Archive for the ‘Tool Time’ Category

The Wash Post-Op anti-White propaganda blitz by Jonathon Morgan.

The debunking.

Will the Post-Op issue a retraction?

Not holding breath…

Read Full Post »

What a fruitcake. His poll numbers are single digits, but that’s way too high. He should have trouble scraping together the support of fifty gaypedoface voters.

Trump is right not to even mention this dope’s name. He’s a self-discrediting circus sideshow freak. But I wonder to whom his votes will go on election day, because libertardian voters always abandon the official Libertardian Candidate at crunch time. My guess is most of Fruitcake’s voters stay home to savor a day-long pot bender, or split their votes between Trump and thecunt.

Read Full Post »

In case you aren’t on Twatter, this studious evisceration of an article written by Jonathon Morgan purporting to “prove” that the alt-right is filled with “radical extremists” intent on committing the next 9/11 is one of the best counter-salvos against an emergent shitlib hate meme I have come across.

I suggest you take some time to read it through. Conclusion: What Morgan identifies as evidence of “alt-right radicalization” is actually just evidence that the alt-right is saying things that the media ACTIVELY COVERS UP OR REFUSES TO SAY.

Aligning yourself against the anti-Gentile narrative of the leftoid media hivemind can now class you as a “radical extremist” who is part of a “breeding ground for terrorism”. Did you get that? If you mention an unauthorized fact concerning our wonderful Diversitopia you are the equivalent of an ISIS supporter and should be placed on an FBI anti-terrorism watch list.

We are dealing with some truly evil manipulative fucks running the show in America. It almost as if they’re doing everything in their power to bring to life the very angry backlash they claim to want to avoid.


PS Shitlibs love quoting this mathematically ignorant “statistic” from Time:

In fact, until the nightclub shootings in Orlando, white extremists had committed more attacks and killed more Americans than jihadist extremists since 9/11.

Do shitlibs even math? The word a shitlib hates to hear more than any other is “disproportionate”. Meaning, as a share of their population (1%), Muslims in America are 5,000% more likely than non-Muslim Americans to commit a terrorist attack.


Read Full Post »

The rancid media libocrisy on display in their latest manufactured hysteria over Trump’s comments to some pedofaced Paki whose son was killed in the Iraq War that Hillary Clinton approved, and subsequently flaunted at the DNC degenerate freak parade to score anti-White political points, is so over the top that I find it hard to believe normal Americans will put up with this clown world for much longer.

This is the media scum we are dealing with:


Trump should not back off from this fight, even if the entire corrupt establishment — Dems, GOPe, media, billionaire oligarchs — is arrayed against him. He has a more powerful weapon:


A Muslim migrant who lost a son in a stupid American war based on lies is a poor premise upon which to base a nation’s border policy. This toolbag Khizr Khan (or so he innocently postures; he could very well know exactly what he’s doing) has so many sharia-friendly skeletons in his closet that he’s starting to get nervous about all the publicity he, or the DNC, unleashed upon himself. Khan is an immigration attorney who specializes in getting more Muslims into the US; he has ties with the Saudi government; is alleged to be a Muslim Brotherhood agent; and has connections to the slush fund known as the Clinton Foundation. The latest news about him is that his law firm’s web site was recently deleted. THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO HARAM….

Various shiv-righters on the Twatter and at MPC also gleefully pointed out the ¡SCIENCE-Y! numbers don’t support the Khan Is Who We Are Now Narrative: more American soldiers have been killed by Muslim-American soldiers than Muslim-American soldiers have been killed in action fighting for the US.

Unfortunately the link is dead, but assuming this is still around at MPC, it says it all about the Side of History we are being stuffed into, come hell or sharia law:



It’s amazing how coordinated the hottake on the DNC has been.

The new rally point is Mr. Kahn, the father of the Muzzie soldier KIA who held up a (pristine) pocket Constitution and challenged Trump to read it and discover the inviolable Zeroth Amendment (Sailer’s phrase) which guarantees limitless immigration to the U.S. for shitskins. Apparently according to the DNC, Mr. Kahn’s son was one of 14 killed on the American side in the GWOT. (Last night in chat I posted that this represents a 0.3% KIA rate for American Muslims compared to the total).

If I had the time to research it, we could probably come up with 1) the number of American Mohammedans killed fighting against the U.S. and/or for terrorist entities which likely exceeds 14; and, 2) the number of Muslim U.S. servicemen who turned on the U.S. while in uniform (Nidal Hassan, Hasan Akbar, etc.) which is not insignificant, and whose body count in the aggregate likely exceeds 14. It’s probably a significant net negative in either event and blows the proposition that Mr. Kahn was trying to establish out of the water.



Maximus, great observation!  I’ve been tweeting this hatefact at the usual suspects all afternoon.

The stats are:  Nidal killed 13 and Akbar killed 2, for 15 American soldiers killed by Muslim-American soldiers. There’s been at least one terrorist plot  planned by a Muslim-American soldier (Hasan Edmonds) thwarted. If you were willing to hammer it home, you could add the Beltway Sniper.

The number of Muslim-American service men killed in combat is supposedly 14, a number that was reported out of the House Homeland Security Committee by Chairman Peter King in 2011.

I actually have some doubts about the 14 number, but whatever.  The point is still valid….. More American soldiers (15) have been killed by Muslim-American soldiers, than Muslim-American soldiers have been killed in combat (14).

It’s great sadistic fun to rub shitlib faces in the FACTS, BIGOT! they purport to sacralize, but the essential nature of this war is a simpler proposition: No nation has a moral obligation to allow untold numbers of migrant foreigners on its soil. This goes double for immigrants who by genetic inheritance and habit are incompatible with American culture, and unlikely to ever become compatible. This is the tooth and nail of it: Neither the Constitution nor historically shared common sense sanctions that an endless infernal flow of alien peoples must necessarily remain unabated if America is to “live up to her principles”. The truth that even shitlibs acknowledge to themselves when alone in bed as a cold shiver sends them to sleep is that a limitless invasion of migrants will not only change America, it will change America’s principles. Forever.

The stakes could not be higher.


Read Full Post »

Days of Broken Arrows writes,

I’ve noticed that no one — and I mean no one — despises Trump quite like barren older women. As with Sarah Palin, they seethe with envy because fertility. The biggest anti-Trumpers I know are dried up old tarts.

I think this is right. Basically, Trump’s biggest haters are TheCunt’s biggest supporters. Which is fitting. This epic cage match is, when you boil it down, a war between White self-annihilators and proudly fertile Whites (using fertile in both the biological and cultural meanings). Existential, you might call it.

Read Full Post »

Germany has reached The Cuckularity. There are now state-sponsored “flirting workshops” that ostensibly instruct third world invaders — invading courtesy of the welcome mat put out by Mutter Merkel — in the art of picking up German women and, presumably, filling them with the seed of Saracen and the sperm of sub-Sahara until the White German race is sufficiently diluted as to be unrecognizable from the people of any third world shantytown idling under corrugated metal roofs.

I’m telling you, the backlash to all this insanity will be hellacious.

Read Full Post »

Michelle Fields is a former reporter/present attention whore who was canned from her job at Breitbart for making up a story about Trump’s campaign manager Corey Lewandowsky manhandling her and pushing her to the floor at a speaking event. She bubbled over to Twatter to show off her forearm bruise, and White Knights like Ben Shapiro jumped to her defense, choosing to take the word of a halfway decent-looking woman with slut eye at face value before the facts were in.

Security cam footage emerged a day after the incident clearly showing Fields suffered no assault beyond the jostling typical of a crowded room (she had claimed she was violently assaulted and pushed to the ground by Lewandowsky). Nonetheless she decided — or rather, she was encouraged by Shapiro — to file a formal charge with Florida police against Lewandowsky.

Unsurprisingly, nothing came of the trumped-up (heh) charge. The prosecutor (a Clinton lackey, no less) had no choice but to drop the case, citing lack of evidence for anything other than that Fields appeared in the video to fake a dive.

Palm Beach County won’t prosecute because video evidence shows Fields invaded Secret Service ‘bubble’ around Trump and touched him first

Lewandowski, they found, ‘reacted and did what he needed to do’ and bruises on Fields’ arm pictured days later were not visible that night

One witness told police he thought Fields staged ‘a fraudulent slip-and-fall’ and was ‘animated and acting’ – and ‘at first I thought she was drunk’

By the way, Trump stayed loyal to Lewandowski during this entire sordid skank-manufactured affair. That alone speaks volumes of Trump’s admirable character (and of his enemies’ lack of character).

This incident (among so many other alpha male-hating, feminist-fueled false accusations over the past few years) demonstrates the corrosive harm that beta male white knights can inflict on society, and on women.

Turning to little Benny Shapiro as an example, here’s a case of a white knight blowing up a woman’s career and killing what was left of her reputation as a reporter because he used his influence as an anhedonic orbiter and eunuch confidant to cajole her to elevate her fake assault game to the next level and file a charge with police (wasting taxpayer dollars in the meantime). Little Benny Shapiro hates the Trumpening and loves Michelle Fields’ cleavage, so he had every motivation to whisper sadistic nothings in her ear. She, being a woman, took the bait.

(I’m getting an image in my head of little Benny Shapiro dabbing bruise makeup on Fields’ arm, giggling like a schoolgirl as they conspire to END TRUMP’S NOMINATION RUN, and then little Benny, insistent boner denting his kid’s size jeans, looks “that way” at Michelle, & she quickly leaves the room.)

A far from exhaustive list of the ways in which white knights are bad for women:

  • white knights’ reptilian enticements to pursue futile revenge plots can destroy women’s careers
  • white knights’ cloying “m’lady” courtesies can simultaneously inflate women’s egos and deflate women’s labia, rendering them less likeable to the next man to talk to them, and therefore more likely to wind up an aging spinster
  • white knights’ quickness to jump to a faire maiden’s rescue when another man is hitting on her can ruin her chances at finding love
  • white knights’ ulterior motives (appeasement, flattery, and guardianship for the implied guarantee of sex at a later date) can sour women on all men, creating a resentful belief in women that every congenial interaction with a man is a pretext for sexual exploitation (which tbh is true if the woman in question is a hottie)
  • white knightss excessive you-go-grrlisms to their fat female friends can make those fatties insufferable to be around, as they assume every conversation with them is a romantic solicitation, and respond accordingly
  • white knights’ unctuous “supportiveness” toward their slutty female friends can convince those sluts to delay settling down to ride the cock carousel, possibly costing them a marriage and family to a quality (read: non-loser) man
  • white knights’ unthinking readiness to rush to a bitchy woman’s defense can encourage bitches to stay bitches instead of improving their personalities to attract good men
  • white knights’ instant and unquestioning forgiveness of women who have wronged them can create monsters incapable of guilt and tempted to take advantage of weak men for as long as they can get away with it

There is no end to the ways in which not being a white knight is better than being a white knight. The time when white knighting had any personal or social benefit was a long time ago; specifically when Western societies were structured around female deference and low cock counts. In that environment, male chivalry made sense.

PS The reader would do well to bracket this entire post in ((())) for improved understanding.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: