Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘GloboHomoBezos Ministry of Propaganda’ Category

How does a woman let decades slip by and watch forlornly as she tumblrs from bodacious to barren? By deluding herself that her biological clock has more minutes on it than it actually does.

Sarah Haas, 35, says she feels like she has about five years to decide whether to have children.

*facepalm* At 35, the smart bet is that the lifespan on her womb has already reached the end. If she’s lucky, she’ll push out one underweight autistic problem child allergic to every food group except soy before her last egg is unceremoniously expunged in a portentous hot flash by age 40.

One can blame the feminist grrlpower gaystream media for pumping women’s hamster cages full of lies about their fertility and sexual market staying power, but ultimately it’s the fault of these women for hoping wishing fantasizing and persisting in the Fake Belief that they are just as sexy and, coincidentally, ripely fertile at 35 as they were at 25 and even more so at 19.

For Haas, 35, though, the assumptions are hard. She was in two long-term relationships, each lasting nearly a decade. If those didn’t result in a child, it must be because she didn’t want them to, right? Nope. It just happened that way. It was just life.

Cheap, widespread, and easy birth control has been a more potent Darwinian selection force than wars and famine. We are just now seeing the effects of that unnatural selection on the populations that have had effective birth control the longest, and the verdict is in: overrun by more fertile barbarians.

She separates it into “before” and “after.” In previous generations, many women had kids “before” — before career, before travel, before other elements of life. Now, Haas sees people who think of having children as “after” — after you have built your own, individual life.

Careergrrlism is civilizational death.

Haas can list the reasons that now isn’t the perfect time: Her career isn’t in an ideal place. Financially, it would be tough. Her current relationship is pretty new.

The prologue of Idiocracy, the most prescient movie of the past twenty years, nailed this female solipsism.

And, that biological feeling, that hit-you-in-your-gut urge that some women feel so deeply, has never struck Haas.

“I know a lot of women who know that they want to be mothers,” she says. “They know it. They don’t know how; they don’t know when; maybe they choose a life that doesn’t give them that, but they know they want to be mothers. And because either I can’t trust that feeling, or I don’t have it, I do wonder if that means that I shouldn’t. But at the same time, I know that I love children, and I know that I would be an amazing mother.”

Tragically, she won’t be making that decision for children; the God of Biomechanics will decide for her. And His avatar of intervention in human affairs — evolution — is a ruthless, merciless reaper of self-deluding fools. Her anti-natalism kind will, in short order, be washed from the earth into Hades along a Pill-polluted ovary-dead River Cysts, and we who have eaten the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Poolside and Evil can only hope that the barrenesses of the West don’t take White Civilization with them.

PS The Expired Woman is closely related to the Inspired Woman.

Read Full Post »

This is a homoshoot of NATO wives plus Melania Trump, winnergirl.

Behold soft, plush Europe, telegraphing for all the world’s barbarians that She is ready to bend over and take their invader seed. The rump roaster in the back is the “””husband””” of Luxembourg’s gay prime sinister, which I guess makes him the bottom.

And wtf is going on with some of these Euroshrews? How about old chicken legs on the far left trying to pull off the sexy teen girl look. Lady, don’t go above the knee if your entire leg is the same width as your knee. And who’s the broad in the tent and head covering? The Manchester bomber’s mother? Nice blood splatter dress on that middle giantess (probably Dutch). At least the two on the far right look bangable. Melania as usual looks great, a welcome change from the Jane Goodall jungle subject we had to endure looking at for eight years.

Anyhow, the alpha male’s wife is always the youngest, hottest, tightest, and most elegant of the bunch. (Luxembourg puts his hand to his chest, “why thank you!”) When men have options, they choose wisely.

Read Full Post »

A leftoid freak (black) judge (are these scumbags factory-pressed now?) ruled against Trump’s eminently sensible muslim immigration ban, (and not one day after yet another muslim atrocity), misusing the Establishment Clause as a jizz wipe to clean up his orgasm of feelz.

What a fucking disgrace. The Establishment Clause doesn’t apply to the whole world. It’s meant for Americans. If the whole world falls under the First Amendment’s protections, then in theory American voters, through their representatives, have no right to restrict the flow of invaders from any foreign country in any number at any time. The Zeroeth Amendment, as Sailer calls it.

WELP that’s a wrap folks. A Constitutional Crisis is coming, courtesy of rabid virtue sniveling anti-White shitlib nation wreckers. Let’s all take a moment to recall what happened the last time we had a major Constitutional Crisis.

And now a moment to reflect on what’s happening in our homelands today:

If there aren’t changes, BIG changes, soon, to redirect the Vector Negative that the West is traveling, the shit will hit the fan harder than even the most dedicated doomsday prepper could have imagined. Reminder that “checks and balances” applies to curbing excesses of the Judiciary as well as the Legislative and Executive. Which means (in the words of Anti-Gnostic):

Well, step two is people beginning to ask how many tank battalions the judges have.

Like I’ve said, there needs to be a culling of shitlibs from ALL American institutions of power. The shitlib saturation point has been reached and surpassed in nearly every important field:

Culling, not debate, is our only avenue remaining to make our voices heard and our votes count.

What’s at stake and coming for us: an enormous, unstoppable tsunami of Dirt World detritus.

Read Full Post »

The anti-White miscegenation propaganda pushed by Pedowood, marketing departments, ad agencies, and Globohomo, Inc appears to have had an impact on Americans’ mate choices. I have noted recently that I’ve observed an uptick in mixed couples in both red and blue towns. The numbers coming from Pew Research vindicate the focus of my eagle eye.

More and more Americans are marrying people of different races and ethnicities, reaching at least 1 in 6 newlyweds in 2015, the highest proportion in American history, according to a new study released Thursday. Currently, there are 11 million people—or 1 out of 10 married people—in the United States with a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of US Census Bureau data. This is a big jump from 50 years ago, when the Supreme Court ruled interracial marriage was legal throughout the United States. That year, only 3% of newlyweds were intermarried, meaning they had a spouse of a different race or ethnicity. In 2015, 17% of newlyweds were intermarried.

“There’s much greater racial tolerance in the United States, with attitudes having changed in a way where it’s much more positive toward interracial marriage,” Daniel T. Lichter, [ed: ((()))?] director of the Institute for the Social Sciences at Cornell University, tells the AP. “But I think that a greater reason is the growing diversity of the population. There are just more demographic opportunities for people to marry someone of another race or ethnicity.” Researchers say Asian-Americans were most likely to intermarry in 2015, with 29% of newlywed Asians married to someone of a different race or ethnicity, followed by Hispanics at 27%, blacks at 18%, and whites at 11%.

Don’t get too excited about that relatively lower outmarriage rate among Whites, because the absolute size of the US White population means that Whites will have a lower outmarriage rate compared to nonWhites who are (for now) demographic minorities. If there are 10 marriageable asians and 100 marriageable Whites and three couples are asian-white mixes, then that means a 30% outmarriage rate for asians but only a 3% outmarriage rate for Whites.

A few thoughts:

I’m not surprised asian-Americans outmarry at the highest rate (and I presume most of those marriages are asian women to White men). Culturally and educationally, and probably genetically, there’s less distance between asians and Whites than there is between blacks and Whites. Asian women love White men (OkCupid data revealed that asian women respond at a higher rate to White men than they do to asian men).

Asian women are also, on average, thinner than their White female counterparts, and I can’t impress upon women enough that men, especially high value White men, really HATE HATE HATE the thought of sex with a fat chick. The obesity epidemic is pushing a lot of White men away from White women and into the yellow fever swamps.

The de-masculinization of White men and de-feminization of White women are two trends accelerating the outmarriage of White men to asian women. White nerds who get nowhere with White women will find a more receptive audience among asian women, whose own men are uber-nerds in comparison. If a White nerd wants to feel like Adonis (or any Gentile God Hero), he’ll hitch himself to an asian woman.

“Asian” is a broad category. Are ching-chongs, kimchees, and nips the predominant outmarriage culprits, or is it the flips, gooks, and pakis? Clarity in all things.

“Race or ethnicity” is also a broad category. If interethnic marriages are included in the total outmarriage rates, then that would sweep up all the intermarrying White ethnics — Poles with Dutch, Irish with Germans, English with Italians, etc — which is to say the least a very misleading lump-stat intended to demoralize Whites into believing there’s been a massive uptick in Whites marrying nonWhites. As a commenter at the linked article put it,

Hmmmm … so does this mean that the marriage between my wife, a Scottish-German-Irish American, and me, a Franco-Italian American, is counted as a “marriage between different races or ethnicities”? If so, then I think your “1 in 6” statistic is ridiculous, because it has nothing to do with race. In particular, Americans have been marrying across ethnic lines for generations. Virtually everyone in my family has married someone of a different ethnicity since the 1940s. I therefore find it extremely hard to believe that marriage rates across ethnic lines in America have increased much in the past 50 years, since they were already high 50 years ago. That said, if what you really meant to say is that marriages across racial lines have increased greatly in America and are now 1 in 6, that fact would be significant. So did you mean that 1 in 6 American marriages now cross “racial” lines? Or just that they cross “racial or ethnic” lines? And if the former, why didn’t you simply say so? And if the latter, why report this at all, since it’s not news?

FYI, a big reason “White nationalism” is more salient in the US is precisely because of all the marriage across White ethnic lines over the generations, which has literally decreased the genetic distance (and therefore the cultural distance) between American Whites. Paging MPC

Diversitopia™ may influence outmarriage rates (the argument being essentially, options = instability), but I wonder about that. The pre-Civil War black percentage of the US population was higher than it is now, but outmarriage between whites and blacks was virtually nonexistent then. However, a “raw numbers” argument for Diversity itself boosting outmarriage may apply if the racial minorities are closer to the White gene/culture norm. The huge influx of invader hispanics in the past thirty years must have been accompanied by a concomitant rise in hispanic-white couplings.

There are hispanics and there are “white hispanics” (aka diaspora Spaniards). I’d bet a lot of the hispanic outmarriage is with blacks, and the outmarriages with Whites are to phenotypically European Spanish-speakers. Few White men not named ¡Jeb! Bush are hitching themselves to squatemalans.

NOWSS (no one wants soul sisters).

Readers have asked, “tell us how you really feel about miscengenation?”. At the individual level, if deep love is truly the motivating principle, then godspeed to those mongrels. But even those lovebirds should know that they are putting their families through a lot of silent pain, and they might flinch a little inwardly if they gave serious thought to the disruption of their genetic and phentoypic lineage if they had kids. Aesthetic continuity matters; mongrelization destroys in one fell splooge thousands of years of evolutionary refinement.

That aside, my real beef is with the miscegenation propaganda pushers. Let love flower where it may, but for all that is holy don’t brainwash people into thinking mongrel love is any kind of special love that deserves glorification, pumped 24/7 into the eyeballs and eardrums of goyische kop who still cling bitterly to the quaint notions that one is ideally attracted to the opposite sex from one’s own race and that having kids who look like oneself is a normal and natural preference. Race-mixing agitprop that sublimates the propagandist’s subconscious genocidal urge is distilled evil, in my opinion.

White interethnic mixing that has occurred since the mid 1800s in America is not the same beast as modern mogrelization imposed on us by open borders third world enrichment. An Englishman and a German are distinct White ethnicities up until their respective gene streams, so unique to the sharp-eyed observer when meandering side by side, collide at the Dirt World delta and a vast muddy effluvium obliterates the sparkling European waters.

Read Full Post »

From testimony given two weeks ago, May 3rd, by James Comey, FORMER FBI director, to Congress:

COMEY:
I mean where oftentimes they give us opinions that we don’t see a case there and so you ought to stop investing resources in it. But I’m talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason, that would be a very big deal.

It’s not happened in my experience.

Case dismissed. Comey testified long after his meeting with President Trump occurred that there was no attempt by anyone to thwart an FBI investigation for political reasons. Libshits ur done here.

Comey’s Catch-22 is this: Either political pressure from Trump to stop the Flynn investigation didn’t happen and Comey is now lying about what he wrote in a memo after meeting with Trump, or political pressure from Trump to stop the Flynn investigation did happen and Comey didn’t report it at the time and therefore lied under oath about it later in his testimony.

Was Comey lying during his testimony, or is he lying now about the context of his memo which he had a “friend” leak to the Nuevo York Times (being the pussy he is he couldn’t leak it himself)? Lessee, the weasel who dutifully bent to Gay Mulatto’s political pressure back in July 2016 to exculpate thecunt from all wrongdoing in her email case was just fired by Trump, so he might be a little bitter about it.

Phoney Comey is FUCKED, but I’m sure the Gaystream Media, which now is so depraved and united in their womanish rage against the dying of their Globohomo Order that they are the ones who give marching orders to their subservient Democreep Party, will find a way to frame their coverage to have Comey wrangle out of this smelling like a rosey.

The Maul-Right can’t let that happen. All memesters and shiv soldiers to the front.

Read Full Post »

Phony Comey is caught in a catch-22. A Comey-22, if I may amuse myself. When he’s called to testify before Cuckgress, he either has to admit his memo insinuating Trump’s obstruction of the Flynn investigation is a lie, or if true that he withheld important information about an ongoing investigation which is itself illegal. (And Trump should request ALL memos Comey kept over his tenure, especially those memos he wrote during dealings with thecunt and the Gay Mulatto.)

Phony Comey is a shitlib hillary shill, so his anti-Trump antics should not surprise anyone. This “memo” that Comey’s “friend” recited to the Nuevo York Times is, I predict, nonexistent or so watered down in actual substance that Comey will have to disavow his previous insinuations in his testimony. McCabe, the FBI’s current #2 and another hillary cuntfluffer, is already on record stating that the Trump Admin has not impeded their Russia investigation. So even if Trump said what Phoney Comey claims he said during their meeting, it had no obstructionist effect on the FBI’s investigation.

When will this clown show end? When Civl War 2 erupts, at this rate.

Read Full Post »

The Gaystream Media is in full-blown meltdown over Trump. He’s a man who shoots from the hip, and the media in its quest to destroy him — and don’t forget this means to destroy Heritage America who voted for Trump — has abandoned all journalistic integrity for clickbait generated by latching onto Trump’s extemporaneous riffing and completely stripping it of any context in order to frame Trump as the next Hitler.

I got to thinking what this reminds me of…women caught cheating. Confront a woman with incontrovertible evidence of her infidelity and she’ll be driven to hysterics, first denying the charge, then accusing you of distrusting her, then bashing you for being a horrible partner, then twisting your words to mean the opposite of what you mean to make herself look like the victim, then finally spitefully blaming you for pushing her into the arms of another man.

The Gaystream Media is that cornered whore, presented with solid evidence of their journalistic malpractice and zero integrity shilling for the globohomo agenda, who, knowing its credibility is shot, lashes out with hysterical fury and film reels of psychological projection. The womanish hysteria is what a busted cheating whore resorts to when the jig is up. Now all that’s left is for Trump and his supporters to hold their ground, stay firm, and show the door to the frazzled media.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: