Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Goodbye America’ Category

It seems by casual examination of the 2016 election results that the city-countryside political divide in America is hitting a zenith (or nadir).

whorefinder writes what this could mean for the future of America as a single political entity.

When empires are on the verge of collapse, it occurs when the political divide in the country is between city and country—or, more definitely, when the city folks don’t care about the country folks and vice versa. Happened in the Roman Empire, happened in the Ottomon Empire, happened in Persian Empire.

I don’t know the cause of such divides, but it becomes strikingly obvious when you read history: when city and country are the dominant political divides, the country is doomed.

City mouse and country mouse rape!

The geographic divide in 2016 has shifted from where it had been for decades — North vs South — to East vs West. That is significant. (Agnostic has lots of posts explaining why this shift was predictable.)

But as significant as that geographic shift is, it pales in comparison with the stunning bifurcation in voting behavior we now have between America’s dense urban Diversitopias and her rural and suburban provinces that blithely cling to a slim White majority population profile. I’ve seen analysis that showed this election had the largest divide between city and countryside of any election in US history.

whorefinder is right; the city-countryside divide — or SCALE-COMMUNITY divide — is an ominous portent of American collapse.

Scanman reminds us that our current city-countryside divide is not unique in American history. (But perhaps its Trump-era intensity is unique.)

The divide has been there since before Jefferson and Hamilton but I don’t know if it has ever been so stark and raw. Rural nationalists vs (diverse) urban globalists.

My money will always be on the guys who can change their own oil and know how to hang a door.

whorefinder replies,

The divide was there at that time–it was why the union was so tenuous during and after the Revolution. Southern agrarians and citified Northerners were at odds, and the South was very hard to convince to rebel against Britain compared with commercial centers in the North. But during later periods the divide waned—midwestern farmers became allied with eastern banking interests, etc. In the 20th century the divide all but disappeared after FDR’s realignment. But it has reemerged in the last few decades with a vengeance.

The Trump phenomenon has been compared favorably to the rises of Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, and Reagan, but I’ve been telling friends that Trump is most like FDR; a re-aligner who will, if he’s true to his word and character, usher forth the next era of classical egalitarianism of the kind the US had mid-20th Century during the “great compression”.

If Trump doesn’t succeed, and his successor is a Diversity Is Our Strength anti-White retread, then the urban-province divide will find a resolution in a second civil war; though this time the sanctimonious side won’t win. The military bleeds red state values, and the cities by themselves are easy to blockade and starve out.

Read Full Post »

Audacious E has an illuminating post about just how far Left the residents of America’s Capital City, Washington, DC voted.

How acidified by leftoid equalism are the brains of DC’s voting population? This: DC apparatchiks voted in greater number for thecunt than did blacks, liberals, and Democreeps nationally. wew lad.

Part of the reason for the discrepancy is the uh… exceptional nature of DC’s demographics. Self-identified Jews are 5% of DC’s population (and you can safely bet that percentage is higher once you include atheists, agnostics, nontheists, and (harhar libsnark incoming) “flying spaghetti monster” believers, among whom Jews are disproportionately represented). So Jews in DC are more than double their national representation. And as I’ve shown, Jews vote extremely Left even after controlling for mean IQ.

Gays are likewise more disproportionate in DC, at 10% of residents. That’s over four times their number nationally.

So right off the bat you’ve got 15-25% of DC’s residents about as deep in the pantsuit pocket of thecunt as one can go (before hitting dusty old vagina smelling vaguely of kebab). Gays, Jews, and gay Jews swarm DC’s halls of power. That’s a lethal Lefty combination. You’d have more luck hitting the lottery than finding a Trump supporter among that bunch.

Now add to that twee-brew a concentrated mix of extremely liberal White Gentiles with advanced manifestations of cuckface, gayface, pedoface, and gaypedocuckface, and you’ve set up a jurisdiction that, incredibly, votes more Left than even the shitlibbiest liberals outside of DC.

Trump had better hire his staff from outside DC, because the number of people he’ll be able to trust within DC is smaller than Jeb’s political stature.

There’s a larger point here that needs reiterating. Evoking Rome’s decline (because how can I not?), it’s a bad, very bad, omen when an empire’s Capital City is as ideologically removed and emotionally and financially detached from its territories as Washington, DC currently is from the rest of America. Trump honestly could not have arrived on the scene a moment later than he did. America is at the precipice.

A cabal of rootless globohomoists, puffed up to arrogant self-regard, breezily spending mounds of discretionary cash on tiny apartments and boutique furniture, eating at buzzy restaurants that will be gone in six months, and sneering contemptuously at those bigots in the heartland who have to work with their hands to make ends meet, is reminiscent of past empires’ capital residents, prettified and dandified as the revolution swept them away to their bitter, bloody ends.

All that’s left to wonder is if our insular, intellectually gated and egotistically myopic elites will acquire the good habit of self-reflection and humility and change course before their inevitably dreary fate is sealed.

I doubt they will.

Read Full Post »

Trump won’t formally be declared winner of the Presidential election until December 19th, when the electors cast their votes. Shitlibs are hoping against hope that a sufficient number of faithless electors will throw the Presidency to thecunt. They’d better be careful what they wish for; that outcome would guarantee a hot civil war. And their side will lose this time.

Lately, don’t be surprised to hear butt-chafed quimlibs mewl about ending the electoral college system (which, btw, would be a great time to remind them that Alexander Hamilton created the electoral college and was an ardent immigration restrictionist). The lib line of reasoning goes like this: “The electoral college was invented to stop demagogues from taking power, but now it’s moot because a demagogue just won the electoral college, so let’s go back to a popular vote for President that would ensure we win every election going forward with the help of our twenty million noncitizen voters (all inconveniently located in CA, so we need more Section 8 to disperse them across the heartland).”

When reading lib reasoning, it helps to run their scuzzwords through a leftoid-to-human translator.

“demagogue” = “an insufficiently anti-White public speaker”

“moot” = “no longer serves the interests of shitliberalism”

“voice of the people” = “a full-throated advocate for nonWhites”

“popular vote” = Is the margin of victory delivered by Whites? “dangerous nativism” Is the margin of victory delivered by nonWhites? “democracy in action!”

Leftoids love their buzzwords because they serve as vapid, arty veneers concealing an intellectual bankruptcy. And wow just wow is the Left intellectually bankrupt today. They survive on the fumes of a civil rights era kumbaya feelz-amplification cognitive-suppression protocol of studiously ignoring race and sex difference realities and viciously slandering nonconformists who stray from the equalist reservation.

Their recent demands for ending the electoral college are of a piece. The real reason they crave an anti-republican (in the generic sense) nationwide popular vote to decide the Presidency is that the election of a nonWhite demagogue (or White demagogue lackey for the nonWhites) is perfectly fine with them. A popular vote gives them the edge in a nation getting less White by the year, given they can exploit the huge lump of illegal alien voters squatting in CA and the southwest, and soon to overrun Texas. Once Texas falls to the migrant colonization, a Republican who isn’t a complete cuck for the “acts of love” streaming across the border will never again win the Presidency (assuming the electoral college is still operative).

It always comes back to this essential formulation: Leftoids hate BadWhites and will gladly virtue signal their country into oblivion to give meaning to their hatred. Any rationalization, hypocrisy, cognitive dissonance, inconsistency, or slander is acceptable if it furthers their goal of pulverising heritage America into dust.

As for the popular vote notion, it’s a non-starter as long as there is one state — CA — which would be able to impose its will, its values, and its policies on the rest of America. At the point in a nation’s history when one state can eternally dictate the terms of government for people living in a state 2,500 miles away, a serious consideration must be given to allowing that state to secede into a more morally cohesive entity.

The alternative that keeps CA within the union is to make a deal with shitlibs. Tell them they can have their popular vote, but only if they agree to a strict national voter ID law, paper ballots, and mass deportations of illegals that effectively removes a reliable source of Democreep votes from the rolls. This will ensure the added benefit of inching the White percentage of the total population higher, which would help reduce the cultural and political chasm between the deep blue states and the deep red states.

Shitlibs will never agree to this sensible deal, though, so I’m not hopeful about the future prospects of a whole America. I foresee a crack-up of the US within our lifetimes.

Read Full Post »

The rise in “regret rape” — my term for the post-cock, morning-after rationalization of a pump and dump night of consensual sex as an incidence of “rape” by bitter, sad, emotionally unstable women of middling SMV — is tied up with the explosion of gynocratic psychotherapy and the planting of false memories by malicious feminist therapists educated by the thousands in man-hating women’s studies programs.

All the recent research is converging on the conclusion that planting false memories in patients is easy to do. This presents serious problems for jurors in rape or sexual assault cases, who must somehow discern if a defendant’s recalled memories are real or phantoms implanted by an unethical bulldyke psychotherapist.

The UVA rape hoax foisted on a happily credulous media by zero integrity “journalist” Sabrina Erdely is a prime example of the feminist toxicity of THEE CURRENT YEAR and the nexus of false memory syndrome with regret rape. In this instance (and similar instances), the psychotherapist is the journalist egging on her subject — Jackie Coakley — to “remember” a rape that never happened. Jackie (butthurt from an unrequited love) obliges, and the two perform a dance of deceit in which the patient’s hastily-scribbled fantasy rape is fleshed out in gloriously sensationalist femcunt-friendly detail by an accommodating “””reporter””” who wants badly to further a feminist narrative about rapist White frat boys striking fear into the hearts of empowered wymyn who dare to challenge the patriarchal status quo.

Bullshit from rug to rafters, but what makes this bullshit especially smelly is that it can get real life innocent men thrown into jail.

False memory implantation has evolved and graduated beyond the psychotherapist’s office to the wider culture, amplified by the media and craven politicians and feminist “academics”. It is a real and growing threat to the fair and impartial functioning of the legal system, and if it isn’t addressed soon and rectified there will be many more innocent men paying the price for feminist ego gratification. The entire media/entertainment/academia gynocracy has taken on the role of the unethical femcunt psychotherapist, weaponizing the false memory plant and scaling it up to mass distribution.

Ironically, this feminist-fueled false memory project is ushering the rape culture they have gone on about ad nauseam, except it’s a very different rape culture than the one they wished existed….it’s a false rape culture.

Read Full Post »

A post retrieved from the Chateau Library of Lustful Congress explored findings from the darkest nooks of SCIENCE that there are genes which affect the ability to empathize, and that these empathy-boosting genes are more prevalent in White than in blacks.

In terms of destructive power on the shitlib psyche, that study is a MOAD (Mother Of All Dissonances). FACT CHECKS that strongly suggest empathy varies by race naturally lead to forbidden thoughts that the MORALITY which emerges from instinctive feelings of empathy varies by race. If one race is less able to empathize with an individual’s suffering or perspective, that race likely has evolved a moral impulse that is incompatible with the morality that governs societies created and maintained by races with greater empathetic ability.

Racial differences in moral feeling are even more nuclear to liberal sensitivities and their equalism ideology than are findings that mean IQ differs by race. It’s like taking a libfruit’s id and squeezing it until all the seeds of her self-worth squirt out onto the ground.

When you have an equalist priest on the ropes, you don’t give him a mercy time-out. You keep pummeling him until he collapses to the mat. With that in mind, here comes the knockout punch:

Non-Western kids are less empathetic than Western kids.

It’s in Danish, but my blurb above summarizes the findings (which were reported in a far left Danish paper). If there’s an enterprising CH reader who can translate for us, I’d welcome it. FYI, you can read “non-Western kids” as “nonWhite kids”, because in Denmark that accurately describes most of the immigrants.

We have a disease in White Western societies. It’s a condition called empathobesity, and in a globalist world with open borders and cheap airfare it will mean the self-annihilation of the West if a cure isn’t found soon.

All human groups — races and ethnies — vary in their moral dispositions. Some races are on average, quite simply, more moral than other races, if we measure morality by the utopian standard of WEIRDO liberal orthodoxy. Even within White nations, there will be variance in moral feeling among different White and quasi-White groups. More tribalistic Whites that have evolved to be clannish (or haven’t evolved away from clannishness) will have a comparatively stunted ability to empathize with strangers. Their moral reasoning will seem to emerge from without rather than from within, and it will lack the distinctive character of self-reflection that typifies the moral reasoning of NW White Europeans. It will be as if these less empathetic peoples were “deaf inside”.

Consequently, if we let more of these inwardly deaf races of people into the Anglosphere, they will remake their new nations in the image of their morally primitive homelands, and the morality that self-righteous White liberals take for granted as a foundation for their system of law and informal rules of social interaction will slowly, inexorably, disappear from the face of the earth, leaving their cherished constitutions worth no more than the memories evoked in old-timers who lived through the Dispossession Wars.

Because I’ve got somber news for liberals reading this: Don’t expect history to be on your side for much longer. In game theoretic match-ups, low-empathy ethnocentrism reproductively out-competes high-empathy humanitarianism. The fate of people who believe in leftoid equalism isn’t one world; it’s a world without them.

Read Full Post »

Proof that illegal aliens and assorted non-citizens have changed the outcome of US Presidential and Congressional elections comes from this study, which found

First use of representative sample to measure non-citizen voting in USA.

Some non-citizens cast votes in U.S. elections despite legal bans.

Non-citizens favor Democratic candidates over Republican candidates.

Non-citizen voting likely changed 2008 outcomes including Electoral College votes and the composition of Congress.

Voter photo-identification rules have limited effect on non-citizen participation.

In spite of substantial public controversy, very little reliable data exists concerning the frequency with which non-citizen immigrants participate in United States elections. Although such participation is a violation of election laws in most parts of the United States, enforcement depends principally on disclosure of citizenship status at the time of voter registration. This study examines participation rates by non-citizens using a nationally representative sample that includes non-citizen immigrants. We find that some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections. Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.

WOOMP DERE IT IS

Voter fraud is rampant and widespread in America, it almost entirely benefits Democreeps, and it likely altered the outcome of the 2008 Election, handing Gay Mulatto the Presidency (illegally, it turns out).

Now we can say with assurance that voter fraud affected the 2016 election, and that Trump won a much more decisive victory than his total population count would indicate, because millions of thecunt’s votes were cast by non-citizens. If voter fraud was bad enough in 2008 to change the outcome of the election, then you can bet it’s a lot worse today, eight years later during which time Democreeps and Cuckpublicans have done NOTHING to fix the problem and have, in fact, actively encouraged more non-citizens to vote by failing to pass any bill that would restrict the franchise to American citizens and make it more difficult for migrant squatters to vote a craven multikult-monger into office.

The Trumpening had better take no prisoners, because its opposite — The Cravening — has had no moral compunction disenfranchising heritage America. This is war.

Read Full Post »

banality

banality1b

banality2

banality2b

Via.

White Americans won’t put up with this bullshit much longer. The anti-White Equalist Left knows this, which is why they won’t relent on pushing for open borders and mass nonWhite colonization of America. If the leftoids can demographically displace Whites and thus disenfranchise them from the country their ancestors built, the Left won’t have to answer for their crimes against heritage America. They’ll simply crow victoriously behind an impenetrable phalanx of brown and black shock troops.

If the Left loses their precious open borders and mass nonWhite repopulation, they are staring down the business end of a noose. So don’t expect them to give up on their globohomo dream easily; their survival is tied up with your dispossession.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: