CH Maxim #16: A Woman Never Falls Out Of Love With A Selfish Jerk

This post will have many detractors, but if they would stop and think about what they have actually observed happening when women and their beloved jerkboys break up, they will see the wisdom in CH Maxim #16: A woman never falls out of love with a selfish jerk.

This does not mean a woman never ends a relationship with a selfish jerk. It means that, even when the woman initiates the break-up (usually from desperate frustration at her failed attempts to extract a tiny concession toward domestication from her jerkboy), she will continue feeling strong love for the incorrigible jerk who makes her swoon.

A woman’s love, once ignited, is hard to extinguish. But there are ways in which women genuinely fall out of love. Being a jerk is not one of them.

Here is a list of the most common scenarios that can cause a woman’s love for a man to wither and die.

• the formerly lovable jerkboy turns beta while lounging in the comfort bubble of a long-term relationship or marriage.

This is the biggest reason why women fall out of love. The charming jerkboys they once knew transformed into boring beta males suckling at their teats for emotional nourishment. Marriage/LTRs are not only fattening agents, they also acts as hardening agents on women’s hearts, and as solvents on men’s scrotums.

• she found a higher status man.

Female hypergamy is a bitch. Darkly, women can fall out of love if they meet a man superior in many ways to their current lovers. It’s not nearly as common as scenario #1 above, because love tends to dampen women’s hypergamous instinct.

• she lost weight and suddenly found herself the center of male attention.

Women can fall in love with lower SMV men if their self-perception is that they are themselves low SMV. But woe to the beta male who marries a fatty who later slims down (it’s been known to happen). She will “feel her oats” and her love will migrate from her loser man who settled for her to better men with options who actively CHOOSE her newly slender sexiness.

The above are the big three explanations for how women fall out of love.

What you will never see: A woman falling out of love with her man because he was too much of a charming, narcissistic, selfish jerkboy to her.

She may very well end her RELATIONSHIP with the jerk, but that’s not the same as ending her LOVE for him. In fact, you will often hear freshly single women lament their lingering love for the jerkboys they had to let go to spare their sanity (or to find a man willing to give them marriage and children). You know, you’ll hear stuff like,

“I still love him, but it wasn’t going anywhere.”

“I’ll never stop loving him, but I had to do what was right for me.”

“GOD, you make this so difficult!”

“I’ll never stop having feelings for you.”

“Is this what you wanted? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED?!”

“We’re done. I can’t take it anymore. You had my love, everything. Why did you throw it away?”

When a woman ends a relationship with a jerkboy, she leaves with love still fluttering in her heart. A deluge of her tears will accompany the jerk’s exit from her life. (For his part, he will leave sad, but not cripplingly sad, and not at all worried about finding another girl, and this will naturally drive the woman crazy and deeper in love.) Her words will ring with tragic exasperation, and sorrow for what she feels unwilling to do. It will take months, sometimes years, sometimes longer than that, for her to fully get over the jerk, and achieve some inner peace when she can once again give her body and heart freely to another man without the stigmata of the jerk’s love marking her out as the ex-maiden of a demon’s unearthly magnetism.

Now, compare and contrast to a woman leaving a beta male:

No love in her heart. (only pity, sometimes contempt)
Impeccably trouble-free transition out of the relationship.
No guilt, pained regret, or second thoughts.
No mention of the word “love”.
Cold as ice execution of the break-up.
Outward-focused blame, rather than inward-focused. (she blames herself for the jerk’s inability to commit to her satisfaction. she blames the beta for her loss of desire for him)
Little need to lean on female friends or beta orbiters for emotional support during the post-break-up adjustment period and follow-up rebound dating.

Women leave selfish jerks all the time. But women never really fall out of love with selfish jerks. They carry that jerkboy torch all their lives, a warm nostalgia preserving forever a faint echo of loyalty to the jerkboy and simultaneously an inconvenient barrier to any future betas who might foolishly try to win the full scope of her heart for themselves.

PS There’s a major sex difference on the theme of this post. A man will never leave a sexy woman with heaviness in his heart because she won’t commit to an LTR or otherwise follow his script for their future together. A man in such a situation will privately nurse his disappointment but never think about giving up such a fine piece of ass on the regular. If he does finally give up on her on his own terms, it will be because some other equally cute and marginally less crazy girl started showing interest in him. Men DO fall out of love, though. It happens all the time when women get older and/or fatter.

Read Full Post »

You’re A “Dumb Fuck” If You’re On Social Media Without Anonymizing Protection

Our favorite Olizarch, Mark Fuckersperg, the Visitor who has let the mask slip to reveal the nation-hating reptile underneath, is once again exposed as the alien he is to his host society. Fuckersperg IMs from his Harvard days were made public (by “sources”, aka people who personally know the autistic prick), and we (re)learn that Fuckersperg has never had much use for protecting the privacy of his Facebook users.

Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don’t know why.

Zuck: They “trust me”

Zuck: Dumb fucks.

Spoken like a true sociopath. And this is the reptile our nation’s leaders turn to for advice on how best to shove open borders and an endless wage-gutting, White culture-napalming shitstream of H-1Bs/HB1s down middle America’s throat.

Fuckersperg is right. You are a gullible chump, a dumb fuck, if you willingly hand over your personal life history to mini-tyrants like him. If you must surrender your autonomy to social media, make liberal use of anonymizing concealment. At the very least, deny these rootless vermin their targeted marketing profits.

PS How to permanently delete your Facebook account.

PPS Facebook isn’t a total cesspit. Before you leave it behind for good, check out the “No Hymen No Diamond” community. It’s funny ’cause it’s true.

PPPS Disengaging from Facebook is a specific instance of a wider disengagement from America, which every truth-loving dissident should be doing now. Disengage from your country which has abandoned you, except to do those things that are necessary to maintain poolside time and then only with the barest minimum of interaction required by the system. I suggest everyone do this, because America is lost and she ain’t ever gonna be found again. Not in the incarnation of her glorious past. Say your final goodbyes to America as she was, and NEXT her. You’ll discover that this break-up is very liberating. You’ll have the freedom to game a new America who truly loves you and pledges her loyalty to you.

PA offers his version of an “Oath of Disengagement”:

I withdraw allegiance from the death cult of the United States of degeneracy and from the oligarchy it has become, wrecked nation, odious to God, with tyranny and burdens for Whites.

👍

Reader Ton adds his version of the Preamble to the US Deconstitution:

We the cuckholds of the United States, in Order to form a morally perfect Union, establish social Justice, insure domestic Tyrany, provide for the common slob, promote the general Welfare addict and secure the holdings of goldman to themselves whilst ramming our posterity, do ordain and establish this Cuckstatution for the United States of Amerdica.

With liberty and trannys for all! Ahh men! Hot ones hopefully.

😆

Read Full Post »

High Sexual Market Value Chicks Dig Mass Murderers

Any beta males reading this post ought to grab a Kleenex, because there is no God and your romantic ideals are laughable.

James Holmes, the creepy-looking mass murderer who killed 12 and injured 70 in an Aurora, CO movie theater three years ago, has a veritable harem of gushing (heh) distaff admirers on his cell wall.

According to reporters, Holmes has a full dance card should he have requests for conjugal visits approved.

A photograph of James Holmes’ prison cell. The pictures were sent to Holmes by various women correspondents following the shooting in which he killed 12 people.

I see a lot of bangable babes in that clink collage.

Many supposed “red pillers” and even some field-tested PUAs refuse to believe that chicks dig the worst sorts of jerks. But the evidence that they do is everywhere. Not all chicks dig mass murderers (NACDMM), of course, but many more are aroused by killers than would be presumed if the addiction was a rare, exotic psychological disorder. And that quite often these death row groupies are attractive, psychologically normal women who simply reside on the far right of an asshole-loving bell curve. You know, the kinds of good-looking thin women most law-abiding beta males would wife up in an instant and ask questions later.

Our society condemns all sorts of male weirdos for their sexual predilections, why can’t we equally condemn these female killer groupies for their sexual predilection? Or is it only men’s sexual preferences that qualify for opprobrium by the feminist industrial simplex? Rhetorical.

PS You don’t have to be a mass murderer to win the love of cute girls, but the sexual attention that killers like the not-handsome Holmes receive from scores of women should clue you in that integrating a little of that jerkboy charisma into your personality will richly reward you in the dating market.

Read Full Post »

Ruling Leftoids Increase Their Chokehold On Unauthorized Speech

Sometimes the conspiracy theorists are right.

Mark Fuckersperg — the Facebook CEO who is so beta he cashed in his billions for a fat waifu — was caught on a hot mic promising Angela “Swarthenfreude” Merkel he would do what he could to censor comments on his one billion customer base social media platform that were critical of open borders and the waves of refugee migrants into Europe and America.

We all knew this about Fuckersperg, that he’s an anti-White, pro-mystery meat degenerate equalist leftoid, but now he has let the mask slip completely off.

On cue, amygdala-stunted shitlibs will intone, “Facebook is a private corporation, so it’s not a violation of the First Amendment if they censor unauthorized opinions! It’s well within their right, and if you don’t like it you can just log off.”

How bizarre to listen to nuanced shitlibs so vehemently endorse the letter of the law and the virtue of tolerating ideas that offend!

Yes, it’s true that Fuckersperg can’t be marched to the gallows for censoring speech on his idiotic attention whore enabling website. But what shitlibs who defend the sanitization of Realtalk never grasp is that censorship needn’t be a government-only campaign for millions of American citizens to have their voices effectively silenced. When nearly every major information medium is owned and operated by scorched-earth leftoids (and sniveling cuckservatives) harboring intense hatred for normal, core White Americans, then in practice their coordinated (organic or conspired) attacks on unauthorized speech amount to a society-wide censoring — a disenfranchisement, if you will — of those who don’t toe the Party Line.

Leftoid: “but but durrr you can’t yell fire in a theater, shitlord!”

And that’ll be the end of sensible human communication with the leftoid, and the beginning of slapping him aside with the back of your pimp hand.

Read Full Post »

Genes Mirror Geography, Nations And Cultures

Via:

Culture does not spring up out of the ground unseeded, like a summoned monolith. Human genetic disposition seeds the ground and creates culture, unleashing a macro feedback loop where culture and genes interact in perpetuity. Those “cultural judgments” [the leftoids] recoil from are actually subconscious reinforcements of ancient biological truths.

Chateau Heartiste, October, 2011.

Equalist leftoid race creationism is bringing the death of the West. It is a sick, suicidal ideology built on a foundation of rank lies. It must be defeated, or it will consume everything good, true, and beautiful in its path.

Read Full Post »

Study: Diversity + Proximity = War (With Addendum On The Perceptive Genius Of CH)

May as well get this out of way early:

*💋PREEN💋*

An April 2015 research paper concludes that the Heartiste formulation

DIVERSITY + PROXIMITY = WAR

is a fact, is true, is empirically sound, and is an accurate description of the way the world actually works, (instead of the way various open borders ‘toids insist the world works through the haze of their equalist acid trip).

The Nature of Conflict

This research establishes that the emergence, prevalence, recurrence, and severity of intrastate conflicts in the modern era reflect the long shadow of prehistory. Exploiting variations across national populations, it demonstrates that genetic diversity, as determined predominantly during the exodus of humans from Africa tens of thousands of years ago, has contributed significantly to the frequency, incidence, and onset of both overall and ethnic civil conflict over the last half-century, accounting for a large set of geographical and institutional correlates of conflict, as well as measures of economic development. Furthermore, the analysis establishes the significant contribution of genetic diversity to the intensity of social unrest and to the incidence of intragroup factional conflict. These findings arguably reflect the contribution of genetic diversity to the degree of fractionalization and polarization across ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups in the national population; the adverse influence of genetic diversity on interpersonal trust and cooperation; the contribution of genetic diversity to divergence in preferences for public goods and redistributive policies; and the potential impact of genetic diversity on economic inequality within a society.

Diversity can be interesting… when corralled into separate countries and appreciated remotely or incidentally, such as when traveling. But Diversity™ — that is, the trademarked industrialized concept of diversity that demands it be situated in jarringly close proximity to Whites in White homelands — is a recipe for war.

War in every sense of the word:

• social unrest
• polarization
• lowered trust and cooperation
• severed bonds of shared purpose
• loss of public solidarity and ability to compromise on nation-defining principles
• a corrosion of generosity toward fellow citizens
• the rise of a host-parasite paradigm
• massive economic inequality
• stress-related illnesses from having to constantly be on guard against getting screwed
• a hundredfold increase in DMV wait times
• the normalizing of government incompetence and heavy-handedness

The list of shit consequences that flow like raw sewage from the proximate antagonisms of human genetic Diversity™ reads like a San Francisco bathhouse health code violation rap sheet. The more you scrutinize the fine print, the uglier — and bloodier — it gets.

Not that this will change any hearts and minds that most need changing. What’s a little (or a lot of) ethnic and racial civil conflict as long as Bryan Caplan gets to whore for status among his spergitarian SWPL buddies and live in a $450,000 median home price bubble?

The time for convincing shitlibs of any of these abiding truths is over. They are, at this stage of national dissolution, immune to reason and logic and simple common sense. The finer arts of persuasion have had their day. A more… direct… method of persuasion may be all that’s left to stop the suicide spiral.

Read Full Post »

Women In Love Act Like Beta Males In Lust

The behavior of a woman in love bears striking similarities to the behavior of a beta male in lust. CH previously explored this theme in lurid detail, and recently reader bw7and invigorated the theme with his personal experiences dealing with girls desperately crushing on him.

Heartiste, There have been a few girls I am fucking right now….all of them are around 2 points below my SMV. But I am getting regular action so I ain’t complaining.

One thing I noticed is that these girls will act the same way beta males act with hot girls. They try to entertain me when I am not in the mood. Like literally trying to make me laugh, entertain, put in effort which you just don’t see the hot girls doing for you or these same girls doing for other guys.

I play the aloof alpha card. suits my personality as well and I am able to pull it off pretty well.

Like this one chick, I never even showed interest in her whenever we met (thru social circle). I knew she was wildly attracted to me…she qualified…some comfort and she escalated physically all the time whenever we met. She actually made things happen like got drunk and got to my place unannounced to fuck me.

This is typically how 99.9% of false campus rape allegations go down: a mediocre girl with a major case of the tingles for a man strongly comes on to him, deliberately puts herself in a situation where sex is very likely to happen, and lubes the whole thing with alcohol because she wants the dick so bad she doesn’t want to risk her sober inhibitions making a “surprise, I might be a slut!” appearance at the moment of consummation.

The man, of course, is completely innocent, but the next day when the bitch realizes she will never be his Number One and has plugged into the feminist industrial waste complex the end of his life as he knows it will have begun.

I never made a physical move first….was just leading until the bedroom…..some kino escalation….kissing then F-close. Didn’t have to work for anything. Felt like a hot chick having to do no work to get laid. Played the aloof alpha card all the time and it worked like a charm. (never fell for her shit-test, total indifference at times even during LMR….no neediness)

I’d appreciate a more in-depth post on how women act with alpha males the same way beta guys act around hot girls.

Well, I say you’ve pretty much given all the depth the CH readership needs. A woman in the company of an irresistible, aloof, dominant, self-possessed alpha male will act not unlike a beta male in the company of a pretty girl.

The primary difference between the two is that the alpha male will bang the needy, try-hard woman as long as she’s decent-looking, while the needy, try-hard beta male is banging nothing but his head against a wall.

PS The implication of this post is that women are able to quickly and deeply fall in love with alpha males, despite their claims and romcom platitudes to the contrary asserting that love needs time to bloom. Corollary: Any beta male who tells his girlfriend that he loves her and receives from her a “it’s too soon for that, we need more time to see where this goes” response should accept it as fact that it will always be too soon and his girlfriend will never go with him where he wants her to go.

PPS Here are a few more examples of beta male-ish behavior that a woman swooning over an alpha male will display:

• ask a lot of questions about him
• laugh too hard at his lame jokes
• get too butthurt by his teasing
• agree with everything he says
• eagerly accept all of his venue bouncing suggestions
• pay for his drinks
• make no effort to qualify him
• excuse every lame, stupid, or shitty thing he says or does
• take it up the pooper at his request
• clumsily make all the first moves (with women, this means “incidental” contact with his erogenous zones)
• try too hard to fill momentary breaks in conversation with fluff
• misconstrue every minor indicator of interest as evidence of a blossoming love affair
• apologize too much

Read Full Post »