Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Globalization’ Category

In a post titled “Shamelessness” (invoking a similar CH post titled “The United States of Ingrates“), Steve Sailer links to and remarks on a JYTimes op-ed written by Shikha Dalmia (a name straight out of the midwest….of an asiatic shithole) demanding more immigration of her clan into America.

Commenter Buzz Mohawk riffs on this with pinpoint hilarity, earning him the CH Freelance Comment of the Week:

Of course, when Shikha Dalmia’s cousins all get here, they will, in turn, write NYT opeds demanding even more immigration because not all of _their_ cousins have arrived yet. And so on ad infinitum.

Americans, with our principles and rule of law, are no match for Clan Loyalty.

That’s a lot of shikhas.

And this is a lot of shiksas:

Which do we prefer? It should be up to us.

The problem is “us” is changing to “them”, and then it will be up to “them”.

And that is the whole point of open borders. Changing “us” to “them”.

Read Full Post »

From Second City Bureaucrat, one of the funniest accounts on Twatter:

This is what an aggressive-aggressive war looks like:

Read Full Post »

Ana Navarro, fat slob POC airhead who is tasked with farting out CNN’s daily anti-White agitprop, was caught on camera disdainfully filing her nails while a guest was talking about illegal alien (aka foreign invader) crime.

Class act. Ana Navarro can go choke on a double-wide burrito. Fucking c**t-faced b**ch.

This is what your replacements think of you and your kind:

Hear that? It sounds like accelerationism. And not the drunk driving dreamer kind.

Read Full Post »

Profound…

How much blame for the low fertility of developed nations can be placed on the disappearance of the geographically convenient extended family? In all the debates about below-replacement TFR I’ve read, this angle is criminally under-explored.

Maybe it’s not just high housing costs (read: high diversity costs) that are the culprit of low TFR; maybe a primary driver of reduced family size and childlessness is the expense of out-sourcing extended family care to unrelated third parties (corporations, daycare, nannies, etc).

If grandparents and aunts and uncles and cousins significantly contribute to easing the financial and emotional costs of having children, then their geographic dispersal and separation from any family connections would have a big impact on the willingness of young couples to take on child-rearing.

Globalism and its consequences (free movement of labor, job insecurity, fleeing from diversity) provides incentives to spread out geographically and away from the family “home base”. A low TFR decreases the number of extended family members with each generation, until even extended families that remain local don’t have enough members to assist young parents with the quasi-communal child-rearing.

A vicious negative reinforcement feedback loop sets up, until TFR crashes and outposts of high TFR White subgroups like the Amish inherit the future.

The virus in the code of Western society is the abridged family, and as usual the vectors of this virus are mass immigration, forced multiracialism, and rapacious wage-cutting oligarchism.

PS A reader insightfully theorized that the introduction of child car seat laws had a depressive effect on fertility, because car seats take up a lot of room, and middle class couples who want more children are forced to decide between buying a bigger, more expensive car, or not having that third kid.

Read Full Post »

The Fundamental Premise (introduced to a curious world on this blog) states that the biological reality of women’s higher reproductive value relative to men’s results in an inborn psychological bias in both sexes that manifests in favoritism toward women and indifference toward the plight of men, at the individual and societal levels.

Institutions will, over time, take on the complexion of this innate bias favoring women, and the smallest inconveniences women suffer are blown up into national emergencies while grave insults that are suffered predominately by men are minimized in their significance, ignored, or cruelly inverted to lay blame for that suffering on men and to make restitution demands for women who are the “real victims”.

Now the World’s Foremost Newspaper of Record has broken ranks and defied the cuntventional wisdom to report on a global study showing that men are the real victims of sex-based discrimination.

Men are disadvantaged in 91 countries compared to 43 nations for women

The UK, the US and Australia all discriminate against men more, a study claims

Italy, Israel and China are harder environments for women, researchers say

Scientists created the Basic Index of Gender Inequality to assess inequality

Closer the BIGI score is to zero the greater the level of equality is in the country

[…]

The UK, the US and Australia all discriminate against men more whereas Italy, Israel and China are harder environments for women, according to the study.

Researchers say this is due to men receiving harsher punishments for the same crime, compulsory military service and more occupational deaths than women.

Those are coarse metrics, but the Fundamental Premise acts on innumerable, less conspicuous social dynamics shaping the life outcomes and well-being of men and women.

The study was carried out by the University of Essex and the University of Missouri-Columbia and published in the journal Plos One.

Scientists created a database which deciphers a nation’s discrimination called the Basic Index of Gender Inequality (BIGI).

The closer the BIGI score is to zero the greater the level of equality is in the country.

Zero is a perfect score, indicating absolute parity between the genders – and Italy came the closest with a score of 0.00021. Slightly favouring males.

The top ranked nation to favour women over men is claimed to be Saudi Arabia, with a score of -0.001554.

If it is a negative number it indicates females are better off and if the BIGI score is positive it shows males are less discriminated against.

I doubt any regular readers of the Chateau are surprised by this study’s findings that the Anglocuck nations (where post-sanity feminism and the divorce industrial complex were invented) are the most discriminatory against men and their interests.

Professor Stoet also believes the complexity of the Global Gender Gap Index makes  it difficult to distinguish whether gender differences are the result of social inequalities or personal preference.

The simpler BIGI method, he says, is a much sounder alternative.

He said: ‘No existing measure of gender inequality fully captures the hardships that are disproportionately experienced by men in many countries and so they do not fully capture the extent to which any specific country is promoting the wellbeing of all its citizens.

Hillary Clinton would call Professor Stoet a misogynist while cavalierly dismissing the premature deaths of millions of opioid-addicted deplorable men in the heartland.

PS The Sex Pay Gap is a lie. I’ll keep saying it until the media stops credulously reporting on it as if it hadn’t already been debunked a thousand times.

Read Full Post »

If you tear down one big wall, a thousand smaller walls appear in its place. To wit:

“But walls don’t work”

Oh they do. They work very well, which is why shitlibs lash out so hysterically against any move toward building a national border wall. If walls were truly ineffective, Chuck Schumer wouldn’t kvetch so much.

The choice is a big beautiful wall at the nation’s border, or millions of smaller walls multiplying every day around the nation’s landmarks, gentrifying neighborhoods, gated communities, parks, pools, schools, and places of worship.

Human nature hasn’t changed. We wall off our precious homelands against invaders. If we let the invaders waltz in, then we wall off our precious homes from them.

Until there’s nothing left to wall off but ourselves.

Read Full Post »

I would say this is BAD OPTICS, but bad optics only matter when an objective media will amplify them, which the internationalist-occupied media won’t do.

So EU APCs (practically speaking, tanks minus the large gun turret) are free to crush a grass-roots, native son revolution while the media works overtime to conceal the awful optics from normies.

What’s gonna happen when there’s no longer a distinction between normies and yellow vests? What will happen when the yellow-vested ARE the normies?

vs

PS The yellow vest rebellions sweeping France are not only about a regressive gas tax. They are a howl from native Frenchmen who are sick and tired of their country turning into a third world dump by the actions of rapacious globalists.

DEUSVULT notes,

Morocco World News has more honest stories about the French Yellow Vest demonstrations than most Western media outlets. That should probably alarm us a bit.

Western Fake News has so thoroughly discredited itself that backwater news organizations from pre-civilized countries provide more trustworthy news.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: