Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Pretty Lies’ Category

The gay mulatto (his stature now so diminished I can’t even merit capitalizing his insulting but truthful nickname) was asked by a doting reporter to patiently explain to benighted White Americans why he refuses to say the phrase “islamic terrorism”. He replied, paraphrasing, “We shouldn’t indict all the members of a religion. I’m a Christian…”

— yes he really said that–

“…and I think Christians wouldn’t like it if every time there was a terror attack by a Christian I got up here and blamed Christian terrorism.”

There is no end to the ways that this filthy disingenuous lying scumbag faggot mulatto — this spiteful white-hating muslimist creature — besmirches the highest office in the land by his occupancy. The wrongness of his statement is glaringly evident. First, there’s the intrinsic innumeracy of lawyerly shitlibs like obama whose snark-addled brains are incapable of understanding, or unwilling to acknowledge, socially relevant mathematical concepts like population ratios.

FACT: As a share of the US population, and for that matter of the world population, the number of terror attacks committed by muslims FAR EXCEEDS terror attacks committed by members of another faith.

Second, there’s the stated or implied motivation of the terrorists. In nearly EVERY muslim terror attack, the attackers themselves, or their surrogates in goat-fucking country, claimed Allah and Islam as their inspiration.

FACT: In close to NONE of the non-muslim terror attacks, the few that there were, in the US and Europe over the last century have the attackers claimed to be Christian warriors smiting the infidels for God and Jesus. Even abortion clinic bombers (whose victim count is paltry next to muslim terrorism) who claimed to be guided by God targeted the source of their grievance instead of random innocents going about their days.

Third, terrorist attacks are only the tip of the vice-berg when the motivation is islam. For every terrorist there are ten family members who privately aided him, supported him, or ignored his activities.

FACT: There is a huge number of muslims throughout the US and Europe who approve of the institution of sharia law and privately support terrorist motives. This “complicit majority” is nowhere found among Christians, who immediately and unwaveringly align in unison against any one of their own who commits an attack in the name of Christianity.

So we’ve got to listen to the gay mulatto lie through his teeth about why he won’t use the phrase “islamic terrorism” when the truth is that he has an emotional affinity for islam and a lifelong resentment of White Christian culture, and these feelings of his motivate him to falsely conflate all-too-common murderous known wolf muslims perpetrating their evil in the name of allah with rare lone wolf White attackers who happen to be Christian.

When the gay mulatto is out of office it will be every shiv-right knight’s duty to drag his reputation through the mud until the day when his name becomes a bad word White parents caution their children against saying out loud.

Read Full Post »

Evidence mounts that there was a coordinated effort between thecunt and the moderator Lester Holt to subvert the debate.

Watch this video. (((YouTube pulled it))) It looks like thecunt was signaling to Holt at advantageous moments to give her a chance at a direct rebuttal, after which followed what sounded like scripted responses from thecunt.

The media and thecunt colluding to rig the debate against Trump and undermine faith in the democratic process to boot? SAY IT AIN’T SO.

The Fourth Estate is now the Fifth Column, actively aiding and abetting traitorous enemies within to suppress the nationalist will of the people. Not hyperbole. We’re really there. A sociopathic man-hating cunt and vile media shills acting as propaganda arms for the ruling class are the demonic face of a globohomo alliance that ordinary Americans are beginning to see clearly. When the people fully wake, it’ll be war.

Read Full Post »

Confirming what I’ve long suspected, commenter BostonTea at Steve Sailer’s blog cites a paper concluding that the google violent crime rate is higher — in fact much higher — than the already disproportionately high rate shown in official FBI crime stats, because hispanics are almost entirely classified as “White” in federal statistics.

Steve, did you read this paper – Steffensmeier et al, “Reassessing Trends in Black Violent Crime, 1980-2008″?

We know that black males and females whose race was identified are responsible for over 50% of nation’s homicides. But there’s a huge problem with official assessments and conclusions about trends in violence based on national statistics published annually in the FBI’s UCR.

In federal statistics an overwhelming majority of the U.S. Hispanic population is classified as White (93%), whereas 4% of Hispanics are considered Black. Also crime-reporting programs typically record Hispanic arrests as White arrestees, failing to separate ethnicity from race – in particular, failing to separate Hispanics from non-Hispanic Whites. This does not only limit understanding of ethnic involvement but also hides the true disparity between White-Black crime rates (when ethnicity is NOT considered the disparity between the two races is less extreme) and tends to inflate White rates and deflate Black rates. It is called the “Hispanic effect”.

After creating estimates of “clean” White and “clean” Black arrest counts that do not include Hispanics, Steffensmeier et al. discovered that the Black share of violent crime was enlarged from 51% to 64% for homicide category and from 59% to 70% for robbery. As far as ratios are concerned, the average Black–White ratio for homicide was 7:1 using official FBI’s figures and jumped to almost 12:1 after adjusting (after separating Hispanics from non-Hispanic Whites). Same for robbery: ratio jumped from 10:1 to 15:1.

64%!

In essence, classifying Hispanic arrestees with Whites (or Blacks) deflates the Black fraction of arrests and deflates the Black–White arrest rate ratio, particularly for the more reliably reported offenses of homicide and robbery.

And likewise classifying hispanic arrestees as White (or google) deflates the hispanic crime rate. Someone should inform Ron Unz of this paper.

There’s a good reason why shitlibs cling to the cognitive emollient of rank hypocrisy. As urban dwellers they know the truth about google propensity to violence, and would prefer the expediency of hypocrisy (i.e., the disconnect between their stated beliefs and their real world actions) to the torturous ordeal of exposing their hysterically fragile egos to honest self-reflection that could potentially give succor — and a mischievous Pepe-ian smirk — to their eternal enemies, the deplorable BadWhites/Goyim.

Read Full Post »

The Wash Post-Op anti-White propaganda blitz by Jonathon Morgan.

The debunking.

Will the Post-Op issue a retraction?

Not holding breath…

Read Full Post »

You’d have to be living under a rock to miss the active and accelerating Western elite propaganda campaign to promote miscegenation, particularly of the White woman-black man variety. So the question becomes, why are the elite doing this?

A Twatterer (@JamesGaius) gets to one of the prime motivations, in my opinion:

Perhaps that is why (((they))) promote miscegenation. Produces more rootless people who don’t understand populism.

The elite fear populist revolts, as they should, and they intuitively know that populism is racial identity by another name, so in their globalist whore minds it makes sense to decouple their current nation of residence from its racial roots. Miscegenation is a permanent and devastatingly complete decoupling, forever severing the race ties that emotionally bind a people to their land. In this way they hope the resulting mulatto mudslide (which they will not allow to pollute their own families, of course) will bury any idyllic sentiment for heritage America, ushering in a glorious epoch of transnational progressivism managed by a hyperwealthy technocratic asborger consortium selling low quality baubles and “upgrades” to a mass of deracinated morons unable to mount effective countermeasures to preserve an Historic America culture that is now more foreign to them than the farthest-flung corners of the earth.

Other, mutually reinforcing motivations for elite (and sub-elite) promotion of mongrelization:

  • virtue signaling for upper middle class peer approval
  • backwards rationalization to accommodate a family member who has miscegenated
  • suppression of natural feelings of disgust toward miscegenation
  • moral posturing by comfortably untested Christians eager to prove their godliness
  • necessity driven by sexual choices
  • ego assuaging driven by the past sexual choices of one’s current lover
  • hostile outsider subversion cultivated by historical grievance toward the majority native stock
  • feels good man

The elite promotion of miscegenation has had mixed results; succeeding in ostracizing opponents and creating a social expectation of full-throated approval, but failing (until recently) to significantly change what really matters: mate choice in the free and liberated sexual market.

The social expectation pro-miscegenation successes of the elite War Against Nationhood are seen in late stage America surveys showing consistent and high White support for homophilia and miscegenation. But these public surveys are like negatives of people’s true feelings. A public poll inquiring for opinions on what is essentially one’s social status in the modern sexual market is likely to produce the opposite of privately-held truths and behavior. In reality, every parent secretly fears their kid turning gay or marrying out of the race. Even the shitlib parents fear it, (though they would never admit it to anyone, including themselves, but they will feel a limbic eddy of revulsion just the same).

In contrast, the mate market failures of the elite miscegenation project are evident in the historically very low rates of interracial dating and intermarriage, especially between Whites and blacks. The heart and the loins are not easily moved to desire what they don’t.

HOWEVER, there is Census Bureau data that proves the aggressive, malevolent, and unrelenting elite promotion of miscegenation (primarily via TV, movies, advertising, and mass importation of nonwhite migrants altering the demographic equation) is beginning to have its intended effect on the real world, practical romantic choices of Whites. In 1980, the share of intermarriages from the total married population was 3.2%. In 2010 it hit an all-time high of 8.4%.

Despite the interracial dating and marrying trends, the raw numbers for White race preservationists still look manageable. In 2010, only 9% of American Whites outmarried to a nonWhite, the lowest intermarriage rate of all racial groups in the US, (keep in the dankest part of your mind, this says nothing about interracial patterns of premarital fucking). However, the trends are unmistakable, and intermarriage is rising relatively quickly for all races in America, including Whites for whom their share of newlywed intermarried couples rose from 8.9% in 2008 to 9.4% in 2010.

My thinking is that a large nation can tolerate some crossing of the jizz streams at the margins of society. What it can’t tolerate is a full-scale, weaponized, anti-White, pro-miscegenation propaganda assault that year by year carves out a higher share of Narrative-duped Whites willing to commit the ultimate disloyalty of abruptly ending their genetic, cultural and aesthetic lineage. Perhaps love can conquer all….or, more likely, a politicized love can temporarily soothe the misgivings and percolating regrets that inevitably follow in the wake of racial seppuku.

Read Full Post »

Racism
Sexism
Anti-Semitism
Islamophobia
Homophobia
Xenophobia
Judgmentalism

The above is a riff on thecunt’s LGBTQ speech from Friday, in which she labeled Trump’s supporters a “basket of deplorables” (aka normal, sexually dimorphic Americans).

“You could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the ‘basket of deplorables.’ They’re racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic, you name it,” Clinton said.

Hillary recites a moral panic laundry list of -isms and -phobias & ends with “you name it”. That coda is very telling. As an id-blurt it reveals that Hillary and her ilk don’t really feel the moral urgency of their frightwords as much as they use them as weapons to intimidate their cucked-up enemies into a cowardly submission.

Thecunt, whether she understands it or not, enunciated the tenets of the Left’s new Secularism faith. The Seven Deplorable Sins are a guide to how the typical shitlib measures a person’s worth, because everyone needs a religion, even shitlibs who have discarded Christian Puritanism for “enlightened” atheism. The religious compulsion is an evolved trait in humans; all that differs across generations is how it’s expressed.

Compare and cuntrast with the Seven Deadly Sins of traditional Christianity:

Lust
Gluttony
Greed
Sloth
Wrath
Envy
Pride

The difference? The Seven Deplorable Sins of Secularism are affronts to the high priests. The Seven Deadly Sins of Christianity are affronts to God and self.

As Twatter renegade @Ricky_Vaughn99 notes, our modern priests are like the Pharisees in Jesus’ time. And like the Pharisees, if you cross them they’ll try to cast you out of polite society.

The Seven Deplorable Sins are at their core rationalizations for a pleasure island autistopia where harm is banished, personal liberation is the highest ideal, and equality and fairness overcome human nature. And, coincidentally, where the moral paragons of this nonjudgmental religion are free to judge the rabble as unworthy of redemption. Heaven on earth, plus the inevitable feedback loops, unintended consequences, and community disruption that always follow in the wake of liberal utopias.

As a Pepe foot soldier quipped, the central principle of Secularism is “Don’t judge your neighbor as you don’t judge yourself”. It’s the religion of solipsists, (for if one where to judge another, that would mean one would have reason to judge oneself….and that way leads to bad feels).

As another Twatterer wryly noted, the vacuity of the Seven Deplorable Sins is revealed when we attempt to identify the inverse of them; in other words, their virtuous opposites.

Racism => Race Equalism
Sexism => “Men and women are the same except for genitals, and not even then”
Anti-Semitism => Ignore ethnic traits and tribal power imbalances
Islamophobia => NAMALT
Xenophobia => Xenophilia (but not in my backyard)
Homophobia => Love Wins
Judgmentalism => You are free to be judged, but not to judge (the one sin to rule them all)

The inverse of each of the Seven Deplorable Sins is the same: blindness. Pattern denial. Willful ignorance.

In contrast, the inverse of each of the traditional Seven Deadly Sins is a list of seven virtues.

The modern religion of Secularism doesn’t proselytize for anything Good. All it preaches is the child-like virtue of Not Bad. It aspires to nothing but avoidance of social opprobrium. The problem with that ethos is the ever-shifting definition of what qualifies as socially unacceptable. The Secularist’s Seven Deplorable Sins are outgrowths of temporal sensibilities and the detritus of verbally dexterous status whores jockeying for power, distinct in nature from the Seven Deadly Sins which resonate precisely because they tap into timeless truths about humanity and fallen man.

Read Full Post »

In case you aren’t on Twatter, this studious evisceration of an article written by Jonathon Morgan purporting to “prove” that the alt-right is filled with “radical extremists” intent on committing the next 9/11 is one of the best counter-salvos against an emergent shitlib hate meme I have come across.

I suggest you take some time to read it through. Conclusion: What Morgan identifies as evidence of “alt-right radicalization” is actually just evidence that the alt-right is saying things that the media ACTIVELY COVERS UP OR REFUSES TO SAY.

Aligning yourself against the anti-Gentile narrative of the leftoid media hivemind can now class you as a “radical extremist” who is part of a “breeding ground for terrorism”. Did you get that? If you mention an unauthorized fact concerning our wonderful Diversitopia you are the equivalent of an ISIS supporter and should be placed on an FBI anti-terrorism watch list.

We are dealing with some truly evil manipulative fucks running the show in America. It almost as if they’re doing everything in their power to bring to life the very angry backlash they claim to want to avoid.

***

PS Shitlibs love quoting this mathematically ignorant “statistic” from Time:

In fact, until the nightclub shootings in Orlando, white extremists had committed more attacks and killed more Americans than jihadist extremists since 9/11.

Do shitlibs even math? The word a shitlib hates to hear more than any other is “disproportionate”. Meaning, as a share of their population (1%), Muslims in America are 5,000% more likely than non-Muslim Americans to commit a terrorist attack.

5000

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: