“This will not end well”

There are a couple of must-reads that were published this week. The first, by Kurt Schlichter, warns leftoids that their eagerness to silence dissent will strike back at them with a fury. Schlichter feels the passion of the shiv. You can tell because his article is sharp, hungry for leftoid vitals, and remorselessly allergic to the supine “to be sure”-isms which typify cuckservative mewlings.

But then, those concerns apparently aren’t worthy of attention. The news covers, day in and day out, some overeating foreigner and drug lord baby mama who Donald Trump was mean to a couple decades ago, but no reporter ever asks our guy about his problems. And they don’t merely ignore him. They come after him, jamming things down his throat like gender neutral bathrooms and murderous Muslim refugees and Wall Street scams that mean he gets about .001% interest on that money he saved just like the experts told him to. And he’s expected to just take it.

This will not end well.

It will end either with leftoid retreat or leftoid heads on stakes. The choice of fate is theirs.

***

The second article comes from the now-famous Publius Decius Mus, who whacks another two-by-four against the fiveheads of plush cucks like James Pethokoukis.

Whenever you find an article that begins with the title, “The Conservative Case” for or against something, lock your door, check your wallet, and grab your gun. You know what’s coming is an unadulterated sell-out of everything “conservatism” purports to hold dear.

***

Pethokoukis, like a good AEI-nik, would presumably dismiss such concerns as “the politics of envy” or some-such. True Conservatives™ don’t care about income inequality! The aggregate is what matters!

Matters to what? “The Economy?” Oh. Gains accruing to techies and hedge fundies are more than enough to offset losses everywhere else and that’s apparently good enough for Pethokoukis, who—like nearly all economists—bases his case on a narrow economic analysis that ignores the broader political sphere. Here we find another typical misinterpretation of Reagan. The Gipper’s successful policies proved that it’s all about incentives. All hail Homo economicus!

True, incentives matter. What do open borders and trade-giveaways incentivize blue collar workers in the heartland to do? Give up and shoot heroin?

***

Pethokoukis makes the highly unoriginal point that “Google, Facebook and Uber” show the continued dynamism of the U.S. economy. This is like John Kerry praising Apollo 11 in his acceptance speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Can’t think of anything to say? Moon shot! Oh, you’re talking about the economy? Google! Is any cliché more tired at this point? Google—actually Alphabet—has made a few people rich but otherwise has depressed high tech wages in Silicon Valley by its relentless importation, and advocacy for same, of foreign programmers who will work for less and transform neighborhoods through over-occupancy. All this to make porn searches more efficient. Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook is even more aggressive about screwing American workers—fwd.usa, anyone?—and his company even more useless. Uber promises to turn unemployed American workers, and untold foreigners, into cab drivers. But you hail them through a smartphone, so it’s high tech! These, and dozens more that Pethokoukis could have mentioned but mercifully did not, are far cries from the robber barons of old, who electrified the nation, linked us by rail, road, sea, and air, and built our greatest monuments. In the process, they employed millions, created wealth for tens of millions more, and improved standards of living for people on every rung of the ladder.

But for Pethokoukis, the true measure of national success is “translat[ing] entrepreneurial daring into wealth.” […] And what about the people who aren’t entrepreneurs and can’t be? Are they just losers? Does the wealth ever get to trickle down to them? That is, in the form of something other than lower iPhone prices?

***

Like all conservative Hegelians, Pethokoukis is endorsing, if implicitly, rule by the administrative state. “Truth” derives from scientific principle, which is published in academic “studies.” For their own good, the voters should not be allowed to contravene said “truth.” If the people don’t like current, academically endorsed immigration and trade policies, then the people are wrong. Which is manageable, as long as the political class successfully conspires to thwart their will. But when a “demagogue” comes along who threatens to implement the people’s will, that must be stopped!

***

The actual, political truth is that men are free “of all but moral law.” And there is no moral imperative for or against immigration or trade. If the people want them, they may lawfully enact them. If they don’t, they may restrict either, to the extent that their preferences in the moment dictate. Even if a consequence is that their economy contracts.

An economist will gasp at this heresy against his faith. But politics is greater and higher than economics. A failing economy might be a merely economic problem but a failing society is fundamentally a political problem.

***

The left rules out-of-bounds any discussion of the cultural or political effects of immigration as “racist,” and the conservatives go along. Hence they can only talk about immigration in economic terms, as if human beings were widgets.

Beautiful. This was a shiv aimed straight at the heart of Cheap Chalupas. I wonder how our favorite econo-autist is doing? He’s been on a “DAS RACISS” rearguard action lately, content to polish the knobs of various open borders leftoid freaks like Esssra Klein and Noah Smith. The Trumpening making him butthurt?

The rest of the article is even better than the excerpts I’ve quoted above. The closing sentence is absolutely killer. Read it in full and feel the force of a righteous revolution bearing down on the complacent, arrogant, smug equalist leftoid Hivemind and their cuckservative suck-up lackeys.

Read Full Post »

Why A Decadent, Corrupt Elite Attracts So Many Gay Men

Reader whorefinder zeroes in on the reason why late-stage ruling elites mired in corruption and decadence are coincidentally so freaking gay.

Gays are defective men, and their effeminacy leads them to value and excel in very female traits. What’s more, gays excel past women in these traits because their retained testosterone naturally makes them more competitive than women. Gays like careers where licentiousness, flashiness, graft, catfighitng and backroom politics rule the day, and not ones where team work, tangible-goal meeting, merit-based advancement and self-sacrifice are valued.

Politics in decadent cultures is all about social manipulation and not about accomplishment. In non-decadent cultures, politicians assess which general conquered effectively; whether the police are keeping crime down. In decadent cultures, politicians assess whether they will get a payoff for favoring a certain bill; whether they can make another rival look bad; and whether they can get away with it.

Hence gays will excel in a decadent political climate. Hence why D.C.’s politicians and power players are very fag-heavy.

Hadrian was the exception rape!

A great insight to which I would only add that low T heterosexual men also excel in decadent political climates marked by constant elite infighting. The same female instincts that motivate gay men appear in abundance in the low T man as well.

The solution to American decline is…. more T. Higher testosterone, whether exogenously administered or included as an intrinsic part of the shitlord package. Trump is a virile man with the visage and slash and burn rhetorical skillset of a shitlord. If anyone can un-gay DC, and America at large, it’s Trump.

***

Related, a study of people’s natural feelings of “homophobia” — or what should more precisely be termed homoaedia (“disgust for homosexuals”) — found that it’s an emotional immune system response to the often-correct presumption that gay men are untrustworthy, disloyal, and unreliable when the group needs to be defended against outside threats.

Perception of Gay Men as Defectors and Commitment to Group Defense Predict Aggressive Homophobia

Homophobia encompasses a variety of attitudes and behaviors with distinct causal paths. We focus on aggressive homophobia, a propensity to feel anger and express aggression toward gay men. We investigated the conjecture that homosexual males might be seen, in recent Western cultures, as defectors from collective group defense. We predicted that consistent with a functional motive to punish and deter free riding, the perception of gay men as defectors would motivate aggression toward gay men. We also predicted that individuals with greater commitment to group defense might show more aggressive homophobia (as these individuals have more to lose from the defection than individuals who are not committed to group defense). Study 1 showed that aggressive homophobia correlated positively with the tendency to implicitly associate gay men with defection from group defense. Study 2 showed that a tendency to punish homosexual males for a theft correlated positively with commitment to group defense. The findings suggest that coalitional psychology might contribute to explaining the existence and quality of certain kinds of social stigma.

The part I bolded is interesting from a post-America vantage point. Very homophilic urban shitlibs — masculine careerist shrikes and low T effete hipster men — have, to borrow a Sailer phrase, leap-frogging loyalties to people and races far beyond their neighbors and racial kin. This remote defense of genetically distant groups is perfect for liberals who prefer to signal their virtue rather than act according to their claimed virtues (by, say, raising their family in the ghetto). The shitlib thus lacks the instinct for in-group defense, and when he is roused to group-defense does so for the benefit of outgroups, and often for extremely antagonistic outgroups. This muted if not altogether missing disposition to ingroup defense is reflected in the typical shitlib’s nonchalance toward the disease and disloyalty threats that homosexuals present to the group.

In other words, the same reason shitlibs don’t much get worked up over elite betrayals and the demographic destruction of White America explains why they don’t feel much concern about homosexual subversion and defection. It’s stunted shitlib amygdalas all the way down.

On this topic of justifiable disgust, I frequently come across assertions by shitlib sociologists that disgust per se leads to the ostracism and “dehumanization” of homosexuals, minorities, women, etc ad nauseam, and that if people just stopped feeling disgusted the tikkun olam utopia would be achieved. But this claim always struck me as an ass-backwards rationalizing of a studiously manicured false leftoid equalist worldview.

Disgust is not itself a stimulus; disgust is the emotional reaction to a negative stimulus. The leftoid inversion of this reality presents hilarious logic traps when examined critically by analogy. Dog shit serves as a useful mindgunk cleanser. Does our natural disgust at the sight of dog shit “dehumanize” and “other” the shit, or is our disgust a reasonable reaction to the smell and appearance and disease-carrying threat of dog shit? Naturally, the latter. We evolved the disgust response to protect against curious ingestion of dog shit or playfully smearing our faces with dog shit.

The same is true of homosexuals. People, especially those enmeshed in strong local communities, know instinctively that homosexuals are disease and disloyalty vectors, and they react with the appropriate and natural feeling of disgust when flamboyant gay homosexuals attack their senses. It’s why Kaine has triggered so many disgust reflexes; physiognomy is real and gaypedoface physiognomy is about as disgusting to normal people as a toadstool sandwich with arsenic sauce. Or Michelle Obama’s traps.

***

The contrarian asks, “If disgust is so useful, why did evolution select for shitlibs with high disgust thresholds?” My answer is that disgust inhibition is probably associated with increased creativity. If there was an environment in the past that greatly rewarded creative people, then that could, generations later, result in a larger proportion of the population suffering from an underdeveloped insula region of the brain (where disgust is manufactured). But the pendulum always swings back; our current petri dish culture of shitty aesthetics and shitlib eagerness to wallow in filth long ago reached the point of diminishing creativity returns. Now that the leftoid filth is threatening to swallow us up and destroy everything our ancestors worked to create, evolution will strongly select for the re-emergence of a shitlord phenotype/genotype to bring balance to the force.

But if the reproductive and cultural selection pressures for a Shitlord Ascendance are too slow or weak, then we will run out of time to wash away the grime. System failure will have to proceed if a truthnbeauty rebirth can happen.

Read Full Post »

The Gay Mulatto’s Terrorism False Equivalence

The gay mulatto (his stature now so diminished I can’t even merit capitalizing his insulting but truthful nickname) was asked by a doting reporter to patiently explain to benighted White Americans why he refuses to say the phrase “islamic terrorism”. He replied, paraphrasing, “We shouldn’t indict all the members of a religion. I’m a Christian…”

— yes he really said that–

“…and I think Christians wouldn’t like it if every time there was a terror attack by a Christian I got up here and blamed Christian terrorism.”

There is no end to the ways that this filthy disingenuous lying scumbag faggot mulatto — this spiteful white-hating muslimist creature — besmirches the highest office in the land by his occupancy. The wrongness of his statement is glaringly evident. First, there’s the intrinsic innumeracy of lawyerly shitlibs like obama whose snark-addled brains are incapable of understanding, or unwilling to acknowledge, socially relevant mathematical concepts like population ratios.

FACT: As a share of the US population, and for that matter of the world population, the number of terror attacks committed by muslims FAR EXCEEDS terror attacks committed by members of another faith.

Second, there’s the stated or implied motivation of the terrorists. In nearly EVERY muslim terror attack, the attackers themselves, or their surrogates in goat-fucking country, claimed Allah and Islam as their inspiration.

FACT: In close to NONE of the non-muslim terror attacks, the few that there were, in the US and Europe over the last century have the attackers claimed to be Christian warriors smiting the infidels for God and Jesus. Even abortion clinic bombers (whose victim count is paltry next to muslim terrorism) who claimed to be guided by God targeted the source of their grievance instead of random innocents going about their days.

Third, terrorist attacks are only the tip of the vice-berg when the motivation is islam. For every terrorist there are ten family members who privately aided him, supported him, or ignored his activities.

FACT: There is a huge number of muslims throughout the US and Europe who approve of the institution of sharia law and privately support terrorist motives. This “complicit majority” is nowhere found among Christians, who immediately and unwaveringly align in unison against any one of their own who commits an attack in the name of Christianity.

So we’ve got to listen to the gay mulatto lie through his teeth about why he won’t use the phrase “islamic terrorism” when the truth is that he has an emotional affinity for islam and a lifelong resentment of White Christian culture, and these feelings of his motivate him to falsely conflate all-too-common murderous known wolf muslims perpetrating their evil in the name of allah with rare lone wolf White attackers who happen to be Christian.

When the gay mulatto is out of office it will be every shiv-right knight’s duty to drag his reputation through the mud until the day when his name becomes a bad word White parents caution their children against saying out loud.

Read Full Post »

We Have Met The Fascist, And He Is The Gay Mulatto

What the shitlibs bleating about “fascist Trump” don’t understand (or don’t care to understand) is that our president, Gay Mulatto, fits the criteria of a fascist dictator using the government as a tool to exact petty revenge on his political enemies.

Peter Thiel crossed Gay Mulatto and Gawker, (in my book Thiel’s role in destroying Gawker elevates him to a genuine American hero), and now it’s payback time. Recall this is the same spiteful, “peevish princeling” [ed: credit PA]  Gay Mulatto who sicced the IRS on conservative political groups. And who ordered Eric Holder to make an example of an innocent White cop in Ferguson.

Gawker and the rest of the shitlib media whore websites are octopus arms of the Democrats and their Muslimist leader, tasked with properly indoctrinating Americans to accept without question the inevitability of the White-hating Diversitopia. When Thiel cut an anti-White propaganda arm off, and supported the man (Trump) best positioned to forever tarnish the Gay Mulatto’s legacy, his transgression was too great an affront against the leftoid hate machine. Thiel must suffer. Here’s hoping he has the fight in him to take on the beast so directly.

Gay Mulatto is a petty tyrant, the exact sort of petty tyrant liberals bemoan Trump will be once in office. And thecunt’s pettiness, should she achieve power, will make his seem tame by comparison.

It’s shitlib psychological projection all the way down. If you wonder whether we’ve yet hit bottom, there’s always a deeper pit to excavate as long as the sworn enemies of White civilization remain free to scheme and indulge their hatreds.

Read Full Post »

Shitlord Of The Week: Steve Clevenger

A Seattle Mariners catcher, Steve Clevenger, was suspended without pay for the remainder of the season because he let loose with some stone cold realtalk about the Charlotte BLM riots on the Twatter.

Clevenger spoke more truth in these two tweets than the entire hivemind media apparatus, as anti-White Narrative traffickers, have rammed down our throats in weeks. Decades, even.

Weev says it best.

Two days ago Steve Clevenger, a catcher for the Seattle Mariners, made a couple tweets that any decent red blooded American could not possibly bat an eye at.

This is not controversial stuff. Black Lives Matter is a criminal terrorist organization that murders police officers, burns American cities to the ground, commits looting on an unfathomable scale, and hunts white people in the street to subject them to physical violence. Deriding and mocking these google terrorists is behavior fitting of a role model for children. This guy should be held up singly as an example of integrity in a sport infested with scum and villainy. […]

Instead of praising this man’s intellectual honesty and bravery, [the Mariners] have stolen a five figure sum of joy from his wife and children. They have taken food off of a good white man’s table.

This hits close to home for me. Tons of amazing people in the tech field were driven out of their jobs because of these fucking commie liberal faggot skypes that seem to think that no white man anywhere should ever be able to speak his mind.

Weev provides email accounts for the Mariners team and executives to whom you should direct your patient but righteously furious rage to reinstate Clevenger, genuine American hero in these dark times. You should also send Steve Clevenger some supportive words to his Twatter account: @Clev_45.

Bob Aylward <baylward@seattlemariners.com>
Joe Chard <jchard@mariners.com>
Teresa Dugger <tdugger@mariners.com>
Tim Kornegay <tkornegay@seattlemariners.com>
David Curry <dcurry@mariners.org>

***

Shitlord of the Week runner-up is NC representative Robert Pittenger, who states as succinctly as I’ve heard from anyone the truth about Google Lives Matter.

What we are finally witnessing is the anti-White dam about to burst. A ruling elite can only suppress the truth for so long… can only humiliate a nation’s people with the most transparent lies for so long…before the truth finds fissures to escape and the people rise up to ride the soul-nourishing deluge of realtalk, feeling something they hadn’t felt in a while: pride.

It’s happening lightning-quick: Whites are coalescing into a formidable force against the Confederacy of Deceivers, and if the anti-Whites know what’s good for them they’ll step back from the brink now….or step off it later.

Not unrelated, a great post from Those Who Can See offering a historical perspective of realtalkers past who were uncontroversial in their day discussing matter-of-fact truths about googles, skypes, etc, but today would run afoul of the Diversity Inc schlock troops. A reminder that as we rush to excise our great White ancestors from our public squares and honorariums and besmirch them in our textbooks and at our family tables, a lethal reaction builds that will catapult their rebellious heirs to a revolution bursting forth a reinvigorated America….or a broken America dissolved by the necessity of reconciling hatreds and antagonisms of the inevitably warring tribes.

Read Full Post »

The Google-White Homicide Ratio Is Even Worse Than Official Statistics Show

Confirming what I’ve long suspected, commenter BostonTea at Steve Sailer’s blog cites a paper concluding that the google violent crime rate is higher — in fact much higher — than the already disproportionately high rate shown in official FBI crime stats, because hispanics are almost entirely classified as “White” in federal statistics.

Steve, did you read this paper – Steffensmeier et al, “Reassessing Trends in Black Violent Crime, 1980-2008″?

We know that black males and females whose race was identified are responsible for over 50% of nation’s homicides. But there’s a huge problem with official assessments and conclusions about trends in violence based on national statistics published annually in the FBI’s UCR.

In federal statistics an overwhelming majority of the U.S. Hispanic population is classified as White (93%), whereas 4% of Hispanics are considered Black. Also crime-reporting programs typically record Hispanic arrests as White arrestees, failing to separate ethnicity from race – in particular, failing to separate Hispanics from non-Hispanic Whites. This does not only limit understanding of ethnic involvement but also hides the true disparity between White-Black crime rates (when ethnicity is NOT considered the disparity between the two races is less extreme) and tends to inflate White rates and deflate Black rates. It is called the “Hispanic effect”.

After creating estimates of “clean” White and “clean” Black arrest counts that do not include Hispanics, Steffensmeier et al. discovered that the Black share of violent crime was enlarged from 51% to 64% for homicide category and from 59% to 70% for robbery. As far as ratios are concerned, the average Black–White ratio for homicide was 7:1 using official FBI’s figures and jumped to almost 12:1 after adjusting (after separating Hispanics from non-Hispanic Whites). Same for robbery: ratio jumped from 10:1 to 15:1.

64%!

In essence, classifying Hispanic arrestees with Whites (or Blacks) deflates the Black fraction of arrests and deflates the Black–White arrest rate ratio, particularly for the more reliably reported offenses of homicide and robbery.

And likewise classifying hispanic arrestees as White (or google) deflates the hispanic crime rate. Someone should inform Ron Unz of this paper.

There’s a good reason why shitlibs cling to the cognitive emollient of rank hypocrisy. As urban dwellers they know the truth about google propensity to violence, and would prefer the expediency of hypocrisy (i.e., the disconnect between their stated beliefs and their real world actions) to the torturous ordeal of exposing their hysterically fragile egos to honest self-reflection that could potentially give succor — and a mischievous Pepe-ian smirk — to their eternal enemies, the deplorable BadWhites/Goyim.

Read Full Post »

Has Median Household Income Really Gone Up? (Answer: Not Likely)

A week ago, the liberal media outlets (but I repeat myself) crowed about a Census Bureau report claiming that the 2014-2015 percentage increase in median household income was the largest since 1998.

A commenter at the Census Bureau blog, Dr. Noman, throttles the claim,

“I would also appreciate any comments from the Census Bureau that elucidate the “one-off” uniqueness of this rate?”

Don’t expect one. The Census Bureau has pulled a fast one here just before the election. A lot of the increase is due to the redesigned questioning for median income and they know it. Google search ‘2013 redesign census’ and follow the PDF links especially.

Or look at a previous blog post here:
http://blogs.census.gov/2015/09/15/comparison-guidance-income-and-poverty/

Their own studies show that the redesigned questions inflate median income figures, and they’ve mentioned in the fine print several places that comparisons for median income for now prior to 2013 should be made with caution, but they didn’t mention it when pitching these numbers to the press, and they didn’t exercise that caution on their own.

That’s why the note about the recent increase not being significantly different than 1997-1998 is there. It’s cover.

So the Census Bureau has proved itself another corrupted wing of the Equalist Leftoid State, pulling a globalism-monger shenanigan intended to hurt Trump and nationalist spirit and aid the legacy of the Gay Mulatto and thecunt’s election chances. The anti-Whiters want so badly to say, “See? Diversity really IS our strength! Median household income is up as Whites are down!” And the Narrative-ensconced Census Bureau has stepped in to help them assert their lie with a patina of plausibility.

Welcome to low-trust America. We hope you enjoy your stay in a nation run by people who actively lie to you, day in and day out, because they hate your guts and dream of ushering a nightmarish deracinated America subsumed in total to the mystery meat market of the world.

Read Full Post »