Canada Is Pathologically Gay

Canadians are gay. And gullible, and naive, and sanctimonious, and gay, and stupid, and willfully ignorant, and gay, and sappy, and childishly sentimental, and dopey, and did I mention gay?

Evidence:

1. The Truvada government’s Advisory Council on Economic Growth wants 100 million Canadians by the end of the 21st Century. They intend to do this by boosting annual immigration to 450,000. (Canada’s new slogan: “Pozzed and smug about it“.)

2. A cornhole of dumb, virtue signaling Canadians adopted a Syrian refugee couple, who refused to learn English and promptly agitated to have fifty more of their inbred extended family colonize Canada. The Anti-Gnostic’s comment hits the bulls-eye:

I didn’t wade thru that whole tongue bath of an article but it’s pretty obvious where this is headed: more, and more fecund, prole-class Arab Muslims for Canada. Most will be net tax consumers. Some will be Islamic militants. Most will be frustrated in a cold, white, high-trust country with lots of taxes and regulation (which they will ignore). They will recreate the social structures of the old country with the transfer payments from their new one. Canadians who ask, how much is this going to take will learn the answer: everything you offer, then they’ll ask for more, then they’ll vote it for themselves. It will all end in tears.

Dumbfuck Canadians have the same GAY disease that the other Anglo-Germanic countries have (except more acutely metastasized): Race creationism. Until and if Gaynadians stop believing in the shitlibboleth of race equalism, they will continue to import more of these mud world ingrates and they will screw their White posterity who will be forced to live in a land that is less Canada and more Trashcanistan, eternally and intractably hostile to their cuck Canadian values.

Read Full Post »

Early Voting, Inaccurate Polling, And Diversity

Early voting and other nontraditional methods of voting such as absentee and mail-in ballot have been trending rapidly upward since at least 1996. The early voting trend is most pronounced in battleground states like FL and NC (this is important…see below*). The only nontraditional method of voting that saw a decrease has been “absentee voting with an excuse”. Basically, a lot of states have made it easier for residents to vote early (and vote twice). Goodbye, America, the series.

Widespread early voting adds layers of complexity to polling and to predictions of election day results. Nontraditional voting weeks in advance of an election means that polling agencies are either wildly off due to faulty inputs in their models (GIGO) or because they are emotionally biased to favor the Democreep Party, early voting (among other tricks of the trade) gives them the cover they need to rig their polls in an effort to demoralize and depress the turnout of the opposition.

It’s hard to say which Party benefits more from early voting, or how early voting may or may not be a leading indicator of election day voting. Relevant data is difficult to find, but generally Democreeps vote early in larger numbers than do Republicans. Polling based on early voting is notoriously inaccurate. In the 2012 Gay Mulatto-Magic Cuckerwear election, predictions based on early voting tallies were badly off.

But really it looks like early voting isn’t indicative of who typically wins the state in fact in a lot of states it’s the opposite, whoever wins early voting loses the state. It seems that Dems have the advantage in early voting because they bus people in as is happening in Nevada. Dems have always been good at rounding up the chimps and giving them vouchers for some Nike’s and moving them to some place to stage a protest or fill out a ballot.

Early voting numbers seem to just indicate which party is blowing their load before election day.

There are some current early voting results to back up the theory that Democreeps blow their GOTV wad early and fade as Election Day draws nearer. For instance, in FL the Dem early voting advantage decreased by over 9,000 votes from the first to second day of voting.

*It’s no coincidence that early voting is becoming the norm in battleground states like FL, NC, and AZ. It’s in these states where racial Diversity is either entrenched or making quick inroads. The Diversity is the reason these states are battlegrounds at all.

So why are more Americans (and Mexicans squatting here) voting early in national US elections? My theory:

Diversity + Proximity = Make the Vote Remote.

Diversity™ causes societal breakdown. The more Diversity, the lower the social cohesion and the more disconnected people feel from one another. Everyone feels more distrustful of their neighbors. Voting on Election Day is the kind of national ritual that Americans share with one another. But when America is a multikult dystopia, the national rituals lose meaning. People come to view these sacred duties as a chore instead of a time to reinforce one’s identity as an American, because they look around and ask, rightfully, “What identity exactly am I supposed to feel a part of?”.

There are plenty of socially atomized White Urban Shitlibs who are voting early, and they give all sorts of anodyne reasons (“my schedule is hectic”) but I suspect the real reason they’re voting early, a reason they will never admit to anyone even themselves, is that they find the idea of going to a polling station in the not-yet-fully-gentrified Section 8 zone of their hipster enclave to vote side by side with the vibrancy a dreary proposition.

Data on voters’ reasons for early voting is sparse, but one recent survey found that half of likely US voters are concerned about Election Day violence.

That’s another cost of Diversity: violence. And intolerance. And irreconcilable hatreds. So why is the ruling class inviting more Diversity into our homeland?

***

FYI this is why it’s better to viciously mock SJWs rather than reason with them. The cunty SJW is immune to logic and reason. Rationality slides off her like sanity slips free of her cortical bonds.

***

This made me laugh and retch simultaneously:

Read Full Post »

A WikiLeaks Crib Sheet (because it’s getting hard to keep track of Hillary Clinton’s corrupt dealings)

The daily drumbeat of new leaks have made this list far from exhaustive, but it’s still a good start for red pilling normies and shame pilling shitlibs. Clinton’s corruption is so widespread and entrenched even a thorough executive summary of her wrongdoing would fill an encyclopedia.

Read Full Post »

Is Julian Assange Still Alive?

Strange happenings swirl around WikiLeaks. First, Julian Assange’s internet access is cut (and John Kerry, at the behest of thecunt campaign, is implicated).

Second, a WikiLeaks cofounder, Gavin MacFadyen, died a couple of days ago, cause of death unknown (and none given by WikiLeaks…suspiciously, the original death notice included the snippet that he died from “a short illness”, which was later edited with that snippet removed). He was 76, but appeared in good health. MacFadyen had said earlier in the year that the 2016 election would be “very dangerous” to people involved with WikiLeaks.

From TOG:

Back in August 2016, some mysterious man was scaling the outside of the building where Assange was sleeping & living at the time.  I believe this was when Assange was actually assassinated by the CIA.  All the leaks have been coming from Gavin Macfadyen since August 22nd.  An actor playing Julian Assange made a recent appearance in a live stream , but this was just to reassure everyone that nothing happened in Ecuador and Julian is still alive.  The broadcast was very hard to hear, audio was very grainy.  They had to do a live stream b/c it was announced when Julian was alive, so they had to follow through with it or it would look like Julian was dead.  This was obviously a cover up job. And now after this latest round of wikileaks releases showing Clinton paid for violent protesters (a crime), the CIA went in and stopped any future leaks from happening.  You see, recently the CIA took over the wikileaks account on twitter when the wikileaks founder,  Gavin Macfadyen, suddenly showed up dead.

Finally, followers of the WikiLeaks Twatter account are saying that for the last couple of weeks the tweets from the account have sounded strange, almost as if it was sabotaged and commandeered by someone intent on thwarting further email releases that would be damaging to thecunt’s and soros’s One World Borg ambitions.

WikiLeaks has yet to confirm that Assange is alive.

Anyone of probing mind would think all of these “””coincidences””” are highly suspect and worth investigation by journalists with integrity. Unfortunately, according to donation data, 96% of journalists are zero integrity shills in the tank for the Clinton campaign, grabbing her pussy like it’s the only connection they have to the material world.

Is Assange alive? If not, the people want to know, Secretary Clinton…did you or a campaign surrogate order the assassination of Julian Assange?

***

This was a dark and serious post. Time for something just a little less dark and serious.

Read Full Post »

The Life Cycle Of The White Urban Shitlib (WUS)

I loved this comment by TicklingTimeBomb describing the Life Cycle of the White Urban Shitlib (WUS for short).

I live in the urban educated white demographic being talked about here.

If I had to hazard an anecdotally-informed guess, it’d go something like this:

Urban educated whites start families very late. So they spend a LONG time without kids, often with good or great jobs, enjoying all sorts of DINK goods and services that cities can provide. And their views on government are often, mostly, at the level of abstractions and virtue signalling. And a lot of them are in the weird situation that they have quite a lot of disposable income, which means they feel pretty economically secure from one vantage point… which leads them to having lots of moral outrage about the plight of minorities who are their neighbors (from a few neighborhoods over) and who use the failing schools and suffer all the gang violence. So they feel Privileged. [ed: the source of tikkun olam] And yet on the other hand, they also feel incredibly economically pinched, because of insane housing prices, and student loan debt, and the need (down the road) for paying for private schools, which contributes hugely to them putting off family formation, along with social norms from their peers about it not being a big deal to start families late, and to have few children.

If you’re this person, the idea that government should step in and make it easier for you to start a family is pretty understandable. It sucks to be hitting your mid/late 30′s and thinking your life is just on hold for ever. OF COURSE, you’re actually right in this case. You SHOULD be looking to government to step in… because in the places where people can afford houses, like in major Texas cities, government absolutely does play a huge role in setting zoning, tax, and regulatory regimes that are pro-growing-the-middle-class housing supply. Ironically.

What I have seen, over and over, is that white educated urban dwellers have their first kid, weather a year or two trying to make it work, and then either their kids gets too big for their apartment and starts needing school, or the lack of yards starts grating, or they have a second kid, and they end up giving up, and abandoning the city. And then they move out to the suburbs, have their attitudes change, start seeing the other side of policy discussions because they now have kids and so have skin in the game, and they’re now surrounded by neighbors with a different set of social norms about family and government – hell, maybe they even join the local megachurch because they think the socialization will be good for their kids. They might still be socially liberal in some sort of airy abstract way, but at a nuts-and-bolts level, their tax dollars are segregated to people like themselves. And because they’ve moved, the norms of the cities they’ve had to abandon remain basically static. These people’s attitudes and world views change, but they bring those changes with them somewhere else, only to be replaced by younger versions of themselves in the city with their former attitudes. It’s like a standing wave.

This isn’t just purely theory – I’ve watched this process happen with people I know a bunch of times.

It’s tragicomic ’cause it’s true.

The point about cities being essentially “standing waves” of shitliberalism is spot on, and the reason why densely-populated cities will never politically convert to light blue, let alone pink or red. (A good test case of this assertion is to create a new city along the coast populated with only very conservative people bussed in from middle America. Will the city gradually turn blue, or will it be the deep red of the people who moved there and enjoy its hedonistic escapes?)

Cities aren’t just population sinks; they’re shitlord sinks. Any starting population of shitlords in a city won’t be able to sustain itself because the shitlords will “boil off”, leaving for the suburbs or countryside where their values and aesthetic don’t provoke aneurysms in the locals.

Of course, the shitlord sink theory of urbanity competes with the theory of heritable political disposition, but my thinking is that inherited dispositions (and their relation to reproductive fitness) are positively or negatively affected by the Weltanshauung of one’s human habitat; i.e., gene-culture co-evolution.

The one child-per family formation of WUSes mathematically means that their population will halve each generation, eventually meaning their extinction. So how do the cities continue functioning if there are fewer WUSes every year who feel an affinity for the anonymous child-free fucking of city life? (“put condom dispensers in grade schools, BIGOT”)

OPEN BORDERS IMMIGRATION is one method cities are replenished. Another city replenishment program is accomplished through the anonymous urban environment acting as a matchmaking service substitute for what used to be the concern of parents, church, and community, drawing in prime age hotties and high horny level anime aficionados on the promise of endless unencumbered sex and romantic interludes while dining at sidewalk cafes (but don’t make eye contact with the glowering google strutting by!).

tl;dr There’s a reason the anti-White and anti-Heritage America globalists want to herd everyone into dense urban spaygrounds modeled after Calhoun’s rat experiments (which they sell by exploiting environmental concerns about “sprawl”). City life is a shitliberalism factory with a handy expiration date built-in for the hated native stock.

Read Full Post »

The Ugly Wife Theory Of Male Shitlib Hatred Of Normal Society

“The sexual market is the one market to rule them all” — CH

Whenever proposing big picture theories for ideological beliefs, I always refer to the sexual market and how the dynamics of reproductive fitness operating at the level of the hindbrain primarily influence higher order human interactions like social or political organization.

This came to mind while reading about (((Josh Marshall’s))) attack on the most un-hateful man on the internet, Steve Sailer.

One of the progenitors of alt-right racism denounces me. Hi steve. https://t.co/5seYMyT2k6

— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) October 23, 2016

(of course you’ll notice marshall never answered steve’s pinpoint charge against him, preferring instead to cry out in pain while flinging shit at steve, which is the wont of his evasive reptilian subspecies)

Anyhow, an astute Sailer commenter noted something about Josh Marshall that goes a long way to explaining his anti-Gentile bitterness.

Marshall’s bride looks like the result of some Semitic inbreeding program.

Lefties are always unhappy because of the women, by dint of they’re [sic] inherent dweebieness, they’re forced to be with.

All politics isn’t local. All politics is gonadal.

Male shitlibs generally are an effete bunch, and their masculine, ugly girlfriends and groace wives testify to that. A manlet stuck with an ugly woman will over the years build up a reservoir of caustic spite against masculine high T men and the feminine women who love them. Josh Marshall fits the stereotype perfectly. Many of his extended kin fit the stereotype perfectly.

In fact, the exceptions are so glaringly obvious that they prove the rule. The skype men who more closely resemble in face and physique the male Gentile aesthetic tend also to be less antagonistic toward Gentile culture and politics.

Executioner’s Summary: Physiognomy is creed.

***

plumpjack has a novel theory that connects vision quality with shitliberalism.

does poor vision predispose someone to liberal, immediate gratification-leaning politics? IOW, is there a link between actual vision acuity and future time-orientation?

where I grew up, very red area, and lots of hawk-eyed, self-sufficient folks. the coke-bottle lens-sporting folks were always in white collar-ish jobs, or on food stamps. now I live in one of the most shitlibby towns on the planet and I swear, I can barely find a single person who doesn’t wear glasses. I can glimpse through the side of their reality warping lenses and see just how totally fkd up their eyesight is. it’s scary.

it could also be that a person with poor vision feels more vulnerable and therefore favors gibs policies. or it could be that they literally and figuratively cannot see into the future.

this should be studied. (note: i apologize to any commenters here who wear coke bottle type glasses. no offense. I’m just raising the question.)

It’s absolutely true that liberals, especially the male of the species, are physically unimpressive in one or more ways compared to their shitlord brethren, and poor eyesight is a big tell of shitlibbery. A powerful correlation, but is it more than that, as plumpjack suggests? Adjusted for the White race, does poor vision directly alter feedback loops in the brain that dispose the liberal to prefer insta-feelz over grappling with the long-term consequences of their policies and governance?

Read Full Post »

What If The Rot Is So Deep The Truth Will Never See The Light Of Day?

Ripp comments on the WikiLeaks torrent that has proved beyond doubt thecunt’s criminal involvement with vote and poll rigging, incitement to violence at Trump rallies, and pay-for-play access to her State Department favor machine.

“If Assange did have some REAL dynamite”

Theres been plenty of dynamite. Plenty of election and campaign funding violations already.

But the rot is so deep it just doesnt matter.

This is a scary thought. What if Ripp is right (and the evidence of the past year certainly confirms his gloomy prognosis)?

What if the American media and major information gateways AND the US political establishment AND the FBI, CIA and NSA — all of them except a few lonely, croaking voices trying to break through the anti-white noise — are stocked rug to rafters with Clinton and Twerk and Fat Cat Party apparatchiks who glibly and gleefully ignore or suppress the truth about Clinton’s criminal activities and traffic in lies, misinformation, and blatant narrative propaganda to discredit her opponent?

What if the rot is so deep the truth has no way of reaching the light?

What if the incestuous evil and corruption in every American institution are so scrupulously shielded from scrutiny by the ruling class and their media whores that the Good and Righteous slumber silently to a sad and lonely death that goes unnoticed….worse, callously ignored….worse still, deliberately perpetrated…by those very same entities tasked with the duty to speak for the vulnerable and the powerless and expose the depredations of the powerful?

What if there is no Deep State…only ONE SOROSIAN STATE with interests diametrically opposed to the interests of the American people?

What if this ONE SOROSIAN STATE establishes itself so firmly and permanently in the American social and political fabric that the only outlets for truth are mischievous online retreats, tucked far away from mass consciousness? And when the SOROSIAN STATE achieves total victory, how long do you think Le Chateau will stand athwart cuckery yelling COWARD before WordPress is given the order to SHUT IT DOWN?

What if the rot….IS THE WHOLE POINT?

Evil doesn’t always lose.

Chairman Mao died a rich old man while still in office.

But I can tell you this.

Truth always wins, one way or another.

If truth doesn’t win from within the system (via the exposure of lies by the people’s guardians) then truth will win outside the system.

Outside the system is where the rivers of blood flow.

Read Full Post »