White men driven by a shared purpose, cooperating to defeat an enemy, are the most formidable force in the known universe.
But first, they have to overcome petty intra-ethnic divisions. Thankfully, the Democortez Party is doing that job for us; White male Dems are a breed being pushed off their habitat by invasive species.
Audacious E not-so-subtly hints that we MAGAmen can hasten the process by trolling the Diversitroid Fuggernaut into more quickly and permanently casting out the White men in their ranks (and thus depriving the Dems of critical leadership skills).
The Perfidious Mick Joe Crowleys of the USA may never come over to the MAGA side after their ousting from the Dems, but if we can successfully encourage their silencing and ostracism from Democortez politics, then we will have amplified the voice of the White MAGAmen on the other side who can save America from the abyss of virtue spiraling cat lady suicide.
The alpha male attracts hot women, attracts women strongly, and attracts a lot of women.
Quantity and quality of female interest defines the alpha male.
By that metric, all the members of REO Speedwagon were alphas, hauling groupie pussy in its prime like a shrimping net.
But within the subset ‘rocker’, we find subtle and not-so-subtle physiognomic differences of male value. In the photo above, there is a clear Chad and a clear Cuck.
CHAD: far right (ofc)
INTENSE ALPHA: 2nd from left
GOOFBALL ALPHA: far left
NICEGUY: middle
CUCK: 2nd from right
FYI, “intense alpha” is the brooding artist type who may or may not leave a lover before morning light. “Goofball alpha” is the class clown if the class clown wasn’t a secretly low self-esteem basketcase.
The Cuck with the homo pose is the lead singer, Kevin. The Surfer Chad is the bass player, Bruce. So did their real lives match their physiognomies? reactionary writes,
Mostly. Kevin was their lead singer and had a very effeminate/annoying voice. Bruce was there bass player and would occasionally do vocals. “Back on the Road Again” is sort of an alpha song.
So what distinguishes the Chad from the generic alpha male? Politics, for one. No Chad is With Her. In point of fact, very few alpha males are With Her, so that’s not telling us much. The Chad phenotype tends to more often align with conventional views of what characterizes an alpha male (heavy jawline, Eastwoodian squint, overhanging brow ridge, mesomorphic frame, perpetual smirk). This serves as a reminder that more often than not, real life alpha males don’t look like central casting alpha males. They don’t look like soyboy cucks either, but the physical properties of the alpha male span a wide spectrum.
Crucially, I think the biggest delineator of the Chad is his aversion to emoting. He keeps it “close to the vest”, except when he’s giving atomic wedgies to nerds. There’s an IDGAF vibe about him that says “when the time comes, I’ll gladly take up sword and rid our land of these locusts”. Balancing this is a hint of playfulness in the eyes, honed from years in middle and high school teasing girls to heights of tingle eruptions.
Halfway through this Carlos Slim Times article about the manosphere sounding the alarm about generationally trending low sperm counts in Western men, I spit out my bulletproof coffee when I read Roosh quoted saying this:
Daryush Valizadeh, who runs The Return of Kings, a men’s rights site, called the situation “a biological crisis” and one that women struggle to understand.
“Tell your editor to stop being an idiot and reassign the article to a man,” he wrote in a direct message on Twitter. “Then get in touch with me.”
That’s almost as good as “lol suk a dik”. If you’re gonna talk to the feministized corporate media, this is how you do it. Disparagingly, mockingly, condescendingly. Make these whorenalists the story. They deserve nothing less.
As if to punctuate the point of this post, Nellie Bowles (the NYBTimes typist) included a false claim in her story that the soy=>estrogen connection was debunked. It wasn’t. She is peddling Fake News.
If you have to pick a woman who only has 2 out 3 which two would you want in her
Under 25, under a buck-25.
haha, true but not what you asked. Ok, here goes:
I’d choose no debt and virgin. My thinking: A girl can’t recapture lost virginity, and between the two slut tells — debt and tats — the former will wind up costing me more than the latter. (M2F wealth transference is almost unavoidable in any relationship lasting longer than three months.)
Also, tats on a girl are a powerful indicator that she bangs like a beast.
Yes, I know how unlikely it is that a tatted virgin exists in the wild. This was a thought experiment, after all.
I miss the days when tattoos were only the hallmark of scumbags. Now they’re billboards for sluts and f@ggots.
There’s a “male” in one of my martial arts classes who fits the prototype: tall, thin, pale, nice, self-effacing, problem glasses. His noodly arms are covered shoulder to fingertips with a hideous hurricane of ink.
I find that almost more offensive than the tragedy of a beautiful woman tainting her virgin skin. At least some of them are intense and can fuck like beasts.
“He’s got a beard and menacing looking tattoos. My girl could definitely take him.”
Clown world indeed.
Tattoo rule of thumb:
Don’t (if you’re a girl).
If you’re a man, the size of your muscles should be larger than the expanse which the tattoo occupies. If you have noodle arms, no one will tremble before your steampunk butterfly tattoo that starts and finishes all the way around your concave bicep, leaving you looking like a domestic abuse victim.
Cunt: “You sound proud that you haven’t taken any refugees”
MAGApole: “Of course.” [ed: heh] “…we can be called populists, nationalists, racists…I don’t care. I care about my family and about my country.”
This is a man even the great Trump could learn from. Trump gets very very close to speaking in this plain commonsense way that cuts like a hot knife through so much sophistic skypery, but imo he has not yet achieved Pole position.
Racist?
I DON’T CARE. I CARE ABOUT MY FAMILY AND ABOUT MY COUNTRY
How is a virtue sniveling shitlib supposed to answer that without sounding like xir’s against family and country? Answer: xir can’t. And how is a shitlib supposed to wrest a publicly humiliating penance from someone who “doesn’t care” about the Fake Virtue of the anti-Whites? Answer: xir can’t.
This is how to reframe a charge of “racism” (aka “perspicacity”). Watch and learn from our based Outer Hajnal White brothers. Reframing like this comes naturally to them.
Btw, this is the same dumb BBC bint schooled by Jordan Peterson a while back.
***
In more MAGAman news, Tucker Carlson gets better every day. Here he is interviewing Michael Anton, another MAGAman (and former Trump cabinet member) who wrote the famous “Flight 93” essay:
Michael Anton has excellent physiognomy, which shouldn’t surprise anyone considering he was among the first to recognize the importance and necessity of the Trump Realignment, and the decadence and corruption of the Uniparty establishment.
This isn’t freshly trod ground for regular Chateau readers, but it bears repeating for the joy of triggering any wayward feminist cunts and their betasoy lackeys who stumble into this outpost of sexy chauvinism: SCIENCE continues amassing a trove of evidence vindicating the real world observation that women get hot n bothered for fun-lovin’ sexist men.
Women are hard-wired to find well-meaning sexist men MORE attractive because they think they will be protected and provided for, study findshttps://t.co/KDfxizQMho
Quite simply, women can’t trust male feminists to come through like men if times get tough. This basic mistrust of the masculinity of male feminists is toxic to female arousal.
Soyboys who cloyingly parrot feminist vagitudes and profess an abiding belief in the equality, sameness, and interchangeability of the sexes leave women emotionally cold, if not intellectually underwhelmed. And in the business of romance, the hindbrain owns the forebrain.
This is why careerist shrikes have such a hard time finding a man. They too want a man who will “provide and protect”, but their economic, occupational, and social success means that a vanishingly small pool of men can fit their bill. So they go alone to their cat graves, bitter and spiteful and leaning in to the lonesome last, tragicomic victims of their own hypergamy that evolved in an environment and sexual market in which women didn’t waste years of prime fertility pursuing the corner office.
You don’t have to beat women over the head with proclamations of their inferiority to bed them, but it helps to implicitly remind them of their vulnerabilities and dependencies through your unapologetic actions and self-entitled words. The ZFG jerkboy hypnotizes women because everything he does and says is the tacit antithesis of male feminism.
***
Cracker adds,
yeah, the fact that [male feminists] CAN actually get a feminist girl this way is the saddest part
they end up getting the crap girl and she makes his life a living hell from then after
Right, there are two ways a man can “get” a girl: expediently (she settles for him b/c she’s ugly or damaged and he’s in her orbit) or passionately (she swoons for him b/c his masculine energy is irresistible).
Men who “get” feminists expediently suffer for their laziness and cowardice. The bitter spiteful femcunt will unload every bubbling resentment she harbors onto one of these unlucky males, who will wind up in a minefield relationship spending most of the time dodging her incoherent rage and appeasing her increasingly lunatic demands, all for a once-every-six-months perfunctory ball-dribbling into the shallow end of her dry hole.
