A reader forwarded this photo, and I’m still laughing.

Posted in Alpha, Beta, Funny/Lolblogs on May 13, 2016| 151 Comments »
Posted in Culture, Funny/Lolblogs, Goodbye America on May 9, 2016| 73 Comments »
Yesterday I saw an It
that cursed my sight and gave me fits
this It I could not tie in with
anything come before It
I may even admit that this It
was too illegit to quit
a man’s face It had
(formless chin to brow)
a man’s shoulders It had
(sloping to a bow)
even a man’s hands It had
(hard work they disavowed)
but the strangeness that would occupy
my thoughts till morning cleared my mind
was the shorts It wore
mid-thigh, no more
but tight around
the middle mound
except there weren’t
no middle mound
where legs did fork
you’d expect to note
a roll of pork
not an empty boat
the material gathered
into telltale bunches
of wrinkles and creases
that supported hunches
Its member was tucked
deep in asscrack behind
or queasier still
had untethered the pine
and showcased so proud
to an audience, astound
a missing link
a disorienting cline
where once was a peen
there now was a gine
(poem inspired by real life spectacle)
(ps fuck this gay america)
Posted in Alpha, Beta, Current Events, Funny/Lolblogs, The Id Monster, Videos on May 8, 2016| 49 Comments »
What happens when a low E manjawed bitch teams up with a slimy beta male? This:
Painfully awkward. It’s clear Fiorina is trying to one-up Scruz with the classic hand-over-hand domination play. (This aggrocunt even looks like a M2F post-op.) Cruz, sensing the submissive under-handshake Fiorina is forcing him to betray, attempts a counter-maneuver to save face (save hand?). It fails badly, as horse-faced Fiorina is not a woman to go down without a fight…. especially when her opponent is a beta male.
For the record, if you ever find yourself in the mysterious position of publicly declaring solidarity with your token vagina VP choice Fiorina days before you have to drop out of the nomination race and a week after you were mathematically eliminated, the alpha male strategy is to grab her hand quickly to complete the victory gesture, denying her the window of opportunity to do likewise to you.
Posted in Beta, Current Events, Funny/Lolblogs, Videos on May 3, 2016| 82 Comments »
Same video, different angle, full conversation.
Best laugh I’ve had all week.
“You are the problem, politician.”
“Where’s your Goldman Sachs jacket at? We know your wife works there.”
“The question we should be asking is….”
“Are you Canadian?”
By the way, Scruz really is a chronic liar. He claims Trump was telling his rally-goers to punch people in the face, referencing that one time Trump offered to pay the legal fees of a man in the audience who punched a grabby shitlib protestor. Which is not even close to the same as instructing his followers to punch people’s faces.
Ted is so easily triggered. TriggeredTed!

Posted in Current Events, Funny/Lolblogs, Shiv Of The Week, Videos on March 27, 2016| 59 Comments »
The Trumpening earns Shiv of the Week for this soul shot:
I’m sure that Trump will accumulate plenty of SOTWs between now and his inauguration as Leader of the Fashy World.
Posted in Current Events, Funny/Lolblogs, Psy Ops, The Id Monster on March 26, 2016| 106 Comments »
Commenter jackmcg came up with a clever parlor game.
Want to test your phrenology skills? [ed: minor quibble, but technically, this would be testing your physiognomy skills]
I looked at the hashtags for each presidential candidate, and grabbed the profile pictures of 10 supporters for each. 5 women and 5 men. I took the first ten that I saw, so it’s as random and unbiased as I could make it.
So which supporters go with which candidate? Clinton, Sanders, Trump, Kasich, Cruz.
Anyone who wants to try I’ll let you know if you get it right.
Click on it for a larger, clearer view.

Fun stuff! Here are my guesses:
Group 1: Kasich or Cruz
They look pretty conventional, middle America, nice White lady vibe from the women, and cuck vibe from the men.
Group 2: Trump
Men aren’t smiling, have that shitlord look to the eyes. UNCUCKED. The women look like they enjoy the company of men.
Group 3: Cucksich or Cruz (leaning Cruz)
Sunglasses, military, flag shirt, guitar. The men are good ol’ boys. The women look friendly but also a little mentally unstable. Possible religious nuts?
Group 4: Sanders
Men: Baseball hats, beards/goatees, and that Quentin Tarantino-ish faggotry about the face. Women: exotics, cat ladies, and art and crafts hippies.
Group 5: TheCunt
The men are all weird-looking omegas, and one of them is doing something stupidly ironic in his profile pic (sipping on an iced coffee). The women look like manjawed lawyercunts and sluts. Two of them are wearing “problem glasses”.
You can find the answers here., along with PA’s 5/5 winning picks and reasoning behind each one. I’ll give myself 4.5/5. The sexually de-polarized manjaws and omega males were the easiest; those are Hillary folk!
PS PHYSIOGNOMY IS REAL
Posted in Biomechanics is God, Funny/Lolblogs, Science Validates Game on March 23, 2016| 176 Comments »
There’s nothing quite like a sharp semantic shiv that hits a vital. But did you know slurs evolved to serve a social purpose? And that there are sex-based differences in the perception of slurs?
We investigated the influence of the sex of the target and the sex of the sender on the judgment of slurs (verbal derogation). From previous research, we selected and clustered slurs into seven categories and respondents rated their degree of perceived insult in two consecutive questionnaire surveys (N = 281 and N = 224, respectively). Results confirm that slurs are generally judged as being more insulting when directed towards females than towards males.
The fundamental premise: Women are the reproductively more valuable sex, and this biological reality has downstream effects on human psychology. This is why Trump (PBUH) catches so much flak for insulting fat, caustic pig Rosie O’Donnell or slimy gotcha “reporter” Megyn Kelly, yet no one cares when he levels worse insults against the hundreds or even thousands of men who have landed in his target designation cross-hairs.
In comparison, differences in sex of sender were small. When directed towards females, slurs referring to “being loose” were rated as the most insulting.
That’s because it undermines the female prime directive to attract and keep a high value man with promises of fidelity (aka paternity assurance).
For both target sexes, remarks referring to homosexuality and physical unattractiveness were among those rated as the most insulting.
I guarantee you the homo slur was rated more insulting by men.
Least insulting were slurs referring to unethical acts, lack of intelligence and cowardliness.
This is why I usually favor a rhetorical attack on shitlibs that hits them where it hurts: their sexual androgyny and circus freak physiognomy. Although I don’t buy the finding that “stupid” isn’t an effective insult, especially when aimed subversively at the pencilnecks whose only source of pride is their MENSA membership.
A sex of respondent effect was found, suggesting that women rated slurs generally more insulting than men. The pattern of results showed considerable stability across surveys attesting for the reliability of the method for measuring the social evaluation of slurs.
Rank of slur effectiveness, least to most shivvy:
Character
->
Economic status (more effective against men)
->
Social status
->
Smarts
->
Looks (for women, less so for men)
->
Sexual worth (“slut”, “nerd”, “creep”)
The most vicious slurs circumvent the superego and ego, striking at the pith of the id, where the rawest measure of a man is contained: his (or her) worth as a mate.