“This will not end well”

There are a couple of must-reads that were published this week. The first, by Kurt Schlichter, warns leftoids that their eagerness to silence dissent will strike back at them with a fury. Schlichter feels the passion of the shiv. You can tell because his article is sharp, hungry for leftoid vitals, and remorselessly allergic to the supine “to be sure”-isms which typify cuckservative mewlings.

But then, those concerns apparently aren’t worthy of attention. The news covers, day in and day out, some overeating foreigner and drug lord baby mama who Donald Trump was mean to a couple decades ago, but no reporter ever asks our guy about his problems. And they don’t merely ignore him. They come after him, jamming things down his throat like gender neutral bathrooms and murderous Muslim refugees and Wall Street scams that mean he gets about .001% interest on that money he saved just like the experts told him to. And he’s expected to just take it.

This will not end well.

It will end either with leftoid retreat or leftoid heads on stakes. The choice of fate is theirs.

***

The second article comes from the now-famous Publius Decius Mus, who whacks another two-by-four against the fiveheads of plush cucks like James Pethokoukis.

Whenever you find an article that begins with the title, “The Conservative Case” for or against something, lock your door, check your wallet, and grab your gun. You know what’s coming is an unadulterated sell-out of everything “conservatism” purports to hold dear.

***

Pethokoukis, like a good AEI-nik, would presumably dismiss such concerns as “the politics of envy” or some-such. True Conservatives™ don’t care about income inequality! The aggregate is what matters!

Matters to what? “The Economy?” Oh. Gains accruing to techies and hedge fundies are more than enough to offset losses everywhere else and that’s apparently good enough for Pethokoukis, who—like nearly all economists—bases his case on a narrow economic analysis that ignores the broader political sphere. Here we find another typical misinterpretation of Reagan. The Gipper’s successful policies proved that it’s all about incentives. All hail Homo economicus!

True, incentives matter. What do open borders and trade-giveaways incentivize blue collar workers in the heartland to do? Give up and shoot heroin?

***

Pethokoukis makes the highly unoriginal point that “Google, Facebook and Uber” show the continued dynamism of the U.S. economy. This is like John Kerry praising Apollo 11 in his acceptance speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Can’t think of anything to say? Moon shot! Oh, you’re talking about the economy? Google! Is any cliché more tired at this point? Google—actually Alphabet—has made a few people rich but otherwise has depressed high tech wages in Silicon Valley by its relentless importation, and advocacy for same, of foreign programmers who will work for less and transform neighborhoods through over-occupancy. All this to make porn searches more efficient. Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook is even more aggressive about screwing American workers—fwd.usa, anyone?—and his company even more useless. Uber promises to turn unemployed American workers, and untold foreigners, into cab drivers. But you hail them through a smartphone, so it’s high tech! These, and dozens more that Pethokoukis could have mentioned but mercifully did not, are far cries from the robber barons of old, who electrified the nation, linked us by rail, road, sea, and air, and built our greatest monuments. In the process, they employed millions, created wealth for tens of millions more, and improved standards of living for people on every rung of the ladder.

But for Pethokoukis, the true measure of national success is “translat[ing] entrepreneurial daring into wealth.” […] And what about the people who aren’t entrepreneurs and can’t be? Are they just losers? Does the wealth ever get to trickle down to them? That is, in the form of something other than lower iPhone prices?

***

Like all conservative Hegelians, Pethokoukis is endorsing, if implicitly, rule by the administrative state. “Truth” derives from scientific principle, which is published in academic “studies.” For their own good, the voters should not be allowed to contravene said “truth.” If the people don’t like current, academically endorsed immigration and trade policies, then the people are wrong. Which is manageable, as long as the political class successfully conspires to thwart their will. But when a “demagogue” comes along who threatens to implement the people’s will, that must be stopped!

***

The actual, political truth is that men are free “of all but moral law.” And there is no moral imperative for or against immigration or trade. If the people want them, they may lawfully enact them. If they don’t, they may restrict either, to the extent that their preferences in the moment dictate. Even if a consequence is that their economy contracts.

An economist will gasp at this heresy against his faith. But politics is greater and higher than economics. A failing economy might be a merely economic problem but a failing society is fundamentally a political problem.

***

The left rules out-of-bounds any discussion of the cultural or political effects of immigration as “racist,” and the conservatives go along. Hence they can only talk about immigration in economic terms, as if human beings were widgets.

Beautiful. This was a shiv aimed straight at the heart of Cheap Chalupas. I wonder how our favorite econo-autist is doing? He’s been on a “DAS RACISS” rearguard action lately, content to polish the knobs of various open borders leftoid freaks like Esssra Klein and Noah Smith. The Trumpening making him butthurt?

The rest of the article is even better than the excerpts I’ve quoted above. The closing sentence is absolutely killer. Read it in full and feel the force of a righteous revolution bearing down on the complacent, arrogant, smug equalist leftoid Hivemind and their cuckservative suck-up lackeys.

Read Full Post »

Are Dissident Thinkers Targeted By The US Government As Enemies Of The State?

Every intimation is a conspiracy until reality proves otherwise. And reality is rapidly proving the existence of a government-corporate globohomo alliance conspiracy against dissident thinkers (aka the alt-right). whorefinder is on it (again),

Look, I am hesitant to bring this up, but I plan on shutting down my blog/disappearing the whorefinder moniker in the near future.

Why? I’ll explain in my final blog post when the time comes, but basically it comes down to two things: (1) Comey’s July 5th press conference refusing to recommend that Hillary be indicted and (2) I finally watched the documentary on Edward Snowden and read up on just what the U.S. government is currently doing to its own citizens via violating their Fourth Amendment rights.

I will expand upon it on my future final blog post, but understand that we–as in the Alt-Right—are under heavier surveillance than you can imagine. And it is the Alt-Right—-and not ISIS, Al-Queda, BLM, Black Panthers, immigrants, or dirty politicians—who are the targets. And that is truly frightening.

This slow-moving purge is just the start, especially if President Trump’s coronation is shut down by a coup or an assassination. Hillary foolishly named the Alt-Right as her enemy to the national public; she was hoping to polarize us into an enemy, but she gave us a head start.

Even if President Trump gets into office, this Deep State will hammer him in a way that will make Nixon’s takedown seem positively pleasant. And even if President Trump is successful at curbing immigration and clamping down a bit, the apparatus (as Snowden has shown) is still in place and will outlast him.

I’ll let you all know when the blog is disappearing. Watch your back brothers, and MAGA.

I predicted a crackdown of thought criminals by the social media companies would intensify one month before the election, and that is what appears to be happening. Trump is a threat to the global world order, but more importantly Trump’s rise and victory would be an utter invalidation of the leftoid HiveEgo. The human ego is the strongest force in the universe and to think it would cede mental territory without a fight to the metadeath is the height of naivete. Shiv artistes should be ready to upgrade to a scythe at a moment’s notice.

Read Full Post »

The Purges Are Activated

Social media monopolies have begun large-scale purges of any and all effective pro-Trump voices using their platforms. CH was blocked two weeks ago from Twatter. Today, Ricky Vaughn got suspended (until further review post-election?). Apparently, Scott Adams was kicked off as well.

The night of the long knives is right on cue, one month before The Trumpening. Leftoids have lost the argument. Now they reach for the only weapon they have left: silencing.

Ah, but this is legal censorship. These are private companies, the leftoid sneers. Yes, I suppose it’s “legal”, which goes to show what a tenuous concept the legality of censorship can be when the information gateways are owned and controlled by six companies sharing an identical globalism worldview and shitlib equalism ideology.

Alternative information mediums such as Gab.ai are one answer to Hivemind directed purges of thought criminals. But that solution could takes years to develop viable competitors to the crumbling Narrative Megaphone. Another counterattack is depriving the tech oligarchs of their money; targeting celebrities and driving them away would eat a big hole in Twatter’s ad revenue. Faceborg and Spoogle likewise would suffer loss of power if consumers left them in droves. But getting there from here is a mountain of a challenge. Most attention whoring Americans couldn’t unplug from the Faceborg if a gun were to their heads.

What I think it’s going to take is an anti-trust lawsuit by President Trump’s DOJ to break up these media behemoths (including NPR) and breathe fresh air into their hermetically sealed shitlib echo chambers. And maybe a scandalous Wikileak or two on the private lives (and public machinations) of some of our gated community billionaire oligarchs.

Read Full Post »

Why A Decadent, Corrupt Elite Attracts So Many Gay Men

Reader whorefinder zeroes in on the reason why late-stage ruling elites mired in corruption and decadence are coincidentally so freaking gay.

Gays are defective men, and their effeminacy leads them to value and excel in very female traits. What’s more, gays excel past women in these traits because their retained testosterone naturally makes them more competitive than women. Gays like careers where licentiousness, flashiness, graft, catfighitng and backroom politics rule the day, and not ones where team work, tangible-goal meeting, merit-based advancement and self-sacrifice are valued.

Politics in decadent cultures is all about social manipulation and not about accomplishment. In non-decadent cultures, politicians assess which general conquered effectively; whether the police are keeping crime down. In decadent cultures, politicians assess whether they will get a payoff for favoring a certain bill; whether they can make another rival look bad; and whether they can get away with it.

Hence gays will excel in a decadent political climate. Hence why D.C.’s politicians and power players are very fag-heavy.

Hadrian was the exception rape!

A great insight to which I would only add that low T heterosexual men also excel in decadent political climates marked by constant elite infighting. The same female instincts that motivate gay men appear in abundance in the low T man as well.

The solution to American decline is…. more T. Higher testosterone, whether exogenously administered or included as an intrinsic part of the shitlord package. Trump is a virile man with the visage and slash and burn rhetorical skillset of a shitlord. If anyone can un-gay DC, and America at large, it’s Trump.

***

Related, a study of people’s natural feelings of “homophobia” — or what should more precisely be termed homoaedia (“disgust for homosexuals”) — found that it’s an emotional immune system response to the often-correct presumption that gay men are untrustworthy, disloyal, and unreliable when the group needs to be defended against outside threats.

Perception of Gay Men as Defectors and Commitment to Group Defense Predict Aggressive Homophobia

Homophobia encompasses a variety of attitudes and behaviors with distinct causal paths. We focus on aggressive homophobia, a propensity to feel anger and express aggression toward gay men. We investigated the conjecture that homosexual males might be seen, in recent Western cultures, as defectors from collective group defense. We predicted that consistent with a functional motive to punish and deter free riding, the perception of gay men as defectors would motivate aggression toward gay men. We also predicted that individuals with greater commitment to group defense might show more aggressive homophobia (as these individuals have more to lose from the defection than individuals who are not committed to group defense). Study 1 showed that aggressive homophobia correlated positively with the tendency to implicitly associate gay men with defection from group defense. Study 2 showed that a tendency to punish homosexual males for a theft correlated positively with commitment to group defense. The findings suggest that coalitional psychology might contribute to explaining the existence and quality of certain kinds of social stigma.

The part I bolded is interesting from a post-America vantage point. Very homophilic urban shitlibs — masculine careerist shrikes and low T effete hipster men — have, to borrow a Sailer phrase, leap-frogging loyalties to people and races far beyond their neighbors and racial kin. This remote defense of genetically distant groups is perfect for liberals who prefer to signal their virtue rather than act according to their claimed virtues (by, say, raising their family in the ghetto). The shitlib thus lacks the instinct for in-group defense, and when he is roused to group-defense does so for the benefit of outgroups, and often for extremely antagonistic outgroups. This muted if not altogether missing disposition to ingroup defense is reflected in the typical shitlib’s nonchalance toward the disease and disloyalty threats that homosexuals present to the group.

In other words, the same reason shitlibs don’t much get worked up over elite betrayals and the demographic destruction of White America explains why they don’t feel much concern about homosexual subversion and defection. It’s stunted shitlib amygdalas all the way down.

On this topic of justifiable disgust, I frequently come across assertions by shitlib sociologists that disgust per se leads to the ostracism and “dehumanization” of homosexuals, minorities, women, etc ad nauseam, and that if people just stopped feeling disgusted the tikkun olam utopia would be achieved. But this claim always struck me as an ass-backwards rationalizing of a studiously manicured false leftoid equalist worldview.

Disgust is not itself a stimulus; disgust is the emotional reaction to a negative stimulus. The leftoid inversion of this reality presents hilarious logic traps when examined critically by analogy. Dog shit serves as a useful mindgunk cleanser. Does our natural disgust at the sight of dog shit “dehumanize” and “other” the shit, or is our disgust a reasonable reaction to the smell and appearance and disease-carrying threat of dog shit? Naturally, the latter. We evolved the disgust response to protect against curious ingestion of dog shit or playfully smearing our faces with dog shit.

The same is true of homosexuals. People, especially those enmeshed in strong local communities, know instinctively that homosexuals are disease and disloyalty vectors, and they react with the appropriate and natural feeling of disgust when flamboyant gay homosexuals attack their senses. It’s why Kaine has triggered so many disgust reflexes; physiognomy is real and gaypedoface physiognomy is about as disgusting to normal people as a toadstool sandwich with arsenic sauce. Or Michelle Obama’s traps.

***

The contrarian asks, “If disgust is so useful, why did evolution select for shitlibs with high disgust thresholds?” My answer is that disgust inhibition is probably associated with increased creativity. If there was an environment in the past that greatly rewarded creative people, then that could, generations later, result in a larger proportion of the population suffering from an underdeveloped insula region of the brain (where disgust is manufactured). But the pendulum always swings back; our current petri dish culture of shitty aesthetics and shitlib eagerness to wallow in filth long ago reached the point of diminishing creativity returns. Now that the leftoid filth is threatening to swallow us up and destroy everything our ancestors worked to create, evolution will strongly select for the re-emergence of a shitlord phenotype/genotype to bring balance to the force.

But if the reproductive and cultural selection pressures for a Shitlord Ascendance are too slow or weak, then we will run out of time to wash away the grime. System failure will have to proceed if a truthnbeauty rebirth can happen.

Read Full Post »

The Gay Mulatto’s Terrorism False Equivalence

The gay mulatto (his stature now so diminished I can’t even merit capitalizing his insulting but truthful nickname) was asked by a doting reporter to patiently explain to benighted White Americans why he refuses to say the phrase “islamic terrorism”. He replied, paraphrasing, “We shouldn’t indict all the members of a religion. I’m a Christian…”

— yes he really said that–

“…and I think Christians wouldn’t like it if every time there was a terror attack by a Christian I got up here and blamed Christian terrorism.”

There is no end to the ways that this filthy disingenuous lying scumbag faggot mulatto — this spiteful white-hating muslimist creature — besmirches the highest office in the land by his occupancy. The wrongness of his statement is glaringly evident. First, there’s the intrinsic innumeracy of lawyerly shitlibs like obama whose snark-addled brains are incapable of understanding, or unwilling to acknowledge, socially relevant mathematical concepts like population ratios.

FACT: As a share of the US population, and for that matter of the world population, the number of terror attacks committed by muslims FAR EXCEEDS terror attacks committed by members of another faith.

Second, there’s the stated or implied motivation of the terrorists. In nearly EVERY muslim terror attack, the attackers themselves, or their surrogates in goat-fucking country, claimed Allah and Islam as their inspiration.

FACT: In close to NONE of the non-muslim terror attacks, the few that there were, in the US and Europe over the last century have the attackers claimed to be Christian warriors smiting the infidels for God and Jesus. Even abortion clinic bombers (whose victim count is paltry next to muslim terrorism) who claimed to be guided by God targeted the source of their grievance instead of random innocents going about their days.

Third, terrorist attacks are only the tip of the vice-berg when the motivation is islam. For every terrorist there are ten family members who privately aided him, supported him, or ignored his activities.

FACT: There is a huge number of muslims throughout the US and Europe who approve of the institution of sharia law and privately support terrorist motives. This “complicit majority” is nowhere found among Christians, who immediately and unwaveringly align in unison against any one of their own who commits an attack in the name of Christianity.

So we’ve got to listen to the gay mulatto lie through his teeth about why he won’t use the phrase “islamic terrorism” when the truth is that he has an emotional affinity for islam and a lifelong resentment of White Christian culture, and these feelings of his motivate him to falsely conflate all-too-common murderous known wolf muslims perpetrating their evil in the name of allah with rare lone wolf White attackers who happen to be Christian.

When the gay mulatto is out of office it will be every shiv-right knight’s duty to drag his reputation through the mud until the day when his name becomes a bad word White parents caution their children against saying out loud.

Read Full Post »

Was The Trump-Clinton Debate Rigged Against Trump?

Evidence mounts that there was a coordinated effort between thecunt and the moderator Lester Holt to subvert the debate.

Watch this video. (((YouTube pulled it))) It looks like thecunt was signaling to Holt at advantageous moments to give her a chance at a direct rebuttal, after which followed what sounded like scripted responses from thecunt.

The media and thecunt colluding to rig the debate against Trump and undermine faith in the democratic process to boot? SAY IT AIN’T SO.

The Fourth Estate is now the Fifth Column, actively aiding and abetting traitorous enemies within to suppress the nationalist will of the people. Not hyperbole. We’re really there. A sociopathic man-hating cunt and vile media shills acting as propaganda arms for the ruling class are the demonic face of a globohomo alliance that ordinary Americans are beginning to see clearly. When the people fully wake, it’ll be war.

Read Full Post »

Anatomy Of A Failed Killshot

Hillary Clinton’s (aka thecunt’s) GayMillennial staffers found a Taco Belle surrogate who could putatively bolster the Dems “war on women” trope against Trump and the Deplorables.

Alicia Machado, a Venezuelan import and former Miss Universe, claimed that in 1996 Trump had “fat-shamed” her for putting on 60 pounds in nine months (she alleges that he called her “Miss Piggy”) and consequently tarnishing the Miss Universe brand. Somehow, thecunt figured that this 20-year-old he said-she said soap opera would play well with the 2016 obese, gynocentric American electorate. She may have calculated correctly if she had had her “killshot” properly vetted before going public with this tactic, because the news about Miss Machado since her hugbox office debut has been nothing but LOLs and TOP KEKs.

This is how a killshot misfires:

-Parade a Woman of Color in front of studio audiences filled with manlets and bitter old cat ladies, to whom the WOC will claim (while reading from a Clinton-authorized script) that Trump insulted her for getting fat 20 years ago (a charge which, if true, is perfectly reasonable given that the Miss Universe title is ALL ABOUT LOOKING HOT AND SEXY….if you can’t push away from the table, don’t sign up for a beauty contest).

-Recline in your tactical genius and virtue signaling feels as you wait for your poll numbers to skyrocket.

-Oops, what’s that? A few intrepid shitlord journalists discover that Miss Machado was the alleged getaway driver from a murder scene in 1998 in Venezuela, that she had threatened the judge’s life after her boyfriend was indicted for attempted murder, and…it gets juicier…she was a hardcore porn star and the baby momma to a notorious Mexican drug cartel kingpin.

-MISFIRE. Go back to collapsing in a heap in 78 degree weather and being carried limp into a van by a detail of Secret Service agents who secretly despise you. The Parkinson’s is really kicking in now, and the untainted Diversitopia surrogates are in short supply. Time’s a-wasting!

A Sailer commenter weaves together the presumed Dem strategy and how it backfired so hilariously (and yet predictably),

I hope Trump, his campaign and supporters will jump all over this and help it to blow up in Clinton’s face.

I mean, really: Trump could not have designed a more perfect case in point, for what Democrats do with immigration, than this woman. Hillary finds a repugnant alien from a Socialist hellhole, who obviously does not have the qualities we look for in a citizen, but who is ready to bring her Socialist country’s narcissistic sense of personal entitlement to all the riches of our country; said alien then proceeds to shill for the treasonous political elites who hooked her up with access to native whites’ social and financial capital, promising to vote against the idea that America and its people should come first; when we are not sufficiently obsequious in this process, they have the temerity to spit in our faces and call us racists.

This is obviously illustrative of our immigration problem in its entirety: we should thank Hillary for making our point for us, and publicize the fact everywhere. I think Trump could be almost as angry and hostile to Hillary as he wanted on this topic in the next debate, with excellent results. I keep hearing people say that Hillary is actually quite smart and has been seasoned by years of political maneuvering, and that Trump should beware her political acumen. That sounds like it should be true, but I keep concluding that, in fact, she and the rest of the Left have simply never faced real opposition. If one is willing to strike back, they have left themselves open to any number of devastating attacks.

A-fucking-men. The Clintons are the worst….perhaps the most evil politicians in American history. You don’t take down evil of the Clinton caliber by pussy-footing around and adhering to the cuckservative tenet of genteel political oratory. You go for the jugular. And thecunt has had her jugular exposed and throbbing invitingly for so long its a testament to the cowardice of our supposed opposition party that they haven’t drawn a rhetorical knife to it….until Trump showed up, then suddenly cuck knives were out on display, quivering for the blood of the Deplorables.

Trump (Twatter handle: @realdonaldtrump) should leverage thecunt’s misfire and turn the killshot back on her.

“Hillary loves open borders so much she wants to give citizenship to trashy third worlders like Alicia Machado, who threatened a judge’s life and allegedly drove the getaway car from a murder scene in her homeland Venezuela. Hillary obviously does not care about serving the interests of regular Americans who don’t get involved with murder plots and Mexican drug cartels.”

Boom drop the Pepe.

The question that remains is how thecunt’s campaign so badly vetted Machado? There are three explantions:

• Incompetence. Today’s Democrats are skilled in the art of snark but maybe not so much in the discipline of hard work.
• Indifference. thecunt knew but didn’t care, figuring the media would do its appointed job covering up for Machado’s past.
• Gullibility. thecunt and her supporters are so waddle-deep in their race creationist equalism religion that they truly believe all colored people are lights onto the world and unstained by original sin.

thecunt exploited a dumb, troubled woman for political gain, but that’s par for the course in Clintonworld. What’s funniest about this spectacle is how the Democrats can’t fucking BUY a halfway sympathetic Diversity token to stand in for substantive arguments; every one of these Current Year surrogates for the Democrat party platform has been a loser and a piece of shit. Which is unsurprising. The Confederacy of Deceivers will choke on the pile of human excrement they increasingly lean on to further their goal of subsuming America into the globalism borg.

Read Full Post »