Telegony Is Real (& etc)

That’s Madonna’s grown-up daughter, Lourdes. Who’s her daddy? No one knows.

Check out the linebacker shoulders, wormwaist, and boyhips. And that angular horse face. Poor girl must’ve stewed in a very high T neonatal environment. Sad!

She adds weight to my personal theory that tankgrrl, go-getter accomplished women have the hormonal profiles of men, and pass that on to their kids.

Or, as a reader says, it could be telegony.

noun, a former belief that a sire can influence the characteristics of the progeny of the female parent and subsequent mates.

In other words, poz loads from former lovers linger in the genetic code of children born to a current lover. It’s funny how, like physiognomy, many of these “former” beliefs are eventually (re)confirmed by ¡SCIENCE!, so we’ll see if telegony ends up getting re-validated.

If Telegony Is Real, then you REALLY don’t want to hitch your lineage wagon to a slut; the kids might end up with odd body shapes and unsettlingly creepy faces that flicker with the ghostly visages of jerkboy lovers past.

Madonna, of course, was a notorious cock hopper, so Lourdes likely has the telegonic load of a thousand different sperm sources.

PS LIE: Trump dawdled, Puerto Ricans died
TRUTH: Puerto Rico is a corrupt and incompetent black-brown state that failed its own people.

PPS Newspeak has become Tweetspeak:

I’ll do Brit one better: “Foreign invaders”.

PPPS The Catholic Church doesn’t have a priest problem, it has a homosexual problem.

[Catholic priest] homosexuals [are] overrepresented among the [sex abuse] perpetrators by a rate of 39,000% relative to the broader adult population!

We need a Two Panic Buttons meme where a sweating shitlib has to choose between destroying the Catholic Church and covering up homosexual predation.

PPPPS One of the first female infantry Marines was kicked out for fucking a subordinate. Women in combat military units undermining troop morale and cohesion? Who’da thunk it! (no one but outposts like this blog, apparently)

PPPPPS Any shitlord left on twatter should just keep taunting jack dorsey with updates on his company’s collapsing share price.

PPPPPPS We are subjected to a Mass Gaslighting Campaign by the Deep State-Deep Media Axis of Weasel:

PPPPPPPS “[When speech is shut down] then men know for certain that the time for debate is done.”

PPPPPPPPS Definition of irrelevant: national review cucks arguing that the 1st amendment doesn’t apply to monopolistic tech companies that control the information gateways.

Kevin, you aren’t principled. You’re cowardly. Learn the difference, because it explains everything about you.

PPPPPPPPPS Pop quiz:

banning an increasing number of dissident thinkers from the internet will

a. make them angrier

b. calm them down?

PPPPPPPPPPS If we weren’t neck deep in negrolatry, i’d probably cut back on the dindudeath shivs, but since we are, balance has to be brought back to the force. So you can thank a virtue sniveling anti-white shitlib for the increase in hate. Heh.

PPPPPPPPPPPS How’s the Seth Rich murder investigation going?

And anyone know why the FBI closed down an AZ observatory?

PMS The Dalai Lama says, “Europe belongs to the Europeans”, and that refugees “must return to their homelands and rebuild them”. Questions: When did the Dalai Lama become a spokesman for the Maul-Right, and how quickly will shitlibs disavow their previous love for this man of peace?

Read Full Post »

Google Hates You

Goolag is living down to its nickname. Everyone in charge of anything at Google hates you and hates Heritage America. They really do. You’re not imagining their contempt for you and your kind.

Anyone who’s half-aware of the baleful influence of Big Tech doesn’t need videotaped proof of Google’s malevolence, but here it is anyhow: an internal Google video taken right after the November 2016 election which ushered in divine retribution has been leaked to the public (and to *crickets* from the Chaimstream Media). Via:

It’s an astounding display of hubris, and it confirms everyone’s most cynical suspicions about Globohomo.

Breitbart did an excellent job of time-stamping the video and providing a synopsis, but it’s worth your time to watch the whole thing. Really drink it in. Topics discussed include: the creeping fascism of middle America, deploying AI and machine learning for political ends, corporate sedition of the incoming administration, white privilege, and how retarded proles were motivated to vote by “boredom” (excellent theory, Sergey, you’re a real clever mensch).

The hour-long video will be useful during the inevitable tribunals. For a sane and healthy society to return these people must be completely crushed. Their trusts must be ground into a million tiny pieces. And they should be made to answer for their crimes against the American people.

Goolag might have also broken the law by secretly working to help thecunt win the election. /ourTuck/ is on it:

ps duckduckgo. protonmail. firefox brave. stay away from anything google-related. Why would you support scumbags who want to drown you in spiteful H1Bs and dreary peasant labor and immiserate your posterity?

pps antitrust, ag sessions. Stop sitting on your southern gentleman hands.

Read Full Post »

The Diversity Propaganda Riddle

If Diversity™ was a strength, it wouldn’t need to be propagandized. Its goodness would be self-evident.

The purpose of propaganda is to get us to believe lies that are exposed by contact with reality.

(propaganda based on truth is called hate speech)

***

ps from a selection of readers:

Propaganda is government sponsored advertising. When was the last time something from an ad was exactly how they portrayed it?

***

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Diversity is strength.

***

It’s a wrong to believe people won’t believe anything which is obviously false. People believe things that are obviously false all the time. Instead of looking down on the use of propaganda, we need more of our own propaganda because you will never convince the average person with reason nor can you expect the average person to always accept the obvious.

***

(((They))) are trying to force a meme by repetition. But a meme doesn’t spread organically unless it has an element of truth which resonates with people.

Diversity is the strife of life.

The Diversity agitprop is definitely a top-down phenomenon, which means its power is a mile wide and an inch deep. It won’t take much counter-propaganda to strip it of its artificial allure.

Read Full Post »

There Are No Vintage Fatties

A fatty blubbers — what else is new? — that she can’t find any vintage clothes in her zaftig size. (Early-mid 20th Century textile manufacturers hadn’t yet perfected the process of stitching tarps into dresses)

Why It’s So Hard to Find Plus-Size Vintage

Being over a size 12 isn’t new, so why is finding plus-size clothing from the past so impossible?

That’s where our special feeds fatty is wrong. As a demographically significant percentage of the total population (and of the share of customers for the vintage clothing market), being over size 12 *is* historically new. The obesity rate of early 20th Century children was near zero; likely the adult obesity rate wasn’t much higher. Obesity and overweight rates didn’t explode (heh) until 1980.

A size 12 dress on an average-height American woman roughly corresponds to a BMI of 27 — which is overweight according to CDC charts. Note that dress sizes have been inflated (heh) to accommodate the bulbously shielded yet still fragile egos of the rolling tide of fatties shambling into clothing stores and mashing keyboards at online retailers.

So to answer the question sloshing around our fatty’s gullet, she can’t find size 12+ vintage clothes because there weren’t very many vintage fat chicks. Take the Shed Pill, fatty!

Read Full Post »

What’s The Matter With White People?

A reader asks,

Oh wise CH, what the hell is the matter with Europeans, what makes them so deeply cucked? More specificity, why do the Brits, Germans and Swedes all choose female heads of their states hell-bent on leading them to their destruction?  There must be something subtle here I’m missing.

By a quirk of evolution. NW Euros (and perhaps only NW Euros, extending to their diaspora cousins) acquired an exquisitely fine-tuned feeling of empathy that toxically commingles with their compulsion to psychologically project their hyper-domesticated moral sense onto others, which in a Diversitopian nightmare means emotionally identifying with people who are nothing like them and who laugh at their naiveté.

Complementary hypothesis: Prosperity has made White shitlibs decadently soft and mushy-headed, and they have become unable to see the day coming when they won’t have the luxury of virtue signaling for cheap social status anymore.

Same reader,

But they weren’t like this prior to end of WW2, no female heads of state and very few cucked male heads of state. What changed after WW2?

Lag time effect. The self-destructive seed was already embedded in NW Euros, it just needed time to germinate, grow, and yield fruity poz. Oh, and YKW were highly concentrated fertilizer.

Read Full Post »

¡SCIENCE!: Sluts Really Are Asking For It

The Chateau is no longer an outpost in a dark world. The dark world is an outpost of the Chateau.

File under: Ladies, if you act like a slut, you’ll be treated like a slut.

Subcategory: Liberal women, rape fantasies, and the PoundMeToo SMV signaling hysteria: A Theory of Femme.

Via Steverino:

Why Are Liberal Women More Likely to Report They’ve Been Sexually Harassed?

On Twitter, a guy calling himself Zach Goldberg does these amazing long tweet data dive explorations of hot topics. For example, he has a new one inquiring into why liberal women are more likely to report being sexually harassed than conservative women.

I don’t think he has yet ruled out all other reasonable explanations. For example:

– Liberal women turned liberal because they were sexually harassed. […]

But Goldberg has come up with a barnburner of a correlation I’d never heard of before, which you can read here.

Reposting the Twatter thread here:

Since then, I've gathered enough data to generate a longitudinal trend line to determine a) whether the high % of women reporting sexual harassment is historically unprecedented; and b) whether liberal women are consistently more likely to report experiences of sexual harassment

— Zach Goldberg (@ZachG932) August 31, 2018

The whole thread is worth reading (I’m sure AE would be interested in this treasure trove of sexual market data, given that it was largely pulled from the GSS).

Lascivious Summary: Liberal women are more likely than conservative women to report being sexually harassed, because liberal women are more likely than conservative women to have erotic rape fantasies (i.e., women tingle when they think about being forced to have nonconsensual sex).

Most women have “forcible sex” erotic fantasies, but overeducated liberal women really run with it. And remember, fantasies are based on real desire. If they weren’t, by the property of randomness we would hear of women having sex fantasies about beta males. They don’t.

Other findings: Alcohol and working in an office where one is alone with a lot of relatively alpha male bosses are somewhat predictive of the likelihood of reporting being the “victim” (sneer quotes now backed by hard data) of sexual harassment.

But…

number of sex partners + rape appeal appear to be doing most of the heavy lifting. Unfortunately, this data set did not include a measure of ideology; but the effects of Party ID point in the ‘Democratic’ direction.

I’m working up to something, bear with me.

Another finding: The data don’t necessarily show an increase in workplace sexual harassment in the PoundMeToo era (roughly the past two years); what it shows is an increase in *reports* of sexual harassment. Media saturation coverage of isolated sexual harassment stories grabs women’s attention and motivates them to jump on the sexual harassment victim bandwagon.

That said, considering some of the other media effects I’ve previously shared in the context of perceived discrimination, I do think it’s at least plausible that the salience of the issue in the media–and the concomitant prestige/sympathy that awaits those who claim victimhood–produces these sudden upward swings in the reporting base rate.

In other words, the ‘real’ base rate–i.e. what the average person (i.e. not gender studies majors) would consider sexual harassment–has remained relatively stable overtime, but that media salience + the broadening of the definition (to include even innocuous or unintended behavior) encourages a kind of ‘identity-expressive’/socially motivated reporting.

Propaganda works (especially if the recipients of it are psychologically predisposed to accept the premises of the propaganda because parroting it would increase their social and/or sexual status). In sum, the Chaimstream Media has weaponized the minds, bodies, and souls of our White women.

So here we go with my Theory of Femme. Women are natural attention whores, and shitlib women are the biggest attention whores. As a woman becomes more conservative, she is less interested in attention whoring.

Media propaganda feeds into women’s natural conformism; their need to be socially accepted by the dominant in-group. For shitlib women, this means conforming to shitlib fads, like PoundMeToo. Combine women’s conformism with their attention whoring and media coverage, and you get sexual harassment moral panics.

Furthermore, the attention whoring is really a sexual market value display. Women who claim to be sexually harassed by men are implying that they are so desirable men can’t control themselves in their company. Shitlib women who dream of being erotically raped would, naturally, boost their SMV signal by casting themselves as victims of rape-y men. SMV signaling is reward enough, but shitlib women also get a…tingle…in their nethers when they imagine themselves in the role of the overcome woman who had no choice but to give in to the brutish alpha male.

Here’s the catch: most shitlib women work in fields where they are surrounded by flappy-wristed soyboys and supplicating male feminists. These are not the men erotic rape fantasies are made of. The PoundMeToo cyclical sexual panic can best be seen, then, as a sexual wish fulfillment hysteria coupled with a disgust for the weak males who by convenient proximity would be unwittingly enlisted to play the role of the irresistible, dominating, self-entitled alpha male. Women hate that these soft males are their “fantasy fuel”, so when one of these soys makes an innocuous gesture that can be misinterpreted by a battlecunt with a chip on her shoulder as sexual harassment, they get taken to the she-shed for the requisite social shaming and livelihood destruction.

And now we know why single White women with college degrees — nearly all of them shitlib — signal so hard for open borders to the Brute World. Maybe they aren’t signaling. Maybe…juuuuust maybe….these shitlib chicks want more aggressive men to fill in for the role of the rapist hunk of their deepest starkest sexual fantasies.

That is my Theory of Femme. Someone notify Jordan Peterson and see what he thinks.

In other common sense news, it takes two to tango. If a girl dresses slutty and acts slutty, men will (often enough rightly) assume she is DTF. The failure to communicate only occurs when the slut gets the expected solicirations from betas she’d rather not entertain. This mismatch between endeavor and reward brews toxic spite in sluts, who take it out on all men, making themselves less commitment-worthy with each year closer they careen to cat ladydom.

Read Full Post »

The Masculinizing Effects Of The Birth Control Pill

CH is on record noting the disturbing trend toward physical and behavioral masculinization of American women. Maybe the Pill is the primary culprit? From the BBC (Big Blubbering Cucks):

With an affordable source of progesterone found [Mexican yams], researchers turned to its uses as a contraceptive. The birth control pill hit the market less than a decade later. Marker, on the other hand, mysteriously disappeared from public life and became obsessed with collecting silver.

Maybe he couldn’t handle the knowledge that he had unleashed one of the Six Sirens of the Sexual Apocalypse?

The economic and social side effects of the pill were as profound as they are well-documented. Sex could be enjoyed without fear of pregnancy. Suddenly women could devote their 20s and 30s to furthering their education and careers, rather than housework and nappies.

Shareholders rejoiced.

But right from the beginning, the pill has had a secret.

In recent years, scientists have started to realise that the brains of women on the pill look fundamentally different. Compared to women who aren’t taking hormones, some regions of their brains seem to be more typically ‘male’.

Whoo boy, buckle up, this ride’s gonna unsettle more than a few feminist snowflakes.

There are behavioural changes, too. Women on certain types of pill aren’t as good at coming up with words – something our gender are usually highly skilled at. On the other hand, they’re better at mentally rotating objects, as is often the case in men. […]

Every brand of combined pill on the market contains the same type of synthetic oestrogen, ethinyl estradiol, and one of eight synthetic progesterones, called progestins. Ethinyl estradiol prevents the body from releasing an egg every month, while progestins thicken the mucus at the entrance to the cervix and conspire to make the womb inhospitable. Even if an egg slips out and becomes fertilised, it won’t be able to settle down and start growing.

So far, so good. But though the hormones are effective at preventing pregnancy, they aren’t perfect matches for our natural hormones. The end result is that these synthetic versions also have effects that you would never get from raw progesterone. […]

The women were sweatier, hairier and spottier. Some noticed that their voices had deepened. Nearly one in five baby girlsborn to mothers taking it had masculinised genitals. Some of these unlucky children required surgery.

Is the Pill the genesis of Clown World trannyism?

Generally speaking, the older, cheaper brands of pill tend to contain androgenic hormones, while newer, more expensive ones tend to contain anti-androgens. This may be one reason that just 17% of women on the combined pill in the US take the anti-androgenic versions.

Is there a class distinction developing between feminine and masculine women?

The scans revealed that several brain areas were larger in the women on the pill, compared to those of women who weren’t. These areas just so happened to be larger in men than women, too.

But gender is a social construction blah blah Hi, My Name Is Feminist!

The study involved a relatively small sample and didn’t separate androgenic and anti-androgenic contraception, so Pletzer cautions against reading too much into the results. But other research has hinted that both types of hormones actually may be changing our behaviour.

Modren society is a crash course in how many endocrine disruptors can be squeezed into the environment (and up SJW buttholes).

Other studies have found that women on oral contraception remember emotional stories more like men – recalling the gist more than the details.

Lol “you never listen” (said by soyhubby to manjawwife)

They’re also not as good at recognising emotions in others, such as anger, sadness, or disgust – just like men. It looks suspiciously like certain types of pill are “masculinising” women’s brains.

Perhaps the most striking evidence, however, comes from a paper published in 2015. This time, Pletzer compared the brains of women on the two types of pill with women who were not. Several brain areas were larger in the women whose pills contained the newer, anti-androgenic progestins.

Crucially, these changes seemed to be affecting their behaviour.

Two brain areas were particularly engorged: the fusiform face area, a region about the size of a pea that processes facial information (from photographs of friends to cartoons), and the parahippocampal place area, which important for recognising places (such as cityscapes). These women were also better at recognising faces.

Hey, let’s mess with the primal forces of human reproduction. What could go wrong?

To complicate matters further, all combined pills contain synthetic oestrogen, which is feminising. This means that the same women may be experiencing both ‘feminising’ and ‘masculinising’ effects on their brains at the same time.

jfc worst of both worlds. You get a passive-aggressive battlecunt. “honey, did you remember our second date anniversary? No? GET THE FUCK OUT NOW BEFORE I DROP A #METOO ON YOUR SORRY BETA ASS”

No one could have predicted that an ugly yam would give rise to a feminist revolution.

Mexico hasn’t been sending its best for a long time.

The pill has repeatedly been called the greatest invention of the 20th Century and is said to be responsible for a third of the increase in women’s wages since the 1960s.

Coincidentally, it’s also been responsible for a third of the decrease in women’s lifetime fertility and lovability.

But contraceptive pills may have a darker side. As Pletzer wrote in 2014, when athletes take steroids we call it ‘doping’ – it’s considered abuse and strongly condemned by society. But we’re happy for millions of women to take these hormones every day, sometimes right through from puberty to menopause.

When you fuck with the laws of Nature, don’t be surprised when Nature fucks you back. The God of Biomechanics will not be denied for long.

Read Full Post »