Lindsey Graham, Huma Abedin, And The Generals

This eye-opening video wound its way to me via TOG, the internet’s moast riveting poaster.

Anyone up for a nation-saving body language analysis?

The clip is from Juan McAmnesty’s funeral service (MPC wags call it a FUNeral). Lindsey Gayham gets cozy with More Huma Than Human Abedin, while Generals Mattis and Kelly keenly watch from a few feet away. At the end, Kelly looks to have passed a nonverbal signal to Gayham.

The critical moment starts around 1:12. Kelly’s lingering stare is not a friendly expression. It’s an alpha male dominance move. Gayham knows Kelly is staring at him, and Gayham reacts sheepishly, looking away, then glancing back briefly to see if Kelly still had eyes locked on him (he did, and Gayham, noticing this, fusses with his jacket like a nervous beta bitchboy).

YOU GOT ALPHA’D

I also detect a very quick nervous glance from Huma toward Kelly as she walks past him.

A few questions come to mind.

First, what the living hell is Huma doing at Songbird’s FUNeral? She should be in jail, not cavorting with establishment elites. How many of those unsecured classified emails Hillary was forwarding to the Chicoms were on Huma’s husband’s laptop that the FBI never bothered to look at? Oh, right, 30,000, give or take a few thousand.

“IF HE WINS, WE’LL ALL BE HANGING FROM NOOSES!!” — thecunt, presciently.

Second, why is Gayham so friendly with Huma, thecunt’s rumored longtime lesbian lover? To which party again is he supposed to belong? Remind me.

Third, did Kelly send a signal to Gayham, or was it just a coincidental itch that needed scratching? If it was a signal, was it a cue to activate a sequence of Deep Fried State events? Was the signal one between furtive allies or between enemies? If the former, what did it mean? If the latter, was it a warning to Gayham that Kelly has all the facts and a storm is about to blow back hard on anyone still keeping relationships with Hillary universe lackeys?

Gayham has been surprisingly charitable toward Goad Emperor Trump lately. He’s largely dropped the anti-Trump cucking. /ourgay/? Or did someone from Trump’s orbit have a talk with him about the shit that was set to hit the fan, possibly implicating Gayham in the splatter?

That’s my take, judging from the body language in this video. Gayham knows that Kelly knows, and Abedin doesn’t know. A big change in Swamp standard operating procedure is on the horizon; Huma might be doom’ed, and Kelly is signaling to Gayham that if he doesn’t cooperate, the cleansing fire will be licking at his plush pedoface too.

Discuss.

***

It’s topical, so I’ll chime in. The JYTimes cuck-anon is:

a. wholly made up by their editorial board (40% chance)
b. piss pimp nevertrump headcase loser Rick Wilson catfishing as a “senior Trump official” (30%)
c. a real person who has admitted the Deep State exists and is actively engaged in sedition against a duly-elected President. (30%)

Pro-tip: the punishment for seditious conspiracy is up to twenty years in jail. Make it happen, AG Sessions.

Read Full Post »

What’s The Matter With White People?

A reader asks,

Oh wise CH, what the hell is the matter with Europeans, what makes them so deeply cucked? More specificity, why do the Brits, Germans and Swedes all choose female heads of their states hell-bent on leading them to their destruction?  There must be something subtle here I’m missing.

By a quirk of evolution. NW Euros (and perhaps only NW Euros, extending to their diaspora cousins) acquired an exquisitely fine-tuned feeling of empathy that toxically commingles with their compulsion to psychologically project their hyper-domesticated moral sense onto others, which in a Diversitopian nightmare means emotionally identifying with people who are nothing like them and who laugh at their naiveté.

Complementary hypothesis: Prosperity has made White shitlibs decadently soft and mushy-headed, and they have become unable to see the day coming when they won’t have the luxury of virtue signaling for cheap social status anymore.

Same reader,

But they weren’t like this prior to end of WW2, no female heads of state and very few cucked male heads of state. What changed after WW2?

Lag time effect. The self-destructive seed was already embedded in NW Euros, it just needed time to germinate, grow, and yield fruity poz. Oh, and YKW were highly concentrated fertilizer.

Read Full Post »

Leftoids Can Dish It Out, But They Sure Can’t Take It

I wonder if the perky titted Khan balloon was made/sponsored by the same group that made the Baby Trump balloon. The style looks similar.

Related, word is that Nigel Farage, Britain’s Trump, is being bombarded with requests to run for Mayor of London. This NatPop revolution is just revving up. Shivtastic times ahead.

Read Full Post »

¡SCIENCE!: Sluts Really Are Asking For It

The Chateau is no longer an outpost in a dark world. The dark world is an outpost of the Chateau.

File under: Ladies, if you act like a slut, you’ll be treated like a slut.

Subcategory: Liberal women, rape fantasies, and the PoundMeToo SMV signaling hysteria: A Theory of Femme.

Via Steverino:

Why Are Liberal Women More Likely to Report They’ve Been Sexually Harassed?

On Twitter, a guy calling himself Zach Goldberg does these amazing long tweet data dive explorations of hot topics. For example, he has a new one inquiring into why liberal women are more likely to report being sexually harassed than conservative women.

I don’t think he has yet ruled out all other reasonable explanations. For example:

– Liberal women turned liberal because they were sexually harassed. […]

But Goldberg has come up with a barnburner of a correlation I’d never heard of before, which you can read here.

Reposting the Twatter thread here:

Since then, I've gathered enough data to generate a longitudinal trend line to determine a) whether the high % of women reporting sexual harassment is historically unprecedented; and b) whether liberal women are consistently more likely to report experiences of sexual harassment

— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) August 31, 2018

The whole thread is worth reading (I’m sure AE would be interested in this treasure trove of sexual market data, given that it was largely pulled from the GSS).

Lascivious Summary: Liberal women are more likely than conservative women to report being sexually harassed, because liberal women are more likely than conservative women to have erotic rape fantasies (i.e., women tingle when they think about being forced to have nonconsensual sex).

Most women have “forcible sex” erotic fantasies, but overeducated liberal women really run with it. And remember, fantasies are based on real desire. If they weren’t, by the property of randomness we would hear of women having sex fantasies about beta males. They don’t.

Other findings: Alcohol and working in an office where one is alone with a lot of relatively alpha male bosses are somewhat predictive of the likelihood of reporting being the “victim” (sneer quotes now backed by hard data) of sexual harassment.

But…

number of sex partners + rape appeal appear to be doing most of the heavy lifting. Unfortunately, this data set did not include a measure of ideology; but the effects of Party ID point in the ‘Democratic’ direction.

I’m working up to something, bear with me.

Another finding: The data don’t necessarily show an increase in workplace sexual harassment in the PoundMeToo era (roughly the past two years); what it shows is an increase in *reports* of sexual harassment. Media saturation coverage of isolated sexual harassment stories grabs women’s attention and motivates them to jump on the sexual harassment victim bandwagon.

That said, considering some of the other media effects I’ve previously shared in the context of perceived discrimination, I do think it’s at least plausible that the salience of the issue in the media–and the concomitant prestige/sympathy that awaits those who claim victimhood–produces these sudden upward swings in the reporting base rate.

In other words, the ‘real’ base rate–i.e. what the average person (i.e. not gender studies majors) would consider sexual harassment–has remained relatively stable overtime, but that media salience + the broadening of the definition (to include even innocuous or unintended behavior) encourages a kind of ‘identity-expressive’/socially motivated reporting.

Propaganda works (especially if the recipients of it are psychologically predisposed to accept the premises of the propaganda because parroting it would increase their social and/or sexual status). In sum, the Chaimstream Media has weaponized the minds, bodies, and souls of our White women.

So here we go with my Theory of Femme. Women are natural attention whores, and shitlib women are the biggest attention whores. As a woman becomes more conservative, she is less interested in attention whoring.

Media propaganda feeds into women’s natural conformism; their need to be socially accepted by the dominant in-group. For shitlib women, this means conforming to shitlib fads, like PoundMeToo. Combine women’s conformism with their attention whoring and media coverage, and you get sexual harassment moral panics.

Furthermore, the attention whoring is really a sexual market value display. Women who claim to be sexually harassed by men are implying that they are so desirable men can’t control themselves in their company. Shitlib women who dream of being erotically raped would, naturally, boost their SMV signal by casting themselves as victims of rape-y men. SMV signaling is reward enough, but shitlib women also get a…tingle…in their nethers when they imagine themselves in the role of the overcome woman who had no choice but to give in to the brutish alpha male.

Here’s the catch: most shitlib women work in fields where they are surrounded by flappy-wristed soyboys and supplicating male feminists. These are not the men erotic rape fantasies are made of. The PoundMeToo cyclical sexual panic can best be seen, then, as a sexual wish fulfillment hysteria coupled with a disgust for the weak males who by convenient proximity would be unwittingly enlisted to play the role of the irresistible, dominating, self-entitled alpha male. Women hate that these soft males are their “fantasy fuel”, so when one of these soys makes an innocuous gesture that can be misinterpreted by a battlecunt with a chip on her shoulder as sexual harassment, they get taken to the she-shed for the requisite social shaming and livelihood destruction.

And now we know why single White women with college degrees — nearly all of them shitlib — signal so hard for open borders to the Brute World. Maybe they aren’t signaling. Maybe…juuuuust maybe….these shitlib chicks want more aggressive men to fill in for the role of the rapist hunk of their deepest starkest sexual fantasies.

That is my Theory of Femme. Someone notify Jordan Peterson and see what he thinks.

In other common sense news, it takes two to tango. If a girl dresses slutty and acts slutty, men will (often enough rightly) assume she is DTF. The failure to communicate only occurs when the slut gets the expected solicirations from betas she’d rather not entertain. This mismatch between endeavor and reward brews toxic spite in sluts, who take it out on all men, making themselves less commitment-worthy with each year closer they careen to cat ladydom.

Read Full Post »

Diversity + Proximity = The End Of Free Speech

The timeless (and timely) CH maxim Diversity + Proximity = War includes the tacit rider that War can mean any sort of confrontation that doesn’t hit the bloodletting threshold. For instance, Diversity under one sociopolitical umbrella will inevitably result in, first, curbs on free speech and, finally, the gutting of 1A because the number and size of warring tribes won’t agree on the contours of a principle laid out, defended, and deeply felt by Anglo-Protestant White men, and the sphere of bannable “offensive” speech will enlarge to accommodate the sensitivities of increasingly antagonistic and thin-skinned groups all jockeying to acquire the power that will allow them to be the arbiters of which speech counts as “opposing viewpoint” and which is “hate”.

Today, nonWhites and leftoid Whites have allied to exercise full spectrum control over speech and to effectively silence any voices to the right of Shree Baboo. They rationalize their speech suppression with a glib retort that is effortlessly dismantled by Brendan O’Neill:

An MPCer adds a coda that is essentially a reiteration of the Diversity + Proximity = War equation,

Good statement from Brendan O’Neill. To expand on his idea a bit, there are linguistic and ethnic limits to the plausibility of free speech. Free speech as a way of life is communal and depends on conventions (many absorbed unconsciously from homogeneous communities) that lack the power to transcend the gulfs of racial and international difference. The only way to satisfy one-worlders and libertarians on the subject of free speech is to limit it in such a way that no individual is ever allowed to say anything with the potential to offend or hurt the feelings of any other individual, anywhere. Which is preposterous.

Free speech is under attack because the critical mass of its enemies is rising, or you could say that the minimum consensus of its champion is shrinking. It can’t survive without a solid majority of people who have in common a galaxy of shared assumptions about society and only differ about some questions around how society ought to operate. As it stands in America today, the plurality of worldviews being aggressively aired makes free speech anathema. The one worldview that would support free speech (basic Christianity) is the one that is of course ruthlessly suppressed.

The trend lines point to the dissolution of the Bill of Rights. America is only an abstract idea if that idea means the whole world gets to squat here and take a giant dump on Anglo-Protestantism and its codified Weltanschauung (the Constitution).

The two main problems facing free speech proponents trying to reconcile their principle with Mass Diversity are that diversity reduces trust even among Whites (and lower trust means greater suspicion of the intent of others’ speech) and different ethnic/racial groups have different notions about the form taken and value derived of allowable speech. These different notions aren’t alterable by the magic of assimilation; the contradictions go the bone, born before bred.

The backwash of all this Diversity (and virtue signaling for Diversity) is threatening to drown the very ideas that “America is an idea” cheerleaders claim to venerate. Our self-contradictory nation is tearing itself apart and the doxings, deplatformings, and demonetizations are the clearest evidence of it.

If American ideals are to survive, America must jettison its most recent and artificial idea that ideals are separable from blood.

Read Full Post »

A Murdered Daughter Is Just Another Dais From Which To Virtue Signal Vapid Equalism

Mollie Tibbetts, murdered by a foreign invader from Apocalypto, inspired this response from her grieving parents:

Sickening. I’m beginning to lose the capacity to fathom the White shitlib mind. They are so alien to me now.

Is it a genetic mutation? I find it hard to believe. Not that long ago, if a lovely young daughter was murdered by a churlish chalupa, the mother would silently grieve and the father would seek vengeance, personal or State-sponsored. What there wouldn’t be is an immediate recourse to universalist pabulum and a soiling of the dead daughter’s life, legacy, and memory to avoid social ostracism from crackpot shitlib peers.

Either the Globohomo Ministry of Anti-White Propaganda is far more powerful than even I, a hardened cynic, imagined, or something has gone seriously, irrevocably haywire with the brains of White shitlibs.

The shitlib ego is the most powerful force in the cosmos. I’ve said that, and I stand by it. But I didn’t want to believe it was so powerful that it would take its tribute from a violently slain daughter in the bloom of youth. And yet, here we see it has. The collective ego of Mollie’s family hungered, and her death became nourishment.

I would pity the family of Mollie Tibbetts if I didn’t despise them for dragging her still warm body through the misunderstood mud and sacrificially tossing it at the feet of the Diversity Cerberus. But, all I can summon is contempt.

“Evil comes in EVERY color”

True, but banal and disingenuous. Evil comes in some colors more than it does in other colors. And preventable evil — prevented by closing the borders to uncivilized lands — is the most tragic evil.

Contempt. Yet, here I am, still trying in my hopelessness to set Mollie’s family on the path of Truth & Beauty. They’re immune to my entreaties, to reason, but still I try. This nightmare has to have an end.

***

Pup comments,

I am surprised, after reading every comment here, that the term “cowardice” has not be raised once. I wonder, after having seen a few theories for the anti-white, self extinction death cult, if the answer is not just that the virtue signaling, “overly altruistic” whites are actually just chicken shit? Not unlike women of lands being conquered by invading armies, rather than fight and support their men, and risk their children being killed, they are bowing before their new masters and signaling their submission, without having fired a shot, hoping to be kept alive long enough to be the pet of the new rulers of their home land…

Any takers?

You’re right, and after publishing this piece my thoughts immediately wandered to pondering the sheer cowardice of leftoids who would rather intone supplicating anti-White pabulum at the funeral service of one of their murdered daughters than to rise up and shout a battle cry of vengeance against those who allowed our borders to be so wantonly disregarded and against the gruesome alien invaders who accepted the invite.

Read Full Post »

Will White Political Dispossession Precede White Demographic Dispossession?

If current political alignments within Team White can be linearly extrapolated into the future, then this comment by Zorost Zorost makes sense,

It is a great meme, but the implication isn’t quite accurate. Some whites vote anti-white, so long before whites are a demographic minority, whites will become a political minority.

The Brookings Institute estimates that 2028 is the last year a Republican can win the presidency, for example.

pg 35 summary graph
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/SOC2016report.pdf

I won’t pretend to clairvoyance, but I do have a pretty good grasp of human nature, and I predict that the trajectory of White political dispossession will stall, allowing time for White demographic dispossession to catch up, so that in the end a cataclysmic political inferno engulfs the US when Whites are roughly politically neutered at about the same time as they are demographically neutered.

And yes, this is taking into account the American nations, heritable ideologies, disparate outlooks and degrees of clannishness, differential intraWhite fertility, and runaway anti-White virtue sniveling.

My reasoning: shortly before Whites are forced into numerical minority status in their own homeland, a significant chunk of shitlib Whites will jettison their anti-White posturing and cross political boundaries in a last desperate act of survivalism. IntraWhite differences are real and lasting, but never before in American history (and possibly in world history) have skirmishing groups of Whites been pushed to the precipice of political and demographic annihilation by maximally alien nonWhite outsiders invited at the behest of rapacious White elites. We’re in uncharted territory. (Somalis aren’t your grandpa’s Irishmen.)

Briefly, the share of shitlib Whites in the US will shrink in proportion to the increase in the nonWhite US population, give or take a lag time of approximately a decade for the existential fear to snake its way to the White amygdalae.

Or: White Identity becomes more salient in a Dusky Diversitopia.

PS If I’m wrong, we’re all wrong, if you catch my drift.

PPS Cuckservatism, ladies and gents!

pic.twitter.com/38rYkgrZsr

— Philippe Lemoine (@phl43) August 16, 2018

Motto: “Born to Lose”

Read Full Post »