The Sex Ratio Is Getting Worse For American Men

Here’s an animated map of the sex ratio in the US by county, during the time period 1990-2013 (h/t reader Agree&Amplify):

The blue shades are areas where the number of men exceed the number of women. The red shades are players’ paradises where there are more women than men.

As you can see, the transcontinental picture for American men is bleak. Blue areas are expanding their territory and luscious labia red areas are ceding territory.

Sex ratio is important. A good sex ratio will help optimize a man’s game.

But wait…

This map is woefully inadequate as a gash guide. Most egregiously, it doesn’t break down the female population by age. Who cares about the ratio of 60-year-old women to men? What matters is the 18-28 female demographic.

What about race? Most white men (and since we’re being honest, black men too) aren’t interested in panty raids of the lands where Shaneequa Law is operative (or soon to be). The South has a “good” female-to-male sex ratio, but you don’t see Mystery or Neil Strauss hitting up the Mississippi Delta club scene.

And the Hispanic invasion wave isn’t a poosy paradise for American men, either. Most of the 50 million migrants of the last few decades are squat oaxacas with zero sex appeal. It’s worse than that, because first generation migrants are skewed male.

Nonetheless, the map isn’t totally useless. It does show a widespread secular trend toward more men and fewer women. Even when extenuating variables are controlled for, it’s a decent bet that the population share of supple, 18-28 white women relative to all men has decreased, and this, naturally, has knockoff effects on the balancing of the sexual market. Young slender women, and especially young slender white women, have always been the bottleneck to romantic pleasure, but now that bottleneck is squeezing tighter. Obesity, invasion of the less attractive races, and other more obscure factors are jacking up the premium on slender white woman pussy. With every bottleneck squeeze, the thin white woman ego inflates by 50 psi. Is it any wonder that game — the art of applied charisma — is more necessary in America than ever before?

UPDATE

Jayman links to a map which breaks down the singles sex ratio by the crucial 20-29 year old age group. (Original post here.)

Not looking good. May as well rename America to SausageFestivania.

As jheymon notes, this is city data. The countryside may be better for men, although I doubt it. Sexy single rural women tend to flock to the cities in search of the alpha male of their dreams, leaving their towns pussy-parched.

Read Full Post »

First Principles

First principles are the bark of a man’s soul, in both senses of the word “bark”. Betray your first principles for expedient negotiation, and you’ll pay a costly tribute for your cowardice later.

Along this theme, commenter Trainspotter writes,

ho: “that anti white goyism isn’t the only thing at work”

It might as well be. Everything else pales in comparison, or is a mere offshoot of the essential anti-white nature of the current ruling orthodoxy. For example, the “war on men” is really a war on whites. The real target is white men, and more broadly Western civilization. That non-white men are also harmed is more collateral damage than anything else. They were never the real target.

To put it in, shall we say, less than scholarly terms, I’d order the importance of various issues more or less as follows: first and foremost, the racial issue. Then a pile of shit. Then another pile of shit. Then everything else.

That’s why leftists can tolerate dissent on almost any issue, save race. [ed: and feminist victimhood/empowerment (nevermind the contradiction)] Oppose any of their other pet projects, and sure, they won’t like you. But oppose them on the racial issue, and they go insane with hatred and rage. Their heads spin around and explode. And even when they go nuts on another issue, it’s almost always because it ties in with an important racial angle or consequence.

Race is the decisive point on the battlefield. That’s why when conservatives gave up on the racial issue a few decades ago, and re-branded themselves as “color blind,” the current fiasco was baked into the cake. Once the anti-whites won on that single issue, they were inevitably going to win on pretty much everything else, given time. And they have.

Separation is the only solution.

Well said. “””Conservatives””” abandoned their first principle when they caved to the lie of color blindness. Once they turned their backs on the truth of essentialist race differences, they doomed themselves to lose every battle to follow. In Heartistian terms, they tried to save their skins by sacrificing their scrotums. That never works. And, as history has shown since that seminal self-betrayal, and continues showing, the leftoid Hivemind juggernaut steamrolls the American culture and flattens it into its preferred shape: two-dimensional. The scalped ballsacks of their conservative suckups swing from lampposts against the gray skies.

It would’ve been the harder path for conservatives, but sticking to the first principle of the immutable disparities of the races would have spared a brighter future for the nation. They would not have spent the last six decades in the defensive crouch, squealing like stuck pigs.

Other first principles:

A government’s first principle is defense of the territory in which its citizens live and thrive, and guardianship of the borders against the invasion of races dissimilar from the race of the founding and creating native stock of the nation.

A man’s first principle as regards his interaction with women is to act as if he is spoilt for choice, even when his choices objectively fall short of limitlessness.

A woman’s first principle is to favor her procreative capacity over all other concerns.

Betray these first principles. and any short-term consilience won will in due time become corrupted, and then reconstituted by your enemies into spears aimed at your heart. Oftentimes, the spear will be wielded against you by your own hands.

Read Full Post »

The Difference Between Game And The Red Pill

Rivelino explains,

GAME is all the techniques and strategies to get better with women, including negging, cold reading, push pull, frame control, but also self improvement topics like working out, better posture, career development. the RED PILL, in contrast, is the deeper understanding that women are not sugar and spice and everything nice, that they in fact have a strong need to be sexually overwhelmed and dominated, that they are fundamentally emotional and childlike, that their concept of truth is not the same as that of men, and that their core nature is not to be loyal. the red pill teaches men to love and appreciate women as they are, not as we want them to be.

That’s about as clear and succinct a definition of the two value systems as I’ve read anywhere.

There is, of course, plenty of overlap between Game and Red Pill. It has to be, because the Red Pill is the child of its father, Game. Game came first and opened possibilities to explore human dynamics in a new and fresh way. In fact, the Game “worldview” predated the exact same Red Pill worldview. Most of the well-known and well-regarded Game tactics are grounded in Red Pillian (or, for you true old skoolers, evo psych-ian) theories about female nature. These theories received a thorough working-out in the field (see the old fastseduction.com forums for testimonials from tens of thousands of men over the past decade or two), and the experimental process was efficient at sorting the successful seduction strategies from all the competing hypotheses.

Not to butter my own whole grain bread, but I believe with oh-so-innocent earnestness that it was Le Chateau that first made the connection between Game and the wider culture.

Read Full Post »

How To Prevent A False Rape Accusation

Max from Australia writes,

“what’s the best strategy to prevent a FRA when leaving her place”

Borrow $10 from her in the morning – she will text you later that day asking for it back faster than the debt collectors at Mastercard….keep that text and give her back the $10 in a public place with CCTV..

Yes, saving text messages has proven to be an effective means of protection against malign women on the false rape make.

”or start prattling like a beta to make her want him to just go away and completely out of her life?”

Stage a fake Asthma attack and ask her to drive you to the hospital..you’ll never hear from her again.

Heh. As fun as this sounds, it’s also a lot of work just to prevent a low-risk FRA blindside. A cheaper — in terms of time and energy spent — alternative is to do the bare post-coital minimum of chivalrous behavior that would avert the disaster of sending psychologically fragile crazies over the edge into Regret Rape fantasia. That means, stick around until the morning. Don’t dodge out at 2AM. Tell her you had a great time, and you’ll keep in touch, even if you don’t mean it. Try to be careful about parading your other girl around the day after, if you all live in the same neighborhood. Don’t remind her that she was “SOO drunk last night.” Don’t hop on the video game console after you’ve jizzed in her general direction. And, most importantly, don’t get tangled up with nutty whores who religiously follow Lena Dunham on Twitter.

An ounce of prevention is worth a town of pound!

Read Full Post »

How To Identify A Slut: Ring Etiquette Edition

You can add another slut tell to the patented and first-of-its-kind Chateau Heartiste list of slut tells.

Commenter backchecking explains,

In my experience, gals are extremely aware of ring etiquette. A ring finger is raised like garlic to a vampire — or flashed to evidence availability. This tic comes largely from the subconscious.

In a similar vein, lots of cheap rings and bangles indicate a babe on the hunt. Only one finger will be flamingly naked.

The “ring finger glaring omission” slut tell is almost as reliable as the tramp stamp. A girl with multiple rings on multiple fingers except the one finger that advertises monogamous commitment is practically sending up a Snapper Signal to the city’s gine fighters. Dark knights will converge on that girl to give her the hero sandwich she needs, even if it’s not the hero sandwich she deserves.

Bonus slut tell!

If a girlfriend or wife suddenly requests that you wear a condom, she’s a slut… with another man. No doubt she’ll offer some lame excuse for the change in pound town policy, but don’t believe her. The “abrupt condom policy change” slut tell is evidence that a woman wants to block your seed to allow unobstructed passage of another man’s seed. If you are the other man, and a woman has suddenly permitted you raw god* rights of entry, practice due calendar diligence. Every player should become acquainted with his LTR’s ovulation cycle.

*Ed: This was originally supposed to read “raw dog rights of entry”, but I like the typo better.

Read Full Post »

Male Sexual Entitlement Is Attractive To Women

Male sexual entitlement – in its broader application, overconfidence – is attractive to women.

Here is an example of it in action (messages from girl on left):

Reader Blick Mang writes,

Please rewind to 2005, slap me in the face, and say “I fucking told you so.”

No further commentary required.

Thank you for it all.

You’re welcome.

Why do women love male sexual entitlement? It signals male status. What kind of man can afford to posture like a Lothario? What kind of man expects pussy to fall in his lap? That’s right, a high status man. A man, in other words, that other women want. Entitlement <-> status <-> female preselection. This is the wondrous feedback loop that traps vaginas in amplifying oscillations of raw tinglage.

As an exercise for newer readers, here’s the breakdown of Mang’s message game:

GIRL: …that is all I deserve?

MANG: We’ll have to see. 8===D

Instead of offering tributes to her achievement of being born with a vagina, Mang challenges her to make him a more generous man. The universal Dick Signal is, shall we say, none too subtle innuendo.

GIRL: sorry, that kinda puts me off blah blah i’m not that kind of girl.

Now, if Mang were a beta, he would’ve tried to appease this indignant girl right around here. Most betas, sensing that a monster is growing within the girl they love, promptly revert to Supplication&Appeasement mode. “I don’t expect that. I meant to call you earlier. I don’t think of you that way” etc. Mang wisely avoids this manipulative female beta bait.

MANG: Eating my jelly beans puts me off. 🙂

Tingles are born in the defensive crouch. Nice reframe. (Prolly could’ve dropped the winkie.) This one liner contains some powerful subcommunication that affects girls’ behavior. Its subtext says to a girl, “I’m not going to apologize for being a man, and if you go I won’t lose a wink of sleep.”

The girl sticks to her guns, but you can sense she’s weakening under the alpha onslaught.

GIRL: i deserve respect from you, even though i slept with you

Mang holds his frame.

MANG: See you tomorrow

Nice lack of punctuation.

GIRL: ok

Translation: Her pussy just exploded.

She’s defeated. Her euphoric defeat was so complete she mewled to see him a day earlier. Game recognized.

Read Full Post »

The Fat Daughter Vs Thin Mother Thought Experiment

Commenter natphilosopher poses an interesting thought experiment,

What I want to know is, what’s the CH translation factor [for female age versus female fatness]?
I figure, maybe 2-2.5 pounds/year?
A 20 year old who’s 50 pounds overweight against the same woman 20-25 years later, but now she’s lost the extra weight and toned up?

No, better yet, CH, they are both at the end of the bar. It’s the middle of nowhere, so there’s no other action and your stationed here for a while. The newly divorced mother, toned and horny, and the overweight but otherwise hot daughter and two of her overweight friends. The mother is so hot for her age, which is 39, that under the circumstances she appeals to the mighty CH. How many pounds per year does the daughter have to be overweight for the Mom to win CH’s attention?

The variables:

39-year-old mom, slender and toned.

VERSUS

20-year-old daughter, 50 pounds overweight.

Which woman commands not just CH’s turgid attention, but most men’s attention (since the vast majority of men share the same preferences in women)?

In other words, how much fat has to accumulate on a prime nubility young woman before a height-weight proportionate woman twice her age begins to look like a more sexually alluring prospect?

Reminder: Presented with two equally slender women 20 years apart, most men will, given a free choice, choose the younger woman for sex AND love. (yes, both)

The formula is simple: Youth >>>> Cougardom, at a healthy body weight, every time. It gets complicated when we fiddle with the variables and compare a young fatty to an older, age-adjusted hottie.

Thinking hard about this (because neither cougars nor fatties are sexual fantasy material), I conclude that the thin mom would earn the CH rod of approval. Youthful bloom, rare and exquisite as it is, can’t withstand 50 pounds of disfiguring blubber. Wrinkles and sag are no man’s idea of boner-fuel, but the equivalent of Lindy West is like the anti-Viagra: Boners implode into a black hole of flaccidness, from which no seed can escape.

I’d therefore have to agree with natphilosopher’s mathematical elegance: A 20-year-old daughter would have to be 2.5 lbs per year fatter than her 39-year-old mom. But only if her mom is already thin. If the daughter is 50 pounds fatter than her obese mom, that’s a dirigible sideshow no one wants to contemplate puncturing.

50 pounds of superfluous fat is a lot of unsexxxy BBBBBBBBW adipose. What if the daughter is, say, 40 pounds heavier than her twice-as-old slender mom? 30 pounds? 20?

At 40 pounds difference, most men would still opt to bang the thin mom with the extra 20 years.

At 30 pounds difference, the pattern of fat accumulation on the daughter will start to matter. Did her additional 30 pounds settle on her ass and tits, and avoid her face, neck, belly and arms? Then I conclude that even numbers of men would choose the daughter and the mother.

At 20 pounds difference, the same as above applies, but now the daughter’s sheer youthfulness exerts a powerful influence on men’s autonomic desires. Most men will overlook an extra 20 pounds on a 20-year-old if the only alternative is sex with a thin 39-year-old (again, presuming equal facial attractiveness, i.e. bone structure).

At 10 pounds difference, the daughter wins nearly every time.

I hope this answer has cleared up everyone’s questions on the matter of female fatness and female age and their deleterious, and synergistically deflating, effects on men’s libidos.

Read Full Post »