Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Tool Time’ Category

Clown World keeps delivering.

American Couple Believing ‘Evil Is A Make-Believe Concept’ Bike Through Territory Near Afghan Border. ISIS Stabs Them To Death.

A young American couple who took a year-long bike trip around the world, believing that evil was a make-believe concept, took a fatal route in Tajikistan near the Afghan border, where alleged ISIS terrorists stabbed them to death.

Jay Austin and Lauren Geoghegan, 29, quit their jobs last year in order to make their trip. Austin was a vegan who worked for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; Geoghegan, a vegetarian who worked in the Georgetown University admissions office.

Can shitlib self-parody implode into an astronomical singularity?

While in Morocco, Austin wrote:

You watch the news and you read the papers and you’re led to believe that the world is a big, scary place. People, the narrative goes, are not to be trusted. People are bad. People are evil. People are axe murderers and monsters and worse.

I don’t buy it. Evil is a make-believe concept we’ve invented to deal with the complexities of fellow humans holding values and beliefs and perspectives different than our own—it’s easier to dismiss an opinion as abhorrent than strive to understand it. Badness exists, sure, but even that’s quite rare. By and large, humans are kind. Self-interested sometimes, myopic sometimes, but kind. Generous and wonderful and kind. No greater revelation has come from our journey than this.

Inner Hajnal shitlib Whites have a problem reconciling the existence of evil in the world because the fact is that, at least by Western White society standards, evil disproportionately exists in nonWhite and nonWestern societies. So instead of accepting the premise of banal, routine nonWhite evil, shitlibs prefer to deny the existence of evil altogether. Or play games of sophistry and redefine evil as “badness” (as if differences of degree and kind don’t matter).

White shitlibs also have a problem with the logical concept of mutual inclusion. Goodness, kindness, and generosity of spirit can exist alongside evil. The existence of the former does not refute the existence of the latter.

And reader PA had a thing or two to say about how nonWhite hosts can be quite gracious to guests they know will be leaving their land soon, and that this graciousness misleads gullibly naive shitlib Whites to believe the rest of the world is as nice as they are (except to BadWhites).

It’s all so grating, the mix of condescension, sanctimony, paternalism, and callowness of the typical modren shitlib. “People, the narrative goes, are not to be trusted” What narrative? The one your people control? And, sorry to tell ya (which you know now in your travels through the illimitable void), some groups of people really are less trustworthy than other groups of people. “we’ve invented” Who’s “we”, kemosoyboy? “to deal with the complexities of fellow humans” Describe those complexities. You mean like, stabbing foreign travelers to death at the side of the road? “it’s easier to dismiss an opinion as abhorrent” Yes, everyone the shitlib disagrees with is an ignoramus. “than strive to understand it.” The shitlib is so understanding, you should listen to him.

Austin also had some contemptuous words for President Trump:

Apparently Jay Austin thought there was evil in the world, in the form of President Trump.

Then, on July 29, 2018, as they were riding their bikes with two other cyclists in Tajikistan, five men exited their car and stabbed all the bicyclists to death.

grainy cellphone clip recorded by a driver shows what happened next: The men’s Daewoo sedan passes the cyclists and then makes a sharp U-turn. It doubles back, and aims directly for the bikers, ramming into them and lurching over their fallen forms. In all, four people were killed: Mr. Austin, Ms. Geoghegan and cyclists from Switzerland and the Netherlands. Two days later, the Islamic State released a video showing five men it identified as the attackers, sitting before the ISIS flag. They face the camera and make a vow: to kill “disbelievers.”

I don’t believe these two cotton-headed dopey universalists deserved it…but they didn’t not deserve it. I hate their killers — evil personified — but I also hate the ideology of powerlessness and wishful thinking that enabled their victimization and the victimization of anyone who may be beguiled by their, yes, evil race-blind kumbaya beliefs.

The story screams out for a physiognomy reveal:

Crikey, the manjaw on that bish. If you shaved his beard and covered the top half of their faces, would you be able to tell who was the man and who was the woman? Who knew vegetarianism could grow such a mandible?

PS This timeline is unbeatable.

Mayor to female commissioner: You make a living off anal bleaching. It’s a PoundMeToo moment, she says

A Gabber quips, “I’ve noticed there is no denial of butthole bleaching.”

PPS More timelineliness:

SHOCK: The Catholic Church has a Big Homo Problem Again

Read Full Post »

iBugmen

Via.

lmao look at this mewlers’ row of ugs, fugs, bugs, and gaypedofaced soys. These are the in-house emojis of Apple’s corporate executives. Jony Ive is in the first row, second from left.

Half of these androgynes have sanpaku eyes. (Whites of the eyes showing on the bottom = drunken addict-prone degenerate. Whites of the eyes showing on the top = sociopath.)

It really amazes that our globohomo overlords are such creepy looking untermensch. Now that the curtain is pulled back on The Great Poz, we are free to mock them mercilessly until a better class of men replaces them.

Read Full Post »

Sacha Baron Cohen disguises himself as caricatures of people who come from groups he and his tribe despise, in order to dupe unsuspecting marks to reveal their Inner Bigot. That’s his schtick. It was pretty funny in Borat, (a movie that tellingly was far more light-hearted than his later output), but it’s been downhill since for his career as the full fury of his jewish hatred for the goyische kopf ripens and manifests in his movies in lockstep with his growing arrogance.

But now, it’s hard to laugh at Borat knowing that it percolates with Cohen’s jewish predilection to mock and humiliate Gentile Slavs (Kazakhs –> Cossacks). Once you’ve seen the blood-libel slicked gears of the Matzo Machine, you tend not to appreciate the assembly-line product as much.

His latest output is a Soytime series called Who Is America?, and unsurprisingly he spends most of the show posing as a flyover rube and luring trusting Heritage Americans and Trump voters into embarrassing interviews meant to confirm his (and his shitlib audience’s) preexisting prejudices. As if there wasn’t already a shrinking market in European Christendom for that brand of hostile jewish humor.

Interestingly, there was one Celtic-Aryan Übergoy who didn’t fall into COHEN’s trap:

Pretty obvious why Cohen doesn’t like Trump. Trump schooled Cohen badly in the Ali G sit down. The goyish kop schtick backfired and blew off Cohen’s dick.

Then Trump went and stomped every powerful Jew in America and Israel on his way to the oval office. The amount of Jewish cash, energy, and brain power that went into blocking Trump was off the charts. And still Trump prevailed.

Cohen would have to be a man of virtue and character to salute the weird greatness that is Trump. Instead Cohen is a nasty, hostile in-group warrior personality. He himself is the archetypal provincial bigot with the narrow worldview that he relentlessly hunts in his films.

In his films Cohen desperately seeks confirmation that everyone else is secretly as mean-spirited and bigoted as he is.

No wonder Cohen hates Trump, the one goy who didn’t roll over and take the shoffir up his ass with a polite cucksmile. “Trump is Great Warlord? Is not so niiiiice!”

Jewish psychological projection is so profound, conspicuous, and ubiquitous it ought to have its own DSM entry.

Cohen will learn like so many of his increasingly deranged and hysterical kind that it’s a new day in Trumperica, and the tool is no longer the naive heartland goy. It’s himself. The only mean-spirited, bigoted asshole in Who Is America? is a very un-American, bitterly resentful guest. An ingrate.

Read Full Post »

Here we learn what happens when you try a very risky trust fall into a low-trust crowd:

How do the French say SEND IT? @samsarmy

A post shared by Barstool Sports (@barstoolsports) on

Correction: How do the “French” say SEND IT?

Or, as a commenter put it:

Depends, what African tribal dialect are you asking about?

Heh heh heh.

This happened in “France”, during the riots in the wake of their Cantina Cup win. I see a crowd of Africans. I don’t see French. But “égalité”, “fraternité”, or something.

When a high trust people must mix with a low trust people, the high trust people lose. Naivete and gullibility are poor survival traits.

I can’t make out the race of the jumper, but if he’s a trusting White hurling himself into a crowd of indifferent blacks who watch him plummet to his death, then the symbolism would be too perfect.

Racial differences aren’t all about IQ. Behavior matters as well. And behavior, like IQ, is largely innate and heritable.

Read Full Post »

Peak Cuckservatism

GETTING IT DONE THE RIGHT WAY — 14K LEGAL IMMIGRANTS WILL BECOME AMERICANS ON INDEPENDENCE DAY

“When oath ceremonies are tied to the Fourth of July, it’s a message that immigrants believe in this country,” Joshua Hoyt, executive director of National Partnership for New Americans (NPNA), told ABC News. “It’s a beautiful and emotional thing.”

Did this phaggot get a tingle up his leg?

Hoyt added that NPNA supports naturalization as being “good for the immigrants, their communities, and our nation,” while contributing to “higher incomes” and “social cohesion,” according to ABC News.

Higher incomes and social cohesion? HAHA who does this cuck think he’s fooling? Talk about a Big Lie. I mean, sure, maybe if all the new immigrants were Whites from NW Europe, there’d be a positive effect on median income level and social cohesion (though the latter will require a moratorium to thwart population churn and for absorption to work its magic), but I bet the vast majority of these new arrivals that give Joshua Hoyt a cuckporn erection are nonWhite.

This is Peak Cuckservatism. “As long as they come here legally, we love the Somalis and Pakistanis who are turning our homeland into a facsimile of the shitholes they left!”

The “fictive kinship” that sustains a healthy culture and national cohesion is more easily formed and coalesced in a nation of ethnic and racial kinship. Our culture flows like a river from the source pool of our genetic heritage. Without the binding agent of race and ethnicity, our ability to find commonality in shared history, shared values, and shared myths is corrupted and greatly weakened. Yet again, I have to hit cucks over the head with this undeniable reality; the “legal immigration” of the world’s mudhutters they so desperately cling to for social respectability will just as assuredly destroy America as the illegal immigration they posture against to give air to their real unspoken fear that the massive invasion of non-Europeans will utterly and irrevocably transform America into a District 9 wasteland.

Reminder: the Chateau’s epic reference list of “shit cuckservatives say“. Gotta keep hammering these cucks until they are so publicly shamed that not even NPR will have them on as controlled opposition.

Read Full Post »

Overgaming is the mistake inexperienced but eager-to-learn men make with women. It’s a term that means “coming on too strong” (or too jerkish, or too cloying, or too supplicating, etc).

Overgaming usually occurs during the attraction phase of a pickup (the first fifteen minutes) because that’s when men are most hyped up to leave a solid impression on a qtπ. But overgaming can occur during any stage of a seduction, and it’s not uncommon for men to act too “creepy” during the comfort stage or too aggressive during the bedroom close.

However, rarely have I heard of overgaming during a blowjob, until now.

From Sad Girl:

Anecdote on ways to ruin something good. You will probably find it annoying that I am using your terminology and for being foul, but here goes since I am anonymous.

Annoying? I find it charming that you cum to me for help. Doubtless I would be less charmed if we were dating and you were regaling me with sexploits from your slutty past.

Scenario: Guy (a natural) I am dating told me I was worldclass at blowjobs in the middle of one (posture: cocky, leaning back casually on the sofa with his head resting in his hands, which I like to see)

Every man worth his yarbles should strike this pose at least once in his life when the opportunity ARISES. Your T level will go through the roof of the Trump Tower.

and outlining that I was in the top 3 in his life, *subtly ranking me while his dick was in my mouth*. Exceptional, you see – but not number one. A neg…

LMAO. I mean, this is funny af but totally unnecessary. In his defense….since when have jerkboys been known for their circumspection?

This kind of behaviour doesn’t lower his value to me psychologically, as I am sure you will understand.

All too well.

But…it has soured this ”special thing we share” – spending time together with his cock in my mouth. I think this is an example of ”overgaming”. My enthusiasm was at a level 10 for this act, and now it has dropped.

To a 9.5?

I am around 30 which I think you will find relevant, and there was literally no need to psychologically motivate me to suck harder by planting a seed of competition in my head, since it was already my favourite thing that I do constantly without being asked, and I assume that’s a huge part of why he is dating me.

How long had you two been dating when he gave your BJ technique a top 3 finish? (technically, he could have meant you were number one. technically.) If you had been dating for a while, and exclusively, then his hummerbrag would sound more like a toothless joke. If you had just started dating, then it would indicate something more ominous — that he was still playing the bj field or would be if your technique fell short (heh) of his standards. Or maybe he just thought it was funny, and jerkboys don’t bother with nuisances like idle thought filters.

In this case, there was only room to go down.

These things happen after a blowjob.

I think negging me in this situation like that made me enjoy it less, and I don’t think I can go back to the real enthusiasm I had before. I just feel differently now. It hurt my feelings, or my ego, or who knows the other things going on emotionally i haven’t sorted out yet, while I have actually been giving my all. It’s not the same now.

If you were genuinely hurt by his flagrante delicto judgment call, I have the cure for your sub-par bj blues.

*zzzzzziiiiiipp*

Get ready, your bj level is about to hit 99 (inches).

I’ll spare a moment of post-lockajw seriousness; if he only said it once and you can tell by his joy that he still loves cumming to you for your very special lessons in oral love, then don’t allow a poorly timed spell of overgaming to spoil you on him. And to be franknbeans, it sounds like you’re still with him, giving him a little less than your all (but which would still qualify as a bone-anza to the typical beta incel) but giving it to him nonetheless, so my conclusion is that you are HEAD over heels for this lovable jerk and came here to vent your insecurities about his potential waywardness, and wondering aloud if in coded language to Chateau lords the odds that Top 3 Knob Job Jerkboy would leave you for a girlie with a nimbler, precision targeting tongue.

To that, all I can advise is take a cue from his tone. Did he rank you in the braheemian vocal stylings of a man eager to show off, or was his message delivered with a blunt blurt suggesting his mind was likely drifting to memories of the agog minxmouths of lost lovers? If the former, brush it off. If the latter, there’s a website you can go to where you’ll find plenty of men who will treat you with the dearest respect you so obviously deserve when your polehole is wrapped for his pleasure:

http://www.mgtow.com

Read Full Post »

Via:

David French:

Physiognomy: soyed up
Familiognomy: cucked up

What’s a workable portmanteau of double-talker and cuckservative? Doublecuck? Cuckletalker? Self-cuckradictory? Hypocuck? Lying sack of cuck?

As far as I know, French isn’t ((())), so his cucking for (((THE))) foreign power of note is particularly repugnant. He may as well have a corner stool tattooed on his pelican gullet.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: