Archive for the ‘Funny/Lolblogs’ Category

A White prankster (who’s doing more good for the cucked world than he can possibly know), bix noody-trapped his bike with a taser, and then left the bike unattended and unlocked in his neighborhood, recorded by a hidden camera. Hilarity and uncomfortable pattern recognition ensued.

See if you can spot the common denoginator.

Reader quixotic adds context:

This is freaking hilarious

So reddit is freaking out because fans of Trump have turned the site from a liberal safe space into a painful (read: honest and realistic) forum.

The video was posted to a thread and people familiar with reality noticed that hey all these thieves have something in common…

That did not go over well with the censorship loving lefties who dont like that
reality doesn’t match up with their oasis of equality. Now the thread is nearly scrubbed of comments that discuss the fact that the thieves are all dindus. Every day we get closer to 1984.

Also thanks for your help fellas i picked up my first AR this weekend people were in a frenzy for a m m o and finding lowers

White “asserted virtue on the cheap” shitlibs will just have to come to terms with the lovefact that White morality doesn’t port smoothly to other races. Assuming nonWhites share the same moral and ethical impulses as Whites is a mission-critical error of judgment.

Projecting White morality onto other races was always going to end in tears. And caustic laughter.


The same prankster did something similar with an empty, unlocked car and a fake bomb in the backseat. The usual suspects turn out for their shot at YouTube fame.

Read Full Post »

Once again, SCIENCE! affirms Chateau Heartiste maxims and squats lumply on feminist mythology while unloading a phallus-shaped deuce. A deep state study finds that there’s a neuroanatomical basis for the observed sex-based difference in emotion regulation.

As expected, males significantly scored higher in emotion regulation ability than females did. More importantly, we found the sex differences in the neuroanatomical basis of emotion regulation ability. Males showed a stronger positive relation between emotion regulation ability and regional gray matter volume (rGMV) in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In contrast, females demonstrated a stronger positive relation between emotion regulation ability and rGMV in an anatomical cluster that extends from the left brainstem to the left hippocampus, the left amygdala and the insular cortex. The present study provides the first empirical evidence regarding the sex-linked neuroanatomical correlates of emotion regulation ability. These findings may help understand why there is a higher prevalence of affective disorders in females and maladaptive behaviors in males.

SCIENCE! and CH: dancing the duet of fated lovers. This study literally discovers neurological proof for the truefact stereotype that women are more hysterical than are men. State control…it’s a man thing. You women just wouldn’t understand.

I gotta wonder how self-deluded feminist are gonna spin this latest out-take from the HARDASFUCK sciences?

RANDOM MANJAW: “well, you see, that’s just the patriarchal culture influencing female fetuses and changing their brain wiring.”

THE SHIV OF PRIVILEGE: “is the patriarchal culture also influencing female fetuses to become raving lunatic feminists?”

PS The last line in that study abstract is lethal thoughtcrime (literally). Mood (affective) disorders largely afflict women because their brain structure provides a more fertile (heh) environment for hysteria and related emotional malfunctions to flourish. Men, in contrast, have a sex-specific brain architecture that predisposes them to the opposite: emotion-less disorders that characterize ailments like autism, psychopathy, and anti-social behavior.

PPS The Game relevance should be evident. Tap into a women’s roller coaster emotions and you can guide her to expressing herself in the way that matters most to *your* emotional needs.

Read Full Post »

Sam Hyde, funny guy and Trollocaust survivor, has taken his ballsy street theater — punking shitlibs on their turf — to the airwaves. His show, “Million Dollar Extreme Presents: World Peace“, has premiered on Adult Swim. It airs Fridays at 12:15AM, Eastern Time. (I haven’t watched it yet, but plan to. Anyone who has, chime in with your thoughts.)

Here’s Sam asking an asian girl about her asian privilege:

Sam Hyde earns CH’s Shiv of the Week. He sets a good example for aspiring shitlords everywhere.

(One reason Sam effortlessly trolls shitlibs into self-mockery is that he’s a sturdy dude. Most of his targets are smaller, and this disparity would reduce the risk of a prompt physical altercation while increasing the odds of a tempered humorous exchange.)

Read Full Post »


Walking on the shiv’s edge.

FYI, the Chateau guest list includes dissident musical talents.

(whorefinder: rape against the machine!)

Read Full Post »

You’ve all read about the “thousand cock stare“, and most of you have seen a woman exhibiting it in your daily life. Now there’s a male version of the thousand cock stare — the thousand cuck stare — and it has nothing to do with a high number of sex partners, (just the opposite, really, as the thousand cuck stare is usually coincident with involuntary celibacy and a legacy of romantic failure).


Those eyes are seen on two types of (typically white) males: Literal bottoms (who have just passed a wet gas bubble of gay lover sperm) and figurative bottoms who are psychological castrati eager to bend over for the world’s cunts, ingrates, and swarths in a bid to rationalize that severely low T can be a blessing for humanity.

The thousand cuck stare is a watery, degenerate Sanpaku-eyed window into the soul of a male who has embraced powerlessness out of necessity and rubs out dopamine rushes by posturing as an androgyne happily relinquishing any trace of testicular fortitude for abject prostration at the cankles of the femborg hivegine.

He is a soy-drenched, sexual market discard who pretends his groveling at the feet of those who despise him is a righteous blow for equality and unctuous unisexuality. He is a contemptible loathsome creature who by dumb luck is having his day in the sun, but who will, as natural law dictates, soon be back where he belongs, foraging the icy wastelands for scraps of charity.

In two generations, when majestic Trump Presidency memorials dot the nation’s landscape, will the grandchildren (however few and miraculous) of these grandcucks recall with great shame their emasculated forebears as warnings against denigrating masculinity?

Read Full Post »

From a 1973 interview by Italian leftist Orianna Fallaci of the Shah of Iran, Reza Phalevi.

Q: How strange, Your Majesty. If there is a monarch whose name has always been associated with women, it’s you. And now I’m beginning to suspect women have counted for nothing in your life.
A: I fear your suspicion is justified. Women, you know… Look, let’s put it this way. I don’t underestimate them, as shown by the fact that they have derived more advantages than anyone else from my White Revolution. I have fought strenuously to obtain equal rights and responsibilities for them. I have even incorporated them in the Army, where they get six months’ military training before being sent to the villages to fight the battle against illiteracy. Nor should one forget that I’m the son of the man who removed women’s veils in Iran. But I wouldn’t be sincere if I asserted I’d been influenced by a single one of them. Nobody can influence me, nobody at all. And a woman still less. In a man’s life, women count only if they’re beautiful and graceful and know how to stay feminine and… This Women’s Lib business, for instance. What do these feminists want? What do you want? Equality, you say? Indeed! I don’t want to seem rude, but… You may be equal in the eyes of the law, but not, I beg your pardon for saying so, in ability.

Q: Aren’t we?
A: No. You’ve never produced a Michelangelo or a Bach. You’ve never even produced a great cook. And don’t talk of opportunities. Are you joking? Have you lacked the opportunity to give history a great cook? You have produced nothing great, nothing! Tell me, how many women capable of governing have you met in the course of interviews such as this?

Q: At least two, Your Majesty. Golda Meir and Indira Gandhi.
A: Hm… All I can say is that women, when they are in power, are much harsher than men. Much more cruel. Much more bloodthirsty. I’m quoting facts, not opinions. You’re heartless when you’re rulers. Think of Caterina de’Medici, Catherine of Russia, Elizabeth I of England. Not to mention your Lucrezia Borgia, with her poisons and intrigues. You’re schemers, you’re evil. Every one of you.

“You’ve never even produced a great cook.” 😂

Was the Shah of Iran wrong? Hyperbolic, sure. Affected with that paternalistic condescension so common among Middle eastern men, yes. But basically right. Look what’s happened since… women have turned away from being beautiful, graceful and feminine, and coincidentally the West is in a free fall to oblivion.

Bonus Shah wisdom: in praise of authoritarianism when the governed populace is too dumb and low trust to allow them to Rock the Vote.

Q: God forbid, Your Majesty, but would you deny that you’re a very authoritarian king?
A: No, I wouldn’t, because, in a sense, I am. But look: To go through with reform, one can’t help but be authoritarian. Especially when reform takes place in a country like Iran, where only 25 percent of the inhabitants can read and write. Believe me, when you have three-quarters of a nation afflicted with illiteracy, only the most strict authoritarianism can ensure reform; otherwise nothing can be achieved. If I hadn’t been strict, I couldn’t have carried through even agricultural reform, and my whole program would have been at a standstill. If that had happened, the extreme left would have liquidated the extreme right within a few hours, and more would have been lost than the White Revolution. I had to act as I did. For instance, to order the troops to fire at those opposing land redistribution. So that to assert there is no democracy in Iran…

Western shitlibs (and cucks) will need to come to terms with the reality that certain racial and ethnic groups require a firmer hand to guide their nations toward, if not peace and prosperity, a stable equilibrium between Western-style democracy and chaos. Unfortunately, shitlibs and cucks will never come to this realization because they lull themselves into a moral preening stupor with visions of cable news broadcast purple-tipped fingers pointing up their asses.

Read Full Post »


WOMAN: Hulking, sullen, traps that could stuff an NFL running back.

MAN: Effete beta, deferential to his wife, smug libfag smirk because he’s proud of himself for signaling his male feminist bona fides. (“Ladies and gentleman…my beard! I wouldn’t be where I am today without him..er, her.”)

COUPLE: Bitter black affirmative action queen who longs for real black man dick, and spiteful tragic hipster gay mulatto who adopted black power identity and hates White people, especially his late mother with the boy’s name and lifelong penchant for fucking District 9 set extras.

CONTEXT: President and First Macaque of the United States of America.



Beta males, especially those of the cuck variety, have a knee-jerk urge to publicly elevate their wives to positions of influence in their lives that are all out of proportion to reality. Jeb!, Kasich, Cruz…they all did it. A little self-abnegating generosity toward the wife is fine until it turns hyperbolic and comically supplicating. Beta males still haven’t learned that the handicap principle is easy to abuse and backfire on them, and that a man has to show a little alpha gumption before he can safely indulge some oily deference toward women.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,609 other followers

%d bloggers like this: