Archive for the ‘Feminist Idiocy’ Category

Video shot aboard a Gay Mulatto (Barack Obama) campaign flight in 2008 shows him flaunting his hard-on to female reporters who position themselves for a better look.


#Pussygrab is kid’s play in the “patriarchal misogynist sexual assault” feminist guide book compared to Gay Mulatto’s literally showcasing his half-blood chub to a plane full of INDIGNANT AND OPPRESSED women who should be championed and revered. That dipshit feminist category is now wholly owned by #BarackMamba.

Remember that these shitlib female reporters giggling like schoolgirls at the sight of gay mulatto’s stiffened snake (Reggie Love must have fluffed him) are the SAME FUCKING HYPOCRITES FEIGNING OUUUUUUUUTRAGE over Trump’s raunchy frat bro banter spoken in private to Billy Bush.

I’d say FUCK THIS GAY AMERICA, but a better send-off might be FUCK THIS WOMANISH AMERICA.

Hey feminists, your hero is manspreading! And not just any spread; this one comes with a dill pickle!

PS How much you want to bet the shitlib estrogenic media had this video in their possession in 2008 but suppressed it to help obama win?

Read Full Post »

thecunt has been saber rattling for war with Russia. I wish that was hyperbole. She is an insane evil witch who hates Putin for whatever godforsaken neocon reason and would work hard to thrust America into a land war in Asia, her finger shaking with Parkinson’s as it dangled over the nuke button.

But maybe there’s another, even more twisted, motivation for thecunt’s rush to an unwinnable war?

Days of Broken Arrows explains,

Hillary wants to send your sons off to war so your daughters will get their jobs. It’s a deliberate attempt to kill off large segments of the male population.

Maybe it’s conscious on her part; maybe it’s unconscious, but the end result is that lots of men will be pulled from the labor force making way for women. I’m surprised no one else has picked up on this. To me it perfectly explains why she’d be gunning for a war with Russia before she’s even in office. Has she been pushing for a female draft? No. Therefore, a large-scale war would be the ultimate “full employment” program for women.

The final solution for feminists, so to speak.

A feminist utopia.

I’ve been saying from the beginning that thecunt is a man-hating dyke. Literally. She hates men and she eats pussy. This is why she was so quick to forgive Bill’s affairs; she didn’t give a shit. Her heart was with other women. This is also why Trump’s unapologetic alpha male masculinity enrages her. She has a visceral hatred of men, and especially of men who act and look like men. It’s no wonder her campaign is filled with bitterbitch cat ladies, gay men, and effete nümales. Not a drop of testosterone between them to offend thecunt.

*The title of this post is modeled on the typical Salon article.

Read Full Post »

Feminists suddenly embrace the idea of heritable intelligence when they think it can be shown that it’s passed on to the kids through the mother. Except this latest ignorant tabloid review of the available science is complete bunk. There is no evidence that IQ comes solely from the mother.

The premise defies common sense as well. Does anyone seriously believe a smart woman having kids with a functionally retarded man would not raise the odds of her kids being born a few avocados short of a guac bowl?

I wonder what Greg Cochran thinks of all this nonsense? The pop acculturated “””science””” and the alacrity with which the feminism-soaked media lap up any shitshow story that can remotely be twisted into an anti-White man narrative have become the norm rather than the exception. The omens of Western Decline accumulate by the hour.


Commenter Opinionator adds,

The purpose of this is to propagandize White women into mating with other races.

Bingo. I really don’t like going to this poisoned well very often, but it demands noticing. (((Who)) (((is))) (((pushing))) (((this))) (((race-mixing))) (((propaganda))) (((the))) (((hardest)))? It’s slapping us in the face. If you’re getting slapped in the face by the same hand over and over, will you be satisfied by chiding entreaties to ignore the hand and blame your inflamed cheek for putting itself in the way of the swinging hand? Maybe you would, but not for long.

Read Full Post »

Hillary’s id emerges for a romp in this video: a scolding, entitled, screeching, mentally unhinged, hysterical, stilted, crazy-eyed sociopathic harridan with late stage parkinson’s.

Yeesh. Dat awkwardly artificial pitch change at 0:10. This is the look of desperation. Scott Adams on the clip: “the election is over“. Hillary’s voice and mannerism are crypt-onite to straight White men. I can’t listen to her for more than 30 seconds before I want to punch a hole in the wall. She’s distilled post-menopausal evil.


Read Full Post »

A couple of serial rapists are profiled by The Daily Fembeast because they had accounts on the Real Social Dynamics seduction arts forum. The bitter feminist cunts smelled chum in the water and are working double time to smear good-natured ladies’ men through guilt by remote association with a few random bad seeds (whom I’d never heard of until I read the article).

Since PUAs and consent are in the hivemind news, I figure this a good time to recap the Chateau crib sheet on what does and doesn’t qualify as sexual consent. Stripping out all romantic context (sometimes a woman’s breathlessly whispered “no” really is a surreptitious arousal-amplifying invitation to the man to continue resisting her coyness), the legalistic basics of hookup look like this:

If a girl is drunk and she says yes to sex- it isn’t rape.
If a girl is sober and she says yes to sex- it isn’t rape.

If a girl is sober and she says no- it is rape.
If a girl is drunk and she says no- it is rape.

Fleshing out the above basics to conform more closely to the reality on the ground that hookups take two to tango, here are the additional by-laws governing the validity of rape accusations should a sexual congress occur:

  • If the girl and man are sober and the girl angrily says “no”- it is rape. (the vast majority of (white) men can tell, and will heed, when a girl is sincerely uninterested in further intimacy)
  • If the girl is blackout drunk and the man is sober- it is rape, if the rape was initiated while the girl was unconscious.
  • If the girl is drunk but conscious and situationally aware and a willing participant, and the man is sober- it isn’t rape. (this is a not uncommon occurrence for the simple reason that it takes more drinks and a longer time for men to reach happy drunkenness; thus an early-evening sexual intimacy can start with the girl more drunk than the man but wind up a couple hours later with the man equally as drunk as the girl)
  • If the girl is so drunk she can’t give consent AND the man is so drunk he can’t know whether or not the girl consented- it isn’t rape. (sorry, femcunts, the drunkenness sword cuts both ways)
  • If the girl is sober and the man is too drunk to understand or give consent- how the fuck is his johnson working?? and why is she sticking around at his place when she could easily leave while he’s in a stupor on the floor?

The mythological rape culture that feminists secretly wish would come to fruition is actually a projection of their desire to see a world in which women are exempted from personal responsibility and men bear all the burden of any female regret for romantic trysts that don’t end in two kids and a house in the suburbs.

This is why feminists (of the lite or heavy genus) strive so mightily to protect women’s prerogatives to drink like Russian poets and slut it up like two dollar street whores. Feminists don’t want women to even THINK about the necessity of taking a modicum of personal responsibility for limiting their alcohol intake or curbing their skank signaling; to admit to that much would, in the feminist worldview, concede that the sexes are innately biologically different (they are regardless of heated denials to the contrary) and that men aren’t the only sex capable of transgressing moral norms. As CH previously wrote,

if you are a woman who is afraid your inner slut might escape to have sex under the influence with a man at a party who is also under the influence, it’s up to you to refrain from drinking a lot or attending that party. The responsibility to remain sober — or at least avoid getting lights out drunk — should not rest solely with the man.

If feminists are truly interested in not being treated like morally undeveloped children under the law, they will agree to my definition of rape. But since feminism is about power dynamics and not at all about fairness or justice, they will never agree.

In a female sexuality-liberated market it’s a secularist sin worthy of livelihood destruction to advise women to stop drinking like they’re fraternity pledges trying to prove something. But if feminists are truly interested in decreasing the incidence of late night drunkenness rape (aka morning after regret rape) they’ll counsel women to be careful how much they imbibe while out on the town. Since they don’t counsel that, and in fact advocate the opposite that women should be free to drink as much as they want in sexually charged public venues, it’s obvious feminists aren’t really interested in reducing rape rates.

The sticking point for feminists, of course, is that “stopping short of drinking to oblivion” and “dressing a little more modestly than a ghetto hooker” harkens the return of a “patriarchal” culture that “places demands” on women. Well, yes. Demands are placed. It’s called adulthood. Maybe feminists could live up to their female empowerment bloviating and leave the childishness of immunity from moral agency behind.

Read Full Post »

Hillary Clinton……excuse me, thecunt…..has made genital herpes acceptance part of her campaign.

You think I kid. I kid you not.

Hillary Clinton Thanks Woman for Shattering STI Stigma in A Powerful Letter

Hillary Clinton’s powerful letter to a 24-year-old writer living with genital herpes is striking a nerve on social media.

Dawson shared the letter in a Tuesday tweet, prompting a story on the Washington Post.

Clinton praised Dawson for speaking candidly about genital herpes and taking a stand against the hateful rhetoric that women often encounter on the internet.

“I am so grateful to you for not only speaking out against the stigma,” Clinton wrote, “but for also taking a courageous stand against the ridiculous, but very real, barrage of hate you received online.”

“The erosion of civil public discourse is one of the most concerning developments in our society today,” Clinton went on. “As you point out, the internet is not a friendly place for women, and you are not alone in facing the relentless onslaught of baseless, personal attacks.”


That’s the prematurely aging slut with genital herpes and the thousand-cock stare, on the left. Her name is Ella Dawson. (Twatter handle: @brosandprose) I have no problem revealing that, because neither does she. As a strong, empowered, and vaginally adventurous woman in The Current Year, she is very proud of having contracted a sexually transmitted disease, so proud that she wants everyone else to pat her on the back for fucking a battalion of dirty-dicked jerkboys (probably half of them black).

“I have never seen a politician understand the danger of the Alt-Right,” Dawson wrote. “It made me sad that a fringe hate community has become so central to American politics that a presidential candidate has to make a speech about them. But it also filled me with genuine, raw hope for the first time since I became an activist.”

Something’s raw with her, but it’s not hope.

“My work consists of raising awareness of STI stigma”

This is possibly the most Millennial feminist sentence ever written.

FYI, Ella, there’s a good reason why certain afflictions have a stigma. Dirty hos are stigmatized as a warning to other women who might be tempted to follow your path and acquire a petri dish of STDs and regret. Agitating to remove the STD stigma is an insult to people suffering from diseases that aren’t the result of poor life choices and low impulse control.

But hey if you really want to remove your genital herpes stigma, how about a centerfold of your chancrous cunt, the weepy labia spread for the world to admire? That’ll exorcise those man-hating demons inside you for good.

Enough of this attention whore. The real story here is Hillary Clinton aka Illary, who is now so mentally rekt by her neurological illness that she thinks genital herpes acceptance is a winning campaign issue.

How obtuse can a presidential candidate get? Who is this going to appeal to, besides bitter lonely feminists and their gayfag BFFs? Whatever she gains in xojane readers she loses fifty times as much in normal Americans who aren’t yet on board with the notion that the crotch diseases of street whores are worthy of the same sympathy as cancer patients.

Thecunt is going down in a landslide in November, and it will be because of her hubris, and the hubris of her shitlib feminist supporters, who live in a culture bubble and can’t conceive that millions of people think differently than they do, or that their shitlib project to ulcerate healthy human instincts isn’t yet a fait accompli. The alt-right Basket of Deplorables was the first gut punch they’ve received since wresting power of all the cultural megaphones, and they are reacting exactly how you’d predict a bloated, complacent piggish enemy to react: with squealing, impotent horror and rage.

The next beautiful shiv will be the killing blow.

Read Full Post »

The Daily Mail wonders if we Westerners are living through a time period when the numbers of aggressive, unfeminine, caustic, ball-busting battle-bitches are on the rise.

I think we are. And I’ll tell you why it’s happening. First…

So seemingly serene is the 51-year-old that she even soothes others in the course of her career as a reiki therapist. [ed: wtf?] But, like an increasing number of respectable women, Jo has become so consumed by rage that even a simple trip to buy the weekly groceries can lead to frighteningly aggressive outbursts. Recently, she completely ‘lost it’ when another driver tried to take the space she wanted in a Tesco car park.

Jo’s response was instant, and utterly disproportionate. ‘I was there first. So I got out of my car as he approached and shouted: ‘F*** you, a*******, I’m staying here until I get this space.’

‘The driver was a man much bigger than me, but I wasn’t intimidated. I told him we’d be stuck there all day if he didn’t move — which eventually he did.’

There’s the problem right there. If the Gynocratic State didn’t leash men, women wouldn’t be testing men’s patience like this cunt did.

Worryingly, it would seem this is a dangerous trend, seen by many as yet another dark side of equality.

Equalism is a false prophet heralding decay, misery, and eventual capitulation to nonbelievers.

Stories of professional women drinking themselves into ill health, trying to keep up with male colleagues are well documented.

Nothing good comes from reversing the sexual polarities.

But they are now matching men on the aggression front, too, putting themselves in physical danger — risking their good name, career prospects and relationships. In 1957, men were responsible for 11 violent offences for every one perpetrated by a woman — today, that is four to one.

Some of this shift towards more female violence (if accurate) is owed to the race replacement pogrom in Western countries. White women are fairly pacifist by world woman standards.

Add to the mix long hours, pressure juggling work and family life, plus fluctuating hormones caused by the menopause, PMS or childbirth and it’s no wonder so many women are exploding with rage.

I would’ve said “childlessness”. Failing at their most important life job has got to make careerist tankgrrls feel a little peeved.

Indeed, earlier this month it was reported that Oxford-educated Jocelyn Robson, a company director, 40, etched the word ‘c***’ in capital letters on two of her former boyfriends’ cars after they broke up.

“Oxford-educated”. “company director”. I guess it would be redundant to add “Maestro of Manjaws”.

And last month BBC presenter Jeremy Vine released footage of a woman — smartly dressed and driving a top-of-the-range car down one of London’s most expensive streets — who swore at him to ‘get the f*** off the road’ and allegedly kicked his bicycle.

These are the kind of women that men pump and remorselessly dump. And then these masculinized women have the gall to wonder why they have trouble finding a husband.

Research has also found that women are significantly more likely to be verbally and physically aggressive to men than vice versa — something physicians are seeing more of in their clinics.

Correction: BETA men. Since it’s obvious to anyone who has trawled a social media account that the ranks of weepy supplicating beta males in the West is at an all-time high, it’s no wonder women are lashing out at them. Weak men are like fat women: each defies the opposite sex’s romantic needs.

‘We are treating more women than ever who are struggling to regulate their emotions and express themselves appropriately,’

Sounds like the typical problem of men. This is what it looks like when the modren woman’s estrogen level are as low as the modren nümale’s testosterone level: bitterness, spite, aggression, acting out from an uneasy feeling that the world ain’t right.

And why is this anger afflicting so many upstanding women, the sort you might hope would be immune to, or too ashamed of, having outbursts?

“Upstanding” translated from the equalist leftoid mewlspeak means “over-credentialed careerist shrew”.

Some experts suggest women believe that such outward displays of aggression allow them to seize the initiative from traditionally dominant men.

NOPE. That’s not it. The usual feminist answer to these sorts of social changes is never the right one.

The right answer is that power abhors a vacuum. And nobody abhors the loss of male power more than a woman, who will rush in to fill it with nagging, passive-aggressive bitching, and closed legs.

Whether it’s in the workplace or around the dining table, shouting, swearing or throwing things are increasingly viewed as valid methods for women to assert themselves.

Aggrocunts aren’t interested in asserting themselves. What they’re doing is crying out for a chance to be a feminine woman again who doesn’t have to assert herself.

Such outbursts can also become addictive, a form of almost animalistic release.

Women who are regularly dicked by a self-entitled ZFG jerkboy feel no need for further animalistic release.


But as well as this rush, Jo also admits to feeling under constant pressure to provide for her family.

Economically self-sufficient gogrrls betray the essence of their sex.

Thankfully Steven who works with disabled children,

Nümale pussy.

has learned how to cope with her outbursts. As mild-mannered as Jo is volatile, he’s found that the best thing to do is to walk away and let the tantrum burn itself out.

Wrong answer.

Right answer: SHUT THE FUCK UP JO *readies pimp hand*

Her stepchildren, too, have learned to walk away from her outbursts.

Mix-and-match broken family. Cunt stepmom. Shit writes itself.

‘Our relationship is still strained, which is a shame, but I feel convinced she is as much to blame as me.’

Pathologically narcissistic BPD supercunt spotted.

And when, last year, she decided a driver was too close behind her as she kept to a 30mph speed limit, she braked suddenly and got out of the car. ‘I asked the driver, a young man, what the hell he thought he was doing driving up to my bumper,’ she says. ‘My heart was pounding as he called me a bitch and drove off.’

A young shitlord, to be precise.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, she has upset family and friends with her behaviour. In restaurants, she has embarrassed loved ones by high-handedly sending back food she considers isn’t good enough.

By the way, if a woman ever does this on a first date, you have complete license to exit through the kitchen and leave her with the bill.

Executive Summary:


Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: