Archive for the ‘Feminist Idiocy’ Category

This has been a banner week for feminism, if you like the idea of feminists committing mass hara-kiri. (I do.)

When “Gender Studies” professors and Jezebel shrews are hardest hit, America wins.

Hot off the presses, a new study finds that sex-based brain differences are evident IN UTERO (long before culture or social constructivist poopytalk can plausibly have any influence on the sexes).

Sex-related differences in brain and behavior are apparent across the life course, but the exact set of processes that guide their emergence in utero remains a topic of vigorous scientific inquiry. Here, we evaluate sex and gestational age (GA)-related change in functional connectivity (FC) within and between brain wide networks. Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging we examined FC in 118 human fetuses between 25.9 and 39.6 weeks GA (70 male; 48 female). Infomap was applied to the functional connectome to identify discrete prenatal brain networks in utero. A consensus procedure produced an optimal model comprised of 16 distinct fetal neural networks distributed throughout the cortex and subcortical regions. We used enrichment analyses to assess network-level clustering of strong FC-GA correlations separately in each sex group, and to identify network pairs exhibiting distinct patterns of GA-related change in FC between males and females. We discovered both within and between network FC-GA associations that varied with sex. Specifically, associations between GA and posterior cingulate-temporal pole and fronto-cerebellar FC were observed in females only, whereas the association between GA and increased intracerebellar FC was stronger in males. These observations confirm that sexual dimorphism in functional brain systems emerges during human gestation.

As the study’s conclusion notes, neonatal sex-based brain differences exert lifelong effects on behavioral sex differences:

The study of brain development in utero is imperative for understanding typical and atypical brain development trajectories and achieving optimal long-term neurobehavioral outcomes. The present study demonstrates for the first time that development of fetal brain FC varies with sex. The differential development of FC over gestation in male and female fetuses likely acts as a precursor to sex-related brain connectivity differences observed across the lifespan. Further, the fetal brain networks observed in the present study likely serve as the building blocks for nascent neonatal, toddler, and adult networks.

Colin Wright points out…

Also keep in mind that this study measured *functional* connectivity, not merely differences in brain anatomy.

Feminists and soyboy enablers are being force fed the truth about male and female differences: “society” has nothing to do with them. The source of sex differences is in the brain and begins in utero.

Biology ĂŒber alles.

Feminist Indoctrination Kommissars BTFO.


PS Amazog just banned Kevin MacDonald’s seminal book The Culture of Critique.

Luckily, you can still buy the book here…for now.

That famed liberal tolerance is quite a thing to behold, eh?

There should be a Banned Books Reading Club. That would make a great summer reading list.


PPS One of the few memes I laugh at with every return visit:

Read Full Post »

Feminists have been taking it on the man-chin ever since Le Chateau busted on the scene, so it’s no wonder they react like scared little rabbits scattering before the predator sexbots. For all their bravado, feminists intuit the existential threat that sexbots pose to their (already low) sexual market value. And Swedish feminists are the most femcunty of femcunts who have a lot to lose should their small pool of self-abasing beta male lickspittles dry up as sexbots offer a superior alternative.

Swedish feminists demand State ban on ‘dangerous’ sex robots

Sex robots and sex dolls reinforce the view that women are objects and normalise men’s violence against women, three feminist Swedish organisations claim. They’re demanding legislation targeting technology that “reproduces ideas about exploiting women’s bodies”.

Translating from the feminist poopytalk: “Sexbots appeal to men in ways we can’t, and that hurts our feelings.”

First, sexbots don’t “reinforce” anything because male desire needs no reinforcing. It is a force of nature unto itself.

Second, I hate to inform dumb feminists of this stone cold truth, but women *are* objects. Men are visually stimulated by a host of sexy female physical characteristics, which can be objectively measured against an ideal. In fact, women’s personalities are also objectively measurable. It’s also a false premise to claim that objectification is the purview of one sex. Men are objectified, but under different criteria that aren’t as tidily conspicuous as female youthnbeauty.

Third, sexual relief doesn’t “normalize violence” against women, unless feminists want to argue that every time a man has an orgasm his mind drifts to thoughts of gendercide. If anything, studies have shown there is a decline in rape-y violence where men have alternate sexual outlets.

Finally, they misspelled “reproduces female biological forms which trigger male arousal”.

The debaters noted that today’s sex robots often have the “appearances and attributes typical of the objectifying, sexualised and degrading attitude to women found in today’s mainstream pornography”.

Note the typical femcunt bait and switch: a man’s desire, typified by his boner, is the same as a “degrading attitude to women”. More accurate: a man’s desire is a degrading attitude to fat, ugly feminist shrews who are neglect raped by never being the object of that desire.

“Why are men willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a robot that obeys their smallest command?” the feminists asked rhetorically. “A female robot cannot say no to something that the man wants, if she is not programmed to do so”, the feminists complained.

That’s a feature, not a bug. This statement is very revealing. It’s as if feminists want a romantic landscape in which they can giddily and endlessly reject and deny men’s wants. This state of affairs is a power trip for the bitterbitch feminist.

The leaders of the women’s organisations claimed that fantasies stimulated by such technology may lead to real violence against girls and women.

Only in Latin America.

They also drew parallels with pornography, whose consumption, they claimed, leads to sexist attitudes and actual violence. The dehumanisation of women justifies slavery, and the exploitation of the female body through new technology is part of this, they claimed.

So many claims, so little evidence.

The ardent feminist considers a woman “humanized” when she’s loved for “her mind” and chained in slavery to a corporate cubicle farm and exploited by an academia-to-career pipeline that deprives her of the chance to have more than one non-autistic child who is itself farmed out to daycare run by third worlders who drop her kid on its head and laugh about it.

The three organisations demanded that an inquiry be made to produce proposals on “how technology and activities that normalise abuse can be restricted and prohibited”.

Funny, I was under the impression that Western societies have so abnormalized “abuse” to the point that a shy betaboy can’t look sidelongs at a girl in an elevator without getting fired and cast off from polite company.

Note that the only way these empty, vapid assertions by femcunts are anywhere close to reality is if one redefines “abuse” to mean anything a man does to a woman other than promptly and deeply bow before her arrival and transfer the contents of his bank account to her favored refugee resettlement NGO.

The feminists also want Swedish authorities to make it difficult for “brothels with sex robots and dolls” to open in Sweden.

FYI Swedish feminist “leaders” are actually pissed that Hungary has pro-natal policies which would increase the number of births of White Hungarians. To the Swedish cunt, this is unacceptable. All White women must be made available for race mixing. Link:

Sweden’s ambassador to Hungary has received protests from the Hungarian government following Social Security Minister Annika StrandhĂ€ll’s incendiary tweet against Budapest’s policy to completely exempt mothers of four from taxes.

StrandhĂ€ll wrote that Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s demand for “more genuine Hungarian children” was offensive, “reeked of the 1930s” and effectively offset the benefits of feminism.

“What is happening in Hungary is alarming. Now Orban wants more ‘genuine’ Hungarian children to be born. The policy reeks of the 30s. A right-wing populist you need smokescreens for what this type of policy does to the independence women have been struggling for”, StrandhĂ€ll tweeted.

Swedish feminists are offended by White Hungarian children. I wish I was making this up. To the Swedish (and American) feminist, “independence” for women means encouraging them to get knocked up by Q’antavious Sh’aazaam.

Based Hungary responded to the Swedish shrews,

Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto called StrandhĂ€ll’s statement “unacceptable” and noted a big difference between Sweden and Hungary in terms of politics.

“Hungary spends money on families, while Sweden spends it on migrants”, Szijjarto said…

Where is the lie?

Viktor Orban’s call for “Hungarian children” didn’t resonate well with the Swedish press, either. Sydsvenskan‘s columnist Sofia Nerbrand wrote that Orban “should be ashamed” of steps to stimulate childbirth in Hungary.

“Viktor Orban’s stated goal is that the Hungarian people will increase with the help of white Hungarian offsprings, not migrants,” Nerbrand wrote, calling this approach ‘unsavoury’. “Rhetoric and politics that put one’s own people first and shut out the others should have no place in today’s Europe.”

Swedes are mentally ill. Swedish feminists belong in a funny farm. These awful cunts are on record demanding more migrant births at the expense of native White births. Yet, they now run Sweden:

In 2014, Sweden received its first “feminist” government, which puts a special emphasis on women’s rights.

Sweden will be the first Western nation to collapse in a conflagration of orc invasion and pussyhat misrule, unless Swedish men wake the fuck up and kick these termagants out of a power which does not suit the female temperament and which is consequently ABUSED by feminists who have no earthly idea how to sustain civilization.

The Chateau comes out against any attempts to ban sexbots, unless there is simultaneous banning of fat chicks and caustic feminists, otherwise you’re just gonna create a massive black market fueling illegal profits that would make El Chapo blush.



I wonder what it is that made these sycophants want to see their people, their history, and their homeland be destroyed. There’s feelz over reals, but these are modern day Tarpeia’s.

How is what Swedish feminists bitch about indistinguishable from mental illness? It’s sheer lunacy.

I have a suggestion for Swedish feminists. If you fear the threat from sexbots taking your place in the game of romance, stop being feminists. Lose weight, stick with your kind, respect your role in the home, and drop the battlecunt attitude. You might find Swedish men sharing their way with you.

Read Full Post »

From This is a sobriquet,

Democrats [women] cheered harder for themselves getting into congress than for war heroes, criminal justice reform, child cancer survivors, preventing sex trafficking, lowest unemployment among black/hispanics in history, job growth, and a guy who landed on the moon.

It’s the Congressional LOOKATME caucus. The price of admission is to have a vagina and a perpetually curled snarl.

From Rabbi High Comma,

Occasio-Cortez couldn’t even look sincere clapping for a child with brain cancer. She will do our work for us. She could have gone into porn, or provided vagina for a black running back, but instead her destiny is to red pill millions of Whites who weren’t paying attention. God bless you La Raza Chan.

I know these chicks. The only face barmaidens like Attentionwhore Of-Color can sincerely express is snark&sass, the female counterpoint to the male agree&amplify.

PS Since we’re on the subject of false pride….

Read Full Post »

The Tampon Mob is coming after men. Kavanaugh was the first fusillade in the war against White men.

When campus activists argue against the Trump administration’s due-process guidelines, they are arguing for the power of campus administrators to punish (mainly) young men for alleged acts on or off campus without cross-examination, without seeing available evidence, without a live hearing, and under definitions of the alleged offenses far broader than those that apply under relevant law.

Some people call this neo-Victorianism. I call it Gynarcho-Tyranny. The difference? Gynarcho-Tyranny absolves women of any accountability while punishing men for invisible infractions that offend the accusatory whims of women.

Victorianism placed a lot of social restrictions on women AND men. Gynarcho-Tyranny places those restrictions on men but allows women the freedom to explore their feral sexuality without shame or censure. This is lop-sided treatment that is bound to further corrode relations between the sexes.

We aren’t revisiting the age of Victorianism; we’re entering a new age of Misandrism. Anyone who denies this is willfully ignorant or malicious.

Women are unhappy, but instead of reflecting on the choices they make in their personal lives and at the voting booth and how those choices have contributed to their unhappiness, they have decided at the behest of their Narrative gatekeepers to direct all their incoherent rage against men, specifically White men.

And it’s showing up in Shrillennials, who are separating by sex into antagonistic camps.

This isn’t controlled for race, so one has to assume the browning of America in the past two-three decades accounts for some proportion of the leftward lurch among Shrillennial women.

Nevertheless, the trends are apparent, and disheartening for red pilled White knights. Women in every generation except Silents (the oldest generation) have turned to the Snark Side. Female Millennial bluehairs and brownbears have lurched so far Left they may as well be concubines at pantifa BBC cuck parties.

The oldest women — the Silents — know what has been lost, and what we are rapidly losing, and they have responded by being the only female generation to turn Rightward. This generation is probably also the Whitest.

But we knew all this already.

What we didn’t know, perhaps, is the gumption and fortitude remaining in a contingent of normal-T Millennial men.

Men in general are more Republican — and more right-wing — that are women, but unlike their women the Millennial men have shifted a little bit away from the Left and to the Right. (Boomers and Gen X men have both shifted to the Left. Silent men are as based as you’d expect interpolating from their women.)

Diversity can’t explain this (unless there are more vibrant females than vibrant males in America). The shift is small, but notable, as it comes in the headwinds of their women marching frantically in the opposite direction.

What gives? It’s the Misandry. Millennial men are at the front lines of this Cunt’th Wave Feminist orgy of man-hate, and they recoil in fear and disgust.

It’s the Diversity. White Millennial men are watching their women lay with the Other in historically record numbers. No matter how shitlib the male shitlib, there is still a spark of life in his atrophied soyheart that stirs indignantly when his women are pillaged by invading tribesmen.

And it’s the Sexual Market Restructuring. Millennial men are standing idly by as their beta bux are strip mined by a corrupted social contract, by student loan debt, by a services economy favoring HR gossips, and by mass immigration gutting their wages and pricing them out of the livable housing market to feed a voracious urban shrew maw that sacrifices its prime fertility years and partial birth aborted children to alpha fux and credentialist gluts.

I welcome this Separation, for in it we will find Clarity, and an open view of the Battlefield and of the nature of our Enemy.

If Millennial men — the most pozzed and soyed generation of men in American history — are beginning to wake up, hang on, because that portends a much bigger change over the horizon…

Read Full Post »

Get ready for an id-scorcher of a study. Feminists (male and female) are on stand-by, their eyes pre-welling with salty tears.

Perception Of Rapists As Successful People Decreases Likelihood Of Crime Being Labeled As Rape, Study Finds (Via)

Executive Summary: HSMV alpha males are given a rape pass, LSMV beta and omega males get the book thrown at them for daring to look below a girl’s chin.

Never mind the feminist gobbledygook attempting to reframe the study results as an example of a mass self-delusional belief in the SOMETIMES WOMEN LIE “false myth“. The results are far more revealing than the feminist researchers dare to explore.

CH coined the term “Regret Rape” (or Retconned Rape) to describe the false accusations that women make when they’ve willingly slept with a man who didn’t call them back the next day and gave them the sads.

Unfounded rape charges are twice as high as any other felony. More women lie about being raped than about any other criminal perpetration upon them. Why is this? One, women gain a lot from passing off a rape lie. Psychologically, they gain “re-virginization” from an awkward welling of regret after, say, a one night stand (or a UVA shattered glass ganglia rape). Socially, they gain an air lifted provision of support — financial and emotional — from family and friends. They also avoid potential social ostracism from dating badboys. Finally, some women are simply malevolent and impulsive, and utilize the expedience of a false rape accusation to slake a thirst for vengeance or to assuage a bitterness brought on by sexual market failure. (Recall from CH tomes of yore that success in the sexual market is defined differently for women than it is for men. If women don’t extract commitment from a worthy man, they have failed.)

And false rape accusations, vile as they are, are undoubtedly encouraged by rooted social and legal incentives. If the jurisprudence, academic, and media industrial complexes are biased to favor women’s accounts of lurid sexual events, then some women at the margins will be tempted to leverage that spontaneous favoritism for their own ends. This is precisely what happened in the catfishing UVA rape hoax story.

These women regret having given their bodies away so freely, and to absolve themselves of accountability they turn to retconning the previous night’s sexytime as an assault, and to smearing the men who reneged on their part of the implicit deal to reward the women’s sexual favor with the men’s romantic, financial, and protection services.

The study discussed in this post is sort of the mirror image of Regret Rape.

In Regret Rape, you have a woman deliberately mischaracterizing a consensual sexual encounter as a nonconsensual assault to save her reputation or salve her ego (among other possible psychological motivations). See: UVA rape hoax, mattress girl.

In Reconsidered Rape, you have disinterested third parties interpreting a rape accusation, or the accusing woman herself interpreting her less-than-ideal sexual encounter (later regretted), through the lens of a nuanced, consensual basis if the accused man is high sexual market value and made the woman feel good about herself. If the accused man is lsmv, he’s toast. NO BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT FOR YOU, GOON SIR!

The underlying revelation is the stuff of paradigm implosions. The REAL subconscious reason that people are less likely to assume the rape-y worst about an hsmv man is because they grasp, on a darwinian level, the evolutionary truth that women actively seek the attention and company of hsmv men and DELIBERATELY PUT THEMSELVES IN HEATED SITUATIONS in which intimacy is more likely to occur with those kinds of men.

People recognize, on an instinctual level, that women sometimes, maybe even often, “ask for it” — “it” meaning sexual adventure —  when the man involved is a high value alpha. Those alpha men don’t come along every day for women, so women tend to lose their self-control around them.

Just as men tend to lose their good sense and aloof calm when in the company of a stunning beauty.

It’s akin to that moment Trump exposed a cosmic truth when he boasted that women “let you grab them by the pussy”, if you’re a billionaire playboy. He was right, and it had nothing to do with nonconsensual groping, despite ugly, unloved catlady insisting to the contrary. The women who wormed their way into hsmv Trump’s sights, and flirted with him like they never did with boring betas, inching closer, tossing hair, batting eyes, giggling like little girls….these women would not have objected all that convincingly if, as they were thrusting their pelvises forward, Trump placed a hand on the opening invitation.

It gets darker still. People, as well as the “victim” herself, also intuit that sex with an alpha male is HOTTER if he is aggressive and takes liberties with the prim and proper boundaries she normally establishes for garden variety beta males taking a glancing stab at her…heart. She will walk away from 60-40 consensual sex with an alpha male perhaps feeling on a logical level like she was taken advantage of, but it will have felt SO GOOD and SO RIGHT that she post hoc reconsiders the unsavory parts of her seduction as beautiful romantic abandon in the arms of a delightfully undomesticated beast of a man. This is Reconsidered Rape.

This is not to say alpha male rape doesn’t occur; rather, it’s a nuanced description of a real, working sexual market — instead of a fantasy devised in Wymyn’s Studies thothouses — in which alpha male sexual attention that would get a beta or omega male hauled before a feminist tribunal is massaged by both third parties and by the participating woman as a consensual gray area.

Reconsidered Rape is the hindbrain realization that men and women are constitutionally different in all the ways that matter, and male power is a lure to women which female power is not to men. A powerful man known to his accuser will therefore be given benefits of the doubt in accusations that involve a woman’s participation, because everyone knows, deep down, that the woman wasn’t a totally innocent victim, as would be a woman who was accosted in the middle of the night by a Dindoo in an Alleyℱ.

And, just as I have predicted, we are seeing this biomechanical reality play out in the Weinstein trial, as evidence is presented that most of Weinstein’s “victims” were glorified prostitutes who knew what they were getting into when Weinstein dangled…roles…in front of them but who might have had, from among the hundreds of cock suckings they gave Weinstein, one or two rough cocksucks that weren’t sufficiently softened with sweet nothings in the aftermath.

The solution to Reconsidered Rape is the same as that for Regret Rape: don’t allow your society to devolve into an alpha fux, beta bux plunderdome.

PS Related:


Read Full Post »

Aaaaaand Alexandria Of-Color comes out in favor of stealing wealth from Whites to pay reparations to browns and blacks.

Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stated on Monday that the United States should pay reparations to the non-white communities who were negatively impacted by America’s New Deal.

“I think the first thing that we need to do is realize that there’s a balance between this more universal struggle for racial, social and economic dignity, but at the same time, not erasing the individual stories of different communities,” Ocasio-Cortez responded when asked how government can create a just outcome among its citizens.

“You and I are in the same struggle. That does not give me a pass to not talk or acknowledge the black experience and that does not give you a pass to not acknowledge or talk about the plight of Puerto Ricans and people overall,” Ocasio-Cortez told interviewer Ta-Nehisi Coates. “It is in that exchange, and to say ‘you are distinct and you come from a distinct community that is valued and uplifted’ and vice versa.”

The only struggle I hear is AOC struggling to convincingly parrot the intersectionalist bullshit she picked up in college.

The self-proclaimed Democratic socialist contended that while people tend to associate reparations with slavery, instead, they should be associated with the effects of The New Deal, which, she argues, disproportionately impacted non-white communities.

Under the new rules of the United States of Alexandria Ocasio-Camacho, Whites will pay the GIBSgeld until the last White person’s bank account is emptied. Given enough demographic power, nonwhites won’t need the imprimatur of long-past slavery to justify robbing Whites blind.

The New Deal was a series of public works projects, financial reforms and government programs that were enacted in the 1930s by Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt as a response to the Great Depression.

“People think reparations is reparations for slavery, but really, economically speaking, reparations are for the damage done by the New Deal and redlining because that is where we saw a compounding of the existing inequity from the legacy of slavery, where we drew red lines around black communities,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

Racial policies like redlining had very little lasting impact on the status of blacks. Redlining was a reaction to black dysfunction, not a cause of it. The arrow of causality is messed up from decades of propaganda, which Alexandria Of-Polychromatic has dutifully absorbed. Black biology ===> redlining to avoid black biology.

Btw, the worst case of “racial discrimination” (according to shitlib standards) occurred in Japan — two nukes were dropped on two cities, leveling them both to the ground — and today both of those cities gleam with life and vitality. Funny how “keeping the jap man down” didn’t keep him down for long.

“We said white communities will get home loans and they will get access to the basic bedrock of wealth in America and this will be your heirloom and we gave white America the heirloom that appreciated overtime, that people still benefit from today and we did not give to African-American and Mexican communities, Puerto Rican communities.”

Did AOC pick up that “heirloom” touch-phrase from a Dem (((handler))) or during a Woe Is Woman 101 lecture?

FYI the United States was 90% White and 10% black in the 1930s. Other races were a tiny fraction of the total population. The Mexican and Sassy Reekin’ communities were practically nonexistent during the New Deal era.

The New York congresswoman also compared the treatment of non-white communities in America’s past to the Holocaust, urging the United States to follow Germany’s example by paying reparations and acknowledge the suffering that occurred during Nazi occupation in order to move forward.

More blacks were killed in the last twenty years in Detroit than blacks who died from lynchings over the entire history of the United States.

And just lol that somehow White America has failed to “acknowledge the suffering” of blacks. Holy fuck what planet is this ditz on? The last six DECADES have been nothing but a daily cuckbeat of pandering to blacks and begging their forgiveness.

“It’s important to tell the story of where we’ve been and what others are doing as well because we look at, for example, Germany, and how they’ve been able or they’re attempt to try to heal after the Holocaust,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “Germany paid reparations and they went through that process and they had that truth-telling process. And until America tells the truth about itself, we’re not going to heal.

Yes, America needs more truth-telling about racial realities like disparate aptitudes, behaviors, preferences, and temperaments. But that’s not what AOC means. She means White America hasn’t prostrated itself enough to the swarming aPOCalypse. “Heal” in her context means “bend the knee, White man, or we will bend it for you”.

She’s a right proper puppet for Globohomo. Such an accomplished liar, BSer, and tribalistic shell entity.

The truth about AOC is this: she’s a garden variety anti-White bigot. Nothing special about her beyond that.

A reader objects,

In fairness she has a pretty sweet set of milkers?

She’s one of these chicks who looks kinda pretty from a distance, but up close it’s a WHOA MYSTERY MEAT moment.

Another reader,

I can’t wait til she’s president and we go into full Rhodesia mode.


AOC gives interviews like she used to bantz as a barmaid: loose, unstructured, vapid, and immune to facts, logic, or coherence.

In other words, the typical middling IQ solipsistic thot.

From a White man,

Funny, though, she’s dating a white guy named Riley Roberts… I’m sure he’s a self hatin cuck but regardless, I find it hilarious that these white-hating individuals talk so much shit about whites yet still want to fuck us.

Don’t let the media tell you otherwise. The White man is still the apex sexual market prize to the world’s women.

Sure, she has decent milkies. She better served America as a bartender.

From Nate,

Anytime somebody seriously talks about implementing reparations from whites to blacks, we should counter with proposing that blacks should have to pay higher taxes to support the extra police required due to their higher crime rate. Shift that overton window rightward.

It’s insane that white->black reparations aren’t immediately dismissed and laughed off whenever brought up. It’s straight-up race-based theft, and 90% of people have been conditioned to view it as within the acceptable bounds of policy discussion.

America has turned into an outdoor insane asylum. The lunatic fringe is everywhere.


Crossing my fingers that AOC is “our girl” and Mobster Girl Nancy P is being forced to play a role. Less optimistic on the latter after the MLK weekend shenanigans

AOC has her usefulness. She gives shit to Dem hacks and can’t be touched because “woman of color with little girl sociopath voice like Blasey-Ford”. I hope AOC continues discombobulating the Dems like Trump does to the Cucklicans, but the inescapable reality with her is that she’s just another Al Sharpton with an updated poopytalk lexicon.

Every AOC in America right now:

Is anyone else sick of this anti-White man shit? I sure am.

PS Steve Sailer’s excellent effortpoast, “Identity Stalinism“.

Read Full Post »

As always with shitlibs, male or female (but especially the female), it’s psychological projection from here to eternity.


Comment from Angry White Old and Privileged,

She cannot get this kid off of her mind because that smirk, that posture, and that defiance in the face of a weak man using his “indigenous” genetics to bully and intimidate… Well, it gets her going and makes her think, “Why can’t I get with a man who is as strong as this teenager instead of these milk toast soyboys?!”

Then, like many on her side of the ideological spectrum, both male and female, she begins to wonder, “Is it really so bad to be turned on my this teenager? I mean, he’s a young adult, after all, and age /is/ just a number, right?” As she secretly considers she should have become a teacher.


She saw the handsome guy from high school who didn’t ask her out in that smirk.

So true.

Valenti’s epic RBF is what happens to a woman who has imbibed a lifetime of shrill feminist cuntery, bittersweet pump and dumps, weak unconfident attention from periphery beta males, and finally marriage to a wrist-flapping soyboy with the right credentials but zero charm.


Commenter Pbar divulges Valenti’s courtship which landed her the Hubby Soy,

From an NYT article about JV’s first date with future husband; ‘Here also was a woman that he found impossible to say “no” to — as he learned that night when she insisted he try the ceviche. “I soldiered on,” said Mr. Golis, who has always detested “fishy fish.”…he held up his end of the conversation as the ceviche soured his stomach to the point of nausea.

They shared a cab from the restaurant, but he bolted as soon as they reached the apartment where he was staying, fearing that he might vomit.’

So on their first date, she insists he eat something that he hates. Instead of leaving immediately and meeting his friends at a bar, he does as she says. And spends the rest of the evening trying not to puke. Then he marries her. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Modern Woman and Modern Man.

The sexual polarity in that marriage is inverted, upside-down, and turned inside-out. No wonder Jessica dreams of smirking smirklords.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: