Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Vanity’ Category

May as well get this out of way early:

*💋PREEN💋*

An April 2015 research paper concludes that the Heartiste formulation

DIVERSITY + PROXIMITY = WAR

is a fact, is true, is empirically sound, and is an accurate description of the way the world actually works, (instead of the way various open borders ‘toids insist the world works through the haze of their equalist acid trip).

The Nature of Conflict

This research establishes that the emergence, prevalence, recurrence, and severity of intrastate conflicts in the modern era reflect the long shadow of prehistory. Exploiting variations across national populations, it demonstrates that genetic diversity, as determined predominantly during the exodus of humans from Africa tens of thousands of years ago, has contributed significantly to the frequency, incidence, and onset of both overall and ethnic civil conflict over the last half-century, accounting for a large set of geographical and institutional correlates of conflict, as well as measures of economic development. Furthermore, the analysis establishes the significant contribution of genetic diversity to the intensity of social unrest and to the incidence of intragroup factional conflict. These findings arguably reflect the contribution of genetic diversity to the degree of fractionalization and polarization across ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups in the national population; the adverse influence of genetic diversity on interpersonal trust and cooperation; the contribution of genetic diversity to divergence in preferences for public goods and redistributive policies; and the potential impact of genetic diversity on economic inequality within a society.

Diversity can be interesting… when corralled into separate countries and appreciated remotely or incidentally, such as when traveling. But Diversity™ — that is, the trademarked industrialized concept of diversity that demands it be situated in jarringly close proximity to Whites in White homelands — is a recipe for war.

War in every sense of the word:

  • social unrest
  • polarization
  • lowered trust and cooperation
  • severed bonds of shared purpose
  • loss of public solidarity and ability to compromise on nation-defining principles
  • a corrosion of generosity toward fellow citizens
  • the rise of a host-parasite paradigm
  • massive economic inequality
  • stress-related illnesses from having to constantly be on guard against getting screwed
  • a hundredfold increase in DMV wait times
  • the normalizing of government incompetence and heavy-handedness

The list of shit consequences that flow like raw sewage from the proximate antagonisms of human genetic Diversity™ reads like a San Francisco bathhouse health code violation rap sheet. The more you scrutinize the fine print, the uglier — and bloodier — it gets.

Not that this will change any hearts and minds that most need changing. What’s a little (or a lot of) ethnic and racial civil conflict as long as Bryan Caplan gets to whore for status among his spergitarian SWPL buddies and live in a $450,000 median home price bubble?

The time for convincing shitlibs of any of these abiding truths is over. They are, at this stage of national dissolution, immune to reason and logic and simple common sense. The finer arts of persuasion have had their day. A more… direct… method of persuasion may be all that’s left to stop the suicide spiral.

Read Full Post »

October 10, 2008, Chateau Heartiste:

VIII. Say you’re sorry only when absolutely necessary

Do not say you’re sorry for every wrong thing you do. It is a posture of submission that no man should reflexively adopt, no matter how alpha he is. Apologizing increases the demand for more apologies. She will come to expect your contrition, like a cat expects its meal at a set time each day. And then your value will lower in her eyes. Instead, if you have done something wrong, you should acknowledge your guilt in a glancing way without resorting to the actual words “I’m sorry.” Pull the Bill Clinton maneuver and say “Mistakes were made” or tell her you “feel bad” about what you did. You are granted two freebie “I’m sorry”s for the life of your relationship; use them wisely.

September 11, 2015, Donald Trump:

“I think apologizing’s a great thing,” [Trump] said. “But you have to be wrong. I will absolutely apologize, sometime in the hopefully distant future, if I’m ever wrong.”

***

Chateau Heartiste, as usual, is way ahead of the curve. Donald Trump may or may not be a CH reader, but he’s putting CH principles into action, and it’s paying huge dividends.

Read Full Post »

Permit a moment to *preen*.

– At Breitbart, Milo Yiannopoulos links to an older CH post about sexbots. (Hey, Milo, there’s been a lot of great CH stuff since then that you can leverage for 3,000+ comment gain.) The article is a good read, even if the points made are already familiar to Chateau acolytes. The huge response to it is proof that the topic hits a lot of nerves, and only a shiv tip-dipped in truth frog poison will induce that kind of excruciating nerve inflammation reaction.

– Nick Gillespie at Reason magazine (libertarioid central) swipes right on the Chateau as he accepts the truth of an important game concept: Donald Trump negs his rivals. Like many beta males who attempt to understand game without field experience, Nick doesn’t quite get the neg, but he comes closer than most awestruck outsiders. The neg isn’t “an insult, followed by a compliment”; it’s a backhanded compliment. The insult — and that’s really too strong a wrong to describe the effect, which would be better described as “a tease” — is implied in the structure of the compliment; it isn’t launched like a verbal ICBM. Also, another correction: The neg works on ALL people, but especially women, because it is human nature to seek social approval and acceptance from others we deem superior (or, in the case of women, dominant and charming) to us.

– Although it’s a stretch to call it a “mainstream” site, Free Republic grapples with the game principle of alpha male body language, and how Donald “Can’t Stump The” Trump uses it to his advantage. CH has numerous archived posts on this topic predating the current political pundit fascination with it by years.

If When Trump wins the Presidency, remember that CH endorsed his candidacy three months ago to this day, on June 17, beating Lion of the Blogosphere’s endorsement by one month. Heh.

***

While these next two tributes to CH’s insidious greatness didn’t directly link to yer ‘umble narrator, they did tacitly pay respect to the Chateau’s Stone Cold Shivthink and provide evidence that CH has widened the Overton Window so much it is prolapsed and leaking off-message memetic viruses.

– Ann Coulter has raised her Game and has earned enough financial independence to enjoy a refreshing sip of freethought independence. We here at CH believe Ann is a secret reader and our je ne sais quoi has rubbed off on her and amplified her preexisting condition to assault people with uncomfortable truths.

– No need for conjecture. Steve Sailer is definitely a CH reader (but only at night, in a gloomily underlit bedroom). He indirectly endorses the CH take on the “””refugee””” “””crisis””” as a case of the German betaboys getting cucked by their leader, the aging broad Merkel, who can’t help but feel long-dormant vagina tingles erupting for invading swarth of the earth armed with acting class, camera-ready sob stories to put over on gullible leftoid equalist Hiveminders.

***

Update: Anatoly Karlin at Unz is also a reader. The Chateau needs a guesthouse.

Read Full Post »

Donald Trump, you Magnificent Bastard. You have the tightest, Whitest Game the American people have seen since… Reagan? Teddy Roosevelt? Andrew Jackson?

Once again, Teflon Don is cornered by a snake coming at him with a shitlib sneak attack, and once again Teflon Don demonstrates his mastery of social interaction as he effortlessly swats away the reptile’s lunge and maintains frame.

The interviewer then asks specifically about David Duke supporting him, and says “would you repudiate David Duke?”

The Donald, mocking the faggot, says “sure. I would do that if it made you feel better. I don’t know anything about him.”

The Donald knows, my friends. The Donald knows all about the manosphere, the dissident Right, the teachings of the Chateau, the growing army of Whites waking up to their physical and psychological dispossession. He senses this White populist uprising, and he’s tapping into it, brilliantly.

Don, CH is here for you. Keep reading. We’ll take you to ultimate victory.

Read Full Post »

Almost immediately after @heartiste was banned from Twatter by a disGUNTled fat, bitter pigwoman on a phony charge of violating their TOS, Twatter stock nose-dived, and hasn’t recovered.

Via da GBFM lzzzzzzzlzlz (TM), the ongoing story of Twatter’s SJW-led demise.

Coincidence? I think not.

Read Full Post »

Dirty Randy wonders how to evade a typical substance-free leftoid attack.

You can see the Hivemind formulating their comeback: “They must be Stormfronters.” What’s the proper way to respond? Ignore and plow? Agree and amplify?

A number of game concepts could work here.

Agree&Amplify

“You’re gonna love my jackboots kicking you in your nutless sack.”

Ignore&Plow

“Answer the question. What do you think of the black on white rape stats? Do you deny them?”

Reframe the ad hominem

“Beats being a member of the gaypedoface club.”

Increase The Voltage

“You must be wearing a buttplug right now. Do you take it out for a breather once in a while?”

Patronize Your Enemy

“Why are you so afraid of honest discussion?”

Dismissive Mastery

“Gay”

I’m sure the more skilled game practitioners in the studio audience could come up with a few more effective counterattacks. It shouldn’t be hard. What the hell kind of semantic weaponry do shitlibs have besides squealing like stuck piglets and stamping their wee hooves with DEFCON 1 butthurt?

***

FYI, the Chateau Heartiste blog recently passed 70 million total views.

Too bad it’s not a dollar per view. :sad:

Read Full Post »

The Dissidenti™™ and their frazzled hall monitors buzzsaw with talk about “cuckservatives.” It’s the shiv du jour, you see. As shivs go, it is in this ‘umble narrator’s opinion one of the more lethal of the semantic shanks employed by dark realists.

Lovers and haters of the Cuck Shiv gird for battle (well, the haters girdle for battle). The wielders love the twist of their shiny new toy. The haters brace defensively, shielding vitals. As well they should. CH commenters wonder, not without historical wonderment precedent for questions of Realtalk™ provenance aligned with Chateau themes, was it Heartiste who coined the “cuckservative” scarlet C? Answer: I don’t know. The first mention of it here is dated 24 Jun 2015. I suspect Poasting Whytes were first in the field with their version. Perhaps the term was independently formulated by multiple parties, inspired to simultaneous Phoenixian birth by the polluted cascade of daily poz.

I can tell you this for certain: The term “cuckold”, and its related emotional resonance, was thrust rudely into the public consciousness and popularized right here, at Chateau Heartiste, long before the current fascination with the pregnant (heh) weight of the slur. Kneejerk anti-truthers and perplexed alt-rightists scoffed at first contact with Le Chateau’s musings on the metadeath genetic threat cuckoldry poses to men, but in time even they began to see the value of the concept as a right and proper fitting metaphor for supplicants and sycophants and self-sodomizers of various stripes, which of course means they understood on a sub-discourse level the biomechanic sexual market truth implied by the insult.

To the gristle: What is a cuckservative?

Occam’s Razor ably decodes.

Very basically, the cuckservative is a white gentile conservative (or libertarian) who thinks he’s promoting his own interests but really isn’t.  In fact, the cuckservative is an extreme universalist and seems often to suffer from ethnomasochism & pathological altruism. In short, a cuckservative is a white (non-Jewish) conservative who isn’t racially aware.

That’s a serviceable academic description. I prefer something a leetle more… pungent.

CH definition: A cuckservative is a cowardly pussy who sucks up to leftoid equalists for mercy and pisses himself when he gets accused of racism, sexism, or anti-semitism.

Corollary to the above CH definition: The cuckservative will throw his brother and his nation under the bus if it means he keeps his token status as cog in the Hivemind machine. Those cocktail parties aren’t going to attend themselves!

So what’s the difference between a cuckservative and a garden variety shitlib? Delayed reaction. The cuckservative may or may not be a true believer in reality-denying feminism or anti-white antiracism, but he sure as hell knows to stick his crabbed finger in the air to see which cheek he should spread for his equalist overlord’s strap-on.

Some common traits of the species homo homo cuckservative:

– is quick to jump down the throat of any Realtalker.
– distances himself immediately from any ostensible ally who lets slip a jarring sin against the Narrative.
– will never once, not once, do or say something brave in his life.
– is at heart the rear-end of a lemming herd. won’t take a stand (or a plunge) until the numbers safely allow him to do so.
– is ignorant of or afraid to confront racial, ethnic, tribal truths.
– would rather bear witness to national decline and dissolution and preside over gross injustice than be on record that there are consequential race and sex differences beyond skin color and genitalia.
– thinks the only difference between the sexes that is acceptable to utter in public is the male penchant for gags and buttplugs. (he also projects wildly)
– dreadfully fears social ostracism, rendering him politically impotent.
– will force himself to clap loudly for pre-op Bruce Jenner, to coo falsely over mystery meat infants, to nod soberly in agreement when the pay gap lie is mentioned yet again as gospel truth, to pretend that Michelle Obama is attractive, and to insist women’s soccer is just as thrilling to watch as men’s soccer (which is not much thrilling to begin with).
– Will give every shrieking leftoid the benefit of the doubt while reflexively questioning the motives of every ballsy Realtalker.
– will preface every feeble tiptoe into his own Realtalk wading pool with an ass-covering “To be sure…” or a spastic impromptu paean to Martin Luther King, Jr.
– backs down with a quickness at roundtable debates with aggressive liberals.
– the only topics on which he won’t back down are taxes on the oligarchs and fighting terrorists over there so we don’t have to fight them here (while insisting open borders are American as apple pie and that muslim dude who shot dead a platoon of Christian soldiers was really a victim of discrimination and now, now, let’s not get crazy and question our shared enthusiasm for increasing Diversity™ in the military).
– will intone “diversity is our strength” while commuting home to an upscale gated community that is 98% White and 2% East Asian.
– exclaims “content of our character”, “fighting for freedom”, “blacks kill other blacks more than any other race”, and “hispanics are natural conservatives” without a hint of ironic detachment.
– has probably sexually molested a young boy sometime before his political career took off.

Cuckservatives are even more loathsome than true blue leftoid believers in the antiwhite progrom, because at least you can say the latter are loyal to a personal, if mortally twisted, ethos. The cuckservative is loyal to nothing but personal aggrandizement. The cuckservative so easily betrays his stated principles because, in fact, he has no principles. He is a globocorporate transnational post-american striver SWPL just as much as any of his ultraliberal co-evals, minus the overt eagerness for estate taxes and nationalized healthcare, and he’ll be damned if he’ll let some flyover smart-ass with an eye for both the big picture and the demonic detail to destabilize his easy-livin’ sinecure.

Given this list of characteristics, the “cuckold” root of the cuckservative metaphor is exceedingly apt. The cuckservative is, in habit of mind and sometimes in practice, that pathetic white man with noodle arms and crusted tear tracks sitting hunched on a stool in the corner of his bedroom watching, with willing fervor, his ecstatic white wife get pounded into post-white release by a buck nigra who eats his food and kicks his ass when the fridge needs refilling.

Yes, he’ll sit there nicely and putter with his pud while his wife (nation) gets banged out by another man (nonwhites, third world immigrants), as long as no one mistakes him for a small town prole who can’t tell the nose difference between a merlot and a pinot noir.

The cuckservative is cucked by antagonistic races, by antagonistic ideologies, by antagonistic corporate masters, by antagonistic talk show hosts, by antagonistic fat losers editorializing on the internet equivalent of teen beat gossip rags.

All he wants is their approval. A pat on the head from his sworn and intractable enemies. He swears he’ll keep his hands to himself and won’t cum until instructed to do so!

He is a low self-esteem, approval-seeking, whimpering cumlapper.

He is dog shit.

But there is hope.

Amazingly, some cuckservatives are LITERAL CUCKSERVATIVES. Commenter james1 peruses a few famous biographies,

It’s interesting that even though the Boehner family and the Bush family are Republicans, they are bigger race mixers than the Kennedy family and the Clinton family are Democrats. Jeb Bush married a Mestiza who looks like the maid at your local Motel 6 or Days Inn and John Boehner’a daughter married a Jamaican pothead who is a wannabe Bob Marley.

Also the Republican John McCain adopted a very dark skin girl from Sri Lanka while JFK/Jackie O and Bill/Hillary who are Democrats never adopted any Nonwhite children.

Literal cuckservatives take their prostrate mewling before the antiwhite mob a little too seriously. But with a familial C.V. like, for example, Boehner’s or ¡Jabe!’s, is it a surprise that these self-abnegating genetic dead ends can’t think clearly on the subject of race, borders, nation?

As Occam’s Razor puts it,

On the other hand, the idea of whites acting as a group to secure their own interests terrifies the cuckservative. If you ever want to troll a cuckservative, just repeatedly use the word “white,”  such as “this isn’t beneficial for the white community.”  The cuckservative will be triggered immediately.

Nobody gets triggered like a nancygoy cuckservative gets triggered. Truly pathetic specimens of manhood. Wasn’t Boehner the puffboy who blubbered like a baby on stage recollecting his time in the bathhouses of the Castro District? With “leaders” and “representatives” like him, who needs an opposition party? If Boehner wants a real reason to cry, he should reflect on his daughter’s coal burning, doing her part to destroy an aesthetic, cultural, and genetic heritage 20,000 years in the making.

The Cuckservative: Re-raising equalist leftoids, because, hey, he’s got something to disprove.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,467 other followers

%d bloggers like this: