Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Physiognomy Is Real’ Category

Spot The Slut

Did you know you can identify a slut without mind-reading?

One major tell is the infamous “thousand cock stare“.

Look at the photos of these five women of varying sexual experience.

spottheslut

Based on their physiognomies and expressions, can you guess which ones are chaste and which ones have all-access passes to the cock carousel? One of these women, incredibly, has permitted 150 cocks to rotor through her tunnel of love. (Which means more like 300 cocks, given the female self-report rule to double every crotch notch she admits to having accumulated.)

I’ll take my shot. From left to right:

Huge slut
Newbie slut
Avaricious has-been slut (the 150-cock count winner)
Dirty slut
Chaste girl

I base my evaluations on these indicators:

Left-most blonde woman in blue dress has that classic “over-happy” look that cock-addicted women put on to conceal emotional torment. She looks wound up. If you use your hand to cover up the lower half of her face, you can’t miss the aggression and anger in her eyes. And notice how she holds her hands; clasped and cupping her vagina area. With women, this is a subconscious revelation that her vagina is the center of her existence and she offers it up tenderly to the fertility gods, like she’s releasing a piece dove.

Second-from-left woman is black and fat. Hate to say it but those are two major slut tells. However, she has a soft, friendly face, marked by a natural sincere smile and open raised eyebrows. She might be a sassy ho or one of those rare down-home ladies who likes to snuggle and dream of starting a family. My guess is that she’s sluttier than average, but not by much. (She may also not have had many opportunities to collect cocks, because men will pass over fatties if thinner alternatives are available.)

The middle cougar in the red dress is my choice for Slut of the Group (SLOG). 150 cocks looks about right for her, based on her age, short hair, ruby red lipstick, slightly crazy eyes, and deeply cut dress displaying what’s left of the bounce and fullness of her cleavage. And if you look closely, you’ll see she has a masculine digit ratio. DTF! (but suppleness is running out, so act fast.)

The Puerto Rican chick second-from-right is, again, black, and all the data we have on the matter shows that black women are as a rule sluttier than women of other races. The neck tilt is a classic female submission gesture, presenting to the male for ravishment. But coy women with low Ns do this too, so it’s not definitive. However, her bangles indicate that she’s adventurous once you get her in the bedroom. And her manjaw is impressive, cutting a sharp precipice from chin to ear. Verdict: AY YI YI SLUT. (100+ cocks)

Redhead at the far right is the chaste girl. Modest dress, unassuming stance, little make-up or jewelry, and from what I can see no fingernail polish (or very faint understated polish). But the only features you really need to look at to tell she’s no slut are her eyes and smile, both of which exude a natural, unforced warmth. Her eyes especially betray an inner calmness and deep satisfaction. This is a woman with a one cock gaze of love.

.

.

Have you readers taken your Chateau-educated guess? Good. Cross-check your results with the actual slut numbers from the story about these women.

.

.

.

.

Let’s see how I did.

Blondie: 102 cocks

MARKETING consultant Hattie Isaacson, 38, from Watford, says her number put some men off, but not husband Paul. [ed: beta]

She says: “I first had sex when I was 16 and it was the start of a good few years of doing it regularly.

“When I was young and single I liked to play the field and have sex whenever I could.

“My active sex life did mean I picked up chlamydia five times. I was on the pill so I didn’t always use a condom, which was silly.

“I had friends with benefits for years and I slept with a lot of interesting people when I went travelling when I was 22. I’ve kept a log of every man I’ve ever slept with so I don’t forget any.

Eat, pray, slut for the pyrrhic win. One has to wonder about the mental health and fidelity risk of a woman who kept a log of all the logs she holed (so she “doesn’t forget any”). Her husband has to be either a supreme beta or a gives-no-fucks alpha with pieces on the side.

I’ll give my slut guess a “HIT” for this woman.

***

Blackie: 3 cocks

“The final guy I slept with is the father of my son.

“I knew him at school too and we’d always had a connection but never acted on it.

“I was 20, and the first time we slept together I got pregnant. It wasn’t planned so it caused a few problems and I am currently single.

“I’m proud that I’ve only slept with three people — most people my age have slept with far more.”

Three cocks is low for any woman in our Houellebecqian Western sexual market dystopia, but it’s particularly low for a black woman. She’s definitely defied sterotypes (if she’s telling the truth).

I vacillated coming to a slut judgment (sludgment?) about her, but ultimately was too harsh. I’ll give myself a “MISS”.

***

Cougar: 35 cocks

“Bringing up four children doesn’t leave much time for sex so for over a decade my sex life was virtually nil.

“I never cheated on my husband, but by the time we got divorced we were not having much sex.

“We got divorced when I was 33, and when I eventually started meeting new men, I loved feeling free again and was able to indulge myself for a while.

“I really enjoy male company and see nothing wrong with having an active sex life if you are safe doing it.

How much has abortion, condoms, the Pill, and penicillin altered the sexual market? Rhetorical.

“In many ways I am making up for lost time.

Women who say this are super easy. You’ll go to pound town on the first date.

“In fact, I would be happy to get my number up to over 50, I have no problem with that.

“Most men don’t ask me how many people I’ve slept with, but if they do I always tell them the truth and I’ve yet to have a bad response.

She dates needy betas with limited mate options.

“It has been a bit of a turn-on for some because they know I know what I’m doing, and I’m also not clingy afterwards.”

Sluts love to hamsterize their cock gobbling as a victory for experience over bedroom ineptitude, but the truth is that sex isn’t complicated. Leg spreading isn’t rocket science.

Ok, I was off on this woman, but to be fair, 35 cocks is still a lot of cock, and she admits she would’ve racked up a much higher cock count had she not had four children early in life, and then asserts that she would happily love to crest 50 cocks.

Nevertheless, she’s not the number one slut.

My score: MISS (on a temporal bias technicality)

***

Puerto Rican: 150 cocks

ALESHA, 30, and son Justin, four, live in Stockwell, South London.

Single mom. Get ready for a no muss, no fuss easy lay.

She says: “I lost my virginity aged 16 to a guy at school. Like most of my friends’ first experiences it was awkward, but a relief too.

“At 17, when I started going clubbing, I’d meet and sleep with a man most nights. Men are usually quite easy to persuade into having sex.

If you aren’t 200 pounds or look like Hillary Clinton.

“I wouldn’t say I was addicted, I just saw sleeping with someone as part of a night out. By 20 I’d slept with over 100 men.

“I don’t regret my encounters. I just had a high sex drive. At times I felt like a predator. I do think my number is pretty high but I see nothing wrong with it.

I called 100+ cocks for this woman, so I’m giving myself the HIT. And it sounds like at age 30 she’s not ready to slow down, so she could quickly hit 150, 200, or more cocks.

***

Redhead: 1 cock

FULL-TIME mum Lara Eventide, 35, lives in Uxbridge, Middlesex, with her husband of 11 years, Chad.

They have a son aged seven and a 20-month-old daughter.

Lara says: “I was in my mid-teens when I met Chad at high school. We were just friends for four months then, one summer night, we revealed our love for each other.

High school romances are often the deepest, strongest, and longest-lasting loves a woman will ever feel. Not all end happily, but all leave a permanent imprint on a woman’s psyche.

“We started dating just days after I finished school in 1999. I had kissed five boys before but Chad was the only one I fell head over heels for and he has been the only man I have ever shared any sexual experiences with.

“We first had sex shortly after starting dating. We were both 17 and it was really special.

I have counseled that it’s always better to have sex sooner rather than later, because the best long-term relationships start with a foundation of uncontrollable passion. The key, if you want to avoid getting hitched to a slut OR a prude, is to see evidence in those first delirious dates of your woman working hard to contain her sexual ardor for you if she doesn’t want to give her sex away too quickly.

My score: HIT

***

I got three hits and two misses, but my misses were not totally off the reservation. This score reflects my real world experience; I have pretty good slutdar, and have never completely whiffed by mistaking a hardcore slut for a chaste, magical White girl. All men should be able to identify sluts, because knowledge is power. The moar you know…

A tragicomic coda: Maybe as little as sixty years ago only the 1 cock redhead would be considered by the general public a chaste woman of good repute and marriage worthiness. Even 3 cocks would have been deemed the work of the devil. Now, of course, no one bats an eye if a woman rolls into marriage with a long trail of cock memories shadowing her. If anything, a trad-chad who objects to dating or marrying a modren woman with a triple digit cock count is shamed for perpetuating oppressive patriarchal double standards.

Read Full Post »

There are posts buried in the CH archives discussing the phenomenon of sexual polarity and its importance to relationship health. Masculine men match well with feminine women. Yin and yang. Quim and wang.

What about gender oddities like feminine men and masculine women? The Law of Sexual Polarity — or what some have called the Law of Gender Conservation — states that the masculine and feminine must balance out in any relationship, in whichever sex those essences are primarily contained. So that means feminine men match well with masculine women. And if you’ve seen the wedding photos of Jezebel manjaws and their shlubby, uptalking, no-T, chinless beta hubbies, you’ll respect the perspicacity of the Law of Gender Conservation.

Which brings us to John Scalzi. If you wonder why I shiv this magnificent mangina so hard, you need look no further than the reason for his internet fame: a craven, dorky, shitlib virtue signaling post on his inane Whatever blog that likened Whiteness to playing at the lowest difficulty setting on a video game.

This lumpy hypocritical doughgoon who lives in a 98% White town deserves every bit of contempt coming his way. He is the androgynous embodiment of everything that is physically and psychologically deformed in the White leftoid race.

With that as context, Scalzi’s marriage — which he loves to boast about on Twatter, always (naturally) casting himself in the egregiously self-deprecating role of the anhedonic willfully emasculated doofus beta bitchboy raising an empowered feminist daughter and licking the boots of his warrioress wife — is revealed to be the PERFECT example of the Law of Gender Conservation in action.

scalziandwife

CAPSLOCK HUSTLA nails this smug phaggot nerdo to the wall:

SCALZI PROVIDES EXAMPLE # AD INFINITUM FOR THE LAW OF GENDER CONSERVATION: IN EVERY COUPLE, ΣMASCULINITY = ΣFEMININITY.

Did he marry the love child of the Refrigerator and the Mountain? But for real…

EVERY

SINGLE

TIME

you find a quisling White mangina begging for acceptance into the Amanjaw Marcuntte man-hating club, there’s a she-ggoth glowering over him.

Cerebral scalzied is filth. His brand of contemptible cowardly virtue whoring self-neutering is emblematic of the shitlib mind rot that’s sweeping through the White West. It’s good to call him out as the pathetic whipped cur he is, putting not just him on notice, but any other impressionable Whitelings who may be tempted to comfortable prostration by his sickly siren call.

These degenerated freaks have only just begun to feel the crunch of the Fourth Turning grinding its gears into motion.

Read Full Post »

My oh my, the ¡SCIENCE! is sweet this week. I’ll never tire of ¡SCIENCE! (the preferred authority of libshits) fluffing my ego knob to an enthusiastic *preen*. SCIENCE is why I love assaulting HARHAR INBRED HILLBILLY liberal virtue masturbating snobs with the 100% TRUEFACT that the most inbred races in the world are the Semitics.

Now it is revealed by an unbiased AI that physiognomy — the facial features of a person as indicative of that person’s character — is real. A study used a machine learning algorithm (proto-AI) to determine if criminals could be identified by their faces from a random population sample, and the AI awkwardly noticed a very uncomfortable fact about human physiognomy.

We study, for the first time, automated inference on criminality based solely on still face images. Via supervised machine learning, we build four classifiers (logistic regression, KNN, SVM, CNN) using facial images of 1856 real persons controlled for race, gender, age and facial expressions, nearly half of whom were convicted criminals, for discriminating between criminals and non-criminals. All four classifiers perform consistently well and produce evidence for the validity of automated face-induced inference on criminality, despite the historical controversy surrounding the topic. Also, we find some discriminating structural features for predicting criminality, such as lip curvature, eye inner corner distance, and the so-called nose-mouth angle. Above all, the most important discovery of this research is that criminal and non-criminal face images populate two quite distinctive manifolds. The variation among criminal faces is significantly greater than that of the non-criminal faces. The two manifolds consisting of criminal and non-criminal faces appear to be concentric, with the non-criminal manifold lying in the kernel with a smaller span, exhibiting a law of normality for faces of non-criminals. In other words, the faces of general law-biding public have a greater degree of resemblance compared with the faces of criminals, or criminals have a higher degree of dissimilarity in facial appearance than normal people.

Fellow Chateau guests, another CH ugly truth is externally validated by scientific inquiry: You really can judge a book by its cover.

I’ve lived here there and everywhere, and I can tell you that if you allow your eyes to see what is in front of your nose, you will definitely achieve a honed sixth sense for which people, by look alone, have criminal designs. (For the black male teen physiognomy, your sixth sense for criminal disposition needn’t be very honed.)

Evolution gave us these pattern recognition modules in our brains as a helpful navigation tool through an often hostile world. Only urban White liberals weaned on finding self-worth in their SAT scores and inability to throw a ball like a man seem to think it shows class to metaphorically excise that useful pattern recognition module from their brains and loudly advertise their self-mutilation to the cheers of their intellectually corralled comrades.

To be more precise, White liberals PRETEND to lobotomize their noticing lobe. There’s a large chasm between the White liberal’s stated and revealed preferences. When real consequences to not noticing are possible, the GoodWhite liberal finds within herself the power of a hundred BadWhite racists.

PS I can’t wait for the inevitable SCIENCE which confirms the existence of the thousand cock stare and slut eye. Not to mention the thousand CUCK stare. You know it’s coming!

PPS While we’re on the subject of PHYSIOGNOMY IS REAL, here’s a study which found that GAYPEDOFACE is real.

Evidence is steadily accumulating to support a neurodevelopmental basis for pedophilia. This includes increased incidence of non-right-handedness, which is a result primarily of prenatal neural development and solidified very early in life. Minor physical anomalies (MPAs; superficial deviations from typical morphological development, such as un-detached earlobes) also develop only prenatally, suggesting them as another potential marker of atypical physiological development during the prenatal period among pedophiles.

This study administered the Waldrop Physical Anomaly Scale to assess the prevalence of MPAs in a clinical sample of men referred for assessment following a sexual assault, or another illegal or clinically significant sexual behavior.

Significant associations emerged between MPA indices and indicators of pedophilia, including penile responses to depictions of children, number of child victims, and possession of child pornography. Moreover, greater sexual attraction to children was associated with an elevated craniofacial-to-peripheral anomalies ratio. The overall sample demonstrated a greater number of MPAs relative to prior samples of individuals with schizophrenia as well as to healthy controls.

Paging Lindsay Graham…Sen. Graham to the courtesy phone please….

The ugly truths are coming fast and furious now. Leftoid equalism is not long for this world.

Read Full Post »

“The sexual market is the one market to rule them all” — CH

Whenever proposing big picture theories for ideological beliefs, I always refer to the sexual market and how the dynamics of reproductive fitness operating at the level of the hindbrain primarily influence higher order human interactions like social or political organization.

This came to mind while reading about (((Josh Marshall’s))) attack on the most un-hateful man on the internet, Steve Sailer.

(of course you’ll notice marshall never answered steve’s pinpoint charge against him, preferring instead to cry out in pain while flinging shit at steve, which is the wont of his evasive reptilian subspecies)

Anyhow, an astute Sailer commenter noted something about Josh Marshall that goes a long way to explaining his anti-Gentile bitterness.

Marshall’s bride looks like the result of some Semitic inbreeding program.

marshallwife
Lefties are always unhappy because of the women, by dint of they’re [sic] inherent dweebieness, they’re forced to be with.

All politics isn’t local. All politics is gonadal.

Male shitlibs generally are an effete bunch, and their masculine, ugly girlfriends and groace wives testify to that. A manlet stuck with an ugly woman will over the years build up a reservoir of caustic spite against masculine high T men and the feminine women who love them. Josh Marshall fits the stereotype perfectly. Many of his extended kin fit the stereotype perfectly.

In fact, the exceptions are so glaringly obvious that they prove the rule. The skype men who more closely resemble in face and physique the male Gentile aesthetic tend also to be less antagonistic toward Gentile culture and politics.

Executioner’s Summary: Physiognomy is creed.

***

plumpjack has a novel theory that connects vision quality with shitliberalism.

does poor vision predispose someone to liberal, immediate gratification-leaning politics? IOW, is there a link between actual vision acuity and future time-orientation?

where I grew up, very red area, and lots of hawk-eyed, self-sufficient folks. the coke-bottle lens-sporting folks were always in white collar-ish jobs, or on food stamps. now I live in one of the most shitlibby towns on the planet and I swear, I can barely find a single person who doesn’t wear glasses. I can glimpse through the side of their reality warping lenses and see just how totally fkd up their eyesight is. it’s scary.

it could also be that a person with poor vision feels more vulnerable and therefore favors gibs policies. or it could be that they literally and figuratively cannot see into the future.

this should be studied. (note: i apologize to any commenters here who wear coke bottle type glasses. no offense. I’m just raising the question.)

It’s absolutely true that liberals, especially the male of the species, are physically unimpressive in one or more ways compared to their shitlord brethren, and poor eyesight is a big tell of shitlibbery. A powerful correlation, but is it more than that, as plumpjack suggests? Adjusted for the White race, does poor vision directly alter feedback loops in the brain that dispose the liberal to prefer insta-feelz over grappling with the long-term consequences of their policies and governance?

Read Full Post »

I posted this on Gab, so consider this a blog repost. I’m shamelessly pilfering the idea from MPC contributors Cinco Jotas and Neophyte, because it’s funny and true and most importantly has real potential as a meme generator-slash-social science survey of generational decline in the American elite.

Cinco offers the Roosevelt clan as a case study in the atrophy of a family of great American men into low T cucks.

When I think of real American noblesse oblige, I think of a family like the Teddy Roosevelts, old-money American aristocracy who had power, wealth and status, but none-the-less did their duty at great cost. Read about Teddy Roosevelt, Jr.., the ultimate anti-cuck, who was in many ways more impressive than his father.

Neophyte supplies the photographic evidence of a generational shift in the Roosevelt family from shitlord physiognomy to neoteny/gaypedoface.

You can actually see the generational shift toward neoteny. It’s like some Animorphs type s**t. In case you ever doubted that ZOG is increasingly poisoning our water supply with estrogen:

Teddy Roosevelt Jr:

tr3

Teddy Roosevelt IV:

tr4

Teddy Roosevelt V:

tr5

And then it all f**king comes apart…

Ted IV, who started out so nobly, became an investment banker after Vietnam and now he’s a full-on cuckservative who supported Kasich in the primaries and feels that the Golden Don isn’t “right for the presidency or the GOP.”

And of course, his son, Ted Roosevelt V, is a 40-year-old, childless, Obama-fellating Democrat, faggoty, uber-SWPL hedge fund manager, who runs triathlons instead of serving in the military. He’s completely detached from ordinary people, a repulsively smug creature whose male ancestors would have found odious and unmanly. He is an avatar of our debased age and the utter dead-end of a noble line.

The degradation of America’s ruling class in form and function is so plain to see to anyone but the elite themselves. And that is why they will fall.

Trump will make America’s fortunate sons masculine and magnanimous again.

MAGA 2016

GALA 2016

thecunt 666

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: