Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Globalization’ Category

The shitlib demand for Whites Doing Bad Things greatly exceeds the supply.

The shitlib demand for Vibrancy Doing Good Things greatly exceeds the supply.

At the intersection of these market realities, shitlib mendacity crashes into shitlib insanity.

I came to this formulation about how the Virtue Sniveling Market governs shitlib behavior after reading Moses’ comment on the “Shitlib Ego” post:

CH: “The lesson: never give the Left an inch. They’ll take a parsec. Confederate statues today, books authored by White men tomorrow, until it finally reaches end game: second class status for all Whites outside of a few Acela elites who sufficiently grovel at the altar of anti-Whitism.”

This can not be emphasized enough.

No matter what shitlibs do, it will NEVER be enough for them. Their whole belief system is built on lies. They MUST HAVE an oppressive enemy to keep their believe system from crashing down.

Today it’s confederate statues. Tomorrow it’s removal of any Great White Man from any place of honor in our society — Jefferson and Washington removed from currency (gasp, slave holders!), schools renamed, shaming of White children, it goes on and on.

Demand for “evil whitey” far outstrips supply. So they manufacture more. Like a fire, it simply will not stop and will grow until the fuel is exhausted.

I’m running out of hope.

They absolutely cannot be reasoned with. It leaves violence, and violence only, as the unavoidable end-game. It will be violence from based White Men or violence from Islamics, but violence all the same.

The major limitation of the Virtue Sniveling Market, at least from the perspective of shitlibs who love to never practice what they preach, is that the kind of virtue shitlibs want — Vibrant Virtue — is scarce, while the kind of vice that shitlibs want to snivel against — White Vice — is as scarce as virtue is among Vibrants.

So, as Moses correctly states, shitlibs will manufacture Evil Whitey lies from whole cloth, while simultaneously excusing the worst predations of nonWhites as the consequence of conveniently hidden Evil Whitey forces. Since lies are the coin of the shitlib realm, there is simply no internal brake on their agenda, no end to their game that doesn’t feature war by whatever means and either the eventual subjugation and destruction of White Civ or the total and complete ousting of shitlibs from positions of power and influence.

Unfortunately, since shitlibs have at the moment no real pushback from anyone in power, (the alt-right is effective but don’t mistake that for institutional power), the likelihood of war in the not-so-distant future, maybe even a real hot war, between rival White factions — between say localist Whites and globalist Whites — is greater than it otherwise would be.

It all comes back to Leftoid Equalist lies about race and sex, and the pacified cowards who abet their lies.

As long as cucks/the controlled opposition refuse to grapple with the reality of race and sex differences and everything downstream from those, the Globohomo Bathhouse Alliance will continue winning the rhetoric war, even if a million nail bombs go off in every city of the West and welfare-incentivized dysgenic breeding rots the edifice from within.

The Alt/Maul/Balls-Right, far from being the dire threat to civilized society the Mendacity Merchants would have you believe, are a last gasp salvation for the West and call to redemption for the cucks who have betrayed their claimed principles every step of the way. Appeasing milksops will never find their own way, but stronger harder men can inspire them to break out of their vaginal prisons.

As Trump might say, only losers snivel for virtue whoring status points.

Read Full Post »

The anti-White miscegenation propaganda pushed by Pedowood, marketing departments, ad agencies, and Globohomo, Inc appears to have had an impact on Americans’ mate choices. I have noted recently that I’ve observed an uptick in mixed couples in both red and blue towns. The numbers coming from Pew Research vindicate the focus of my eagle eye.

More and more Americans are marrying people of different races and ethnicities, reaching at least 1 in 6 newlyweds in 2015, the highest proportion in American history, according to a new study released Thursday. Currently, there are 11 million people—or 1 out of 10 married people—in the United States with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of US Census Bureau data. This is a big jump from 50 years ago, when the Supreme Court ruled interracial marriage was legal throughout the United States. That year, only 3% of newlyweds were intermarried, meaning they had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. In 2015, 17% of newlyweds were intermarried.

“There’s much greater racial tolerance in the United States, with attitudes having changed in a way where it’s much more positive toward interracial marriage,” Daniel T. Lichter, [ed: ((()))?] director of the Institute for the Social Sciences at Cornell University, tells the AP. “But I think that a greater reason is the growing diversity of the population. There are just more demographic opportunities for people to marry someone of another race or ethnicity.” Researchers say Asian-Americans were most likely to intermarry in 2015, with 29% of newlywed Asians married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, followed by Hispanics at 27%, blacks at 18%, and whites at 11%.

Don’t get too excited about that relatively lower outmarriage rate among Whites, because the absolute size of the US White population means that Whites will have a lower outmarriage rate compared to nonWhites who are (for now) demographic minorities. If there are 10 marriageable asians and 100 marriageable Whites and three couples are asian-white mixes, then that means a 30% outmarriage rate for asians but only a 3% outmarriage rate for Whites.

A few thoughts:

I’m not surprised asian-Americans outmarry at the highest rate (and I presume most of those marriages are asian women to White men). Culturally and educationally, and probably genetically, there’s less distance between asians and Whites than there is between blacks and Whites. Asian women love White men (OkCupid data revealed that asian women respond at a higher rate to White men than they do to asian men).

Asian women are also, on average, thinner than their White female counterparts, and I can’t impress upon women enough that men, especially high value White men, really HATE HATE HATE the thought of sex with a fat chick. The obesity epidemic is pushing a lot of White men away from White women and into the yellow fever swamps.

The de-masculinization of White men and de-feminization of White women are two trends accelerating the outmarriage of White men to asian women. White nerds who get nowhere with White women will find a more receptive audience among asian women, whose own men are uber-nerds in comparison. If a White nerd wants to feel like Adonis (or any Gentile God Hero), he’ll hitch himself to an asian woman.

“Asian” is a broad category. Are ching-chongs, kimchees, and nips the predominant outmarriage culprits, or is it the flips, gooks, and pakis? Clarity in all things.

“Race or ethnicity” is also a broad category. If interethnic marriages are included in the total outmarriage rates, then that would sweep up all the intermarrying White ethnics — Poles with Dutch, Irish with Germans, English with Italians, etc — which is to say the least a very misleading lump-stat intended to demoralize Whites into believing there’s been a massive uptick in Whites marrying nonWhites. As a commenter at the linked article put it,

Hmmmm … so does this mean that the marriage between my wife, a Scottish-German-Irish American, and me, a Franco-Italian American, is counted as a “marriage between different races or ethnicities”? If so, then I think your “1 in 6” statistic is ridiculous, because it has nothing to do with race. In particular, Americans have been marrying across ethnic lines for generations. Virtually everyone in my family has married someone of a different ethnicity since the 1940s. I therefore find it extremely hard to believe that marriage rates across ethnic lines in America have increased much in the past 50 years, since they were already high 50 years ago. That said, if what you really meant to say is that marriages across racial lines have increased greatly in America and are now 1 in 6, that fact would be significant. So did you mean that 1 in 6 American marriages now cross “racial” lines? Or just that they cross “racial or ethnic” lines? And if the former, why didn’t you simply say so? And if the latter, why report this at all, since it’s not news?

FYI, a big reason “White nationalism” is more salient in the US is precisely because of all the marriage across White ethnic lines over the generations, which has literally decreased the genetic distance (and therefore the cultural distance) between American Whites. Paging MPC

Diversitopia™ may influence outmarriage rates (the argument being essentially, options = instability), but I wonder about that. The pre-Civil War black percentage of the US population was higher than it is now, but outmarriage between whites and blacks was virtually nonexistent then. However, a “raw numbers” argument for Diversity itself boosting outmarriage may apply if the racial minorities are closer to the White gene/culture norm. The huge influx of invader hispanics in the past thirty years must have been accompanied by a concomitant rise in hispanic-white couplings.

There are hispanics and there are “white hispanics” (aka diaspora Spaniards). I’d bet a lot of the hispanic outmarriage is with blacks, and the outmarriages with Whites are to phenotypically European Spanish-speakers. Few White men not named ¡Jeb! Bush are hitching themselves to squatemalans.

NOWSS (no one wants soul sisters).

Readers have asked, “tell us how you really feel about miscengenation?”. At the individual level, if deep love is truly the motivating principle, then godspeed to those mongrels. But even those lovebirds should know that they are putting their families through a lot of silent pain, and they might flinch a little inwardly if they gave serious thought to the disruption of their genetic and phentoypic lineage if they had kids. Aesthetic continuity matters; mongrelization destroys in one fell splooge thousands of years of evolutionary refinement.

That aside, my real beef is with the miscegenation propaganda pushers. Let love flower where it may, but for all that is holy don’t brainwash people into thinking mongrel love is any kind of special love that deserves glorification, pumped 24/7 into the eyeballs and eardrums of goyische kop who still cling bitterly to the quaint notions that one is ideally attracted to the opposite sex from one’s own race and that having kids who look like oneself is a normal and natural preference. Race-mixing agitprop that sublimates the propagandist’s subconscious genocidal urge is distilled evil, in my opinion.

White interethnic mixing that has occurred since the mid 1800s in America is not the same beast as modern mogrelization imposed on us by open borders third world enrichment. An Englishman and a German are distinct White ethnicities up until their respective gene streams, so unique to the sharp-eyed observer when meandering side by side, collide at the Dirt World delta and a vast muddy effluvium obliterates the sparkling European waters.

Read Full Post »

File under: It’s funny cuz it’s true.

Exhibit A: Pathologically Altruist Wolf

Exhibit B: Globohomo diversity

Read Full Post »

Get ready for the dusky enrichment. Libshit Brookings Institute squealed with delight when it released a report that modeled electoral college results going out to 2032, based on projected demographic trends within the US.

Positive values indicate Democreeps receive more electoral college votes than do Republicans. Negative values indicate the opposite.

Thanks to the magic of de-Whitening, by 2032 the Republicans will be essentially shut out of ever winning a national election again.

This was the Left’s goal from the beginning, and they are on the verge of total victory. But then Trump happened, and the victory parade celebrating the dispossession of Whites from their own homeland had to be put on hold. Hence, the slow coup to oust Trump currently being orchestrated by the leftoid media, Dems, GOPe, spoogled technoborg, Creep State, and every other Globohomo elite buttplug aficionado with zero kids and a granny bedmate. The future of America as an indivisible nation will be decided by events that happen over the next year. You are sitting front row, center seat to a titanic power struggle that may bring down — or save — the greatest outpost of White Civilization the world has known.

Read Full Post »

What other conclusion are we to draw when the voting behavior and opinions of single White women corroborates exactly what this post’s title asserts? From Bigly E, another id-buster post that reveals a leetle too much about the vagoconductive currents that emanate from single White women’s hindbrains.

Single white women are more opposed to a big, beautiful wall than Asians, blacks, or even Hispanics are.

*twatpalm*

Single White women are, presumably for those of them who still have a bit of bloom on the rose, actively trawling the sexual market for cad and cavalier. Thus, they are in their stage of life when all faculties, mental, emotional, libidinal, are focused to a pinpoint of estrogenic vitality, with the familiar shit-testing behavioral profile that vitality presupposes.

This means, single White women are limbically primed to be aroused by dominance and a ZFG attitude in men, and those men who fall short in these traits are dumped into the beta orbiter/friendzone with a quickness, when they aren’t rejected outright. The dumping can be literal, or metaphorical, as in a political friendzoning that weakens the electoral power of White men.

As a social phenomenon, a large chunk of America’s White men have spectacularly failed the dominance/ZFG test. America the Shitlib Feminist Shrike has effectively neutered White men, and unmasked them for romantically unappealing doormats to single White women. As women are wont by the essence of their sex to spread their legs for the dominant tribe’s men, they will wish to see tribal battles play out so that they may enjoy the luxury of choosing winners and their winning seed. The single White woman desire for open borders is nothing less than a desire for alpha male interlopers to test the mettle of their betatized male loafers. A massive civilizational shit test, if you will.

For this reason, it was always a mistake to entrust the nation’s future to its native daughters, especially while in their pulchritudinous primes. Women are more xenophilic than men and this difference goes deep, all the way to the Darwinian pulses in the primal part of the brain that regulate reproductive algorithms. No logic, reason, accountability, or basic common sense can defeat such a primitive force.

There aren’t many solutions to this intractable cognitive block in women’s hindbrains that don’t require serious divestment from the recently operative political and social calculus. Off the top of my head, here are solutions that would work (but just try hurdling the independent variables on your way to a solvable equation):

  1. rescind suffrage and disenfranchise single White women
  2. get more White women married off and pregnant at younger ages
  3. break America into regional entities, diluting the single White woman vote
  4. convince married White women to socially ostracize single White women by any means necessary
  5. make divorce harder for women
  6. economically and socially incentivize early marriage (e.g., conduct a massive draw-down of women from the workforce and cease glorifying single momhood and tankgrrl careerism)
  7. ban abortion and contraceptives (good luck with that)
  8. execute a vast, mass propaganda psy ops involving reframing of contentious national question issues and other rhetorical gambits that constitute the heart of Game to reorient the acceptable opinion avenues by which single White women gain social status rewards so that they find value in claiming the opposite of the self-defeating open borders beliefs they comfortingly regurgitate for now. (whether he knows it or not, this is the Trump Option.)

I welcome further suggestions from the commentariat.

An “overfeed the beast” strategy that I sometimes see entertained by crueler elements in the Exasperated-Right won’t work; if you dump millions of Dirt World trashkin into single White women playgrounds, all that will accomplish is an increase in the murder, rape… and miscegenation rates. The bleeding heart politics of these dumb bunnies won’t move an iota. No, the way forward is for White men to retake control of their homeland and scoff at the precious political boilerplate their women solipsistically indulge.

I can tell you that if we refuse to tackle our shared single White women problem, the nonWhite invaders will tackle the problem for us. And the way they solve it won’t abide feminist SWPL rules of conduct.

PS Cough up your black pills, because Trump’s firing of Comey may have opened the way to renew the investigation of thecunt’s email case while at State. I told you guys Comey was a lackey for thecunt. Get rid of him, and thecunt will start thinking about getaway plans to safe havens.

***

PA suggests motives for the single White woman signaling for open borders.

— The single White woman desire for open borders is nothing less than a desire for alpha male interlopers to test the mettle of their betatized male loafers.

Yes, I agree. Other reasons why normal young single White females (as opposed to gutter-grade trigglypuffs) think they want open borders, along with my estimate of the likelihood of that being one of their motives:

To enjoy brown d_ck: 5%

To have a mixed baby: 0%

To be on the top of an even taller female SMV pyramid: 90%

To increase the likelihood of *other* White women getting r_ped, k_lled, or kn_cked up by browns: a sobering 75%

To virtue-signal (read: follow a fashion) that they don’t yet know is about to go out of style: 100%

Female Suffrage. A mistake that will not be made again.

I meant to bring up this point in the body of the post, but PA’s #3 reason — to enjoy the instant social status ladder climb from importing a vast bottomfeeder population of lower SMV women and men — is probably the most subconsciously pertinent (and least remarked upon) motivation to single White women.

Read Full Post »

Ready to unload a withering guffaw? While reporting on migrant squatters loitering in Rome’s streets, an Italian leftoid news anchoress was assaulted live on camera by the same swarth-saharan trash for whom she was trying to drum up sympathy.

mamma kek-a!

First, this media globowhore is HOT. Would bang, multiple positions, multiple times. I might have to apply bronzer, dress like a jihadi, and warm up my pimp hand to get her interested though.

Bella Francesca is a data point in favor of my personal theory that at the high end of female SMV, Italian women (along with French women) are among the hottest on the planet. Too bad they aren’t reproducing and their countries will soon be swarming with hairy awrah. 4,000 years of unique evolutionary phenotypes down the drain in three generations. OH WELL DAT SWEET EUROSLUT HSMV HAD A GOOD RUN.

Second, this YouTube comment:

The Hungarian speaks the truth.

PS Word has it YouTube has already taken down a number of copies of this video, so catch it now before the One World Governing Panel on Affirmative Censorship memory holes this one.

PPS Related: commenter Passer By compiled a thorough list of stats (with source links provided) that proves women are more left-wing and pro-immigrant invasion than are men.

Read Full Post »

Ann Althouse notes that the leaders of Europe’s four biggest economies have zero biological children among them. (h/t reader pavetack)

Theresa May, UK, no children (unable to have them)
Angela Merkel, Germany, no biological children
Emmanuel Maricon, France, no biological children
Paolo Gentiloni, Italy, no children

May is the least cucked of these four, and it’s therefore unsurprising that her childlessness was a pained regret imposed on her instead of a lifestyle choice. (Gentiloni is wobbly on border control, to put it nicely.)

I’m sure exceptions exist in the historical record, but as a rule, it’s generally better if a democratically elected leader has children than not. The feeling of stewardship and kinship is heightened when one has a stake in the future of the nation via his or her blood-bound progeny. Merkel and Maricon have no stake in the future of Germany and France (sorry, stepchildren don’t count on a Darwinian level), and so they will be inclined to push globalist policies that expand the scope of nihilistic degeneracy at the expense of racial and cultural continuity.

This excerpt from Maricon’s platform is so revealing of the globohomoist death cult mindset,

Perhaps because he wasn’t carrying the burdens of an entire gender when accounting for his [family deformation] decisions, Macron seemed completely at ease. He was saying, less apologetically than I’ve heard it said by a politician, that his family would be what he made of it, and that this was a cause for celebration, not suspicion or pity. His platform backs up his rhetoric, making special mention of the “diversity of family configurations”—married couples, couples in civil unions, co-habitating couples, parents who are together, parents who are separated, single-parent families, blended families, and same-sex-parent families—and promising to insure them equal rights under the law.

“Blended families” is a microcosm of what Globohomoists like Maricon want to do to the entire White West. Blend it out of existence.

Maricon’s shitlib blather to the contrary notwithstanding, it’s socially responsible to cast suspicion and pity towards rejects, misfits, and freaks who accumulate dysfunctional family formations like mutational genetic loads. This includes Maricon, a closet case who’s banging dusty grandma muff and will leave no legacy beyond being France’s last peacetime leader before the Siege of Elysee by Suleiman’s gremlin heirs.

A “diversity of family configurations” is code for “death of the West”. What libfruits like Maricon are either unable to process or resistant to accept is the beautiful truth that some family formations are better than others, and that this hierarchy has its source in our very humanity, which would be snuffed out if Maricon’s deformed families were to become the norm rather than the oddity. If the Family Maricons of the world were equal in estimation and under law to fitness-maximized heterosexual families with biological children, then it should be no threat to humanity if there were more Maricons to “celebrate” and fewer normal families to blend into the tar pits of the vast Dirt World.

Except it is a threat. A Maricon France means no France at all, at least not in any historical sense. Mariconism is Mort, the squandering of seed in barren old lady womb, the disappearing of White French from their homeland to be replaced by more reproductively vigorous invaders from swarthlands.

With stakes this high, suspicion and pity of Maricon’s Unfamily Circus are tepid responses. Mockery and ostracism would be more appropriate reactions.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: