The Phenomenon Of Heedless Hos Cheating On Hard Men

Damn Crackers wonders,

What’s with all these chicks cheating on their MMA boyfriends? Didn’t some dude land in jail for beating up his porn star cheating girlfriend?

Good question! Have the immutable laws of attraction been revoked?

NO. What we have here is a penumbra of those laws. A labial efflorescence, if you will.

How is a hard man victimized by a heedless ho? Sometimes men get duped. It happens, especially to men who experience sudden fame and cash in their inflated SMV chips for a sexy HBharlot they can’t properly handle.

Some hard men are hard only on the outside; their ignorance of female nature and clumsy relationship management, missing red flags left and right, betrays an Inner Beta. These men are the perfect cat’s-paws of manipulative minxes, who use them for the “leader of men and crusher of my enemies” thrill and who exploit their gullibility and blindness to women’s soulless sexual natures.

Likewise, hard men often attract schizoid sexpots who can’t decide which flavor of alpha male they want, so these chicks wind up fucking around to satisfy an ever-shifting panoply of tingle permutations. These are the r-selected sluts who flit from cock to cock, depending on mood. One day it’s MMA fighter, the next it’s brooding artist.

(A wag asks, “What’s a K-selected slut?” It’s the difference between a nice buzz and vomiting on the sidewalk.)

Then there are the HBsociopaths, designed by God for fucking all night and into the day, their lithe bodies and sweet aroma releasing a man’s animalfuckpower to prowl a 48 hour bender tearing them up from the inside. These psychocunts love to fuck hard men, and they love to test the limits of their intoxicating feminine power by fucking around on hard men. How far can she push it with a man who could snap her neck? The mystery embedded in that question energizes her hamster-clit-vaj Bartholin’s axis until it is oscillating with Pure Sploogery.

Finally, hard men typically don’t have a soft switch. They’re hard, all day every day. Women who hook up with hard men can begin to yearn for a more romantic touch as the hardness pile drives her into a predictable persiflage or overbearing cavebanter.

I think that about covers it. Still, it’s better to be a betrayed hard man than a loyally bound soft beta, because at least as the former you’ll get to Pound Town with a hottie, even if Pound Town has weak border security.

Read Full Post »

The Diversitroid Fuggernaut’s Latest Tactic: Ostracize The White Male Leadership

When will Shanica Johnson be fired for anti-White bigotry? For her hate speech? Not holding breath. (If anything, the NewYidTimes will be calling her for a job interview.)

She seems a bit confused about the workings of miscegenation. If black men increasingly shack up with White mudsharks and make mystery meatballs together, that means fewer black men for black women, who have to find partners outside of their race or go to their morbidly obese, steatopygous graves lonely and prognathically bitter at the White men (or any men) who aren’t interested in relieving black women of their YASS INCEL status.

Second, middle aged White men are rapidly becoming a minority IN THE DEMOCORTEZ PARTY. The Trump Party (née Republican Party) will in reaction become a party predominately comprised of WHITE MEN and married White women who retain allegiance to Team White.

Then we will have the grounds established for Civil War 2. Beautiful.

The bigger picture here is a trend I’ve noticed taking shape in the past few months. The Diversitroid Fuggernaut and allied degenerate freak White leftists are attempting to drive a wedge between “middle aged White men” and all other Whites. They are beginning to wake up to the fact that being virulently bigoted against ALL Whites will blow up in their faces, so they’re massing their anti-White firepower against middle aged White men, the putative leaders of any nascent political movement that would more explicitly advocate for White interests. Their strategy is a simple one: ostracize established, effective White Men who are admired in their communities and natural born leaders of anything worth leading — i.e., make them “uncool” — and the splintered White factions awakening to their wholesale dispossession won’t have a strong, reliable, authoritative base of White men to effectively gel around in opposition to District N1g.

The Grotesqueries have convinced themselves that if Whites flee from any association with “middle aged White men” then there is nothing stopping nonWhites from terraforming America into an arab bazaar, a black ghetto, and a brown favela. A baghela (heh).

They may be right; but I suspect they have overlooked a powerful force cresting the horizon:

Generation Zyklon.

PS White men have to stop spending shekels on sportsball. It’s the only message these ingrates will understand. More precisely, it’s one of only two messages these ingrates will understand.

PPS Pointed comment from FastEddie,

Yep. Don’t know how many times I have to say it. Quit adding to the narrative that the n***ers are the cool kids. They’re not forbidden (that would set their panties on fire faster than the f*g from Twilight.) They’re just diseased, gross, and the only women who mud shark are jokes.

Turn off Afroball
Cancel Jooflix
Raise your own SMV personally, physically, financially
Do not bang mud sharks. Ostracize them.

If just 25% of White Men did this, at the very least, we’d bring afroball to its knees. (heh)

Glad you’re all my bros.
FE

Read Full Post »

Animal Farm, Trumperica Edition

In an Animal Farm set in the President Trump timeline,

the media would be… (Squealer the pig/the sheep)

the alt-right would be….(Benjamin the donkey)

the GOP cucks would be….(Boxer the horse)

antifa would be…(the dogs)

the globalist elite would be….(mr jones)

Heritage America would be…(the hens)

YKW would be….(too easy)

And Trump would be…?

Read Full Post »

Venus Logic Traps

During moments of pop media regurgitation, I have had White girlfriends say to me, a White man they were happily fucking and to whom they professed their love, that, in so many words, “White men are the problem with society”.

Try to wrap your head around that lawgic trap.

***

Atavator comments,

Heartiste, remember Larry Auster’s “3 person morality play” in liberalism? Good White, Bad White, Other. Just about every movie people watch follows this script. Shitlibs say this kind of crap so easily because they simply assume that YOU assume they’re putting you in the “good white/redeemer” category. And when they say “white men” are the problem, they mean someone… out there.

It’s a disgusting filthy lie of a worldview, but few women have the ability to think their way out of that programming, and would probably express surprise that you would even take offense.

A big part of what we all need to be doing is making people PAY in some way (even if it begins with disgust and anger) for parroting this loathsome garbage.

Perceptive. (RIP Auster) This is the mentality at work here. When women find out I’m very much the badwhite of their nightmares (defying their expectation of the form and style a badwhite should take)….well, they get a little hotter in the panty blotter!…even if long-term they must know it’s not gonna happen between us.

It’s evidence of a profound sickness in our culture when you really digest what’s happening here:

SWPL White girls are trying to connect with White men by slandering White men. In the twisted landscape of their damebrain, these chicks think that bashing BadWhites to a White man is romantic, an example of “shared values” that White girls need to feel with a man before they’re ready to receive his swarth-free seed.

That White chicks don’t even contemplate the possibility a White man will ever object is an extremely damning indictment of the SWPL White men who share their social strata: the girls are probably right; vanishingly few craven soyboys will ever call them out for their insipid anti-White posturing.

Until they meet a stone cold shivver like yours truly. A subversive who swims among them. A rebel right under their noses.

Batrachian writes,

Women relate to things on an inchoate, emotional basis. They don’t understand themselves, or what the fundamental drivers of their behaviours often are.

The same women that feel deeply offended by the very proposition of societal eugenics and hierarchy are also the first to be socially-Darwinian in their attitudes toward men.

CH Maxim #77: The fealty to equalism women signal is belied by the ferocity with which they sift and sort men in the sexual market.

Evolution likely saw to it that women would not be aware of their subconscious motivations, lest the fair sex lose the ability to dupe beta males (self-duping authenticates other-duping).

Complementarily, evolution saw to it that men would appease the Sexual Darwinism of women by avoiding any show of weakness or expression of emotional vulnerability…or die incel. Over the eons, men have been selected to indeed be less emotionally vulnerable because instinct usually trumps affectation.

Autarky writes,

[Women’s] biological programming is to avoid social exclusion. Only when white men are seen to be more powerful than the media will ‘their opinion’ change.

My quick rebukes may not have changed their opinions but it did shut their pieholes. For a spell. (My reply to anti-White virtue sniveling women is along the lines of “you have me confused with someone who will listen to your crap”. Or mouthlove.)

Batrachian again,

I’ve often wondered about the lack of self-awareness involved in this [White women signaling anti-White bona fides].

It’s understandable that they’re primarily acting out of fear (the west has become utterly isolating and tyrannical in a way that few are able to articulate) but I doubt anyone openly acknowledges this.

Is fear driving the epidemic of White women to posture against White men? Yes, if you believe that White women believe social ostracism is guaranteed if they don’t parrot the Anti-White Party Line. Something else is driving it, too.

Disgust.

SWPL, overeducated, over-employed, under-childed White women, for reasons I’ve explained at length in the pages of this blog, have become disgusted with their White men, the soyboys and bugmen and effete toadies and “Concorde-nosed moguls” who are their sexual market confederates. No man is standing up to them; worse, these low T lackeys are cheering on their race-traitor White women to ever greater depths of Hajnalian subversion of their shared homeland and culture. On a primal level, one has to wonder if shitlib White women are lashing out at their own weak men through the barbed tips of anti-White agitprop.

And why these same chicks flee to tumblrrhea to tell of how they relievedly surrendered to a proudly White MAGAman and were beginning to question everything they thought they knew about themselves.

Read Full Post »

The Sexual Market Gatekeeper Theory Of Political Affiliation

williamk’s signal-to-noise ratio is off the charts. Nearly every comment is COTW-worthy. Here he explains how the sexual market gatekeeper role of women and the marriage market gatekeeper role of men influences the politics of each sex.

An interesting interpretation of the data is that among college eds, White Men are watching the women for signals, that is they are only as conservative as they can be and still get laid. While among non-college eds it more likely the opposite, the women will be only as liberal as they can be and still get married.

In both cohorts, the gatekeepers (sex for college eds, marriage for non college eds) set the political trends. Of course, being a liberal doesn’t actually help you get laid, but this is a good take on the general pulse of what’s happening: When men are in control (marriage), women follow the men. When women are in control (sexual access), men follow the women.

This is a parsimonious theory for the ideological split we see between non-college White women and over-credentialed White women. Female college students are on the cock carousel life strategy (whether they actually ride or not is immaterial — the trajectory of their lives will follow a similar path to that of the sex and the city slut who rides all day and night). For these college girls — and note that college girls are dumber today than they were in the past, owing to the lowered admissions standards of McUniversities  — they are staring down the barrel of a decade’s worth of premarital sex. So their roles as sexual gatekeepers colors their interactions with men and their relationship to the State. College men, aka soyboys, will dance to the girls’ “welcome rapefugees” tune as long as they believe it gets them within the orbit of their nearest sex dispensary.

Non-college women, in contrast, have their eyes more strongly focused on marriage, because they can’t afford to blow a decade on cock hopping and mimosa brunches. They need a provider (a lot of the immiseration of the working class is a consequence of the lack of suitable provider males). Non-college women will therefore reflect the political views of their men to better sell themselves as marriage-worthy prospects.

A confounding factor to willamk’s theory is that ideology is partly heritable. It may be the case that women more interested in marriage and repulsed by the cock carousel lifestyle tend also to be more conservative in outlook. So college is filling up with the opposite — girls who aren’t as singularly focused on getting married and would prefer to monkey swing from soyboy to soyboy until latching onto a supergoy. Nevertheless, this gatekeeper theory of political affiliation is better than most I’ve read.

Executive summary:

Thirsty betas => shitliberalism
Desperate bachelorettes => shitlordism

I swear you’ll read more perceptive social analysis in one day on this blog than you’ll read in ten years at National Rejew.

FYI, williamk is the man who also introduced to this esteemed Chateau the concept of post-America liberalism as a “status cheating” strategy. Namely, as the nation has become more economically unequal, there are fewer avenues for striver SWPLs to gain real world, objective material and social status, so these locked out SWPLs turn to the raving lunacy of shitlibbery to gain unearned status by parroting anti-White pabulum. The solution to our shitlib problem may in part be returning to a more egalitarian (not “equal”) society marked by rising wages and less status whoring. Think anti-trust, tariffs, closed borders. So far, Trump is hitting two of three. I’m confident he’ll get around to the other one once all the GOPe cucks are jettisoned this November.

PS Do married White women continue voting like their husbands after years of marriage? If so, that would indicate a real shift in power dynamics in which married women mature into strongly identifying with their husband’s worldviews. If not, it would indicate there are social pressures pushing women to abdicate their marital duties.

Read Full Post »

Female Xenophilia As Revenge Fantasy

From Days of Broken Arrows,

“Runaway Maternalism Is Female Narcissism.” It’s worse than that. It’s a form of revenge.

Most runaway maternalism comes from the childless-and-single crowd. They misdirect those feeling onto things like pitbulls and refugees BECAUSE they know these very things will harm the innocent children of the happy couples they resent and despise.

You know that awful feeling men get when we see a stunningly beautiful woman we can’t have? Well, barren women get that feeling when they see the children they never had. The different is that “10s” are few and far between but babies are everywhere.

This is what makes The Barren Womb crowd more insidious than the male incel crowd. They mask their hatred as altruism.

The end.

It’s brutal ’cause it’s true.

I really do think though that this is a multifaceted problem, and that there are multiple, positively reinforcing psychological motivations behind female xenophilia and pathological maternalism. Many childless women, young and spinster, seek an outlet for their unfulfilled nurturing instinct, and find it in pit bulls, rapefugees, and border beanlets.

But DoBA is right; revenge plays into the sick compulsion as well. Single White women are bitter and are taking it out on normal, healthy White America. Trump is their lightning rod to “resist”. The solution is not to give these bitterbitches what they want; you don’t bargain with a vengeful woman who wants to make everyone as miserable as herself. The answer is to defy their screeching and break their spirits with a campaign of mockery and shaming. Only then will they be ready to submit to the will of their White men.

Read Full Post »

Comment Of The Week: Anti-Trump Hatred Is Anti-White Hatred

An astute comment from Ironsides earns him the coveted COTW,

“The odd part about the Trump Derangement Syndrome phenom is that so many jews revile the guy, but he is so in the pocket of Isra-hell at the same time.”

This was a puzzler to me as well, What I eventually decided might be the case — no idea if this is true — is that they’re not infuriated at HIM. They’re infuriated at US.

The entire media and government complex essentially ORDERED White Americans not to vote for Trump. White America disobeyed them and elected him anyway, with wildly enthusiastic crowds obliquely expressing a desire for racial/ethnic survival with chants of “build the Wall,” etc.

At this point, it doesn’t matter what Trump does from the viewpoint of the (((tribe))). He could give every jew in the US $1 billion and they’d still hate him, because they don’t really care about him. He is the symbol of our defiance to them, however rudimentary and quasi-subconscious it is in many cases. It’s that defiance which infuriates them — and terrifies them, which infuriates them even more.

Hence why International Shtetl organs like the NYBetaTimes are beginning to slip up and allow their unchecked fury at Trump (read: at White Christian America) to betray them, recently evident in their mishandling of the Sarah Jeong debacle. It’s harder to properly strategize and subvert a nation when you’re driven by fear and loathing to a pitched hysteria. Their desperation to maintain control of the horizontal and the vertical is making them sloppy. Anti-White Noise is leaking through the screen.

Ironsides is right. Anti-White hatred is channeled through Trump, which explains why the rage against Trump is so unhinged; (((they))) and their shitlib Gentile useful idiots who never met a phony virtue they didn’t want to signal correctly perceive in the phenomenon of Trump a resurrecting White consciousness and awareness of the malice that is directed against them.

Lashing out at Trump is a classic case of negative transference, in which Trump serves as the personalized stand-in for the hated White Heritage Americans who have shown a disturbing temerity to rise up and resist Globohomo propaganda demanding Whites accept their dispossession with good cheer.

As #TheDefiance movement grows among White Christians, the enemies of Heritage America become angrier and more terrified. Their hubris will mingle with their fear in a toxic emotional stew, and blinded by tribal rage they will be less willing to compromise, to cede rhetorical ground, or to step back from the cliff’s edge. Expect to see more heavy-handed censorship, more silencing and doxing of Defiers, more blindness to the growing threat of blowback, more unprincipled sophistry to scaffold a dying anti-White Narrative they are rapidly losing control over, and a quickening pace and saturation of increasingly brazen indoctrination in a frantic last-ditch effort to avert a loss in this existential war.

Read Full Post »