Archive for the ‘Ugly Truths’ Category

I loved this comment by TicklingTimeBomb describing the Life Cycle of the White Urban Shitlib (WUS for short).

I live in the urban educated white demographic being talked about here.

If I had to hazard an anecdotally-informed guess, it’d go something like this:

Urban educated whites start families very late. So they spend a LONG time without kids, often with good or great jobs, enjoying all sorts of DINK goods and services that cities can provide. And their views on government are often, mostly, at the level of abstractions and virtue signalling. And a lot of them are in the weird situation that they have quite a lot of disposable income, which means they feel pretty economically secure from one vantage point… which leads them to having lots of moral outrage about the plight of minorities who are their neighbors (from a few neighborhoods over) and who use the failing schools and suffer all the gang violence. So they feel Privileged. [ed: the source of tikkun olam] And yet on the other hand, they also feel incredibly economically pinched, because of insane housing prices, and student loan debt, and the need (down the road) for paying for private schools, which contributes hugely to them putting off family formation, along with social norms from their peers about it not being a big deal to start families late, and to have few children.

If you’re this person, the idea that government should step in and make it easier for you to start a family is pretty understandable. It sucks to be hitting your mid/late 30′s and thinking your life is just on hold for ever. OF COURSE, you’re actually right in this case. You SHOULD be looking to government to step in… because in the places where people can afford houses, like in major Texas cities, government absolutely does play a huge role in setting zoning, tax, and regulatory regimes that are pro-growing-the-middle-class housing supply. Ironically.

What I have seen, over and over, is that white educated urban dwellers have their first kid, weather a year or two trying to make it work, and then either their kids gets too big for their apartment and starts needing school, or the lack of yards starts grating, or they have a second kid, and they end up giving up, and abandoning the city. And then they move out to the suburbs, have their attitudes change, start seeing the other side of policy discussions because they now have kids and so have skin in the game, and they’re now surrounded by neighbors with a different set of social norms about family and government – hell, maybe they even join the local megachurch because they think the socialization will be good for their kids. They might still be socially liberal in some sort of airy abstract way, but at a nuts-and-bolts level, their tax dollars are segregated to people like themselves. And because they’ve moved, the norms of the cities they’ve had to abandon remain basically static. These people’s attitudes and world views change, but they bring those changes with them somewhere else, only to be replaced by younger versions of themselves in the city with their former attitudes. It’s like a standing wave.

This isn’t just purely theory – I’ve watched this process happen with people I know a bunch of times.

It’s tragicomic ’cause it’s true.


The point about cities being essentially “standing waves” of shitliberalism is spot on, and the reason why densely-populated cities will never politically convert to light blue, let alone pink or red. (A good test case of this assertion is to create a new city along the coast populated with only very conservative people bussed in from middle America. Will the city gradually turn blue, or will it be the deep red of the people who moved there and enjoy its hedonistic escapes?)

Cities aren’t just population sinks; they’re shitlord sinks. Any starting population of shitlords in a city won’t be able to sustain itself because the shitlords will “boil off”, leaving for the suburbs or countryside where their values and aesthetic don’t provoke aneurysms in the locals.

Of course, the shitlord sink theory of urbanity competes with the theory of heritable political disposition, but my thinking is that inherited dispositions (and their relation to reproductive fitness) are positively or negatively affected by the Weltanshauung of one’s human habitat; i.e., gene-culture co-evolution.

The one child-per family formation of WUSes mathematically means that their population will halve each generation, eventually meaning their extinction. So how do the cities continue functioning if there are fewer WUSes every year who feel an affinity for the anonymous child-free fucking of city life? (“put condom dispensers in grade schools, BIGOT”)

OPEN BORDERS IMMIGRATION is one method cities are replenished. Another city replenishment program is accomplished through the anonymous urban environment acting as a matchmaking service substitute for what used to be the concern of parents, church, and community, drawing in prime age hotties and high horny level anime aficionados on the promise of endless unencumbered sex and romantic interludes while dining at sidewalk cafes (but don’t make eye contact with the glowering google strutting by!).

tl;dr There’s a reason the anti-White and anti-Heritage America globalists want to herd everyone into dense urban spaygrounds modeled after Calhoun’s rat experiments (which they sell by exploiting environmental concerns about “sprawl”). City life is a shitliberalism factory with a handy expiration date built-in for the hated native stock.

Read Full Post »

“The sexual market is the one market to rule them all” — CH

Whenever proposing big picture theories for ideological beliefs, I always refer to the sexual market and how the dynamics of reproductive fitness operating at the level of the hindbrain primarily influence higher order human interactions like social or political organization.

This came to mind while reading about (((Josh Marshall’s))) attack on the most un-hateful man on the internet, Steve Sailer.

(of course you’ll notice marshall never answered steve’s pinpoint charge against him, preferring instead to cry out in pain while flinging shit at steve, which is the wont of his evasive reptilian subspecies)

Anyhow, an astute Sailer commenter noted something about Josh Marshall that goes a long way to explaining his anti-Gentile bitterness.

Marshall’s bride looks like the result of some Semitic inbreeding program.

Lefties are always unhappy because of the women, by dint of they’re [sic] inherent dweebieness, they’re forced to be with.

All politics isn’t local. All politics is gonadal.

Male shitlibs generally are an effete bunch, and their masculine, ugly girlfriends and groace wives testify to that. A manlet stuck with an ugly woman will over the years build up a reservoir of caustic spite against masculine high T men and the feminine women who love them. Josh Marshall fits the stereotype perfectly. Many of his extended kin fit the stereotype perfectly.

In fact, the exceptions are so glaringly obvious that they prove the rule. The skype men who more closely resemble in face and physique the male Gentile aesthetic tend also to be less antagonistic toward Gentile culture and politics.

Executioner’s Summary: Physiognomy is creed.


plumpjack has a novel theory that connects vision quality with shitliberalism.

does poor vision predispose someone to liberal, immediate gratification-leaning politics? IOW, is there a link between actual vision acuity and future time-orientation?

where I grew up, very red area, and lots of hawk-eyed, self-sufficient folks. the coke-bottle lens-sporting folks were always in white collar-ish jobs, or on food stamps. now I live in one of the most shitlibby towns on the planet and I swear, I can barely find a single person who doesn’t wear glasses. I can glimpse through the side of their reality warping lenses and see just how totally fkd up their eyesight is. it’s scary.

it could also be that a person with poor vision feels more vulnerable and therefore favors gibs policies. or it could be that they literally and figuratively cannot see into the future.

this should be studied. (note: i apologize to any commenters here who wear coke bottle type glasses. no offense. I’m just raising the question.)

It’s absolutely true that liberals, especially the male of the species, are physically unimpressive in one or more ways compared to their shitlord brethren, and poor eyesight is a big tell of shitlibbery. A powerful correlation, but is it more than that, as plumpjack suggests? Adjusted for the White race, does poor vision directly alter feedback loops in the brain that dispose the liberal to prefer insta-feelz over grappling with the long-term consequences of their policies and governance?

Read Full Post »

Ripp comments on the WikiLeaks torrent that has proved beyond doubt thecunt’s criminal involvement with vote and poll rigging, incitement to violence at Trump rallies, and pay-for-play access to her State Department favor machine.

“If Assange did have some REAL dynamite”

Theres been plenty of dynamite. Plenty of election and campaign funding violations already.

But the rot is so deep it just doesnt matter.

This is a scary thought. What if Ripp is right (and the evidence of the past year certainly confirms his gloomy prognosis)?

What if the American media and major information gateways AND the US political establishment AND the FBI, CIA and NSA — all of them except a few lonely, croaking voices trying to break through the anti-white noise — are stocked rug to rafters with Clinton and Twerk and Fat Cat Party apparatchiks who glibly and gleefully ignore or suppress the truth about Clinton’s criminal activities and traffic in lies, misinformation, and blatant narrative propaganda to discredit her opponent?

What if the rot is so deep the truth has no way of reaching the light?

What if the incestuous evil and corruption in every American institution are so scrupulously shielded from scrutiny by the ruling class and their media whores that the Good and Righteous slumber silently to a sad and lonely death that goes unnoticed….worse, callously ignored….worse still, deliberately perpetrated…by those very same entities tasked with the duty to speak for the vulnerable and the powerless and expose the depredations of the powerful?

What if there is no Deep State…only ONE SOROSIAN STATE with interests diametrically opposed to the interests of the American people?

What if this ONE SOROSIAN STATE establishes itself so firmly and permanently in the American social and political fabric that the only outlets for truth are mischievous online retreats, tucked far away from mass consciousness? And when the SOROSIAN STATE achieves total victory, how long do you think Le Chateau will stand athwart cuckery yelling COWARD before WordPress is given the order to SHUT IT DOWN?

What if the rot….IS THE WHOLE POINT?

Evil doesn’t always lose.

Chairman Mao died a rich old man while still in office.

But I can tell you this.

Truth always wins, one way or another.

If truth doesn’t win from within the system (via the exposure of lies by the people’s guardians) then truth will win outside the system.

Outside the system is where the rivers of blood flow.

Read Full Post »

It’s not like anyone who isn’t snorting Hillary “thecunt” Clinton’s magic muff dust needs the additional confirmation that she’s a corrupt wicked bitch, but here’s another log to add to the inferno that will be thecunt’s eternal lair in the short time it takes for her Parkinson’s to progress past the point where her security detail and the media can’t hide it anymore.

Close Clinton ally gave $467,500 to wife of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe who was investigating Clinton

Executioner’s Summary: Longtime Clinton friend Terry McAuliffe donated, via his Virginia Democrat Twerk and Fat Cat Party, a half million dollars to the wife of the Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, who helped oversee the investigation into Hillary’s email use, (which was predictably dismissed on grounds of….insufficient evidence? nope, that wasn’t it……the FBI’s excuse if I recall had something to do with…what was it again?…hillary broke the law but didn’t break it *enough* to justify affecting the election outcome?…yeah something along those lines).

In Sane World (instead of the Clown World we currently inhabit), this would be known as bribery, which as far as I know is a felony crime if a public official is involved. But nooooo the media isn’t in the tank for Hillary at all, what with their studied effort to ignore any and all evidence pointing in the direction of Hillary malfeasance. /sarcasm

Trump will be our next President (the two most accurate polls from 2012 show Trump either with a lead or tied), but if the force multiplier media shilling for Hillary should somehow deny the God Emperor his rightful throne, then I expect — predict! — that thecunt will be impeached within her first two years trying to shove as many syrians and somalis into heartland America. The media can pull the wool over Americans’ eyes for a couple of weeks leading up to a national election; it can’t keep up thecunt circle wagoning charade for years.


In related poll rigging news, far fewer state polls have been done in the past month compared to the same time period from 2012.

It’s very easy to see the purpose of the rigged polling strategy that is being pursued by the Crooked Cunt Campaign-media-polling agency Axis of Untruth. The number fudging, oversampling, and “the lackeys doth protest too much” MSM insistence of an inevitable Cunt victory are designed to demoralize and depress the turnout of Trump’s constituency: heritage America.

Trumpentroopers, don’t fall for it. This election will be FAR closer than thecuntmedia lets on. You’re at the despot’s walled sanctum about to storm the globohomo COCKtail party; this is no time to go flaccid.


For your viewing consideration: “Anonymous” conducts a 1,000 person-per-state poll weighted 33% D, 33% R, and 34% I:

Read Full Post »

From September 1 to October 13, the Reuters/Ipsos poll has been gradually and incrementally oversampling Democrats and undersampling Republicans as a percentage of likely voters:


Note that this isn’t showing a secular change in voter party identification year-after-year. It shows an oversampling bias for one party over a period of weeks. The number of likely voters did not suddenly become 18% more Democrat in six weeks time.

If you can’t see the graph clearly, click here for a zoom-in version.

Why would polling outfits rig their results to favor Hillary “thecunt” Clinton? My theory is the simplest explanation: the people who run the polling companies, and the techies who administer the polls, are in the tank for thecunt. It doesn’t even have to be deliberate; if the personal emotional affinity for thecunt, or the antagonism for Herr Trump, is strong enough it can subconsciously guide pollsters to produce distorted data that is readily rationalized later as, say, “reflecting the changing composition of an electorate in flux”.

Another now-plausible post-WikiLeaks theory: thecunt’s surrogates are bribing pollsters to boost thecunt’s numbers.

The next question is, “how do rigged polls help thecunt? If she’s losing in reality, rigged polls will just make her more blissfully ignorant of her incoming defeat.”

The answer lies in the psychology of humans, and is related to Game and picking up women. If you create a perception of success or desirability, the voters (women) will assume you are going to win (bed them), and will paradoxically make your path to victory smoother.

There is a school of thought that says poll rigging can hurt more than it helps, by instilling in thecunt’s degenerate freak mafia a smug complacency about her inevitable victory, which will depress turnout as her supporters stay home to passively watch her victory unfold. I don’t buy this. It’s a misunderstanding of human nature, specifically the part of human nature which loves to “crush your enemies and see them driven before you”. If thecunt’s supporters feel emboldened by favorable polls, they will be MORE likely to swarm the voting booths to get a chance to participate in the bloodbath.

No, let’s dispel with this notion that the rigged system is a stroke of providence that will hurt thecunt in the end. The rigged system operatives know exactly what they’re doing, and that is why Trump is right to call them out on it.

Big ol’ rigged polls serve thecunt in three ways:

  1. Perception of desirability/success/inevitability.
  2. Demoralization of Trump supporters. (Bad polls can depress turnout for the candidate who is behind)
  3. Most importantly, rigged polls give cover to thecunt conglomerate to engage in vote fraud.

On that last point, the calculus works like this: If the polls are accurate and going into the election there is a small MOE difference between thecunt and Trump, then it would be harder for thecunt to pull off vote fraud without Trump contesting it and shining a light on all the DNC crookedness. If, otoh, the clown world polls are rigged and going into Election Day thecunt leads by double digits, (even if in reality she’s tied with Trump), then committing vote fraud becomes a lot more plausibly deniable, (media hack: “oh come now, trumpenpleb, why would the hillary campaign commit vote fraud when all the polls showed her coasting to victory?”).

This is really the usefulness of the rigged polls to thecunt: demoralization and perception manipulation don’t usually have the massive impact to alter election outcomes in multiple battleground states, but vote fraud….now we’re cooking with gas! It’s easy to understand all the working parts of this rigged system if you keep one thing in mind: the media and all its adjuncts and subsidiaries and information pipelines and channels are a propaganda arm of thecunt campaign.


This is a good time to remember that the polls got it wrong about the GOP landslide in the 2014 midterms. Why? Because the polls were SKEWED TOWARD DEMOCRAT TURNOUT. Which was the SAME GIGO ERROR the pollsters are making now, leading up to America’s Last Election.


Ang Aamer comments,

Actually there is a fairly straightforward explanation of this bias.

Most polls construct their samples based on a subset representative of the population you want information on. We have had two presidential cycles where there has been historic African American participation in the presidential election. Since a pollster would like to sample the voter population that will show up on Nov 8th. The percentages of voters who showed up in 2008 and 2012 would normally be a good guide.

BUT, we are also coming off of historic off year elections in 2010 and 2014 where this African American voting block DID NOT show up to the polls. The effects of these elections are so disparate that pollsters SHOULD find some sample methodology that would be the average of 2008,2010,2012 and 2014.

Now the inside baseball, everyone in politics knows that Killary will NOT get Obama 2008 and 2012 numbers. But they don’t know how close the numbers will be to 2010 and 2014. So they hedge their bets and take a point in the middle.

With me so far? Ok so if you are corrupt and you KNOW that nobody has the answer for the sample percentages what do you do? That’s right you stack the deck with people who will say that 2016 will be like 2012 and 2008!!! You stack the deck so well and convince the sample constructors so much that everyone herds along and puts their sample construction at 2008/2012 numbers.This thumb pressing on the scales is deliberate manipulation at one point in the polling execution that is high impact low deception detection. AND it’s defense-able!! Nobody knows “for sure” that Killary won’t get Obama numbers. So it’s easy to convince the weak minded that she will.

But the killer in all this is the AMOUNT of thumb pressing the sample creators had to do to get Hillary up in their polls!!! Right now the pollsters are assuming a voter population EXACTLY like 2008! They are assuming the first AA president enthusiasm! And they will be wrong. But what may happen is an opposite effect of the enthusiasm going into the R column instead of the D column. This could not only swing the 5 point thumb pressing margin. But add another 5 points in the opposite direction! Which of course would yield a Dilbert Landslide outcome.

THIS is why Killary was shrieking about why she is not ahead by 50 points. She was projecting a very real fear. If 2016 is NOT going have turnouts like 2008 she will need that wide margin in the polls to win. Since she is not ahead by wide margins there IS A REAL possibility that turnout not in keeping with 2008/2012 will lead to defeat.

I have always felt in my “gut” that Scott Adams was right about the landslide. But I always chuckled that such a margin was not possible. And in reality IT SHOULD NOT BE. But if the polls are fudged by the margins I think they are. AND Trump gets the enthusiasm like Obama 2008 in his column. It just might be a landslide of epic proportions, like Regan in 1980. No one saw 1980 coming either.

Revolutions (and enthusiasm gaps) have a nasty habit of messing up the Big Data nerdos’ models and forecasts. And revealing to the world the schemers putting their thumbs on the scales.

Read Full Post »

Diversity + Proximity = War (by electoral means):


No worries. We keep being told by the pretty lie police that race and sex are social constructs, so by the transitive property of equality any election result that is determined by the votes of social constructs is itself a social construct. Which means Trump doesn’t have to concede in the event thecuntcrü rigs the election, because it’s impossible to concede to something that isn’t real.

The Founders had the right idea — only White men with a stake in the nation should be allowed to vote. The enfranchisement of nonWhites and women ever since has rapidly calcified the decline of America.

Interestingly, the shitlib mythology of a monolithic oppressive White power structure is blown up by these maps, where we can easily see that White people are the most ideologically diverse group in America. The groups that vote tribally are colored people (superfluous preposition removed).

The reason I didn’t break down the POC vote into various groups by gender, ethnicity, or education level is that no matter how I broke it down, it was always 100% blue.


ps Not entirely unrelated to this post’s subject, a big reason the Verbal Class is getting outgunned in social media is because they are deficient in visual-based mediums that emphasize the transmission of gut-punch memes and neutralize the sophist’s advantage of beguiling foes with an avalanche of wordy evasiveness.

Read Full Post »

One of the WikiLeaks emails appears to reveal a direct link between Hillary’s campaign chief, John Podesta, and acts of Democrat voter fraud. (via an anonymous deplorable at /pol/):



So much corruption, collusion, and conflict of interest in the Democrat Party and the Clinton Machine. And of course Soros, a minion of Satan (both start with S and have five letters!), is the Lizard of Poz behind the curtain.

Trump is right to say he won’t automatically concede the election. The system IS rigged, and the rot goes all the way to the bone. The GloboHomoBezos alliance would LOVE if Trump cucked himself out and said something like “I will honor and respect the principles of this Constitutional Republic and lose gracefully no matter what evidence of voter fraud and election malfeasance may surface between now and then…”, because that would make their rigging job that much easier to pull off. But Trump is a fighter, and he has put the globigarchs on notice: their malevolence will be met with fierce resistance.


pps Cleveland is in the World Series. In the movie Major League, Ricky Vaughn led the hapless Cleveland Indians to a World Series.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: