Racist Babies

SCIENCE! is rapidly (re)discovering that racism is natural, normal, and biologically inborn. Two studies found that 6-to-9 month old infants “demonstrate racial bias in favour of members of their own race and racial bias against those of other races.” INFANTS, which means for you social kuntstructivists that MUH PATRIARCHAAAAAAHHH had no time to exert its magical white privileging influence on the infant brains.

In the first study, “Older but not younger infants associate own-race faces with happy music and other-race faces with sad music”, published in Developmental Science, results showed that after six months of age, infants begin to associate own-race faces with happy music and other-race faces with sad music.

In the second study, “Infants rely more on gaze cues from own-race than other-race adults for learning under uncertainty”, published in Child Development, researchers found that six- to eight-month-old infants were more inclined to learn information from an adult of his or her own race than from an adult of a different race.

(In both studies, infants less than six months of age were not found to show such biases).

Steve Sailer quipped, “So there’s hope for humanity after all: we just have to keep human beings perpetually at a mental age of five months.”

The study authors — the very Anglospheric Kang Lee and Naiqi Xiao — say that this infant own-race favoritism occurs so early in life (long before significant exposure to other races) that “negative experiences” with other races can’t explain the cognitive bias. Racism — or what is better framed as race-based love — is in our genes. We aren’t “taught” race-based love, we are born with it. And likely for a very good evolutionary reason: being able to distinguish your tribe members from another tribe’s members increased your odds of survival. Infants appear to come pre-programmed with a favoritism for own-race adults because those adults are more likely than other-race adults to nurture and love them.

Of course, instead of accepting race-based love as normal and psychologically healthy, the researchers (steeped as most of them are in Equalist tripe) present the findings as proof that racism can be fought with extremely early intervention.

“These findings thus point to the possibility that aspects of racial bias later in life may arise from our lack of exposure to other-race individuals in infancy,” Dr. Lee said.

Study results could be significant in prevention of racial bias

He continued to explain that overall, the results of these studies are critically important given the issues of wide-spread racial bias and racism around the world.

“If we can pinpoint the starting point of racial bias, which we may have done here, we can start to find ways to prevent racial biases from happening,” he said.

That last quote is chilling. “…if we can pinpoint the starting point of racial bias….we can start to find ways…” Final solutions, if you will. Only for White infants, though. That was always the plan.

The leftoid hivemind is revealed in all its totalitarian evil. Race-based love is part of the human condition; our Equalist Underlords are dehumanists, wishing to cleanse the world of its humanity and replace it with a dehumanized slurry of deracinated emotionless self-deluding automatons feeding the atomized consumerist borg. One lazy thoughtcrime drifting through your head, though, and its off to the reeducation camps, where you’ll join the White infants having the “racist” parts of their brains excised.

As a Sailer commenter ominously noted,

Eugenics, anyone?

The picture at the top of the original article “Infants show racial bias toward members of own race and against those of other races” suggests that these are the white infants who exhibit racial bias.

It appears that this study aims at finding ways to re-engineer the white race so that it no longer is capable to engage in any racial discrimination, like the reluctance to be displaced by highly fertile non-whites. I am sure the authors will deny it, but such a conclusion must be obvious to those with enough IQ and cognitive curiosity.

How about fixing other “birth defects” of (some) white babies, like propensity to seek individual freedom, and disdain towards collectivism? That would ultimately eliminate the last standing obstacles for the construction of a neo-Marxian world of racial justice and the redistributive political system (based on the dictatorship of “minorities”) that it will require.

And, if nothing else works well, how about lobotomy?

Anyway, for those who remember eugenics research, the article “Infants show racial bias toward members of own race and against those of other races” may be disturbing.

Some of you may be wondering if this baby racism study has simply restated the principle of imprinting. Keep in mind that imprinting itself is an evolved trait and therefore heritable and at least partly genetic in origin. Evolution has given us imprinting so that as babies we don’t make the mistake of willy-nilly latching onto whichever Somali migrant happens to be nearby. As adults, we “imprint” to racial kin as well, as anyone can see with a quick trip through a high school or college cafeteria, because we share attitudes, behaviors, and temperaments with racial kin and this shared experience creates positive feedback loops which strengthen the imprinting.

Leftoids hate this, and will do anything to change it, because underneath their abstract rationalizations is the truth of the matter: leftoids hate truth and beauty.

Read Full Post »

Decodewords

A gay homosexual lying leftoid columnist for the Washington Bezos (but I repeat myself all over the place) psychologically projects his neuroses and his tribe’s rhetorical inclinations onto the Alt-Right, claiming (while lacking any self-awareness) that it is the Alt-Right (now the mainstream Right) which strategically tries to control the discourse.

A commenter at Steve Sailer’s nails this Amazon drone rainborg warrior to the bathhouse wall, correctly interpreting his smear job of the Alt-Right as a rearguard frenzy of sophistry deployed when the happy enemy is bearing down on his citadel of delusion.

Petrow’s article completely misses the point about Alt Right and ‘code words’. Those terms that the Alt Right uses are NOT codewords. Codewords are secret words that only insiders can decipher or pick up.

Alt Right lingo are NOT codewords. They are OBVIOUS in meaning.

Rise of Alt Right has to do with their power to DECODE the PC that is all around us. It is PC that uses CODEWORDS and manipulative iconography. For instance, PC promoted homo stuff by equating it with the rainbow.

Now, what does homos doing their ‘sex’ or trannies cutting off balls have to do with the rainbow? Nothing. Rainbow is beautiful. A homo act is not. A man with a cut-off penis and fake vagina is not beautiful. But homo agenda coded homosexuality with the rainbow to fool people.
Alt Right has the clarity to see homosexuality for what it is. It has NOTHING to do with the rainbow. That is a trick from advertisement where you associate something with something… like how ads used to associate smoking with beautiful women… when, in fact, smoking ruins a woman’s beauty.

Alt Right gained some traction because it says it like it is. It sees the reality of race and says so. It sees the reality of Jewish power and says so. It sees the reality of black crime and says so. It doesn’t use code words like ‘teens’ or ‘youths’. For Alt Right, a man with a wig pretending to be a woman is a man with a wig pretending to be a woman. He is not a ‘she’ or one of the 50 coded genders that gets ever so ‘creative’.

Here are some codewords used by PC and Progs.

Gentrification. This is codeword for de-negro-ification or denegrification. It’s really about using economic muscle to drive out blacks to create upscale communities for yuppies who are mostly white, Jewish, and Asian. But ‘gentrification’ sound so much nicer.

Black Lives Matter. It’s really codeword for “We blacks are tired of homos and trannies getting all the attention under Obama, who is supposed to be a Black President. We are sick of being sent to back of the bus. We want attention and respect!”

Stop and Frisk: It’s really STOP AND FRISK THE NEGRO as cities that use this tactic mostly target blacks because they are more violent and criminal.

Dreamer: Illegal alien kid whose parents violated US laws.

Refugee: Muslim victims of US-instigated wars in the Middle East that turned nations upside down. The very globalists who pushed all these wars and wrecked Iraq, Syria, and Libya now posture as humanitarians who feel so much compassion for these poor poor Muslims. But why are Muslims displaced? Cuz Bush wrecked Iraq, Obama wrecked Libya and Syria.

Rape Culture: This is hysteria cooked up by globo media to spread the bogus narrative that blonde jocks are raping white women in colleges. It is to drive wedge between white men and white women. The most dangerous rapists in colleges are black athletes.

Reagan’s Indifference: This is a codeword to cover up the fact that the MAIN reason why all those homos died in the AIDS epidemic was because they went wild and were buggering each other in bathhouses. But since homos are holy and can’t be held accountable for anything, PC cooked up ‘Reagan’s indifference’ for all those AIDS death.

New Cold War: Jewish War on Russia because of soreness over the fact that Putin rolled back some Jewish oligarchal power after the 90s.

This is why Alt Right got some traction. Not because it uses codewords but because it uses ‘decodewords’, the key that unlocks the ceaseless BS of fake news PC.

This Alt Right pieces gets to the heart of the matter on race differences.

It’s like what Robert Weissberg wrote. Alt Right are like kids that discovered Santa isn’t real. And they say so.

http://www.unz.com/article/why-is-the-alt-right-so-threatening/

The Maul-Right has pointed at the Equalism Narrative and precociously announced it has no clue. The Left are livid at their religion being so brazenly exposed for the pack of lies it is, but their envy of the Maul-Right’s freedom of thought may rival their outrage as objects of Maul-Right ridicule.

It burns GoodWhite leftoids that they have to expend so much cognitive capital hewing to codewords and poopytalk to vent their spleens against the ravages of Diversity. It kills them inside that they have to speak in Fake Rhetoric to, in effect, hide their rank hypocrisy not only from BadWhites but from themselves.

The labia-wrapped Left is split wide open by the meaty intrusions of Realtalk Crusaders laying waste to their worldview; the penetration is so deep that the Left’s id is poked, and has to invent all sorts of twisted reality-inverting rationalizations to prop up their glowing self-conception as moral leaders. They would prefer their pussyhatted sinecures as culture guardians unmolested by better, stronger men, but now that authentic barbarians are at their gated retreats they have no choice but to make themselves look silly tied up by their own pretzel logic in vain efforts to maintain their increasingly irrelevant and besieged priestly stations.

The anti-White Left is being decoded by hate-poets and shiv artists for all the world to clearly see them for what they are: corrupt and incestuous curators of a discredited and dying dogma. Naturally, they don’t like their underbellies splayed for public viewing by vivisectionists who wield with equal precision the scalpel and the chainsaw, so they squeal like stuck pigs, futilely, feebly, and desperately, for one more day to live it up at the trough of self-admiration.

That day isn’t coming for them. This day, the barbarians feast on bacon.

Read Full Post »

The “Doe-Eyed Suffering Child” Test Of Leadership

Every administration member should have to pass a “doe-eyed suffering child” test. If he or she can’t look at a photo of a suffering child without starting a war, they’re automatically disqualified from participating in national security decisions.

Naturally, this will rule out 99% of women from public service.

***

Reader (and now Gabber) PA adds,

They all pass the “doe-eyed suffering child test” when the child is Swedish.

Or French. Remember that photo of the tarp-covered French child after an Islamofreak rammed his truck into a crowd of French parade-goers? Our Globohomo leaders weren’t shouting for war with Greater Gutterabia. In fact, just the opposite….the scumbags were calling for MORE immigration of Muslims into the West.

Good things happen to bad people and bad things happen to good people all over the world all the time. It’s not the job of America to play God meting out justice. If every suffering child was cause for military intervention by America, we’d be balls-deep in civil wars and tribal conflagrations in the four corners of the world for eternity, or until our coffers finally dried up and we could no longer afford the luxury of preening moral profligacy.

You reading, Ivanka?

Read Full Post »

The Souldead Shitlib

The Heritage America Resistance should know its enemy is the army of souldead shitlibs with ugliness in their hearts, minds, and nearly as often, their faces and physiques. Carthagian explains,

Scott Adams said the Bernie Sanders ad set to a Simon and Garfunkel tune was the best persuasion of the primaries. It was all American identity. Lots of whites. It felt like the 80s. In their hearts, most normal people want to MAGA. What’s so great about this new Welcome Back America idea is that even the shitlibs are susceptible to having their hearts and souls stirred by imagery of healthy white intact loving families. Then they catch themselves and remember that they are supposed to hate that beauty, not be moved by it. But that 2 second process highlights that ugliness in their hearts, to them, and, even more importantly, to normies. A similar thing happened with the TV show The Man in the High Castle. The ads showed intact German families in America and it looked so appealing that the advertisers were accused of celebrating the Nazis!

That’s insightful. Shitlibs can recognize beauty on a primal level, but instead of appreciating and enjoying that beauty for what it is, and being moved to aspire to similar beauty or contemplate the truth inherent in it, the psychologically disfigured and physically ugly shitlib’s immediate reaction is to deny their deepest longing and lash out at the display of beauty, and everything it represents. The shitlib witnesses beauty, feels a quick twinge of authenticity brighten his blackened soul, and panics at the meaty intrusion of Truth. In a swoon of existential crisis, he will frantically tamp down his incipient warm glow, and as a balm for his pricked ego will demean the Beauty as “sap” or “racism” or “Nazism”.

This is why shitlibs tirelessly spend so much mental energy elevating Lies and Ugliness to moral directives. They wear their degeneracy like armor and shield, protecting from harmony outside them and from dissonance within them. The moment they stop crusading for L&U, their vampiric flanks sizzle under the light of truth.

Read Full Post »

Sex Denialism And Race Denialism

Sex Denialism — the false belief that there are no innate psychological, cognitive, or even physical differences between the sexes.

Race Denialism — the false belief that there are no innate physical, psychological, or cognitive differences between the races.

Sex Denialism and Race Denialism are the two Foundational Lies which together provide the sustaining mythology for the false religion of Equalism, a cult of modernity that has captured almost the entirety of the Left but also has accumulated followers from the Right. Equalism’s guiding principle is the Commandment that there shall be no God but the God of Interchangeable Sexes and Interchangeable Races, and that Noticing any Differences between the Sexes and Races is Heresy. Man is Woman, Black is White, Beauty is Ugliness, Truth is Lies. Amen.

Conservatives and liberals are in thrall to Equalism, but it is predominately an ego affliction of liberals. The numbers of conservatives joining the Synathedral/Hivemind of Equalism is rising, though, and we call these conservatives “cucks”. True believers can be found on both sides, but the zealots and shock troops for Equalism are almost all from the Left, willing puppets of their Globohomo Bathhouse Alliance masters.

Sex Denialism is a myth held dear by both feminists and conventional or traditional conservatives (tradcons). The most fervent believers in Sex Equivalency are usually of the Femme Left (Antifemme), but tradcon diehard adherents aren’t uncommon. For instance, one will often hear a tradcon parrot feminist boilerplate whenever the subject turns to the sexual market and sex differences in romantic yearning, mating preference, and arousal trigger points.

Race Denialism is largely a creature of the Fake Morality Left, but which recently has had an influx of emotionally weak cucks from the Right. It is a prayerbook full of both banal and exotic incantations that when intoned serve to increase the social status of the believer and intensify religious feeling and tribal affiliation. We can see the tribal contours of Race Denialism in the fortitude and zeal with which followers chase down and burn at the stake any apostates. This animus for nonbelievers contrasts ironically with the Left’s personal avowals of belief in the equal worth of man, putting the lie to the very heart of what they claim to believe. This is how you know that the Left and Cucked Right will never be dislodged from their false religion solely with appeals to logic or reason. They must be psychologically crushed and culturally purged.

The Alt-Right — and if I may be so insolent, Chateau Heartiste from the very beginning —  are a force because it is the only movement in the West today that comes close to repudiating Sex Denialism and Race Denialism, which makes it a revolutionary vanguard undermining the One, True religion of Equalism. Hence, the frantic hack jobs and smear campaigns and doxxings and boycotts and firings and blacklists and Social Justice Silencings waged by the Globohomoists and their archipelago of misfit manlets against anyone even tangentially affirming, aiding, or abetting Sex and Race Realtalk barbarians tearing down stone by stone the Palace of Pretty Lies.

Read Full Post »

Single White Women Are The Undertow Of Heritage America

Betrayal is everywhere during the time of decline. This won’t come as news to some of you, it will certainly shock many others, and it will incense those who shirk from ugly truths about sex differences:

Single White women are the undertow dragging Heritage White America into the murky depths. Audacious Epigone teased out the 2016 election numbers and found that single White women OF ANY AGE were the outlier of all White voter demographics, significantly preferring thecunt to theTrump.

Single White men, married White men, married White women, any age: TRUMP COUNTRY

Single White women, any age: THECUNTRY

As the Bigly Epigone commented,

The Narrative was that white women betrayed “the sisterhood” by (modestly) preferring Trump.

The real story is that single white women betrayed white America and almost got away with it.

Thank you, single White ladies, sluts and spinsters alike, for showing your true colors this past election in your indomitable quest to drive America right over the cliff into Diversigeddon, because Trump’s tough talk hurt your feelings. Please feel free to menstruate your Fake Morality in some more airports with crayola signs welcoming rapefugees into your neighbor’s neighborhood. It’s clarifying.

Everything that’s happening is proving the wisdom of the CH maxims. Single White women unable or unwilling to marry and mother before the Wall makes the choice for them will vote gibs in the form of Daddy Government as substitute beta bux husband. The modern sexual market, deliberately stripped of the quasi-patriarchal organic rules that used to restrain it in White homelands, incentivizes a prolonged sexual precociousness among economically self-sufficient single White women, and embitters the older single White women who bought one too many tickets for the cock carousel and forgot to redeem them for a beta desperado willing to overlook the goods that are damaged.

All other Whites — INCLUDING single White men — voted for the preservation of their nation as a recognizable territory which honors them and their ancestors and promises their posterity the privileges of ownership.

This betrayal will only get worse, too, if the marriage rate among Whites continues to fall and the age of first marriage continues to rise, effectively increasing the relative total US population of single White women PRECISELY AT A TIME when the nonWhite US population is also increasing, amplifying and weaponizing the single White women political preference for psychocunts and mulatto misfits who brazenly advocate for the overrun of America by the nonmagical Dirt World.

Ok, Heritage America has identified the betrayers and subverters: Jews, gays, single White women, and nonWhites. The question that begs itself is this: how does Heritage America reclaim its inheritance from these usurpers within?

Runaway Jewish power can be slowed down by simply calling out their bad behavior and tribal antagonism in no uncertain terms. This won’t change their attitudes, but it will put a damper on their chutzpah if they know that they’ve lost control of the Narrative Megaphone to cow and silence their critics under fusillades of slickly sophistic legerdemain. Fortunately, there seems to me a small but growing chorus of sensible diaspora Jews who, however tentatively, have begun holding their co-ethnics to account for their rabid anti-Gentilism.

Homo power is also reliant on the Megaphone, but insinuates itself more thoroughly via cultural channels like the arts and social media. They, too, will never change their stripes but their electoral impact can be mitigated by culturally isolating them, which is accomplished whenever and wherever their diseased influence is spotlit and ridiculed with extreme rhetorical prejudice.

The above two groups have in cultural power what they lack in numerical power. Thankfully, there are limits to the effectiveness of anti-White propaganda; like hypnotists, you have to push your COGDIS agitprop to a partly receptive audience for it to take a strong hold on the nation’s psyche. Which brings us to….

NonWhites. They have numerical power and a gluttony for anti-White hatred. Globohomo White-hating propaganda finds a cozy home in the nonWhite id. They won’t change, and they can’t be persuaded by the usual means of power politics. The best you can do is stop their invading forces at the border and reduce their numbers already here by keeping their families together and deporting mothers with their anchor babies. The goal is to reduce the nonWhite population in America to a manageable number, ideally less than 30% of the total, and sequestered on Democreep gerrymandered farms that have no chance of overriding the national will.

Finally, we arrive at the one anti-White group that is, theoretically, amenable to a change of heart, if for no other reason than that they, like their married sisters, brothers, fathers, and sons, must sail subconscious eddies that continually and insistently push them toward a blood and soil genetic reconciliation with who they are as a people. Are single White women capable of going the Full Betrayal and turning the homeland of their own people into a decrepit technosmut street bazaar? Or will they, at the last second, feel the pulse of ancient rhythms and stand with their tribe when extinction — the Final Wall — threatens to end their sex and the diversity funtime?

Single White women are the lovers of White men and the wombs of White nations. No matter how badly lunacy grips them in the voting booth, they can’t be stopped at the border, nor can they be sidelined to political irrelevancy. Their numbers are huge and growing, and their necessary intimacy with White men and shared formative years with married White women means that those of us with clear-eyed future-vision of idiocratic America understand there is no other option but to try and find a way to coax single White women back onto the preservation.

Repealing the 19th is unrealistic at this time. Long-term, only radical changes to the structure of mass society will thwart the compulsion of single White women to betray what is in essence their extended family. I’m talking a whiplash of decentralization, possibly triggered by another Constitutional crisis, that limits geographic and economic mobility and restores local community watchdog influence over the choices of unmarried women.

Short term, the solution is mockery. Single White women, more than any other White demographic, fear social ostracism. Identifying a few of their worst offenders and holding them up to public ridicule will serve as a lesson for the others; lemmings can have their suicidal neurosis rerouted to stampede in a more advantageous direction. Sexually dimorphic Trump Girls and the Trump men who playfully tease them are the wedge that can be driven into the single White women herd to separate the loser antifemmes from the White shivladies.

It is beyond arguing that suffrage pushed the country to the Left. Maybe this was a good thing in the distant past, but it’s stupid to believe that White women voting would push the country just a little Left, and then stop. What has occurred is that White women pushed it Left, and kept pushing. Unchecked, single White women seem destined to push Leftward until an unapologetic Rightward pimp hand applies a stinging rebuke. The ultimate female shit test — autogenocide — answered by the ultimate shit test neutralizer: alphatude.

It is by now an academic argument whether married White women vote like their White men because marriage selects for emotionally stable White women with a common-sensical approach to the future, or if marriage (and presumably childbirth) itself calms the emotional roller coaster of a woman’s mind and allows her a better comprehension of what is at stake. Whether cause or symptom, the solution to the betrayal of our single White women is to whisk them out of the anonymous, contraceptively padded, libarts degree-greased, urban foreplayground and into marriage and children sooner rather than later in life. The cock carousel spins in only one direction: centrifugal molecularization, until the center axle cracks and the ride is closed for repairs. Women dispirited by the ride are nevertheless chained to it by Darwinian compulsions beyond their ken. It’s up to men and wiser women to pull the brake and escort the single ladies off the pump-and-go-round before it becomes a hyperloop to self-destruction.

A reader passes along an old yet apropos Cheyenne saying:

“The Cheyenne people have a saying: A nation is never conquered until the hearts of its women are on the ground.”

The women want to give their bodies to the conquerors.

If the men around them are feminized, they will seek out conquerors to give their bodies to.

Feminized men get masculinized women, and a weakening nation teetering on implosion.

Masculine men get feminine women, and a confident nation full of robust health.

Sexual polarity will make America great again.

Read Full Post »

The Innocent Victims Of Feminism Are Boys

Feminism is a disease that afflicts everyone, including women, but the twisted ideology’s truly innocent victims are boys. Reader Passer By links to a Carlos Slim Personal Blog article on the “decline of men”. He comments,

Btw, just learned about some interesting studies, posted at the (((NYT)))

Basically they argue that single motherhood weakened mostly the male children, because the sisters in such one parent families perform better in life than the brothers. In normal families, there is no difference or brothers perform better.

In other words, the lack of father harms more the male child than the female child. Therefore if you want to weaken men, push for single motherhood. No wonder jews try to destroy the family in the West, while simultaneously strengthening the family in Israel. There is deliberate push to decrease male influence in western society because jews feel threatened by white males, and by their innate nationalism.

So the next time a woman tells you that there aren’t enough good men, you can answer her: there aren’t enough good men because they were raised by women.

That’s a great truth Passer By wrote. There aren’t enough good men because they were raised by women. Trigger the shit out of any feminist or mangina lackey you come across on twatmedia with that stone cold shiv, and link to the relevant study.

From the CSPB article,

In a 2016 paper, David Autor, an economist at M.I.T., and four co-authors, measured academic and economic outcomes of brothers and sisters in Florida born in the decade between 1992 and 2002.

For boys and girls raised in two-parent households, there were only modest differences between the sexes in terms of success at school, and boys tended to earn more than their sisters in early adulthood.

Among children raised in single-parent households, however, boys performed significantly less well than their sisters in school, and their employment rate as young adults was lower. “Relative to their sisters,” Autor and his collaborators wrote, “boys born to disadvantaged families” — with disadvantage measured here by mother’s marital status and education — “have higher rates of disciplinary problems, lower achievement scores, and fewer high-school completions.”

When the children in the study reached early adulthood, the same pattern emerged in employment:

Employment rates of young women are nearly invariant to family marital status, while the employment rates of young adult men from non-married families are eight to ten percentage points below those from married families at all income levels.

Autor and his co-authors conclude that family structure “is more consequential for the skills development and labor market outcomes of boys than girls.”

This study is more interesting than the run-of-the-mill research recapitulating the detrimental effects of single mommery (a major cause celebre of mainstream feminism), because its structure seems to obviate any potential genetic influence into sex-differentiated life outcomes. That is, if genetics were the cause, then the sisters of brothers in single mom broken families would have similarly poor outcomes and behavioral problems. But instead what the researchers found was that single mommery disproportionately affected the life outcomes of boys, leaving their sisters largely untouched (at least as measured by SES outcome and delinquency rate) by the single mommery postindustrial complex.

This isn’t to say genetics aren’t a factor in the shitshow that is single mommery, but it does suggest environmental pressures inherent to single mommery are at least partly to blame for making life harder on boys.

It’s just more evidence that feminism has been, and continues to be, a Hate Machine dedicated to churning out Big Lies about the sexes and about their roles in society, with the express purpose of handicapping boys and men and lavishing extreme favoritism and government largesse on girls and women.

It’s silly to argue feminism is a symptom, rather than a cause, of a broken society when its agenda has directly contributed to so much social disruption, antagonism, distrust, resentment, and national decline. This is like arguing Marxism, Freudianism, Communism, SCALE, and GloboHomoism are symptoms of some deeper, underlying, corrupting force that bedevils the West. Large, society-spanning movements are as much cause as symptom of social degeneration. We’re splitting vellus hairs here.

If one wants to argue for a First Cause of the West’s decline, the most promising culprit would be Hajnalianism, but for some reason those who find SCALE objectionable rarely tackle the subject of inherited empathobesity.

Feminism as a distinctive movement really got started as a vanity project of masculinized or otherwise oddball women who were for various reasons uncomfortable in the world of women. Its leaders — and one shouldn’t neglect to mention the preponderance of feminist leaders were and are Jewish women and their co-tribal male suckups — were able to leverage their gripes to a wider audience of women who had become frustrated and flustered and, in plenty of cases, enthused, by the postindustrial revolution shocks to the social system that, critically, severed fecundity from sex and community from individual.

There was never a feminist movement that had its origins in widespread complaints about male discrimination against working women. That is a myth. Pre-20th Century Western women worked plenty, either on the home or off it. Wives working as apprentices to their husbands’ businesses was fairly common in Medieval Europe.

What feminism has been, and what it remains today, is a propaganda howitzer to mow down the natural order and replace it with an inverted dystopia in which the defining feature is the removal of all constraints on female sexuality and the maximization of restrictions on male sexuality. As in any social movement, the breath of its life emerges first from the sticky goo of the sexual market.

Lies have consequences, and the Big Lies of Feminism and Antiracism have destroyer-of-worlds consequences. They must be fought with a vengeance.

Read Full Post »