Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Psy Ops’ Category

This is great article by Bruce Charlton, a must-read, because it explains so much about post-America shitlibbery. (For a complementary thread on the topic, try here.)

Executive Summary: what liberals have in IQ they lack in common sense. It’s an evolutionary trade-off.

In short, it has often been observed that high IQ types are lacking in ‘common sense’ – and especially when it comes to dealing with other human beings. General intelligence is not just a cognitive ability; it is also a cognitive disposition. So, the greater cognitive abilities of higher IQ tend also to be accompanied by a distinctive high IQ personality type including the trait of ‘Openness to experience’, ‘enlightened’ or progressive left-wing political values, and atheism. Drawing on the ideas of Kanazawa, my suggested explanation for this association between intelligence and personality is that an increasing relative level of IQ brings with it a tendency differentially to over-use general intelligence in problem-solving, and to over-ride those instinctive and spontaneous forms of evolved behaviour which could be termed common sense. Preferential use of abstract analysis is often useful when dealing with the many evolutionary novelties to be found in modernizing societies; but is not usually useful for dealing with social and psychological problems for which humans have evolved ‘domain-specific’ adaptive behaviours. And since evolved common sense usually produces the right answers in the social domain; this implies that, when it comes to solving social problems, the most intelligent people are more likely than those of average intelligence to have novel but silly ideas, and therefore to believe and behave maladaptively. I further suggest that this random silliness of the most intelligent people may be amplified to generate systematic wrongness when intellectuals are in addition ‘advertising’ their own high intelligence in the evolutionarily novel context of a modern IQ meritocracy. The cognitively-stratified context of communicating almost-exclusively with others of similar intelligence, generates opinions and behaviours among the highest IQ people which are not just lacking in common sense but perversely wrong. Hence the phenomenon of ‘political correctness’ (PC); whereby false and foolish ideas have come to dominate, and moralistically be enforced upon, the ruling elites of whole nations.

That description sounds precisely like the basis for the cognitive and social schisms currently tearing apart Western nations. Self-segregating and supercharged-signaling “clever sillies” are running their homelands into the ground with overbearing government interventions to “close the gap” and open borders to “create more gaps”. This stupidity of intelligence signaling would be funny if it weren’t also so damned threatening to the continued survival of the West.

The over-use of abstract reasoning may be most obvious in the social domain, where normal humans are richly equipped with evolved psychological mechanisms both for here-and-now interactions (e.g. rapidly reading emotions from facial expression, gesture and posture, and speech intonation) and for ‘strategic’ modelling of social interactions to understand predict and manipulate the behaviour of others. Social strategies deploy inferred knowledge about the dispositions, motivations and intentions of others. When the most intelligent people over-ride the social intelligence systems and apply generic, abstract and systematic reasoning of the kind which is enhanced among higher IQ people, they are ignoring an ‘expert system’ in favour of a non-expert system.

For an immediately palpable example of SMRT shitlibs applying abstract and systematic reasoning to a social intelligence system, see their snarky “you’re more likely to be killed by falling furniture than by a Muslim terrorist” apples-to-oranges comparison. (Socially intelligent reply: “Sure but falling furniture isn’t getting on planes with me, patting me down after a two hour wait in the TSA line, or calling for death to all infidels.”)

Charlton goes on to explain why it seems like we are seeing more pajamaboy shitlib faces and cuckfaces in the West:

Indeed, I suggest that higher levels of the personality trait of Openness in higher IQ people may be the flip-side of this over-use of abstraction. I regard Openness as the result of deploying abstract analysis for social problems to yield unstable and unpredictable results, when innate social intelligence would tend to yield predictable and stable results. This might plausibly underlie the tendency of the most intelligent people in modernizing societies to hold ‘left-wing’ political views.

I would argue that neophilia (or novelty-seeking) is a driving attribute of the personality trait of Openness; and a disposition common in adolescents and immature adults who display what I have termed ‘psychological neoteny’.

Psychological neoteny is likely correlated, by the associative property, with physical and facial neoteny. Physiognomy is real, and it’s no accident that we often observe the silliest of shitlibs have very punchable faces devoid of any masculinity.

Shitlibs are, in essence, arrested adolescents, forever on the hunt for the next thrill to add meaning to their disconnected lives. Risk-taking and novelty-seeking are useful traits to have when one must impress a mate (usually a man impressing a girl) or broaden the pool of acceptable mates; but those traits are destructive when scaled up to the level of social policy and beyond the bounds of the life stage when mate acquisition is paramount.

In such an evolutionarily-unprecedented, artificial ‘hothouse’ environment, it is plausible that any IQ-related behaviours are amplified: partly because there is little counter-pressure from the less intelligent people with less neophiliac personalities, and perhaps mainly because there is a great deal of IQ-advertisement. Indeed, it looks very much as if the elites of modern societies are characterized by considerable IQ-signalling. Sometimes this is direct advertisement (e.g. when boasting about intellectual attainments or attendance at highly-selective colleges) and more often the signalling is subtly-indirect when people display the attitudes, beliefs, fashions, manners and hobbies associated with high intelligence. This advertising is probably based on sexual selection, if IQ has been a measure of general fitness during human evolutionary history, and was associated with a wide range of adaptive traits.

But we are now at the point when the libshit SMRT mate signaling has reached sexual market saturation; I predict, and in fact we can see it happening already, that deftly counter-signaling the leftoid equalism orthodoxy will be a powerful display of fitness, for what do women love more than a bad boy rule-breaker who can buck the system and not just survive, but thrive? As always, BALLS wins babes.

My hunch is that it is this kind of IQ-advertisement which has led to the most intelligent people in modern societies having ideas about social phenomena that are not just randomly incorrect (due to inappropriately misapplying abstract analysis) but are systematically wrong. I am talking of the phenomenon known as political correctness (PC) in which foolish and false ideas have become moralistically-enforced among the ruling intellectual elite. And these ideas have invaded academic, political and social discourse. Because while the stereotypical nutty professor in the hard sciences is a brilliant scientist but silly about everything else; the stereotypical nutty professor social scientist or humanities professor is not just silly about ‘everything else’, but also silly in their professional work.

I was convinced before reading this Charlton hypothesis that what’s happening in the AngloGermanoSphere is runaway “intelligence signaling”; that is, aesthetically disfigured and socially untethered White shitlibs of the West can only pride themselves on their abstraction smarts, and to stay ahead of their peers they have to signal hard against common sense, leading to xenophilia spirals (as well as degeneracy spirals and anti-White spirals).

(As a reader wrote, “Believing in a lie can require more intelligence; you have to know the truth to conceal it properly, plus the pleasing lie, plus the explanation why the lie is more true than the truth.”)

What’s happened is that common sense (or gut instinct, or mental sanity) has become associated with declassé opinions and flyover rubes. The cause of this association is complex, but it’s where we are today and it means that the shitlib clown-cognition signaling will continue until a cataclysm forces common sense on them. I doubt that increasingly insulated, credentialist suck-up shitlibs will rediscover the merits of common sense on their own.

Addendum: the Maul-Right is the next stage of human evolution: high IQ AND common sense. And that fact, more than any other, explains the hysterical response of the Left to dissident crimethinkers and to Trump; the Left knows a real threat to their rule when they see one.

Read Full Post »

Jonathan Haidt researched differences in morality between liberals and conservatives and one of his most striking findings was that liberals have a much higher threshold of disgust than do conservatives….that is, it take a lot more to disgust a liberal.

Related, liberals may also have a more difficult time judging when a person is disgusted, or reading the feeling of disgust on a person’s face. Liberals, iow, have a blind spot to disgust, (and this would partly explain their irrational xenophilia).

Given this premise, a reader wonders if a recent shitlibistan viral meme concerning photos taken of Ivanka Trump and Justine Truvada together and Ivanka’s purported lustful gaze is in fact a shitlib misidentification of Ivanka’s disgust for Truvada.

saw this bouncing around with the libs on fbook. Apparently they have a tough time distinguishing from female lust and female disgust….in one picture she is greeting him with a well rehearsed fake smile, the next photo she is looking right at him with a level of disgust that she can’t even fully hide. Clenched teeth in a forced half smile, a look of restrained dominance…in the other photo she isn’t even looking at him….

but of course, i suppose that is what love looks like to the beta male of our day

anyways, love the blog, keep it up. Cheers

The shitlib beta male probably does mistake disgust for love, because at least its a form of attention!

ivankatruvada

Is this Ivanka-Truvada rapprochement riven with lustful stirrings, or barely concealed disgusted misgivings? At least this photo above appears to me to show a latent disgust as much as it may display a blatant lust.

Whatever one may say about Truvada’s looks, his gay effeminate male feminist demeanor will turn off women soon enough. Most women will figure Justine for a closeted homosexual not long after he takes them home to discuss his admiration for Beyonce.

Read Full Post »

Is refugee pimping by Western leaders and shitlibs a nation-wide scale-up of the PUA tactic peacocking (aka the handicap principle)?

Peacocking signals to potential mates you are so HSMV you can handle the burden of unneeded impediments. Refugees are unneeded impediments…for Trump-supporting flyovers, because that’s where the Gay Mulatto and the various international adoption Christcuck agencies have been relocating the refugees.

“Refugees Welcome” shitlibs (and their limpwristed leaders) get the reward of peacocking in the vestments of refugee virtue signaling without taking on any of the risk of actually living side by side with hordes of transplanted refugees that they can’t escape from into super zips and electronically gated apartment buildings.

Signaling one’s commitment to welcome refugees, particularly brown non-Christian refugees, is a demonstration of sexual market value by shitlibs who don’t have alternate, more traditional means of advertising their sexual and resource fitness, (through means, for instance, that include physical strength, emotional stability, masculinity, femininity, or yes, even looks).

PS The latest research has discovered that conservatives are, on average, better looking than are liberals.

PPS Yet another Chateau maxim based on real life observation is affirmed by the labcoats: Shitlibbery is the ideology of the ugly, infirm, freakish, and degenerate, whose motivation is driven primarily by a desire to upend normal society and replace it with a dystopian system that is more accommodating of their physical and psychological afflictions.

Read Full Post »

This blog has come perilously close to extermination by Big Brother since the Time of the Trumpening dawned over America.

In the past few months, Chateau Heartiste and subsidiaries have been threatened with a WordPress shutdown, a legal injunction, and a Twatter ban.

Exhibit A:

The WordPress SHUTITDOWN threat was delivered just before the 2016 election, but didn’t come to light until recently thanks to a belated forwarding by a freelance Chateau proprietor. A WordPress consigliere (all names redacted to protect the Chateau from further threats of elimination) had informed this ‘umble retreat of realtalk that WordPress had “received several complaints” about the “content of the blog”, specifically the “tone” of the following posts:

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/10/11/election-fraud-its-happening/

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/10/06/this-will-not-end-well/

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/10/07/paul-ryan-worlds-biggest-faggot/

How wude!

WordPress reiterated its commitment to free speech for dissidents, but not without appending a veiled threat of closure in the future, should Chateau house lords prove unwilling to sufficiently neuter the message of this blog.

WordPress.com is deeply committed to free speech and will not take content down just because someone find it offensive or disagrees with the point of view. As such, we are not taking any action at this time.

at this time…..but you’d better watch yourself from here on out!

However, we don’t allow genuine calls for violence or death against individuals or groups to be posted on WordPress.com. Some of your content is approaching that line and we ask that you be aware of our policies to avoid a potential suspension in the future.

“approaching that line”. There’s a lot of legal gray area that can be scoured within those three leetle words to make a permanent exile stick under current TOS.

I reread the above three posts that are the heart of the complaints against CH. There were no calls for violence or death threats. There were the usual allusions to the metaphorical shiv of argument that should be obvious to fair-minded readers from the context in which the allusions are embedded. There were warnings of bad things that could happen on the societal level if the anti-White and anti-free speech Left continued their total war against heritage America. But no direct threats to anyone, under even the loosest and goosiest interpretations of the posts in question.

(The CuckRyan post did contain an image of our favorite reckoning day prop, which can be interpreted as a call to action against an individual (in this case, Ryan), so I removed that image. Wouldn’t want to send the cucks shrieking in terror and waking up in cold sweats every night.)

The WordPress suspension was, in retrospect, narrowly avoided, but the stay of execution came with an implied promise that future complaints from butthurt shitlibs reading this blog would be treated with the utmost seriousness and the terms for suspension greatly attenuated to satisfy the bloodlust of the anti-Chateau complainants.

Exhibit B:

A hilariously censorious and hysterical “legal injunction” to remove some off-topic comments made by Captain Obvious within a thread to a throwaway one-line post that linked a funny status update from MPC.

PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCE – TAKE DOWN DEMAND

To Those Who Own and Operate Chateau Heartiste:

I represent [REDACTED]. On June 17, 2016, between 3:09 and 3:22 p.m., you permitted to be posted on your website a series of false, derogatory, and illegal hate messages regarding (((REDACTED))) (the “Posts”). The Posts may be found at this link: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/06/17/americas-epitaph/. Like the majority of the disgusting content on this website, the Posts offend basic human decency and are not protected speech under the First Amendment.

The “Posts” this mewling nancyboy refers to are the comments to the post. The post itself is most certainly protected speech under the First Amendment, and did not reference his “client” in any way.

They are calculated to humiliate my client for no reason other than hate-mongering. Not only are the Posts anti-women and support the most malicious and vile time in human history – the Holocaust – but the basis for the Posts is patently false. [REDACTED] never knew nor examined [REDACTED]; [REDACTED] has admitted that its statement to the contrary was false, and [REDACTED] has been sued for its misconduct.

This message demands that the Posts be taken down immediately. If the Posts are not taken down by 11:30 a.m. EST on February 10, 2017, my client will seek all legal remedies available […], including seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages, and injunctive relief. You should not re-post, correct, or in any manner republish any content referencing [REDACTED]. You should only delete the offensive Posts and do so immediately.

Who needs the headache of defending so trite an issue? I deleted the comments by Captain Obvious. I don’t know if his comments were defamatory or not, and I don’t care. The copyright user agreement clearly states the blog hosts are not responsible for the content of the comments. I just find it funny that a miffed feminist and her male feminist lackey couldn’t just simply request a comment removal (which would have been promptly honored, as has been done for others who’ve nicely requested comment removals for personal reasons) without adding all the extraneous MUH MISOGYNY shitlib shrieking about this blog’s handcrafted paeans to truth and beauty. How very OY VEY.

Govern yourself accordingly.

[REDACTED]

WILL DO, SCHOOLMARM. HOW CAN YOU HAVE ANY PUDDING IF YOU DON’T EAT YOUR MEAT.

PS I noticed there weren’t any designations of legal authority in the above email. No credentialist suckup letters after the name of the person who wrote and sent the email. All a fake-out? The volatile, over-the-top nature of the email would suggest it.

Exhibit C:

Sadly, the Twatter ban has happened. The Chateau emissary tasked with enlivening the Twatter timelines of so many vapid and trollable shitlibs has been…..disappeared. Apparently, Le Chateau was on a list.

I can’t vouch for the authenticity of this insider information leaked from Twatter headquarters that purports to be a list of Realtalker accounts targeted for extermination.

/pol/ got a hold of this list and publicly posted it. Chateau Emissary (the ambassador of the Chateau Heartiste blog) was listed at number 53 on Twatter’s inverted version of Schindler’s List (those identified and targeted by Twatter for liquidation on the flimsiest possible pretext and at the earliest possible convenience).

twatterlist

CH made the first page! I assume “frequency” refers to the number of butt-chafed shitlib complaints each account received. The list looks a couple of months old, because ChateauEmissary had 12,500 followers on the day of its (likely permanent) suspension.

Some more inside info (you may have to zoom in to read this):

twatterlistinsider

These two near misses and one successful ban point to a larger theme; namely, the methods used by the Leftoid Establishment to silence heretics to their one-world one-race equalism orthodoxy.

The Leftoid Establishment Silencing Protocol utilizes three primary means of manufacturing consent and marginalizing recalcitrants:

  1. customer complaints (often coordinated and delivered en masse by non-customers)
  2. legal threats
  3. liquidation lists

The WordPress warning to CH is a classic case of a corporate entity bowing to pressure from a stream of shitlib complaints with little to no grounding. But this is a tactic for which shitlib SJWs are renowned: mass coordinated complaints that strike suddenly and are intended to make a corporation bend to the social justice warrioresses’ will before all the facts are in and digested. If it could happen to James Watson, it could happen to you.

The “legal injunction” email is another shitlib favorite: threaten baseless legal action in the scariest language possible and hope for instant capitulation. Often, shitlibs who are unsatisfied with the slow pace of legal intervention will resort to taking the law in their own hands by doxxing their foes, or even real-life stalking internet enemies.

Finally, the Twatter ban reveals the shitlib predilection for enemy lists. Shitlibs are sensitive to crimethink and need to know up front who is acceptable reading and who is verboten. They love enemy lists because the lists protect them from stumbling onto triggering words or hatefacts. Better still, they love lists that fall into the hands of sympathetic corporate honchos who can make their exterminationist dreams come true.

Complaints, threats, lists…..these are the swarming tactics of shitlibs. Anonymous Conservative would have a lot to say about the tendency of r-selected liberals to swarm, and how that swarming instinct protects the rabbit warren from powerful, but outnumbered, predators that can be distracted from the focus of their hunt.

Diversity + Proximity (aka Globalization) means censorship of dissident views that might question the GloboHomo tenets. The Shitlib Swarm of Censorship can be defeated, but it requires smarter thinking than what the controlled cuck opposition has given us so far. Think of K-selected species like the wolf; they attack in small packs by cutting off and isolating a prey animal from its stampeding herd. Something similar should apply to social unrest that is headed by massive shitlib signaling herds.

The K-selected shitlords must use their numerically smaller but individually stronger forces to cut a swath through the shitlib swarm; isolate a member of the shitlib herd and hunt it down ruthlessly. Don’t get distracted. Then move on to the next whimpering and weak shitlib that has strayed from the pack and hunt it down. Repeat ad nauseam until the fields are littered with the shredded ego tufts of shitlib fur.

Ignore hazy shitlib complaints while lodging targeted shitlord complaints.

Ignore vacuous shitlib legal threats while lodging pointed shitlord legal threats.

Proudly flaunt shitlib lists while making shitlord lists.

Then rhetorically and politically pick off isolated and surrounded groups of shitlibs by exploiting their natural aversion to loyalty and setting them against each other. Each small loss will quickly compound until the entire rabbit warren is scattered and hopping in every direction for safety.

Undermining the integrity of the shitlib warren in this way is a long haul proposition, but be heartened that a tolerance threshold for being preyed upon exists for shitlibs, beyond which they will fold in unison to a new orthodoxy.

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Audi released a Super Bowl ad that is more devious than it looks at first glance. Superficially a feminist boilerplate hack job, its real message is that Audi is a car for the GoodWhite victors in their eternal war against the BadWhite losers.

The Internet is in the proverbial tizzy about Audi’s “feminist” Super Bowl advertisement, in which the automaker comes out in favor of equal pay for women.

***

After watching the one-minute advertisement carefully, however, I understood feminism, or equal pay, is the last thing Audi wants you to take away from it. The message is far subtler, and more powerful, than the dull recitation of the pseudo-progressive catechism droning on in the background. This spot is visual — and as you’ll see below, you can’t understand it until you watch it and see what it’s really telling you.

Advertising — especially advertising of the anti-White male and anti-BadWhite varieties — is a psy ops of bone-chillingly manipulative complexity and influence. The GloboHomoBezos Ministry of Propaganda did not get to where it is by playing softball. And for quite a long time, American advertising has had as its mission statement the demoralization and demonization of White people who aren’t sufficiently eager to be absorbed into the mudworld and feminist man-hating borg.

Well, if you’ve been reading along, I think you’ve figured out what the real message of this Audi advertisement is, but just in case you’ve been napping I will spell it out for you: Money and breeding always beat poor white trash. Those other kids in the race, from the overweight boys to the hick who actually had an American flag helmet to the stripper-glitter girl? They never had a chance. They’re losers and they always will be, just like their loser parents. Audi is the choice of the winners in today’s economy, the smooth talkers who say all the right things in all the right meetings and are promoted up the chain because they are tall (yes, that makes a difference) and handsome without being overly masculine or threatening-looking.

At the end of this race, it’s left to the Morlocks to clean the place up and pack the derby cars into their trashy pickup trucks, while the beautiful people stride off into the California sun, the natural and carefree winners of life’s lottery.

The White War is heating up. Instead of finding common ground, White factions are squaring off and preparing in every way but firing actual shots for a coming Civil War II. Advertisers that sell to upscale GoodWhite (or, what they should be called, FoolWhite) markets have chosen sides and all firepower is now directed without remorse or mercy on the enemy BoldWhites.

It’s getting hot in here. The nearer shitlibs approach their reckoning and destruction of their equalism worldview, the louder and more insistent will be their calls for violence. America will hit a breaking point, a threshold of discarded empathy, when the sputtering vituperation will boil over into manifest vengeance. This reality is becoming less avoidable by the day. And, as I have cautioned shitlibs who strayed into this happy hunting ground before, their side won’t win this time around.

Read Full Post »

Why are mass protests usually the domain of crazy-eyed leftoids? I’ve mentioned it before — and parisian privilege mentions it here — that geographic distribution plays a role in the Right-Left mass protest disparity. It’s simply a fact that densely populated coastal cities loaded up with shitlibs provide a large, quickly mobilized base from which to efficiently scale up a mass protest.

Conservatives number in the single percentiles in most of the blue megalopolises that host these mass protests; they live in the suburbs and towns, so getting into the city for them means a minimum one hour trek by car and then finding street parking or paying through the nose for it at a garage. Shitlibs living in the city can roll out of bed, and if they skip the shower (they often do), they can be downtown with their paper mache puppets in fifteen minutes flat. Geographic centralization and density without a doubt amplifies shitlib protest formation.

And it’s far easier to get the word out about a protest inside of shitlibistans. One poster advertising a march stapled to a kiosk on one city block will reach a thousand eyeballs. Where would one tape up a poster in the suburbs? A street light pole. Ok, that’ll be seen by the fifteen people who live on that leafy suburban street.

Pleasureman unnecessarily and superciliously objects to this theory, which is a habit I’ve noticed of him. PugnaciousMan is a natural contrarian — it’s the trait that probably drew him to the maul-right and against the reigning equalism orthodoxy — but he carries his contrarian banner into too many battlefields, frequently winding up contradicting himself out of stubborn resistance to conforming to a majority view. No need for the perpetual pissiness, Pman, you can curb your obstinacy without losing e-dad cred. Geography plays a role in the relative paucity of conservative mass protests; so do other factors, which you and others in your thread wrote about; the factors aren’t mutually exclusive.

Pman prefers to blame character or personality failings of conservatives for their aversion to political activism. He belittles conservatives for this, but it’s unfair to call conservative “inactivism” a failing; rather, conservatives have inherited a unique suite of personality traits and moral feelings that predispose them to methods of registering their disagreement and of seeking social belonging that aren’t mass protests.

I happen to think the moral dimension of DISGUST has a lot to tell us about leftoid protest organizational skill and affinity for mass protesting. A big moral chasm between conservatives and liberals is the feeling of disgust; cons have low disgust thresholds (they are acutely sensitive to disgusting things or disgusting people) and libs have high disgust thresholds (they can tolerate, even enjoy wallowing in, disgusting things). Gathering tit-to-tit and fagface-to-fagface by the thousands, hoisting obscene placards and wearing obscene costumes, and cursing for hours at the top of one’s lungs feels disgusting to cons. Libs, otoh, practically live for the degenerate slop life.

Keep in mind, too, that atomized city living requires a different way of looking at friendships. SWPL city libs have fewer means of building social connections than do cons. The urban shitlib has lost the social glue of his family and the neighborhood he grew up in. He has to befriend people through his job…or through similar political outlook. And the multiracial, low trust blue cities lean heavily on politics as a friendship glue, at least for Whites. So you’ve got a dense population of extremely politicized shitlibs yearning for social belonging who are within walking distance of mass protest sites and are bombarded on every street corner with posters screaming for “resistance”.

Now, I happen to agree with Pman and others that cons need to get better at mass protesting, or whatever the optical equivalent of mass protesting is, because as long as the media acts as a leftoid propaganda mill framing all lib vice as virtue and con virtue as vice, cons can’t afford to cede the protest arena to shitlib shenanigans. Cons may not like it, but when Civil War II is looming it’s time to tear away from the college football and hit the streets, real or metaphorical, to do your part reframing the media anti-White message machine. If there was ever a time for acting and not just reacting, this is it.

But the adage “maximum your strengths, minimize your weaknesses” applies here; maybe cons shouldn’t bother getting in the street theater mud with shitlibs where the latter are strongest. I don’t know what the optimal counter-attack will be for cons, but it has to include defusing the leftoid legacy media normie-destruction protocol. Which Trump is doing, PBUH.

I also don’t buy the argument that leftoids are better at organizing protests because they’re SMRTer or more conscientious than conservatives.

And contrary to the self-serving pablum pushed by conservatives, almost all of these high-involvement liberal activists have jobs and a healthy majority have at least some sort of family commitment. They’re just way more willing to make personal sacrifices for the sake of political action than conservatives are, and the squalid direction of American society over the last half century bears witness to this tragic fact.

Maybe the top of the shitlib protest organizational chart is staffed with UMC mcmansion strivers, but the rank and file — you know the hundreds of thousands down on the field capturing media attention — really are disproportionately filled with bitter aging spinsters, childless shrikes with libtart degrees working as baristas, and their weak chinless male hangers-on thinking of post-protest pity blowies.

The sexual market is, like with most big picture issues, the best lens for viewing the phenomenon of mass protesting. Conservatives find fulfillment checking off in a timely manner the traditional milestones of a good life. Liberals below the UMC level enjoy more chaotic, novelty-seeking lives, and part of that can mean enduring stretches of sexual and romantic dissatisfaction or loneliness. And in fact we see this behavioral preference of liberals reflected in the fertility of their women, who average fewer kids than do conservative women. Mass protests are the shitlib sublimation of their reduced fertility. They hope their slogans will seed the future they aren’t conceiving.

Conservatives may numerically outnumber liberals nationally, but it doesn’t matter because in the political protest arena that anyone is showing up to, liberals vastly outnumber cons. So cons should focus on fighting an asymmetric war against the louder voices of the Left. This could mean hidden camera type stuff, like James O’Keefe does, or prank videos, like Sam Hyde does. On a larger scale, it means trust-busting the tech and media oligarchies. Guerrilla tactics are how the geographically distributed Right will take down the densely urbanized Left. Small, thematically targeted protests by cons in their suburbs and towns, multiplied a thousand-fold across the nation and coordinated to exploit the transmission power of the net, WILL have an impact on the media narrative, even if the media tries to negatively spin it.

And it needs to be said, conservatives steeled themselves for the fight when they unburdened themselves of the demoralizing dead weight of their cowardly cuckservative opinion “leaders”. Trump’s greatest blow, imo, was his utter annihilation of any coherent or effective controlled opposition of cuck saboteurs. Once he did that, he could turn his gatlings on the Left and the media with much greater force than if he had to fire while weaselly cucks were pushing the safety back on. Trump opened a way forward for local conservatives to fight back against the poz; his greatest gift to them has been to show that victory can be had without betraying one’s principles.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: