Archive for the ‘Pretty Lies’ Category

The world’s fish-mouthed catladies are in a tizzy about “racial disharmony”. They just want everyone to get along, and if that means criminalizing White men, so be it.

Spot the missing White man.

The title of this post came via a news story from New Zealand, a country run by an angry shrew who is currently locking up White New Zealanders by the truckload for the crime of thinking bad thoughts. A reader summarizes:

In summary: A woman posted something about Muslims on Facebook, in reference to the Christchurch shooting. She deleted the post shortly afterwards, probably after calming down. State police screenshotted her post and have charged her with “inciting racial disharmony” and are refusing to reveal what the woman actually posted.

Bizarre. Police are literally trawling Facebook looking for white people to charge and prosecute for posting improper comments.

The NZ police sergeant is, naturally, a pursed-lipped woman.

Another reader adds,

The inquisition is under way. Government agents are breaking into people’s houses threatening and demanding that they conform to their views.

Welp, this is what happens when you leave women in charge of things. CONFORMISM ÜBER ALLES.

A third reader quips,

Multiculturalism is a such a runaway success that it requires a Big Brother police state to make it work.

From Ari Shekelstein,

in terms of musical harmony, i’d blame your jamming together of every note of every pitch until your society sounds like a sonic youth album, rather than the facebook post complaining about it.

Racial disharmony is the NORM when malicious elites force diversity on their White nations. But maybe that’s the point. Elites WANT the clash of civilizations. If they can’t have war abroad, they’ll have it at home. A reader,

sounds about right-
the leadership has the gambit of bringing in a sub-class to destroy the system-
leaders feed on war- and when they cannot have in international-
intra-national seems to fit them fine-

The best comment comes from Eis Augen,

Doesn’t incite racial disharmony:

1. Importing culturally unsuitable peoples

2. Murder

3. Rape

4. Assault

5. Ignoring crime waves stemming from 1-4

Incites racial disharmony:

1. Noticing

Perfect shiv.

Shitlibs like NZ’s Prime Catlady are world class liars and despots. Racial disharmony doesn’t need to be “incited”; it’s a naturally emergent property of being human. That’s why so much energy and Orwellian doublethink is deployed to tamp down that natural immune response of native Whites to their countries being overrun by foreigners. The Surveillance State wasn’t invented to track moslem radicals after 9/11; it was invented to track YOU, White people, in your own fucking countries!

The funny thing is, Whites as a race (in contrast to most other races) are generally good-natured toward foreigners and hold no hate for them. It’s when all this Forced Diversity is within spitting distance of Whites that it becomes easier to harbor ill will toward them as they set about destroying all that you hold dear, by wont of their natures. Familiarity breeds White identity politics. Our short-sighted and/or malevolent overlords are creating the very problem they claim to want to prevent.

Racial disharmony is the natural state of humans. Racial harmony is the odd, unstable exception. That’s why Whites are spending so much money and spiritual energy trying to tamp down racial disharmony and to force racial harmony into a state of artificial permanence. It is doomed to fail, spectacularly if all the pressure release valves are sealed tight.

Now of course, racial disharmony can be incited — or more precisely, amplified — by bone-headed policies like open borders to the third world. And racial harmony can be coaxed by smart policies that limit the influx of Diversity and allow the majority to nurture a congenial paternalism toward the small minority of aliens. But all we have now is the former, and none of the latter. This is evil, or profoundly stupid. Either way, locking up White thought criminals is certainly fated to make the problem worse.

PS “Christchurch Revisited“.

The replacement is real, but the culprits are not the immigrants. It’s people who organise the replacement, who bomb Muslim lands to create living hell, who bring the refugees to Europe (and its extension in Australia-NZ), who indoctrinate against ‘xenophobia’ instead of denouncing greed.

PPS I have seen the face of evil in this UN Population Division report.

United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.

Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.

So transparently Globohomo. Our depraved elites want to supplement our aging Western White populations with nonWhite migrants. Check out the annex tables for the details of their plan.

PPPS Christians living in a moslem country are 143 times more likely to be killed by a moslem than moslems living in a Christian country are to be killed by a Christian. Sorry, not sorry, shitlibs, the numbers don’t lie!

PPPPS I support declaring all of the internet a public utility, free from the whims of big tech leftoids to censor whomever they don’t like.

PPPPPS Holy shit, is it happening?!

Mark Meadows: US ambassadors conspired with DOJ to take down Trump
Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., hinted Monday the coming release of documents that will “show” U.S. ambassadors conspired with the FBI and the Justice Department to harm President Trump.

“It’s additional information that is coming out that will show not only was there no collusion, but there was a coordinated effort to take this president down,” Meadows told Fox News’ Sean Hannity. “We talk about the ‘Deep State.’ There are players now, even ambassadors, that are sitting ambassadors that were involved in part of this with the FBI-DOJ.”

I pray every day for this happening. I pray for the Trump Rampage.

Read Full Post »

Reader wow, just wow says,

If you read nothing else today, read this.

We’re living within a horrifying dystopia.

That’s no hyperbole. The following confessionals will both break your heart and fill it with a rage that could fuel a thousand cleansing fires. An excerpt:

In Their Own Words: Parents of Kids Who Think They Are Trans Speak Out


My daughter, at age fourteen, spontaneously decided that she is actually a male. After suffering multiple traumatic events in her life and spending a large amount of time on the internet, she announced that she was “trans.” Her personality changed almost overnight, and she went from being a sweet, loving girl to a foul-mouthed, hateful “pansexual male.” At first, I thought she was just going through a phase. But the more I tried to reason with her, the more she dug her heels in. Around this time, she was diagnosed with ADHD, depression, and anxiety. But mental health professionals seemed mainly interested in helping her process her new identity as a male and convincing me to accept the notion that my daughter is actually my son.

At age sixteen, my daughter ran away and reported to the Department of Child Services that she felt unsafe living with me because I refused to refer to her using male pronouns or her chosen male name. Although the Department investigated and found she was well cared for, they forced me to meet with a trans-identified person to “educate” me on these issues. Soon after, without my knowledge, a pediatric endocrinologist taught my daughter—a minor—to inject herself with testosterone. My daughter then ran away to Oregon where state law allowed her—at the age of seventeen, without my knowledge or consent—to change her name and legal gender in court, and to undergo a double mastectomy and a radical hysterectomy.

My once beautiful daughter is now nineteen years old, homeless, bearded, in extreme poverty, sterilized, not receiving mental health services, extremely mentally ill, and planning a radial forearm phalloplasty (a surgical procedure that removes part of her arm to construct a fake penis).

The level of heartbreak and rage I am experiencing, as a mother, is indescribable. Why does Oregon law allow children to make life-altering medical decisions? As a society, we are rightly outraged about “female circumcision.” Why are doctors, who took an oath to first do no harm, allowed to sterilize and surgically mutilate mentally ill, delusional children?

When Lies & Ugliness overthrow Truth & Beauty, there is no limit to the depraved evil that is capable of being unleashed.

Having to watch these adults enable my daughter to do this with no medical science to back it up is a scenario that I never dreamed any parent would have to face, at least not in the United States. But this is our reality now—a reality that the mainstream media won’t touch.

All these trannyfreak cheerleaders and advocates and enablers and witch doctors should be arrested and tried for child endangerment and gross medical malpractice. End of discussion.

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

This is what shitlibs think of themselves when their self-perception algorithm is set to 100% Fantasy Fuel.

Shitlib phenotype reality:

PA comments,

It’s an interesting window into the lib-male’s soul. His antagonists, who represent MAGA men, aren’t evil-looking, scary or ridiculous. They are sad and weak looking.

Yet the lib’s self-image is that of the aggressor, or at least a hard-puncher in that single frame.

Doesn’t feel heroic to me. But the lib is clearly in throes of self-idealizing heroism when he verbally (it’s always about being so smart!) abuses defeated men.

Male shitlibs are like that version of George Costanza in the jerkstore episode. He’s always thinking of comebacks after the moment has passed, but finally has one and it lands with a thud. His self-satisfaction is immediately deflated.

Anyhow, PA has got it right. Shitlibs are into humiliation porn. They have a sadistic urge to cruelly humiliate weaker enemies, while stronger enemies elicit from the shitlib either deranged psychotic breaks or instant submission and pleas for mercy.

Where did this comic come from? Aquinas quips:

A [special person] fappatorium

PS Decent article about “conservative democracy”.

Read Full Post »

The latest Fake Stat currently rubbing shitlib clits raw is this [very special study] purporting to prove that hate crimes are far more prevalent than are hate hoaxes:

Here go shitlibs again, with their inverted logic (a hate hoax means hate crimes are real!) playing fast and loose with data they comprehend just enough to obfuscate and twist into misleading headlines, hoping to pull a fast one on a short attention span public who still thinks the $PLC isn’t an anti-White hate organization.

A Sailer commenter called out this bullshit and tiresome leftoid tactic,

Just like that, the latest NYT “factoid” joins the “10% of Americans are gay” and “1 in 4 women are raped” and the rest of the BS everyone believes because they “read it somewhere.”

The online hoax lists show hundreds of examples.
And many–if not most–of the “real” ones are fakes.

The category error is definitional. There are reported hate crimes which were never investigated, there are investigated but unsolved hate crime reports, and there are proven and prosecuted hate crimes. “Hate crimes in the US (2016-2018): 21,000” doesn’t tell us much. 21,000 hate crimes could mean 21,000 reported hate crime hoaxes that were never disproven by a full police investigation. And it could mean 21,000 black-on-white hate crimes.

I’ll crib from International Jew, who came up with an apt analogy for this tedious data-sodomizing legerdemain by shitlibs,

When it comes to alleged hate crimes, the interesting question is: what percent of the thoroughly investigated ones were real?

You’d get a high “real” percent for UFOs to, if you compared total alleged sightings to the number that were investigated and debunked.

Maybe I’m slightly biased by my politics in this, but right now I can think of more hate hoaxes than I can recall real hate crimes.

Going down the shabbos hole to the source of the Fake Stat above, we find something very…predictable.

Brian Levin, the director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University in San Bernardino, who has been tracking staged and real hate crimes, counted 49 fake reports between 2016 and 2018. In the same time, Levin told Quartz, there were about 21,000 hate crimes. That makes the percentage of falsely reported attacks 0.2% of all hate crimes. (The FBI received 13,000 hate crime reports in 2016 and 2017, according to its latest data.)

While Levin concedes that his data collection methodology has limitations—he and his team rely on media reports—it is indicative of how rare it is for a hate crime to be made up.

A [special person] consulted an industry run by [special people] for tautological “evidence” that would support a [special narrative].

“It was in the media, so it must be true!”

Good lord, what a load of libfuckery.

More on Brian Levin,

The one-man-band behind the garbage called “research” in that article is Brian Levin.

You can find plenty about him online. Here is an example:


Andy Ngo has more: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo



This Levin character sounds like someone who really has a stick up his ass about Christian America.

One more great comment, from Almost Missouri:

Mikel Jollett’s “hate crime” numbers are really Annalisa Merelli’s numbers, which are really Brian Levin’s numbers, which are basically meaningless tautologies invented by Brian for the purpose of perpetuating his career.

OTOH, Merelli does write that “The FBI received 13,000 hate crime reports in 2016 and 2017”, which is true, in the sense that over two years the FBI received about that number of “reports”. But it turns out the FBI stats aren’t much better than SPLC alum Levin’s fake numbers.

The FBI—or other DoJ arm—could just total up the number of hate crime convictions in a year and have a pretty robust, verifiable and traceable number. But they don’t do this. Instead they total up “reports”, which are not convictions. They are just reports: someone (example: Jussie Smollett) told a law enforcement officer that a hate crime happened, and someone at the law enforcement agency (and by law that person has to be a designated “expert” on “hate crimes”, giving said “expert” a vested interest in justifying their “expertise” with large numbers of reports) passes a few general specs about the allegation on to the FBI, who tally it up for the big report. If the allegation is never confirmed, or if it turns out to be false, does the FBI subtract the number back out? Maybe, maybe not. Apparently certainly not if it takes into the next reporting period to establish the falsehood of the allegation, since the FBI does not issue revised statistics.

Then there is the fact that the definitions of “hate crime” are extremely loose. The perp, if they even have one, does not need to be charged with a hate crime for it to count as a “hate crime” for the FBI’s statistical purposes. For example, if the alleged victim is a member of the NAACP, the allegation is automatically a “hate crime” if the “hate crime” “expert” so designates it.

Unsurprisingly , the definitions and examples in the official docs are written to maximize culpability of whites. In spite of this, whites still manage to under-perform compared to their share of the population. No prizes for guessing which race most over-performs compared to their share of the population, despite the fact that this category of crime was tailor made to boost their victimhood and camouflage their criminality.

Finally, there seems to be no way to trace the FBI’s Hate Crime statistics back to the actual events that underlie them short of submitting thousands of FOIA requests per year, which still may not suffice. So there is no objective, independent way to verify the FBI’s “Hate Crime” stats.

Despite the existence of actual, verifiable numbers of hate crime convictions existing, the FBI/DoJ ignores that in favor of an opaque, unverifiable, easily distorted process that maximizes “hate crime” claims with no connection to actual convictions. Lazy and dishonest journalists such as Jollett and Merelli bandy these fake stats about with gay abandon. Thus does the public-private partnership Fake News Juggernaut roll on.

Steve Sailer — a better man than Mikel Jollett or Brian Levin could ever hope to be — ran the real numbers and came up with a more accurate ratio of real hate crimes to hate hoax crimes.

Hoaxes as elaborate as the Empire TV star’s are rare, but it’s hardly uncommon for, say, the perpetrator to turn out to be nonwhite, or the act, such as posting a flyer mentioning “It’s okay to be white,” to be not (yet, at least) a crime, or for the motives to be murkier than you’d imagine from reading Southern Poverty Law Center fund-raising junk mail.


But what percentage of these press allegations have since been validated?

The methodological issue is, how do we keep advocates from memory-holing contrary data?

My solution is to use The New York Times’ own “This Week in Hate” columns. I let the pinnacle of Establishment respectability take their best shot, curating their own list of hate crimes from across the country. I then evaluate how The New York Times did.


For the purposes of this essay, I analyzed all 21 incidents in the second (12/6/16) and third (12/13/16) weeks of “This Week in Hate,” looking for pro and con evidence that has accumulated in the 26 months since on the validity of the NYT’s accounts. (I skipped the first week, assuming it was better to let the NYT get into its stride. I encourage other researchers to check out the rest of “This Week in Hate,” which finally petered out in July 2017.)

How many of the 21 incidents have resulted in hate-crime convictions? How many have been shown to be a complete hoax? How many are unconfirmed by the justice system but seem plausible? How many unconfirmed occurrences are dubious?


As I count them, of the 21 incidents carefully curated by the NYTto demonstrate that white Trumpists are waging a war of hate on the true Americans:

Two are more or less proven.

Five are unproven but more likely than not.

Seven are unproven and more unlikely than not.

And seven are disproven.

So, the nation’s Newspaper of Record got at least an average of one out of three of its “This Week in Hate” stories right. On the other hand, the facts in another one out of three cases undermine the NYT’s Narrative.

For the Times to be right on merely a simple majority (11 of 21) of its handpicked stories of white Trump criminality, four of the seven unlikely incidents would have to turn out to be true.

Therefore, the Times probably failed to reach even 50 percent accuracy.

Brutal debunking. FATALITY

Andy Ngo likewise concludes that there is an epidemic of (mostly anti-White blood libeling) hate hoaxes:

PS There’s no such thing as “hate speech”. There is only free speech. And there is no such thing as “hate crime”. There is crime. We shouldn’t prosecute thoughts. We should prosecute actions. End the “hate crime” farce now.

Read Full Post »

Finland tried a UBI experiment in 2016, Two years in, the preliminary results are:

Employment: unchanged
Feelz: improved


UBI doesn’t work in Finland, one of the most homogeneous White nations on earth.

It did improve participants’ feelings, though.

If Finland couldn’t squeeze any tangible benefit from UBI, just imagine how badly it would fail in a toilet-swirling Diversitopia like America.

PS Finnish girls have been pozzed for a long time. More on that in a future post.

Read Full Post »

There were some great comments on the post about White female public schoolteachers being unable or unwilling to admit deep-seated racial differences among their students.

aidanmaclear writes,

I was once on the track to become a teacher, and the entire purpose of the field of ‘educational studies’ is to eliminate the race gap. There is literally nothing else. It is now the absolute purpose of education in this country. The only people who could actually make it through this indoctrination camp are sick, twisted true believers. I will not let my progeny within a hundred yards of an educational facility.

Public schoolteachers are winnowed from a larger pool of aspirants through a hyper-pozzed selection process, so what you’re getting are the women most devoted to race creationism and kumbaya virtue signaling.

Bucky, with the short and sweet explanation,

have you ever seen a woman admit it when she’s wrong? No, me neither…which explains the teacher thing

Dirtnapninja, on women and the irresistible lure of status whoring,

People will cling to status over happiness. These white chicks are terribly unhappy, but they will cling to their delusions because to relinquish them will mean a decline in status.

Chronopolis makes an astute point about White female shitlib teachers,

These shitlib women [schoolteachers] come in with varying degrees of idealism, but all of that rapidly evaporates after a year or so. It would indeed be a FASCINATING psychology study to follow this arc. It has been by experience that not a single one of them harbors any doubts about the racial factor, both negatively toward blacks, positively toward Whites, and sideways in the case of the grab-bag of asians and hispanics. These are, by in large, talented intelligent women whose entire view of the world crashes down around them in the space of a year – the cognitive dissonance between the raging jungle reality and their Diane Fossey fantasies leads most to quit within a few short years, as CH pointed out. They go to teach in a respectable district, they quit altogether (one I know is an exec at Pokemon USA), or they join somewhere – and this is tellingly pathological – where they are only exposed to Goodblacks: library outreaches, political NGOs and the like.

I call that last bit “putting up token insistence”. The White female teachers who have been exposed to the jungle, will quit and rebound from the horrible experience in a number of ways, but the most telling way, as Chronopolis noted, is by taking a job at a “diversity & inclusion” shitlib hothouse which is known to have Goodblacks on staff. These token “articulate blacks” assuage the White female guilt for harboring illicit racial thoughts from her years teaching in the desegregated public schools.

More crucially, the White female can point to these Goodblacks as “proof” that blacks are just like Whites, and the only thing holding back the untalented 90th is discrimination and lack of school funding. Insisting that the exception is the rule is a specialty of White femaledom. The egos of these women are so large, gluttonous, and fragile, that they will have a pathological need to seek out and ingratiate themselves to Goodblacks just to prop up their embattled religious belief in race equalism.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: