The Myth Of The Prep School Chad Sex Predator

Some commenters said the photo I had linked here wasn’t of CBF, so I deleted it. The points made in this post remain in tact, though, because they are universal and separate from any specific case. I changed the post title to reflect this change as well, that this is a post about sex, lies, and Congressional testimony.

The funniest aspect of this charade is that Brett Kavanaugh isn’t even a Chad. He barely brushes up against Chad-dom. But Ballsy-Fraud was such a forgettable dogface back in her wilted salad years, that a sackless wonder like John Scalzi would have seemed like a catch to her.

I’m not being glib. Sexual assault (and rape) are about sex. Not power. As with everything feminists claim, take the complete opposite as closer to the truth. There is real SCIENCE to back this up, too.

Physical power is only the means lsmv male rapists leverage to achieve their ends: sexual relief. This is relevant to Ballsy-Fraud’s looks; a young man who hung out with the cool dudes in high school wouldn’t look at, let alone date, a homely chick like teenage CBF. Nor would he be the rapist type; those cool dude Chads that rile up feminists are already enjoying enough consensual female company that they don’t need to violently wrest it from women.

This is especially true during the high school and college years when young men cling to the highest standards in women.

In real life, actual sex assaulters and rapists are soy-laced weirdos and losers and creeps and scary-looking uruk-hai who target good-looking young women (especially if, like Weinstein, the assaulter has status and power which is attractive to pretty young women and pulls them into his orbit for more convenient assaulting) or at least target women who would normally be way out of their league in a legitimate courtship scenario. That astronomically disproportionate black-on-White FBI rape statistic? Most of those perps wouldn’t get a first glance from their White woman victims in a non-rapey context.

Sex assaulters (less so, rapists) also will target slutty women — ie women who look easy and would put out quickly. Sometimes, this means the assaulter “slums it” with a less attractive but good-to-go girl. Darwinian trade-offs. Sperm is cheap, and can be spread more widely, with less attention to quality control.

These slutgirls signal, often consciously, their sluttiness through skimpy dress or erotic mannerisms. That doesn’t mean the girls are “asking for it”, but they are certainly asking for lots of aggressive male sexual interest. Sluts often invite the sexual “trauma” they insist they try to avoid, and they know it deep down. It’s how they compete against better-looking girls who can get men without acting slutty.

The slut-assaulter dynamic is different in one crucial aspect from sex assaults involving non-slutty women: usually, the interaction starts consensual, but ends nonconsensual, when either the slut has mid-grope second thoughts or the assaulter gets too ornery because his horny level hit the red zone and he becomes careless about how he progresses toward his coital goal.

Most gropers will pull back when the slut puts out a strong, unmistakable signal to stop. That’s why sexual assault in this scenario rarely escalates to real rape (as opposed to regret rape). But if a few minutes of unwelcome groping happens between hookup and second thought, then the slut will feel “used” when she’s had time afterward to stew in her resentment.

This is what I suspect happened to CBF in high school, who was by contemporaneous accounts quite the cock hunter. She had some distasteful slutgirl experiences back then that she slotted Brett Kavanaugh into when operatives in the Deep State needed her to deep-six a Trump nominee.

None of this is to say her current accusation against Kav isn’t a total fabrication. She made it all up, but the creaky foundation supporting her lies may have been remembrances of awkward hookups with random boys, as a braces-wearing high school teen very insecure about her desirability but saddled with the libido of a masculinized woman. Or, recollections of family abuse. And all of the memories muddied by her heavy drinking (which was apparently rampant at these ’80s era prep schools).

***

A Gabber [name redacted in the interest of post-America survival] has this to say about what was likely Ballsy-Fraud’s underlying motivation to publicly thrash an innocent man with a false grope accusation.

here’s the truth: most women who go around talking about being a “survivor” of rape are lying

and pretty much every college chick who says she was raped but her rapist is still allowed on campus is a liar

she was never raped
she’s just mentally ill

and she’s blaming her mental illness (which often strikes in college) on some imaginary trauma from a boy she fucked

40% of rape accusations made to the police are fake

and the % of fake accusations is even higher for “rapes” that were never reported

some chick who just abstractly claims she was raped at some vague time in high school or college is most likely lying

she’s either mentally ill or just wants the Victim Points she can get by claiming to be a “survivor”

half these chicks are claiming to be “survivors” of awkward one night stands

it’s really not that big of a deal
you really weren’t that traumatized

you sucked a dick and let some guy you barely know fuck you

and now you feel used and gross
because you were used and you are gross

but it’s really not that big of a deal

just stop being a whore
and you’ll feel a lot better

a big part of this is Mental Illness

severe mental illness often strikes in late teens, early 20s — ie, during College

a lot of these chicks are just, sadly, experiencing the start of what will be a  lifelong crippling mental health problem

it’s very sad, but we can’t let them destroy all of society just cause they got a head full of bad wiring

a big part of the insanity of the Left is the de-stigmatization of Mental Illness

also the Internet just allows a lot more ppl to participate in Society

in the past if you were a nutter, pretty much only your family would have to deal with you

but now the Internet lets you infect the rest of the planet

a normal woman will feel bad about her one night stand but not be emotionally crippled by it for the rest of her life

the Walk of Shame is something a lot of chicks do in college

Feminism says we have to totally re-order Society so no one ever feels that Shame

but most women at some point realize, hey, maybe if i stop acting like a Whore, i’ll feel less Ashamed of myself

modern Rape Hysteria has a lot do with Mental Illness

ppl with serious Mental Illness rarely accept that, hey, they just got some bad luck and some loose wires in their head – they want an explanation, they want to be able to say, aha!, that’s why i’m crazy

so they go looking for Trauma

and Feminism says, ah, it was that awkward one night stand you had freshmen year

so these girls who are starting to lose control of their minds now have a handy excuse – some guy felt up my boob once at a party

the reality is they were probably always gonna go crazy

if anything, what might have set them off was moving away from home and living around a bunch of strangers in a high stress environment

but it probably woulda happened regardless

Bolded parts are the money shots. Miswired slores go looking for trauma to explain their behavior, never able to admit to themselves that they are the cause — that is, that “society” isn’t to blame — of the psychological problems following them through their lives.

Here’s another slut cold ugly truth — women who got their tits drunkenly groped in high school aren’t traumatized by it. Women have an inbred capacity to absorb some clumsily aggressive male gropings without losing their minds. It’s a resilience evolved from wanting to be near assertive alpha males.

So let’s stop infantilizing women and stripping them of any agency or accountability.

Another reader,

Much more likely daddy molested her as a child, her mind suppressed it to keep her sane, some point, she was in a session with a shrink, or while being trained to be one, and false memories of being groped in high school replaced the real memories of daddy, as excuse why she slept with 64+ guys.

That’s a real possibility, and it could explain why Ford’s immediate family has been notably absent and unwilling to corroborate or defend her. (Today, one family member told reporters that Ballsy-Fraud “threw her best friend [Leyland Keyser] under the bus” when she said Keyser had health issues as the reason Keyser wouldn’t vouch for CBF’s lie. So I wasn’t the only person to notice that psychocunt maneuver in CBF’s testimony.

PS If you want to know why CBF thought she could get away with lying under oath in the course of destroying a good man’s reputation on a national stage, this is your answer:

CBF knew she’d be protected from exposure by the Creep State, Chaimstream Media, and Democortez apparatus. And she is still being protected by them, when she should be tried for perjury and sued for slander.

PPS After “Succubus” Feinstein read the latest FBI report essentially exonerating Kavanaugh, she left the room looking like she had seen a ghost (or Jesus). That’s not depression or resignation; that’s fear. I wonder what was in that report?

PPPS A pithy comment from Aaron that provides historical context:

Read Freud’s seduction theory. Every woman brought up memories of sexual abuse during therapy, and Freud had to abandon his theory because it was improbable that all fathers molest their daughters. We’ve known about this type of neurosis for over 100 years, but feminism has taken over psychology so it is politically incorrect to study the dark side of female sexuality (e.g. sexual masochism makes women wet).

This blog is unafraid to discuss the dark side of female sexuality, which may be why feminists and their soy lackeys rarely muster the will to come here and take on my arguments with anything more than vapid ad hominem.

Read Full Post »

YOU MUST BELIEVE

Christine Blasey Ford said she “would be prepared to testify next week,” so long as senators offer “terms that are fair and which ensure her safety.” – New York Times

“terms that are fair and which ensure her safety” = she gets to freely slander a good man, no questions asked. Please clap.

A reader notices,

Yesterday the Democrats said “she must be believed!” not just heard. They are literally trying to shut down ANY questions into the accusations. They are literally demanding that the world simply BELIEVE all of it.

This is the leftoid M.O. about every other tenet of their idiotic anti-white equalism religion. It’s a totalitarian update on declarations of faith.

We’ve gone from:

THESE ARE THE FACTS

to

I WANT TO BELIEVE

to

I WANT YOU TO BELIEVE

to

YOU MUST BELIEVE

Next stop:

NON-BELIEVERS IN THE NEVER-WRONGNESS AND SAINTLINESS OF WOMEN WILL BE SHOT AT DAWN

Big Taint Taleb has said the false accuser of a crime should be subjected to the same prison sentence that her victim would have received. This would remove the moral hazard of unequal repercussions for the accused and the false accuser. Quim in the game.

A significant number of rape accusations are fabricated (or, charitably, “misremembered”). The number varies anywhere from 40-60%. FBI and DOJ and State level court case stats paint a startling picture of female mendacity. An even higher number of sexual assault accusations are false. Women sometimes lie, deal with it. And the way a healthy society deals with it is by making the punishment equal for accused and false accuser alike. The rate of FRAs would dry up overnight.

It’s a perfectly just solution. If a rape conviction can land a man in jail for a decade and ruin his reputation for life, then the false rape accuser should suffer the equivalent punishment. Only in Clown World is this sensible position deemed misogynist hate speech.

“You must believe.”

“But she waited 30 years to dump this flimsy accusation in the news. It reeks of a political hit job.”

“YOU MUST BELIEVE”

“But she’s lying.”

“YOU

MUST

BELIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVE”

“No”

“AAAAAAAAAUUGH WHERE’S MY SAFE SPACE, DEMONETIZE THIS MISOGYNIST! REFUGEES WELCOME! RAPE IS RAPE. RAPE WINS BANSHEE BANSHEE”

ps tangentially related, it’s time to play “count the kippahs”:

While you’re eyes-deep in this horror show, count the weirdly colored hair and pussyhats too.

Read Full Post »

¡SCIENCE!: Sluts Really Are Asking For It

The Chateau is no longer an outpost in a dark world. The dark world is an outpost of the Chateau.

File under: Ladies, if you act like a slut, you’ll be treated like a slut.

Subcategory: Liberal women, rape fantasies, and the PoundMeToo SMV signaling hysteria: A Theory of Femme.

Via Steverino:

Why Are Liberal Women More Likely to Report They’ve Been Sexually Harassed?

On Twitter, a guy calling himself Zach Goldberg does these amazing long tweet data dive explorations of hot topics. For example, he has a new one inquiring into why liberal women are more likely to report being sexually harassed than conservative women.

I don’t think he has yet ruled out all other reasonable explanations. For example:

– Liberal women turned liberal because they were sexually harassed. […]

But Goldberg has come up with a barnburner of a correlation I’d never heard of before, which you can read here.

Reposting the Twatter thread here:

Since then, I've gathered enough data to generate a longitudinal trend line to determine a) whether the high % of women reporting sexual harassment is historically unprecedented; and b) whether liberal women are consistently more likely to report experiences of sexual harassment

— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) August 31, 2018

The whole thread is worth reading (I’m sure AE would be interested in this treasure trove of sexual market data, given that it was largely pulled from the GSS).

Lascivious Summary: Liberal women are more likely than conservative women to report being sexually harassed, because liberal women are more likely than conservative women to have erotic rape fantasies (i.e., women tingle when they think about being forced to have nonconsensual sex).

Most women have “forcible sex” erotic fantasies, but overeducated liberal women really run with it. And remember, fantasies are based on real desire. If they weren’t, by the property of randomness we would hear of women having sex fantasies about beta males. They don’t.

Other findings: Alcohol and working in an office where one is alone with a lot of relatively alpha male bosses are somewhat predictive of the likelihood of reporting being the “victim” (sneer quotes now backed by hard data) of sexual harassment.

But…

number of sex partners + rape appeal appear to be doing most of the heavy lifting. Unfortunately, this data set did not include a measure of ideology; but the effects of Party ID point in the ‘Democratic’ direction.

I’m working up to something, bear with me.

Another finding: The data don’t necessarily show an increase in workplace sexual harassment in the PoundMeToo era (roughly the past two years); what it shows is an increase in *reports* of sexual harassment. Media saturation coverage of isolated sexual harassment stories grabs women’s attention and motivates them to jump on the sexual harassment victim bandwagon.

That said, considering some of the other media effects I’ve previously shared in the context of perceived discrimination, I do think it’s at least plausible that the salience of the issue in the media–and the concomitant prestige/sympathy that awaits those who claim victimhood–produces these sudden upward swings in the reporting base rate.

In other words, the ‘real’ base rate–i.e. what the average person (i.e. not gender studies majors) would consider sexual harassment–has remained relatively stable overtime, but that media salience + the broadening of the definition (to include even innocuous or unintended behavior) encourages a kind of ‘identity-expressive’/socially motivated reporting.

Propaganda works (especially if the recipients of it are psychologically predisposed to accept the premises of the propaganda because parroting it would increase their social and/or sexual status). In sum, the Chaimstream Media has weaponized the minds, bodies, and souls of our White women.

So here we go with my Theory of Femme. Women are natural attention whores, and shitlib women are the biggest attention whores. As a woman becomes more conservative, she is less interested in attention whoring.

Media propaganda feeds into women’s natural conformism; their need to be socially accepted by the dominant in-group. For shitlib women, this means conforming to shitlib fads, like PoundMeToo. Combine women’s conformism with their attention whoring and media coverage, and you get sexual harassment moral panics.

Furthermore, the attention whoring is really a sexual market value display. Women who claim to be sexually harassed by men are implying that they are so desirable men can’t control themselves in their company. Shitlib women who dream of being erotically raped would, naturally, boost their SMV signal by casting themselves as victims of rape-y men. SMV signaling is reward enough, but shitlib women also get a…tingle…in their nethers when they imagine themselves in the role of the overcome woman who had no choice but to give in to the brutish alpha male.

Here’s the catch: most shitlib women work in fields where they are surrounded by flappy-wristed soyboys and supplicating male feminists. These are not the men erotic rape fantasies are made of. The PoundMeToo cyclical sexual panic can best be seen, then, as a sexual wish fulfillment hysteria coupled with a disgust for the weak males who by convenient proximity would be unwittingly enlisted to play the role of the irresistible, dominating, self-entitled alpha male. Women hate that these soft males are their “fantasy fuel”, so when one of these soys makes an innocuous gesture that can be misinterpreted by a battlecunt with a chip on her shoulder as sexual harassment, they get taken to the she-shed for the requisite social shaming and livelihood destruction.

And now we know why single White women with college degrees — nearly all of them shitlib — signal so hard for open borders to the Brute World. Maybe they aren’t signaling. Maybe…juuuuust maybe….these shitlib chicks want more aggressive men to fill in for the role of the rapist hunk of their deepest starkest sexual fantasies.

That is my Theory of Femme. Someone notify Jordan Peterson and see what he thinks.

In other common sense news, it takes two to tango. If a girl dresses slutty and acts slutty, men will (often enough rightly) assume she is DTF. The failure to communicate only occurs when the slut gets the expected solicirations from betas she’d rather not entertain. This mismatch between endeavor and reward brews toxic spite in sluts, who take it out on all men, making themselves less commitment-worthy with each year closer they careen to cat ladydom.

Read Full Post »

Bourdain’s Bane

The late Anthony Bourdain’s girlfriend, Hapsburg ho Asia Argento…

…didn’t wait long to throw the barely cold body of her former lover under the bus when she claimed he was the one who pushed her to make a hush money payout to her underage loverboy. #YouToo?!

Those dead beta males…useful in a pinch when a psychoslag narcissist wants to burnish her public image and shift blame.

Argento, for those who don’t know, was one of the leading wights in the PoundMeToo movement, a first accuser in the Weinstein scandal. Now she’s hoist by her own poontard. And Harvey himself has called her a hypocrite. He may be a sleaze, but he’s not wrong. He was just a sleaze surrounded by sleazy women who enabled his sleaze. Infinite sleazeback loops.

Bourdain is emblematic of so many contextually alpha men who in their souls are still anxious, nipple-latching, outcome-dependent betaboys who can’t or won’t play the playettes. Soulless cunts like Argento feast on these types. And it’s not exactly a one-way street. Bourdain gets to tap ass that a non-famous Bourdain likely never touches.

Bourdain killed himself because he was distraught that his lover Asia Argento was a serial cheater who was probably cheating on him with 17yo boys. Bourdain’s Pain is existential; a tragic figure who didn’t fly too close to the sun…he flew straight into it. Happily. Suicidally.

It’s just another dreary dispatch from Clown World.

Read Full Post »

The Phenomenon Of Heedless Hos Cheating On Hard Men

Damn Crackers wonders,

What’s with all these chicks cheating on their MMA boyfriends? Didn’t some dude land in jail for beating up his porn star cheating girlfriend?

Good question! Have the immutable laws of attraction been revoked?

NO. What we have here is a penumbra of those laws. A labial efflorescence, if you will.

How is a hard man victimized by a heedless ho? Sometimes men get duped. It happens, especially to men who experience sudden fame and cash in their inflated SMV chips for a sexy HBharlot they can’t properly handle.

Some hard men are hard only on the outside; their ignorance of female nature and clumsy relationship management, missing red flags left and right, betrays an Inner Beta. These men are the perfect cat’s-paws of manipulative minxes, who use them for the “leader of men and crusher of my enemies” thrill and who exploit their gullibility and blindness to women’s soulless sexual natures.

Likewise, hard men often attract schizoid sexpots who can’t decide which flavor of alpha male they want, so these chicks wind up fucking around to satisfy an ever-shifting panoply of tingle permutations. These are the r-selected sluts who flit from cock to cock, depending on mood. One day it’s MMA fighter, the next it’s brooding artist.

(A wag asks, “What’s a K-selected slut?” It’s the difference between a nice buzz and vomiting on the sidewalk.)

Then there are the HBsociopaths, designed by God for fucking all night and into the day, their lithe bodies and sweet aroma releasing a man’s animalfuckpower to prowl a 48 hour bender tearing them up from the inside. These psychocunts love to fuck hard men, and they love to test the limits of their intoxicating feminine power by fucking around on hard men. How far can she push it with a man who could snap her neck? The mystery embedded in that question energizes her hamster-clit-vaj Bartholin’s axis until it is oscillating with Pure Sploogery.

Finally, hard men typically don’t have a soft switch. They’re hard, all day every day. Women who hook up with hard men can begin to yearn for a more romantic touch as the hardness pile drives her into a predictable persiflage or overbearing cavebanter.

I think that about covers it. Still, it’s better to be a betrayed hard man than a loyally bound soft beta, because at least as the former you’ll get to Pound Town with a hottie, even if Pound Town has weak border security.

Read Full Post »

Caught Your GF Cheating. What Do You Do?

Wisely, you could videotape her treachery so you don’t have to listen to hours of her insulting denials:

Lmao my girlfriend just cheated on me in real life pic.twitter.com/MW9b6ehcWg

— TJ Laramie (@laramietj) August 19, 2018

Not always, but often enough, when a man acts blasé upon discovering his gf cheated on him, it means he’s got side pieces and doesn’t care very much about his primary’s fidelity. Or, he could be a stone cold chronicler of slore perfidy, a man of focused mind and icy blood, who knows videotape evidence utterly exonerates him in the court of social opinion and ruins his whore’s reputation with any man worth having and with any woman worth befriending.

Cast to the cock holster wastelands, is she.

A twatterer asked TJ Laramie (a UFC fighter) why he didn’t smash the interloper male. His reply,

This video was worth way more than a charge

In Current Year Clown World — aka our dysfunctional Gynarcho-Tyranny — Laramie is right. This was the smart play. Public humiliation of a whore > State sponsored punishment for defending one’s property from an invading force.

Some understand the nature of the game:

You went about it correctly. Unless this guy knows you personally the anger needs to be placed on the person in connection with you.

***

When that dude walked in the house he knew another man lived there.

***

So did she.

Touché.

Realtalk that will upset the White Knight Wünderdorks: when a ho cheats, she owns the infraction. None of this “oh but he seduced me” or “he took advantage of me in a weak moment” crap. This is the dawning of the Age of Awakening. Men who are the least bit clued in to the rough and sleazy nature of Woman know that ye faire maidens are neither, and will willfully, voluntarily, gleefully cheat if circumstances and plausibly deniable hamster-fueled PR align for sexploitation.

Every man’s cold rage should primarily be directed at his cheating ho, secondarily at the cheating ho’s accessory to the gine crime. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, it’s always been that women exert ultimate control over who gains entry and who doesn’t, and women are especially and zealously discriminatory in their governance of that control.

So when a woman cheats, she meant to cheat, and she could have stopped herself at any moment leading up to the act. Laramie beating up the male accessory, while surely satisfying his primal urge for revenge, would have, absent complementary punishment of his ho, indirectly relieved her of some measure of guilt and agency, and established the peculiar precedent that whatever shit she pulls going forward will be met with his feeble anger deflated by depletion on the relatively more innocent party to the treachery.

Read Full Post »

As Night Follows Day

Max Woke quips,

I’m sensing a sexual assault charge in this weasel’s future.

His accuser will be the boybody slut standing to his left, while he will wish his accuser was the redeemable redhead two slores down.

If you barged through that herpes wall, groping everything in your path on the way through, would they even have grounds to complain? You’re self-avowed sluts, what’s the problem?

(i only partly keed, because it takes two to tango, and if women want to be treated like porcelain objects no man shall brush against then women have to fulfill their end of the deal and not walk around in camel toe shorts baring their floppy tits while demanding white knight protection and lesser males to avert their gaze on punishment of psychological castration.)

Male chivalry doesn’t exist in a vacuum. One sex’s duty requires the other sex’s duty.

Read Full Post »