rate continues falling and the age of first marriage continues rising, the numbers of single White bitterbitches in the population will explode, and with their growing numerical electoral power the decline and death of America is sure to follow.

Make America Great Again (MAGA) should be closely paired with Who Bitch This Is (WBTI), if we seek the salvation of our country.

Read Full Post »

At the end of the last post, I wrote about the modern sexual market and how it may relate to dysgenic breeding.

In my opinion, the current situation is unsustainable. Something’s gotta give. In a near-future post, I will explain how our postmodern sexual market dovetails with evidence that the West is careening toward idiocracy.

Well, the evidence is arriving by hatemail, and it doesn’t look good for the Pollyannas.

From the linked research paper:

Social Epistasis Amplifies the Fitness Costs of Deleterious Mutations, Engendering Rapid Fitness Decline Among Modernized Populations

Deleterious mutations are typically understood exclusively in terms of their harmful effects on carrier organisms. But there are convincing reasons to think that such adverse effects are not confined to the individual level. We argue that in social species, interorganismal gene-gene interactions, which in previous literatures have been termed social epistasis, allow genomes carrying deleterious mutations to reduce via group-level pleiotropy the fitness of others, including noncarriers. This fitness reduction occurs by way of degradation of group-level processes that optimize the reproductive ecology of a population for intergroup competition through, among other mechanisms, suppression of free-riding. Such damage to group regulatory processes suggests a hidden role for the accumulation of behavior-altering “spiteful” mutations in the dynamics of the demographic transition—these mutations may have contributed to the maladaptive outcomes of this process, such as widespread subreplacement fertility. A structured population model is presented describing aspects of this social epistasis amplification model. This phenomenon is also considered as a potential explanation for the results of Calhoun’s mouse utopia experiments, which provide an opportunity to directly test a major prediction stemming from the model.

In plainspeak, the dangerously scaled-up and decadent postmodern West has lost the ability (and the willpower) to cleanse itself of toxic people who have bad DNA mojo and even worse character, and the resulting sludge will build up to the level where the West will collapse under the weight of its welfare state-supported genetic sewage (insert visual of those Ethiopians buried alive by a garbage heap avalanche (true story)).

The paper (according to second-hand sources….I wasn’t able to access the full text) has data that the IQ of Western nations is falling some 0.8 points per generation, and the blame for it is apportioned mostly to dysgenic patterns of fertility, which it explains as consequences of modern post-industrial societies easing up the cultural selection pressures on their populations. The study authors finger the source of the problem as postmodern marriage and childbirth trends; more dumb people (specifically, women) than smart people are having kids, and more people (specifically, women) are waiting until later in life to have kids and therefore passing on more genetic mutations that have accumulated with age in the parents.

The cock carousel is birthing the moron merry-go-round. Sex and the City is being remade as IVF and the Refugees.

Modern, indulgent society — which in reality is the modern sexual market, since society is an emergent property of reproductive dynamics — creates massive, positively reinforcing feedback loops that essentially reward degeneracy and corruption by allowing it to run wild and unopposed, instead of snuffing it out in the crib. Free-riders at first slowly increase in number in a prosperous, proto-declining society, and if their growth isn’t halted early a rapid, exponential decline metastasizes until free-riding becomes the norm. When that happens, social collapse is guaranteed and maybe even necessary for the rebirth that can only occur after the free-riders are washed out of the system (usually in not-so-nice ways….think fire hoses and flamethrowers or, if we’re lucky, the humane option of welfare contingent on mandatory birth control).

There’s a lot going on in this paper, which draws Calhoun’s rat experiments and group selection (a controversial subject) into its theory of dysgenic breeding enabled by a soft, feminized, virtue signaling West. Urban density and anonymity are increasing within the population a lot of weird sexual paraphilias and psychological problems, and as discussed in the previous CH post the severing of the sexual market from the marriage market is delaying family formation and childbirth and contributing to the dysgenic reproductive skew. That, coupled with the pathological altruism that has run amok among White Westerners who basically want the West to be an enormous safety net and catch basin for the world’s 7 billion poors, is pushing White societies close to complete collapse — a cosmic own-goal so amazingly self-destructive that Darwinian selection is practically guaranteed to work swiftly and mercilessly at the task of culling the White West of its low fitness leftoid freaks.

In the end, as always, Diversity + Proximity = War, and as the study authors note, if a group isn’t bothering to defend itself, other groups will be more than willing to fill the power vacuum.

I’m warning shitlibs, get on board the Trump Train. Because if he fails to stop the Sewer World inflow and Globohomo one market dystopia, you libs are NOT gonna like what has to follow.

“You have to be cruel to be kind, in the right measure.” The West needs to relearn the value of this timeless lesson.

***

Readers wonder about suggestions to stem the idiocratic tide. I have offered many within these hallowed Chateau halls. For instance, there’s the CH BOSSS system; let’s break the back of the FemKunt KKKollective and get our HSMV men paired off with young, feminine secretaries less interested in careers than in mothering so the good genes can spread around more evenly to the whole of the White tribe. Close the borders. Kick out the illegals and anchor babies. End wage-gutting cheat codes like the H-1B visa program. Destroy the anti-White propaganda mills (many tools for this, including anti-trust and defunding leftoid institutions). As a last resort, allow the blue states committed to their suicidal ideation to secede from the union.

We in the West are on the precipice of annihilation and a complete repudiation of our past greatness. The good news: there’s still time to fix this. The bad news: there’s not much time left, and there’s a lot to fix.

Read Full Post »

Academia has become a training camp for petty tyrants. Universities were supposed to be arenas where the exchange of ideas, some of them taboo, could be pursued without compromise or threat of suppression. We’ve come a long way……down, baby. The majority of college faculty now either eagerly and gleefully relish the thought of silencing dissenting thinkers, or weakly acquiesce to those holding the heretic-whip. And yet these same dictatorial academics have the gall to project their witch-burning psychoses on Trump and his supporters and brand them the real authoritarians.

PS Interestingly (from an HBD-vantage), a survey of schoolchildren in 1971 found eerily similar percentages of support among them for free speech.

The origins of children’s attitudes toward freedom of dissent were investigated using questionnaire data from 1384 children in grades 5 through 9. Political socialization of attitudes toward free speech apparently does occur during late childhood and early adolescence. Most children acquire support for the abstract principle of free speech in slogan form, without learning its concrete implications. Support for free speech in concrete instances is dictated largely by the child’s attitude toward the dissenting out-group in question and only rarely by the general principle of free expression. There are indications that the child’s confidence in his ability to think divergently contributes to tolerance, presumably by reducing the personal threat posed by deviant out-groups.

More proof that shitlibs (who have almost completely overrun academia) are arrested adolescents, (and that Boomers are were the worst fucking generation ever, in any universe).

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: