Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Ugly Truths’ Category

A Gabber prompts the title of this post with the following thought experiment,

It is also more important to control women’s sexuality than men’s sexuality.

Hypothetical;
A tribe of 100 men and 100 women.
You control the sexuality of 99 men and 1 woman? You get 99 single mothers.
You control the sexuality of 1 man and and 99 women? You get 1 single mother.

A perfectly illustrative hypothetical. About the only edit I would make is to account for female hypergamy: in the second scenario, the one unconstrained woman would choose the apex alpha (if her appearance was sufficiently arousing to allow her the choice) and ignore the remaining 98 men granted freedom of sexuality. You’d still get a single mom, though, because that apex alpha would be set upon by the 98 blue-balled betas who would kill him (if they didn’t also kill her infant in the way usurping lions are wont to do).

This is why White Knights are so fucking stupid to attempt their pedestal polishing within the context of a society that has removed all constraints on female sexuality (while retaining shame-based restrictions on male sexuality). These goobers practiced in the brute art of thot enabling are unwittingly abetting and exacerbating social dysfunction and atomized sexual market transactionalism.

It’s not a coincidence that the single mommery rate rose to heights previously unimagined in America at the same time the abolishment of social controls on women released free ranging vagina on the land.

It’s unturtling gashes all the way down.

Read Full Post »

I’ve been meaning to start up a Stone Cold Truth T-shirt Company monetized through something like CafePress, but, well, life, like my meat, intrudes. It’s too bad, really, because perusing back issues of this blogsheet reminds me of all the stick figure drawings and verbal jujitsu that would look great emblazoned on a pec-hugging v-neck, to be worn to da clubs to provoke tingle-gushing shit tests.

ANYHO, a Gabster thought the following by yours truly — an ASCII tablet of inscribed Chateau Principles inspired by a stray musing about the nature of the power of sophistic skypery — would make a great graphic tee:

Jews understand that a coherent, pithy world view can subvert civilizations. Right back atcha, schlomo inc, the chateau world view, annotated:

Chicks dig power
Men dig beauty
Equalism is a lie
Sex differences are real
Race differences are real
Culture is race
Race is genes
and the hour is late

There’s a dissident business owner on Gab who goes by the handle @cryptofashion who may be interested in seeing my Weltanschauung on a line of t-shirts, papuan cock sleeves, beach towels, and bikini bottoms (waif font required).

It’s time to Make Shitlibs Uncomfortable Again.

Read Full Post »

Jews are half-White. I’ve mentioned this before, but now we have genetic evidence proving my sensible observation.

The Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population is important in genetics due to its high rate of Mendelian disorders. AJ appeared in Europe in the 10th century, and their ancestry is thought to comprise European (EU) and Middle-Eastern (ME) components. However, both the time and place of admixture are subject to debate. Here, we attempt to characterize the AJ admixture history using a careful application of new and existing methods on a large AJ sample. Our main approach was based on local ancestry inference, in which we first classified each AJ genomic segment as EU or ME, and then compared allele frequencies along the EU segments to those of different EU populations. The contribution of each EU source was also estimated using GLOBETROTTER and haplotype sharing. The time of admixture was inferred based on multiple statistics, including ME segment lengths, the total EU ancestry per chromosome, and the correlation of ancestries along the chromosome. The major source of EU ancestry in AJ was found to be Southern Europe (≈60–80% of EU ancestry), with the rest being likely Eastern European. The inferred admixture time was ≈30 generations ago, but multiple lines of evidence suggest that it represents an average over two or more events, pre- and post-dating the founder event experienced by AJ in late medieval times. The time of the pre-bottleneck admixture event, which was likely Southern European, was estimated to ≈25–50 generations ago. …

Running RFMix on the AJ genomes with our EU and ME reference panels and summing up the lengths of all tracts assigned to each ancestry, the genome-wide ancestry was ≈53% EU and ≈47% ME

Ashkenazi Jews are ancestrally 53% European White and 47% Middle Eastern Caucasian.

I make the distinction for a reason. “Caucasian” is the broadest possible racial category; “White” has always colloquially referred to the peoples native to Europe (including Western Russia). “Caucasian” includes such luminaries to the European cultural canon as Turks, Pakistanis, Afghans, Iranians, Algerians, etc etc. /sarcasm

No one who isn’t a disingenuous prick would argue that Afghans, for instance, are anything like Germans, Italians, Hungarians, or Danes, or that the collective latter are as genetically and culturally close to Afghans as they are to each other. So “White” correctly draws a colloquial distinction between the European people and the wild outposts where Caucasian warlords roam.

And so it is with Jews: by the conventional definition of “White”, they are a half-White, half-Semite ethnicity. Precisely, a half-White, half-Levantine (eastern Mediterranean) ethnicity:

… We observed that in simulations of admixed genomes, the Middle-Eastern regional source could have also been recovered by running the same localization pipeline. Applying that pipeline to the AJ genomes, we identified Levant as the most likely ME source: the proportions of chromosomes classified as Levantine was 51.6%, compared to 21.7% and 22.2% classified as Druze and Southern ME, respectively.

… In these simulations, we fixed the Levantine admixture proportion to 50% and varied the proportions of the different European regions. We then used a grid search to find the ancestry proportions that best fit the observed fraction of AJ chromosomes classified as each ancestry. The simulation results (Fig 2) suggest that the European component of the AJ cohort is 34% Southern EU, 8% Western EU, and 8% Eastern EU. This analysis thus suggests that roughly 70% of EU ancestry in AJ is Southern European.

The genetic analysis also confirms age-old observational wisdom that Jews and Italians share aesthetic, culinary, hirsute, and some cultural similarities. (But their differences are still yuge; see, for example, how Jews and Italian-Americans voted in the last election.)

The genetic facts of half-White, half-Semite Jewish ancestry shows in their look and their behavior. (Yes, Jews have a “look”. Those who aren’t bullshit artists with a motivated bias can readily identify 9 out of 10 Jews in a crowd of Christian Gentiles by face alone.)

Even the blonde-haired, blue-eyed Jews who inherited a greater share of Eastern European genes can be identified by facial appearance and do stand out from the background EE Gentile population. Now, with the increase in Jewish out-marriage in America, there are more Jews who can pass almost completely for Gentiles, but primarily in appearance it would seem, because behaviorally Jews are as separate from Gentiles as they have ever been. However, I’ve noticed that the Jews with very Gentile physiognomies also lean more rightward in their politics than the norm for their tribe and are more comfortable “bro-ing it up” with Gentile Chads.

The crucial take-home point is that the unique (some would call it peculiar) half-White, half-Semite Jewish ethnic ancestry correlates with a stereotypical Jewish personality and behaviors, which GENTILES CAN NOTICE when they aren’t lying to themselves and others to avoid a pained bout of evangelical cogdis. From Cagey Beast,

[This genetic analysis] matches up with pretty much everyone’s sense of [Jews]: familiar but somehow off. A little later we realize how these folks always insist the rest of us are wrong about everything, all the time, forever.

Ashkenazi Jews rock. Nothing makes me happier than the fusion of WASP triumphalism and Ashkenazi tikkun olam. I think something magical and wondrous (and not the least bit Satanic) happens when money-grubbing heretics join with lapsed East European Jews to form a coalition to transform Christendom by force.

The Uncanny Ari.

Isn’t it time we stopped Lying about observable reality and embraced enlivening Truth? We all would waste a lot less mental energy and far fewer resources on a quixotic quest to force a defiant Reality to accommodate our Lies. And, we would finally see more clearly the threats to our nation, our towns, our families, and our souls.

PS I know this blog has plenty of jewish readers. You come to this place for the quippy lip and the hard truths. Well, I give them to you. Try not to take it personally when my Truth Shivs point at the antics of your own tribe. If I held back, would this place be nearly half as fun? Instead of lashing out in tribal indignation, try something different for once: take it in stride and do a little self-examination. It’s good for the soul…if you believed you had one.

Read Full Post »

From Mabui,

When in a social setting with mothers, suggest that all children should be checked for paternity at birth to prevent paternity fraud, observe the various mothers’ reactions. Some get a very guilty expression. Listen to the various rationalizations. If they are married and husband is in the room they also seem to censor themselves. Last time I did this a mother whose children don’t resemble her husband came up with “Well it has happened for thousands of years and we all got along just fine without DNA tests.”

LOL the old “royal we” hamsterization.

Lady, for thousands of years women reproduced at twice the rate of men. Do you want to go back to that way of doing things (say goodbye to civilization)?

I’m sure there were plenty of men throughout human history who not only aired their grievances about uncertain paternity, but killed the women they suspected of cuckoldry and dashed the bastard infant on the rocks. “We” got along fine? Doubtful. “Women” got along fine with cuckoldry…yes, that’s true. Women subconsciously want that Mr Meaty Intrusion Alpha Fux option available to them in case Mr Vegetable Lasagna Beta Bux makes the mistake of leaving her alone for a few days to go on a hunting excursion.

Now that paternity assurance tests are here and affordable, women suddenly aren’t so keen on extending full reproductive rights to men. How utterly predictable!

If you think the sexual market is in chaotic flux now, just wait until paternity testing becomes widespread. A de facto paternity assurance institution will wonderfully focus the distaff mind.

Read Full Post »

The quote in this post’s title is from a woman.

Is she wrong?

(h/t jeangray07)

speaking of big truths, this woman is getting ripped to shreds on Facebook for dropping some truth bombs

The authoress, Lori Alexander, tackles the subject from a Christian perspective:

Do you know how much more attractive debt-free virgins (without tattoos) are to young men? Unfortunately, there are so few of these types of young women anymore because of the high costs of college (debt) and sexual promiscuity even within those in the church. As believers in Jesus Christ, we need to live in a way that is pleasing to Him because His ways are the best. He calls debt a burden and urges us to live lives of sexual purity.

There are many more reasons why Christian young women should carefully consider whether or not they go to college, especially if they want to be wives and mothers someday. Secular universities teach against the God of the Bible and His ways. It’s far from what God calls women to be and do: it teaches them to be independent, loud, and immodest instead of having meek and quiet spirits.

She is right, because the New Testament of Jesus is basically age-old wisdom about the Darwinian nature of the sexes wrapped in religious symbolism. But I prefer to skip the middleman and go straight to the helical chaser.

Men prefer debt-free virgins without tattoos because

  1. debt indicates indulgence and low self-restraint, qualities that correlate with sluttiness (as well as being a golddigger)
  2. tattoos similarly indicate indulgence and impulsivity, also correlating with sluttiness (tats are cues for casual sex availability, which in a woman is opposed to her commitment worthiness. aesthetically, tats obscure and disfigure the clear, supple skin of prime fertility babes)
  3. sluttiness is unattractive to a man who is looking for a relationship (slutty women can’t be trusted)
  4. virginity in and of itself is attractive to men because it indicates a woman who has not become jaded and befouled from riding the cock carousel, a woman who will more easily fall deeply in love with her “first and only” man (for she has little to compare him too — see: alpha widowhood), and a woman who can be better trusted to remain faithful and therefore guarantee a father’s paternity should the two decide to commit and have kids
  5. not to mention, virginity means a tight twat, which is extremely pleasurable to a man

Anyhow, I’m glad that Christian housewives and Your Humble Heartiste can see eye to eye on the pressing issues of the day.

PS The fact that there are vanishingly few adult-aged American Woman virgins just means the few virgins there are get to enjoy sky high value on the marriage market. Work it, chasties!

Read Full Post »

Via Lovekraft, a Faceborg post (reposted on Reddit) worth reading in full, condensing recent history into a clear and concise explainer for toxically self-deluding and malicious shitlibs:

To all the people who let this election break up families and friends let this sink in I think the last civil conversations we had occurred just days before November 8, 2016. You were supremely confident Hillary Clinton would win the presidential election; you voted for her with glee. As a lifelong Republican, I bit down hard and cast my vote for Donald Trump. Then the unimaginable happened. He won. And you lost your freaking minds.

I knew you would take the loss hard—and personally—since all of you were super jacked-up to elect the first woman president. But I did not imagine you would become totally deranged, attacking anyone who voted for Trump or supported his presidency as a racist, sexist, misogynistic, homophobic Nazi-sympathizer.

The weirdness started on social media late on Election Night, as it became clear Hillary was going to lose. A few of you actually admitted that you were cradling your sleeping children, weeping, wondering what to tell your kindergartner the next morning about Trump’s victory. It continued over the next several days. Some of you seriously expressed fear about modern-day concentration camps. Despite living a privileged lifestyle, you were suddenly a casualty of the white patriarchy. Your daughters were future victims; your sons were predators-in-waiting. You threatened to leave Facebook because you could no longer enjoy the family photos or vacation posts from people who, once friends, became Literal Hitlers to you on November 8 because they voted for Donald Trump.

I admit I was a little hurt at first. The attacks against us Trump voters were so personal and so vicious that I did not think it could be sustained. I thought maybe you would regain your sanity after some turkey and egg nog.

But you did not. You got worse. And I went from sad to angry to where I am today: Amused. As the whole charade you have been suckered into over the last 18 months starts to fall apart—that Trump would not survive his presidency; he would be betrayed by his own staff, family, and/or political party; he would destroy the Republican Party; he would be declared mentally ill and removed from office; he would be handcuffed and dragged out of the White House by Robert Mueller for “colluding” with Russia—let me remind you what complete fools you have made of yourselves. Not to mention how you’ve been fooled by the media, the Democratic Party, and your new heroes on the NeverTrump Right.

On November 9, you awoke from a self-induced, eight-year-long political coma to find that White House press secretaries shade the truth and top presidential advisors run political cover for their boss. You were shocked to discover that presidents exaggerate, even lie, on occasion. You became interested for the first time about the travel accommodations, office expenses, and lobbyist pals of administration officials. You started counting how many rounds of golf the president played. You suddenly thought it was fine to mock the first lady now that she wasn’t Michelle Obama. Once you removed your pussy hat after attending the Women’s March, you made fun of Kellyanne Conway’s hair, Sarah Sanders’ weight, Melania Trump’s shoes, Hope Hicks’ death stare; you helped fuel a rumor started by a bottom-feeding author that U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley slept with Donald Trump. You thought it was A-OK that Betsy DeVos was nearly physically assaulted and routinely heckled. You glorified a woman who has sex on camera for a paycheck.

You have learned all kinds of new things that those of us who didn’t willfully ignore politics for the past eight years already knew. For example, we already knew that illegal immigrants were being deported and families were being separated.

Some of your behavior has been kinda cute. It was endearing to watch you become experts on the Logan Act, the Hatch Act, the Second Amendment, the 25th Amendment, and the Emoluments Clause. You developed a new crush on Mitt Romney after calling him a “sexist” for having “binders full of women.” You longed for a redux of the presidency of George W. Bush, a man you once wanted imprisoned for war crimes. Ditto for John McCain. You embraced people like Bill Kristol and David Frum without knowing anything about their histories of shotgunning the Iraq War.

Classified emails shared by Hillary Clinton? Who cares! Devin Nunes wanting to declassify crucial information of the public interest? Traitor! But your newfound admiration and fealty to law enforcement really has been a fascinating transformation. Wasn’t it just last fall that I saw you loudly supporting professional athletes who were protesting police brutality by kneeling during the national anthem? Remember how you fanboyed a mediocre quarterback for wearing socks that depicted cops as pigs?

But now you sound like paid spokesmen for the Fraternal Order of Police. You insist that any legitimate criticism of the misconduct and possibile criminality that occured at the Justice Department and FBI is an “attack on law enforcement.” While you once opposed the Patriot Act because it might have allowed the federal government to spy on terrorists who were using the local library to learn how to make suitcase bombs, you now fully support the unchecked power of a secret court to look into the phone calls, text messages and emails of an American citizen because he volunteered for the Trump campaign for a few months. Spying on terrorists, circa 2002: Bad. Spying on Carter Page, circa 2017: The highest form of patriotism.

And that white, male patriarchy that you were convinced would strip away basic rights and silence any opposition after Trump won? That fear has apparently been washed away as you hang on every word uttered by James Comey, John Brennan, and James Clapper. This triumvirate is exhibit “A” of the old-boy network, and represents how the insularity, arrogance, and cover-your-tracks mentality of the white-male power structure still prevails. Yet, instead of rising up against it, you are buying their books, retweeting their Twitter rants and blasting anyone who dares to question their testicular authority. Your pussy hat must be very sad.

But your daily meltdowns about Trump-Russia election collusion have been the most entertaining to observe. After Robert Mueller was appointed as Special Counsel, you were absolutely convinced it would result in Trump’s arrest and/or impeachment. Some of you insisted that Trump wouldn’t last beyond 2017. You quickly swallowed any chum tossed at you by the Trump-hating media on MSNBC, the New York Times and the Washington Post about who was going down next, or who would flip on the president.

For the past year, I have watched you obsess over a rotating cast of characters: Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner, Carter Page, Reince Priebus, Jeff Sessions, Michael Flynn, Steve Bannon, Sam Nunberg, and Hope Hicks are just a few of the people you thought would turn on Trump or hasten his political demise. But when those fantasies didn’t come true, you turned to Michael Avenatti and Stormy Daniels for hope and inspiration. It will always be your low point. Well, I think it will be. Each time I believe you’ve hit bottom, you come up with a new baseline. Perhaps defending the unprecedented use of federal power to spy on political foes then lie about it will the next nail in your credibility coffin.

The next several weeks will be tough for you. I think Americans will learn some very hard truths about what happened in the previous administration and how we purposely have been misled by powerful leaders and the news media. I wish I could see you as a victim here, but you are not. I know you are smart; you chose to support this insurgency with your eyes wide open.

Julie Kelly American Greatness

“But it was just Russian bots who voted for Trump” — The Strapon Within

I have nothing to add. This was a beautiful ray of truth from Julie Kelly, piercing a veil of shitlib lies, distortions, and delusions.

Read Full Post »

Think for a second about what they are demanding. If you don’t automatically accept the imprecise, unspecific, never-fully-explained findings of shadowy intelligence agencies with long, documented track records of making serious mistakes, you’ve somehow betrayed your country. The very people who assured you Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, the ones who said the Shah would never fall in Iran, etc, etc…..THOSE people must be accepted without question or else.

On television this group is called the “Intelligence Community.” That’s an Orwellian name if there ever was one….where exactly IS this community we hear so much about? Does it have a ZIP code? A public library system? A youth football league? How long before Congress demands unthinking obedience to the “Lawmaker Community?” It’s a community after all, you must obey it…dissent is unpatriotic, and if you don’t agree, you’re working for Vladimir Putin.

That’s where we’re headed, by the way, and fast.

In some ways this whole story is about Donald Trump and what he said and what he does. But on a deeper level, it has nothing to do with Donald Trump. This is about democracy–whether or not voters rule their country. It turns out the very people telling you they are saving our democracy are working overtime to destroy it, and scolding you as they do.

There is a threat to our democracy, but it isn’t coming from Russia. It’s coming from the malevolent nexus between the Uniparty, Deep State and the Chaimstream Media, a powerfully evil alliance that’s hellbent on seeing through its Globohomo agenda and dispossessing Heritage Americans from their homeland, wherever their hearth.

Lest we forget in the current climate of anti-Trump (read: anti-White) hysteria that our intelligence agencies utterly discredited themselves in the lead-up to the Iraq War:

Respect and trust must be earned, and both can be easily lost. The “intelligence community” lost the respect and trust of mentally sane Americans when the three letter agencies discredited themselves over and over again, betraying either gross incompetence or treasonous malice. Now that Trump is calling them out, we’re supposed to genuflect before his nefarious Deep State enemies and take their word that Trump and what he represents is a threat to American institutions and values?

We should be so lucky that this threat materializes and rids our nation of these loathsome globalist scum.

PS John Brennan status: RAPED LIKE AN AFGHAN GOAT

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: